A well-managed case of discontinuous anorectal injury caused by a personal watercraft treated by combining surgery and colonoscopy.

Background: Anorectal injury caused by personal watercraft (PWC)-related trauma is rare. However, PWC accidents have increased recently, and since patients tend to be younger, treatment strategies should consider anal function preservation in addition to saving lives. Case Presentation: A 30-year-old female patient who fell into the water when a PWC suddenly accelerated and injured her perineum with a forceful water jet was transported to our hospital. On examination, she was diagnosed with a traumatic rectal perforation with intraperitoneal findings and an anorectal injury. Emergency surgery, which involved direct suturing, temporary colostomy with intraoperative endoscopy for the rectal perforation, and anorectal reconstruction, was performed. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 19 without complications, and the colostomy was closed 5 months postoperatively. Conclusion: We encountered a case of multiple noncontinuous anorectal injuries due to a PWC accident that was successfully treated using a combination of surgery and intraoperative endoscopy.

Treatment of benign rectal stricture caused by repeated anal insertion by endoscopy and balloon dilation: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Benign rectal strictures can be categorized as primary (disease-related) and secondary (surgical anastomosis-related). Secondary strictures arise from surgical complications, whereas primary strictures have diverse etiologies, including various inflammatory conditions. Benign strictures are usually managed by surgery and endoscopy. We present an unusual etiology of benign rectal stricture caused by the repeated insertion of foreign objects into the rectum for sexual purposes, resulting in rectal injury and subsequent chronic inflammation. CASE SUMMARY: A 53-year-old man presented to the outpatient clinic of the Colorectal Surgery Department with symptoms of chronic constipation and bloody stools. The patient previously experienced rectal injury due to foreign object insertion for sexual purposes. Colonoscopy revealed benign circumferential narrowing of the rectum. He underwent treatment by endoscopic argon plasma coagulation and balloon dilation and follow-up as an outpatient for 4 months. A colonoscopy at the end of the follow-up period revealed no evidence of rectal stricture relapse. CONCLUSION: A history of rectal injury, followed by chronic inflammation, should be considered in patients with benign rectal strictures. Management with endoscopic argon plasma coagulation and balloon dilation can prevent the need for surgical resection of benign rectal strictures.

Incidence of Rectal Injury After Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Context: Rectal injury (RI) is a dreaded complication after radical prostatectomy (RP), increasing the risk of early postoperative complications, such as bleeding and severe infection/sepsis, and late sequelae, such as a rectourethral fistula (RUF). Considering its traditionally low incidence, uncertainty remains as to predisposing risk factors and management. Objective: To examine the incidence of RI after RP in contemporary series and to propose a pragmatic algorithm for its management. Evidence acquisition: A systematic literature search was performed using the Medline and Scopus databases. Studies reporting data on RI incidence were selected. Subgroup analyses were conducted to assess the differential incidence by age, surgical approach, salvage RP after radiation therapy, and previous benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)-related surgery. Evidence synthesis: Eighty-eight, mostly retrospective noncomparative, studies were selected. The meta-analysis obtained a pooled RI incidence of 0.58% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.46-0.73) in contemporary series with significant across-study heterogeneity (I2 = 100%, p < 0.00001). The highest RI incidence was found in patients undergoing open RP (1.25%; 95% CI 0.66-2.38) and laparoscopic RP (1.25%; 95% CI 0.75-2.08) followed by perineal RP (0.19%; 95% CI 0-276.95) and robotic RP (0.08%; 95% CI 0.02-0.31). Age ≥60 yr (0.56%; 95% CI 0.37-06) and salvage RP after radiation therapy (6.01%; 95% CI 3.99-9.05), but not previous BPH-related surgery (4.08%, 95% CI 0.92-18.20), were also associated with an increased RI incidence. Intraoperative versus postoperative RI detection was associated with a significantly decreased risk of severe postoperative complications (such as sepsis and bleeding) and subsequent formation of a RUF. Conclusions: RI is a rare, but potentially devastating, complication following RP. RI incidence was higher in patients ≥60 yr of age, and in those who underwent open/laparoscopic approach or salvage RP after radiation therapy. Intraoperative RI detection and repair apparently constitute the single most critical step to significantly decrease the risk of major postoperative complications and subsequent RUF formation. Conversely, intraoperatively undetected RI can lead more often to severe infective complications and RUF, the management of which remains poorly standardised and requires complex procedures. Patient summary: Accidental rectum tear is a rare, but potentially devastating, complication in men undergoing prostate removal for cancer. It occurs more often in patients aged 60 yr or older as well as in those who underwent prostate removal via an open/laparoscopic approach and/or prostate removal after radiation therapy for recurrent disease. Prompt identification and repair of this condition during the initial operation are the key to reduce further complications such as the formation of an abnormal opening between the rectum and the urinary tract.

