A scoping review to map the implications of reusing single-use endotracheal suctioning catheter practices in mechanically ventilated patients.

INTRODUCTION: Currently there is limited evidence of the frequency of using endotracheal suctioning catheters. Due to limited resources, many low- and middle-income countries still reuse single-use suction catheters multiple times during the length of a nursing shift. This scoping review was conducted to map the impact of reusing single-use endotracheal suctioning catheters practices on mechanically ventilated patients' outcomes. METHODS: The scoping review was conducted in accordance with the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. Four databases systematically searched using predefined keywords (CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, GLOBAL HEALTH). Key electronic journals were hand searched, while reference lists of included documents and grey literature sources were screened thoroughly. Two independent reviewers completed the study selection and data extraction. A third reviewer made the final decision on any disagreements disputed records. RESULTS: In total 22 articles were identified, and 14 non-duplicate records were screened, and 8 articles were screened for full text. Six articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Differences were observed on the findings of included studies, two studies identified that reusing single-use suction catheter might increases the risk of respiratory infection, while two other studies identified no difference in contamination rate between single used or multiple-used catheters. One study indicated that reusing single-use catheters are a safe and cost-effective intervention and finally one study reported that reusing single-use catheters might reduce incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia if flushed with chlorhexidine after suctioning. CONCLUSIONS: There is no strong evidence of the frequency of using endotracheal suction catheters. Further research is needed comparing single-used versus multiple-used endotracheal suction catheters in mechanically ventilated patients. IMPLICATION FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: Nurses in resource-limited countries can follow their hospital policy regarding the changing frequency of endotracheal suction catheters due to lack of a robust evidence. Flushing suction circuits with chlorhexidine while reusing single-use catheters might reduce the risk of respiratory infections in these hospitals.

The effects of open and closed suctioning systems on neonatal pain and vital signs in neonatal intensive care units.

BACKGROUND: Endotracheal suctioning is a procedure used by neonatal intensive care unit nurses to maximize oxygenation and clear airways of secretions, and is one of the most common painful procedures causing stress in intubated newborns. AIM: This aim of this study is to compare the effects of open and closed endotracheal suctioning on pain, peak heart rate and oxygen saturation in neonates on mechanicalventilation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This experimental-design study was conducted on 30 newborns who were mechanically ventilated in the tertiary neonatal intensive care unit of a public hospital. First, closed suctioning and then open suctioning was performed on patients during the day. Pain, peak heart rate and oxygen saturation levels were evaluated before, during and 30 min after each suctioning procedure. RESULTS: Of the newborns included in the study, 53.3 % were male and 36.6 % were admitted to intensive care unit due to a heart defect. No statistically significant differences were found in pain, peak heart rate, or oxygen saturation between the open and closed suctioning methods. However, oxygen saturation levels during suctioning were lower compared to levels before and 30 min after the procedure. Additionally, peak heart rate was lower during suctioning compared to 30 min afterward. CONCLUSIONS: The study concludes that there is no significant difference between open and closed suctioning techniques concerning pain, peak heart rate, and oxygen saturation. IMPLICATIONS TO PRACTICE: Given its sterility and ease of use, the closed suction method may be preferable in clinical settings.

An Indigenous Suction-assisted Laryngoscopy and Airway Decontamination Simulation System.

Background: Suction-assisted laryngoscopy and airway decontamination (SALAD) is a new modality and training manikins are quite costly. Few modifications have been described with their pluses and minuses. We describe a low-cost simulator that replicates fluid contamination of the airway at various flow rates and allows the practice of SALAD in vitro. Materials and methods: We modified a standard Laerdal airway management trainer with locally available equipment to simulate varying rates of continuous vomiting or hemorrhage into the airway during intubation. The effectiveness of our SALAD simulator was tested during an advanced airway workshop of the Airway Management Foundation (AMF). The workshop had a brief common presentation on the learning objective of the SALAD technique followed by a demonstration to small groups of 5-6 participants at one time with necessary instructions. This was followed by a hands-on practical learning session on the simulator. Results: One hundred and five learners used the simulator including 15 faculties and 90 participants (48 on ICU and 42 on ENT workstations). At the end of the session, the workshop faculty and participants were asked to rate their level of confidence in managing similar situations in real practice on a four-point Likert scale. All 15 faculty members and 70 out of 90 participants felt very confident in managing similar situations in real practice. Fifteen participants felt fairly confident and 5 felt slightly confident. Conclusion: In resource-limited settings, our low-cost SALAD simulator is a good educational tool for training airway managers in the skills of managing continuously and rapidly soiling airways. How to cite this article: Kumar R, Kumar R. An Indigenous Suction-assisted Laryngoscopy and Airway Decontamination Simulation System. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(7):702-705.

A scoping review of pain resulting from the endotracheal suctioning of paediatric intensive care patients.

BACKGROUND: This scoping review was conducted to summarise and map studies on pain resulting from endotracheal suctioning in paediatric intensive care patients. METHOD: This scoping review conducted in June 2022 was performed by screening articles published in English. Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, MedLine and Ovid databases were used for screening. The keywords 'endotracheal suctioning', 'pain', 'paediatric intensive care' and their synonyms were used in the search. RESULTS: During the review, 280 articles were accessed, and the full texts of 14 articles were evaluated for suitability. After some of the articles were excluded from the study, abstracts of nine articles were given below. CONCLUSION: It is recommended that a greater number of randomised controlled studies should be conducted, because the number of studies with a high level of evidence on the effect of endotracheal suctioning on the pain levels of patients in the paediatric intensive care unit is very few.

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of an Automatic Closed-Suction System in Mechanically Ventilated Patients with Pneumonia: A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Non-Inferiority, Investigator-Initiated Trial.

Endotracheal suctioning is an essential but labor-intensive procedure, with the risk of serious complications. A brand new automatic closed-suction device was developed to alleviate the workload of healthcare providers and minimize those complications. We evaluated the clinical efficacy and safety of the automatic suction system in mechanically ventilated patients with pneumonia. In this multicenter, randomized, non-inferiority, investigator-initiated trial, mechanically ventilated patients with pneumonia were randomized to the automatic device (intervention) or conventional manual suctioning (control). The primary efficacy outcome was the change in the modified clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS) in 3 days. Secondary outcomes were the frequency of additional suctioning and the amount of secretion. Safety outcomes included adverse events or complications. A total of 54 participants, less than the pre-determined number of 102, were enrolled. There was no significant difference in the change in the CPIS over 72 h (-0.13 ± 1.58 in the intervention group, -0.58 ± 1.18 in the control group, p = 0.866), but the non-inferiority margin was not satisfied. There were no significant differences in the secondary outcomes and safety outcomes, with a tendency for more patients with improved tracheal mucosal injury in the intervention group. The novel automatic closed-suction system showed comparable efficacy and safety compared with conventional manual suctioning in mechanically ventilated patients with pneumonia.

Suctioning in the management of bronchiolitis: A prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Bronchiolitis accounts for a considerable number of Emergency Department (ED) visits by infants each year and is the leading cause of respiratory infection in children 2 years of age and younger. Suctioning remains one of the main supportive treatments, but suctioning practices of nasal aspiration and deep suctioning vary among practitioners in bronchiolitis management. Our objective was to explore associations between suction type and respiratory distress, oxygen saturation, and markers of respiratory compromise such as airway escalation, disposition, ED length of stay (LOS), and outpatient outcomes. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study on infants (aged 2-23 months) in a pediatric ED with bronchiolitis from September 2022 to April 2023. Infants with tracheostomies, muscular weakness, and non-invasive positive pressure ventilation were excluded. Infants were grouped into nasal aspiration, deep suctioning, or combination groups. Mean differences in respiratory scores (primary outcome) and oxygen saturation were measured at three timepoints: pre-suction, 30 and 60 min post-suction. Escalation to airway adjuncts, disposition, and ED LOS were also recorded. Discharged families were contacted for phone call interviews. RESULTS: Of 121 enrolled infants (nasal aspiration n = 31, deep suctioning n = 68, combination n = 22), 48% (n = 58) were discharged, and 90% (n = 52) completed the study call. There was no interaction between suction type and timepoint (p = 0.63) and no effect between suction type and respiratory score (p = 0.38). However, timepoint did have an effect on respiratory score between 0 and 30 min post-suction (p = 0.01) and between 0 and 60 min post-suction (p < 0.001). Admitted infants received more deep suctioning or a combination of suctioning compared to those discharged (p = 0.005). Suction type had no effect on oxygen saturation, airway adjunct escalation, length of stay, or outpatient outcomes (p > 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in respiratory scores or outpatient outcomes between suction types. Deep suctioning may not be needed in all infants with bronchiolitis.

