Transcatheter Aortic Valve-in-Valve Implantation in a Patient Due to the Degeneratation of the Biointegral Valve Conduit as a Result of Previous Infectious Endocarditis.

Graft infection, fistula, and mediastinitis are reported among the serious cardiovascular complications after a Bentall procedure. Surgery associated with antimicrobial treatment is usually recommended but not easily feasible in most cases. In this report, we describe a case of successful valve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in a patient with a degenerated bioconduit from a previously healed infectious endocarditis (IE). The TAVR procedure has been demonstrated to be a therapeutic option in selected cases with a previous history of IE who have been fully treated with antimicrobial therapy and who present a low risk of local re-infection and are deemed at prohibitive or high risk for surgical replacement. Data on TAVR on a bioconduit after a Bentall procedure are scarce. The present case underlines that a long follow-up and individualized treatment could improve the prognosis in patients with a history of prosthetic valve and aortic graft infection and severe valve dysfunction who cannot undergo surgical treatment. The 18F-labeled fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) result could be successfully employed in the decision algorithm. Long-term antibiotic treatment, which could be lifelong in some instances, could be a reasonable choice when the risk of recurrence is associated with the risk for the patient's life.

Assessing post-TAVR cardiac conduction abnormalities risk using an electromechanically coupled beating heart.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has rapidly displaced surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). However, certain post-TAVR complications persist, with cardiac conduction abnormalities (CCA) being one of the major ones. The elevated pressure exerted by the TAVR stent onto the conduction fibers situated between the aortic annulus and the His bundle, in proximity to the atrioventricular (AV) node, may disrupt the cardiac conduction leading to the emergence of CCA. In this study, an in silico framework was developed to assess the CCA risk, incorporating the effect of a dynamic beating heart and preprocedural parameters such as implantation depth and preexisting cardiac asynchrony in the new onset of post-TAVR CCA. A self-expandable TAVR device deployment was simulated inside an electromechanically coupled beating heart model in five patient scenarios, including three implantation depths and two preexisting cardiac asynchronies: (i) a right bundle branch block (RBBB) and (ii) a left bundle branch block (LBBB). Subsequently, several biomechanical parameters were analyzed to assess the post-TAVR CCA risk. The results manifested a lower cumulative contact pressure on the conduction fibers following TAVR for aortic deployment (0.018 MPa) compared to nominal condition (0.29 MPa) and ventricular deployment (0.52 MPa). Notably, the preexisting RBBB demonstrated a higher cumulative contact pressure (0.34 MPa) compared to the nominal condition and preexisting LBBB (0.25 MPa). Deeper implantation and preexisting RBBB cause higher stresses and contact pressure on the conduction fibers leading to an increased risk of post-TAVR CCA. Conversely, implantation above the MS landmark and preexisting LBBB reduces the risk.

Simultaneous Endovascular Aortic Repair Expands Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Eligibility to Patients With Hostile Aortic Pathology.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) has become a primary modality of therapy in moderate-high risk patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Although clinicians remain vigilant about screening for both aortic stenosis, many patients still, nevertheless, often present only when they are symptomatic. Unfortunately, when isolated TAVR is performed in the context of hostile aortic pathology, it has been reported that patients suffer from higher rates of complications such as rupture, dissection, or death post-operatively. OBJECTIVES: To explore the utility of a simultaneous TAVR and endovascular aortic repair in addressing symptomatic aortic stenosis in challenging patients with hostile aortic pathology. METHODS: Retrospective case series within a tertiary care hospital between May 2017 and December 2023. RESULTS: A total of 11 patients underwent simultaneous endovascular aortic repair and TAVR. TAVR was performed first in 9/11 (82%) of the procedures while endovascular aortic repair was performed first in 2/11 procedures (18%). The median age was 84 years old (IQR = 77-86 years old). The median LOS was 3 days (IQR = 2-10 days). The median procedure time was 155 minutes (IQR = 111-202 minutes) and the median contrast amount was 100 CC (IQR = 65-139 CC). 2 patients (18%) experienced post-operative complications. Both of these patients required re-intervention. This cohort of patients did not experience any mortality at 30 days related to pertinent complications or adverse MACE events. All patients were transferred to the PACU and ultimately discharged home. CONCLUSIONS: Extending TAVR eligibility to high-risk patients with hostile aortic pathology through the implementation of simultaneous endovascular aortic repair, performed via the same access site, is an effective strategy for management of symptomatic aortic stenosis in the context of extensive cardiovascular co-morbidities.

