Surgical Specialty Outcome Differences for Major Spinal Procedures in Low-Acuity Patients.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Cohort Study. OBJECTIVES: There is an ongoing debate as to the influence of specialty training on spine surgery. Alomari et al. indicated the influence of specialty on ACDF procedures. However, deeper analysis into other spine procedures and lower-acuity procedures has yet to occur. In this study, we aim to determine if the outcomes of the low American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification (ASA 1&2) patients undergoing spine surgery vary based on whether the operating surgeon was an orthopedic surgeon or a neurosurgeon. METHODS: The NSQIP databases from 2015 to 2021 were queried based on the CPT code for nine common spine procedures. Indicators of surgical course and successful outcomes were documented and compared between specialties. RESULTS: Neurosurgeons had minimally shorter operative times in the ASA 1&2 combined classification (ASA-C) group for cervical, lumbar, and combined spinal procedural groups. Neurosurgeons had a slightly lower percentage of perioperative transfusions in select ASA-C classes. Orthopedic surgeons had shorter lengths of stay for the cervical groups in ASA-C and ASA-1 classes (ASA-1). However, many specialty differences found in spine patients become less pronounced when considering only ASA-1 patients. Finally, postoperative complication outcomes and re-admission were similar between orthopedic and neurological surgeons in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: These results, while statistically significant, are very likely clinically insignificant. They demonstrate that both orthopedic surgeons and neurosurgeons perform spinal surgery exceedingly safely with similarly low complication rates. This lays the groundwork for future exploration and benchmarking of performance in spine surgeries across neurosurgery and orthopedics.

Increasing Caudal Block Utilization to Promote Opioid Stewardship in the NICU Population: A Quality Improvement Project.

BACKGROUND: Regional anesthetic techniques are safe and effective in reducing pain and the need for opioid analgesia but may be underutilized in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) patients. We developed an opioid stewardship pathway aimed at reducing the use of opioid analgesia in neonates by increasing caudal block utilization from a baseline of 50%-90% within 18 months. METHODS: We used control charts to track intra-operative opioid utilization in morphine milligram equivalents per kilogram (MME/kg) and immediate post-operative extubation rates. Unrelieved pain (defined as two consecutive Neonatal Pain, Agitation & Sedation Scale (NPASS) scores >/ = 4), post-operative opioid use, and reintubation within 24 h were tracked as balancing measures. We ran sample statistical analysis comparing the outcome and balancing measures in surgeries with and without caudal block. RESULTS: There were 125 surgeries in the pre-intervention and 48 in the post-intervention group. Caudal block utilization increased to 63%, while intra-operative opioid utilization decreased (0.230 vs 0.416 MME/kg), and extubation rates increased (75% vs 70%). There were no increases in unrelieved pain or post-operative opioid utilization. Caudal block was associated with decreased intra-operative opioid use (0.000 vs 0.366 MME/kg, p < 0.001) and increased extubation rates (83% vs. 59%, p < 0.001) with no increase in unrelieved pain (23% vs. 22%, p = 0.75) or post-operative opioid use (0.151 vs 0.000 MME/kg, p = 0.35). No patients required reintubation within 24 h. CONCLUSION: The modest increase in caudal block utilization is associated with a reduction in intraoperative opioid use and increased postoperative extubation rates without compromising pain control. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Reduction of Pediatric Gastrostomy Tube Healthcare Utilization and Socioeconomic Disparities: Longitudinal Benefits of Quality Improvement.

BACKGROUND: Disparities in emergency department (ED) utilization after gastrostomy (G-) tube placement were previously demonstrated at our children's hospital. We aimed to reduce postoperative G-tube dislodgements and ED visits with a particular focus on socially vulnerable children. METHODS: Our improvement team implemented a G-tube care bundle (6/2018-9/2019) targeting caregiver preparedness and standardizing care in the pre-, intra-, and post-operative periods. Patients who had G tubes placed between 1/2011-8/2022 were categorized to either pre- or post-intervention groups. Primary outcomes were tracked prospectively. National area deprivation index (ADI) was assigned retrospectively and employed to evaluate social risk. Univariate comparisons were made between pre- and post-intervention groups, and between High ADI (≥80) and Low ADI (<80) subgroups in both pre- and post- intervention periods. We used statistical process control methods to further analyze change over time. RESULTS: 396 children were included (188 pre-intervention, 208 post-intervention). The post-intervention cohort demonstrated a lower rate of outpatient dislodgement at 90 days following G-tube placement (21.3 % vs 10.1 %, p = 0.002) and fewer G-tube-related ED visits per G-tube placed within one year of placement (mean 0.8 visits vs 0.6 visits, p = 0.012). Pre-intervention, children from high ADI neighborhoods had significantly greater healthcare utilization compared to those from lower ADI neighborhoods. Post-intervention, previously statistically significant disparities were no longer present. Outpatient G-tube dislodgements within 90 days were particularly mitigated. CONCLUSIONS: A longstanding quality improvement initiative has led to sustained reductions in overall G-tube-related health care utilization. Care standardization and improvement may mitigate outcome disparities related to socioeconomic advantage. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective Comparative Study and Prospective Quality Improvement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Quality evaluation of French guidelines in primary care infectious disease: An AGREE II assessment.

