Costs, efficiency, and patient-reported outcomes associated with suture-mediated percutaneous closure for atrial fibrillation ablation: Secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the cost and efficiency of suture-mediated percutaneous closure (SMC) compared to manual compression (MC) after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. SMC has been demonstrated to be efficacious in reducing hemostasis and bedrest times after AF ablation. To date, randomized data comparing the direct and indirect cost between the two techniques have not been described. METHODS: We conducted a 1:1 randomized trial comparing SMC to MC following AF ablation. The primary endpoints have been previously published. However, secondary endpoints pertinent to indirect cost including complication rates, hospital utilization (i.e., delays in discharge, additional patient encounters, nursing utilization), pain, patient reported outcomes, as well as the direct costs of care associated with AF ablation were collected. We also performed secondary analysis of the primary endpoint to evaluate for a learning curve, and subgroups analysis comparing efficacy across different numbers of access sites and compared to those in the MC group with a figure-of-eight suture (Fo8), that could potentially have impacted the relative efficiency of the procedure. RESULTS: A total of 107 patients were randomized and included: 53 in the SMC group and 54 in MC. A learning curve was observed in the SMC group between the first and second half of the study group (p = 0.037), with no such difference in the MC group. After accounting for the number of access sites, time to hemostasis remained shorter in the SMC Group (p = 0.002). Compared to those in the Fo8 arm (n = 37), the time to hemostasis remained shorter in the SMC group (p = 0.001). Among those planned for same-day discharge, there were more delays in the MC group (31.5% vs. 11.3%, p = 0.0144). Rates of major and minor complications were similar between SMC and MC groups at discharge (p = 0.243) and 30 days (p = 1.00), as were nursing utilization, self-reported pain, and overall patient reported outcomes. The overall cost of care related to the procedure was similar between the MC and SMC groups ($56 533.65 [$45 699.47, $66 987.64] vs. $57 050.44 [$47 251.40, $66 426.34], p = 0.601). CONCLUSION: SMC has been shown to decrease time to hemostasis and ambulation and facilitate earlier same-day discharge after AF ablation without an increase in direct or indirect costs.

[Outpatient coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions before and after the COVID-19 pandemic: experience of the Versailles hospital centre]. / Coronarographie et angioplastie coronaire ambulatoire avant et après la pandémie de COVID-19 : expérience du centre hospitalier de Versailles.

BACKGROUND: Same day discharge (SDD) diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) are increasingly performed, and indications extend to more complex procedures and more fragile patients. We report the evolution of SDD interventional cardiology activity in our centre since 2016, particularly before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Secondarily, we analysed the feasibility and safety of SDD PCI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analysed the number and percentage of SDD coronary angiograms and PCIs (elective or ad hoc), during 4 periods of 11 months each, from September 2016 to July 2024. Periods 1 and 2 took place before COVID-19, periods 3 and 4 after. We also compared the rate of complications and conversion to hospitalisation between periods 1-2 and 4. RESULTS: A total of 9587 procedures were analysed, including 1558 SDD procedures. The total number of SDD interventional cardiology procedures increased progressively over the 4 periods, from 146 SDD procedures (7.5%) in 2016-2017 to 620 (27.2%) in 2023-2024. This increase included both diagnostic coronary angiograms (respectively: 10.9%; 12.2%; 33.6% then 28.9%) and PCIs (respectively: 0.9%; 5.6%; 16.1% then 24.4%). In the immediate post-COVID-19 period, a significant increase, uncorrelated with the natural progression, was observed for SDD diagnostic coronary angiography and ad-hoc PCI. There were no deaths or serious complications, the rate of minor complications (1.1%) and conversion to conventional hospitalisation (4.5%) were low. CONCLUSION: Provided a careful patient selection and rigorous organisation, SDD coronary angiography and PCI can safely be performed. The increase in the SDD interventional procedures, favoured by organisational (COVID-19) or economic constraints, need to be amplified.

[Outpatient PCI in France: data from the France PCI registry]. / L'angioplastie coronaire ambulatoire en France : données du registre France PCI.

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the preferred method of revascularization for chronic coronary syndromes. Outpatient PCI has demonstrated, in addition to its reliability and safety, the comfort of patients and the reduction of costs that weigh on our healthcare systems. Nevertheless, it remains largely underutilized in France, with significant disparities between centers, particularly between private and public ones. This article provides an overview of outpatient PCI in France based on the France PCI registry and allows us to position ourselves in relation to our European neighbors.

