Not all types of depressed patients who persist with their antidepressant treatment improve in side effect complaints: A comparison of treatment completers and dropouts in the STAR*D trial.

INTRODUCTION: There is a "traditional belief" that antidepressant side effect complaints improve with medication persistence; however, support for this theory has remained inconclusive. We aimed to examine if side effect complaints improved over time by modeling the relationship between side effect complaints and time at dropout for patients receiving citalopram during the first level of acute treatment in the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) trial. METHODS: We categorized the 2833 patients into five patterns by week of dropout. We used pattern-mixture modeling to model change in side effect complaints (frequency, intensity, and burden) over the 12-week course of treatment, while accounting for attrition and depressive severity. Using post-hoc linear contrasts, we compared the attrition patterns with the completers' pattern for severity of side effect complaints at each respective last visit prior to dropout as well as averaged side effect complaints across the duration of treatment. We also reported frequencies and tolerability of side effects for nine organ/function systems over the course of treatment. RESULTS: Patients who dropped out early exhibited worsening side effect burden and patients who dropped out later showed improvements in side effect frequency and intensity. Treatment completers improved in all side effect complaints over the course of treatment. Early attrition patterns had more severe side effect complaints for both tests of post-hoc linear contrasts than later attrition patterns and completers. CONCLUSIONS: Side effect complaints from antidepressant treatment improve over time, but only for some types of patients. As a precaution for early dropout, clinicians should monitor patients who exhibit worsening and more severe side effect complaints-especially in the first 6 weeks of antidepressant treatment. In addition, clinicians may want to consider changing the type of treatment early on for these patients, rather than encouraging them to persist with their current medication.

Bi-weekly irinotecan is an effective and convenient regimen in the treatment of relapsed or refractory small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Despite initial dramatic responses, metastatic small cell lung cancer (SCLC) invariably recurs. Irinotecan is one of the active agents for patients with recurrent SCLC. In the second line, weekly or three-weekly irinotecan regimens have been adopted, however, the optimal dose and schedule is not defined. In our institution, we use a bi-weekly regimen of irinotecan. In this study, we aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of the bi-weekly irinotecan in the second- or third-line treatment of SCLC patients. METHODS: The study population consisted of advanced stage SCLC patients who were followed at Hacettepe University Cancer Institute between January 2007 and March 2021 and received salvage irinotecan 180 mg/m2 every two weeks, following progression after platinum-etoposide treatment. RESULTS: One hundred patients were included. At diagnosis, nineteen patients (19%) had limited stage and 81 patients (81%) had extensive stage SCLC. Objective response rates (ORR) were 44.6% and 46.2% for patients who received irinotecan treatment in second line, and in third line, respectively. Seventeen percent of all the patients had grade 3 and above adverse events during irinotecan treatment. In our study, 45.8% of patients were able to complete at least 6 cycles of irinotecan treatment and 69.8% were able to receive at least 3 cycles of irinotecan treatment without any dose interruption or reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Irinotecan 180 mg/m2 every two weeks appears to be safe and effective in the 2nd- and 3rd-line treatment of advanced stage SCLC. Bi-weekly administration allows G-CSF prophylaxis in between doses, leading to an uninterrupted administration.

Advancing patient-centric care: integrating patient reported outcomes for tolerability assessment in early phase clinical trials - insights from an expert virtual roundtable.

Early phase clinical trials provide an initial evaluation of therapies' risks and benefits to patients, including safety and tolerability, which typically relies on reporting outcomes by investigator and laboratory assessments. Use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to inform risks (tolerability) and benefits (improvement in disease symptoms) is more common in later than early phase trials. We convened a two-day expert roundtable covering: (1) the necessity and feasibility of a universal PRO core conceptual model for early phase trials; (2) the practical integration of PROs in early phase trials to inform tolerability assessment, guide dose decisions, or as real-time safety alerts to enhance investigator-reported adverse events. Participants (n = 22) included: patient advocates, regulators, clinicians, statisticians, pharmaceutical representatives, and PRO methodologists working across diverse clinical areas. In this manuscript, we report major recommendations resulting from the roundtable discussions corresponding to each theme. Additionally, we highlight priority areas necessitating further investigation.

