Splenic rupture secondary to pancreatic malignancy invasion: A rare case.

Malignancy is a rare etiology of splenic rupture, with most documented cases resulting from hematologic cancers. There have been very few reports of splenic rupture resulting from invasion or metastasis of adenocarcinoma and even fewer reports resulting from specifically pancreatic adenocarcinoma. In this case report, we outline the clinical course of a 60-year-old male with splenic rupture and hemoperitoneum following a ground level fall who was transferred to the Shock Trauma Center (STC) from a local emergency department. Outside of the ruptured spleen, no other traumatic injuries were found on examination or imaging. Due to the initial concern for traumatic etiology, exploratory laparotomy was performed with splenectomy and distal pancreatectomy. Postoperative pathology results revealed pancreatic adenocarcinoma with splenic invasion staged pT3N0. This report provides a novel example of splenic rupture in the background of locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma and further solidifies the importance of maintaining a broad differential in cases of seemingly innocuous trauma.

Puestow surgery in a SPINK mutation chronic pancreatitis: a rare case report.

This case report highlights the clinical presentation and surgical management of a 27-year-old man with recurrent pancreatitis attributed to a homozygous SPINK1 (N34S) mutation. The patient, who experienced multiple hospital admissions, underwent extensive diagnostic evaluations, including imaging and genetic testing, confirming the hereditary nature of his condition. Despite unsuccessful endoscopic interventions, a laparoscopic Puestow procedure was performed, aiming to alleviate symptoms and improve pancreatic drainage. Postoperatively, the patient's recovery was successful, and he was discharged with supplemental pancreatic enzyme therapy. The differential diagnosis included autoimmune pancreatitis and non-hereditary chronic pancreatitis. This case underscores the challenges and considerations in the diagnosis and management of hereditary pancreatitis associated with SPINK1 mutations, emphasizing the role of surgical interventions for selected cases.

A case of laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy for small solid pseudopapillary neoplasm in an adult male with anomalous splenic vein confluence.

Although anomalies of the celiac and/or superior mesenteric arteries are occasionally encountered during abdominal surgery, anomalous venous confluence is seldom reported during pancreatic surgery. Herein, we present a rare case of laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (LSPDP) for the treatment of a solid pseudopapillary neoplasm in an asymptomatic 37-year-old male with an anomalous splenic vein (SpV) confluence. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) revealed an anomaly of the SpV, which coursed transversely through the superior border of the pancreas, over the celiac artery and into the portal vein, along the superior line of the common hepatic artery. We successfully performed an LSPDP without peripancreatic vessel injury by exposing the SpV and splenic artery through an approach from the superior position of the pancreas. Preoperative imaging, especially CTA, is crucial to ensuring a safe, successful laparoscopic pancreatectomy.

Proposal of a revised 3-tier "2 mm" risk classification model for postoperative pancreatic fistula in robotic pancreatoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: The recent International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) risk classification for postoperative pancreatic fistula (grade B/C) was developed based on data from open and mixed minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy. The ISGPS risk classification model has not been validated specifically for POPF after robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD). METHODS: We calculated the rate of POPF (ISGPS 2016 definition, grade B/C) by analyzing consecutive patients after RPD by surgeons after their learning curves (80 RPDs per surgeon). The validation of the ISGPS 4-tier and the simplified 3-tier risk classification was conducted using the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC). RESULTS: From 2019 to 2023, 187 patients after RPD were included. Neither the ISGPS 4-tier nor the simplified 3-tier classification model showed robust discrimination (AUC: 0.696 and 0.685, respectively). Moreover, both risk classifications failed to differentiate the rates of POPF and major complications among subgroups. Multivariate analysis suggested that soft pancreatic texture and pancreatic duct ≤ 2 mm were independent risk factors for POPF after RPD. After adjusting the duct size's cutoff from 3 to 2 mm, the revised 4-tier "2 mm" classification model showed no significant difference between risk categories B and C (6.7% vs. 9.4%, P = 0.063). The revised 3-tier "2 mm" classification model stratified patients into A (n = 54), B (n = 68), and C (n = 65) groups, with corresponding POPF rates of 0.0%, 8.8%, and 23.1% (P < 0.001), and major complication rates of 5.6, 14.7, and 24.6% (P = 0.014), respectively. Compared to the simplified 3-tier classification model, the revised 3-tier "2 mm" classification model showed improved discrimination (AUC: 0.753 vs. 0.685, P = 0.034) and clinical utility. CONCLUSIONS: The current ISGPS 4-tier and the simplified 3-tier classification models lacked sufficient discrimination in patients after RPD. We propose a revised 3-tier "2 mm" risk classification model for RPD with a robust discrimination, which requires further international validation with prospectively obtained data.