National trends and costs of same day discharge in patients undergoing elective minimally invasive colectomy.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery Pathways (ERPs) have enabled safe same day discharge (SDD) of select patients after elective minimally invasive colectomy. We aimed to analyse the financial impact of SDD in these cases. METHODS: We queried the Nationwide Readmission Database (2016-2019) and included patients with a hospital length of stay ≤2 days after minimally invasive elective colectomy. Propensity score matched pairs of patients discharged on the day of the operation and those discharged on post operative day 1 or 2 were compared. Our primary outcome was the combined cost of hospitalization and readmission. RESULTS: SDD patients had lower comorbidity (33 â€‹% vs 21 â€‹%) and illness severity (79 â€‹% vs 63 â€‹%), more Medicare insurance (44 â€‹% vs 38 â€‹%), and more benign neoplasms (52 â€‹% vs 17 â€‹%). Most SDD patients underwent right colectomy (89 â€‹%). Across 647 matched pairs, total cost was significantly lower in SDD patients ($8000 vs. $12,900; p â€‹< â€‹0.001) due to cheaper index hospitalizations. No difference in readmission rates or costs emerged. CONCLUSION: SDD reduced costs of index hospitalization and may be cost-effective in a select cohort of healthier patients.

Impact of a dedicated radial lounge on same-day discharge percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: The same-day discharge (SDD) program after elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a safe strategy that allows for the optimization of hospital resources. However, the lack of adequate infrastructure and a specially targeted care model may limit its implementation. Our center developed an outpatient care model based on an area designed for percutaneous procedures called radial lounge (RL). AIMS: Evaluate the efficacy and safety of the RL care model: (1) SDD rate, (2) patient experience, (3) major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) (in-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year mortality and intervention), and (4) vascular access complication. SECONDARY OBJECTIVE:  Impact of RL SDD rate on total elective SDD-PCI volume. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study at a cardiovascular hospital, including consecutive patients undergoing elective PCI between 2015 and 2022 who were admitted to the conventional hospitalization area (CHA) or the RL about the stated objectives. Patient experience was assessed using the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey. RESULTS: A total of 5466 elective PCI procedures were included: 2102 in the RL and 3364 in the CHA. The SDD rate was 85.2% in the RL group and 54% in the CHA. After the implementation of RL, a significant increase in the volume of elective SDD-PCI was observed and patient satisfaction improved significantly (p < 0.005) with CHA. Finally, a greater amount of MACEs were not observed in the RL. CONCLUSIONS: The PCI program in RL proved to be safe and effective. It showed a higher rate of SDD and a significant improvement in patient experience was observed without affecting safety.

Continuous monitoring after laparoscopic Roux-En-Y gastric bypass: a pathway to ambulatory care surgery - a pilot study.

Same-day discharge (SDD) after Laparoscopic Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB) faces resistance due to possible undetected postoperative complications. These present with changes in vital signs, which continuous remote monitoring devices can detect. This study compared continuous vital signs monitoring using the Isansys Patient Status Engine™ with standard nursing vital signs measurements to assess the device's reliability in postoperative surveillance of patients undergoing LRYGB. We conducted a pilot study including patients who underwent LRYGB. During their hospital stay, patients were continuously monitored using the Isansys Patient Status Engine™ with Lifetouch™, Lifetemp™, and Nonin Pulse Oximeter™ sensors. The heart rate (HR), body temperature, and oxygen saturation (SpO2) collected by the device were compared with standard nursing assessments. Thirteen patients with a mean body mass index of 41.5 ± 4.4 kg/m2 were included. No major complications occurred. The median HR assessed by standard and continuous monitoring did not significantly differ (75.5 [69-88] vs. 77 [66-91] bpm, p = 0.995), nor did the mean values of SpO2 (94.7 ± 2.0 vs. 93.7 ± 1.8%, p = 0,057). A significant difference was observed in median body temperature between the nursing staff and the monitoring device (36.3 [36.1-36.7] vs. 36.1 [34.5-36.6] degrees Celsius, p = 0.012), with a tendency for lower temperature measurements by the device. In conclusion, this is the first study on continuous postoperative surveillance using the Isansys Patient Status Engine™ monitoring device for LRYGB patients. Our results introduce a novel tool for more efficient surgery. Prospective randomized experimental studies are warranted to evaluate this method's efficacy and safety.

Anastomotic metabolic and bariatric surgeries with same-day discharge: 30-day outcomes of a cohort from a high-volume center in Canada.

BACKGROUND: On the basis of our extensive experience in same-day discharge (SDD) sleeve gastrectomy, we extended this management strategy to anastomotic metabolic and bariatric surgeries (MBS). OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively analyze early outcomes (≤30 d) after anastomotic MBS with planned SDD (≤12 hr). SETTING: University Hospital, Canada; Public Practice. METHODS: SDD anastomotic MBS were proposed with strict preoperative criteria and included single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB), and single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass (SASI). Enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery protocols and post-anesthesia care unit criteria were followed. Unplanned overnight stay, emergency department (ED) visit, readmission, morbidity-mortality, and reintervention rates were analyzed. RESULTS: Since 2021, 208 patients (191 female and 17 male) have undergone SDD anastomotic MBS, with 76% conversion procedures: 92 SADI-S, 72 RYGB, 35 OAGB, and 9 SASI (mean age = 41.4 yr and mean preoperative body mass index = 41.9 kg/m2). Unplanned overnight stays and ED visits were 4.8% and 4.3%, respectively. Readmission rate was 5.8% (5 SADI-S, 5 RYGB, 1 OAGB, and 1 SASI). Overall morbidity rate was 14.9%, including 3.9% major complications. Within 30 days postoperatively, there were 2 duodenal leaks, 1 intrabdominal collection, 1 common bile duct stenosis, and 1 acute appendicitis in the SADI-S group. There were 2 occlusions on the jejunojejunal anastomosis and 1 bleeding on the gastrojejunal anastomosis in the RYGB group. Five (2.4%) required reintervention with no mortality. CONCLUSIONS: We report low and acceptable rates of unplanned overnight stay, readmission, and reintervention. Early outcomes suggest that SDD anastomotic MBS seems safe and feasible with an experienced team, selective criteria, and appropriate postoperative follow-up.

Same-Day Discharge for Elective Pediatric Laparoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Insertion is Safe and Increasing in Frequency; a NSQIP Pediatric Retrospective Review 2017 to 2021.

BACKGROUND: There is limited literature reviewing same-day discharge for elective pediatric gastrostomy tube placement. Our aim was to assess the outcomes and national trends of same-day discharge following elective pediatric laparoscopic gastrostomy. METHODS: ACS NSQIP-P registry data from 2017 to 2021 was used to evaluate elective pediatric laparoscopic gastrostomy patients who presented from home and discharged home with a diagnosis of failure to thrive, feeding difficulty or dysphagia. Patients discharged same-day postoperatively (SDD) were compared to those discharged 1-2 days postoperatively (non-SDD) for the primary outcome of unplanned 30-day readmission. Secondary outcomes included bleeding events, wound infection, and 30-day reoperation. RESULTS: There were 5,947 patients identified; 4.7% were discharged same-day. The annual rate of SDD over 5 years went from 2.7% to 4.6%-4.8% to 4.5%-6.3%. There were no significant differences between SDD and non-SDD patients for early readmission or reoperation (0.7% vs 0.3%, p = 0.279), 30-day unplanned readmission (8.5% vs 8.0%, p = 0.407), reoperation (0.1% vs 1.4%, p = 1.000), or any other complications (p > 0.05). Binary logistic regression found pre-operative steroid use within 30 days increased risk of serious complication (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.29-3.15, p = 0.002) and 30-day readmission or reoperation (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.34-3.27, p = 0.001). All 6 patients (0.1%) who required reoperation within 3 days were identified prior to discharge, and none of the 16 patients readmitted within 3 days of surgery required reoperation. CONCLUSION: Though rates of same-day discharge following pediatric gastrostomy tube placement are low, they continue to increase annually. There were no significant differences in outcomes between same-day and non-same-day day discharge for elective cases presenting from and discharging home. In non-steroid using patients, same-day discharge following laparoscopic gastrostomy can be a safe option. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE (I-V): Level III.

Prevalence, trends, and outcomes of same-day discharge following elective percutaneous coronary intervention: a retrospective observational cohort study using routinely-collected health data.