RATIONALE: Antibiotic prescription, its nature and its duration are a very common decision-making situation in primary care practice. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are regularly emitted by various organisations on this topic. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Our goal is to run a quality appraisal of the current French guidelines, for the most common primary care infectious pathologies. METHOD: We collected all primary care CPGs that are currently prevailing in France through a systematic review of the french website Antibioclic®. For each of these guidelines, a quality assessment was run by 3 independent reviewers, by means of the Appraisal of Guidelines for REsearch & Evaluation II instrument. The main outcome was a 'reliability score', defined as the sum of the scores in domains 'rigour of development' and 'editorial independence'. To be considered 'reliable', the CPG had to reach a 60% threshold in these two domains. Secondary outcomes were as follows: global quality score of CPGs, number and ratio of CPGs for which a systematic review has been conducted during its conception. RESULTS: Over the 43 CPGs that have been assessed, none reached the 60%-threshold as to the reliability score. Only one CPG (2.33%) gets an over-60% quality assessment in the domain of rigour of development (D3), whereas three CPGs (6.98%) reach this threshold in the domain of editorial independence (D6). One CPG (2.33%) met the quality threshold of 60% as to overall assessment. Rigour of development and editorial independence are the domains that obtained the lowest average score, respectively, 11% and 21%. Overall assessment received an average score of 29%. A systematic review of the literature was mentioned for 10 CPGs (23.26%). CONCLUSION: There is a lack of quality in the development process of the current French guidelines in primary care infectiology. This process should be reconsidered, with higher insistence as to its quality.

Veteran comfort and satisfaction with comprehensive geriatric assessment via video telehealth to home.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this project was to measure satisfaction with virtual comprehensive geriatric assessments (CGA) among older Veterans (OVs). METHODS: The CGA involved five different healthcare providers and four one-hour VA Video Connect (VVC) calls. Using specific enrollment criteria, OVs were recruited in four cohorts separated by time. After completing the CGA, participants were asked to complete a 10-statement telephone questionnaire. Before analyses, responses to each statement were dichotomized as Agree (Agree/Strongly agree) or Do not Agree (Neutral/Disagree/Strongly Disagree). Descriptive statistics and Binomial generalized linear models (GLMs) were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: All 269 enrolled OVs completed all components of the CGA. This included 79, 57, 61, and 72 Veterans in cohorts 1 to 4, respectively. Their average age was 76.0 ± 5.9 years, and they were predominately white (82%), male (94%), and residents of rural settings (64%). Of the 236 (88%) OVs who completed the telephone survey, 57% indicated they were comfortable using VVC and 57% expressed willingness to use VVC again; 44% felt that VVC was easier than going to in-person visits. The OVs in Cohort 1 were more likely to agree with these statements than those in the remaining cohorts, especially Cohorts 2 and 4. Differences in demographics partially explained some of these findings. The majority (89% or higher) of survey participants agreed with the remaining seven survey statements indicating they were satisfied with the CGA program. CONCLUSION: OVs were very satisfied with their participation in a program of CGA, although not necessarily the mode of delivery. The percentage of participants who indicated discomfort using VVC for the CGA visits appeared to increase with time. Further work is needed to determine which OVs would be the best candidates to use VVC to complete all or part of a CGA.

A Quality Improvement Approach to Increasing Access to long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives in a Federally Qualified Health Center.