Surgical management of pancreatic neoplasms in children: a single-institution experience over 15 years.

Introduction: Pancreatic neoplasms are rare among children and very few studies have reported on surgical outcomes for pediatric pancreatic neoplasms. Therefore, we aimed to describe patient and tumor characteristics and report on the surgical outcomes of pediatric pancreatic neoplasm. Methods: In this retrospective single-center study, we reviewed and analyzed the data of patients who underwent surgery for pediatric pancreatic neoplasms at Severance Children's Hospital between January 2007 and December 2022. Clinical data including demographics, surgical procedures, and postoperative and long-term outcomes were evaluated. Results: A total of 28 patients underwent surgical treatment for pancreatic neoplasms with a median age of 11.7 years (range: 0.4-17.8). The most common histological diagnosis among benign tumors was solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN), which occurred in 20 patients (71.4%). This was followed by a mucinous cyst, nesidioblastosis, pseudocyst, duplication cyst, and benign cyst, each occurring in one patient (3.5%). Regarding malignant tumors, pancreatoblastoma, solid pseudopapillary carcinoma, and malignant pheochromocytoma were noted in one patient each (3.5%). Tumor locations included the head in 4 patients (14.2%), the body in 7 (25%), and the tail in 16 (57.1%), and was diffuse in 1 (3.5%). The most common surgical resection range was distal pancreatectomy, found in 22 patients (78.5%), followed by pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy, found in 2 (7.2%); duodenum-preserving pancreatic resection, central pancreatectomy, tumor enucleation, and near-total pancreatectomy were performed in one patient each (3.5%). Overall, 4 patients developed grade B or C postoperative pancreatic fistulas, and 1 experienced postoperative mortality due to uncontrollable bleeding. The mean follow-up period was 6.1 years (range: 1-15.6 years), during which no significant impact on growth after surgery was detected. Among the 20 patients with SPN, tumor rupture occurred in 4 (20%), among whom 2 experienced tumor recurrences. Conclusions: Histological diagnosis of benign tumors was predominant in this case series and various extents of surgical resection were performed. Surgical treatment for pediatric pancreatic neoplasms appears to be safe and effective. However, considering the long-term prognosis of these patients, it is essential to determine the appropriate extent of surgical resection based on the location of the tumor.

Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting clinically relevant delayed gastric emptying in patients undergoing total pancreatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Current research on delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery is predominantly focused on pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), with little exploration into DGE following total pancreatectomy (TP). This study aims to investigate the risk factors for DGE after TP and develop a predictive model. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 106 consecutive cases of TP performed between January 2013 and December 2023 at Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH). After applying the inclusion criteria, 96 cases were selected for analysis. These patients were randomly divided into a training set (n = 67) and a validation set (n = 29) in a 7:3 ratio. LASSO regression and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with clinically relevant DGE (grades B/C) and to construct a predictive nomogram. The ROC curve, calibration curve, decision curve analysis (DCA), and clinical impact curve (CIC) were employed to evaluate the model's prediction accuracy. RESULTS: The predictive model identified end-to-side gastrointestinal anastomosis, intraoperative blood transfusion, and venous reconstruction as risk factors for clinically relevant DGE after TP. The ROC was 0.853 (95%CI 0.681-0.900) in the training set and 0.789 (95%CI 0.727-0.857) in the validation set. The calibration curve, DCA, and CIC confirmed the accuracy and practicality of the nomogram. CONCLUSION: We developed a novel predictive model that accurately identifies potential risk factors associated with clinically relevant DGE in patients undergoing TP.

A comparative analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic total pancreatectomy: insights from the National Cancer Database.

Total pancreatectomy is a complex procedure used in the management of pancreatic cancer. While minimally invasive techniques have been increasingly adopted, limited data exist comparing robotic total pancreatectomy (RTP) and laparoscopic total pancreatectomy (LTP). This study evaluates the utilization, short- and long-term outcomes of RTP and LTP using the National Cancer Database. Patients with stages I-III pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent RTP or LTP between 2010 and 2019 were identified. Patient demographics, treatment characteristics, pathologic outcomes, postoperative outcomes, and overall survival were compared. Multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional-hazards models were used to assess the association of surgical approach with outcomes. Of the 995 patients included, 188 (19%) underwent RTP and 807 (81%) underwent LTP. The utilization of minimally invasive techniques increased over time, with RTP accounting for 24% of cases in 2019. RTP had lower conversion rates than LTP (16% vs. 24%, p = 0.031), but this difference was not significant after adjusting for confounders. Postoperative outcomes, including length of stay, 30-day readmission, and 30- and 90-day mortality, were similar between RTP and LTP. The median overall survival was 22.3 months for RTP and 23.6 months for LTP (p = 0.647). RTP and LTP demonstrate comparable perioperative, pathological, and oncological outcomes for the management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Despite the increasing adoption of minimally invasive total pancreatectomy, it remains a rare operation and should be performed in experienced centers to optimize outcomes.

The efficacy of wrapping with polyglycolic acid mesh and fibrin glue in preventing clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (WRAP Study): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) continues to be the most common complication after distal pancreatectomy (DP). Recent advancements in surgical techniques have established minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) as the standard treatment for various conditions, including pancreatic cancer. However, MIDP has not demonstrated a clear advantage over open DP in terms of POPF rates, indicating the need for additional strategies to prevent POPF in MIDP. This trial (WRAP study) aims to evaluate the efficacy of wrapping the pancreatic stump with polyglycolic acid (PGA) mesh and fibrin glue in preventing clinically relevant (CR-) POPF following MIDP. METHODS: This multicenter, randomized controlled trial will include patients scheduled for laparoscopic or robotic DP for tumors in the pancreatic body and/or tail. Eligible participants will be centrally randomized into either the control group (Group A) or the intervention group (Group B), where the pancreatic stump will be reinforced by PGA mesh and fibrin glue. In both groups, pancreatic transection will be performed using a bioabsorbable reinforcement-attached stapler. A total of 172 patients will be enrolled across 14 high-volume centers in Japan. The primary endpoint is the incidence of CR-POPF (International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery grade B/C). DISCUSSION: The WRAP study will determine whether the reinforcement of the pancreatic stump with PGA mesh and fibrin glue, a technique whose utility has been previously debated, could become the best practice in the era of MIDP, thereby enhancing its safety. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials on June 15, 2024 (jRCTs032240120).

Surgical Approach and Length of Stay in Octogenarians Undergoing Pancreatic Resection for Malignancy.

INTRODUCTION: Pancreatic surgery often has a lengthy recovery in the elderly. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) can decrease length of stay (LOS), but it is unknown if this benefit applies to octogenarians (Age > 79). METHODS: The NSQIP database was used to determine if MIS approaches were associated with reduced LOS among octogenarians undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple) or distal pancreatectomy (Distal). Operative approaches were classified as "Open" or "MIS" and propensity score (PS) matching was performed. RESULTS: For the Whipple, 1665 Open and 101 MIS procedures occurred (median LOS 9, 8 days, p = 0.584). For Distal, 472 Open and 223 MIS procedures occurred (median LOS 6, 5 days, p < 0.01). After PS matching, there were 202 Whipple (101 per group) and 446 Distal (223 per group) patients. There was no difference in LOS by approach in the Whipple group (p = 0.546). The median LOS was 9 (IQR 7-15), Open and 8 (IQR 6-13), MIS. For Distal, there was a difference in LOS in the Open versus MIS approach (p < 0.01) and the median LOS was 6 (IQR 5-8) and 5 (IQR 4-6). CONCLUSIONS: Among octogenarians the MIS approach was associated with decreased LOS in distal pancreatectomies, but not in pancreaticoduodenectomies.

Italian survey about intraperitoneal drain use in distal pancreatectomy.

Intraperitoneal prophylactic drain (IPD) use in distal pancreatectomy (DP) is still controversial. A survey was carried out through the Italian community of pancreatic surgeons using institutional emails, Twitter, and Facebook accounts of the Italian Association for the Study of the Pancreas (AISP) and the Italian Association of Hepato-biliary-pancreatic Surgery (AICEP). The survey was structured to learn surgeons' practice in using IPD through questions and one clinical vignette. Respondents were asked to report their regrets for omission and commission regarding the IPD use for the clinical scenario, eliciting a scale between 0 (no regret) and 100 (maximum regret). The threshold model and a multilevel mixed regression were built to identify respondents' attitudes. One hundred six surgeons completed the survey. Sixty-three (59.4%) respondents confirmed using at least 1 drain, while 43 (40.6%) placed 2 IPDs. Only 13 respondents (12.3%) declared a change in IPD strategy in patients at high risk of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF), while 9 (9.4%) respondents changed their strategy in low-risk POPF situations. Thirty-five (35.5%) respondents declared they would remove the IPD within the third postoperative day (POD) in the absence of CR-POPF suspicion. The median omission regret, which proved to be the wrong decision, was 80 (50-100, IQR). The median regret due to the commission of IPD, which turned out to be useless, was 2.5 (1-20, IQR). The CR-POPF probability threshold at which drainage omission was the less regrettable choice was 7% (1-35, IQR). The threshold to perceive drain omission as the least regrettable choice was higher in female surgeons (P < 0.001), in surgeons who modulated the strategies based on the risk of CR-POPF, and in high volume centers (p = 0.039). The threshold was lower in surgeons who performed minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (P < 0.001), adopted a closed system (P < 0.001), placed two IPDs (P < 0.001), or perceived the IPD as important to prevent reintervention (p = 0.047). Drain management after DP remains very heterogeneous among surgeons. The regret model suggested that IPD omission could be performed in low-risk patients (7% of CR-POPF), leading to low regret in the case of the wrong decision, making it an acceptable clinical decision.

A Resected Case of Simultaneous Gastric and Multiple Pancreatic Metastases of Renal Cell Carcinoma 11 Years After Nephrectomy.

A 50-year-old man with a history of nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) 11 years prior was diagnosed with gastric and multiple pancreatic metastases of RCC. He underwent a pyloric gastrectomy and total pancreatic resection. RCC metastases to the pancreas are rare, and gastric metastases are even rarer. This case represents a rare instance of simultaneous RCC metastases to both the stomach and pancreas. Although there is no difference in prognosis between solitary and multiple pancreatic metastases, surgical resection is recommended even for multiple lesions. However, preoperative imaging often fails to identify all pancreatic metastatic lesions, making total pancreatectomy a consideration for ensuring complete resection, especially when preoperative detection is challenging.

Successful Use of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Management of Nonobstructive Recurrent Cholangitis Following Total Pancreatectomy and Islet Autotransplant.

Alterations in the gut microbiome have been implicated in various pathologies. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been offered as a novel treatment for conditions implicated in the disruption of the gut-microbiota axis. This case report details the successful treatment of recurrent nonobstructive cholangitis following a single FMT application in a patient who had previously undergone a hepatobiliary tract surgical diversion. Cholangitis was suspected secondary to reflux of an altered microbiome into the surgically reanastomosed biliary tract, and FMT was justified based on the history of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infections. This case supports the further evaluation of the utility of FMT as one potential treatment of post hepatobiliary surgical diversion cholangitis.