AIMS: To identify the prevalence, trends, and outcomes of same-day discharge following elective percutaneous coronary intervention among six public hospitals in one Australian State. METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective observational research design was used. A total of 4387 cases were obtained from the State Cardiac Outcomes Registry and National Hospital Cost Data Collection. The two datasets were linked using identifiable data items. Patients were those who had elective percutaneous coronary intervention between December 2012 and December 2019 either discharged the same day of the procedure or the next day. Data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The overall same-day discharge prevalence was 6.5%, with a trend increasing from 0.2% in 2013 to 9.0% in 2019. The prevalence varied at the individual hospital level. Two hospitals did not perform same-day discharge during the study period. The remaining hospitals demonstrated variability in same-day discharge prevalence, with the highest from one hospital being 28.2% in 2019. Almost all same-day discharge patients experienced no complications during or following percutaneous coronary intervention within 24 hours. Compared to next-day discharge, same-day discharge reduced the length of stay by 18 hours and conferred an average of $3695 cost-savings per patient. CONCLUSIONS: There was limited implementation of same-day discharge in the six public hospitals contributing data to this study. Improvement in the same-day discharge rate could result in better hospital resource utilisation and reduce low-value care. Hence, strategies to implement and promote same-day discharge are warranted.

Same-Day Discharge After a Minimally Invasive Colectomy: A Successful Approach to Patient Selection.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have been shown to decrease inpatient length of stay (LOS) and improve surgical outcomes in elective abdominal colorectal procedures. Discharging a patient home after a minimally invasive colectomy on the same calendar day is a multifactorial decision that takes into account the patient's decision and baseline condition, social factors, intraoperative findings, and postoperative recovery status. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of same-day discharge (SDD) following minimally invasive colectomy within an ERAS protocol in a community hospital setting in Houston, Texas. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, all consecutive elective cases were performed by a single surgeon from April 2022 to April 2023. This retrospective analysis aims to report a single senior surgeon's experience of the safety, feasibility, and benefits of same-day discharge after minimally invasive colectomy in preselected patients. Same-day discharge was defined as a discharge on the same calendar day without an overnight stay. Differences between specific groups were compared using the Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Of 86 non-emergent colectomies, 41 patients (47.7%) were successfully discharged on the same day. The median age of the patients was 63.50 years (interquartile range (IQR) 18). The cohort included 37 females (43%) and 49 males (57%). The median LOS was one day. The median operating time was 148.50 minutes (IQR 68.25). The median intraoperative fluid usage was 1500 mL (IQR 36.25), and the median estimated blood loss (EBL) was 25 mL (IQR 36.25). No readmissions among the SDD patients (0%), while three readmissions were reported in patients who stayed overnight (3.4%).  Conclusion: Same-day discharge after a minimally invasive colectomy is feasible when there is a well-established ERAS protocol and there is adequate education for patients and staff. Adequate patient selection is crucial. Patients with multiple comorbidities and a lack of a support network are not suitable candidates.

Episode-of-care costs of total knee arthroplasty: Outpatient versus inpatient postoperative care protocol.

BACKGROUND: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the most commonly performed joint replacement procedure in North America. Few studies have successfully evaluated the episode-of-care cost (EOCC) of common elective orthopedic procedures using an activity-based costing (ABC) framework. The objective of this study is to compare the EOCC of same-day discharge versus inpatient TKA using an activity-based costing methodology. METHODS: An observational case-control study was conducted comparing the EOCC of 25 consecutive patients who underwent same-day discharge (SDD) TKA and 25 consecutive patients who underwent same-day admission (SDA) TKA at an academic center. The EOCC was generated using an ABC framework. RESULTS: The median total EOCC for outpatient TKA was $7,243.26 CAD (IQR=614.12), while the median EOCC in the inpatient group was $8,303.94 CAD (IQR=1,157.77). The costs incurred secondary to the hospital admission were the main driver of the increased cost for inpatients. The mean length of stay for admitted patients was 2.45 days (SD=1,52). Patients in the outpatient group were younger (p < 0.01) and had a lower mean Charlson Comorbidity Index group (p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in gender, BMI, ASA scores, and complication rates between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Through the application of an ABC framework, this value-based healthcare study demonstrates that outpatient procedures are a cost-effective approach to knee arthroplasty. Our findings demonstrate that the total cost of outpatient TKA was on average 15% ($1,060 CAD) lower than the cost of TKA with the standard inpatient postoperative care protocol.

[Outpatient coronary angiography and angioplastie/ why, how and for wich patients?] / Coronarographie et angioplastie coronaire ambulatoire ; pourquoi, comment, pour quels patients ?

There is great heterogeneity in lengths of stay in interventional cardiology but the number of outpatient procedures is increasing. The expected benefits of an outpatient procedure are numerous and non-inferiority of this strategy has been demonstrated. Proper selection of patients eligible for this treatment is essential to minimize the risks of unplanned hospitalization and early complications. It is based on clinical, medico-social and organizational criteria. Perfect management of the care pathway based on an organizational unit and a geographical unit is essential.

[Same-day discharge for left main artery PCI: how to process?] / L'angioplastie du Tronc commun gauche en ambulatoire : Comment s'y prendre ?

The steady development of same-day discharge (SDD) PCIs in recent years means that, by 2024, we will be able to tackle increasingly complex lesions, including those of the left main artery. This strategy is supported by the literature, but requires an appropriate patient selection (based on medical and social criteria) and precise assessment of the anatomical complexity of the lesion and the foreseeable risks of the PCI. Strict adherence to pre-established service protocols for patient preparation and follow-up, as well as the establishment of clinical and paraclinical criteria for discharge to a conventional hospital unit, are essential to the success of an SDD PCI program.

Safety of gastric bypass with same-day discharge: a propensity score-matched analysis of the Dutch Audit for treatment of Obesity.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery with same-day discharge (SDD) is becoming increasingly common. Nevertheless, there is limited data available comparing gastric bypass patients with SDD to those with overnight hospitalization. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the short-term outcomes of gastric bypass with SDD compared to overnight hospitalization in The Netherlands. SETTING: Retrospective database study with the use of the Dutch national registry. METHODS: Patients who underwent gastric bypass surgery in 2022 were included and propensity score matching was performed to compare SDD with patients discharged on postoperative days (POD) 1-4. The primary outcome was the occurrence of severe complications within 30 days postoperative. RESULTS: A total of 775 SDD patients were matched with 1550 patients discharged on POD 1-4. The occurrence of severe complications was .9% in both groups (P = 1.000), and there were no significant differences in reoperations or mortality. A significant difference was observed in the readmission rate, with 3.9% in the SDD group compared to 1.6% in the other group (P = .001). A proportionally small, yet statistically significant difference favored the control group regarding anastomotic leakages (.6% versus 0%, P = .004) and unspecified surgical complications (1.4% versus .5%, P = .028). CONCLUSION: Gastric bypass with SDD is safe, with no increased risk of short-term severe complications, reoperations, or mortality. However, SDD is associated with a higher 30-day readmission rate compared to patients who stay overnight in the hospital after surgery.

Local Infiltration Analgesia Is Superior to Regional Nerve Blocks for Total Hip Arthroplasty: Less Falls, Better Mobility, and Same-Day Discharge.

Background: Multimodal analgesia in total hip arthroplasty (THA) provides better pain control, mobility, and reduced side effects compared to monotherapies. Local infiltration analgesia (LIA) and regional nerve blocks (RNBs) are commonly used throughout these protocols. This study aimed to compare these procedures as part of a multimodal analgesia protocol for patients undergoing THA. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of 1100 consecutive elective primary THAs was performed in 996 patients between June 2018 and December 2021. The RNB consisted of a preoperative continuous femoral nerve catheter and single-shot obturator nerve block, and LIA consisted of the intraoperative infiltration of weight-based bupivacaine. Results: A total of 579 (52.6%) patients received RNB, and 521 (47.4%) received LIA. Mean oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) during the first four hours postoperatively were significantly lower for LIA group (p < 0.001). However, the numeric pain rating scale in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) was similar between groups. Patients with LIA had significantly greater first ambulation distance in the PACU (p < 0.001), higher successful same-day discharge rate (p = 0.029), fewer falls (p = 0.041), and less refill OMEs post-discharge (p < 0.001) than RNB. Conclusions: In the setting of similar pain management between groups and better functional outcomes for LIA, the use of minimally invasive procedures like LIA for pain control following THA is favorable.

Same-day discharge coronary interventions: How to succeed?

Percutaneous coronary interventions(PCI) are the cornerstone of treatment in patients with coronary artery disease, generating substantial costs for the healthcare system. Considerable improvement in PCI technique, stent technology and antiplatelet therapy led to a complication rate of <5%, a success rate of >95% and lack of routine cardiothoracic surgical support. Thereby, the concept of same-day discharge following PCI has been proposed due to comparable efficacy, safety, and socioeconomic benefits to inpatient PCI. Although single-vessel disease was the primary indication for outpatient (OP) PCI, more complex scenarios such as multivessel disease, left main disease and chronic total occlusions were shown to be feasible and safe in OP setting as well. Currently available data shows that OP PCI leads to cost optimization, increased PCI center capacity, decrease in nosocomial infections rate and increased patient satisfaction, along with good clinical outcomes. Although OP PCI seems promising in a subset of well-prepared and compliant patients without severe comorbidities, there are some challenges to overcome before its routine implementation. To prevent unnecessary hospitalizations and unsafe same-day discharges, interventional cardiology teams should be trained to perform reliable risk-benefit assessments. Standardized forms should be created to obtain informed consent and instruct OP PCI patients and their relatives about postprocedural management. Here, we summarize the available data on OP and inpatient PCI outcomes, discuss the opportunities and challenges of OP PCI and propose a periprocedural patient management checklist, with the goal of facilitating OP PCI implementation in interventional cardiology centers.

Same Day Discharge Total Knee Arthroplasty: Hospital Demonstrates Similar Outcomes to Ambulatory Surgery Center in a More Complex Patient Population.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes between patients undergoing same-day discharge (SDD) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at an ambulatory surgery center (ASC) versus a tertiary care university hospital setting. METHODS: A single tertiary academic center's institutional database was reviewed for patients who underwent primary TKA and were discharged the same day from August 2021 to January 2024. Patients who did not have at least 1 year of follow-up were excluded. Patient demographics, comorbidities, patient-reported outcome measures, emergency department visits, admissions, reoperations, and revisions were collected. Patients were stratified by the location of their surgery: ASC versus hospital. Specific criteria had to be met prior to surgery at the ASC, and the final decision regarding the location of surgery was made via shared decision-making between the patient and their surgeon. Patients who did not meet ASC criteria underwent TKA at the main hospital. Univariable analyses were used to compare groups, and multivariable logistic regression was used to determine if surgical location was a significant factor. Of the 449 TKAs meeting inclusion criteria, 63.3% (284) were performed at the ASC and 36.7% (165) at the university hospital at a mean follow-up of 1.51 years (range, 1.00 to 2.40). Of those 165 whose surgery was done at the hospital, 93.9% met at least one ASC exclusion criteria. RESULTS: Patients whose TKA was done at the hospital had significantly higher weight (P = 0.003), body mass index (P < 0.001), Elixhauser comorbidity index (P < 0.001), proportion of patients who had an American Society of Anesthesiologists classification of 3 (P = 0.023), and proportion of patients who required general anesthesia (P < 0.001). Additionally, patients whose TKA was done at the hospital had higher preoperative patient-reported outcome measurement information system (PROMIS) pain interference (PI) (62.0 [59.0, 66.0] versus 63.0 [61.8, 67.0]; P = 0.006), and lower physical function (PF) (39.0 [36.0, 43.0] versus 38.0 [34.0, 41.0]; P = 0.001). At 1 year, however, patients in both groups had similar PROMIS PI (53.0 [49.0, 59.0] versus 54.0 [44.0, 59.0]; P = 0.785) and PROMIS PF (47.0 [42.0, 51.0] versus 47.0 [41.0, 50.0]; P = 0.422) scores as well as similar rates of achieving minimum clinically important difference for PROMIS PI (64.4 versus 71.4%; P = 0.336) and PROMIS PF (60.5 versus 71.4%; P = 0.124). They also had a similar number of emergency department visits and admissions at 30 and 90 days, as well as similar reoperation-free (92.0 versus 93.3%; P = 0.79) and revision-free (95.5 versus 99.4%; P = 0.59) survival at 2 years CONCLUSIONS: Although ASCs have strict patient criteria for SDD TKA, complex patients at a tertiary university hospital can be sent home the same day with equivalent outcomes. Therefore, unhealthier patients can safely achieve SDD without compromising outcomes if done in the appropriate setting.

Fully ambulatory robotic single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass (SADI): 40 consecutive patients in a single tertiary bariatric center.