Management of rectal injury and rectourinary fistula from radical prostatectomy.

Objective: This study aimed to demonstrate our management of rectal injury (RI) and rectourinary fistula (RUF) from radical prostatectomy (RP) and identify a possible factor that increased the chance of developing RUF. Materials and Methods: Between January 2011 and December 2019, a total of 14 cases of RI were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed, including preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative information. Results: In all 14 cases of RI, the average age at RP was 66.3 years (54-77). During the study period, 8 of 14 cases of RI occurred in our hospital, and the incidence of RI was 0.42%. RI was intraoperative recognition in 8 cases and delayed diagnosis in 6 cases. For immediate recognition, 4 of 8 cases were primarily repaired without developing RUF and did not require diverting colostomy and suprapubic cystostomy. RUF occurred in 10 cases including 4 cases of intraoperative recognition and all cases of delayed diagnosis. In a subgroup analysis of RI that occurred in our hospital, the timing for diagnosis was clinically and statistically significant difference (P = 0.029). Instantly detected RI during RP and intraoperative rectal repair resulted in no postoperative complication. Among all 10 cases of RUF, 5 cases were successfully repaired by modified York-Mason procedure with dartos tissue flap interposition. No major complications were reported. Conclusions: Incidence of RI was 0.42% and intraoperative recognition of RI was a key to prevent the development of RUF. Modified York-Mason procedure with dartos tissue flap interposition was an effective treatment for RUF.

Surgical management of colorectal injury in war.

The rate of colorectal trauma is 5-10 % in modern war conflicts. The most common causes include gunshots or shrapnel injuries; the contusion-laceration mechanism occurs in sporadic cases in the war zone. Despite modern surgical procedures, however, it is associated with a high rate of morbidity, especially if it is not diagnosed and treated in time. Surgical management is specified by simple scoring schemes - the colon injury scale, rectal injury scale and the Flint grading system. Colonic resection with primary or delayed anastomosis is not associated with a higher risk of complicated healing and is nowadays preferred over the construction of terminal stomas. These are indicated only for cases with severe hemodynamic instability in traumatic-hemorrhagic or septic shock with severe diffuse peritonitis. Trauma to the intraperitoneal segment of the rectum is treated in the same way as trauma to the colon. An extraperitoneal rectal injury without soft tissue devastation can be treated with or without a transanal suture. On the contrary, devastating injuries to the rectum including the pelvic soft tissues should be primarily controlled with a stoma with delayed reconstruction. Presacral drainage or rectal stump lavage are no longer recommended.

Severe anorectal injury secondary to jet ski accident: An important and increasing mechanism of injury.

Introduction: Traumatic injuries from jet ski-related accidents have increased in incidence over the past few decades. Anorectal injuries are uncommon but typically arise from high-speed jet ski accidents. We present a case of a severe anorectal injury from a fall off the back of an accelerating jet ski. Case report: This case reports on the presentation, operative findings and management of a 22-year-old female with major internal and external anal sphincter disruption sustained via an unusual traumatic mechanism. Operative findings identified a complete internal and external anal sphincter disruption at the 1 and 7 O'clock positions and extra-peritoneal rectal perforation. Washout, suture repair and an end-colostomy were performed. Conclusion: Understanding the potential severity of injury from the insult mechanism is paramount to triaging and managing trauma patients. Although this case describes an inconspicuous mechanism, the resulting trauma is significant and should prompt consideration in future cases. In addition, the article describes an approach to the repair of such injuries and the difficult decision relating to the role and type of defunctioning colostomy to protect any possible missed injuries in a complex traumatic environment, and in the protection of the anorectal repair.