[Suctioning in intubated and tracheotomized patients : A narrative review]. / Absaugung bei intubierten und tracheotomierten Patient*innen : Eine narrative Übersichtsarbeit.

BACKGROUND: Endotracheal suctioning in intubated or tracheotomized critically ill patients is a daily task of various professional groups in intensive and emergency medicine; however, a German language summary of current evidence is lacking. OBJECTIVE: The aim is to develop a narrative overview of current evidence on endotracheal suctioning of intubated or tracheotomized patients in the clinical setting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A literature search was conducted in the databases Cinahl, Cochrane Library, Livivo, and Medline via PubMed by nurses with an academic degree. In addition, a hand search and applying the snowball principle were performed. Following a successful critical appraisal, all English and German language publications addressing endotracheal suctioning in the context of hospital care were included. RESULTS: A total of 23 full texts were included. After developing 6 main topics on endotracheal suction 19 articles were considered in the reporting. The results showed, among others, that routine deep suctioning once per shift is contraindicated and that the catheter should be advanced no more than 0.5-1 cm beyond the distal end of the tube or tracheal cannula. Closed suction catheters offer advantages, especially for staff protection, although studies are heterogeneous. Further training of staff is obligatory. CONCLUSION: Few conclusive studies on endotracheal suction could be found; however, with the available evidence initial conclusions can be drawn which should be considered in, for example, internal standard operating procedures. Further research is needed.

Comparison of traditional and suctioning ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of renal calculi.

PURPOSE: This study aims to compare the efficiency and clinical outcomes between the suctioning ureteral access sheath (UAS) group and the traditional UAS group during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones and explore the impact of suctioning UAS on postoperative infectious complications. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of 162 patients with kidney stones who underwent RIRS with a traditional UAS (n = 74) or a suctioning UAS (n = 71) between March 2021 and May 2023. RESULTS: The mean operative time in suctioning UAS group (39.03 ± 18.01 s) was significantly shorter than that (49.73 ± 20.77 s) in the traditional UAS group (P = 0.037). The mean postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the suctioning UAS group (1.57 ± 0.82d) compared with the traditional UAS group (2.30 ± 1.6 2 d) (P = 0.032). The instant SFRs were significantly higher in the suctioning UAS group (88.73%) than in the traditional UAS group (75.68%) (P = 0.040). The overall SFR in suctioning UAS group (92.96%) was slightly higher than the traditional UAS group (85.14%). The incidence of overall complications was significantly higher in the traditional UAS group (35.14%) than in the suctioning UAS group (16.90%) (P = 0.013). In multivariate analysis, female patients (OR 0.053, P = 0.018), positive urine WBC (OR 10.382, P = 0.034), operative time > 60 min (OR 20.231, P = 0.032), and the application of traditional UAS (OR 0.042, P = 0.017) were independent risk factors associated with infectious complications. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that suctioning UAS provided a higher instant SFR and fewer postoperative infectious complications during RIRS, and patients with predictable risk factors for infectious complications could potentially benefit from the use of the suctioning UAS.

Open versus Closed Suctioning Among Mechanically Ventilated Pediatric Patients: A Randomised Control Trial.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the difference in efficacy of closed tracheal suction system (CTSS) to open tracheal suction system (OTSS) in reducing incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP). Also to evaluate their efficacy in stabilizing cardio-respiratory parameters, reducing mortality and duration of intubation. METHODS: This study was a single centre, parallel group, open label, randomized controlled study with an equal allocation (1:1) in pediatric patients requiring mechanical ventilation. A specific suction system of CTSS or OTSS was assigned to the two groups based on randomization. All the demographic, clinical, laboratory parameters and treatment outcomes were noted in the preformed sheet. RESULTS: Total 116 eligible pediatric ventilated patients were studied. Total incidence of VAP was 9 (7.75%) of which 3 occurred in open and 6 in closed suction group. Rate of VAP was similar among both the groups with RR 2.11 (95% CI 0.50-8.9). However, significant number of infection-related ventilator associated condition (IVAC) were found in CTSS (17) compared to OTSS (6) group with RR 3.5 (95% CI 1.3-9.9). SpO2 was better maintained in the CTSS group post-suction (p = 0.001). Incidence of mortality and intubation days were similar between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Incidence of VAP was similar between open and closed suction groups.

Audit on Practices of Endotracheal Suctioning in Intensive Care Unit Patients among Health Care Workers (HCWs).

Background: Endotracheal suctioning (ETS) is one of the most frequently performed invasive procedures in intensive care units (ICUs). This audit was aimed at studying current practices and knowledge regarding ETS in the Indian critical care setup, with the background aim of raising awareness regarding correct practices as per current recommendations in critically ill patients. Materials and methods: After registering the trial with the clinical trial registry, India, a structured audit questionnaire containing 20 questions pertaining to ETS was distributed through electronic media among resident doctors working in the ICUs across India. Responses received were statistically analyzed. Results: The questionnaire was sent to 530 clinicians, of which only 200 (37.73%) responded. The audit revealed that only 22% respondents set the maximum negative pressure every time before suctioning, on the suction apparatus and only 32% said they would choose a catheter size of less than half the internal diameter of the endotracheal tube (ETT). About 90% of the respondents did not routinely do any form of documentation of the ETS. Almost 72% of the responders opined that closed suction systems reduce the chances of developing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Only 46% of respondents thought that no solution should be routinely instilled in ETT during ETS. Conclusion: There is lack of awareness regarding frequency and technique of ETS, infection control and monitoring required during ETS. Institutional protocols should be in place to follow correct guidelines for performing ETS. How to cite this article: Singh R, Bhalotra AR, Sharma S. Audit on Practices of Endotracheal Suctioning in Intensive Care Unit Patients among Health Care Workers (HCWs). Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(1):58-65.

Face-to-face versus 360° VR video: a comparative study of two teaching methods in nursing education.

BACKGROUND: The practical sessions during skills laboratory simulation or clinical simulation are cores of nursing education. For this, different modalities have been devised to facilitate psychomotor skills learning. One of the commonly used educational material or instructional method to supplement skills learning across various disciplines is video-based teaching method. The opportunities of traditional two-dimensional video might be limitless and maximized with 360º virtual reality (VR) video, which offers immersive experience. This study incorporates 360º VR video into skills laboratory training as an alternative approach to face-to-face procedure demonstration. METHODS: An open-label, parallel (1:1), randomized controlled trial study was conducted among third-year undergraduate nursing students at Hiroshima University, Japan. The nursing students were block-randomized into 360º VR video and face-to-face demonstration group. After a 3-hour theoretical class of patient management on ventilator and closed-suction principles of mechanically ventilated patients in an Intensive Care Unit focused class, the 360º VR group watched the 360º VR video of closed tracheal suction (including oral) using the head-mounted display of Meta Quest 2 individually, while the face-to-face group attended the instructor's demonstration. A week after the skills laboratory, the students' psychomotor skills, knowledge, satisfaction, confidence were evaluated; the 360º VR video group's perception was explored; Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 57 students were analyzed; 27 students in the 360º VR video group and 30 students in face-to-face group. There were no statistically significant differences between both groups in skills, knowledge, and confidence. However, the face-to-face group had higher satisfaction level than the 360º VR group; this difference was statistically significant. In the 360º VR video group, 62% agreed that VR makes learning more interesting; more than half of students (62.5%) experienced VR sickness symptoms, and "feeling of drunk" is the highest. The students appreciated the ready to use, immersiveness, and realism; however, symptoms and discomfort, burdensomeness, and production limitations were improvements recommended. CONCLUSION: Although face-to-face demonstration is the established method of teaching psychomotor skills to nursing students, the use of 360º VR video could achieve similar learning effect as an alternative approach.

