Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 75
Filter
1.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 11: 1382609, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39219795

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The curriculum for a da Vinci surgeon in gynecology requires special training before a surgeon performs their first independent case, but standardized, objective assessments of a trainee's workflow or skills learned during clinical cases are lacking. This pilot study presents a methodology to evaluate intraoperative surgeon behavior in hysterectomy cases through standardized surgical step segmentation paired with objective performance indicators (OPIs) calculated directly from robotic data streams. This method can provide individual case analysis in a truly objective capacity. Materials and methods: Surgical data from six robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomies (rTLH) performed by two experienced surgeons was collected prospectively using an Intuitive Data Recorder. Each rTLH video was annotated and segmented into specific, functional surgical steps based on the recorded video. Once annotated, OPIs were compared through workflow analysis and across surgeons during two critical surgical steps: colpotomy and vaginal cuff closure. Results: Through visualization of the individual steps over time, we observe workflow consistencies and variabilities across individual surgeons of a similar experience level at the same hospital, creating unique surgeon behavior signatures across each surgical case. OPI differences across surgeons were observed for both the colpotomy and vaginal cuff closure steps, specifically reflecting camera movement, energy usage and clutching behaviors. Comparing colpotomy and vaginal cuff closure time needed for the step and the events of energy use were significantly different (p < 0.001). For the comparison between the two surgeons only the event count for camera movement during colpotomy showed significant differences (p = 0.03). Conclusion: This pilot study presents a novel methodology to analyze and compare individual rTLH procedures with truly objective measurements. Through collection of robotic data streams and standardized segmentation, OPI measurements for specific rTLH surgery steps can be reliably calculated and compared to those of other surgeons. This provides opportunity for critical standardization to the gynecology field, which can be integrated into individualized training plans in the future. However, more studies are needed to establish context surrounding these metrics in gynecology.

2.
Am J Surg ; 237: 115769, 2024 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38796376

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the impact of surgical modalities on surgeon wellbeing with a focus on burnout, job satisfaction, and interventions used to address neuromusculoskeletal disorders (NMSDs). METHODS: An electronic survey was sent to surgeons across an academic integrated multihospital system. The survey consisted of 47 questions investigating different aspects of surgeons' wellbeing. RESULTS: Out of 245 thoracic and abdominopelvic surgeons, 79 surgeons (32.2 â€‹%) responded, and 65 surgeons (82 â€‹%) were able to be categorized as having a dominant surgical modality. Compared to robotic surgeons, laparoscopic (p â€‹= â€‹0.042) and open (p â€‹= â€‹0.012) surgeons reported more frequent feelings of burnout. The number of surgeons who used any treatment/intervention to minimize the operative discomfort/pain was lower for robotic surgeons than the other three modalities (all p â€‹< â€‹0.05). CONCLUSIONS: NMSDs affect different aspects of surgeons' lives and occupations. Robotic surgery was associated with decreased feelings of burnout than the other modalities.


Subject(s)
Burnout, Professional , Job Satisfaction , Surgeons , Humans , Burnout, Professional/epidemiology , Burnout, Professional/psychology , Male , Surgeons/psychology , Surgeons/statistics & numerical data , Female , Surveys and Questionnaires , Musculoskeletal Diseases/surgery , Musculoskeletal Diseases/psychology , Neuromuscular Diseases/psychology , Neuromuscular Diseases/surgery , Adult , Middle Aged , Robotic Surgical Procedures/psychology , Laparoscopy
4.
Cureus ; 16(1): e52148, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38344598

ABSTRACT

Robotic technology has transformed the field of surgery significantly. Since its inception in the 1970s, robotic surgery has advanced tremendously. The utilization of robotic systems, such as the da Vinci Surgical System, has become increasingly prevalent in minimally invasive procedures. These interventions offer enhanced precision, dexterity, and visualization. In general surgery, robotics has facilitated complex procedures, leading to reduced morbidity and shorter hospital stays. In urology, the robotic platform has revolutionized prostatectomies and other intricate interventions, demonstrating superior outcomes compared to traditional approaches. Orthopedic surgery has embraced robotics for precise joint replacements and spinal procedures. In pediatric surgery, the application of robotics has enabled intricate surgeries with reduced invasiveness and faster recovery times. Furthermore, the integration of artificial intelligence with robotic systems has paved the way for personalized treatment plans and data-driven decision-making. Despite these advancements, challenges such as cost and training persist. As robotic technology continues to evolve, its potential applications extend beyond current boundaries. This review aims to provide insights into the multifaceted impact of the robotic revolution in surgery and the exciting possibilities that lie ahead.