OBJECTIVES: Long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) are the most effective forms of contraception available and therefore play a critical role in supporting patients to exercise bodily autonomy and achieve reproductive goals. A comprehensive set of quality improvement (QI) interventions were implemented between March and June 2019 to improve LARC access at a federally qualified health center (FQHC) in (US State). METHODS: An evaluation study was conducted to assess the impact of the QI initiative considering the number of LARCS delivered as a proxy for access. The Wilcoxon-rank test was applied to test for significance, given a non-parametric sample of LARCs delivered by 13 providers (matched to themselves) pre- and post-intervention. Reimbursement for LARC procedures pre- and post-intervention was also examined to determine economic impact and sustainability of incorporating a new device, the Liletta™, in the floor stock. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant increase in LARC delivery between July 2019-March 2020 compared to July 2018-March 2019. Approximately $1,000 per month increased reimbursement for LARC services occurred post-intervention. The evaluation study concluded success of the QI intervention, with need for further study needed to determine equitable delivery of contraceptive services between different subpopulations and by insurance status. CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: The study provides a blueprint for QI initiatives to improve access to LARCs while also increasing revenue for LARC services in an FQHC setting.

A novel method of cardia visualization and comfort level enhancement during magnetic capsule gastroscopy via sugar-glued tether-assisted technique: a randomized pilot study inspired by a Chinese snack-making process (with video).

BACKGROUND: Magnetic capsule gastroscopy (MCG) is a non-invasive diagnostic method for the digestive tract. However, its efficiency in visualizing the gastric cardia is often compromised due to the capsule's rapid passage. This study introduces a novel sugar-glued tether-assisted technique inspired by a traditional Chinese snack-making process to enhance cardia visualization and patient comfort during MCG. METHODS: This pilot, open-label, single-center, randomized controlled, non-inferiority study was conducted at Binzhou Medical University Hospital. Seventy-eight patients were enrolled and divided into three groups: conventional MCG, suction cup tether-assisted MCG, and sugar-glued tether-assisted MCG. The primary outcomes included safety, comfort level, and gastric cardia visualization quality. Secondary outcomes assessed technique-associated performance and clinical factors. RESULTS: The sugar-glued tether-assisted MCG demonstrated comparable cardia visualization quality to the suction cup method, with significantly better results than conventional MCG. Comfort levels were significantly higher in the sugar-glued group compared to the suction cup group. The number of swallow attempts was significantly lower in the sugar-glued group, with no adverse events reported. Secondary outcomes showed no significant differences in MCG assembly time and ingestion-to-detachment period between the suction cup and sugar-glued groups. CONCLUSION: The sugar-glued tether-assisted MCG is a feasible and safe modification that enhances gastric cardia visualization while improving patient comfort. This technique provides a cost-effective alternative to the suction cup method, warranting further investigation in larger, multi-center studies.

A Multimodal Intervention to Improve Guideline-Based Screening for Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency in a Community Health Setting.

Rationale: Evidence-based guidelines recommend screening all individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) for the genetic disorder alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD). However, it is estimated that only 5% of people with COPD have been tested for AATD, and a large fraction of the estimated 70,000 to 100,000 Americans with AATD have not yet been diagnosed. Low familiarity with AATD and limited knowledge about diagnostic tests and available treatments contribute to suboptimal screening rates. Objectives: To address barriers to and improve rates of guideline-based AATD diagnostic testing among racially and ethnically diverse patients with COPD at a large community health center. Methods: A quality improvement initiative consisting of educational sessions and electronic health record (EHR) system interventions was implemented to improve the adoption of guideline-based screening for AATD in patients with COPD. Results: An analysis of EHR data demonstrated that of patients with a COPD diagnosis (N = 1,030), 22.2% (n = 229) were screened for AATD in the 12 months following the start of the quality improvement initiative compared with 1.3% (n = 13) of patients with a COPD diagnosis (N = 972) seen in the 12 months prior to the start of the quality improvement initiative (P < 0.001). Conclusions: A quality improvement initiative consisting of educational sessions and EHR system modifications was successful in increasing clinicians' knowledge and diagnostic screening rates for AATD in patients with COPD at a large community health center.

Do health care quality improvement policies work for all? Distributional effects by baseline quality in South Africa.

