Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters








Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Pathol Res Pract ; 254: 155077, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38277754

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The prognostic role of resection margin status following total (TP) and distal (DP) pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is insufficiently evaluated. In Denmark, pancreatic surgery, including the postoperative pathological examination of the resection specimens, is confined to four centres, all reporting to the Danish Pancreatic Cancer Database (DPCD). In this Danish population-based nationwide study on TP and DP for PDAC from 2015-2019, based on data from DPCD, we evaluated whether there is a prognostically relevant minimum margin clearance definition and whether certain margins hold independent prognostic information. METHODS: Clinical and pathological data were retrieved from DPCD and supplemented by review of pathology reports and re-microscopy, if needed. One of the study pathologists performed all re-microscopy. The prognostic significance of margin status was evaluated by dichotomisation of the TP cohort (n = 101) and the DP cohort (n = 90) into involved and uninvolved groups, using different clearance definitions (0.5 - ≥3.0 mm). RESULTS: Following TP, direct involvement of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) margin had independent prognostic value. When using a clearance definition of ≥ 0.5 or ≥ 1.5 mm for SMA, median survival for R0 versus R1 was 19 (95% CI 14-26) versus 10 (95% CI 5-20) months (p = 0.010), and 21 (95% CI 15-30) versus 10 (95% CI 8-19) months (p = 0.011), respectively. Overall margin status was not of significant prognostic importance following neither DP nor TP. CONCLUSION: In this Danish population-based nationwide study, SMA margin involvement was a significant isolated prognostic factor following TP, whereas combined assessment of all circumferential margins did not hold statistically significant prognostic information. Following DP, resection margin status did not affect survival.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Humans , Prognosis , Pancreatectomy , Margins of Excision , Retrospective Studies , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/pathology , Denmark/epidemiology , Pancreaticoduodenectomy
3.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 45(2): 147-52, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26522780

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to estimate the width of free margin with a significant impact on local recurrence in surgical resection of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Clinical and pathological data of 127 consecutive patients who underwent radical resection of OSCC were analyzed retrospectively. The local control rate was compared between patients with clear, close, and involved surgical margins, changing the required width of free margin for the definition of 'close surgical margin' (from 1 to 5mm). If a free margin of within 1, 2, or 4mm was judged a close margin, the risk of local recurrence was significantly different among the patients with clear, close, and involved surgical margins. If the definition of close margin was within 5mm of the resection margin, the difference between clear and close margin did not reach statistical significance. The results of this study suggest that 5mm of clearance at the surgical resection margin should be the index of oncological surgery. More than 5mm of histological free margin around OSCC is not justified in terms of the risk management of local recurrence and the resultant morbidity.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery , Mouth Neoplasms/pathology , Mouth Neoplasms/surgery , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Female , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
4.
Surg Oncol ; 23(2): 81-91, 2014 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24721660

ABSTRACT

Margin status is one of the most important determinants of local recurrence following breast conserving surgery. The fact that up to 60% of patients undergoing breast conserving surgery require re-excision highlights the importance of optimizing margin clearance. In this review we summarize the following perioperative measures that aim to enhance margin clearance: (1) patient risk stratification, specifically risk factors and nomograms, (2) preoperative imaging, (3) intraoperative techniques including wire-guided localization, radioguided surgery, intraoperative ultrasound-guided resection, intraoperative specimen radiography, standardized cavity shaving, and ink-directed focal re-excision; (4) and intraoperative pathology assessment techniques, namely frozen section analysis and imprint cytology. Novel surgical techniques as well as emerging technologies are also reviewed. Effective treatment requires accurate preoperative planning, developing and implementing a consistent definition of margin clearance, and using tools that provide detailed real-time intraoperative information on margin status.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Mastectomy, Segmental , Perioperative Care , Female , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL