Efficacy and safety of abatacept in preclinical rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: Abatacept is a biological DMARD that has been used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. However, the literature on its use in preclinical Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is limited. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of abatacept in preclinical RA. STUDY DESIGN: This meta-analysis intends to assess the effectiveness and safety of abatacept in persons who are at a high risk of developing rheumatoid arthritis (RA) during the pre-clinical phase. The analysis comprises of three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving atotal of 367 participants. The study follows the procedures specified in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and the PRISMA statemen RESULTS: The meta-analysis found that abatacept significantly reduced the risk of developing RA compared to placebo (RR: 0.67; 95 % CI: 0.51 to 0.89; P = 0.006) and improved tender joint count (SMD: -0.40; 95 % CI: -0.63 to -0.18; P = 0.0004). Additionally, abatacept demonstrated a significant reduction in functional disability (SMD: -1.51; 95 % CI: -1.91 to -1.11; P < 0.00001), though no significant difference was observed in pain reduction. Safety analysis revealed no significant differences in the occurrence of infections, malignancy, or discontinuation due to adverse events between the abatacept and placebo groups. CONCLUSION: Abatacept is a promising treatment option for slowing down the development of RA in people who are at high risk. It has a positive safety profile. Additional studies with extended follow-up periods are required to validate these findings and offer more substantial data.

Context-restricted PD-(L)1 checkpoint agonism by CTLA4-Ig therapies inhibits T cell activity.

T cell surface CTLA4 sequesters the costimulatory ligands CD80 and CD86 on antigen-presenting cells (APCs) to prevent autoimmunity. Therapeutic immunosuppression by recombinant CTLA4-immunoglobulin (Ig) fusion proteins, including abatacept, is also attributed to CD80/CD86 blockade. Recent studies show that CTLA4-Ig binding to APC surface cis-CD80:PD-L1 complexes can release the inhibitory ligand PD-L1, but whether this contributes to T cell inhibition remains unclear. Here, we show that PD-L1 liberation by CTLA4-Ig is strictly limited, both in extent and context, relative to PD-L1-competing anti-CD80 antibodies. At APC surface CD80:PD-L1 ratios exceeding 2:1, CTLA4-Ig therapies fail to release PD-L1 regardless of their CD80 affinity. Additionally, introducing flexibility into CTLA4-Ig by modifying its rigid homodimer interface produces biologics that retain bivalent CD80 binding without dissociating cis-bound PD-L1. These findings demonstrate that CTLA4-Ig therapies liberate PD-L1 through a CD80 reorientation mechanism that imposes a strict context dependence to their PD-1 checkpoint agonism and resultant T cell inhibition.

The Therapeutic Efficacy of Abatacept for Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: Insights from a 12-Month Trial Using Semi-Quantitative Chest High-Resolution Computed Tomography Imaging.

Background: Rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) is a major complication of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but effective treatment remains an unmet need in its management. Our aim was to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of abatacept for RA-ILD. Methods: This observational retrospective study included patients with RA-ILD treated with abatacept between 2012 and 2021. Indices of RA disease activity and interstitial lung disease (Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using C-reactive Protein [DAS28-CRP], Simplified Disease Activity Index [SDAI], Clinical Disease Activity Index [CDAI], serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 levels, % forced vital capacity [%FVC], and semi-quantified chest high-resolution computed tomography scores) were evaluated before and 1 year after the start of abatacept administration. Results: Overall, 38 patients were included. DAS28-CRP, SDAI, and CDAI were significantly improved (all with p < 0.0001). Total ground-glass opacity scores were decreased in both patients with usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP)-like patterns and with non-UIP-like patterns (p = 0.008 and <0.002, respectively). Total fibrosis scores were also decreased in the UIP-like pattern group (p < 0.042). The %FVC remained stable. Conclusions: Abatacept significantly improves RA disease activity and reduces pulmonary inflammation in patients with RA-ILD.

The first five years of SARS-CoV-2: inpatient treatment updates and future directions.

INTRODUCTION: In December 2019, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was first identified in adults with pneumonia in Wuhan, China. AREAS COVERED: It is now believed that several billion humans have been infected with SARS-CoV-2 and more than ten million have died from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the disease caused by SARS-CoV-2. EXPERT OPINION: The first five years of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic have been marked by unfathomable suffering as well as remarkable scientific progress. This manuscript examines what has been learned about the treatment of inpatients with COVID-19 and explores how the therapeutic approach may evolve in the years ahead.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for CTLA-4 insufficiency across Europe: A European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Inborn Errors Working Party study.

BACKGROUND: Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) insufficiency causes a primary immune regulatory disorder characterized by lymphoproliferation, dysgammaglobulinemia, and multiorgan autoimmunity including cytopenias and colitis. OBJECTIVE: We examined the outcome of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for CTLA-4 insufficiency and study the impact of pre-HSCT CTLA-4 fusion protein (CTLA-4-Ig) therapy and pre-HSCT immune dysregulation on survival and immunologic outcome. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of HSCT for CTLA-4 insufficiency and 2q33.2-3 deletion from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Inborn Errors Working Party. Primary end points were overall survival (OS) and disease- and chronic graft-versus-host disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary end point was immunologic outcome assessed by immune dysregulation disease activity (IDDA) score. RESULTS: Forty patients were included over a 25-year period. Before HSCT, 60% received CTLA-4-Ig, and median (range) IDDA score was 23.3 (3.9-84.0). Median (range) age at HSCT was 14.2 (1.3-56.0) years. Patients received peripheral blood stem cell (58%) or marrow (43%) from a matched unrelated donor (75%), mismatched unrelated donor (12.5%), or matched family donor (12.5%). Median (range) follow-up was 3 (0.6-15) years, and 3-year OS was 76.7% (58-87%) and DFS was 74.4% (54.9-86.0%). At latest follow-up, disease of 28 of 30 surviving patients was in disease-free remission with median IDDA reduction of 16. Probability of OS and DFS was greater in patients with lower disease activity before HSCT (IDDA < 23, P = .002 and P = .006, respectively). CTLA-4-Ig receipt did not influence OS or DFS. Cause of death was transplant related in 7 of 8 patients. CONCLUSION: HSCT is an effective therapy to prevent ongoing disease progression and morbidity, with improving survival rates over time and in patients with lower pre-HSCT disease activity.

Effect of abatacept versus conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs on rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To compare the effects of abatacept and conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) on the progression and development of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD). METHODS: This multi-center retrospective study included RA patients receiving abatacept or csDMARDs who underwent at least two pulmonary function tests and/or chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). We compared the following outcomes between the groups: progression of RA-ILD, development of new ILD in RA patients without ILD at baseline, 28-joint Disease Activity Score with the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR), and safety. Longitudinal changes were compared between the groups by using a generalized estimating equation. RESULTS: The study included 123 patients who were treated with abatacept (n = 59) or csDMARDs (n = 64). Nineteen (32.2%) and 38 (59.4%) patients treated with abatacept and csDMARDs, respectively, presented with RA-ILD at baseline. Newly developed ILD occurred in one patient receiving triple csDMARDs for 32 months. Among patients with RA-ILD at baseline, ILD progressed in 21.1% of cases treated with abatacept and 34.2% of cases treated with csDMARDs during a median 21-month follow-up. Longitudinal changes in forced vital capacity and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide were comparable between the two groups. However, the abatacept group showed a more significant decrease in DAS28-ESR and glucocorticoid doses than csDMARDs group during the follow-up. The safety of both regimens was comparable. CONCLUSION: Abatacept and csDMARDs showed comparable effects on the development and stabilization of RA-ILD. Nevertheless, compared to csDMARDs, abatacept demonstrated a significant improvement in disease activity and led to reduced glucocorticoid use.

Multi-omics analysis to reveal the synergistic mechanism underlying the multiple ingredients of Stephania tetrandra extract on rheumatoid arthritis through the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway.