Comparative efficacy and safety of different pharmacological therapies to medication overuse headache: a network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists whether prophylactic drugs are necessary in the treatment of medication overuse headache (MOH). OBJECTIVES: To determine comparative benefits and safety of available drugs for the treatment of MOH including elimination of medication overuse (MO). METHODS: We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials though an extensive literature search comparing different drug effects on MOH. A random-effect network meta-analysis was conducted to rank comparative effects of interventions. Outcome improvements from baseline include responder rate defined as ≥ 50% reduction of headache frequency, proportion of patients who revert to no acute medication overuse (nMO), and reduction in monthly headache and acute medication intake frequency. Certainty of evidence was classified using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development & Evaluation (GRADE). RESULTS: Of 8,248 screened publications, 28 were eligible for analysis. Topiramate was found to be beneficial based on its responder rate (odds ratios [OR] 4.93), headache frequency (weighted mean difference [WMD] -5.53) and acute medication intake frequency (WMD - 6.95), with fewer safety issues (i.e., tolerability, or more adverse events) than placebo (OR 0.20). Fremanezumab, galcanezumab and botulinum toxin type A (BTA) were beneficial for increased responder rates (OR 3.46 to 3.07, 2.95, and 2.57, respectively). For reversion to nMO, eptinezumab, fremanezumab and BTA were superior to placebo (OR 2.75 to 2.64, 1.87 to1.57, and 1.55, respectively). Eptinezumab, fremanezumab, erenumab 140 mg, and BTA were more efficacious than erenumab 70 mg (OR 3.84 to 3.70, 2.60 to 2.49, 2.44 and 2.16, respectively) without differences in safety and tolerability. CONCLUSION: Despite lower safety and greater intolerability issues, topiramate has large beneficial effects probably on increasing responder rates, reducing headache frequency, and might reduce monthly medication intake frequency. Fremanezumab, galcanezumab, and eptinezumab are promising for increasing responder rates. For reversion to nMO, eptinezumab has large beneficial effects, fremanezumab has a smaller effect. BTA might have a moderate effect on responder rates and probably has a small effect on reversion to nMO. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42021193370.

Subcutaneous and orally self-administered high-dose carprofen shows favorable pharmacokinetic and tolerability profiles in male and female C57BL/6J mice.

Introduction: Surgical interventions in mice require appropriate pain relief to ensure animal welfare and to avoid influence of pain on research findings. Carprofen is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug commonly used as an analgesic for interventions inducing mild to moderate pain in laboratory rodents. Despite its frequent use, species-specific data on pharmacokinetics (PK), side effects, and potential impact on behavioral pain indicators are limited. Methods: We determined PK and tolerability profiles of carprofen in healthy male and female C57BL/6J mice (n = 42), administered at highest recommended doses via single subcutaneous (s.c.) injection (20 mg/kg) and oral self-administration (25 mg/kg/24 h) per drinking water (d.w.) for 5 days. Plasma concentrations were measured at various time points after the start of the treatment (n = 6 per time point), and side effects were evaluated using a modified Irwin test battery, hematology, and histopathology. Additionally, potential interference with cage-side behaviors commonly used for pain assessment, such as the mouse grimace scale, wheel running, burrowing, nesting, and grooming activity, was investigated. Results: Maximum plasma concentrations of 133.4 ± 11.3 µg/ml were reached 1 h after single s.c. injection with an elimination half-life of 8.52 h. Intake from d.w. resulted in a steady state within 24 h after the start of the treatment with plasma levels of around 60 µg/ml over 5 days in both sexes. The medicated water was well-accepted, and increased d.w. intake was observed in the first 24 h after exposure (p < 0.0001). The Irwin test revealed only minor influence on tested behavior and physiological functions. However, during treatment via d.w., an increase in body temperature (p < 0.0001) was observed, as well as a reduction in voluntary wheel running activity by 49-70% in male mice. Moreover, grooming behavior was slightly affected. Hematology and histopathology were without pathological findings that could be attributed to carprofen treatment. High-dose carprofen can be considered safe and of favorable PK for both administration routes assessed in healthy C57BL/6J mice of both sexes. Further efficacy evaluation of carprofen as monoanalgesic or component of multimodal post-surgical regimens is clearly encouraged; however, the impact on behavioral markers used for pain assessment should be considered in this context.

Short-term safety and tolerability profile of 5-methoxy-N,N-dimethyltryptamine in human subjects: a systematic review of clinical trials.