Hypoxic Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Aggravate Rectal Injury Following Radiotherapy via MiR-122-5p.

Radiation-induced rectal injury is a common side effect of radiotherapy. Hypoxia often occurs after radiotherapy. This study aimed to explore the bystander effect of hypoxia on radiation-induced rectal injury. In vivo, apoptosis increased nearby the highly hypoxic area in the rectal tissues in the mouse models of radiation-induced rectal injury, indicating the potential involvement of hypoxia. In vitro, flow cytometry and Western blotting showed that both hypoxia and hypoxic human intestinal epithelial crypt (HIEC) cell supernatant promoted apoptosis in normoxic HIEC cells. The pro-apoptotic effect of extracellular vesicles (EVs) derived from hypoxic HIEC cell to normoxic HIEC cells was then determined. MiR-122-5p was chosen for further studies through a microRNA (miRNA) microarray assay and apoptosis was alleviated in cells receiving miR-122-5p inhibiting hypoxic EVs. Together, our study demonstrated that the miR-122-5p containing-EVs derived from hypoxic HIEC cells promoted apoptosis in normoxic HIEC cells. Hypoxic EV-derived miR-122-5p plays a critical pathologic role in radiation-induced rectal injury and may be a potential therapeutic target.

[Diagnosis and treatment of rectal injury during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Analysis of 7 cases].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the risk factors and management principles of rectal injury during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data on 7 cases of LRP complicated with rectal injury and treated in Huzhou Central Hospital from January 2010 to June 2021. Four of the 7 PCa patients were found with complete rectal rupture during LRP, of whom 2 were treated by laparoscopic rectal repair (LRR) and the other 2 by LRR + colostomy during surgery. Another case of rectal muscle injury also underwent LRR. Two cases of delayed rectal rupture were observed postoperatively and treated by colostomy + transrectal repair in the second-stage operation. RESULTS: The rectal injuries were found in the apex of the prostate in all the 7 cases, pathologically staged as pT2b��pT3b and with Gleason scores of 7��10. Postoperative follow-up lasted 2 to 18 months, during which the 5 cases of intraoperative rectal repair recovered well without complications, and of the 2 cases of postoperative rectal repair, 1 made a good recovery and the other 1 developed rectourethral fistula. CONCLUSION: Rectal injury during radical prostatectomy tends to occur in the apex of the prostate and can be effectively managed by laparoscopic repair. Meanwhile, attention should be paid to the postoperative complication of rectourethral fistula.

[Chinese expert consensus on multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment of radiation rectal injury (2021 edition)].

Radiation therapy plays a significant role in the integrated treatment for patients with pelvic malignancies, but may lead to radiation-induced rectal injury in some patients, which may affect their physical health and quality of life negatively. Patients with radiation-induced rectal injury are often complicated with pelvic multi-organ injury. Collaborative, multidisciplinary evaluation of pelvic injuries should be highlighted in clinical practices, including clinical, endoscopic, radiological and histopathologic evaluation. To determine the overall treatment strategy and develop individualized treatment strategy, it is necessary to assess the oncologic prognosis, severity and stage of radiation-induced rectal injury and clinical classification using different rating scales. Considering that the disease is self-limiting, non-surgical treatment should be performed for patients with early lesions, while surgical interventions should be performed as soon as possible for patients with severe complications. In terms of prevention of radiation-induced rectal injury, prevention should be targeted for patients at high risk of radiation-induced rectal injury through technique improvement, physical protection and drug prevention. This consensus aims to provide guidance for the clinical practice of radiation-induced rectal injury in China.

[Interpretation of Chinese expert consensus on multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment of radiation rectal injury (2021 edition)].