Health care quality improvement (QI) initiatives are being implemented by a number of low- and middle-income countries. However, there is concern that these policies may not reduce, or may even worsen, inequities in access to high-quality care. Few studies have examined the distributional impact of QI programmes. We study the Ideal Clinic Realization and Maintenance program implemented in health facilities in South Africa, assessing whether the effects of the program are sensitive to previous quality performance. Implementing difference-in-difference-in-difference and changes-in-changes approaches we estimate the effect of the program on quality across the distribution of past facility quality performance. We find that the largest gains are realized by facilities with higher baseline quality, meaning this policy may have led to a worsening of pre-existing inequity in health care quality. Our study highlights that the full consequences of QI programmes cannot be gauged solely from examination of the mean impact.

Effects of implementation strategies on nursing practice and patient outcomes: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Implementation strategies targeting individual healthcare professionals and teams, such as audit and feedback, educational meetings, opinion leaders, and reminders, have demonstrated potential in promoting evidence-based nursing practice. This systematic review examined the effects of the 19 Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization Care (EPOC) healthcare professional-level implementation strategies on nursing practice and patient outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted following the Cochrane Handbook, with six databases searched up to February 2023 for randomized studies and non-randomized controlled studies evaluating the effects of EPOC implementation strategies on nursing practice. Study selection and data extraction were performed in Covidence. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted in RevMan, while studies not eligible for meta-analysis were synthesized narratively based on the direction of effects. The quality of evidence was assessed using GRADE. RESULTS: Out of 21,571 unique records, 204 studies (152 randomized, 52 controlled, non-randomized) enrolling 36,544 nurses and 340,320 patients were included. Common strategies (> 10% of studies) were educational meetings, educational materials, guidelines, reminders, audit and feedback, tailored interventions, educational outreach, and opinion leaders. Implementation strategies as a whole improved clinical practice outcomes compared to no active intervention, despite high heterogeneity. Group and individual education, patient-mediated interventions, reminders, tailored interventions and opinion leaders had statistically significant effects on clinical practice outcomes. Individual education improved nurses' attitude, knowledge, perceived control, and skills, while group education also influenced perceived social norms. Although meta-analyses indicate a small, non-statistically significant effect of multifaceted versus single strategies on clinical practice, the narrative synthesis of non-meta-analyzed studies shows favorable outcomes in all studies comparing multifaceted versus single strategies. Group and individual education, as well as tailored interventions, had statistically significant effects on patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple types of implementation strategies may enhance evidence-based nursing practice, though effects vary due to strategy complexity, contextual factors, and variability in outcome measurement. Some evidence suggests that multifaceted strategies are more effective than single component strategies. Effects on patient outcomes are modest. Healthcare organizations and implementation practitioners may consider employing multifaceted, tailored strategies to address local barriers, expand the use of underutilized strategies, and assess the long-term impact of strategies on nursing practice and patient outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42019130446.

Mobilizing strategic inflection points for sustainment of an effective intervention in an integrated learning health system: an interpretive description.

BACKGROUND: Innovative models of care have the potential to improve the sustainability of health systems by improving patient and provider experiences and population outcomes while simultaneously reducing costs. Yet, it is challenging to recognize the distinctive points during research and quality improvement processes that contribute to sustainment of effective interventions. The business concept of an inflection point-the position on the curve of a trajectory where the progress in implementation of an intervention is accelerated or decelerated-may be useful to understand implementation and improve sustainability and ultimately sustainment of effective interventions. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively identify and describe strategic inflection points that accelerated the sustainability process and led to the sustainment of Alberta Family Integrated Care. METHODS: This qualitative study was conducted in Alberta, Canada and employed an interpretive description design. Purposively sampled documents (proposals, project management plans, reports to funders and sponsors, meeting minutes, and fidelity audit and feedback checklists) from the Alberta Family Integrated Care cluster randomized controlled trial and quality improvement project constituted data for this study. RESULTS: To accelerate sustainability in the research context, we identified (1) alignment with strategic priorities, (2) iterative, user-centered co-design, and (3) contextualization of implementation as strategic inflection points. To accelerate sustainability in the health system context, we identified (1) the learning health system, (2) enduring partnerships, (3) responsivity to societal and system change, (4) embedded governance, and (5) intentional integration into the health system as strategic inflection points. Capitalizing on these strategic inflection points led to sustainment of Alberta Family Integrated Care in the provincial health system. CONCLUSIONS: We identified key inflection points in the research and health system contexts that led to sustainment of Alberta Family Integrated Care. By anticipating, recognizing, and leveraging inflection points in the sustainability process, researchers may be able to accelerate implementation and achieve sustainment of multi-component interventions in complex systems. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02879799. Registration date: May 27, 2016. Protocol version: June 9, 2016; version 2. Protocol publication: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2181-3 .

