Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 22
Filter
1.
J Belg Soc Radiol ; 108(1): 73, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39219810

ABSTRACT

Teaching point: Aortoenteric fistula, a major complication of aortic surgery, can be identified with certainty on CT scan with opacification of the intestinal tract.

2.
J Clin Orthop Trauma ; 53: 102472, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39055392

ABSTRACT

Shoulder arthroplasty has become a standard surgical procedure for treating a variety of complex shoulder disorders, including those with degenerative and traumatic aetiologies. The ever-improving success rates of shoulder arthroplasty could be attributed to advancements in endoprosthesis design, improvements in the biomechanics of endoprosthetic components, and improvements in surgical techniques. It improves patient outcomes and helps restore shoulder joint function and mobility. Imaging plays a vital role by enabling surgeons to plan arthroplasty procedures, help guide endoprosthesis placement, and monitor postoperative outcomes. In addition, imaging plays a role in assessing the residual bone stock and status of rotator cuff integrity and in correcting the placement of prosthetic components to restore shoulder mobility. CT-guided navigation aids surgeons by helping them choose appropriate components for implants and ensuring that implants are placed optimally during surgery. It can lead to better surgical results with reduced patient morbidity and a longer duration of prosthetic stability. After surgery, it is crucial to use imaging techniques to detect issues such as periprosthetic loosening, infections, or fractures to start effective management strategies to enhance patient recovery. This article aims to provide orthopaedic surgeons and radiologists with knowledge on the imaging methods used in shoulder arthroplasty and their role in presurgical planning, intraoperative guidance and postoperative assessment. In this study, we aimed to investigate the rationale behind utilising various types of shoulder replacements: total shoulder replacement (TSA), reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA), and hemiarthroplasty; methods, their respective advantages and limitations; and outcomes. Our objective is to comprehensively analyse the procedures mentioned above and highlight their unique features and benefits to facilitate a better understanding of these approaches. Additionally, we will discuss how these imaging techniques help identify issues such as loose components, fractures around the implant site, joint instability and infections.

3.
Surgeon ; 22(2): 107-115, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37951800

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite a recent Cochrane Review demonstrating blunt suture needles are safer for surgeons, the use of blunt suture needles has not become widely adopted. In the 'Implant Era', with the value of medical implant companies to surpass $145 billion by 2027, should we re-examine the use of blunt suture needles, especially to reduce infection in implant surgery? We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing whether blunt suture needles reduce risks to surgeons and patients. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed per PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Cochrane and EMBASE databases were searched for RCTs. Dichotomous variables were pooled as risk ratios (RR) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) using the MH method. Random or fixed effects modelling use was based on statistical heterogeneity (I2). RESULTS: 14 RCTs were identified with 2488 patients. The RCTs included laparotomies, caesarean sections, episiotomies, and orthopaedic surgeries. Blunt suture needles when compared with sharp needles resulted in a significant reduction in glove perforation; RR: 0.47, 95% CI [0.37 to 0.60] and needlestick injuries, RR: 0.50, 95% CI [0.26 to 0.97]. Sharp needles caused more wound infections, but the result was not statistically significant; RR: 2.73, 95% CI [0.54 to 13.76], p 0.22. Surgeon's satisfaction decreased with blunt needles compared with sharp (RR: 1.22, 95% CI [1.09 to 1.37]). CONCLUSION: Blunt suture needles are safer than sharp needles for surgeons and likely reduce risks to patients. This, however, comes at the cost of decreased ease of use. The authors recommend the routine use of blunt suture needles, especially in implant surgery.


Subject(s)
Needles , Needlestick Injuries , Female , Pregnancy , Humans , Needlestick Injuries/prevention & control , Cesarean Section , Laparotomy , Sutures
4.
Surg Infect (Larchmt) ; 24(5): 482-487, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37222729

ABSTRACT

Background: The wearing of male facial hair has been undergoing something of a renaissance for a number of years, with medical colleagues in the surgical disciplines being no exception. Meanwhile, there are a few reports in the literature that beards might have an increased bacterial colonization. This study aims to determine if wearing a beard leads to an increased rate of infection in total hip or knee arthroplasty. Patients and Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 20,394 primary hip and knee replacements that were implanted at a single university hospital. The rate of infections that occurred within one year after surgery and the surgeons performing the surgery were recorded. The surgeons were classified into clean-shaven and beard wearers. The beard wearers were further classified by individual facial hair styles, namely a moustache, chin beard, round beard, or full beard. Results: The overall rate of surgical site infections 365 days after surgery is 0.75%. There was no statistically significant association between surgical site infection and the presence of facial hair (p = 0.774) or specific beard types (p = 0.298). Conclusions: The results presented in this study show no differences in infection rates across different facial hair styles of male surgeons.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Communicable Diseases , Hair , Surgeons , Surgical Wound Infection , Humans , Male , Face , Incidence , Retrospective Studies , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology
5.
J Pers Med ; 12(12)2022 Dec 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36556274

ABSTRACT

Peri-prosthetic breast infections pose a risk of severe complications after breast implant surgery. The need to remove the breast implant, control the infection and perform additional surgical procedures are the consequences. Reimplantation of an alloplastic implant is only appropriate after an infection-free interval. In this retrospective cohort study, we investigated the effectiveness of negative pressure wound treatment with instillation and dwell time (NPWTi-d) on peri-prosthetic breast infections in combination with implant removal and antibiotic therapy. Twelve patients treated with NPWTi-d due to breast implant infection were included in the study. The bacterial burden was analyzed using wound swabs before and after NPWTi-d. Additionally, laboratory values were determined before NPWTi-d and immediately before wound closure. A total of 13 peri-prosthetic breast infections in 12 patients were treated using implant removal and NPWTi-d. In 76.9% (n = 10) of the cases, the patients had undergone alloplastic breast reconstruction following cancer-related mastectomy, whereas 23.1% (n = 3) of the patients had undergone breast augmentation for cosmetic reasons. The bacterial burden in the breast pocket decreased statistically significant after implant removal and NPWTi-d. No shift from Gram-positive to Gram-negative bacteria was observed. Inflammatory markers rapidly decreased following treatment. NPWTi-d had a positive impact on the healing process after peri-prosthetic breast infections, leading to a decrease in bacterial burden within the wounds and contributing to uneventful healing. Therefore, secondary reimplantation of breast prostheses might be positively influenced when compared to conventional implant removal and simple secondary closure. Further studies are required to conclusively establish the beneficial long-term effects of using NPWTi-d for the treatment of peri-prosthetic breast infections.

6.
Surg Infect (Larchmt) ; 23(7): 645-655, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35925775

ABSTRACT

Background: The number of primary/revision total joint replacements (TJR) are expected to increase substantially with an aging population and increasing prevalence of comorbid conditions. The 30-day re-admission rate, in all orthopedic specialties, is 5.4% (range, 4.8%-6.0%). A recent publication has documented that the surgical site infection (SSI) infection rate associated with revision total knee (rTKR, 15.6%) and revision total hip (rTHR, 8.6%) arthroplasties are four to seven times the rate of the primary procedures (2.1%-2.2%). These orthopedic infections prolong hospital stays, double re-admissions, and increase healthcare costs by a factor of 300%. Methods: A search of PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library publications, which reported the infection risk after TKR and THR, was undertaken (January 1, 1995 to December 31, 2021). The search also included documentation of evidence-based practices that lead to improved post-operative outcomes. Results: The evidence-based approach to reducing the risk of SSI was grouped into pre-operative, peri-operative, and post-operative periods. Surgical care bundles have existed within other surgical disciplines for more than 20 years, although their use is relatively new in peri-operative orthopedic surgical care. Pre-admission chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) showers/cleansing, staphylococcal decolonization, maintenance of normothermia, wound irrigation, antimicrobial suture wound closure, and post-operative wound care has been shown to improve clinical outcome in randomized controlled studies and meta-analyses. Conclusions: Evidence-based infection prevention care bundles have improved clinical outcomes in all surgical disciplines. The significant post-operative morbidity, mortality, and healthcare cost, associated with SSIs after TJR can be reduced by introduction of evidence-based pre-operative, intra-operative, and post-operative interventions.


