Case Report: Can preoperative implantation of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation lead to embolic events in infective endocarditis?

Early-stage infective endocarditis (IE) can lead to severe complications, including infarctions and metastatic infections caused by inflammatory embolus shedding. Common embolism sites include the brain, spleen, kidneys, lungs, and intestines. Additionally, acute heart failure (AHF) can occur in up to 40% of cases, and its presence can impact the clinical outcomes of patients with IE. Cardiogenic shock (CGS) is often more likely to occur after AHF has taken place. If bacteria invade the blood, infectious shock can occur. Patients with IE can experience simple CGS, septic shock, or a combination of the two. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) typically serves as a Bridge for Heart failure and Cardiogenic shock. Previous research indicates that there are limited reports of ECMO support for patients with IE after CGS has occurred. Because CGS may occur at any time during IE treatment, it is important to understand the timing of ECMO auxiliary support and how to carry out comprehensive treatment after support. Timely treatment can help to reduce or avoid the occurrence of serious complications and improve the prognosis of patients with IE. Our work combines a case study to review the ECMO support of IE patients after CGS through a literature review. Overall, we suggest that when patients with IE have large bacterial thrombosis and a greater risk of shedding, it is recommended to carefully evaluate the indications and contraindications for ECMO after discussion by a multidisciplinary team (MDT). Still, active surgical treatment at an early stage is recommended.

Impact of rapid on-site evaluation in expediting the fast investigative lung cancer pathway.

OBJECTIVE: EBUS-TBNA is a method of acquiring tissue samples from intrathoracic lymph nodes and central intrathoracic tumours in patients suspected of having lung cancer. Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) denotes assessing tissue samples during EBUS (or bronchoscopy), providing instant feedback on sample adequacy and provisional cytomorphological diagnosis. Sector multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussion can then make informed treatment decisions, with confirmatory immunohistochemistry being finalised before provision of final treatment. Currently, impact of ROSE on length of time patients spend on the lung cancer diagnostic pathway remains unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the impact of ROSE on the length of time between patients' EBUS/bronchoscopy procedures and discussion at sector MDT, referred to as time to treatment decision (TTD), at our institution. Additionally, we assessed impact of ROSE on number of passes (number of times nodes/masses were sampled) per procedure. RESULTS: The mean TTD was 77.9% shorter (p = 0.001) with ROSE present than when absent. Patients who received ROSE spend 34.3% less time (p = 0.028) on lung cancer diagnostic pathway overall. There was a significant reduction in number of passes in non-malignant nodes with ROSE present (2.23) than when absent (3.14) (p < 0.001). With ROSE present there was a significantly greater number of passes at malignant sites (5.07) than non-malignant sites (2.23) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings support conclusions made in our institution's previous study, that utilisation of ROSE reduces TTD. ROSE also allows safe advancement through nodes with low suspicion of malignant involvement, focusing time on sampling nodes/masses of greater suspicion.

Diagnostic workup for esophageal cancer patients can be improved with checklists and clearer protocols; a comparative study between two tertiary centers in Europe.

BACKGROUND: Rapid and complete workup of newly diagnosed esophageal cancer is vital for a timely, individual and high-quality treatment strategy. The aim of this study was to uncover potential delay, inefficiencies and non-contributing investigations in the diagnostic process in two tertiary referral centers. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included all newly diagnosed esophageal cancer patients referred to or diagnosed in the Amsterdam UMC and Karolinska University Hospital between July 2020 and July 2021. Radiology, pathological assessment and multidisciplinary team meeting reports were reviewed. To assess time interval from diagnosis to treatment, dates of diagnosis, admittance to referral hospital, MDT meeting and start of treatment were collected. RESULTS: In total, 252 esophageal cancer patients were included, 187 were treated with curative intent. Curatively treated patients had a mean age of 66 years, were predominantly male (74.9 %) with an adenocarcinoma (71.1 %). Curatively treated patients had a median time from diagnosis to referral of seven days (IQR:0-11) and of 35 days (IQR:28-45) between diagnosis and start of treatment. Main reasons for the significant (P < 0.001) differences in time between diagnosis and treatment between centers, Amsterdam UMC (39 days) vs Karolinska (27 days), were need for additional diagnostics (47.8 %) and differences in referral routine. Gastroscopy was repeated in 32.2 % of patients, mainly for further anatomical mapping. CONCLUSION: Significant time differences between centers in the path from diagnosis to start treatment can be explained by differences in workup approach, referral routines and MDT meeting regulations. Repeat of gastroscopy can be prevented with clearer endoscopy guidelines.