5.
J Thorac Dis ; 16(1): 542-552, 2024 Jan 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38410564

ABSTRACT

Background: The main difficulty of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis (IL) procedure for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEGJ) is the intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis (IEA). We aimed to assess the safety and feasibility of the IL procedure with the da Vinci surgical system for treatment of AEGJ with semi-mechanical intrathoracic IEA. Methods: The cohort included 72 patients with AEGJ who received treatment at the Department of Minimally Invasive Esophagus Surgery of the Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital from August 2020 to March 2023. Of these 72 patients, 17 received neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy. The robot-assisted minimally invasive IL procedure was performed using a linear stapler for overlap side-to-side intrathoracic anastomosis and the stapler defect was closed with double full-layer continuous sutures by robotic hand-sewn (semi-mechanical) IEA. Results: Of the 72 AEGJ patients, 2 were converted to exploration, 7 were converted to laparotomy and thoracotomy for circular-stapled intrathoracic anastomosis, and 6 were converted to thoracotomy for circular-stapled anastomosis, which included 2 cases of extensive pleural adhesion and 4 cases of overlap anastomosis failure, whereas 57 underwent the robot-assisted minimally invasive IL procedure with semi-mechanical IEA. Among the 9 patients converted to laparotomy, the laparotomy rate was closely related to the Siewert classification (P<0.005) and preoperative use of neoadjuvant therapy (P<0.05). Among the 57 patients who underwent the robot-assisted minimally invasive IL procedure with semi-mechanical IEA, there were 2 cases of anastomotic leakages (2/57, 3.5%), no case of anastomotic stricture, 5 cases of postoperative pneumonia (5/57, 8.77%), 2 cases of intensive care unit admission (2/57, 3.5%), and 1 case of readmission within 30 days (1/57, 1.75%). None of the patients died within 30 days after surgery. Conclusions: The robot-assisted minimally invasive IL procedure with semi-mechanical IEA is both safe and feasible for AEGJ. However, caution is advised for patients with Siewert type III AEGJ and those who have already received preoperative neoadjuvant therapy.

6.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ; 15: 1337322, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38362277

ABSTRACT

Background: Robotic assistance in thyroidectomy is a developing field that promises enhanced surgical precision and improved patient outcomes. This study investigates the impact of the da Vinci Surgical System on operative efficiency, learning curve, and postoperative outcomes in thyroid surgery. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 104 patients who underwent robotic thyroidectomy between March 2018 and January 2022. We evaluated the learning curve using the Cumulative Sum (CUSUM) analysis and analyzed operative times, complication rates, and postoperative recovery metrics. Results: The cohort had a mean age of 36 years, predominantly female (68.3%). The average body mass index (BMI) was within the normal range. A significant reduction in operative times was observed as the series progressed, with no permanent hypoparathyroidism or recurrent laryngeal nerve injuries reported. The learning curve plateaued after the 37th case. Postoperative recovery was consistent, with no significant difference in hospital stay duration. Complications were minimal, with a noted decrease in transient vocal cord palsy as experience with the robotic system increased. Conclusion: Robotic thyroidectomy using the da Vinci system has demonstrated a significant improvement in operative efficiency without compromising safety. The learning curve is steep but manageable, and once overcome, it leads to improved surgical outcomes and high patient satisfaction. Further research with larger datasets and longer follow-up is necessary to establish the long-term benefits of robotic thyroidectomy.


Subject(s)
Robotic Surgical Procedures , Robotics , Thyroid Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Adult , Male , Retrospective Studies , Thyroid Neoplasms/surgery
7.
Jpn J Clin Oncol ; 54(3): 248-253, 2024 Mar 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38061912

ABSTRACT

Transoral robotic surgery (TORS), introduced by Weinstein et al. in 2005, has been widely adopted as a minimally invasive procedure, particularly for the treatment of patients with early stage oropharyngeal cancer. TORS is typically performed using the da Vinci Surgical System, similar to robot-assisted surgeries for other malignancies. The main difference between TORS and these other robot-assisted surgeries is that it is performed through the natural orifice of the mouth, which limits the surgical working space, and that it progresses from the lumen of the pharynx to the deeper tissues. The advantages of TORS are mainly due to the benefits of using the da Vinci Surgical System, such as three-dimensional high-definition images, magnification, multiple forceps articulation, tremor-stabilization function and motion scale function. To date, many big data and meta-analyses have shown that TORS is superior to conventional surgeries, such as open surgery, in terms of oncological outcomes, post-operative functionality and quality of life. In Japan, TORS is expected to spread across the country, as it has been covered by health insurance since April 2022. This review highlights the procedures of TORS, its unique aspects, its unparalleled advantages as a minimally invasive surgery for treating laryngeal and pharyngeal cancers, and its current status in Japan.


Subject(s)
Pharyngeal Neoplasms , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Humans , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Japan , Quality of Life , Mouth/surgery
8.
Surg Endosc ; 38(2): 529-539, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38062181

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Endometriosis is a chronic condition affecting 6-10% of women of reproductive age, with endometriosis-related pain and infertility being the leading symptoms. Currently, the gold standard treatment approach to surgery is conventional laparoscopy (CL); however, the increasing availability of robot-assisted surgery is projected as a competitor of CL. This study aimed to compare the perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopy (RAL) and CL in endometriosis surgery. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of these two procedures. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in three medical databases. Studies investigating different perioperative outcomes of endometriosis-related surgeries were included. Results are presented as odds ratios (OR) or mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Our search yielded 2,014 records, of which 13 were eligible for data extraction. No significant differences were detected between the CL and RAL groups in terms of intraoperative complications (OR = 1.07, CI 0.43-2.63), postoperative complications (OR = 1.3, CI 0.73-2.32), number of conversions to open surgery (OR = 1.34, CI 0.76-2.37), length of hospital stays (MD = 0.12, CI 0.33-0.57), blood loss (MD = 16.73, CI 4.18-37.63) or number of rehospitalizations (OR = 0.95, CI 0.13-6.75). In terms of operative times (MD = 28.09 min, CI 11.59-44.59) and operating room times (MD = 51.39 min, CI 15.07-87.72;), the RAL technique remained inferior. CONCLUSION: RAL does not have statistically demonstrable advantages over CL in terms of perioperative outcomes for endometriosis-related surgery.


Subject(s)
Endometriosis , Laparoscopy , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Robotics , Female , Humans , Endometriosis/surgery , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Laparoscopy/methods , Intraoperative Complications/surgery
9.
Surg Endosc ; 37(12): 9244-9254, 2023 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37872425

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We compared surgeons' workload, physical discomfort, and neuromusculoskeletal disorders (NMSDs) across four surgical modalities: endoscopic, laparoscopic, open, and robot-assisted (da Vinci Surgical Systems). METHODS: An electronic survey was sent to the surgeons across an academic hospital system. The survey consisted of 47 questions including: (I) Demographics and anthropometrics; (II) The percentage of the procedural time that the surgeon spent on performing each surgical modality; (III) Physical and mental demand and physical discomfort; (IV) Neuromusculoskeletal symptoms including body part pain and NMSDs. RESULTS: Seventy-nine out of 245 surgeons completed the survey (32.2%) and 65 surgeons (82.2%) had a dominant surgical modality: 10 endoscopic, 15 laparoscopic, 26 open, and 14 robotic surgeons. Physical demand was the highest for open surgery and the lowest for endoscopic and robotic surgeries, (all p < 0.05). Open and robotic surgeries required the highest levels of mental workload followed by laparoscopic and endoscopic surgeries, respectively (all p < 0.05 except for the difference between robotic and laparoscopic that was not significant). Body part discomfort or pain (immediately after surgery) were lower in the shoulder for robotic surgeons compared to laparoscopic and open surgeons and in left fingers for robotic surgeons compared to endoscopic surgeons (all p < 0.05). The prevalence of NMSD was significantly lower in robotic surgeons (7%) compared to the other surgical modalities (between 60 and 67%) (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The distribution of NMSDs, workload, and physical discomfort varied significantly based on preferred surgical approach. Although robotic surgeons had fewer overall complaints, improvement in ergonomics of surgery are still warranted.


Subject(s)
Laparoscopy , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Robotics , Surgeons , Humans , Ergonomics , Pain , Laparoscopy/adverse effects
10.
Cureus ; 15(7): e42370, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37621804

ABSTRACT

Robotic surgery (RS) is an evolution of minimally invasive surgery that combines medical science, robotics, and engineering. The first robots approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) were the Da Vinci Surgical System and the ZEUS Robotic Surgical System, which have been improving over time. Through the decades, the equipment applied to RS had undergone a wide transformation as a response to the development of new techniques and facilities for the assembly and implementation of the own. RS has revolutionized the field of urology, enabling surgeons to perform complex procedures with greater precision and accuracy, and many other surgical specialties such as gynecology, general surgery, otolaryngology, cardiothoracic surgery, and neurosurgery. Several benefits, such as a better approach to the surgical site, a three-dimensional image that improves depth perception, and smaller scars, enhance range of motion, allowing the surgeon to conduct more complicated surgical operations, and reduced postoperative complications have made robotic-assisted surgery an increasingly popular approach. However, some points like the cost of surgical procedures, equipment-instrument, and maintenance are important aspects to consider. Machine learning will likely have a role to play in surgical training shortly through "automated performance metrics," where algorithms observe and "learn" individual surgeons' techniques, assess performance, and anticipate surgical outcomes with the potential to individualize surgical training and aid decision-making in real time.

11.
J Robot Surg ; 17(5): 2297-2303, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37335524

ABSTRACT

Subcutaneous emphysema (SE), a complication of robotic gastrectomy (RG), occurs when the gas used to establish pneumoperitoneum escapes and enters the soft tissue. SE typically does not result in major clinical problems, but massive SE can have life-threatening consequences. Hence, developing adequate preventive methods against postoperative SE is essential. We aimed to determine whether an existing protective device, the LAP PROTECTOR™ (LP), can be used to reduce the incidence of SE after RG. We analyzed the data of 194 patients who underwent RG at our hospital between August 2016 and December 2022. Since September 2021 (the 102nd patient), we have used the LP (FF0504; Hakko Medical, Hongo, Tokyo, Japan) at the trocar site, as this was expected to reduce the incidence of SE. The primary endpoint of this study was the efficacy of the LP in reducing the incidence of clinically relevant SE (defined as SE extending into the cervical area) a day after RG. Univariate analysis revealed that sex, body mass index (BMI), and LP usage differed significantly between patients with and without postoperative SE. Logistic regression analysis revealed that male sex (odds ratio [OR]: 0.22, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.15-0.72, P < 0.001), high BMI (OR: 0.13, 95% CI: 1.23-4.45, P = 0.009), and LP usage (OR: 0.11, 95% CI: 0.04-0.3, P < 0.001) were preventive factors independently associated with a lower incidence of clinically relevant SE. Placing an LP at the trocar site may be a safe and effective method of preventing SE after RG.


Subject(s)
Laparoscopy , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Stomach Neoplasms , Subcutaneous Emphysema , Humans , Male , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Laparoscopy/methods , Treatment Outcome , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Gastrectomy/adverse effects , Gastrectomy/methods , Subcutaneous Emphysema/etiology , Subcutaneous Emphysema/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Retrospective Studies
12.
Khirurgiia (Mosk) ; (3): 52-57, 2023.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36800869

ABSTRACT

The generally accepted method for choledochal cysts is total resection of cystic extrahepatic bile ducts and gallbladder followed by biliodigestive anastomosis. Minimally invasive interventions have recently become the «gold¼ standard in pediatric hepatobiliary surgery. However, laparoscopic resection of choledochal cysts has certain disadvantages related to difficult positioning of instruments in narrow surgical field. The disadvantages of laparoscopy can be compensated by surgical robots. A 13-year-old girl underwent robot-assisted resection of hepaticocholedochal cyst, cholecystectomy and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. Total anesthesia time was 6 hours. Laparoscopic stage took 55 min, docking of robotic complex - 35 min. Robotic stage of surgery required 230 min, removal of cyst and suturing the wounds - 35 min. Postoperative period was uneventful. Enteral nutrition was started after 3 days, and drainage tube was removed after 5 day. The patient was discharged after 10 postoperative days. The follow-up period was 6 months. Thus, robot-assisted resection of choledochal cysts in children is possible and safe.