Using novel machine learning tools to predict optimal discharge following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: Although transcatheter aortic valve replacement has emerged as an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement, it requires extensive healthcare resources, and optimal length of hospital stay has become increasingly important. This study was conducted to assess the potential of novel machine learning models (artificial neural network and eXtreme Gradient Boost) in predicting optimal hospital discharge following transcatheter aortic valve replacement. AIM: To determine whether artificial neural network and eXtreme Gradient Boost models can be used to accurately predict optimal discharge following transcatheter aortic valve replacement. METHODS: Data were collected from the 2016-2018 National Inpatient Sample database using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on length of hospital stay: optimal discharge (length of hospital stay 0-3 days); and late discharge (length of hospital stay 4-9 days). χ2 and t tests were performed to compare patient characteristics with optimal discharge and prolonged discharge. Logistic regression, artificial neural network and eXtreme Gradient Boost models were used to predict optimal discharge. Model performance was determined using area under the curve and F1 score. An area under the curve≥0.80 and an F1 score≥0.70 were considered strong predictive accuracy. RESULTS: Twenty-five thousand and eight hundred and seventy-four patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement were analysed. Predictability of optimal discharge was similar amongst the models (area under the curve 0.80 in all models). In all models, patient disposition and elective procedure were the most important predictive factors. Coagulation disorder was the strongest co-morbidity predictor of whether a patient had an optimal discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Artificial neural network and eXtreme Gradient Boost models had satisfactory performances, demonstrating similar accuracy to binary logistic regression in predicting optimal discharge following transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Further validation and refinement of these models may lead to broader clinical adoption.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement and the value of increasing treatment for severe symptomatic aortic stenosis: a plain language summary.

What is this summary about?This article summarizes an economic evaluation of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), a treatment for severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (SSAS). SSAS occurs when the aortic valve, which allows blood to leave the heart, becomes very narrow. This reduces blood flow to the body, causing symptoms like tiredness, chest pain, dizziness, or fainting. Treating SSAS requires replacing the valve. Untreated SSAS results in heart failure and death.Before TAVR, SSAS patients had two options, medical management and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Medical management helps with symptoms but does not replace the valve, leading patients to eventually die from SSAS. SAVR replaces the valve through open-heart surgery, which is invasive, involving making a large cut through the chest bone. Concerns about this invasiveness led many patients to avoid SAVR, leaving their SSAS untreated. TAVR was introduced in 2010. It is less invasive than SAVR, involving inserting a new valve through a small cut in the leg. TAVR has become popular and twice as many patients now undergo TAVR compared to SAVR.We measure TAVR's net benefits as the value of its health benefits minus its healthcare costs. We measure these net benefits in three patient groups aged 65 and above in the United States. Group 1 patients are ineligible for SAVR, so TAVR is their only treatment option. Group 2 patients would have received SAVR if TAVR were not available. Group 3 patients are eligible for SAVR but concerned about its invasiveness, and so would have stayed untreated without TAVR.[Box: see text]What were the key takeaways?Net benefits per patient are significant in all groups, roughly equal in groups 1 and 2, and over six times larger in group 3. When net benefits are added up across patients, group 3's total net benefit is 30 times larger than that of groups 1 and 2 combined.What are the main conclusions?Past studies ignored TAVR's value in helping treat patients who might go untreated because of concerns over SAVR's invasiveness. But this is TAVR's largest value to SSAS patients. Our findings support continuing and increasing access to TAVR among SSAS patients, especially those who may go untreated because of concerns about invasive treatment.[Box: see text][Box: see text]Link to original article here.

Feasibility and Safety of Post-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Coronary Revascularization Guided by Stress Cardiac Imaging.

Background: Systematic revascularization of asymptomatic coronary artery stenosis before transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is controversial. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of functional evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD) followed by selective ischemia-guided percutaneous coronary revascularization following TAVR. Methods: This prospective, bi-centric, single-arm, open-label trial included all patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) eligible for TAVR and with significant CAD defined as ≥1 coronary stenosis ≥ 70%. Patients with left main stenosis ≥ 50%, proximal left anterior descending artery (LAD) stenosis ≥ 90% or > class 2 Canadian Classification Society (CCS) angina were excluded. Myocardial ischemia was evaluated by stress cardiac imaging one month after TAVR. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, stroke, major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consotium ≥ 3), major vascular complication (Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 criteria), acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and hospitalization for cardiac causes within 6 months of receiving TAVR. Results: Between June 2020 and June 2022, 64 patients were included in this study. The mean age was 84 ± 5.2 years. CAD mostly involved LAD (n = 27, 42%) with frequent multivessel disease (n = 30, 47%) and calcified lesions (n = 39, 61%). Stress cardiac imaging could be achieved in 70% (n = 46) of the patients, while 30% (n = 18) did not attend the stress test. Significant myocardial ischemia was observed in only three patients (4.5%). At 6-month follow-up, fifteen patients (23%) reached the primary endpoint, including death in six patients (9%), stroke in three patients (5%) and major bleeding in three patients (5%). ACS was observed in only two patients (3%) but both had severe coronary stenosis (≥90%) and did not refer for stress imaging for personal reasons. Hospital readmission (n = 27, 41%) was mostly related to non-cardiac causes (n = 17, 27%). Conclusions: In patients with asymptomatic CAD scheduled to undergo TAVR, a selective ischemia-guided coronary revascularization after TAVR seems to be safe, with a very low rate of ACS and few cases of myocardial ischemia requiring revascularization, despite low adherence to medical follow-up in this elderly population. This strategy could be evaluated in a randomized study.

