Low-dose caudal versus dorsal penile nerve block for postoperative analgesia after circumcision: a randomized comparative study.

INTRODUCTION: Paediatric male circumcision is a painful surgical procedure, which is usually carried out under general anaesthesia. Regional analgesic techniques, including dorsal penile nerve block (DPNB) and caudal nerve block (CNB), are superior to opioid and non-opioid systemic analgesia for postoperative pain control after circumcision. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The purpose of our study was to compare the efficacy, duration of postoperative analgesia, and complications of DPNB, CNB, and the combination of 2 blocks. Eighty-one male patients aged from 3 to 12 years scheduled for circumcision were distributed into 3 groups, each consisting of 27 patients; group 1 (DPNB group), group 2 (CNB group), and group 3 for combined blockade. This study compared the 3 groups in terms of intraoperative vital signs: heart rate and blood pressure, postoperative Wong-Baker score, and complications (nausea, vomiting, pruritus, urinary retention, and constipation). RESULTS: The intraoperative haemodynamics did not differ between the 3 groups of the study. There is significant difference in the Wong-Baker scale postoperatively at 1, 3, and 24 hours, being significantly less in the CNB group and combined blockade group than in the DPNB group, but there was no significant difference between the CNB group and the combined blockade group. The incidence of complications showed no significant intergroup difference, except for urinary retention being lower with DPNB. CONCLUSIONS: Both caudal and combined blockade were superior to DPNB for intraoperative and postoperative analgesia after circumcision. CNB and combined blockade was associated with significantly higher incidence of urinary retention compared to DPNB. Also, there was no additional benefit to the analgesic efficacy from combining both blocks.

Caudal anesthesia is not associated with post-operative complications following distal hypospadias repair.

INTRODUCTION: The use of caudal anesthesia at the time of hypospadias repair remains controversial as some prior studies have reported increased postoperative complication rates associated with caudal nerve block. However, these results have been called into question due to confounding factors and heterogeneous study groups. OBJECTIVE: Given the importance of identifying true risk factors associated with increased hypospadias complication rate, we examined our experience with caudal anesthesia limiting our analysis to distal repairs. We hypothesized that caudal anesthesia would not be associated with increased postoperative complications. STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed our institutional hypospadias database from June 2007 to January 2021. All boys who underwent single-stage distal hypospadias repair with either caudal or penile block with minimum 1 month follow up were included. Records were reviewed to determine the type of local anesthesia, type of hypospadias repair, all complications, and time to complication. Association between any complication and local anesthesia type was evaluated by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis controlling for age at surgery and type of repair. A sub-analysis was performed for complications occurring ≤30 days. RESULTS: Overall, 1008 boys, 832 (82.5%) who received caudal and 176 (17.5%) penile block, were included. Median age at surgery was 8.1 months and median follow up was 13 months. Overall complication rate was 16.4% with 13.8% of patients requiring repeat operation. Median time to complication was 10.59 months and was significantly shorter in the caudal group (8.45 vs. 25.2 months). Caudal anesthesia was associated with higher likelihood of complication on univariate analysis; however, this was not true on multivariate analysis when controlling for age and type of repair. Caudal anesthesia was not associated with increased likelihood of complication within 30 days. DISCUSSION: Since the association between caudal anesthesia and hypospadias complications was first suggested, several studies have tried to answer this question with variable results. Our findings add to the evidence that there is no association between caudal anesthesia and increased hypospadias complications in either the short or long term. The major strengths of our study are a large, homogenous study population, robust follow up and inclusion of data from 14 surgeons over 14 years. Limitations include the study's retrospective nature as well as lack of standardized follow up protocol throughout the study period. CONCLUSIONS: After controlling for possible confounders, caudal nerve block was not associated with increased risk of postoperative complications following distal hypospadias repair.

Dorsal penile block versus caudal epidural anesthesia effect on complications post-hypospadias repair: Dilemmas, damned dilemmas and statistics.