BACKGROUND: Single Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal bypass (SADI) is becoming a key option as a revision procedure after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). However, its safety as an ambulatory procedure (length of stay < 12 h) has not been widely described. METHODS: A prospective bariatric study of 40 patients undergoing SADI robotic surgery after LSG with same day discharge (SDD), was undertaken in April 2021. Strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied and the enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery protocol was followed. Anesthesia and robotic procedures were standardized. Early follow-up (30 days) analyzed postoperative (PO) outcomes. RESULTS: Forty patients (37 F/3 M, mean age: 40.3yo), with a mean pre-operative BMI = 40.5 kg/m2 were operated. Median time after LSG was 54 months (21-146). Preoperative comorbidities included: hypertension (n = 3), obstructive sleep apnea (n = 2) and type 2 diabetes (n = 1). Mean total operative time was 128 min (100-180) (mean robotic time: 66 min (42-85)), including patient setup. All patients were discharged home at least 6 h after surgery. There were four minor complications (10%) and two major complications (5%) in the first 30 days postoperative (one intrabdominal abscess PO day-20 (radiological drainage and antibiotic therapy) and one peritonitis due to duodenal leak PO day-1 (treated surgically)). There were six emergency department visits (15%), readmission rate was 5% (n = 2) and reintervention rate was 2.5% (n = 1) There was no mortality and no unplanned overnight hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic SADI can be safe for SDD, with appropriate patient selection, in a high-volume center.

Same-day discharge after laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign/premalignant disease: A multicentre randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether physical function and quality of life was influenced by discharge on the same-day after a total laparoscopic hysterectomy. DESIGN: Multicentre non-inferiority randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Five teaching hospitals and two university hospitals in the Netherlands. POPULATION: Patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign or premalignant disease. METHODS: Following informed consent, participants were allocated 1:1 either to same-day discharge (SDD) or next-day discharge (NDD). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was physical function at 7 days after surgery measured by the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function short Form 10A. Secondary outcomes were physical function and quality of life at 1 and 3 days and 6 weeks after surgery measured with PROMIS short Form 10A and the EuroQol questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). RESULTS: Two hundred and five patients were included of whom 105 were allocated to SDD and 100 to NDD. Physical function 7 days after surgery was 35.95 in the SDD group and 35.63 in the control group (mean difference 0.32; 95% CI [0.07-0.57]). As the upper limit of the 95% CI does not exceed the non-inferiority margin of 4 points, non-inferiority of SDD could be demonstrated. No difference in physical function nor quality of life on Days 1 and 3 and 6 weeks could be found. CONCLUSION: This research demonstrates same-day discharge after laparoscopic hysterectomy is non-inferior to next day discharge in physical function 7 days after surgery.

Complications, Readmissions, and Reoperations in Outpatient vs Inpatient Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Background: Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) has primarily been performed in the inpatient setting. However, with the advent of fast-tracked joint arthroplasty protocols, TAA has slowly been shifting to the outpatient setting. Therefore, this systematic review aims to evaluate outcomes of outpatient TAA and compare them to inpatient TAA. Methods: A literature search was performed on October 23, 2023, in the PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL databases using the PRISMA guidelines. Studies were included if they reported on outcomes of outpatient TAA or compared outcomes between outpatient and inpatient TAA. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences were calculated using a random effects model. Quality assessment was performed using the MINORS criteria. Results: 12 studies were included, with 4 outpatient-only and 8 outpatient-inpatient comparative studies. Patients in the outpatient group were relatively younger, had a lower body mass index, and had fewer comorbidities relative to the inpatient group. For outpatient vs inpatient TAA, the pooled complication rate was 2.6% vs 3.6%, readmission rate was 2.5% vs 4%, and reoperation rate was 3.6% vs 5.5%. We found significantly lower odds of complications (OR = 0.47, CI: 0.26-0.85; P = .01), readmissions (OR = 0.63, CI: 0.54-0.74; P < .00001), and reoperations (OR = 0.66, CI: 0.46-0.95; P = .03) in the outpatient vs inpatient group. Conclusion: Although this analysis is limited by the dominance of data included from a single study, we found that outpatient TAA was generally performed on lower-risk patients and was associated with lower rates of complications, readmissions, and reoperations compared with inpatient TAA.