A case of robotic distal pancreatectomy for solitary fibrous tumor of the pancreas.

Solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) is a spindle cell tumor driven by the NAB2-STAT6 fusion gene. While it can originate from any soft tissue, primary SFT of the pancreas is rare with limited reports. A 36-year-old man came to our department due to abdominal pain. Computed tomography revealed a circular mass with weak peripheral enhancement and an internal cyst in the pancreatic tail. Diagnosis was not confirmed through endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy, and differential diagnoses included acinar cell carcinoma and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. A robotic distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy was performed, and the patient was discharged 11 days postoperatively. Histopathological examination showed an irregular arrangement of spindle cells, and immunohistochemical staining was positive for CD34 and STAT6, confirming an SFT diagnosis with low metastatic risk. Robotic surgery effectively managed this tumor.

Trajectories of perioperative nutritional status in patients with pancreatic tumor after surgery in six months.

PURPOSE: To characterize subgroups with similar nutritional status trajectories during the 6-month period after pancreatectomy and to identify demographic and clinical characteristics influencing changes in nutritional status in each subgroup. METHODS: This longitudinal prospective study recruited 112 patients with newly diagnosed pancreatic tumor from an outpatient pancreatic surgical department of a medical center in northern Taiwan between September 2016 and April 2019. Patients completed a demographic and clinical characteristics form, the Mini Nutritional Assessment scale, and the Symptom Severity Scale prior to surgery (T0), 3 months after surgery (T1), and 6 months after surgery (T2). Latent class growth analysis was used to investigate the trajectories of nutritional status. Generalized estimating equations were used to identify significant factors influencing each trajectory. RESULTS: Two latent groups of nutritional status trajectories were identified. Among 112 patients, 74.11% and 25.89% were classified as having high and low nutritional status trajectories, respectively. High nutritional status was significantly negatively correlated with changes in symptom severity. Low nutritional status was significantly negatively correlated with older age, surgical complications, and changes in symptom severity. CONCLUSIONS: Symptom severity has the most significant negative effect on perioperative nutritional status. Older age and surgical complications exert negative effects on perioperative nutritional status among patients with low nutritional status. These findings emphasize the need for nurses to identify at-risk individuals and provide individualized nutritional care to improve nutritional status in this population. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: This study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (trial registration number: NCT02900677; approved date: September 14th, 2016). Link: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02900677.

Abdominal drainage after minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: out of sight, out of mind?

BACKGROUNDS: The use of drains in pancreatic surgery remains controversial. The present study investigated postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) without intraperitoneal drain placement. METHODS: Data of consecutive patients undergoing MIDP between 2013 and 2023 were prospectively collected. Patients were divided in drain group (DG), including patients with prophylactic abdominal drain placed, and no-drain group (NDG) including those without drain. The groups were compared in terms of postoperative outcomes, using a propensity score-matched analysis. RESULTS: 116 patients were selected. After matching, DG and NDG consisted of 29 patients each. The rates of POPF and abdominal collection were lower in NDG in comparison to DG (3.4% vs. 27.6%, p 0.025 and 3.4% vs. 31.0%, p 0.011, respectively). The length of stay was significantly shorter in the NDG (5 vs. 9 days, p < 0.001). No difference between the groups was found for other outcomes. CONCLUSION: Drain omission was associated with lower rates of POPF and abdominal collections, as well as shorter hospital stays, not affecting the rate of severe complication, reoperation and readmission.

The prevalence and risk factors associated with zinc deficiency after pancreatic surgery.

PURPOSE: To clarify the prevalence, risk factors, and clinical implications associated with zinc deficiency in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery. METHODS: The serum zinc levels were measured in 329 patients post-pancreatic surgery between January and April 2021. The postoperative serum zinc levels and clinicopathological variables were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The median serum zinc level was 73 µg/dL (33-218). Zinc deficiency (zinc level < 60 µg/dL) was observed in 52 patients (16%). A total of 329 patients were classified into zinc-deficient (n = 52) and non-deficient (zinc ≥ 60 µg/dL, n = 277) groups. A univariate analysis revealed significant differences in sex, postoperative body mass index, serum albumin, total cholesterol, creatinine, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), HbA1c levels, diabetes, surgical procedures, and operative blood loss. According to a multivariate analysis, male sex [odds ratio (OR) 3.70; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.67-8.20; p = 0.001], postoperative serum albumin levels < 3.9 g/dL (OR 6.39; 95% CI 3.30-12.37; p < 0.001), postoperative serum AST ≥ 51 U/L (OR, 4.6; 95% CI 0.07-0.29; p < 0.001), and total pancreatectomy (OR 3.68; 95% CI 1.37-9.85; p = 0.009) were found to be independent predictors of zinc deficiency after pancreatic surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Zinc deficiency frequently occurs in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery. Lower postoperative zinc levels could be linked to sex, the serum albumin and AST levels, and surgery type.

Increased kidney stone risk following total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is associated with increased risk of calcium-oxalate kidney stones, likely due to enteric hyperoxaluria. However, the risk of kidney stones for patients with CP after total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation (TPIAT) is unknown. We aimed to evaluate kidney stone risk in patients with CP after TPIAT. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 629 patients who underwent TPIAT was conducted to identify patients who developed kidney stones post-TPIAT. Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated time to first event. An Anderson-Gill proportional-hazards analysis of all kidney stone events described key clinical associations. RESULTS: Mean age at TPIAT was 33 years (SD 15.3, range 3-69); 69.8 % (n = 439) were female. The estimated chance of any kidney stone episodes by 5 years post-TPIAT was 12.8 % (95 % CI: 8.8-16.6 %); by 10 years, 23.2 % (CI: 17.5-28.6 %); by 15 years, 29.4 % (CI: 21.8-36.2 %). Significant associations with kidney stones post-TPIAT included older age (HR 1.25 per 10 years), smoking history (HR 1.72), mild chronic kidney disease (HR 1.96), renal cysts (HR 3.67), pre-TPIAT kidney stones (HR 4.06), family history of kidney stones (HR 4.10), and Roux-en-Y reconstruction (HR 2.68). Of the 77 patients who developed kidney stones, 34 (44.1 %) had recurrent episodes. Of 143 total kidney stone events, 35 (24.5 %) required stone removal, 79 (55.2 %) resolved spontaneously, and 29 (20.3 %) were missing this data. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CP post-TPIAT commonly have kidney stones: nearly 3 in 10 have ≥1 kidney stone episodes within 15 years. Clinicians should be aware of this risk and counsel patients on prevention.

A Review of the Indications, Outcomes, and Postoperative Management After Total and Completion Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Cancer: More Is Not Necessarily Better.

With improvements in surgical technique and advances in pancreatic endocrine and exocrine replacement therapy, the indications for, and threshold to perform, total or completion pancreatectomy in the modern surgical era are ever evolving. The following review will evaluate such indications for pancreatic cancer including pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. The authors also review the literature on oncologic outcomes of total and completion pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer. Finally, they discuss the quality of life and postoperative management of the a-pancreatic state.

The Role of Surgery in "Oligometastatic" Pancreas Cancer.

The majority of patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer already have metastatic disease at the time of presentation, which results in a 5-year survival rate of only 13%. However, multiagent chemotherapy regimens can stabilize the disease in select patients with limited metastatic disease. For such patients, a combination of curative-intent therapy and systemic therapy may potentially enhance outcomes compared to using systemic therapy alone. Of note, the evidence supporting this approach is primarily derived from retrospective studies and may carry a significant selection bias. Looking ahead, ongoing prospective trials are exploring the efficacy of curative-intent therapy in managing oligometastatic pancreatic cancer and the implementation of treatment strategies based on specific biomarkers. The emergence of these trials, coupled with the development of less invasive therapeutic modalities, provides hope for patients with oligometastatic pancreatic cancer.