Multidisciplinary team diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic cancer: Current landscape and future prospects.

The pathogenesis of pancreatic cancer has not been completely clear, there is no highly sensitive and specific detection method, so early diagnosis is very difficult. Despite the rapid development of tumor diagnosis and treatment, it is difficult to break through in the short term and the overall 5-year survival rate of pancreatic cancer is less than 8%. In the face of the increasing incidence of pancreatic cancer, in addition to strengthening basic research, exploring its etiology and pathogenesis, it is urgent to optimize the existing diagnosis and treatment methods through standard multidisciplinary team (MDT), and formulate personalized treatment plan to achieve the purpose of improving the curative effect. However, there are some problems in MDT, such as insufficient understanding and enthusiasm of some doctors, failure to operate MDT according to the system, lack of good communication between domestic and foreign peers, and lack of attention in personnel training and talent echelon construction. It is expected to protect the rights and interests of doctors in the future and ensure the continuous operation of MDT. To strengthen the research on the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic cancer, MDT can try the Internet +MDT mode to improve the efficiency of MDT.

Single-centre experience with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy for neuroendocrine tumours (NETs): results using a theranostic molecular imaging-guided approach.

AIM: To summarise our centre's experience managing patients with neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) in the first 5 years after the introduction of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-octreotate (LUTATE). The report emphasises aspects of the patient management related to functional imaging and use of radionuclide therapy. METHODS: We describe the criteria for treatment with LUTATE at our centre, the methodology for patient selection, and the results of an audit of clinical measures, imaging results and patient-reported outcomes. Subjects are treated initially with four cycles of ~ 8 GBq of LUTATE administered as an outpatient every 8 weeks. RESULTS: In the first 5 years offering LUTATE, we treated 143 individuals with a variety of NETs of which approx. 70% were gastroentero-pancreatic in origin (small bowel: 42%, pancreas: 28%). Males and females were equally represented. Mean age at first treatment with LUTATE was 61 ± 13 years with range 28-87 years. The radiation dose to the organs considered most at risk, the kidneys, averaged 10.6 ± 4.0 Gy in total. Median overall survival (OS) from first receiving LUTATE was 72.5 months with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 32.3 months. No evidence of renal toxicity was seen. The major long-term complication seen was myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with a 5% incidence. CONCLUSIONS: LUTATE treatment for NETs is a safe and effective treatment. Our approach relies heavily on functional and morphological imaging informing the multidisciplinary team of NET specialists to guide appropriate therapy, which we suggest has contributed to the favourable outcomes seen.

How Is the Spectrum of Sarcoma Surgery Assessed?

PURPOSE: To meet the challenges of the precision medicine era, quality assessment of shared sarcoma care becomes pivotal. The MDT approach is the most important parameter for a successful outcome. Of all MDT disciplines, surgery is the key step to rendering sarcoma patients disease free; therefore, defining its spectrum is critical. To the best of the authors' knowledge, a comprehensive interoperable digital platform to assess the scope of sarcoma surgery in its full complexity is lacking. METHODS: An interoperable digital platform on sarcoma surgery has been created to assess the clinical exposure, tumor characteristics, and surgical settings and techniques applied for both resections and reconstructions of sarcomas. RESULTS: The surgical exposure of an individual surgeon over time served as a pilot. Over the study period of 10 years, there were 723 sarcoma board/MDT meetings discussing 3130 patients. A total of 1094 patients underwent 1250 surgical interventions on mesenchymal tumors by one single sarcoma surgeon. These included 615 deep soft tissue tumors (197 benign, 102 intermediate, 281 malignant, 27 simulator, 7 metastasis, 1 blood); 116 superficial soft tissue tumors (45 benign, 12 intermediate, 40 malignant, 18 simulator, 1 blood); and 519 bone tumors (129 benign, 112 intermediate, 182 malignant, 18 simulator, 46 metastasis, 14 blood, and 18 sequelae of first treatment). Detailed types of resections and reconstructions were analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: An interoperable digital data platform on sarcoma surgery with transparent real-time descriptive analytics is feasible and enables large-scale definition of the spectrum of sarcoma surgery to meet the challenges of sarcoma precision care in the future.