Subject(s)
Orthopedic Procedures , Patient Care Bundles , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Humans , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Therapeutic Irrigation/methods
7.
J Pers Med ; 11(10)2021 Oct 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34683181

ABSTRACT

Peri-prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) dramatically affect human health, as they are associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Two-stage revision arthroplasty is currently the gold standard treatment for PJI and consists of infected implant removal, an accurate debridement, and placement of antimicrobial impregnated poly-methyl-metha-acrylate (PMMA) spacer. The use of antibiotic-loaded PMMA (ALPMMA) spacers have showed a success rate that ranges from 85% to 100%. ALPMMA spacers, currently available on the market, demonstrate a series of disadvantages, closely linked to a low propensity to customize, seen as the ability to adapt to the patients' anatomical characteristics, with consequential increase of surgical complexity, surgery duration, and post-operative complications. Conventionally, ALPMMA spacers are available only in three or four standard sizes, with the impossibility of guaranteeing the perfect matching of ALPMMA spacers with residual bone (no further bone loss) and gap filling. In this paper, a 3D model of an ALPMMA spacer is introduced to evaluate the cause- effect link between the geometric characteristics and the correlated clinical improvements. The result is a multivariable-oriented design able to effectively manage the size, alignment, stability, and the patients' anatomical matching. The preliminary numerical results, obtained by using an "ad hoc" 3D virtual planning simulator, clearly point out that to restore the joint line, the mechanical and rotational alignment and the surgeon's control on the thicknesses (distal and posterior thicknesses) of the ALPMMA spacer is mandatory. The numerical simulations campaign involved nineteen patients grouped in three different scenarios (Case N° 1, Case N° 2 and Case N° 3) whose 3D bone models were obtained through an appropriate data management strategy. Each scenario is characterized by a different incidence rate. In particular, the observed rates of occurrence are, respectively, equal to 17% (Case N° 1), 74% (Case N° 2), and 10% (Case N° 3).

8.
J Clin Orthop Trauma ; 11(Suppl 5): S772-S778, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32999554

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The number of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) is continuously increasing because of the increasing number of arthroprostheses performed every year. Two-stage revision, using antibiotic-loaded spacers, remains the gold standard for their treatment. The aim of our study is to compare the use of preformed vs hand-made spacers in hip arthroplasty infections evaluating infection eradication, bone loss and clinical/functional outcomes. METHODS: From January 2010 to December 2017 we performed a prospective nonrandomized study. We pooled 50 patients affected by infected hip joint replacements, and divided them in 2 groups, one receiving commercially preformed spacers and the other receiving hand-made spacers. The study endpoint was set at 12 months. Intra-operative and peri-operative complications, Harris Hip Score (HHS), Short Form 12 Health Survey, intra-operative and radiological evaluation of bone loss were collected. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, T-test and Fisher Exact test. RESULTS: We found a statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between the two groups in favour of the VancogenX group for the following variables: surgical time, first and second stage intraoperative complication rates, infection eradication. Moreover, the preformed-spacers group had better results in the preservation of bone stock, even though the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our results support the use of preformed antibiotic spacers, even though more studies are needed.

9.
HSS J ; 16(3): 272-279, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33082722

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Peri-prosthetic shoulder infection (PSI), a highly disabling complication of shoulder arthroplasty, often requires additional surgery and prolonged antibiotic therapy. Of strategies proposed to manage this devastating condition, the use of cement spacers, perhaps even as a definitive treatment, is debated. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We sought to systematically review the literature on antibiotic-loaded cement spacers as a viable, perhaps definitive, treatment for PSI, evaluating the eradication rates, mechanical reliability, and functional results related to its use. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of studies published from January 1, 1980, through September 1, 2019. Following the Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews of Interventions and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, we searched for studies reporting functional and clinical outcomes in patients with PSI treated with a permanent spacer of the shoulder. Two independent reviewers searched eight databases, as well as reference lists of the retrieved articles. RESULTS: After exclusion criteria were applied, 12 studies were included, involving a total of 143 patients. The mean age was 65.8 years; the mean follow-up was 37.4 months. A total of 133 patients (93%) were free from infection at latest follow-up. The mean post-operative active elevation of the shoulder ranged from 48.6 to 90°, the mean abduction ranged from 51 to 75°, and external rotation ranged from 3.6 to 29°. The mean Constant-Murley score ranged from 20.6 to 42 points (out of 100, from worst to best). CONCLUSION: The use of a permanent cement spacer is a reliable solution to PSI in low-demand, older patients with comorbidities, a population in whom it is desirable to avoid additional surgery. Our review found a high rate of infection eradication and moderate-to-good objective and subjective results. However, the overall level of evidence of included studies was very low, and higher-quality studies are needed to clarify the role of permanent spacers in the treatment of PSI.

