Prostate volume: does it predict patient outcomes following prostate artery embolisation? A retrospective cohort study.

Prostate artery embolisation (PAE) is a minimally invasive procedure commonly performed to treat lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) is a validated patient questionnaire quantifying LUTS and is used for patient selection for PAE, but it is largely subjective. Prostate volume is an easily estimated objective parameter across multiple imaging modalities. No strict threshold of prostate volume is established as a selection criterion for PAE, but it is generally accepted that prostate volume should be over 40 to 50 mL.We looked at a sample of 65 cases performed at a large teaching hospital between 2017 and 2019 with a minimum of four years follow up. Embospheres between 100 to 500 microns were injected into the prostatic arteries bilaterally (if technically feasible). A 'bullet shape' model was used to estimate prostatic volume from initial CT. N = 13 had an estimated volume < 51 mL (range 31-50 mL). IPSS before and at 3 months post-procedure were collected.80% of patients indicated a beneficial response to PAE (IPSS improvement > 5). 23% of patients required further PAE procedure or surgery. No major complications were recorded. The mean change in IPSS under 51 mL compared to over 51 mL cohort was 10.2 versus 11 (standard deviation 7.5 versus 7.3) (p = 0.44, 2 tailed Student's T-test).There was no statistically significant difference in the IPSS improvement or outcome of small volume prostates under 51 mL compared to large volume. Our results suggest that prostate volume should not be used to exclude patients for PAE.

Does larger prostate size provide protection for cancer specific outcomes in localized prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Benign prostatic hyperplasia is common in the aging population and frequently comorbid with localized prostate cancer. Large prostate volume places significant challenges in robotic prostatectomy including reduced mobility and visualization. The goal of this study is to evaluate the effect of prostate volume as a continuous variable on cancer specific outcomes. METHODS: Three thousand four hundred and twenty five patients with localized prostate cancer at a single institution who underwent robotic prostatectomy were retrospectively reviewed. A number of preoperative, operative, and postoperative variables were collected to evaluate cancer specific outcomes including pathologic stage, tissue margins, and biochemical recurrence (BCR). Logistic regression models and univariate and multivariate analyses were implemented for pathologic stage T3 and BCR respectively. RESULTS: The median follow up time was 52 months (IQR 18-95). 37.4% of the patients had a final pathologic stage of T3 or higher, 21.2% experienced positive surgical margins, and 24.7% of patients experienced BCR. Prostate size was a significant predictor of all three outcomes of interest. Increasing prostate size was protective against both higher pathologic stage and positive surgical margins (odds ratio = 0.989, 0.990 respectively, p < 0.001). There was a modest increase in the risk of BCR with increasing gland size (hazard ratio = 1.006, p < 0.001). These results were most significant for patients with Gleason Grade Groups 1 and 2 prostate cancer. CONCLUSION: Prostate size is a commonly determined clinical factor that effects both surgical planning and cancer specific outcomes. Increasing prostate size may offer protection against higher stage disease and positive surgical margins. While surgically challenging, favorable oncologic outcomes can be consistently achieved for patients with low-intermediate risk disease.

Prostate size ≥ 100 g and its association with long-term outcomes of Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether perioperative and functional outcomes of Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RS-RARP) may be affected by large prostate sizes (PS). METHODS: All patients treated with RS-RARP were identified and compared according to PS. The definition of PS relied on the prostatic weight at final pathology (PS < 100 g vs ≥ 100 g). Multivariable logistic regression models tested immediate and 12-month urinary continence recovery (UCR, namely, 0-1 safety pad per-day), and positive surgical margins (PSM). Multivariable Poisson log-linear regression analyses tested operative time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBL), and length of stay (LOS). The analyses relied on the database of a high-volume European institution (2010-2022). RESULTS: Of 1,555 overall patients, 1503 (96.7%) had a PS < 100 g and 52 (3.3%) had a PS ≥ 100 g. No differences were recorded in LOS (3 days), and intraoperative (1.9 vs 2.3%) as well as postoperative complications (13 vs 12%; all p values > 0.05). No significant difference was recorded in PSM (25 vs 23%, p = 0.6). In patients with PS ≥ 100 g vs < 100 g, immediate UCR rate was 42 vs 64% (p = 0.002), and 12-month UCR rate was 87 vs 88% (p = 0.3). PV ≥ 100 g independently predicted worse immediate UCR (odds ratio 0.55, 95% CI 0.30-0.98, p = 0.044), but not worse 12-month UCR (p = 0.3) or higher PSM (p = 0.7). PV ≥ 100 g independently predicted longer OT (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.12, 95% CI 1.10-1.15, p < 0.001) and higher EBL (IRR 1.26, 95% CI 1.24-1.28, p < 0.001), but not longer LOS (p = 0.3). CONCLUSIONS: RS-RARP is a valid option for prostate cancer treatment, even in case of very large prostates. Specifically, no significant association was recognized between PS ≥ 100 g and PSM or 12-month UCR.