The evidence examining the effects of regional blocks on complications posthypospadias repair has been controversial. Nine observational studies have been published thus far, with inconsistent and somewhat contradictory results. In this educational article, we attempt to explain the concepts of study accuracy and precision in the context of the hypospadias literature to shed some light on the reasons behind those controversies. Methodological issues such as selection bias, confounding effect, sample size, confidence interval and study generalizability from studies involving dorsal penile block versus caudal epidural anesthesia in hypospadias repair are discussed.

Efficacy and safety of dorsal penile nerve block before collagenase of clostridium histolyticum injections in peyronie's disease patients: Results from a prospective pilot study.

The intraplaque injection of collagenase from Clostridium Histolyticum (CCH) was established as an effective therapeutic alternative for selected patients with Peyronie's disease (PD). There is no consensus on the use of pre-procedure anaesthesia. The aim of this pilot study was to assess the efficacy and safety of dorsal penile block before CCH injections in reducing procedure related pain. The treatment protocol described in the IMPRESS trials was adopted. The first injection of the first cycle was given without anaesthesia, while the second after penile block. After the administration of each injection, the pain related to the procedure was evaluated with the Wong-Baker-FACES® -Pain-Rating-Scale. Thirty patients were included. Mean age 56.7 (SD: 9.61) years. Mean basal penile curvature 59.37º (SD: 18.26). The mean pain value related to the procedure measured after the first injection of the first cycle (without anaesthesia) was 5.4 (SD: 2.13), while after the second injection (with anaesthesia) was 2.5 (SD: 1.92), (p < .001). The treatment was more painful in patients with dorsal plaques (mean:6.2) than in patients with lateral plaques (mean: 4.35) (p = .01). We can conclude that penile block before CCH injection in patients with PD seems an effective and safe measure to decrease the pain related to the procedure.

Penile nerve block predicts higher revision surgery rate following distal hypospadias repair when compared with caudal epidural block: A consecutive cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Recent literature has suggested caudal epidural blocks (CEB) may increase revision surgery rates following hypospadias repair. We sought to investigate this using a large, multi-surgeon series. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to identify the impact of CEB or penile nerve blocks (PNB) on revision surgery rates following distal hypospadias repair at our centre. STUDY DESIGN: A prospectively maintained database of consecutive patients undergoing primary hypospadias repairs under the supervision of 8 different paediatric surgeons at our centre between January 2015 and December 2018 was queried for the following potential risk factors: Age at surgery, American Society of Anaesthesiologist's (ASA) grade, hypospadias type, type of surgery, CEB or PNB, and training level of primary surgeon. Revision surgery was defined as reoperation for fistulas, dehiscence, strictures or meatal stenosis. Univariate and Multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression. RESULTS: 188 patients underwent primary distal hypospadias repair over the study time period. Patients were aged between 7 months and 15 years of age. Median age at surgery was 14 months. Revision surgery was performed for 31 patients (16.5%). Indications were urethrocutaneous fistula (n = 17, 9.0%), meatal stenosis or stricture (n = 9, 4.8%) and glans dehiscence (n = 5, 2.7%). 114 (60.6%) received a penile block and 74 (39.4%) a caudal block. On univariate analysis, PNB (HR 2.55 95% CI 1.04-6.27, p = 0.04) was statistically significant for revision surgery. This association remained significant on multivariate analysis (HR 2.74 95% CI 1.09-6.92, p = 0.03). All other prognostic factors examined were not statistically significant for revision surgery. DISCUSSION: Our findings suggest PNB are associated with higher revision surgery rates following distal hypospadias repair. This contrasts with the findings of other authors. CONCLUSION: Our study is the first to demonstrate an association between PNB and higher revision surgery rates following distal hypospadias repair.