Quieting the neonatal intensive care unit: A quality improvement initiative.

BACKGROUND: The neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is vital for preterm infants but is often plagued by harmful noise levels. Excessive noise, ranging from medical equipment to conversations, poses significant health risks, including hearing impairment and neurodevelopmental issues. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends strict sound limits to safeguard neonatal well-being. Strategies such as education, environmental modifications, and quiet hours have shown to reduce noise levels. However, up to 60% of the noises remain avoidable. High noise exposure exacerbates physiological disturbances, impacting vital functions and long-term neurological outcomes. Effective noise reduction in the NICU is crucial for promoting optimal neonatal development. AIM: To measure the sound levels in a NICU and reduce ambient sound levels by at least 10% from baseline. METHODS: A quasi-experimental quality improvement project was conducted over 4 mo in a 20-bed level 3 NICU in a tertiary care medical college. Baseline noise levels were recorded continuously using a sound level meter. The interventions included targeted education, environmental modifications, and organizational changes, and were implemented through three rapid Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles. Weekly feedback and monitoring were conducted, and statistical process control charts were used for analysis. The mean noise values were compared using the paired t-test. RESULTS: The baseline mean ambient noise level in the NICU was 67.8 dB, which decreased to 50.5 dB after the first cycle, and further decreased to 47.4 dB and 51.2 dB after subsequent cycles. The reduction in noise levels was 21% during the day and 28% at night, with an overall decrease of 25% from baseline. The most significant reduction occurred after the first PDSA cycle (mean difference of -17.3 dB, P < 0.01). Peak noise levels decreased from 110 dB to 88.24 dB after the intervention. CONCLUSION: A multifaceted intervention strategy reduced noise in the NICU by 25% over 4 months. The success of this initiative emphasizes the significance of comprehensive interventions for noise reduction.

Implementation of a novel daily performance improvement checklist (PIC) improves alcohol screening and intervention compliance in trauma.

Introduction: Screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) has demonstrated up to 50% reduction in alcohol-related traumatic injury and is mandated by the American College of Surgeons for trauma center accreditation. While SBIRT effectiveness has been previously investigated, optimal implementation in the trauma setting has not. We sought to improve SBIRT compliance through integration of screening into a performance improvement checklist (PIC) deployed during morning report. We hypothesized that PIC would establish a self-sustaining model for improved alcohol screening/intervention. Methods: This was a retrospective study comparing trauma patients pre-PIC (January-May 2022) to post-PIC (January-May 2023) after PIC implementation in January 2023. The primary outcome was SBIRT performance. The PIC prompted alcohol intervention specialist consultation if blood alcohol content >80 mg/dL, <21 years old, or Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test ≥8. Significance was determined if p<0.05. Results: There were 705 pre-PIC and 840 post-PIC patients. Pre-PIC unscreened patients were more often uninsured (13% vs. 25%, p<0.01) and black (8% vs. 14%, p=0.02) compared with screened pre-PIC patients. There were no significant differences among screened versus unscreened patients after PIC with respect to age, sex, race, or ethnicity (p>0.05). Overall, screening improved pre-PIC to post-PIC (52% vs. 88%, p<0.01) and the percentage of patients who screened positively also increased after PIC (8% vs. 23%, p<0.01). Brief intervention was unchanged (83% vs. 81%, p=1). Conclusion: The PIC is a novel tool that demonstrated improved alcohol screening and referral. It improved compliance with SBIRT and reduced implicit bias in the population screened. Utilization of a PIC is easily translatable to other centers and could become a national standard to advance performance improvement. Level of evidence: IV.

Significant reduction in full-thickness pressure injuries through the quality improvement project that implements alternating pressure air mattresses.