Transurethral bipolar enucleation using a TUEB loop for large benign prostatic hyperplasia: a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of transurethral enucleation with bipolar system (TUEB) regardless of the prostate size using a specially developed TUEB loop. METHODS: A total of 251 patients who underwent TUEB were categorized into two groups depending on the prostate volume (PV): small-PV (≤ 80 mL) group, 133 patients; large-PV (> 80 mL) group, 118 patients. Comparisons of background information and treatment outcomes were performed between the groups. RESULTS: Operation (113.5 vs 166.4 min), enucleation (49.4 vs 68.1 min), and morcellation (11.4 vs 26.4 min) times were longer and hemoglobin decreased significantly (0.84 vs 1.30 g/dL) in the large PV group. However, the enucleation efficiency (enucleated weight per enucleation time; 0.71 vs 0.97 g/min) and prostate-specific antigen reduction rate (24.6% vs 16.1%) were significantly better in the large-PV group, with similar enucleation rates (enucleated weight per transitional zone volume; 82% vs 81%). The International Prostate Symptom Score, uroflowmetry maximum flow rate, and post-void residual urine in both groups improved at 3, 6, and 12 months compared with baseline. No patient underwent blood transfusion. There were no differences in the frequency of postoperative clot retention, urethral stricture, or stress incontinence at 3, 6, and 12 months. CONCLUSION: TUEB using a TUEB loop resulted in high levels of satisfaction regarding the enucleation efficiency, efficacy, and safety for BPH surgery regardless of the prostate size. TUEB should be considered one of the best treatment options for large BPH that is uncontrollable with medication.

A Unique Case of Prostate Carcinoma Presenting as Retroperitoneal Lymphadenopathy With Normal Levels of Prostate-Specific Antigen and a Prostate of Normal Size: A Case Report.

Despite the significant advancements in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening and the diverse array of available treatments, prostate cancer (PCa) still significantly contributes to cancer-related illness. The most prevalent sites for metastases are bones, distant lymph nodes, and abdominal organs. Nevertheless, metastasis to the renal and retroperitoneal regions originating from prostate cancer constitutes an exceptionally uncommon clinical occurrence. Metastatic PCa commonly presents with elevated serum PSA levels, a hallmark of its diagnostic profile. However, there are instances where patients exhibit atypical metastatic patterns or maintain normal PSA levels. In the case under consideration, the patient exhibited a periureteral tumor with an indeterminate primary origin, subsequently confirmed to be metastatic prostate cancer. This case underscores the importance of recognizing the varied and sometimes elusive presentations of metastatic PCa. Despite its rarity, the occurrence of renal and retroperitoneal metastasis emphasizes the need for vigilance and a comprehensive understanding of the diverse manifestations of advanced PCa for timely and accurate diagnosis, which is paramount in optimizing patient care and outcomes.