Prospective study on the impact of different anti-thrombotic therapies on subclinical leaflet thickening and its temporal dynamics in transcatheter aortic valves - The NOTION-4 trial: Anti-thrombotic therapy and TAV-HALT.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become the standard-of-care treatment for a majority of patients with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis. The post-procedural anti-thrombotic therapeutic management is still a topic of debate and could affect the incidence of HALT, a phenomenon which can be assessed by four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT). TRIAL DESIGN: The NOTION-4 trial is a randomized controlled trial comprising TAVR patients with no indication for oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy, comparing lifelong single anti-platelet therapy (standard arm) versus early 3-month direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) therapy followed by single anti-plateletet therapy (experimental arm). The incidence of HALT and clinical endpoints will be evaluated in both groups at 3 months, 1 year and 5 years after randomization. The primary endpoint is the number of patients with at least one bioprosthetic aortic valve leaflet with HALT as assessed by cardiac 4DCT imaging at 1 year. The trial is powered for superiority testing and started enrollment in 2021. In total, 324 patients will be included. The last patient is expected to be enrolled by the end of 2024 and the primary endpoint is to be presented in 2026. CONCLUSION AND PERSPECTIVE: The NOTION-4 trial aims to study whether an early 3-month DOAC therapy after TAVR can result in a sustained lower incidence of HALT in transcatheter aortic valves. This trial holds the potential to give valuable insights into whether early OAC therapy should be integrated in future guidelines for post-TAVR anti-thrombotic therapeutic management. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NOTION-4, ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT06449469, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06449469.

Global Cost-Effectiveness of Transcatheter vs. Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUD: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a less invasive treatment option for patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS); however, its economic benefits in patients with low to intermediate surgical risk remain controversial and vary by country. We conducted a systematic review to compare the economic benefits of TAVR versus surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). METHODS: We searched six databases, including PubMed, Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Clinical Trials for randomized controlled trials on the economic benefits of TAVR with different valve types and SAVR in symptomatic AS patients with low to intermediate surgical risk, from inception to October 2023. We extracted data on quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), with ICER converted to 2023 United States dollars (USD) exchange rates. RESULTS: Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria, with the overall quality ranging from intermediate to high. Among these, TAVR was found to be cost-effective in 14 studies, while in one study conducted in a developing country, TAVR was not cost-effective. When adjusted to 2023 USD, the ICER values ranged from $3,669 to $340,038 per QALY gained. CONCLUSION: TAVR appears to be a cost-effective alternative to SAVR in patients with low to intermediate AS. In all studies, TAVR was associated with a significant increase in QALYs compared to SAVR. As it is an expensive procedure, the cost-effectiveness of TAVR depends on each country's ICER and willingness-to-pay threshold.

Institutional Variation in Patient Radiation Doses During Transcatheter Valve Interventions: A Statewide Experience.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about institutional radiation doses during transcatheter valve interventions. OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to evaluate institutional variability in radiation doses during transcatheter valve interventions. METHODS: Using a large statewide registry, transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair, transcatheter mitral valve replacement, and transcatheter aortic valve replacement procedures between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2022, with an air kerma (AK) recorded were analyzed. Patient and procedural characteristics were compared between cases with AK ≥2 and <2 Gy. Associations of variables with AK ≥2 Gy were investigated using Bayesian random effects modeling and median ORs for the performing hospital. RESULTS: Among 9,446 procedures across 30 hospitals, median (Q1-Q3) procedural AK was 0.592 Gy (0.348-0.989 Gy) with AK ≥2 Gy in 533 cases (5.6%). Wide variation in procedural AK was observed, with an institutional frequency of AK ≥2 Gy ranging from 0.0% to 29.5%. Bayesian modeling identified the performing hospital as more strongly associated with the odds of a procedural AK ≥2 Gy than any patient or procedural factors (hospital median OR: 3.54 [95% credible interval: 2.52-16.66]). CONCLUSIONS: In a large, multicenter state-wide registry, there is wide institutional variability in patient-level radiation doses during transcatheter valve interventions, with the performing hospital having a higher odds of an AK ≥2 Gy than any patient or procedural factors. Future interventions are warranted to reduce procedural-related variation in radiation exposure.

Immediate change following valve deployment in left ventricular systolic and diastolic functions in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a retrospective cohort study.

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an effective treatment for aortic valve disorder. Several studies have reported improvements in systolic and diastolic function following TAVR. However, few studies have addressed immediate post-deployment changes. Therefore, this study examines left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic function changes immediately after valve deployment in TAVR patients, distinguishing between those with normal and impaired LV ejection fraction (LVEF). Methods: In this single-center retrospective cohort study, intraoperative changes in LV systolic and diastolic function were analyzed in patients undergoing TAVR from January 2012 to September 2014. Participants were categorized into two groups based on preprocedural LVEF: the low ejection fraction (EF) group (LVEF <50%) and the normal EF group (LVEF ≥50%). LVEF, as an indicator of LV systolic function, along with lateral e' and the E/e' ratio as indicators of LV diastolic function before and immediately after valve deployment were compared in the overall cohort and within each group. Results: Forty-eight TAVR cases were included, comprising 15 in the low EF group and 33 in the normal EF group. Overall, there was a significant improvement in LVEF {51.7% [standard deviation (SD)] 15.0 vs. 58.0% (SD 11.6), P=0.007}, with no significant changes in e' or E/e'. In the low EF group, a significant increase was observed in LVEF [31.8% (SD 8.0) vs. 45.5% (SD 9.9), P=0.006], e' [5.0 cm/s (SD 1.4) vs. 6.2 cm/s (SD 1.0), P=0.004], and a significant decrease was observed in E/e' [22.3 (SD 7.6) vs. 16.1 (SD 3.4), P=0.01]. The normal EF group showed a significant decrease in e' [6.2 cm/s (SD 1.8) vs. 5.9 cm/s (SD 1.6), P=0.04] without significant changes in LVEF and E/e'. Conclusions: This study revealed significant intraoperative improvements in systolic and diastolic functions immediately after valve deployment in TAVR patients with low preprocedural LVEF. These immediate improvements were not observed in patients with normal LVEF.

Sex-related disparities in aortic stenosis from disease awareness to treatment: a state-of-the-art review.

This state-of-the-art review aimed to synthesize evidence from various sex-stratified studies on aortic stenosis (AS), focusing on the difference in clinical presentation, anatomical characteristics, pathophysiology, and management of AS. In comparison to men, women with AS are present at later stages, are older, more symptomatic, frailer, and exhibit higher operative risk [Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score]. Women tend to have smaller aortic valve (AV) areas and left ventricular (LV) outflow tract, leading to lower stroke volumes (SVs) than men and have a higher prevalence of paradoxical, low-flow, low-gradient AS. In women, chronic pressure overload due to AS results in concentric LV remodelling and hypertrophy, characterized by reduced LV cavities, higher filling pressures, lower wall stress, and more diastolic dysfunction. Conversely, men exhibit more dilated eccentric LV remodelling and hypertrophy. AVs in women are less calcified but more fibrotic. Moreover, women are often underdiagnosed, have severity underestimated, and experience delays or receive fewer referrals for AV replacement (AVR). However, women tend to benefit from transcatheter AVR (TAVR) with a long-term survival advantage over men, although the incidence of vascular complications and bleeding events in 30 days after TAVR is higher in women. Surgical AVR (SAVR) in women has high operative risk, is technically demanding and has poorer outcomes with increased mortality at 30 days compared to men. According to the STS score and EuroSCORE, the female sex itself is considered a risk factor for SAVR. Therefore, addressing sex-related disparities in AS and increasing awareness among physicians promises improved diagnosis and treatment, facilitating equitable care and the development of sex-specific personalized medicine.

Pacemaker Implantation for Low-Grade Conduction Abnormalities After Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

INTRODUCTION: A frequent complication after TAVI are postinterventional conduction abnormalities requiring permanent pacemaker implantation. In this study, we analyzed the characteristics of borderline conduction abnormalities leading to pacemaker implantation and the resulting ventricular pacing amounts. METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients who underwent balloon-expandable TAVI between 2014 and 2019 in our tertiary center were analyzed in a retrospective manner. One hundred and sixty-five patients of 1083 TAVI-patients developed postinterventional conduction abnormalities leading to pacemaker implantation. Of these 19 (11.5%) did not represent a clear indication for cardiac pacing according to current European guidelines. Patient characteristics, underlying conduction abnormalities, and the temporal change of ventricular pacing percentages at 24 h and 6 weeks after pacemaker implantation were analyzed. The dominating borderline conduction abnormalities leading to pacemaker implantation were new-onset persisting bundle-branch-blocks and new first-degree AV-blocks with progression of AV-delay. While pacemaker implantation was safe and without severe complications in all cases, only 6 of 19 patients had high pacing amounts (95%-100%) after 24 h while 11 patients had low to no pacing amounts (0%-5%). After 6 weeks, 8 patients showed decreasing pacing amounts, no patient had an increasing amount of ventricular pacing and all patients had an intrinsic ventricular rhythm > 30/min. CONCLUSION: In our cohort of 1038 TAVI patients, 19 patients underwent PMI for borderline CAs (11.5% of all PMI). Of these, only 2 patients had high pacing amounts after 6 weeks. The risk of complete persisting heart block in these patients is very low. Furthermore, algorithms to reduce ventricular pacing are highly effective to avoid ventricular pacing whenever reasonable.

Impactful Cardiac CT and MRI Articles from 2023.

Cardiac imaging is important in diagnosing, treating, and predicting prognosis in patients with cardiovascular disease. Imaging protocols and analysis are consistently evolving, and the implementation of artificial intelligence-based applications is of increasing interest. This review presents recent advancements in noninvasive cardiac imaging, specifically focusing on cardiac CT and MRI, from notable publications across multidisciplinary journals in 2023 of interest to both radiologists and referring clinicians in the field. The discussion encompasses the latest trials of CT fractional flow reserve and the performance of the newest generation of photon-counting detector CT, particularly in coronary stenosis quantification. Additionally, it addresses coronary plaque quantification using artificial intelligence applications and their implications from large patient cohorts, alongside prognostic outcomes, and the value of coronary artery calcification scores. Various aspects of CT trials, such as anatomic planning before revascularization, high-risk plaque features, outcomes, and pericoronary fat index, are evaluated. New insights from cardiac MRI trials for cardiomyopathies, including cardiac amyloidosis, dilated cardiomyopathy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, myocarditis, and valvular disease, are also outlined. The review concludes by highlighting impactful societal statements and guidelines. Keywords: CT Angiography, MR Imaging, Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation/Replacement (TAVI/TAVR), Cardiac, Coronary Arteries, Heart, Left Ventricle © RSNA, 2024.

Conservative approach of ascending aortic dissection after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A case report.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has shown good early and midterm results from high risk to low surgical risk patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis. Despite low adverse events, TAVR is associated with vascular injury, bleeding, stroke, and conduction system disturbances as the most common adverse events. Aortic dissection is a relatively rare but potentially lethal complication from TAVR. Here, we report a case of ascending aortic dissection (type A) complicating TAVR that was managed conservatively with complete resolution of the complication noted on serial computed tomography angiogram.

Unmasking Rheumatic Heart Disease Decades Later in a Patient With a Remote History of Rheumatic Fever Despite Prolonged Antibiotic Prophylaxis.

Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) is one of the leading causes of valvular heart disease worldwide and still persists in the USA, particularly among vulnerable populations with limited healthcare. Depending on the risk, severity, and types of valve involvement, treatment includes guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) and surgical interventions like valve repair or replacement. Here, we present a unique case of a patient in his late fifties who presented with worsening heart failure symptoms and several heart murmurs. A transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) revealed moderate to severe mitral regurgitation (MR), aortic regurgitation (AR), and mild aortic stenosis (AS) with a bicuspid aortic valve. However, coronary angiography and right heart catheterization showed no blockages, right ventricular dysfunction, or pulmonary hypertension. Furthermore, no valvular vegetation was noticed on the transesophageal echocardiogram. The patient had a history of acute rheumatic fever (RF) in adolescence and was treated until age 21. Despite potential alternative causes like myocardial infarction or endocarditis, the lack of ischemic findings, negative blood cultures, and absence of valvular vegetation suggested that RHD was the possible cause of his valvular issues. This case highlights the rare occurrence of RHD impacting multiple valves despite proper antibiotic prophylaxis and draws attention to the importance of considering RHD when diagnosing multiple valvular problems, as many patients are identified too late for surgical intervention.