[Interstitial lung diseases : Classification, differential diagnosis and treatment approaches in a heterogeneous group of chronic lung disorders]. / Interstitielle Lungenerkrankungen : Klassifikation, Differenzialdiagnostik und therapeutische Ansätze bei einer heterogenen Gruppe chronischer Lungenerkrankungen.

Interstitial lung diseases (ILD) comprise a heterogeneous group of chronic lung disorders of different etiologies that can not only affect the interstitium but also the alveolar space and the bronchial system. According to the "Global Burden of Disease Study" there has been an increase in incidence over the last decades and it is expected that the number of ILD-associated deaths will double over the next 20 years. ILD are grouped into those of unknown cause, e.g. idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), and ILD of known cause, which include drug-induced and connective tissue disease-associated ILD as well as granulomatous ILD such as sarcoidosis and hypersensitivity pneumonitis. In addition, some ILD present a progressive fibrosing phenotype, which influences therapeutic decisions. Predominantly inflammatory entities are treated with immunosuppressives, whereas predominantly fibrosing ILD are treated with antifibrotic drugs; in some cases, a combination of both is necessary. The spectrum of differential diagnoses in ILD is broad, but definite diagnosis is essential for treatment selection; therefore, the multidisciplinary ILD board plays a pivotal role.

Salivary gland cancers in elderly patients: challenges and therapeutic strategies.

Salivary gland carcinomas (SGCs) are the most heterogeneous subgroup of head and neck malignant tumors, accounting for more than 20 subtypes. The median age of SGC diagnosis is expected to rise in the following decades, leading to crucial clinical challenges in geriatric oncology. Elderly patients, in comparison with patients aged below 65 years, are generally considered less amenable to receiving state-of-the-art curative treatments for localized disease, such as surgery and radiation/particle therapy. In the advanced setting, chemotherapy regimens are often dampened by the consideration of cardiovascular and renal comorbidities. Nevertheless, the elderly population encompasses a broad spectrum of functionalities. In the last decades, some screening tools (e.g. the G8 questionnaire) have been developed to identify those subjects who should receive a multidimensional geriatric assessment, to answer the question about the feasibility of complex treatments. In the present article, we discuss the most frequent SGC histologies diagnosed in the elderly population and the relative 5-years survival outcomes based on the most recent data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Moreover, we review the therapeutic strategies currently available for locoregionally advanced and metastatic disease, taking into account the recent advances in precision oncology. The synergy between the Multidisciplinary Tumor Board and the Geriatrician aims to shape the most appropriate treatment pathway for each elderly patient, focusing on global functionality instead of the sole chronological age.

Rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor with metachronous liver metastasis demonstrated no relapse after multidisciplinary team discussion and comprehensive treatment: a case report.

Background: This study sought to explore the role and significance of multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussion and comprehensive treatment in the diagnosis and treatment of a gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) with liver metastasis. For GIST patients with liver metastasis, MDT can evaluate whether the liver metastasis is resectable, so as to formulate accurate treatment goals and the best diagnosis and treatment plan. Case Description: A 53-year-old male patient with localized rectal GIST with metachronous liver metastasis (MLM) was admitted to Yunnan Cancer Hospital in October 2014. At the 1st visit, he was diagnosed with locally advanced rectal GIST, and a MDT discussion was held by departments of colorectal surgery, imaging, pathology and oncology. The tumor shrank after neoadjuvant targeted treatment with imatinib. A local resection of the rectal GIST was successfully performed via the anal approach. R0 resection was achieved and the function of the anal sphincter was preserved. Following the operation, oral imatinib treatment was discontinued after 2 years. The patient developed isolated liver metastasis 6 months later. After the MDT discussion by departments of colorectal surgery, hepatobiliary surgery, imaging, pathology, and oncology, R0 resection of the liver metastasis was achieved. After the operation, sunitinib was administered for 4.5 years. The patient's overall survival (OS) has reached 7.5 years. No tumor recurrence or metastasis was found in the re-examinations. The follow-up is ongoing. Conclusions: Targeted therapy combined with surgery is the most suitable way to cure GIST patients with liver metastasis. More importantly, the multi-disciplinary management and the standardized diagnosis and treatment of GIST patients with liver metastasis through MDT discussion can improve the quality of life and prolong the survival of patients.