10.
BMC Infect Dis ; 20(1): 236, 2020 Mar 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32192457

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Melioidosis-associated peri-prosthetic infection is extremely rare. To date, melioidosis associated septic arthritis of the ankle joint following a medial malleolar internal fixation has not been reported. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe a 49-year-old male with a history of long standing diabetes who presented with fever, constitutional symptoms and right ankle pain for 1 week. Ten years ago, he underwent a medial malleolar screw fixation following a traumatic closed fracture. His initial right ankle radiographs showed no evidence of osteomyelitis. He underwent a wound debridement and washout of the right ankle joint. The peripheral blood and pus from the ankle joint was culture positive for Burkholderia pseudomallei with very high antibody titres. His subsequent radiographs showed features of chronic osteomyelitis. He was treated with a prolonged course of antibiotics and repeated wound debridement. At follow up after 6 months, he had no clinical features of recurrent infection. CONCLUSIONS: Melioidosis should be entertained in the differential diagnosis of peri-prosthetic infections in high risk patients.


Subject(s)
Ankle Fractures/surgery , Ankle Joint/microbiology , Arthritis, Infectious/microbiology , Bone Screws/microbiology , Burkholderia pseudomallei/immunology , Fracture Fixation, Internal/adverse effects , Melioidosis/etiology , Osteomyelitis/microbiology , Ankle Joint/pathology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Infectious/drug therapy , Burkholderia pseudomallei/isolation & purification , Debridement , Diagnosis, Differential , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Melioidosis/diagnosis , Melioidosis/drug therapy , Melioidosis/microbiology , Middle Aged , Osteomyelitis/drug therapy , Radiography , Treatment Outcome
11.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res ; 103(2): 301-305, 2017 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28167248

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Whether pre-operative microbiological sampling contributes to the management of chronic peri-prosthetic infection remains controversial. We assessed agreement between the results of pre-operative and intra-operative samples in patients undergoing single-stage prosthesis exchange to treat chronic peri-prosthetic infection. HYPOTHESIS: Agreement between pre-operative and intra-operative samples exceeds 75% in patients undergoing single-stage exchange of a hip or knee prosthesis to treat chronic peri-prosthetic infection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This single-centre retrospective study included 85 single-stage prosthesis exchange procedures in 82 patients with chronic peri-prosthetic infection at the hip or knee. Agreement between pre-operative and intra-operative sample results was evaluated. Changes to the initial antibiotic regimen made based on the intra-operative sample results were recorded. RESULTS: Of 149 pre-operative samples, 109 yielded positive cultures, in 75/85 cases. Of 452 intra-operative samples, 354 yielded positive cultures, in 85/85 cases. Agreement was complete in 54 (63%) cases and partial in 9 (11%) cases; there was no agreement in the remaining 22 (26%) cases. The complete agreement rate was significantly lower than 75% (P=0.01). The initial antibiotic regimen was inadequate in a single case. DISCUSSION: Pre-operative sampling may contribute to the diagnosis of peri-prosthetic infection but is neither necessary nor sufficient to confirm the diagnosis and identify the causative agent. The spectrum of the initial antibiotic regimen cannot be safely narrowed based on the pre-operative sample results. We suggest the routine prescription of a probabilistic broad-spectrum antibiotic regimen immediately after the prosthesis exchange, even when a pathogen was identified before surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective study.