Background: Stephania tetrandra has been used for treating rheumatic diseases for thousands of years in rural areas of China. Several studies have found that tetrandrine and fangchinoline can inactivate the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway by reducing the expression and phosphorylation of AKT. However, the mechanism underlying the therapeutic actions of S. tetrandra on RA is not well known. Methods: In this study, we determined the molecular mechanism of the therapeutic effects of the multiple ingredients of S. tetrandra extract (STE) on collagen-induced arthritic (CIA) rats by integrating pharmacometabolomics, proteomics, and PTMomics. Results: In the multi-omics joint analysis, first, the expression signatures of proteins, PTMs, metabolites, and STE ingredients were profiled in CIA rats PBMCs that underwent STE treatment. Bioinformatics analysis were subsequently probed that STE mainly regulated tryptophan metabolism, inflammatory response, and cell adhesion pathways in CIA rats. The interrelated pathways were further constructed, and the findings revealed that STE attenuated the inflammatory response and proliferation of PBMCs in CIA rats by mediating the key targets of the PI3K/Akt pathway, including Hint1, ACP1, FGR, HSP90@157W + dioxidation, and Prkca@220N + 845.4540 Da. The rheumatic functions of Hint1 and ACP1 were further confirmed by applying a transcriptomic data of RA patients who clinically received abatacept therapy. Furthermore, a cross-ome correlation analysis was performed and major in vivo ingredients of STE, including coclaurine-N-glucuronide, Me,coclaurine-O-glc, N-gluA-schefferine, corydamine, corypamine, tetrandrine, and fangchiniline, were found to act on these targerts to inactivate the PI3K/Akt pathway. Conclusion: These results elucidated the molecular mechanism by which the ingredients of STE mediate the expression of the key targets in the PI3K/Akt pathway, leading to anti-rheumatic functions. The findings of this study provided new insights into the synergistic effect of STE against arthritis in rats.

From pre-clinical efficacy to promising clinical trials that delay Type 1 diabetes.

Recent advancements in immunology and islet biology have unveiled remarkable prospects for the postponement of Type 1 diabetes (T1D) through the strategic modulation of the immune system. In this Perspective, we discuss the pharmaceutical strides achieved, traversing from pre-clinical validation to the execution of impactful clinical trials. We begin with the initial investigations involving cyclosporine and glucocorticoids in rodent models, such as the non-obese diabetic (NOD) mouse, which guided early clinical trials. We then discuss the pre-clinical studies using suitable mouse models that eventually led to contemporary clinical trials targeting immune cell functionality and cytokine signaling pathways. Collectively, these discoveries promote the exciting paradigm of immune system modulation to mitigate autoimmunity, which continues to broaden. Notably, the use of baricitinib, a potent JAK1/2 inhibitor, and teplizumab, an anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody, represent discrete methodologies converging upon a singular outcome: the preservation of islet beta-cell functionality. The latter interventional strategies build on the original idea that tempering specific facets of the immune system will generate therapeutic benefit. Enthusiasm from these discoveries stems from efficacy with reduced side effects when compared with past approaches. The success of therapeutic intervention(s) in pre-clinical studies, combined with knowledge about stages of progression to clinical T1D, have ultimately encouraged the design of more successful clinical trials targeting highly specific populations at risk. Collectively, these findings instill a profound sense of optimism, suggesting that the prevention and even reversal of T1D may soon be within reach.

Abatacept versus tumor necrosis factor inhibitors on mortality and medical utilizations in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis associated interstitial lung disease: a large-scale real-world retrospective cohort study.

Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic inflammatory disease, and interstitial lung disease is one of the important extra-articular manifestations. There is limited evidence comparing abatacept (ABA) and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) regarding the risk of mortality among patients with rheumatoid arthritis associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD). The aim of this study is to investigate the risk of mortality in patients with RA-ILD treated with ABA compared to TNFi. This retrospective cohort study utilized TriNetX electronic health record database. We enrolled patients who were diagnosed with RA-ILD and had received a new prescription for either ABA or TNFi. Patients were categorized into two cohorts based on their initial prescription. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and secondary outcomes were healthcare utilizations, including hospitalization, critical care services, and mechanical ventilation. Subgroup analyses were performed on age, presence of anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPA), and cardiovascular risk. Among 34,388 RA-ILD patients, 895 were selected for each group (ABA and TNFi) following propensity score matching. The ABA group exhibited a higher all-cause mortality risk. (HR 1.296, 95% CI 1.006-1.671). Subgroup analysis showed a heightened risk of receiving mechanical ventilation in ABA-treated patients aged 18-64 years old (HR 1.853, 95% CI 1.002-3.426), and those with cardiovascular risk factors (HR 2.015, 95% CI 1.118-3.630). Another subgroup analysis indicated a higher risk of mortality among ABA-treated patients with positive-ACPA. (HR 4.138 95% CI 1.343-12.75). This real-world data research demonstrated a higher risk of all-cause mortality in RA-ILD patients treated with ABA compared to TNFi, particularly those aged 18-64 years, lacking cardiovascular risk factors, and positive-ACPA. ABA was associated with an increased risk of mechanical ventilation in patients aged 18-64 years and those with cardiovascular risk factors.