Introduction: Psychedelic agents have regained the attention of pharmaceutical companies as promising treatments for depressive episodes. 5-Methoxy-N,N-dimethyltryptamine (5-MeO-DMT), an atypical psychedelic, is emerging as a potentially effective, novel rapid-acting antidepressant. In this systematic review, we analyze the safety and tolerability evidence from clinical trials. Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, electronic databases (PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, EMBASE, and EBSCO) were searched from inception until 15 May 2024 to identify clinical trials (regardless of phase) reporting on short-term safety and tolerability profile of 5-MeO-DMT using the following keywords in various combinations: 5-methoxy-N, N-dimethyltryptamine, 5-MeO-DMT, safety, adverse, adverse reaction, side effects, tolerability, dropout, healthy volunteer, healthy participant, depression, major depressive disorder. Only studies written in English were considered. Results: Initial search yielded 100 records, out of which 3 met the inclusion criteria. These studies reported on the results from clinical trial phases I and I/II, with a total of 78 participants included; two studies involved healthy volunteers, and one included patients with treatment-resistant depression. Although the data is limited, it confirms a good short-term safety and tolerability profile for 5-MeO-DMT, with no serious adverse events (SAEs) reported. Furthermore, no drop-outs were reported. Conclusion: 5-MeO-DMT administration in human subjects presents favorable short-term safety and tolerability profile. Importantly, no SAEs have been documented, and no adverse events led to participant withdrawal from the studies There is a need for future randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials with larger samples and follow-up to assess potential chronic adverse events.

Impact of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetic profile of intravenous difelikefalin, a kappa opioid receptor agonist for the treatment of pruritus.

BACKGROUND: Difelikefalin is a selective kappa opioid receptor agonist that is approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe pruritus associated with chronic kidney disease in adults undergoing hemodialysis (HD). In this study, we assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK) of intravenous (IV) difelikefalin in healthy subjects, in non-dialysis-dependent (NDD) subjects with varying stages of kidney disease, and in subjects with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing HD. METHODS: The PK and safety of single IV doses of difelikefalin (3.0 mcg/kg) were initially evaluated in NDD subjects with mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment compared with matched healthy subjects. Based on those data, the PK and safety of 3 dose levels of IV difelikefalin (0.5, 1.0, or 2.5 mcg/kg) were compared with matched placebo in subjects undergoing HD with each dose administered following dialysis, 3 times over a 1-week treatment period). RESULTS: Single IV dosing of difelikefalin in NDD subjects (N = 36) with mild renal impairment demonstrated comparable exposure to healthy subjects with normal renal function, while subjects with moderate or severe renal impairment had higher total exposure. NDD subjects with severe renal impairment had higher total exposure compared with those with moderate renal impairment (i.e., exposure in severe NDD > moderate NDD > mild NDD ≈ healthy subjects). Clearance of difelikefalin correspondingly decreased with increasing renal impairment. In the multiple-dose study in subjects with ESRD undergoing HD (N = 19), IV difelikefalin demonstrated dose proportionality and was shown to be mostly cleared by dialysis; steady state was achieved with the second dose on day 3. Safety findings for all subjects were consistent with the known profile of IV difelikefalin. CONCLUSIONS: IV difelikefalin was well tolerated. Similar exposure was observed in NDD subjects with mild renal impairment compared with healthy subjects with normal renal function, with reduced clearance and higher exposure in NDD subjects with moderate or severe renal impairment. Dose proportionality was demonstrated in subjects with ESRD undergoing HD administered IV difelikefalin 3 times per week following dialysis and was shown to be mostly cleared by dialysis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Single-dose study: NA; multiple-dose study: ClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT02229929, first registration 03/09/2014.