Impact of Prostate Size on the Functional and Oncological Outcomes of Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is the main surgical approach for treatment of prostate cancer in the USA. Prostate size is always depicted as a factor affecting the outcomes of RARP as shown by many studies, but these studies are limited to a small number of patients. Our aim was to evaluate functional and oncologic outcomes of RARP across varying prostate size measured as prostate specimen weight. METHODS: A cohort of 14 481 patients who underwent RARP in a single center was divided into four groups according to prostate specimen weight: group 1, <50 g; group 2, 50-100 g; group 3, 100-150 g; and group 4, >150 g. Perioperative and postoperative variables and pathological and functional outcomes were compared among the four groups. Cumulative incidence functions were plotted to visualize the distribution of event-time variables among the groups, and differences were evaluated using the log-rank test. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: Patients with larger prostates (groups 3 and 4) were more likely to have higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA), lower biopsy grade group, and worse baseline urinary and sexual characteristics. Group 4 had lower rates of full nerve-sparing surgery (13.7% vs 38.3%) and lymph node dissection (51.3% vs 71.4%), more pT2 disease (69.8% vs 60.3%), less pT3 disease (30.2% vs 39.7%), and lower rates of positive surgical margins (12.8% vs 19.3%) and biochemical recurrence (5.9% vs 7.5%) than group 1. Finally, we observed differences in functional outcomes among the groups for greater prostate size, and patients in group 4 had worse rates of urinary continence (77.8% vs 89.5%) and recovery of sexual function (70.0% vs 84.1%) than group 1. Our study is limited by its retrospective design. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The results demonstrate that in this large cohort of patients, greater prostate size affects multiple outcomes, including the rate of nerve-sparing surgery, potency and continence recovery, and oncological and pathological outcomes. These data will be valuable when counseling patients regarding possible RARP outcomes and the timeline for recovery. PATIENT SUMMARY: Our study shows that prostate size can affect the outcomes of robot-assisted removal of the prostate for patients with prostate cancer. Larger prostate size can be associated with worse functional outcomes after surgery.

The Impact of Prostate Volume in Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Single Centre Experience.

BACKGROUND: Even the most experienced surgeons experience technical difficulties and challenges when operating on very large prostates, regardless of surgical technique. Our goal was to determine whether preoperative prostate volume has an impact on functional and oncological outcomes after open radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of 909 patients who underwent open radical prostatectomy by a single surgeon at our institution. Variables were compared across quartile distributions of prostate volume as defined by preoperative transrectal ultrasound examination, including group A with prostate volume < 30ccm 3, group B with prostate volume ≥ 30ccm 3 and < 50ccm 3, group C with prostate volume ≥ 50ccm 3 and < 70ccm 3 and group D with prostate volume ≥ 70ccm3. Factors assessed in this analysis were patient age, preoperative prostate specific antigen (p-PSA), Gleason score, pathological stage, margin status, operative time, cystography leakage, early continence, biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free, and overall-survival (OS). The complication rates were classified using Clavien Dindo classification. RESULTS: There were no statistically relevant differences between the groups considering preoperative factors such as age, p-PSA, Gleason score, and tumor stadium. Patients with a very large prostate had slightly higher percentage of anastomosis leakage, severe Clavien Dindo complication rates (≥ 3), longer operation time and severe early incontinence (IV°) rates, simultaneously having lower positive margin rates. Nevertheless, the early continence rates, BCR-free and OS were similar regardless of the prostate size. CONCLUSIONS: open radical prostatectomy for patients with very large prostate is a viable therapy option with slightly higher urinary leakage-, early incontinence- and complication-rates that takes slightly more operation time. However, the functional and oncological outcomes are similar when compared to smaller prostates.

Indications for additional volume studies for gland volume estimation in prostate cancer brachytherapy.

An estimated gland volume of > 60 cc is a relative contraindication to brachytherapy for prostate cancer. As volume estimation using biopsy ultrasound (Bx-US) alone may be inaccurate, many centers perform additional volume assessments prior to the brachytherapy procedure. At the study institution, computed tomography (CT) based volume assessments were routinely performed on all patients to determine brachytherapy eligibility. This study aimed to determine whether this CT imaging could be omitted for certain Bx-US based gland volume estimates. To investigate this, 1576 consecutive patients that received ultrasound based intraoperatively planned brachytherapy at a single comprehensive cancer center between 2003 and 2021 were reviewed. Gland volume as estimated by Bx-US, CT and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging were compared to intraoperatively contoured gland volume (ICGV) or the larger contoured gland volume on CT for any patients receiving neo-adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for gland downsizing (IM-US-corr). There was a significant difference between IM-US-corr and estimated gland volume for Bx-US (P < 0.001) and MR (P < 0.001), but not CT (P = 0.160). Bx-US and MR tended to underrepresent the IM-US-corr, with a > 20% difference from actual volume in 31% and 59% of cases, respectively. When Bx-US volume was estimated to be < 40 cc, < 50 cc and < 60 cc, an IM-US-corr > 60 cc was encountered in 2%, 5% and 7% of cases, respectively. In contrast, IM-US-corr > 60 cc was encountered in 0.2%, 1% and 2% of cases for CT estimates of < 40 cc, < 50 cc and < 60 cc. In patients with an estimated gland volume of < 50 cc by Bx-US, dedicated pre-operative volume studies are unlikely to alter management. However, patients above this cut-off stand to benefit from the use of additional volume assessment to better delineate gland volume and determine eligibility for brachytherapy.

Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: A truly size-independent method?

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of prostate size on functional outcomes and perioperative morbidity, we analyzed patients undergoing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). As LUTS secondary to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) are a chronic progressive disease, prevalence and prostate size increase with age. HoLEP is a size-independent method for surgical treatment of LUTS/BPO and can be offered in medication-refractory patients with durable long-term results and reduced perioperative morbidity. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data of 852 patients who underwent HoLEP for LUTS secondary to BPO between 2014-2018. Patients were divided into group 1 (≤60 cc), group 2 (>60 < 120 cc), group 3 (≥120 cc). Perioperative parameters, safety and short-term functional outcomes were assessed and analyzed. RESULTS: Patients in group 3 were significantly older and showed a significantly higher median prostate-specific antigen level. Perioperative parameters, such as enucleation time and morcellation time significantly differed in favor of smaller prostate sizes, while enucleation and morcellation speed showed favorable results for larger prostate sizes. Larger prostates ≥120 cc showed a significantly higher postoperative drop in hemoglobin. However, patients did not differ in postoperative functional outcomes or Clavien-Dindo grade ≥II complications (4.8% of all patients [41/852]). There was no difference in perioperative complications between all groups (P = 0.760). CONCLUSION: While larger prostates take significantly longer to operate on, postoperative functional outcomes show no difference between all sizes. In conclusion, HoLEP is a size-independent and effective method for surgical treatment of LUTS/BPO in prostates ≥30 cc.

Impact of Prostate Size on the Outcomes of Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The impact of prostate size on the radical prostatectomy outcome is not clear. Several published reports have shown conflicting results. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of prostate size on the surgical, functional and oncological results of radical prostatectomy. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out in accordance with the PRISMA criteria. Finally, we investigated the research that reported on the impact of prostate size on radical prostatectomy outcome. The Review Manager (RevMan) software version 5.4 was utilized for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Eighteen studies including 12,242 patients were included. Estimated blood loss was significantly less with smaller prostates (Z = 3.01; p = 0.003). The complications rate was 17% with larger prostates, compared to 10% for smaller prostates (Z = 5.73; p < 0.00001). Seventy-three percent of patients with a smaller prostate were continent within one month, compared to 64% with a larger prostate (Z = 1.59; p = 0.11). The rate of positive surgical margins was significantly higher with smaller prostates (20.2% vs. 17.8%). (Z = 2.52; p = 0.01). The incidence of biochemical recurrence was higher with smaller prostates (7.8% vs. 4.9%) (Z = 1.87; p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: Larger prostate size is associated with more blood loss and a higher rate of complications. However, the oncological outcome is better, compared to that in patients with smaller prostates. The impact of the size on the functional outcome is not clear.

Any Correlation Between Prostate Volume and Incidence of Prostate Cancer: A Review of Reported Data for the Last Thirty Years.

PURPOSE: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common non-skin cancer in men worldwide and more than 80% of men with PCa also have histo-anatomical findings of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). It is well documented that BPH develops in the transition zone (TZ), whereas 80-85% of PCa originates in the peripheral zone (PZ) of the prostate. Possible causal links between both disease entities are controversially discussed in the current literature. Some studies have reported that larger prostates have a decreased incidence of PCa compared to smaller prostates. The purpose of this systematic review is to comprehensively summarize studies analyzing any association between prostate gland volume and incidence of PCa. METHODS: A thorough literature review was performed between 01.01.1990 through 02.28.2020 using PubMed and applying the "PRISMA" guidelines. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were defined. RESULTS: Our systematic review found 41 articles reporting an inverse (negative) relationship between prostate gland volume and incidence of prostate cancer. Sample sizes ranged from 114 to 6692 patients in these single institutional and multi-institutional studies. Thirty-nine (95%) of the 41 articles showed a statistically significant inverse relationship. In our search, no study was found showing a positive correlation between BPH size and the incidence of PCa. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review on the important clinical question of interaction between prostate size and the incidence of PCa. The results are demonstrating an inverse relationship, and therefore reveal strong evidence that large prostates may be protective of PCa when compared to smaller prostates.