To assess a quality improvement project using alternating pressure air mattresses' impact on reducing full-thickness pressure injuries by enhancing setting accuracy and device utilization. We retrospectively evaluated adult acute care unit patients with inclusion criteria (Braden scores ≤12 or existing full-thickness pressure injuries) between May 2020 and August 2023. A wound team attempted to enhance the accuracy, utilization and effectiveness of alternating pressure air mattress implementation. The implementation outcomes were setting accuracy and accurate utilization rates. The clinical outcome was the full-thickness pressure injury proportion. Utilization and allocation gaps were also calculated. The setting accuracy and accurate utilization rates increased (0.59 to 0.88 and 0.15 to 0.37, respectively). The full-thickness pressure injury proportion decreased (0.17 to 0.06), with a strong negative correlation coefficient (-0.789) (p < 0.001) with accurate utilization rates. The full-thickness pressure injury proportion declined faster during the project's complete phase than the partial phase (-0.0046 vs. -0.0016; p < 0.05). The utilization gap narrowed (99 to 60); however, the allocation gap increased (1 to 13), suggesting increased alternating pressure air mattress usage among ineligible patients. Targeting high-risk patients for alternating pressure air mattress utilization and ensuring correct settings, both performed by a dedicated team, substantially reduces the full-thickness pressure injury incidence.

Can a digital tool improve the understanding of treatment option for patients with head/neck cancer and increase providers' self-perceived ability to communicate with patients?: Shortened Running Title: Digital tool for head/neck cancer treatment understanding.

PURPOSE: A digital visual communication tool was recently developed by MyCareGorithm which incorporates explanations of treatments and procedures for cancer patients. This study will evaluate if this novel tool can enhance both patient and provider satisfaction. METHODS: In an IRB approved, prospective, pilot study, patients and caregivers at a single institution receiving head and neck cancer radiation underwent an initial consult using this digital tool and completed a survey of 6 questions to evaluate their understanding of their disease. Providers completed a 7-question survey to rate their satisfaction. Patients and caregivers with 4 or more "Yes" answers and providers with 5 or more "Yes" answers were defined as "Satisfied". In order to obtain 90% power to detect that the proportion of "Satisfied" patients (assumed 75%) is greater than 50% with a significance level 5% using a one-sided Z test, we planned to enroll 30 patients. RESULTS: Thirty patients enrolled and completed all surveys. Most patients were male (66%), white (60%) and spoke English as a primary language (93%). Patients most commonly had oropharyngeal cancer (23%). Overall, 27 out of 30 of patients (90%; one sided 95%CI: 76.1%) were satisfied (z = 4.38, p < 0.05), 16 of the 17 caregivers (94%; one sided 95% CI: 74.8%) were satisfied and 100% of providers were satisfied with the digital tool. Most patients (90%) and caregivers (94%) felt that the tool improved their understanding of the disease. One male answered "No" for all 6 questions commenting that it was only marginally helpful. One female also answered "No" for all questions commenting that she did not find it helpful on its own without the provider explanation. Out of the 30 patients, 26 (87%) stayed at our institution to receive treatment. CONCLUSIONS: These findings showed high rates of patient, caregiver and provider satisfaction with their initial consult when incorporating a digital visual tool. Its routine use in clinical practice should be strongly considered.

Assessment of preparedness for emergency cesarean section by utilizing a checklist before and after an educational intervention: A quality improvement study.

Using cognitive aids, like checklists, for clinical practices will significantly improve the quality of patient care and thereby reduce morbidities and mortalities. We used one such checklist to assess preparedness for emergency cesarean sections. Sixty-five emergency cesarean sections were assessed in the baseline period without informing the residents and other operating room staff. We then conducted educational intervention sessions for residents of obstetrics and anesthesiology and for nursing officers on the significance of each step in the checklist, focusing on the steps that were often missed. The checklist had 22 actions. The mean percentage of each checklist action in all 65 assessments was computed. The average of these values was the overall percentage of completed actions in 65 assessments, which was 78.80%. In the post-intervention period, this increased to 92.48%. The results of our study indicate that residents understood the importance of each checklist action and it reflects their positive attitude towards improving patient care. Although we did not measure our intervention in terms of patient outcomes, our assessment has helped us identify lacunae in our hospital practice.

A Collaborative Quality Improvement Project to Reduce Surgical Site Infection in Cesarean Delivery.