Impact of concomitant methotrexate on disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis tapering abatacept: results from KOBIO registry.

Objectives: Tapering biologic agents can be considered for patients with stable disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, the specific strategy for abatacept is uncertain. This study aimed to examine the impact of tapering abatacept on disease activity in RA patients and assess the potential influence of concomitant methotrexate (MTX) treatment. Methods: Using data from the KOBIO registry, we included 505 1 year intervals from 176 patients with RA that initiated abatacept with concomitant MTX at baseline. The intervals were divided into two groups based on the dose quotient (DQ) of abatacept during each period (i.e., the tapering group (DQ < 1) and control group (DQ = 1)). The primary outcome was achieving DAS28-remission at 1 year intervals. Marginal structural models (MSM) were used to minimize confounding caused by an imbalance in time-varying variables. Results: Abatacept was tapered at 146 (28.9%) intervals, and the mean DQ was 0.68. DAS28-remission was achieved in 207 (41.8%) intervals. Tapering abatacept did not affect the odds of achieving DAS28-remission compared with the control group (OR 1.04 [0.67-1.62]). The odds remained unaffected in the subgroup that continued MTX (OR 1.42 [0.88-2.30]) but not in the subgroup that discontinued MTX (OR 0.26 [0.10-0.57]). The effects of interaction between tapering abatacept and concomitant MTX use on DAS28 and patient's functional status showed consistent results. The incidence of adverse events within a 1 year interval was comparable between the two groups. Conclusion: Withdrawal of MTX while tapering abatacept may compromise meeting the treatment goal for patients with RA.

Safety and Efficacy of Upadacitinib in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Refractory to Biologic DMARDs: Results Through Week 216 from the SELECT-CHOICE Study.

INTRODUCTION: The safety and efficacy of upadacitinib 15 mg (UPA15) through week 216 was evaluated in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from the long-term extension (LTE) of the phase 3 SELECT-CHOICE study. METHODS: Patients with RA refractory to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) were randomized to UPA15 or abatacept (ABA) for 24 weeks. During the open-label LTE, patients on ABA switched to UPA15 at week 24, and those on UPA15 continued treatment. The safety and efficacy of continuous UPA15, and ABA to UPA15, are summarized through week 216. RESULTS: The LTE was comprised of 91.4% (n = 277/303) of patients that initially received UPA15, and 89.6% (n = 277/309) that initially received ABA. Of patients on UPA15 in the LTE (n = 547), 28.3% (n = 155/547) discontinued the study drug by week 216. Relative to other adverse events of special interest, and largely consistent with previous findings at week 24, higher rates of serious infection, COVID-19, herpes zoster, and elevated creatine phosphokinase were reported, while rates of malignancy excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC), NMSC, major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), and venous thromboembolism (VTE) were low. Long-term safety data with UPA through week 216 aligned with previous observations and no new safety risks were identified, including in patients who switched from ABA to UPA15. Proportions of patients achieving 28-joint disease activity score based on C-reactive protein (DAS28[CRP]) < 2.6/ ≤ 3.2, clinical disease activity index (CDAI) and simple disease activity index (SDAI) low disease activity/remission, ≥ 20%/50%/70% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology (ACR20/50/70) response criteria, and Boolean remission were maintained or improved with UPA15 through week 216. Improvements in the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), patient's assessment of pain, and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) were also maintained or improved with UPA15 through week 216. Across all efficacy endpoints, similar results were observed in patients who switched from ABA to UPA15 versus continuous UPA15. Patients with an inadequate response to ≥ 1 prior tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor (UPA15: n = 263/303, 86.8%; ABA to UPA15: n = 273/309, 88.3%) showed similar responses to the total population. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term safety profile of UPA was consistent with previous findings and the broader RA clinical program. Compared to the primary analyses at week 24, efficacy responses were maintained or further improved with UPA15 through week 216 in patients with RA. Trial registration, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03086343.

A long-term study looked at a drug named upadacitinib to treat people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a disease that causes joint pain and damage. The study included patients whose RA was not improved by other injectable medicines. The study compared upadacitinib with another drug called abatacept. After 24 weeks, patients who were taking abatacept switched to upadacitinib, and patients taking upadacitinib continued on upadacitinib treatment for over 4 years. The researchers looked at how well the treatments worked over the long-term and if there were any side effects. The side effects with upadacitinib treatment in this long-term study were similar to side effects reported in previous studies with upadacitinib. The researchers also found that upadacitinib helped to lessen the symptoms of RA over time and helped patients complete their daily activities and reduced their pain and tiredness. This was true for patients who switched from abatacept to upadacitinib after 24 weeks and for patients who took upadacitinib from the start of the study. Patients who had not responded to other medicines also had similar improvements with upadacitinib. In conclusion, upadacitinib can help people with RA over the long term and no new safety risks were found.

To switch or to swap? Evidence from a meta-analysis for the best treatment approach in childhood chronic uveitis resistant to the I anti-TNF.

Objective: Since adalimumab approval in childhood chronic non-infectious uveitis (cNIU), the prognosis has been dramatically changed, but the 25 % failed to achieve inactivity. There is not accordance if it is better to switch to another anti-TNF or to swap to another category of biologic. Thus, we aim to summarize evidence regarding the best treatment of cNIU refractory to the first anti-TNF. Methods: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis, according to PRISMA Guidelines, was performed(Jan2000-Aug2023). Studies investigating the efficacy of treatment in cNIU refractory to the first anti-TNF were considered for inclusion. The primary outcome was the improvement of intraocular inflammation according to SUN. A combined estimation of the proportion of children responding to switch or swap and for each drug was performed. Results: 23 articles were eligible, reporting 150 children of whom 109 switched anti-TNF (45 adalimumab, 49 infliximab, 9 golimumab) and 41 swapped to another biologics (31 abatacept, 8 tocilizumab and 1 rituximab). The proportion of responding children was 46 %(95 % CI 23-70) for switch and 38 %(95 % CI 8-73) for swap (χ20.02, p = 0.86). Instead analysing for each drug, the proportion of responding children was the 24 %(95 % CI 2-55) for adalimumab, 43 %(95 % CI 2-80) for abatacept, 79 %(95 % CI 61-93) for infliximab, 56 %(95 % CI 14-95) for golimumab and 96 %(95 % CI 58-100) for tocilizumab. We evaluated a superiority of tocilizumab and infliximab compared to the other drugs(χ2 27.5 p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Although non-conclusive, this meta-analysis suggests that, after the first anti-TNF failure, tocilizumab and infliximab are the best available treatment for the management of cNIU.

Association of rheumatoid factor, anti-citrullinated protein antibodies and shared epitope with clinical response to initial treatment in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: data from a randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether rheumatoid factor (RF), anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) and shared epitope (SE) allele-related genetic markers associate with treatment response to abatacept, certolizumab pegol or tocilizumab versus active conventional treatment (ACT). METHODS: Patients with treatment-naïve early rheumatoid arthritis were randomised in the NORD-STAR trial to ACT, certolizumab pegol, abatacept or tocilizumab, all with methotrexate. Centralised laboratory analyses for ACPA, RF and SE were performed. Clinical Disease Activity Index remission was analysed longitudinally with logistic generalised estimating equations. Differences in treatment effect across RF, ACPA and SE subgroups were assessed with interaction terms at 24 and 48 weeks, adjusted for sex, country, age, body mass index, Disease Activity Score of 28 joints based on C-reactive protein and smoking. RESULTS: In total, 778 patients were included. At 24 weeks, abatacept treatment showed a better response than ACT in the RF and/or ACPA-positive subgroups, but this effect was not significantly different from the negative subgroups. By 48 weeks, abatacept treatment showed better response regardless of RF/ACPA status. No differences were found across RF, ACPA, SE allele, valine at amino acid position 11 or valine-arginine-alanine haplotype subgroups for any biological treatment at 48 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this randomised controlled trial, abatacept treatment was associated with a better response than ACT in the RF and/or ACPA-positive subgroup at 24 weeks, but this was no longer seen at 48 weeks; adding SE allele-related genetic markers did not strengthen the association. Moreover, ACPA, RF and SE allele-related genotypes were not, alone or in combination, associated with clinical responses of importance sufficiently strongly to warrant implementation in clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EudraCT 2011-004720-35; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01491815.

Abatacept retention and clinical effectiveness in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in a real-world setting in Taiwan.

AIM: To evaluate real-world abatacept retention and clinical outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Taiwan. METHODS: This prospective, observational study enrolled patients with rheumatoid arthritis aged ≥20 years who received abatacept in real-world practice. The primary endpoint was the abatacept retention rate at 24 months. Patients were categorized into subgroups based on abatacept treatment status and previous biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) therapy. Risk factors affecting abatacept retention were determined by regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 212 patients were enrolled. The overall abatacept retention rate at 24 months among all patients was 59.9% (95% confidence interval 53.0%-66.6%). Patients who were ongoing users of abatacept and bDMARD-naïve had the highest retention rate (76.3%); of these, 31.6% achieved low disease activity or remission after 2 years. Previous treatment with bDMARDs was associated with an increased risk of abatacept discontinuation (hazard ratio 1.99; p = .002). The most common reasons for abatacept discontinuation were drug switch (11.3%) and loss to follow-up (6.1%). Abatacept was well-tolerated with no new safety signals. CONCLUSION: The 24-month retention rate of abatacept was 59.9%; abatacept was associated with improved clinical outcomes and was well-tolerated in the real-world setting in Taiwan.

Subcutaneous vs intravenous abatacept in rheumatoid arthritis-interstitial lung disease. National multicentre study of 397 patients.

BACKGROUND: Evidence on abatacept (ABA) utility for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) - associated interstitial lung disease (ILD) is growing. Clinical trials have shown equivalence in subcutaneous (SC) and intravenous (IV) administration of ABA for articular manifestations. However, this has not been studied in respiratory outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of ABA in RA-ILD patients according to the route of administration. METHODS: National retrospective multicentre study of RA-ILD patients on treatment with ABA. They were divided into 2 groups: a) IV, and b) SC. The following outcomes were analysed from baseline to final follow-up using linear mixed models: a) forced vital capacity (FVC), b) diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO), c) chest high resolution computed tomography (HRCT), d) dyspnoea, e) RA activity, and f) sparing corticosteroids effect. RESULTS: A total of 397 patients were included (94 IV-ABA and 303 SC-ABA), median follow-up of 24 [10-48] months. After adjustment for possible confounders, FVC and DLCO remained stable during the first 24 months without differences between IV-ABA and SC-ABA (p = 0.6304 and 0.5337). Improvement/ stability of lung lesions in HRCT was observed in 67 % of patients (75 % IV-ABA, 64 % SC-ABA; p = 0.07). Dyspnoea stabilized/ improved in 84 % of patients (90 % IV-ABA, 82 % SC-ABA; p = 0.09). RA - disease activity improved in both groups. No statistically significant differences regarding any of the variables studied between the two groups were found. ABA was withdrawn in 87 patients (21.9 %), 45 % IV-ABA and 37 % SC-ABA (p = 0.29). ILD worsening and articular inefficacy were the most common reasons for ABA discontinuation. CONCLUSION: In patients with RA-ILD, ABA seems to be equally effective regardless of the route of administration.

S100 proteins as potential predictive biomarkers of abatacept response in polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) comprises a heterogeneous group of conditions that can cause marked disability and diminished quality of life. Data on predictors of clinical response are insufficient to guide selection of the appropriate biologic agent for individual patients. This study aimed to investigate the propensity of S100A8/9 and S100A12 as predictive biomarkers of abatacept response in polyarticular-course juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pJIA). METHODS: Data from a phase 3 trial (NCT01844518) of subcutaneous abatacept in patients with active pJIA (n = 219) were used in this exploratory analysis. Association between biomarker levels at baseline and improvements in JIA-American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria responses or baseline disease activity (measured by Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score in 27 joints using C-reactive protein [JADAS27-CRP]) were assessed. Biomarker level changes from baseline to month 4 were assessed for disease outcome prediction up to 21 months. RESULTS: At baseline, 158 patients had available biomarker samples. Lower baseline S100A8/9 levels (≤ 3295 ng/mL) were associated with greater odds of achieving JIA-ACR90 (odds ratio [OR]: 2.54 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.25-5.18]), JIA-ACR100 (OR: 3.72 [95% CI: 1.48-9.37]), JIA-ACR inactive disease (ID; OR: 4.25 [95% CI: 2.03-8.92]), JADAS27-CRP ID (OR: 2.34 [95% CI: 1.02-5.39]) at month 4, and JIA-ACR ID (OR: 3.01 [95% CI: 1.57-5.78]) at month 16. Lower baseline S100A12 levels (≤ 176 ng/mL) were associated with greater odds of achieving JIA-ACR90 (OR: 2.52 [95% CI: 1.23-5.13]), JIA-ACR100 (OR: 3.68 [95% CI: 1.46-9.28]), JIA-ACR ID (OR: 3.66 [95% CI: 1.76-7.61]), JIA-ACR90 (OR: 2.03 [95% CI: 1.07-3.87]), JIA-ACR100 (OR: 2.14 [95% CI: 1.10-4.17]), and JIA-ACR ID (OR: 4.22 [95% CI: 2.15-8.29]) at month 16. From baseline to month 4, decreases in S100A8/9 and S100A12 generally exceeded 50% among JIA-ACR90/100/ID responders. CONCLUSION: Lower baseline levels of S100A8/9 and S100A12 proteins predicted better response to abatacept treatment than higher levels and may serve as early predictive biomarkers in pJIA. Decreases in these biomarker levels may also predict longer-term response to abatacept in pJIA.

Assessing the effects of distinct biologic therapies on rheumatoid arthritis pain by nociceptive, neuropathic and nociplastic pain components: a randomised feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Pain management is a major unmet need in people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Although many patients are treated with disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDS), including biologic therapies, many people with RA continue to experience significant pain. We aimed to determine whether performing a comprehensive pain evaluation is feasible in people with active RA receiving conventional DMARDs and biologic therapies. METHODS: The BIORA-PAIN feasibility study was an open-label, randomised trial, which recruited participants suitable for treatment with biologic therapy. The primary feasibility outcomes were recruitment, randomisation and retention of eligible participants. All participants underwent pain assessment for nociceptive, neuropathic and nociplastic pain during the 12-month study period, with quarterly assessments for VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) pain, painDETECT and QST (quantitative sensory testing). This trial was registered in clinicaltrials.gov NCT04255134. RESULTS: During the study period, 93 participants were screened of whom 25 were eligible: 13 were randomised to adalimumab and 12 to abatacept. Participant recruitment was lower than expected due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Pain assessments were practical in the clinical trial setting. An improvement was observed for VAS pain from baseline over 12 months, with a mean (SEM) of 3.7 (0.82) in the abatacept group and 2.3 (1.1) in the adalimumab group. There was a reduction in painDETECT and improvement in QST measures in both treatment groups during the study. Participant feedback included that some of the questionnaire-based pain assessments were lengthy and overlapped in their content. Adverse events were similar in both groups. There was one death due to COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: This first-ever feasibility study of a randomised controlled trial assessing distinct modalities of pain in RA met its progression criteria. This study demonstrates that it is feasible to recruit and assess participants with active RA for specific modalities of pain, including nociceptive, neuropathic and nociplastic elements. Our data suggests that it is possible to stratify people for RA based on pain features. The differences in pain outcomes between abatacept and adalimumab treated groups warrant further investigation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04255134, Registered on Feb 5, 2020.

Factors contributing to the improvement in J-HAQ after 3 years of treatment with abatacept in biologic-naïve rheumatoid arthritis patients: Interim results of a long-term, observational, multicentre study in Japan (ORIGAMI).

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the long-term effectiveness, safety, and factors affecting Japanese Health Assessment Questionnaire (J-HAQ) improvement during abatacept treatment in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. METHODS: The ORIGAMI study is an ongoing observational study of biologic-naïve RA patients with moderate disease activity treated with subcutaneous abatacept (125 mg, once-weekly). Patients treated with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) were extracted from the Institute of Rheumatology, Rheumatoid Arthritis (IORRA) registry as an historical, weighted control group. The primary endpoint for this interim analysis was the proportion of patients with J-HAQ remission (score ≤0.5) at 3 years. RESULTS: Among 279 abatacept-treated and 220 csDMARD-treated patients, J-HAQ remission was achieved at 3 years in 40.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 34.7%-46.2%) and 28.9% (95% CI 9.9%-47.8%), respectively. Age, RA duration <1 year, baseline J-HAQ score, and Simplified Disease Activity Index remission at 6 months were associated with 3-year J-HAQ remission in the abatacept group. Overall, 24/298 patients (8.1%; safety analysis set) experienced serious adverse drug reactions with an incidence of 5.3 per 100 person-years. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed the 3-year effectiveness and safety, and revealed potential factors associated with J-HAQ remission in biologic-naïve RA patients treated with abatacept in real-world clinical practice.

Effect of Immunotherapy on C-peptide Levels in Patients With Type I Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Type 1 diabetes mellitus is an autoimmune condition characterized by insulin deficiency resulting from loss of function of beta cells in the pancreas, leading to hyperglycemia and associated long-term systemic complications and even death. Immunotherapy demonstrates beta cell function-preserving potential; however, its impact on C-peptide levels, a definitive biomarker of beta cell function, and endogenous insulin secretion remain unclear. A systematic review of various immunotherapeutic interventions is hence needed for a comprehensive assessment of their effectiveness as well as identifying research gaps and influencing future research and clinical decisions. An extensive literature search was done in PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases using precise keywords and filters to identify relevant studies. Three independent reviewers assessed eligibility according to predetermined eligibility criteria, and data was extracted. The Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool (RoB 2.0) was used to evaluate the quality and validity of the included studies. A senior reviewer resolved discrepancies and differences of opinion between independent reviewers. A total of 11 studies were included, with 1464 study participants. Both Phase II and III trials were included. Within the included studies, four studies assessed the anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody otelixizumab as an intervention. Another anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody, teplizumab, was assessed as an intervention in four studies, whereas two studies assessed the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab and one study assessed abatacept as its interventional drug. Otelixizumab demonstrated benefits at higher doses but was associated with adverse effects like Ebstein-Barr virus reactivation and cytomegalovirus infection, while at lower doses it failed to show a significant difference in C-peptide levels or glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Teplizumab, on the other hand, showed promise in reducing C-peptide loss and exogenous insulin requirements and was associated with adverse events such as rash, lymphopenia, urinary tract infection, and cytokine release syndrome. However, these reactions were only associated with therapy initiation, and they subsided on their own. Rituximab improved C-peptide responses, and abatacept therapy demonstrated reduced loss of C-peptide, improved C-peptide levels, and lowered HbA1c. Teplizumab, rituximab, otelixizumab, and abatacept show potential for preserving beta cell function by reducing C-peptide loss in patients with type I diabetes mellitus. However, careful monitoring of adverse reactions, particularly viral infections and cytokine release syndrome, is necessary for the safe implementation of these therapies.

Transverse Myelitis: An Adverse Reaction to Abatacept.

Immunotherapies are powerful disease-modifying agents in treating autoimmune diseases like rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, their unique mechanisms of action confer a broad spectrum of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which tend to be rare but complex, with significant risk for morbidity and mortality. We report a case of transverse myelitis in a patient with RA whose joint disease had been well-controlled with long-term intravenous abatacept. Suspicion of an unusual irAE in this elderly patient, whose neurologic symptomatology was gradual and protracted, prompted the discontinuation of abatacept and the rapid initiation of corticosteroid therapy. These interventions yielded a favorable clinical outcome for the patient. We must draw clinicians' attention to this rare but potentially consequential adverse drug reaction.