A Regional Survey on Merkel Cell Carcinoma: A Plea for Uniform Patient Journey Modeling and Diagnostic-Therapeutic Pathway.

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive cutaneous neuroendocrine cancer that usually affects the elderly and immunosuppressed in sun-exposed areas. Due to its rarity, it is frequently unrecognized, and its management is not standardized across medical centers, despite the more recent availability of immunotherapy, with avelumab as first-line treatment improving the prognosis even in advanced stages of disease. We conducted a purpose-designed survey of a selected sample of physicians working in the Lazio region, in Italy, to assess their awareness and knowledge of MCC as well as their perspective on assisted diagnostic and therapeutic pathways. The Lazio region, and in particular Rome, is one of the most important academic and non- academic center in Italy dedicated to the diagnosis and treatment of skin cancer. A total of 368 doctors (including 100 general practitioners, 72 oncologists, 87 dermatologists, 59 surgeons, and 50 anatomopathologists) agreed to be part of this survey. Surgeons, oncologists, and dermatologists thought themselves significantly more updated on MCC than primary care physicians, but more than half of the interviewees are interested in CCM training courses and training with clearer and more standardized care pathways. Significant differences have been reported from survey participants in terms of multidisciplinary team set up for MCC management. The identification of specialized centers and the improvement of communication pathways among different specialties, as well as between patients and physicians, could be very beneficial in improving patients' journey modeling and starting a uniform diagnostic and therapeutic pathway for MCC patients in the new era of immunotherapies.

Multidisciplinary Team Meeting Proposal and Final Therapeutic Choice in Early Breast Cancer: Is There an Agreement?

Background: A multidisciplinary team meeting (MDM) approach in breast cancer (BC) management is a standard of care. One of the roles of MDMs is to identify the best diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for patients (pts) with new diagnosis of early BC. The purpose of this study was to define whether there was an agreement between the planned program (i.e., MDMs-based decision) and that actually applied. In addition, the study explored factors associated with discordance. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of a consecutive series of 291 patients with new diagnosis of early BC, discussed at MDMs at the University Hospital of Udine (Italy), from January 2017 to June 2018. The association between clinico-biological factors and discordance between what was decided during the MDMs and what was consequently applied by the oncologist was explored through uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Results: The median age was 62 years (range 27-88 years). Among invasive early BC patients, the most frequent phenotype was luminal A (38%), followed by luminal B (33%), HER2-positive (12%), and triple-negative (5%). In situ carcinoma (DCIS) represented 12% of cases. The median time from MDM discussion to first oncologic examination was 2 weeks. The rate of discordance between MDM-based decision and final choice, during a face-to-face consultation with the oncologist, was 15.8% (46/291). The most frequent reason for changing the MDM-based program was clinical decision (87%). Follow-up was preferred to the chemotherapy (CT) proposed within the MDMs in 15% of cases, and to the endocrine therapy (ET) in 39% of cases (among these, 44.5% had a diagnosis of DCIS). Therapeutic change from sequential CT-ET to ET alone was chosen in 16/46 pts (35%): among these patients, seven had a luminal B disease and six had an HER2-positive disease. On univariate analysis, factors associated with discordance were values of Ki-67 14%-30% (OR 3.91; 95% CI 1.19-12.9), age >70 years (OR 2.44, 95% CI 1.28-4.63), housewife/retired status (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.14-4.85), polypharmacy (OR 1.95; 95% CI 1.02-3.72), postmenopausal status (OR 4.15; 95% CI 1.58-10.9), and high Charlson Comorbidity Index (OR 1.31; 95% CI 1.09-1.57). The association with marital status, educational level, alcohol and smoke habits, presence of a caregiver, parity, grading, histotype and phenotype, and stage was not statistically significant. On multivariate analysis, only Ki-67 value maintained its statistical significance. Conclusion: The results of our study could be useful for enhancing the role of MDMs in the clinical decision-making process in early BC.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy followed by surgery with curative intent in 35 patients with advanced NSCLC: the retrospective experiences of a multidisciplinary team.