Retrospective evaluation of adjuvant capecitabine dosing patterns in triple negative breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The CREATE-X trial demonstrated that adjuvant capecitabine was effective in prolonging survival in high-risk triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients. However, the recommended dose is generally not well tolerated by the US population. The goal of this study is to analyze dosing patterns in an ethnically diverse cohort to better characterize tolerability and inform future dosing guidelines. METHODS: In our single-center retrospective study, we evaluated safety and tolerability in TNBC patients undergoing adjuvant capecitabine treatment. The primary endpoint, relative dose intensity (RDI) across eight cycles, was examined alongside subgroup analyses based on age, race, BMI, and initial dose. Secondary endpoints include capecitabine-related side effects and survival. RESULTS: 67 patients who completed adjuvant capecitabine at University of Chicago Medicine (UCM) between January 2017 and November 2022 were eligible. The mean RDI across eight cycles of treatment was 60.2% (95% CI: 0.554-0.650). When compared to the CREATE-X trial, the RDI in our population was significantly lower (0.602 vs. 0.787, p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in average RDI across eight cycles for patients stratified by age, BMI, race, or initial starting dose. The most frequently reported adverse events were hand-foot syndrome (73%), diarrhea (27%), and fatigue (22%), consistent with prior studies. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrates that a significant portion of patients have a lower tolerated dose of capecitabine in comparison to the recommended adjuvant dose. Acknowledging the limitations of our single-center analysis, RDI was not significantly affected by age, race, BMI, or initial starting dose.

New calcimimetics for secondary hyperparathyroidism in CKD G5D: do they offer advantages?

Secondary hyperparathyroidism is one of the most frequent metabolic abnormalities found in patients with chronic kidney disease. The calcium-sensing receptor senses extracellular calcium and is the principal regulator of parathyroid hormone secretion. Cloning of the calcium-sensing receptor led to the development of calcimimetics, drugs that decrease parathyroid hormone secretion through the positive allosteric modulation of this receptor. Cinacalcet was the first oral calcimimetic approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2004 for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in adult patients on dialysis. Although cinacalcet has demonstrated safety and effectiveness, it has two main problems: gastrointestinal side effects that result in poor adherence, and the inhibitory action on CYP2D6 with the possibility of interactions with commonly used medications. To address the problem of oral compliance, Etelcalcetide, a small synthetic polycationic peptide IV calcimimetic was introduced in 2017. This drug showed a 10% greater decrease in serum parathyroid hormone values compared to cinacalcet but no better gastrointestinal tolerance, with greater risk of hypocalcemia. Several structural modifications were introduced in cinacalcet to produce a new compound called evocalcet. This drug, which was introduced in Japan in 2018, has considerably enhanced bioavailability and decreased both the inhibitory effect on CYP2D6 and half of the gastrointestinal side effects of cinacalcet. Finally, a novel non-peptidic injectable calcimimetic agent, upacicalcet, became available in Japan in 2021. This agent has greater clearance by hemodialysis and shows no effect on gastric emptying. More studies are needed comparing the old calcimimetics to the new ones to establish their future role in the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in chronic kidney disease (CKD) G5D.

The Outcome of Octogenarian Patients with Multiple Myeloma Treated Outside Clinical Studies, Focusing on Tolerability and Efficacy of Treatment.

Background: Data on the outcome of octogenarian multiple myeloma (MM) patients (pts), especially if treated outside clinical studies, are scanty. Aims and Methods: MM pts ≥ 80 years, treated at TASMC with first-line therapy between 2010 and 2023, were reviewed. Characteristics and outcomes were analyzed. Results: A total number of 101 pts, of whom 54 were males with a median age of 84 years (80-98), were included. Among them, 67.4% had a Charlson comorbidity index of ≥5, 37% had ISS-3 (International staging system) and 20% had Revised-ISS-3. In our study, 44.5% received doublets and 50.5% received triplets/quadruplets. A bortezomib-based regimen was applied in 87%, and IMiDs were used in 27.7%. Despite an upfront employment of a low lenalidomide dose, dose reductions were required in 48%. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) (mainly infections) were documented in 36.6% of patients, including grade 5 events in 9%, all attributed to infections. The overall response rate was 69%, including 31% ≥ VGPRs (Very good partial response). Sixty-seven percent (67%) received second-line therapy, administered within a median period of 12 months (1-84). Within a median follow-up period of 36 m (1-141), the median overall survival (OS) approached 42 m (range: 1-141); being shorter in pts > 84 years (HR = 1.7, p = 0.03), pts with lung disease (HR = 1.8, p = 0.044) and pts with ISS = 3 and R-ISS = 3 (HR = 1.65, p = 0.0016 and HR = 2.45, p = 0.006, respectively); Conclusions: Octogenarians treated outside clinical studies often have a lower tolerance to treatment. Nevertheless, upfront administration of low doses of anti-MM agents provided a response in the majority of patients, translated into impressive OS. Nevertheless, mortality due to AEs was high, emphasizing the need for new, "octogenarian-oriented" treatment protocols.

Tolerability and Safety of Miltefosine for the Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis.

Miltefosine, an orally administered drug, is an important component of the therapeutic arsenal against visceral and mucosal forms of leishmaniasis. However, data regarding the safety and tolerability of miltefosine treatment for cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) are relatively limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the tolerability, safety, and adverse events (AEs) of miltefosine treatment in patients with CL. In this cohort study, we reviewed the medical records of all miltefosine-treated patients between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2022, at Israel Defense Forces military dermatology clinics and the dermatology and Tropical Medicine Clinics at Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel. A total of 68 patients (54 males, 79%) with a median age of 30.3 ± 15.6 years (range: 18-88) were included in this study. Leishmania species were identified as L. major (n = 37, 54.4%), L. tropica (n = 12, 17.6%), L. braziliensis (n = 18, 26.5%), and L. infantum (n = 1, 1.5%) using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Miltefosine tablets were administered orally at a dose of 50 mg, three times daily, for 28 days. Overall, 44 patients (65%) completed the 28-day treatment, and the remaining patients required dose reduction or early discontinuation of treatment. AEs (of any degree) were common, reported in 91% of patients. Both previously reported and previously unreported AEs were documented. Gastrointestinal symptoms (66.1%) and malaise (23.5%) typically occurred during the first two weeks of treatment and tended to subside. Other AEs, including acute renal failure (20.6%), sudden and severe pleuritic chest pain (7.6%), acne exacerbation (11.8%), suppuration of CL lesions (17.8%), and AEs related to the male genitourinary system (39.6% of males), typically occurred towards the end of treatment. The latter included testicular pain, epididymitis, diminution or complete absence of ejaculate, inability to orgasm, and impotence. Severe AEs necessitated treatment discontinuation (29.4%) or hospitalization (10.3%). URTI-like symptoms, arthritis, cutaneous eruption, pruritus, and laboratory abnormalities were also observed. Overall, the cure rate (for all patients combined) evaluated 3 months after the completion of treatment was 60%. The tolerability of miltefosine treatment for CL is low. Close clinical and laboratory monitoring is required during treatment, as severe AEs are not uncommon. As new insights regarding its toxicities emerge, further studies are required to define the role of miltefosine in the treatment of CL.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Weekly GLP-1/GIP Agonists vs. Weekly Insulin in Type 2 Diabetes: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM) significantly impacts global health due to its complications and the economic burden it places on healthcare systems. The rise of novel once-weekly diabetes medications with different mechanisms of action necessitates an evaluation of their relative efficacy and safety. OBJECTIVES: This study compares the efficacy and tolerability of once-weekly insulin analogs (icodec and BIF) with once-weekly GLP-1/GIP agonists (semaglutide, exenatide, tirzepatide, dulaglutide) in managing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: We conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) using data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared these treatments with a baseline of daily basal insulin. Primary outcomes included changes in HbA1c, body weight, and tolerability. RESULTS: The analysis integrated data from 25 RCTs, involving 18,257 patients. Tirzepatide significantly outperformed other treatments in reducing HbA1c and promoting weight loss. Weekly insulins, compared to GLP-1/GIP agonists, showed a more tolerable profile and were beneficial for certain patient demographics emphasizing weight stability. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that while once-weekly GLP-1/GIP agonists provide superior glycemic control and weight management, weekly insulins offer viable options for patients prioritizing fewer side effects and weight stability. This comprehensive comparison aids in refining personalized treatment strategies for T2DM management.

Penile compression devices for the treatment of urinary incontinence: current status and future prospects.

INTRODUCTION: Urinary incontinence (UI), especially stress UI, is common after prostatectomy. Penile compression devices (PCDs) may be a safe, tolerable option for conservative management in men who are not candidates for or not interested in surgical intervention for their UI. AREAS COVERED: This article examines the epidemiology of post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence (PPI), and options for management. All available studies on PCDs are explored, including those on biomechanics, safety, tolerability, and user experience. History, availability of PCDs, and areas for future development are discussed. EXPERT OPINION: PCDs are an option for conservative management of PPI. They are recommended for those men without impairment in cognition, dexterity, or sensation. They should be worn for short periods of time and are best used during situations when incontinence might be precipitated. Overall, data suggest they are well tolerated and effective when tested, but large randomized comparative trials and studies of long-term use with relevant patient reported outcome measures are lacking. More studies are needed on commercially available PCDs. Biomechanical studies suggest that there are superior designs and materials both for efficacy and tolerability. With an aging population, and more older men going for prostate surgery, a larger market for these devices is likely.