Comparing nasal suction devices in children with bronchiolitis: A pilot randomized control trial.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Bronchiolitis is the most common cause of lower respiratory tract infections that lead to hospitalizations in infants and young children. METHODS: In this randomized controlled pilot study, we compared two separate nasal suction devices, namely the over counter device by the brand name of NoseFrida and the standard hospital device NeoSucker, in hospitalized children with bronchiolitis to assess equivalence of length of stay within a ± 5-h equivalence margin and to compare readmission rates and associated complications. Additionally, parental satisfaction for the NoseFrida device was measured with a six question (5-point Likert scale) survey. RESULTS: There were 20 patients randomized to the NeoSucker group and 24 randomized to the NoseFrida group. The mean length of stay for the NoseFrida group was 33.5 ± 25.4 h compared to 31.0 ± 15.6 h in the NeoSucker group, which did not establish equivalence within the ±5-h equivalence margin (p = 0.352). Parents were generally satisfied with the NoseFrida. Patients treated with the two devices had similar frequencies of deep suctioning and readmission within 48 h. CONCLUSIONS: Although the mean length of stay was comparable for bronchiolitis patients treated with the NoseFrida and NeoSucker, the relatively small sample size and large amount of variability precluded demonstrating equivalence. Since this was a pilot, further studies are needed to evaluate the recommendation for the use of such devices in both the hospital setting and in the outpatient management of bronchiolitis.

A Prospective, Longitudinal Study Evaluating the Efficacy of an Automated Secretion Removal Technology.

BACKGROUND: Endotracheal suctioning causes discomfort, is associated with adverse effects, and is resource-demanding. An artificial secretion removal method, known as an automated cough, has been developed, which applies rapid, automated deflation, and inflation of the endotracheal tube cuff during the inspiratory phase of mechanical ventilation. This method has been evaluated in the hands of researchers but not when used by attending nurses. The aim of this study was to explore the efficacy of the method over the course of patient management as part of routine care. METHODS: This prospective, longitudinal, interventional study recruited 28 subjects who were intubated and mechanically ventilated. For a maximum of 7 d and on clinical need for endotracheal suctioning, the automatic cough procedure was applied. The subjects were placed in a pressure-regulated ventilation mode with elevated inspiratory pressure, and automated cuff deflation and inflation were performed 3 times, with this repeated if deemed necessary. Success was determined by resolution of the clinical need for suctioning as determined by the attending nurse. Adverse effects were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 84 procedures were performed. In 54% of the subjects, the artificial cough procedure was successful on > 70% of occasions, with 56% of all procedures considered successful. Ninety percent of all the procedures were performed in subjects who were spontaneously breathing and on pressure-support ventilation with peak inspiratory pressures of 20 cm H2O. Rates of adverse events were similar to those seen in the application of endotracheal suctioning. CONCLUSIONS: This study solely evaluated the efficacy of an automated artificial cough procedure, which illustrated the potential for reducing the need for endotracheal suctioning when applied by attending nurses in routine care.

Knowledge levels and evidence-based approaches of undergraduate nursing students on suctioning practices: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Suctioning is one of the nursing interventions frequently applied in clinical and intensive care units. In order to perform suctioning correctly and effectively, it is important for nursing students to acquire and develop this skill during their undergraduate theoretical and practical education. OBJECTIVES: The study aims to reveal the knowledge levels and evidence-based approaches of nursing students about suctioning practices. DESIGN: The study is a descriptive and cross-sectional study. SETTINGS: It was carried out in the Faculty of Nursing of two state universities in Konya between March and June 2022. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 506 undergraduate students participated in the study. METHODS: Data were collected using the Personal Information Form, the Knowledge of Suctioning Questionnaire, and the Attitude towards Evidence-Based Nursing Questionnaire. Data were analyzed by calculating number, percentage, mean, and standard deviation, and using the multiple linear regression analysis. RESULTS: The mean Attitude towards Evidence-Based Nursing Questionnaire score of the students was found to be 63.04 ± 7.91, and their mean Knowledge of Suctioning Questionnaire score was 33.46 ± 14.63. 83.8 % of the students obtained a low score from the questionnaire. Senior students had high scores on the Attitude towards Evidence-Based Nursing Questionnaire, which are significant predictive variables affecting the level of knowledge about suctioning (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: It was found that the high scores of the students on the Attitude towards Evidence-Based Nursing Questionnaire had an effect on their level of suctioning knowledge. The study also revealed that being a fourth-year student and receiving training on suctioning affected the level of suctioning knowledge.

A pilot study of skin stretching and blood circulation effects of dermal suctioning in dogs.

Dermal suctioning has been reported to yield effects similar to those of cupping therapy in humans and horses, including pain reduction, increased blood circulation, improved flexibility, and healing. However, there is a dearth of reported outcomes concerning cupping or dermal suctioning in dogs. In this study, we examined the physiological effects of dermal suctioning in dogs. Employing the Medicell MINI pro8 device, dermal suctioning was applied to the dorsal surfaces of eight healthy beagle dogs for 20 min. Metrics such as body surface temperature, rectal temperature, pulse rate, respiratory rate, and skin pinch test results were gauged. Seven healthy beagle dogs were used as controls, and the same measurements were performed without dermal suctioning. The results showed a significant increase in the body surface temperature and skin pinch test results after dermal suctioning. We believe that the elimination of torsion in the blood vessels and nerves in the shallow fascia positively affected the thermoregulatory mechanism, resulting in an increase in body surface temperature, and also improving skin flexibility. Thus, dermal suctioning promotes subcutaneous blood circulation and improves skin flexibility in dogs. Further research is needed to identify the mechanisms underlying the effects of dermal suctioning and evaluate the stress in dogs caused by the implementation of the process.

The effects of open and closed system endotracheal suctioning methods on suctioning frequency, amount of secretion, and haemodynamics: A single-blind, randomised, 2 × 2 crossover trial.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have revealed that clinicians cannot suction all available secretion in the trachea and perform more frequent suctioning with a closed suctioning system (CSS) than with an open suctioning system (OSS). There are also studies claiming that the CSS is as effective as the OSS, based on either the amount of secretion, the frequency of suctioning, or haemodynamic parameters alone. However, there is no study examining all at once. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to determine whether the CSS is as effective for secretion removal, suctioning frequency, tidal volume (VT), and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) as the OSS. METHODS: The study used a single-blind, randomised, 2 × 2 crossover (2-method, 2-arm, 2-period) design. One hundred intubated patients were randomly assigned to two study arms. Thirty-four were randomised to the CSS on the first day and the OSS on the second day (AB arm), and 35 were randomised to the OSS on the first day and the CSS on the second day (BA arm). A 12-h washout period was set between them. Haemodynamic parameters were measured just before suctioning and in the 5th minute after suctioning. The secretions obtained after suctioning were weighed, and the frequency of suctioning was recorded. RESULTS: There were no effects of method, period, or carryover on suctioning frequency and amount of secretion in the 2 × 2 crossover design t-test (p > 0.05). In the OSS, there was a weak, linear, and negative correlation between the amount of secretion and SpO2, and between VT and SpO2 measured before and after suctioning (p < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Open and closed suctioning systems were similar in terms of haemodynamic alterations, amounts of secretion, and frequency of suctioning. The CSS was as effective as the OSS. REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04053751.

Suction circuit flushing with chlorhexidine decreases ventilator-associated pneumonia: a quasi-experimental study.

Background: Endotracheal suctioning of mechanically ventilated patients differs across the world. In many low and middle-income countries, endotracheal suctioning is often performed with a sterile suctioning catheter that is used for 12 h or during the length of one nursing shift. The effect of flushing multiple used endotracheal suction system with chlorhexidine after suctioning to reduce ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) remains unclear. Aim: The aim of the study is to assess the effectiveness of flushing multiple-used open endotracheal suction catheters and suctioning system with chlorhexidine gluconate 0.2% to reduce VAP in mechanically ventilated patients in a resource-limited Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Methods: Due to the difficulty of blinding the intervention for nurses who perform endo-tracheal suction procedures, we adopted a quasi-experimental method with a randomized controlled trial design. A sample of 136 ICU patients were allocated to the intervention (n = 68) or control group (n = 68) between May and November 2020. The intervention was flushing the multiple-used suction catheter and suction system with 40ml chlorhexidine gluconate 0.2% and in the control group we used normal saline to flush the catheter and suction system. The primary outcome was incidence of VAP and the cost of the flushing solutions was the secondary outcome measure. Results: Patients in the intervention group had a lower incidence of VAP compared to patients in the control group; 15 (22.1%) vs 29 (42.6%), p = 0.01. The incidence of late-onset VAP was 26.2% in the intervention group and 49% in the control group (p = 0.026) and the early-onset VAP was 13.2% in the intervention group and 25% in the control group (p = 0.081). Chlorhexidine gluconate 0.2% reduced the cost of suction system flushing (median: 78.4 vs 300 EGP, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Using chlorhexidine gluconate 0.2% to flush multiple-used suctioning catheters after every endo-tracheal suction procedure might reduce the incidence of VAP in mechanically ventilated patients. Chlorhexidine gluconate 0.2% can be a cost-effective solution for flushing the suction circuit. Nurses working in resource-limited ICUs and using suctioning catheters multiple times might consider using chlorhexidine gluconate 0.2% instead of normal saline or distilled water when flushing the suction system. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT05206721.

Evaluation of tracheostomy suctioning procedure among nursing and respiratory therapy students: wearable manikin vs. standard manikin.

Introduction: This study aims to evaluate cognitive load (CL), emotional levels (EL), and stress levels (SL) of students when using a wearable manikin vs. a standard manikin for tracheostomy suctioning (TS). Methods: This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board. Subjects were recruited by email. Subjects completed a baseline demographics questionnaire, then they were randomized into two groups: wearable manikin group (WMG) or standard manikin group (SMG). For the WMG, an actor simulated a patient by wearing the device. In phase I, both groups were educated on how to perform TS by video and offered hands-on practice. Then I put through a tracheostomy suctioning clinical simulation and completed a post sim-survey. In phase II, the same survey was repeated after encountering a real patient as part of their clinical rotation. Results: A total of 30 subjects with a mean age 26.0 ± 5.5 years participated. 20 (66.7%) were respiratory care students and 10 (33.3%) were nursing students. In the WMG, the median stress level dropped significantly post phase II compared to post phase I [2(1,4) vs.3(1,5), p = 0.04]. There were no significant changes in median CL, confidence, and satisfaction levels between post phase II and post phase I (p > 0.05). In the SMG, the satisfaction level increased significantly post phase II compared to post phase I [5(4,5) vs.4(2,5), p = 0.004], but there were no significant changes in CL, SL, and confidence levels between post phase I and phase II. There was no significant difference in mean EL scores over time and these changes did not differ by group. Subjects in the WMG showed a higher mean competency score than those in the SMG (85.5 ± 13.6 vs. 78.5 ± 20.8, p = 0.14, Cohen's d = 0.4), yet not significant. Conclusion: Our results showed that the WMG is beneficial in helping bridge the gap of learning TS from the sim setting to the real-world clinical setting. More studies with higher sample size and use of other CL scales that assesses the different types of CL are needed to validate our findings.