Subject(s)
Knee Prosthesis/microbiology , Prosthesis-Related Infections/microbiology , Prosthesis-Related Infections/surgery , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Chronic Disease , Female , Humans , Intraoperative Period , Male , Middle Aged , Preoperative Period , Prosthesis-Related Infections/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies
12.
J Orthop Res ; 35(10): 2211-2221, 2017 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27958656

ABSTRACT

Pigs are favorable experimental animals for infectious diseases in humans. However, implant-associated osteomyelitis (IAO) models in pigs have only been evaluated using high-inoculum infection (>108 CFU) models in 1975 and 1993. Therefore, the aim of this paper was to present a new low inoculum porcine model of human IAO based on 42 experimental pigs. The model was created by drilling an implant cavity in the tibial bone followed by insertion of a small steel implant and simultaneous inoculation of Staphylococcus aureus bacteria (n = 32) or saline (n = 10). The infected pigs were either inoculated with 104 CFU (n = 26) or 102 and 103 CFU (n = 6). All animals were euthanized 5 days after insertion of implants. Pigs receiving the high-inoculum infections showed a significantly higher volume of bone lesion, number of neutrophils around the implant, concentrations of acute phase proteins in serum, and enlargement of regional lymph nodes. A positive correlation was present between a high number of surrounding neutrophils and high values of all other parameters. Furthermore, a threshold of 40 neutrophils per 10 high power fields for the histopathological diagnosis of high grade IAO was defined. IN CONCLUSION: This paper describes a novel low-inoculum S. aureus porcine model of IAO which was demonstrated to be reliable, reproducible and discriminative to human IAO, and represents a requested and valuable tool in orthopedic research. © 2016 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 35:2211-2221, 2017.


Subject(s)
Disease Models, Animal , Osteomyelitis/etiology , Prosthesis-Related Infections/etiology , Animals , Female , Osteomyelitis/diagnostic imaging , Osteomyelitis/pathology , Prosthesis-Related Infections/diagnostic imaging , Prosthesis-Related Infections/pathology , Swine , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
13.
J Orthop Case Rep ; 6(1): 23-5, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27299119

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Tuberculosis (TB) still remains a common problem in the UK and, with the increasing number of patients being offered arthroplasties; periprosthetic involvement is not uncommon anymore. However, the diagnosis of TB infected arthroplasties still remains difficult and misdiagnosis is common, therefore delaying treatment. CASE REPORT: We describe a 36-years old Caucasian female with no known history of TB who presented with hip pain thought to be due to femoro-acetabular impingement (FAI). In the course of 18 months, the patient had been investigated extensively; including steroid injection, hip arthroscopy (including synovial biopsies), and eventually a total hip arthroplasty. During arthroplasty, further extensive biopsies were performed which raised the suspicion of TB on histology. Further synovial biopsies obtained arthroscopically were microbiologically positive for TB (PCR). The patient was sent to an infectious disease specialist. It appeared that the patient had TB in the past, of which she was unaware. CONCLUSION: We hypothesise that the immunosuppressant effects of the steroid injections she received reactivated her TB.

14.
J Bone Jt Infect ; 1: 59-64, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28529855

ABSTRACT

Background: Implant-related infections remain a major complication after orthopaedic surgery. Antibacterial coating of implants may prevent bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation. However, in spite of extensive preclinical research in the field, antibacterial coatings to protect orthopaedic implants in the clinical setting remain particularly few. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the safety of a calcium-based, antibiotic-loaded bone substitute as an antibacterial coating of cementless joint prosthesis. Methods: From March 2013 to August 2015, 20 consecutive patients scheduled for cementless or hybrid two-stage revision surgery for peri-prosthetic joint infection were included in this prospective, observational, pilot study. Cerament G or Cerament V, a gentamicin or vancomycin-loaded calcium-based resorbable bone substitute (60% calcium sulphate, 40% hydroxyapatite), was applied at surgery on the stem surface of hip (n=7) or knee (n=13) revision prosthesis. After surgery, all patients underwent clinical (HHS or KSS and SF-12 score), laboratory and radiographic evaluation at 3, 6 and 12 months and yearly thereafter. Results: At a minimum of 12 months follow-up, 19/20 (95%) patients showed no recurrence of infection and no signs of radiographic loosening of the stem. No adverse events were associated with the use of Cerament G or V. Conclusions: This is the first pilot clinical study on the short-term safety of using a calcium-based, gentamicin or vancomycin-loaded bone substitute as a surface coating on cementless prosthetic implants. If confirmed by larger studies and at longer follow-ups, these findings may open a new prospective to protect intra-operatively orthopedic implants from bacterial adhesion, through the use of resorbable, osteoconductive, antibiotic carriers.