First real-world study on the effectiveness and tolerability of rimegepant for acute migraine therapy in Chinese patients.

BACKGROUND: Rimegepant, a small molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist, is indicated for acute and preventive migraine treatment in the United States and other countries. However, there is a lack of prospective real-world evidence for the use of rimegepant in Chinese migraine patients. METHODS: This was a single-arm, prospective, real-world study. While taking rimegepant to treat migraine attacks as needed, eligible participants were asked to record their pain intensity, functional ability, and accompanying symptoms for a single attack at predose and 0.5, 1, 2, 24, and 48 h postdose via a digital platform. Adverse events (AEs) during the rimegepant treatment period were recorded and analysed. The percentages of participants who experienced moderate to severe pain at predose and 0.5, 1, 2, 24, and 48 h postdose were assessed. Additionally, the percentages of participants who reported better/good outcomes in terms of pain intensity, functional ability, and accompanying symptoms at 0.5, 1, 2, 24, and 48 h postdose were analysed. In addition, the total cohort (full population, FP) was stratified into a prior nonresponder (PNR) group to observe the effectiveness and safety of rimegepant for relatively refractory migraine and a rimegepant and eptinezumab (RE) group to observe the effectiveness and safety of the combination of these drugs. RESULTS: By November 24th, 2023, 133 participants (FP, n = 133; PNR group, n = 40; RE group, n = 28) were enrolled, and 99 participants (FP, n = 99; PNR group, n = 30; RE group, n = 23) were included in the analysis. Rimegepant was effective in treating migraine in the FP and both subgroups, with a significant decreasing trend in the percentages of participants experiencing moderate to severe pain postdose (p < 0.05) and a marked increase in the percentages of participants who reported better/good outcomes in terms of pain intensity, functional ability, and accompanying symptoms at 0.5, 1, 2, 24, and 48 h postdose compared with predose. AEs were reported by 6% of participants in the FP, and all AEs were mild. CONCLUSIONS: In the real world, rimegepant is effective in the acute treatment of migraine patients in China. The low incidence rate of AEs highlighted the favourable tolerability profile of rimegepant. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05709106. Retrospectively registered on 2023-02-01.

Menopause and its impact on the effectiveness of fremanezumab for migraine prophylaxis: post-hoc analysis of a prospective, real-world Greek registry.

OBJECTIVE: This post-hoc analysis of data extracted from a prospective study aimed to explore for the first time if the efficacy of fremanezumab in preventing difficult-to-treat migraine, according to ICHD-III, would differ between pre-menopausal and post-menopausal women. METHODS: A total of 171 (aged 18-70 years) fremanezumab-treated female migraine patients for six consecutive months were classified to those at pre-menopausal (n = 82) or post-menopausal (n = 89). Monthly headache days (MHD), disability, and quality of life (QOL) outcomes were assessed at baseline and at week 24 post-fremanezumab within subgroups and were then compared between them. Safety and tolerability were also assessed. RESULTS: In both groups, fremanezumab demonstrated significant reductions in MHDs, reduced disability, and higher QOL scores at week 24 post-treatment, compared to baseline. However, the between-subgroup comparison documented that pre-menopausal women and those at post-menopausal comparably benefited with significant reductions in overall MHDs (p = 0.883). Less disability, according to MIDAS (p = 0.696) and HIT-6 scores (p = 0.912), as well as higher QOL scores at week 24 post-fremanezumab, were also comparably evident in both groups. Safety was excellent across both subgroups. CONCLUSION: Fremanezumab can be considered a very effective treatment option for preventing migraines in difficult-to-treat women, aged 18-70 years, regardless of their menopausal status.

Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Psychedelics in Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD).

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a highly prevalent psychiatric disorder, associated with substantial burden and large economical costs. Notwithstanding various conventional antidepressant treatment options, a large portion of depressed people (ca. 30%) fails to respond to first-line treatment, resulting in treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Although non-response to multiple antidepressant interventions is a common outcome, a consensus definition of TRD is not yet available. In practice, TRD is applied when two or more successive treatments with different antidepressants are not working. The last decade's intense research into new medicines for TRD has led to two developments, using typical or serotonergic (psilocybin, ayahuasca) and atypical (glutamatergic) psychedelics (ketamine, esketamine). Both approaches, although via different entrance mechanism, exhibit a fast onset but also long-lasting antidepressant effect far beyond the biological presence of the drug in the body, strongly indicating that downstream mechanisms activated by signaling cascades in the brain are involved. The present chapter describes the clinical development of psilocybin and esketamine for TRD and discusses the problems involved in the use of a proper placebo because of the psychotomimetic (psilocybin) or dissociative (ketamine) effects that interfere with performing "blind" studies. Nevertheless, intranasal esketamine was developed and approved for TRD, whereas psilocybin has shown positive results. Adverse effects and tolerability of both drugs in the dose ranges used are generally acceptable. The emergence of anti-TRD medicines for treatment of a very severe disease is a breakthrough in psychiatry.

Phase 1 trial of an investigational Tdap booster vaccine with CpG 1018 adjuvant compared with Boostrix in healthy adults and adolescents.

This phase 1 trial assessed the safety and immunogenicity of an investigational tetanus/diphtheria/acellular pertussis vaccine combined with CpG 1018 adjuvant 1500 µg (Tdap-1018 1500 µg) or 3000 µg (Tdap-1018 3000 µg) in adults and adolescents. In this randomized, active-controlled, multicenter, dose-escalation trial, healthy participants aged 10 to 22 years received 1 dose of Tdap-1018 1500 µg, Tdap-1018 3000 µg, or Boostrix. Geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) and booster response rates (BRRs) for antibodies against pertussis (pertussis toxin, filamentous hemagglutinin, pertactin), tetanus, and diphtheria antigens, and neutralizing antibodies against pertussis toxin were assessed 4 weeks after vaccination. Safety and tolerability were assessed for solicited post-injection reactions within 7 days after vaccination and unsolicited adverse events up to 12 weeks after vaccination. Of 117 enrolled participants, 80 adults (92%) and 30 adolescents (100%) completed the study. Both Tdap-1018 formulations were generally well tolerated, with no vaccine-related serious adverse events. Frequency and severity in post-injection reactions after Tdap-1018 administration were similar to Boostrix except for higher proportions of moderate pain for Tdap-1018. In adults at week 4, ratio of GMCs and BRRs for all antigens in the 3000-µg group were similar to or higher than Boostrix, with significantly higher GMC ratios for anti-pertussis toxin (2.1 [1.5-3.0]) and anti-tetanus (1.8 [1.1-2.9]) and significantly higher BRRs for anti-pertussis toxin (difference [95% CI]: 34.5% [13.4-54.6]), anti-pertactin (19.2% [4.4-38.1]), and anti-tetanus (30.0% [3.6-52.7]) antibodies. For adolescents, in the 3000-µg group, ratio of GMCs and BRRs were similar to or higher than Boostrix for all antigens. Both Tdap-1018 formulations showed acceptable safety and tolerability profiles. Tdap-1018 3000 µg induced similar or higher immune responses than Boostrix. ACTRN12620001177943 (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry; https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=ACTRN12620001177943p).

Assessment of prolonged safety and tolerability of erenumab in migraine patients in a long-term open-label study (APOLLON).

BACKGROUND: Efficacy and safety of human monoclonal antibody erenumab used for migraine prophylaxis have been shown in clinical studies. APOLLON is an open-label, multi-center, single arm study, which permits dose adjustments of erenumab and includes an option for a drug holiday. The findings contribute to the accumulating long-term evidence regarding erenumab's tolerability and safety profile in individuals experiencing episodic and chronic migraines. METHODS: The study population consisted of adult patients with episodic or chronic migraine, who had successfully completed the HER-MES study (NCT03828539). Patients were treated with erenumab for 128 weeks at a flexible dose of either 70 mg or 140 mg. Treatment discontinuation attempts were allowed as voluntary single treatment interruption ('drug holiday') of up to 24 weeks. RESULTS: 701 patients were enrolled in APOLLON. The exposure associated incidence rate (EAIR) of adverse events (AEs) (N = 601) per 100 subject years was 101.71 (95% CI [92.28; 111.14]) meaning a patient could expect having about one adverse event per each year of treatment. EAIR was higher in females (n = 524, EAIR: 104.40, 95% CI [93.93; 114.86]) than in males (n = 77, EAIR: 86.55, 95% CI [65.39; 107.71]) and increased with initial monthly migraine days (MMD) and prior prophylactic treatment failures. A total of 155 patients discontinued erenumab treatment during open-label treatment phase. Of these, 29 were due to AEs (4.1% of total cohort) and out of these 65.5% (N = 19) were considered treatment-related. Safety parameters were in line with HER-MES data and did not reveal new safety signals. Drug holidays were realized by 108 patients (15.4%), of which 64.8% (N = 70) returned to treatment. The mean number of monthly headache days (MHDs), MMDs, and days with acute headache medication significantly increased during drug holiday. After resumption of erenumab treatment, a rapid reduction of the migraine parameters was observed. CONCLUSIONS: APOLLON provides long-term safety and tolerability data confirming the beneficial safety profile of erenumab over a period of 128 weeks. In addition, reversibility of migraine deterioration during drug holiday was shown and most patients returned to their treatment with similar response rates compared to initial treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04084314 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04084314 ), First submitted: 2019-09-06.

MEDI1814 selectively reduces free Aß42 in cerebrospinal fluid of non-clinical species and Alzheimer's disease patients.

INTRODUCTION: Small molecules and antibodies are being developed to lower amyloid beta (Aß) peptides. METHODS: We describe MEDI1814, a fully human high-affinity monoclonal antibody selective for Aß42, the pathogenic self-aggregating species of Aß. RESULTS: MEDI1814 reduces free Aß42 without impacting Aß40 in the cerebrospinal fluid of rats and cynomolgus monkeys after systemic administration. MEDI1814 administration to patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD; n = 57) in single or repeat doses up to 1800 mg intravenously or 200 mg subcutaneously was associated with a favorable safety and tolerability profile. No cases of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities were observed. Predictable dose-proportional changes in serum exposures for MEDI1814 were observed across cohorts. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis demonstrated central nervous system penetration of MEDI1814. Pharmacodynamic data showed dose-dependent suppression of free Aß42, increases in total (bound and free) Aß42, but no change in total Aß40 in CSF across doses. DISCUSSION: MEDI1814 offers a differentiated approach to impacting Aß in AD via selective reduction of free Aß42.

Effects of exercise therapy on chemotherapy delivery and response in primary breast cancer: A secondary analysis of a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Whether structured exercise therapy improves chemotherapy delivery, tolerability, and tumor response is unclear. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of a phase 2 trial investigating exercise therapy (n = 72) versus usual care (n = 72) in patients with primary breast cancer. Exercise therapy comprised individualized treadmill walking three times weekly for 20-50 minutes per session at 55%-100% of pretreatment exercise capacity. Chemotherapy delivery was assessed according to the relative dose intensity (RDI), tolerability was assessed according to patient-reported outcomes and blood laboratory values, and response was assessed based on the pathologic complete response rate in patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: In the exercise therapy group, 51 patients (71%) reached 100% RDI (median, 100%; interquartile range, 100%-100%) compared with 41 patients (57%) in the usual care group (median, 100%; interquartile range, 95%-100%; p = .08). Tolerability was similar in both groups; the rates of grade 3 or higher neutropenia and anemia were 22% versus 39% and 7% versus 10% in the exercise and usual care groups, respectively. In patients who received anthracyclines (n = 104), 41 (77%) had 100% chemotherapy RDI in the exercise therapy group versus 29 (57%) in the usual care group (p = .026). In the neoadjuvant chemotherapy subgroup (n = 51 tumors), the postneoadjuvant therapy (yp) pathologic complete response (ypT0ypN0) rate was 27% (95% confidence interval, 12%-50%) in the exercise therapy group compared with 28% (95% confidence interval, 13%-47%) in the usual care group (p > .9). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with primary breast cancer, exercise therapy was associated with improved delivery of anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Although exercise therapy was not significantly associated with tumor response, effects varied by tumor subtype (trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01943695).