Subject(s)
Choledochal Cyst , Laparoscopy , Robotics , Female , Child , Humans , Adolescent , Choledochal Cyst/diagnosis , Choledochal Cyst/surgery , Robotics/methods , Anastomosis, Roux-en-Y/adverse effects , Anastomosis, Roux-en-Y/methods , Common Bile Duct/surgery , Liver/surgery , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Laparoscopy/methods
14.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 75(10): 3664-3672, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36068136

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Robotic reconstructive surgery has been performed since 2012 at our institution. The purpose of this study was to report our 10-year experience with robot-assisted reconstructive surgery and compare the clinical outcomes of different robotic models. METHODS: Medical records of 41 patients who had chest or breast reconstruction during October 2012 ∼ May 2021 were reviewed retrospectively. Different robotic models were evaluated and compared in terms of surgical technique, demographic variables, postoperative complication, and operative parameters. esthetic assessments were performed by four plastic surgeons to evaluate symmetry, scar formation, and general esthetic features based on patients' photographs. RESULTS: Overall, out of 41 robot-assisted reconstructive surgeries, 13 were performed with the Da Vinci Si model, 18 with the Da Vinci Xi model, and 10 with the Da Vinci Sp model. The docking time, robot operation time, and hospitalization time were shorter for surgeries, which used the Da Vinci Sp model than other models. All other complications and operative parameters showed no significant difference. Improved esthetic outcome was achieved for all patient groups. Group Sp had the most favorable score, followed by Group Xi and Group Si, although there were no statistical implications. CONCLUSIONS: Ever since the introduction of the Da Vinci model in 2012, we have successfully implemented the robot-assisted reconstructive surgery. Surgical technique improved over the last 10 years. With the introduction of the Sp model, we are now at the stage of further developing the surgical technique and establishing the robotic reconstructive surgery.


Subject(s)
Plastic Surgery Procedures , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Robotics , Superficial Back Muscles , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods
15.
Front Surg ; 9: 930536, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36157403

ABSTRACT

The anterior approach is one of the widely used surgical treatments for lumbar spondylodiscitis, but it has the disadvantages of large trauma and a high incidence of complications. Our experiences suggested that the laparoscopic retroperitoneal approach could be effective to overcome those disadvantages of the anterior approach. Herein, we report two cases of successfully treated lumbar pyogenic spondylodiscitis using a robot-assisted laparoscopic retroperitoneal approach. The technique utilizes a robot that allows a laparoscopic retroperitoneal approach while offering excellent high-definition images of three-dimensional vision. After the operation, both patients achieved good formation and fusion of the vertebrae. Preliminary evidence suggests that the robot-assisted laparoscopic retroperitoneal approach may be feasible for the treatment of lumbar spondylodiscitis.

16.
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg ; 17(8): 1469-1476, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35471624

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Semantic segmentation and activity classification are key components to create intelligent surgical systems able to understand and assist clinical workflow. In the operating room, semantic segmentation is at the core of creating robots aware of clinical surroundings, whereas activity classification aims at understanding OR workflow at a higher level. State-of-the-art semantic segmentation and activity recognition approaches are fully supervised, which is not scalable. Self-supervision can decrease the amount of annotated data needed. METHODS: We propose a new 3D self-supervised task for OR scene understanding utilizing OR scene images captured with ToF cameras. Contrary to other self-supervised approaches, where handcrafted pretext tasks are focused on 2D image features, our proposed task consists of predicting relative 3D distance of image patches by exploiting the depth maps. By learning 3D spatial context, it generates discriminative features for our downstream tasks. RESULTS: Our approach is evaluated on two tasks and datasets containing multiview data captured from clinical scenarios. We demonstrate a noteworthy improvement in performance on both tasks, specifically on low-regime data where utility of self-supervised learning is the highest. CONCLUSION: We propose a novel privacy-preserving self-supervised approach utilizing depth maps. Our proposed method shows performance on par with other self-supervised approaches and could be an interesting way to alleviate the burden of full supervision.


Subject(s)
Operating Rooms , Supervised Machine Learning , Humans
17.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34979624

ABSTRACT

Da Vinci surgical system (DVSS), a novel surgical technology, is gradually applied in various surgical operations due to its accuracy and safety. In adult Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, based DVSS the Transoral Robotic Surgery and neck robotic surgery have rich experience, and gradually being extended to pediatric with preferable initial results. The purpose of this article is to summarize the application of DVSS in pediatric otolaryngologyhead and neck surgery, and and to present future prospectives. Clinicians should actively learn to adopt new techniques and advantages of DVSS, and strive to improve the outcome of surgical treatment.


Subject(s)
Otolaryngology , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Robotics , Adult , Child , Humans , Neck/surgery
18.
J Nippon Med Sch ; 89(2): 169-175, 2022 May 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34526458

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The da Vinci Si version robot lacks a vascular stapler that can be controlled by the operating surgeon at the surgical console when dividing pulmonary vessels. Therefore, to initiate and safely perform robotic anatomical lobectomy for lung cancer, it is important to develop a safe method for introducing a surgical stapler. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of the first 42 consecutive patients who underwent robotic lobectomy for lung cancer at Nippon Medical School Hospital between January 2019 and December 2020. RESULTS: Up to case 18, we performed robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) lobectomy by using a four-arm approach with two assistant ports. For dividing pulmonary vessels, the surgical stapler was introduced through the assist ports. However, since this is not the port position usually used in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), there were many difficult situations. For RATS lobectomy case 19 and all subsequent cases, we utilized a total port approach that uses three robotic arms and two assistant ports. To resect the pulmonary vessels or bronchi with endoscopic staplers, the port for the robotic arm was removed and the endoscopic staplers were placed through a 12-mm Xcel bladeless port. This change reduced operation time, blood loss, and robotic arm interference. No patient developed intraoperative complications during RATS lobectomy. CONCLUSION: The present total port approach, with three robotic arms, appears to be feasible for introducing surgical staplers during RATS with the da Vinci Si robotic system.


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Robotics , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Surgical Staplers
19.
J Robot Surg ; 16(4): 783-788, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34741713

ABSTRACT

The introduction of robotic surgery in hospitals has raised much debate given the various effects on care, costs, education and medical advancement. Purchasing discussions are often approached with more questions than answers and there is a need for reports that provide a case for whether or not such technologies are advantageous from multiple perspectives, and offer insights into ways such devices can be introduced into a hospital setting. This report provides an evidence-based review of a university-affiliated tertiary care hospital's 12-year experience with robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology and delves into the various takeaways and challenges of implementing robotic surgery. Key findings were that robotic surgery significantly reduced complication rates, lengths of hospital stays for patients and overall hospital costs. Key obstacles were large upfront costs and the need for significant leadership and collaboration. Ongoing challenges to evaluating robotics include assessing long-term survival data, making comparisons with concurrently changing hospital conditions and determining how data can be generalized to other departments and institutions.


Subject(s)
Genital Neoplasms, Female , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Robotics , Female , Genital Neoplasms, Female/surgery , Hospital Costs , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods
20.
Value Health Reg Issues ; 29: 60-65, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34801887

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Radical prostatectomy (RP) is the gold standard for the surgical treatment of localized prostate cancer, presenting better results than radiotherapy especially for high-risk patients. Although it has clinical and technical benefits compared with open and laparoscopic techniques, the robotic-assisted RP is not publicly funded in Brazil. The objective of this study was to calculate the cost-effectiveness of the robotic-assisted RP from the Brazilian public system perspective. METHODS: A state transition model was built to simulate the life of a patient undergoing RP. A total of 3 arms were compared: robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and open surgeries. The assumed time horizon was 20 years; discounts were applied to both costs and health outcomes. Events and transition probabilities were obtained in the literature, and costs were obtained in official government databases. The results were reported as incremental cost-utility ratios. RESULTS: Robotic-assisted surgery was found to be costlier but more effective than both open and laparoscopic techniques, resulting in Brazilian reals 4518 per quality-adjusted life-year and Brazilian reals 3631 per quality-adjusted life-year incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study gives relevant inputs for decision making regarding the inclusion of robotic-assisted RP in the Brazilian public formularies. The study demonstrates that the technology is cost-effective even when considering willingness-to-pay thresholds lower than the traditionally used ones.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Brazil , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans , Male , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Prostatectomy/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Robotic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL