The frequent and the unusual red cell phenotypes in Indian blood donors: A quest for rare donors.

A clinically significant red cell alloantibody is capable of accelerated destruction of red cells bearing the corresponding antigen. Knowledge of prevalence of these antigens is necessary for performing day to day work and for research in immunohematology. The primary aim of this study was to find the prevalence of 18 clinically significant blood group antigens in blood donors. Secondary objectives were to motivate and create a database of accessible, volunteer O blood group donors and to register rare donors with existing registries. A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in the department of Transfusion Medicine at a large tertiary care hospital in India from October 2016 to May 2018 with a planned sample size of 4800. Study population included healthy blood donors of either gender coming for blood donation to the blood centre. A total of 6678 samples were included in the study. First time donors were 21.41 % while 78.59 % were repeat donors. Voluntary donors constituted 15.81 % while replacement donors were 84.19 %. Male donors were 89.82 % while female donors were 10.18 %. The antigen, phenotype and gene frequencies were calculated. An extended phenotyped voluntary donor database was created and four rare donors were identified. One of these rare donors was registered with the International Rare Donor Panel (IRDP) and rest were registered in a local registry. This study might help enhance the confidence of blood banks in finding appropriate units for patients with unexpected antibodies or with rare phenotypes. It also paves a way for registering rare donors locally and internationally.

Antigen negative red blood cell inventory of Indian blood donors.

BACKGROUND: Screening the donor population for clinically important antigens and creating a database of phenotyped donors will eliminate the tedious task of large scale screening for antigen negative units. The aim of the present study is to identify donors lacking common antigens and a combination of common antigens to establish an antigen negative inventory. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Blood samples of 1221 regular blood donors were phenotyped for the clinically important common antigens of the Rh, Duffy, Kell, Kidd and MNS blood group systems using standard tube technique. RESULTS: Out of 1221 total donors tested, we observed that 261 donors lacked a combination of clinically important common antigens (C, D, e, Fya, Jka, s). After excluding the RhD negative donors in this study 15.56% lacked a combination of two or three common antigens. Of all donors, 3.2% lacked Fya and Jka antigens, 1.96% Fya and s, 1.88% Jka and s antigens and 0.57% lacked three common antigens. DISCUSSION: An antigen negative inventory of donors who lack a single common antigen or a combination of common antigens was prepared from regular donors which will prove useful for efficient management of transfusion therapy in patients with multiple antibodies against common antigens.

International rare donor panels: a review.

International rare blood donor panels or registries are important in the consistent availability of rare blood for patients who need this scarce resource. In countries where it has been possible to commit resources to this effort and often where the need is great, donors have been entered into a registry. The ISBT leadership recognized the importance of this very challenging inventory management activity and created a Working Party to support it. Individual countries support the WHO International Rare Donor Panel by submitting their donors' phenotype or genotype information to be catalogued into the database. It is extremely important that this database be cultivated and grown. The contributing countries keep their list updated and supply the blood product as they can when requested. It is known that some blood types are extremely scarce worldwide and requests for these are particularly difficult to fulfil. Thus, it is important to have a protocol to identify and recruit donors with rare blood types. It is equally or perhaps more important to ensure that the patients who need the rare blood are being managed appropriately in the presence and absence of rare blood products being available.

Red blood cell antigen portrait of self-identified black donors in Quebec.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to establish a red blood cell antigen portrait of self-identified Black donors for the province of Quebec, Canada. BACKGROUND: The demand for extensively phenotyped red blood cells is on the rise. A good example is the sickle cell patient cohort. To better answer their transfusion needs, Héma-Québec put forward great efforts to increase the recruitment of donors among cultural communities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In October 2009, an optional question was added on the record of donation to indicate the donor's ethnicity. Self-identified Black donors were extensively phenotyped by the Immunohematology Laboratory, whereas the Research and Development team genotyped red blood cell antigens to complete the picture. RESULTS: Approximately 1500 self-identified Black donors have donated blood at least once since the beginning of the programme. Genotyping results predicted rare phenotypes: 18 S-s- (3 U-, 15 U+(w) ), 15 Js(a+b-), 5 Hy-, 3 Jo(a-), 34 hr(B) +(w) /- and 15 hr(B)-. CONCLUSION: These Black donors, with or without a rare phenotype, are precious to the patient cohort depending on blood transfusions and to our organisation as the blood provider for the whole province of Quebec.

Strategies for the transfusion of subjects with complex red cell immunisation: the Bank of rare blood donors of the Region of Lombardy.

INTRODUCTION: Selecting units of rare blood for transfusion to patients with complex immunisation is one of the most critical processes of a Transfusion Centre. In January 2005 the 'Rare Blood Components Bank - Reference Centre of the Region of Lombardy' w as established with the following goals: 1) identifying regional rare blood donors; 2) creating a regional registry of rare donors; 3) organising a regional bank of liquid and frozen rare blood units; 4) setting up a regional Immunohaematology Reference Laboratory (IRL) to type donors and resolve complex cases. METHODS: The key elements in establishing the Bank were periodic meetings organised by the directors and representatives of the regional Departments of Transfusion Medicine and Haematology (DTMH) and the institution of three working groups (informatics, regulations, finance). RESULTS: The regional IRL was set up, the relevant operating procedures were distributed region-wide, software features were defined and later validated upon activation, and the funds assigned were allocated to various cost items. The number and characteristics of the donors to be typed were identified and 14 regional DTMHs started to send samples. Overall, 20,714 donors were typed, for a total of 258,003 typings, and 2,880 rare donors were identified. Of these, 97% were rare donors because of combinations of antigens (2,139 negative for the S antigen and 659 negative for the s antigen) and 3% (n=82) because they were negative for high-frequency antigens. In the first 2 years of activity, the IRL carried out investigations of 140 complex cases referred from other Centres and distributed 2,024 units with rare phenotypes to 142 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The main goal achieved in the first 24 months from the start of the project was to set up a regional network able to meet the transfusion needs of patients with complex immunisation.