A retrospective review of canine benign prostatic hyperplasia with and without prostatitis.

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is the most common prostatic disorder in older intact male dogs, but despite its prevalence, there are inconsistencies in clinical diagnosis and treatment. Although prostate size was historically considered the hallmark feature of BPH in men, currently, there is only a weak correlation between prostate size and clinical severity. We performed a retrospective cohort study with the primary objective of assessing clinical signs, ultrasonographic findings, treatments, and outcomes in dogs diagnosed with BPH, with and without concurrent prostatitis. We reviewed medical records and obtained data on presenting signs, prostatic imaging, and prevalence of concurrent bacteriuria. Prostate size was determined by ultrasonography and compared to the calculated expected size based on patient age and weight. Treatment and outcome were described for the cases with a minimum 2 months follow-up. Median age of dogs diagnosed with BPH was 8 years. Clinical signs were present in 16/25 dogs and scored as mild to moderate (median Zambelli's Symptom Index for BPH score 12). The median prostatic volume to body mass ratio was 1.60 mm3/kg. Prostate size did not correlate with the symptom severity. Concurrent bacteriuria was confirmed in 4/25 cases via bacterial culture and/or cytology. Treatments pursued and responses were only available in a subpopulation of dogs (n = 9) and were highly variable. Studies are needed to determine if current treatment options for BPH in dogs resolve associated clinical signs in addition to reducing prostate size.

The relationship between glucose homeostasis status and prostate size in aging Chinese males with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

PURPOSE: Increasing evidence shows that many metabolic factors are involved in the progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). We aimed to assess the relationship between the status of glucose homeostasis and prostate size in aging Chinese males undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for BPH. METHODS: A total of 1006 medical records of BPH patients undergoing TURP were reviewed. Prostate size was measured by transrectal ultrasound. Annual total prostate (TP) and transitional zone (TZ) growth rates were calculated. According to the American Diabetes Association criteria, the patients were categorized as normoglycemic, prediabetic, or diabetic. Levels of glucose homeostasis and other variables were considered independent variables in an effort to evaluate any potential correlations using non-adjusted and multivariate-adjusted regression models. RESULTS: A total of 659 individuals were included in the study. BPH patients < 70 years old and ≥ 70 years old in the normoglycemic group had a stable prostate growth rate. The change in prostate size in those younger than 70 years, however, was faster in the prediabetic and diabetic group. Further analysis revealed that abnormal glucose homeostasis was positively correlated with prostate size. In those younger than 70 years, compared with the normal glucose group, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) for TP and TZ enlargement in the prediabetic group was 2.27 (95%CI 1.29-4.00) and 3.19 (95%CI 1.78-5.72), respectively, and the adjusted ORs were 4.74 (95%CI 2.18-10.30) and 6.16 (95%CI 2.70-14.06), respectively, for men with diabetes. However there was no significant difference among men aged ≥ 70 years. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing TURP, the prostate volume and growth rate were affected by different status of glucose homeostasis. Hyperglycemia may play an important role in prostate growth.

Prostate Cancer in a Patient with Giant Prostatic Hyperplasia: The Robotic Approach to a Difficult Problem.

The robotic approach toward radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer has only recently become widespread. Two of the advantages of the robotic approach have been described to be the optical magnification afforded by camera and the ability to reach deep into the pelvis. These advantages are particularly salient in cases where the pelvis is particularly narrow or the prostate is particularly large. In this report, we describe the management of a patient with two simultaneous prostatic diseases: prostate cancer and a massive prostate weighing 560 g causing urinary retention and hematuria, who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate removal. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest prostate to be removed through the means of robot-assisted surgery.

Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: patient selection and perspectives.

BACKGROUND: Multiple endoscopic surgical options exist to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), including holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). HoLEP alleviates obstructive prostatic tissue via enucleation, both bluntly with a resectoscope and by cutting tissue with the holmium laser, and removal of adenoma via morcellation. This article reviews patient selection for HoLEP in order to optimize outcomes, costs, and patient satisfaction. METHODS: A literature review of all studies on HoLEP was conducted. Studies that focused on outcomes in regard to patient and procedural factors were closely reviewed and discussed. RESULTS: Various studies found that men with large or small prostates, on antithrombotic therapy, in urinary retention, with bladder hypocontractility, with prostate cancer, undergoing retreatment for BPH, or in need of concomitant surgery for bladder stones and other pathologies do well with HoLEP, as demonstrated by excellent functional and symptomatic outcomes as well as low complication rates. There is a 74-78% rate of retrograde ejaculation following HoLEP. Techniques to preserve ejaculatory function following enucleative techniques have not been able to demonstrate a significant improvement. CONCLUSION: Patient selection for HoLEP can include most men with bothersome BPH who have evidence of bladder outlet obstruction and are healthy enough to undergo surgery. The ability to safely perform concomitant surgery with HoLEP benefits the patient by sparing them an additional anesthetic and also decreases costs. Patients should be made aware of the risk of retrograde ejaculation following HoLEP and counseled on treatment alternatives if maintaining ejaculatory function is desired.

Impact of a preoperatively estimated prostate volume using transrectal ultrasonography on surgical and oncological outcomes in a single surgeon's experience with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND: To assess the impact of preoperatively estimated prostate volume (PV) using transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) on surgical and oncological outcomes in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). METHODS: We analyzed the experience of a single surgeon at our hospital who performed 436 RARPs without neoadjuvant hormone therapy between August 2006 and December 2013. Patients were divided into three groups according to their preoperative PV calculated using TRUS (PV ≤ 20 cm(3): group 1, n = 61; 20 < PV < 50 cm(3): group 2, n = 303; PV ≥ 50 cm(3): group 3, n = 72). RESULTS: Blood loss was significantly higher in group 3 than in group 1 and group 2. In stage pT2 patients, the rate of positive surgical margin (PSM) was significantly lower in group 3 than in group 1. In addition, perioperative complications significantly increased with increasing PV, while the extraprostatic extension (EPE) rate significantly decreased with increasing PV. The preoperative biopsy Gleason score, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density, and clinical T2 stage were inversely correlated with increasing PV. Biochemical recurrence-free survival after RARP was significantly lower in group 1 than in groups 2 and 3. CONCLUSIONS: A large prostate size was significantly associated with increased blood loss and a higher rate of perioperative complications. A small prostate size was associated with a higher PSM rate, PSA density, Gleason score, EPE rate, and biochemical recurrence rate. These results suggest that RARP was technically challenging in patients with large prostates, whereas small prostates were associated with unfavorable oncological outcomes.

Prostate-Specific Antigen testing in men between 40 and 70 years in Brazil: database from a check-up program

Objectives To evaluate the PSA in a large population of Brazilian men undergone to check up, and correlate the PSA cutoffs with prostate size and urinary symptoms. Materials and Methods This is a cross sectional study performed with men between 40 and 70 years undergone to check-up. All men were undergone to urological evaluation, digital rectal examination, prostate-specific antigen, and ultrasonography The exclusion criteria were men who used testosterone in the last six months, or who were using 5 alpha-reductase inhibitors. Results A total of 5015 men with an average age of 49.0 years completed the study. Most men were white and asymptomatic. The PSA in the three different aging groups were 0.9 ± 0.7ng/dL for men between 40 and 50; 1.2 ± 0.5ng/dL for men between 50 and 60; and 1.7 ± 1.5ng/dL for men greater than 60 years (p=0.001). A total of 192 men had PSA between 2.5 and 4ng/ml. From these men 130 were undergone to prostate biopsy. The predictive positive value of biopsy was 25% (32/130). In the same way, 100 patients had PSA >4ng/mL. From these men, 80 were undergone to prostate biopsy. In this group, the predictive positive value of biopsy was 40% (32/100). The Gleason score was 6 in 19 men (60%), 7 in 10 men (31%) and 8 in 3 men (9%). Conclusions The PSA level of Brazilian men undergone to check up was low. There was a positive correlation with aging, IPSS and prostate size. .