Ultrasound-guided dorsal penile nerve block vs neurostimulator-guided pudendal nerve block in children undergoing hypospadias surgery: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hypospadias is a common congenital malformation in pediatric patients. Surgical repair of this malformation is a painful procedure and has long-term effects. Pudendal and penile nerve blocks are commonly preferred techniques for maintaining postoperative analgesia. However, the conventional landmark-based penile block technique involves numerous potential complications and provides a shorter analgesic period compared to the pudendal block. A promising ultrasound-guided dorsal penile nerve block was recently described. We aimed to compare the analgesic effectiveness of ultrasound-guided penile nerve block with that of neurostimulator-guided pudendal nerve block. METHOD: Thirty-three patients aged 1-7 years were included in this prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Patients were divided into two groups and received either ultrasound-guided dorsal penile nerve block or neurostimulator-guided pudendal nerve block. All blocks were performed by the same two anesthesiologists, and the same surgeons performed the surgical procedures. The Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) scale was used for postoperative pain management. The primary outcome of the study was time to first analgesic requirement. Secondary outcomes were FLACC scores at different time points, and types and cumulative doses of analgesic drugs. RESULTS: Dorsal penile nerve block provided longer analgesia than pudendal nerve block (32.29 ± 5.47 hours and 21.13 ± 3.53 hours, respectively; differences in mean: 11.16, 95% CI: 7.873-14.465) (P < .001). FLACC scores at the time of first analgesic requirement were significantly lower in dorsal penile nerve block group than pudendal nerve block group (median [IQR]: 2 [2-2.5] and 3 [3-5], respectively; differences in median: -1, 95% CI: -1.851 to -0.149) (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided dorsal penile nerve block provided a longer analgesic period and reduced opioid consumption compared to neurostimulator-guided pudendal nerve block.

Can regional anesthesia have an effect on surgical outcomes in patients undergoing distal hypospadia surgery?

BACKGROUND: Caudal and penile blocks are the most popular regional anesthetic techniques used in infants and children undergoing urological surgery. A recent report has suggested that penile venous pooling resulting from caudal blocks could affect surgical outcomes after hypospadias operations. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to report our experience in patients with distal hypospadias undergoing repair with caudal versus penile block. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective clinical database was constructed for patients who underwent distal hypospadias repair by a single surgeon (M.P.B.) at our sponsoring institutions for the time period 2008-2013 (n = 192). Collected data included hypospadias classification (glanular, coronal, subcoronal), chordee status, perioperative anesthesia (caudal vs. penile), and assessment of postoperative complications (fistula and meatal stenosis). RESULTS: Risk ratio (RR) analysis for all distal hypospadias cases revealed that there is a higher risk of developing complications in patients who underwent caudal anesthesia than in patients who underwent penile block RR for a complication was 3.70 (95% CI 1.05-13.03; p < 0.04) (Figure). DISCUSSION: Similar to other papers in the literature, we found that patients who underwent caudal anesthesia had more complications than those who underwent penile block. The limitations of this study include not adjusting the results according to the severity of hypospadias. CONCLUSION: The main goal of this study was accomplished by demonstrating that, in our series, caudal anesthesia is associated with a higher risk of fistula formation after undergoing distal hypospadias repair than penile block.

Self-Inflicted Nailgun-Induced Penetrating Penile Injury: Case Report and Discussion.

Penetrating penile injuries occur mostly in industrial/work accidents, automobile accidents, or as a result of sexual curiosity and attempts at self-expression/mutilation. In this case report, the authors describe an accidental nailgun injury to the penis of a 46-year-old man. We discuss the management of such injuries in the emergency department, including the utility of a dorsal penile block for regional anesthesia. Although exceptionally rare, familiarity with penetrating lower urinary tract injuries may reduce their long-term repercussions on genitourinary and sexual health.

Investigation of the effect of dorsal penile block to penile tissue.

BACKGROUND: Dorsal penile block (DPB) is a frequently used technique for regional anesthesia, but the effect of DPB on penile tissue has not been reported so far. OBJECTIVE: An experimental study was conducted to evaluate the acute effects of DPB on penile tissue. METHODS: Eighteen male rats were included and randomly assigned to three groups. No intervention was made in the control group (CG, n = 6). In the sham group (SG, n = 6) 1 ml normal saline, and in DPB group (PBG, n = 6) 1 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine without adrenaline (0.5 mg/kg), was infused with a 30 mm, 23 gauge needle. DPB was performed by inserting the needle in the midline when pulling down the penis and directing the needle to the 11 and 1 o'clock positions. Another puncture was done at the midline on the ventral side and the remaining drug was infused slowly. The penile tissues were harvested for biochemical (malonyldialdehyde: MDA; nitric oxide: NO; superoxide dismutase: SOD) and histopathological examination. Histopathological assessments were made of inflammation, edema and fibrosis; epithelial degradation in the urethra; vascular obliteration in periurethral tissue; and the peripheral nerve cells. RESULTS: Concentrations of NO and SOD were significantly decreased in the PBG compared with the CG and SG (p < 0.05). The concentration of MDA was significantly increased in the PBG compared with the CG and SG (p < 0.05) (Table). Histopathological examination revealed no significant difference between groups regarding edema, inflammation, or fibrosis (p > 0.05). In hematoxylin and eosin stain samples, vascular structures of the corpus cavernosa were slightly decreased in number in the SG and PBG compared with the CG, but that difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The S-100 staining was significantly higher in the PBG and SG compared with the CG (p < 0.05), and significantly higher in the SG compared with the PBG (p < 0.05). DISCUSSION: DPB causes alteration in oxidative stress markers because of an unknown effect. Although the results revealed increased inflammatory reaction in penile tissue after DPB, they are not enough to suggest not using bupivacaine for DPB in clinical practice. CONCLUSION: Although DPB does not cause any major histopathological alteration, it results in an increase in inflammatory response in the penile tissue in the short term.

The impact of the application of a penile block before circumcision on the postoperative FLACC score and analgesic requirement.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the effect of the application of a penile block before circumcision on the postoperative Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) score and analgesic requirement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study, 240 patients with an age range of 1-9 years who were circumcised between April 2012 and August 2012 were included in this study. Penile block was applied in only 125 of 240 patients (Group 1) and for the remaining 115 patients penile block was not performed (Group 2). Both groups were compared in terms of age, operation times, FLACC score and analgesic requirements. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 4.8±2.1 years in Group 1 and 5.3±3.1 years in Group 2 (p=0.126). Mean operating time was 14.9±5.1 min in Group 1 and 15.2±6.2 min in Group 2 (p=0.242). The mean FLACC score of the patients was 3.1±1.9 (0-6) in Group 1 and 6.4±3.3 (3-10) in Group 2 (p<0.05). Postoperative analgesic was required in 20 patients (16%) in Group 1, and 75 patients (65%) in Group 2. Early complications were not observed in any patients. CONCLUSION: We detected a significantly lower postoperative analgesic requirement and a mean FLACC score in patients who had been treated with application of a penile block before circumcision.

Penile block for paediatric urological surgery: A comparative evaluation with general anaesthesia.

AIM: Peri-operative pain relief in children can be provided by conventional general anaesthesia or by regional nerve blocks. The present study was carried out to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of penile block for penile surgery with the standard technique of general anaesthesia (GA) of short duration of less than two hours, and also to evaluate the postoperative pain relief obtained by penile block. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was carried out in the department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive care of our hospital, on 60 children in the age group of 1-10 years, belonging to American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grades I and II, and divided randomly into two groups: Group B and group G, comprising of 30 patients each. Group B children received a penile block whereas group G children underwent a standard general anaesthetic procedure. Baseline, intra-operative and post-operative heart rate (HR), electrocardiogram (ECG), non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) (systolic and diastolic) and pulse oximeter oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) were recorded at regular intervals. The duration of post-operative pain relief, time to rescue analgesia and time to first feed were also evaluated and recorded. Statistical analysis was carried out using statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) 11 version for windows and employing analysis of variance (ANOVA), unpaired student t test, Chi-square test and Mann Whitney U test for various parameters. Value of P<0.05 was considered as significant and P<0.0001 as highly significant. RESULTS: The demographic characteristics were comparable in both the groups. Heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and pulse oximetry showed remarkable differences at various time intervals during intra-operative and post-operative period, which were statistically significant on comparison (P<0.05 and P<0.0001). Post-operative pain relief, time to first rescue analgesia and time to first feed also showed statistically significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: Penile block is very effective when used along with light sedation for distal penile surgeries of less than 2 hours duration as compared to standard GA as reflected by more stable haemodynamics in peri-operative period, excellent pain relief extending up to 6-8 hrs postoperatively and absence of any significant complications or side effects.