Background: In recent years, neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy has been used to treat locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, no data are available to guide the selection of patients suitable for radical resection. In this paper, we report a clinical mode based on a multidisciplinary team (MDT). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of patients with advanced NSCLC who were treated in our center between 26 December, 2019 and 1 October, 2021. These cases received an MDT assessment first. Eligible patients then received chemotherapy combined with personalized neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Adverse events were recorded. Chest computed tomography (CT) was performed every other cycle for tumor assessment. Radical resection was subsequently performed for potentially resectable tumors. Intraoperative conditions and surgical complications were recorded. The resected specimens were evaluated to determine the response to neoadjuvant therapy. Results: The MDT team selected a total of 35 patients (squamous cell carcinoma: n=26, adenocarcinoma: n=8, adenosquamous carcinoma: n=1) for radical resection following neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy. According to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) findings, 1 patient had complete remission, 27 had partial remission, 6 had progressive disease, and 1 had stable disease. All participants underwent radical resection, including video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery [VATS; 32 (91.4%)], sleeve resection [7 (20.0%)], and multilobar resection [7 (20.0%)]. A total of 17 patients (48.6%) achieved complete pathological remission, and 10 (28.6%) achieved major pathological remission. After surgery, the pathological grade was reduced in 33 patients (94.2%); the RECIST findings were unrelated to postoperative pathological remission (P=0.15). Conclusions: The MDT mode helps to select suitable patients for radical resection and results in satisfactory pathological remission.

The Prognostic Effect of Multidisciplinary Team Intervention in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The effect of multidisciplinary team intervention (MDT) on the prognosis of advanced gastric cancer (GC) is still controversial. This study aims to analyze the effect of MDTs on the overall survival time of advanced gastric cancer patients. METHODS: Patients with advanced GC who underwent surgical treatment between 2007 and 2014 were included in the study. They were divided into two groups; the MDT group received MDT treatment and the non-MDT group received conventional treatment. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare the overall survival (OS) of the two groups. The prognostic factors of advanced GC were evaluated by multivariate Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: 394 patients were included in our study. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the prognosis of advanced GC patients with who underwent MDT intervention was better than those without (3-year OS of 55.6% vs. 46.1%, p = 0.005), Multivariate analysis indicated that MDT intervention could reduce mortality (HR = 0.493, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: MDT intervention is an effective measure that improves the survival of patients with advanced GC.

Which surgical strategy for colorectal cancer with synchronous hepatic metastases provides the best outcome? A comparison between primary first, liver first and simultaneous approach.

BACKGROUND: There is no clear consensus about the best surgical strategy for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and synchronous liver metastases (SCRLM). METHODS: Between 2009 and 2019, patients with CRC and SCRLM considered for curative treatment were included. Perioperative and follow-up data were analysed to examine the safety and survival outcomes of primary first (PF), liver first (LF) and simultaneous resection (SR) strategies. RESULTS: 204 patients were identified, consisting of PF (n = 129), LF (n = 26) and SR (n = 49). Forty-five patients (22.1%) failed to have either the primary or the liver metastases resected following initial LF (n = 11, 42.3%) or PF (n = 34, 26.4%), respectively (p < 0.001). The postoperative morbidity rates were 31.0%, 38.4% and 40.8% in PF, LF and SR group, respectively (p = 0.409); the mortality rates were 2.3%, 0% and 4.1%, respectively (p = 0.547). The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) were 94%, 72%, 53% in the PF group, 74%, 54%, 36% in the LF group, and 91%, 74%, 63% in the SR group. LF group had the worst OS compared to PF and SR (p = 0.040, p = 0.052). The 1-, 3- and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) were 31%, 15%, 10% in PF, 21%, 9% and 9% in LF and 45%, 28% and 28% in SR group, respectively. SR group had a better DFS compared to PF and LF (p = 0.005, p = 0.008). At the multivariate analysis, there was no difference between the three strategies in terms of OS (PF vs SR OS-HR 1.090, p = 0.808; LF vs SR OS-HR 1.582, p = 0.365) and the PF had a worse DFS compared to the SR approach (PF vs SR DFS-HR 1.803, p = 0.007; LF vs SR DFS-HR 1.252, p = 0.492). CONCLUSIONS: PF, LF and SR had comparable postoperative morbidity and mortality. The three surgical strategies had similar OS outcomes. The PF strategy was associated with a worse DFS than SR, while the LF approach was associated with a high failure rate to progress to the second stage (primary tumour resection).

Acceptability and effectiveness of a multidisciplinary team approach involving counselling for mesh-removal patients.

Patients with complications following mesh removal risk a variety of symptoms, and can view medical intervention negatively. This study explored the patient-acceptability of a Multidisciplinary Team (MDT), and whether the presence of a Counsellor would be accepted and effective. Twenty consecutively referred women, who had undergone mesh-removal but experienced complications were interviewed about their experiences, and completed the Queensland scale for pelvic floor symptoms, McGill Pain Questionnaire, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales, before and after treatment. Patients had high levels of pelvic-floor symptoms, sensory and affective pain, anxiety, and depression. 70% reported a positive MDT experience; predicted by higher anxiety, and lower depression. 60% elected to receive Counselling, which commenced within one week of referral, typically lasted 1-4 sessions, and reduced pelvic-floor symptoms, affective pain, anxiety, and depression. Results suggest that the MDT approach is generally acceptable for this patient group, and that mesh-removal patients accept and benefit from input by a Counsellor.Impact statementWhat is already known on this subject? Concerns have been raised regarding the safety of mesh insertion. Multidisciplinary Teams (MDTs) are suggested to offer a strong approach to managing many women's health conditions, but no studies have examined mesh-removal patients, making generalisation difficult to the current patient group. Furthermore, it is unknown whether an MDT approach, including a Counsellor, would be acceptable to mesh-removal patients.What do the results of this study add? Patients had high levels of pelvic-floor symptoms, pain, anxiety, and depression. 70% reported the MDT experience as positive, predicted by higher anxiety, and lower depression. 60% elected to receive Counselling, which reduced pelvic-floor symptoms, affective pain, anxiety, and depression.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? The Counselling provided as part of the MDT approach was able to commence quickly, did not require many sessions, and reduced reported pelvic-floor symptoms, affective pain, anxiety, and depression. These findings suggest that an MDT approach involving Counselling is generally acceptable, and that mesh-removal patients accept and benefit from the input of a Counsellor, as part of their treatment.

The value of the multidisciplinary team in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Paving the way for precision medicine in toxicities management.

The new landscape of treatments for metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma (mRCC) is constantly expanding, but it is associated with the emergence of novel toxicities, adding to up to those observed in the tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI) era. Indeed, the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) alone or in combination has been associated with the development of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) involving multiple-organ systems which, even if rarely, had led to fatal outcomes. Moreover, due to the relatively recent addition of ICIs to the previously available treatments, the potential additive adverse effects of these combinations are still unknown. A prompt recognition and management of these toxicities currently represents a fundamental issue in oncology, since it correlates with the outcome of cancer patients. Even if clinical guidelines provide indications for the management of irAEs, no specific protocol to evaluate the individual risk of developing an adverse event during therapy is currently available. A multidisciplinary approach addressing appropriate interventions aimed at reducing the risk of any insidious, severe, and/or dose-limiting toxicity might represent the most efficacious strategy to timely prevent and manage severe irAEs, allowing indirectly to improve both patients' cancer-specific survival and quality of life. In this review, we reported a five-case series of toxicity events that occurred at our center during treatment for mRCC followed by the remarks of physicians from different specialties, pinpointing the relevant role of an integrated and extended multidisciplinary team in a modern model of mRCC patient management.

Drug fever induced by antibiotics of ß-lactams in a patient after posterior cervical spine surgery-A case report and literature review.

Drug fever is a febrile reaction that emerges temporarily with the administration of a drug or a variety of drugs and disappears after cessation of the targeting agent. There are a few previous reports about drug fever, but they pertain mainly to patients accompanied by no surgical intervention. Based on the literature reviewed, drug fever in patients after posterior cervical spine surgery has never been mentioned before; therefore, we present a 56-year-old man diagnosed with drug fever after posterior cervical spine surgery for traumatic cervical myelopathy. Fortunately, his body temperature rapidly came down in 2 days after discontinuing the antibiotics. He was discharged after two more days of observation, and the patient recovered well without any further complaints. Early diagnosis of drug fever may greatly reduce inappropriate and potentially detrimental diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. For patients with persistent fever, if it happened days after surgery, particularly when it is without any infectious evidence, then it is necessarily important to consider a possible reason of drug-induced fever.

Surgical treatment of locally recurrent rectal cancer: a narrative review.

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the recent literature on surgical treatment of locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). BACKGROUND: LRRC is a heterogeneous disease that requires a multidisciplinary treatment approach. The treatment and prognosis depend on the site and type of recurrence. Radical resection remains the primary method for achieving long-term survival and improving symptom control. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy can reduce tumor volume and improve the R0 resection rate. Surgeons must clearly understand pelvic anatomy, develop a detailed preoperative plan, adopt a multidisciplinary approach for the surgical resection of the tumor as well as any invaded soft tissues, vessels, and bones, and ensure proper reconstruction. However, extended radical surgery often leads to a higher risk of postoperative complications and a low quality of life. METHODS: We searched English-language articles with keywords "locally recurrent rectal cancer", "surgery" and "multidisciplinary team" in PubMed published between January 2000 to October 2020. CONCLUSIONS: LRRC is a complex problem. Long-term survival is not impossible following multidisciplinary treatment in appropriately selected LRRC patients. The management of LRRC relies on a specialist team that determines the biological behavior of the tumor and evaluates treatment options through multidisciplinary discussions, thereby balancing the surgical costs and benefits, alleviating postoperative complications, and improving patients' quality of life.

Clinically decisive (dis)agreement in multidisciplinary team assessment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; a prospective, national, multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Decisions regarding tumor staging, operability, resectability, and treatment strategy in patients with esophageal cancer are made at multidisciplinary team (MDT) conferences. We aimed to assess interobserver agreement from four national MDT conferences and whether this would have a clinical impact. METHODS: A total of 20 patients with esophageal cancer were included across all four upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancer centers. Fully anonymized patient data were distributed among the MDT conferences which decided on TNM category, resectability, operability, curability, and treatment strategy blinded to each other's decisions. The interobserver agreement was expressed as both the raw observer agreement and with Krippendorff's α values. Finally, a case-by-case evaluation was performed to determine if disagreement would have had a clinical impact. RESULTS: A total of 80 MDT evaluations were available for analysis. A moderate to near-perfect observer agreement of 79.2%, 55.8%, and 82.5% for TNM category was observed, respectively. Substantial agreement for resectability and moderate agreement for curability were found. However, an only fair agreement was observed for the operability category. The treatment strategies had a slight agreement which corresponded to disagreement having a clinical impact in 12 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal cancer MDT conferences had an acceptable interobserver agreement on resectability and TM categories; however, the operability assessment had a high level of disagreement. Consequently, the agreement on treatment strategy was reduced with a potential clinical impact. In future MDT conferences, emphasis should be on prioritizing the relevant information being readily available (operability, T & M categories) to minimize the risk of disagreement in the assessments and treatment strategies, and thus, delayed or suboptimal treatment.

The value of multidisciplinary team (MDT) management in the diagnosis and treatment of primary intrathoracic synovial sarcomas: a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Synovial sarcoma (SS) is a rare malignant soft tissue tumor. Primary intrathoracic SS is extremely rare, with limited diagnosis and treatment experiences. The aim of our study was to retrospectively study the clinicopathological characteristics, treatment and prognosis of primary intrathoracic SS and the impact of multidisciplinary team (MDT) management in diagnosis and treatment on patient prognosis. METHODS: The clinical and pathological characteristics, treatment, survival and prognosis of patients with primary intrathoracic SS admitted to the National Cancer Center from January 1999 to December 2018, as well as MDT intervention during diagnosis and treatment, were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were enrolled, including 7 (53.8%) males and 6 (46.3%) females, with primary intrathoracic SS in the lung (8/13, 61.5%), mediastinum (4/13, 30.8%) and pleura (1/13, 7.7%) as confirmed by morphological observation, immunohistochemical (IHC) staining and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Overall, 10/13 (76.9%) patients underwent surgery, and 6/10 (60.0%) received postoperative adjuvant therapy. Only 23.1% of patients received nonsurgical therapy. The MDT discussed and managed seven patients before and/or after surgery and one patient who did not undergo surgery. The estimated 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 50.0% and 30.0%, respectively. Patients who were managed by an MDT had a longer median OS time than those who were not (46.0 vs. 18.0 months). Age (P=0.018), tumor location (P=0.029), and Ki-67 (P=0.020) were found to be significantly related to OS. CONCLUSIONS: Monophasic morphology and fusion gene characteristics are the main features for the diagnosis of primary intrathoracic SS. MDT management can help obtain accurate diagnoses and provide reasonable therapeutic options.