Introduction: Cesarean delivery (CD) facilitates delivery of the baby through an incision and is performed in situations where vaginal delivery poses risks to the mother, baby, or both. Over 1.2 million CDs are performed in the United States annually. Methods: An interdisciplinary council was created to drive regular data analysis and sharing, interdisciplinary collaboration, and standardized processes to reduce surgical site infections (SSI) following CD. The standardized infection ratio (SIR), a summary measure used to track hospital-acquired infections at a national, state, or local level over time, was used. Bundle components included pre- and postsurgical education and access to follow-up, peri- and intraoperative practice changes, and a risk stratification tool for postoperative dressing selection. Results: The bundle was initiated in April 2022. After use was established for 6 months, the SIR was evaluated in the fourth quarter of 2022. For this one quarter, the expected SIR for the hospital was 2.64, and the calculated SIR measured 0.38. In 2022, which included 3 months prebundle and 9 months postbundle, the expected SIR was 10.57, with a calculated SIR of just 0.66 for the full year. In 2023, the expected SIR was 11.10, with a calculated SIR of 0.27. The SSI rate reflects an observed 75% reduction in SSI between the years 2021 and 2023. Zero SSI have been observed from January to May 2024. For the patients who underwent planned CD, 98% received the full perioperative obstetric bundle. Discussion: The ongoing analysis and sharing of data, the implementation of standardized processes, and interdisciplinary collaboration were imperative to the success of this hospital's quality improvement project to reduce SSI for patients undergoing CD.

Improving access to outpatient computed tomography.

Demand for diagnostic imaging services in the United States continues to rise, posing challenges for health systems to maintain efficient scheduling processes. This study documents a quality improvement initiative undertaken at our institution in response to a surge in demand for outpatient imaging during 2022, which led to a notable scheduling backlog. By October 2022, the average scheduling interval, defined as the time from order placement to scheduled examination date, had increased from 2 weeks to 6 weeks. The objective of this initiative was to reduce the scheduling interval from 6 weeks to 10 days by January 2023. Utilizing feedback from schedulers, technologists, and radiologists, several interventions were implemented. The impact of each intervention was monitored with a control chart with weekly appointment delays tracked as a balancing measure. Initially, examination slots were double-booked for a period of 4 weeks to address the backlog, resulting in a reduction of the scheduling interval to 12 days (72 % decrease). Subsequently, examination slot duration was shorted from 20 to 15 min and contrast protocols were standardized across all sites. These adjustments further decreased the interval to 7 days (41 % reduction) over the following 9 weeks. While staffing shift adjustments had no impact on the scheduling interval, the introduction of an extra CT scanner reduced the interval to 3 days (57 % decrease). These interventions resulted in a notable increase in examination volume, from a weekly average of 722 to 860 examinations (19 % increase), approximately an additional $1,612,000 in annual revenue. Importantly, there was no change in the average appointment delay, which remained at 15 min over the study period. These improvements were sustained across the subsequent months and received favorable subjective feedback from staff. While the initiative successfully addressed scheduling inefficiencies across our health system, the rise in examination volumes has led to an increased turnaround time for completed reports. Future directions for enhancing the outpatient scheduling process include expanding online scheduling platforms, implementing systems to assess imaging appropriateness, and developing urgency stratification to prioritize time-sensitive examinations.

Gender and Racial Demographic Trends in the US Laryngology Workforce (1993-2022).

OBJECTIVES: To analyze demographic trends in laryngology fellowship training in the United States from 1993 to 2022, comparing periods before and after formalization of the fellowship within the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) in 2012. METHODS: A national database of fellowship-trained laryngologists (FTLs) and non-fellowship-trained laryngologists (nFTLs) practicing primarily laryngology was created by methodically compiling laryngologists via Internet search, with corroboration by regional laryngologists and vetting by senior laryngologists on this manuscript. Demographic variables included residency and/or fellowship graduation year, gender, race and ethnicity inferred through individuals' photos and surnames. NRMP match data from 2012 to 2022 were obtained from the American Laryngological Association. RESULTS: An average of 21 programs offered 23 positions in the NRMP match, with 14 programs (66.4%) filling 16 positions (68.8%) from 2012 to 2022. The 10-year FTL growth rate decreased from 25.4% (1993-2002) to 10.5% and 6.6% in subsequent periods. In May 2023, there were 349 active laryngologists, including 303 FTLs, in the United States. A total of 189 (62.4%) FTLs were men, 114 (37.6%) were women; 201 (66.2%) were White, 102 (33.8%) were non-White. Between the pre-NRMP and post-NRMP periods, the percentage of male FTLs decreased from 71.5% to 55.5%, female FTLs increased from 28.5% to 44.5%, and White FTLs decreased from 69.2% to 64.2%. Chi-squared analysis yielded a statistically significant association between gender and training period for FTLs (p = 0.004), but no statistically significant difference between race and training period. CONCLUSIONS: The post-NRMP period saw an expansion of laryngology fellowships and workforce diversification, reflecting trends observed in otolaryngology and medicine overall. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 2024.