Although pelvic radiotherapy has played an important role in the treatment of malignant tumors, it is still difficult to avoid radiation damage within a certain period of time. In 2021, under the joint promotion of Colorectal Surgery Group of Chinese Medical Association Surgery Branch, Colorectal Surgeons Committee of Chinese Medical Doctor Association Surgeons Branch, Colorectal Surgeons Committee of Chinese Medical Doctor Association, and Colorectal Cancer Professional Committee of Chinese Anti-Cancer Association, Expert Group on Diagnosis and Treatment of Radiation Intestinal Injury has updated and formulated the 2021 edition of the "Chinese expert consensus on the multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment of radiation rectal injury" (hereinafter referred to as "Consensus"). This Consensus edition has major changes compared with the "Chinese consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of radiation proctitis (2018)", which mainly updates in the following aspects: (1) adjusting the name of radiation rectal injury: the term "radiation proctitis" was adjusted to "radiation rectal injury"; (2) advocating the concept of pelvic integral injury and the multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment model; (3) putting forward the clinical classification of diseases: the classification of the chronic rectal injury includes telangiectasia, ulcer, stenosis and mixed type; (4) carrying out individualized treatment based on the characteristics of the above-mentioned disease classification, and adjusting the recommended level of non-surgical treatment; (5) proposing specific guiding principles and details of surgical treatment: "damage control" and "expanded resection" principles, etc. This new edition (2021) of Consensus further refines the disease analysis and treatment strategies, which not only improves the guiding value of clinical practice, but also provides an important reference for the standardized diagnosis and treatment of radiation rectal injury in China.

[Chronic radiation-induced rectal injury after adjuvant radiotherapy for pelvic malignant tumors: report based on a phase 3 randomized clinical trial].

Objective: Radiotherapy is one of the standard treatments for pelvic malignant tumors. However, researches associated with intestinal radiation injury and the quality of life (QoL) of patients receiving radiotherapy were lacking in the past. This study aims to analyze the occurrence of radiation-induced rectal injury after adjuvant radiotherapy for pelvic malignant tumors and call for more attention on this issne. Methods: A retrospectively observational study was conducted. Case data of cervical cancer patients from the database of STARS phase 3 randomized clinical trial (NCT00806117) in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center were analyzed. A total of 848 cervical cancer patients who received adjuvant radiation following hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from February 2008 to August 2015 were recruited. The pelvic radiation dosage was 1.8 Gy/day or 2.0 Gy/day, five times every week, and the total dosage was 40-50 Gy. Among 848 patients, 563 patients received radiation six weeks after surgery, of whom 282 received adjuvant radiation alone and 281 received concurrent chemoradiotherapy (weekly cisplatin); other 285 patients received sequential chemoradiotherapy (paclitaxel and cisplatin). Acute adverse events, chronic radiation damage of rectum, and QoL were collected and analyed. The digestive tract symptoms and QoL were evaluated based on EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaires at one week after surgery (M0), during adjuvant therapy period (M1), and at 12 months and 24 months after the completion of treatments (M12 and M24), respectively. Higher scores in the functional catalog and overall quality of life indicated better quality of life, while higher scores in the symptom catalog indicated severe symptoms and worse QoL. Chronic radiation rectal injury was defined as digestive symptoms that were not improved within three months after radiotherapy. Grading standard of acute adverse events and chronic radiation rectal injury was according to the gastrointestinal part of National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE Version 4.0). Results: The mean total radiation dosage of 848 patients was (47.8±4.6) Gy. During adjuvant therapy, the common symptoms of acute intestinal dysfunction were nausea (46.0%, 390/848), vomiting (33.8%, 287/848), constipation (16.3%, 138/848) and abdominal pain (10.3%, 87/848). At M12 and M24, the number of 0 QLQ-C30 questionnaires collected was 346 and 250, respectively. QLQ-C30 questionnaires showed that the scores of nausea or vomiting, appetite decrease, diarrhea, constipation, etc. were improved obviously at M12 or M24 compared with those at M0 or during M1 (all P<0.05). As the extension of the follow-up time, the score of the overall QoL of patients gradually increased [M0: 59.7 (0.0-100.0); M1: 63.1 (0.0-100.0); M12: 75.2 (0.0-100.0); M24: 94.1 (20.0-120.0); H=253.800, P<0.001]. Twelve months after the completion of treatments, the incidence of chronic radiation rectal injury was 9.8% (34/346), mainly presenting as abdominal pain, constipation, stool blood, diarrhea, mostly at level 1 to 2 toxicity (33/34, 97.1%). One patient (0.3%) developed frequent diarrhea (>8 times/d), which was level 3 toxicity. Twenty-four months after all treatments, the incidence of chronic radiation rectal injury was 9.6% (24/250), which was not decreased significantly compared to that in the previous period (χ(2)=0.008, P=0.927). The symotoms of one patient with level 3 toxicity was not relieved. Conclusions: The common symptoms of patients with pelvic maligant tumors during postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy include nausea, vomiting, constipation, abdominal pain and diarrhea. These symptoms are alleviated obviously at 12 and 24 months after adjuvant radiotherapy, and the QoL is significantly improved. However, a few patients may develop chronic radiation rectal injury which is not improved for years or even decades, and deserves attention in clinical practice.