15.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res ; 102(1): 127-9, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26611716

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Fungal infection of a total joint arthroplasty has a low incidence but is generally considered as more difficult to cure than bacterial infection. As for bacterial infection, two-stage exchange is considered as the gold standard of treatment. We report two cases of one-stage total joint exchange for fungal peri-prosthetic infection with Candida albicans, where the responsible pathogens was only identified on intraoperative samples. This situation can be considered as a one-stage exchange for fungal peri-prosthetic infection without preoperative identification of the responsible organism, which is considered as having a poor prognosis. Both cases were free of infection after two years. One-stage revision has several potential advantages over two-stage revision, including shorter hospital stay and rehabilitation, no interim period with significant functional impairment, shorter antibiotic treatment, better functional outcome and probably lower costs. We suggest that one-stage revision for C. albicans peri-prosthetic infection may be successful even without preoperative fungal identification. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-Historical cases.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods , Candidiasis/surgery , Hip Prosthesis/adverse effects , Prosthesis-Related Infections/surgery , Aged , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Candida albicans , Candidiasis/drug therapy , Female , Hip Prosthesis/microbiology , Humans , Middle Aged , Reoperation
16.
Bone Joint Res ; 4(11): 181-9, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26585304

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We wanted to investigate regional variations in the organisms reported to be causing peri-prosthetic infections and to report on prophylaxis regimens currently in use across England. METHODS: Analysis of data routinely collected by Public Health England's (PHE) national surgical site infection database on elective primary hip and knee arthroplasty procedures between April 2010 and March 2013 to investigate regional variations in causative organisms. A separate national survey of 145 hospital Trusts (groups of hospitals under local management) in England routinely performing primary hip and/or knee arthroplasty was carried out by standard email questionnaire. RESULTS: Analysis of 189 858 elective primary hip and knee arthroplasty procedures and 1116 surgical site infections found statistically significant variations for some causative organism between regions. There was a 100% response rate to the prophylaxis questionnaire that showed substantial variation between individual trust guidelines. A number of regimens currently in use are inconsistent with the best available evidence. CONCLUSIONS: The approach towards antibiotic prophylaxis in elective arthroplasty nationwide reveals substantial variation without clear justification. Only seven causative organisms are responsible for 89% of infections affecting primary hip and knee arthroplasty, which cannot justify such widespread variation between prophylactic antibiotic policies. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2015;4:181-189.

17.
Australas Med J ; 8(10): 307-14, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26576201

ABSTRACT

Systemic dissemination and peri-prosthetic infection of Mycobacterium bovis (M. bovis) following intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) therapy presents a rare but significant complication of treatment for non-muscle invasive bladder carcinoma. We present a patient with Mycobacterium bovis infection of a prosthetic hip nine months following BCG therapy for bladder cancer. The debridement and (implant) prosthesis retention approach in conjunction with anti-tuberculous medication (DAIR) employed in this case, allowed the same prosthesis to be retained. This case report highlights the importance of physician awareness of the possibility BCG peri-prosthetic infections.

18.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res ; 101(2): 151-6, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25676891

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Fungal peri-prosthetic joint infections (PJI) are rare complication following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). There exists no established guidelines in the treatment of these infections and controversies are focused on the usefulness of antifungal-loaded cement spacers, the duration of systemic antifungal treatment and the ideal interval between implant removal and reimplantation. Therefore we ask if: (1) adding antifungal in cement space is a viable solution to manage fungal PJI; (2) there is no adverse effect adding antifungal medication in cement? HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that fungal PJI following TKA could be managed successfully by 2-stage reimplantation strategy using antifungal-loaded cement spacer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five cases of fungal PJI following total knee arthroplasty were treated in our institution between 2007 and 2013 using a 2-stage reimplantation strategy. The median elapsed time from primary arthroplasty to the diagnosis of infection was 7.4 months (range, 5-10 months). The infection was caused by Candida species in 4 cases and Pichia anomala in 1 case. Antibiotic- and antifungal-loaded articulating cement spacer was implanted during the interval between stages. Systemic antifungal agents were administered for at least 6 weeks after removal of prosthesis in all cases. The mean interval between removal and reimplantation was 6 months (range, 3-9 months). RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 41.6 months (range, 24-65 months) after reimplantation, no patient had recurrent infection or revision due to any other reasons. The mean global IKS score improved from 58.4 (range, 37-96 points) preoperatively to 152.4 (range, 136-169 points) at final follow-up. The average range of motion of the knee for flexion improved from 63° (range, 10-110°) preoperatively to 98° (range, 80-120°) at final follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Fungal PJI following TKA can be successfully treated by a staged reimplantation strategy. Antibiotic- and antifungal-loaded cement spacer implanted during interval period between stages may be an effective adjunct to therapy. Effective antifungal therapy is crucial to a successful result without adverse effect. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV: retrospective or historical series.