[Questionnaire investigation of radiation rectal injury with anxiety, depression and somatic disorder].

Objective: To observe the incidence and treatment of radiation rectal injury complicated with anxiety, depression and somatic symptom disorder. Methods: A cross-sectional survey research method was carried out. Patients with radiation rectal injury managed by members of the editorial board of Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery were the subjects of investigation. The inclusion criteria of the survey subjects: (1) patients suffered from pelvic tumors and received pelvic radiotherapy; (2) colonoscopy showed inflammatory reaction or ulcer in the rectum. Exclusion criteria: (1) patient had a history of psycho-somatic disease before radiotherapy; (2) patient was unable to use a smart phone, unable to read and understand the questions in the questionnaire displayed on the phone; (3) patient refused to sign an informed consent form. According to the SOMA self-rating scale, PHQ-15 self-rating scale, GAD-7 and PHQ-9 self-rating scale, the electronic questionnaire of "Psychological Survey of Radiation Proctitis" was designed. The questionnaire was sent to patients with radiation rectal injury managed by the committee through the WeChat group. Observational indicators: (1) radiation rectal injury symptom assessment: using SOMA self-rating scale, radiation rectal injury symptom classification: mild group (≤3 points), moderate group (4-6 points) and severe group (> 6 points); (2) incidence of anxiety, depression and physical disorder: using GAD-7, PHQ-9 and PHQ-15 self-rating scales respectively for assessment; (3) correlation of radiation rectal injury symptom grading with anxiety, depression, and somatic symptom disorder. Results: Seventy-one qualified questionnaires were collected, of which 41 (56.9%) were from Guangzhou. Among the 71 patients, 6 were males and 65 were females; the mean age was (55.7±9.3) years old and 48 patients (67.6%) were less than 60 years old; the median confirmed duration of radiation rectal injury was 2.0 (1.0, 5.0) years. (1) Evaluation of symptoms of radiation rectal injury: 18 cases of mild (25.4%), 27 cases of moderate (38.0%), and 26 cases of severe (36.6%). (2) Incidence of anxiety, depression and somatic disorder: 12 patients (16.9%) without comorbidities; 59 patients (83.1%) with anxiety, depression, or somatic disorder, of whom 2 patients only had anxiety, 1 patient only had depression, 9 only had somatic disorder, 2 had anxiety plus depression, 4 had anxiety plus somatic disorder, 2 had depression plus somatic disorder, and 40 had all three symptoms. (3) correlation of radiation rectal injury grading with anxiety, depression, and somatic symptom disorder: as compared to patients in mild group and moderate group, those in severe group had higher severity of anxiety and somatic symptom disorder (Z=-2.143, P=0.032; Z=-2.045, P=0.041), while there was no statistically significant difference of depression between mild group and moderate group (Z=-1.176, P=0.240). Pearson correlation analysis revealed that radiation rectal injury symptom score was positively correlated with anxiety (r=0.300, P=0.013), depression (r=0.287, P=0.015) and somatic symptom disorder (r=0.344, P=0.003). Conclusions: The incidence of anxiety, depression, and somatic symptom disorder in patients with radiation rectal injury is extremely high. It is necessary to strengthen the diagnosis and treatment of somatic symptom disorder, so as to alleviate the symptoms of patients with pelvic perineum pain and improve the quality of life.

[Meta analysis of diseased bowel resection versus diversion enterostomy in the treatment of late severe complications of chronic radiation-induced rectal injury].

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of diseased bowel resection and diversion enterostomy in the treatment of late severe complications of chronic radiation-induced late rectal injury (RLRI). Methods: Studies about comparison of diseased bowel resection and diversion enterostomy in the treatment of late severe complications of chronic RLRI were screened and retrieved from databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP, CBM and Wanfang. The following terms in Chinese were used to search [Title/Abstract]: radiation-induced intestinal injury, radiation proctitis, surgery. The following English terms were used to search: Radiation-induced intestinal injury, Bowel injury from radiation, Radiation proctitis, Surgery, Colostomy. Literature inclusion criteria: (1) studies with control groups, published at home and abroad publicly, about the postoperative effects of diseased bowel resection vs. diversion enterostomy on RLRI patients with late severe complications; (2) the period of the study performed in the literatures must be clear; (3) patients at the preoperative diagnosis for RLRI with refractory bleeding, narrow, obstruction, perforation or fistula, etc.; (4) diseased bowel resection included Hartmann, Dixon, Bacon and Parks; diversion enterostomy included colostomy and ileostomy; (5) if the studies were published by the same institution or authors at the same time, the study with the biggest sample size was chosen; studies conducted in different time with different subjects were simultaneously included; (6) at least one prognostic indicator of the following parameters should be included: the improvement of symptoms, postoperative complications, mortality, and reversed stomas rate. The stoma reduction rate was defined as the ratio of successful closure of colostomy after diseased bowel resection and diversion enterostomy. The method of direct calculation or the method of convert into direct calculation were used for stoma reduction rate. Exclusion criteria: (1) a single-arm study without control group; (2) RLRI patients did not undergo diseased bowel resection or diversion enterostomy at the first time; (3) RLRI patients with distant metastasis; (4) the statistical method in the study was not appropriate; (5) the information was not complete, such as a lack of prognosis in the observational indexes. After screening literatures according to criteria, data retrieval and quality evaluation were carried out. Review Manager 5.3 software was used for Meta-analysis. Sensitivity analysis was used to exam the stability of results. Funnel diagram was used to analyze the bias of publication. Results: A total of 11 literatures were enrolled, including 426 RLRI patients with late severe complications, of whom 174 underwent diseased bowel resection (resection group) and 252 underwent diversion enterostomy (diversion group), respectively. Compared with diversion group, although resection group had a higher morbidity of complication (35.1% vs. 15.9%, OR=2.67, 95% CI: 1.58 to 4.53, P<0.001), but it was more advantageous in symptom improvement (94.2% vs. 64.1%, OR=6.19, 95% CI: 2.47 to 15.52, P<0.001) and stoma reductions (62.8% vs. 5.1%, OR=15.17, 95% CI: 1.21 to 189.74, P=0.030), and the differences were significant (both P<0.05). No significant difference in postoperative mortality was found between the two groups (10.1% vs. 18.8%, OR=0.74, 95% CI: 0.21 to 2.59, P=0.640). There were no obvious changes between the two groups after sensitivity analysis for the prognostic indicators (the symptoms improved, postoperative complications, mortality, and reversed stomas rate) compared with the meta-analysis results before exclusion, suggesting that the results were robust and credible. Funnel diagram analysis suggested a small published bias. Conclusions: Chronic RLRI patients with late severe complications undergoing diseased bowel resection have higher risk of complication, while their long-term mortality is comparable to those undergoing diversion enterostomy. Diseased bowel resection is better in postoperative improvement of symptoms and stoma reduction rate.

Extraperitoneal rectal trauma in a patient with multiple gunshot wounds: A case report and literature review.

Penetrating rectal trauma is an uncommon presentation, particularly in centres with low rates of trauma, and requires a high index of suspicion to identify and treat. Management of penetrating rectal trauma has evolved over several decades and previously included proximal diversion, distal rectal washout, and presacral drainage as the primary surgical maneuvers to reduce mortality. Recently, a more conservative approach has been adopted, as the applicability of combat experience to the civilian setting has been questioned. In this report, a case of extraperitoneal rectal injury in a patient with multiple gunshot wounds provides a backdrop for literature review and discussion of the modern diagnostic and management approaches to penetrating rectal trauma.

Nrf2 alleviates radiation-induced rectal injury by inhibiting of necroptosis.

Radiation-induced rectal injury is one of the common side effects of pelvic radiation therapy. This study aimed to explore the role of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) in this process. In vivo, knockout (KO) of Nrf2 led to aggravated radiation-induced histological changes in the rectums. In vitro, interference or overexpression of Nrf2 resulted in enhanced or reduced radiosensitivity in human intestinal epithelial crypts (HIEC) cells, respectively. A potential relationship between Nrf2 and necroptosis was identified using RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and western blotting (WB), which showed that necroptosis-related proteins were negatively correlated with Nrf2. Upon treatment with necrostatin-1 (Nec-1), the increased radiosensitivity, decreased cell viability, increased γH2AX foci formation, and decreased mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) in Nrf2-interfered HIEC cells were alleviated. A significant recovery in morphological alterations was also observed in Nrf2 KO mice administered with Nec-1. Taken together, our results highlight the important protective effect of Nrf2 in radiation-induced rectal injury through the inhibition of necroptosis, and the physiological significance of necroptosis in radiation-induced rectal injury.

Successful detection of rectal injury during laparoscopic surgery using a rectal probe in a patient with deep endometriosis.

Laparoscopic surgery has become the gold standard treatment for endometriosis. Surgical treatment of deep endometriosis with colorectal involvement is challenging. It requires complete surgical excision of lesions despite a high risk of complications that include rectal injury, rectovaginal fistula and pelvic abscess. An intraoperative air leak test allows detection of rectal injury and reduces postoperative complications. We report a case of successful management of rectal injury during laparoscopic surgery using a rectal probe even though air leak tests were negative. A 45-year-old woman with severe endometriosis and rectal involvement underwent total laparoscopic hysterectomy combined with rectal shaving. A pinhole injury that reached the rectal muscularis layer without breaching the mucosal layer was identified using a rectal probe after negative air leak tests. The injury was repaired uneventfully. Our experience suggests that using a rectal probe could be helpful for early detection and safe repair of rectal injury during surgery.

Injury and treatment patterns of ballistic pelvic fractures by anatomic location.

INTRODUCTION: Pelvic ballistic injuries threaten critical gastrointestinal, vascular, and urinary structures. We report the treatment patterns and injury profiles of ballistic pelvic fractures and the association between location of ballistic fractures of the pelvis and visceral injuries. METHODS: A prospectively collected database at an academic level I trauma center was reviewed for clinical and radiographic data on patients who sustained one or more ballistic fractures of the pelvis. Main outcomes compared included: procedures with orthopedic surgery, emergent surgery, concomitant intrapelvic injuries, and mortality. RESULTS: Eighty-six patients were included. Eight patients (9.3%) underwent surgical debridement with orthopedic surgery, no ballistic pelvic fractures required surgical stabilization. The anatomical locations of ballistic pelvic fractures included: 10 (14.7%) anterior ring, 13 (19.1%) posterior ring, 27 (39.7%) anterior column, and 18 (20.9%) posterior column. There was a statistically significant association between anterior ring and rectal injury. The association between anterior ring injury and bladder injury approached significance. CONCLUSIONS: This case series included 86 patients with a ballistic fracture of the pelvis, none requiring pelvic ring surgical stabilization. The unpatterned behavior of these injuries demands a high suspicion for visceral injury, with special attention to the rectum and bladder in the setting of anterior ring involvement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

The Road to Survival for Haemodynamically Unstable Patients With Open Pelvic Fractures.

Management of haemodynamically unstable pelvic ring injuries has been simplified into treatment algorithms to streamline care and emergent decision making in order to improve patient outcomes whilst decreasing mortality and morbidity. Pelvic ring injuries are most commonly a result of high-velocity and energy forces that exert trauma to the pelvic bones causing not only damage to the bone but the surrounding soft-tissue, organs, and other structures and are usually accompanied by injuries to other parts of the body resulting in a polytraumatised patient. Open pelvic fractures are a rare subset of pelvic ring fractures that are on the more severe end of the pelvic fracture continuum and usually produce uncontrolled haemorrhage from fractured bone, retroperitoneal haematomas, intraabdominal bleeding from bowel injury, soft tissue injuries to the anus, perineum, and genitals, fractures of the pelvic bones, causing bleeding from cancellous bone, venous, and arterial injuries combined with bleeding from concomitant injuries. This is a very complex and challenging clinical situation and timely and appropriate decisions and action are paramount for a positive outcome. Consequently, open pelvic fractures have an extremely high rate of mortality and morbidity and outcomes remain poor, despite evidence-based improvements in treatment, knowledge, and identification of haemorrhage; in the pre-hospital, critical care, and operative settings. In the future utilisation of haemostatic drugs, dressings, devices, and procedures may aid in the time to haemorrhage control.

MiR-122-5p increases radiosensitivity and aggravates radiation-induced rectal injury through CCAR1.

Radiation-induced rectal injury is a major side-effect observed in patients with pelvic malignancies who receive radiotherapy. MicroRNA (miRNA), involved in many cellular biological processes, can be disturbed by ionizing radiation (IR). In this study, we have investigated the function of microRNA-122-5p (miR-122-5p) in radiation-induced rectal injury. MiR-122-5p levels in the serum of rectal cancer patients or in the rectal tissues of C57BL/6 mice before and after IR were detected by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). We found that the miR-122-5p levels were significantly up-regulated in patients' serum or in mice rectal tissues after IR. Elevation of miR-122-5p levels sensitized human intestinal epithelial crypt (HIEC) cells to IR both in vitro and in vivo. MiR-122-5p mimic was transfected to HIEC cells and the downstream targets were predicted by bioinformatic analysis. Two putative target sites of miR-122-5p in the 3'UTR of the cell cycle and apoptosis regulator 1 (CCAR1) mRNA were found and verified by luciferase reporter assay. Overexpression of miR-122-5p or silencing CCAR1 combined with IR significantly inhibited cell survival, enhanced radiosensitivity, and increased cell apoptosis compared to that in the negative control group in vitro. In vivo injection of miR-122-5p antagomir after IR significantly alleviated radiation-induced rectal injury in mice. These results suggest that miR-122-5p aggravates radiation-induced rectal injury through targeting CCAR1.

Noniatrogenic Colorectal Barotrauma with Extraperitoneal Rectal Injury.

We present the case of a 22-year-old male who presented to us with abdomen discomfort with subcutaneous emphysema in the abdomen and lower chest, following a prank played by his friend who had inserted a nozzle through his anal orifice and pumped high-pressure condensed air through it. Computed tomography showed evidence of air pockets in the ischiorectal fossa and pelvis. Intraoperatively, we found large-bowel and small-bowel distension with large-bowel serosal tears and rectal tears. The tears were primarily sutured and a transverse loop colostomy was fashioned to facilitate healing of rectal wounds and to relieve the distension. The colostomy was closed after 8 weeks. The postoperative period turned out to be uneventful. We intend to present this case to sensitize the readers about the unusual mode of presentation and our management which we hope would help the medical fraternity who might encounter similar scenarios.