Subject(s)
Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Mycoses/therapy , Prosthesis-Related Infections/therapy , Aged , Device Removal , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Replantation , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors
19.
Bone Joint J ; 96-B(6): 772-7, 2014 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24891577

ABSTRACT

The treatment of peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the ankle is not standardised. It is not clear whether an algorithm developed for hip and knee PJI can be used in the management of PJI of the ankle. We evaluated the outcome, at two or more years post-operatively, in 34 patients with PJI of the ankle, identified from a cohort of 511 patients who had undergone total ankle replacement. Their median age was 62.1 years (53.3 to 68.2), and 20 patients were women. Infection was exogenous in 28 (82.4%) and haematogenous in six (17.6%); 19 (55.9%) were acute infections and 15 (44.1%) chronic. Staphylococci were the cause of 24 infections (70.6%). Surgery with retention of one or both components was undertaken in 21 patients (61.8%), both components were replaced in ten (29.4%), and arthrodesis was undertaken in three (8.8%). An infection-free outcome with satisfactory function of the ankle was obtained in 23 patients (67.6%). The best rate of cure followed the exchange of both components (9/10, 90%). In the 21 patients in whom one or both components were retained, four had a relapse of the same infecting organism and three had an infection with another organism. Hence the rate of cure was 66.7% (14 of 21). In these 21 patients, we compared the treatment given to an algorithm developed for the treatment of PJI of the knee and hip. In 17 (80.9%) patients, treatment was not according to the algorithm. Most (11 of 17) had only one criterion against retention of one or both components. In all, ten of 11 patients with severe soft-tissue compromise as a single criterion had a relapse-free survival. We propose that the treatment concept for PJI of the ankle requires adaptation of the grading of quality of the soft tissues.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Ankle/adverse effects , Prosthesis-Related Infections/diagnosis , Prosthesis-Related Infections/surgery , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Ankle/methods , Cohort Studies , Drainage/methods , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Joint Instability/prevention & control , Joint Prosthesis , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Prosthesis-Related Infections/drug therapy , Reoperation/methods , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
20.
Bone Joint J ; 96-B(4): 492-6, 2014 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24692616

ABSTRACT

Fungal peri-prosthetic infections of the knee and hip are rare but likely to result in devastating complications. In this study we evaluated the results of their management using a single-stage exchange technique. Between 2001 and 2011, 14 patients (ten hips, four knees) were treated for a peri-prosthetic fungal infection. One patient was excluded because revision surgery was not possible owing to a large acetabular defect. One patient developed a further infection two months post-operatively and was excluded from the analysis. Two patients died of unrelated causes. After a mean of seven years (3 to 11) a total of ten patients were available for follow-up. One patient, undergoing revision replacement of the hip, had a post-operative dislocation. Another patient, undergoing revision replacement of the knee, developed a wound infection and required revision 29 months post-operatively following a peri-prosthetic femoral fracture. The mean Harris hip score increased to 74 points (63 to 84; p < 0.02) in those undergoing revision replacement of the hip, and the mean Hospital for Special Surgery knee score increased to 75 points (70 to 80; p < 0.01) in those undergoing revision replacement of the knee. A single-stage revision following fungal peri-prosthetic infection is feasible, with an acceptable rate of a satisfactory outcome.


Subject(s)
Hip Prosthesis/adverse effects , Knee Prosthesis/adverse effects , Mycoses/surgery , Prosthesis-Related Infections/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Bacterial Infections/etiology , Bacterial Infections/surgery , Comorbidity , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mycoses/etiology , Prosthesis-Related Infections/etiology , Recurrence , Reoperation/methods , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL