Genomewide copy number analysis of Müllerian adenosarcoma identified chromosomal instability in the aggressive subgroup.

Müllerian adenosarcomas are malignant gynecologic neoplasms. Advanced staging and sarcomatous overgrowth predict poor prognosis. Because the genomic landscape remains poorly understood, we conducted this study to characterize the genomewide copy number variations in adenosarcomas. Sixteen tumors, including eight with and eight without sarcomatous overgrowth, were subjected to a molecular inversion probe array analysis. Copy number variations, particularly losses, were significantly higher in cases with sarcomatous overgrowth. Frequent gains of chromosomal 12q were noted, often involving cancer-associated genes CDK4 (six cases), MDM2, CPM, YEATS4, DDIT3, GLI1 (five each), HMGA2 and STAT6 (four), without association with sarcomatous overgrowth status. The most frequent losses involved chromosomes 13q (five cases), 9p, 16q and 17q (four cases each) and were almost limited to cases with sarcomatous overgrowth. MDM2 and CDK4 amplification, as well as losses of RB1 (observed in two cases) and CDKN2A/B (one case), was verified by FISH. By immunohistochemistry, all MDM2/CDK4-coamplified cases were confirmed to overexpress both encoded proteins, whereas all four cases with (plus an additional four without) gain of HMGA2 overexpressed the HMGA2 protein. Both cases with RB1 loss were negative for the immunostaining of the encoded protein. Chromothripsis-like copy number profiles involving chromosome 12 or 14 were observed in three fatal cases, all of which harbored sarcomatous overgrowth. With whole chromosome painting and deconvolution fluorescent microscopy, dividing tumor cells in all three cases were shown to have scattered extrachromosomal materials derived from chromosomes involved by chromothripsis, suggesting that this phenomenon may serve as visual evidence for chromothripsis in paraffin tissue. In conclusion, we identified frequent chromosome 12q amplifications, including loci containing potential pharmacological targets. Global chromosomal instability and chromothripsis were more frequent in cases with sarcomatous overgrowth. To our knowledge, this is the first time that evidence of chromothripsis has been demonstrated in paraffin-embedded clinical tissues and in adenosarcomas.

Intravascular adenomyomatosis: expanding the morphologic spectrum of intravascular leiomyomatosis.

Intravascular leiomyomatosis (IVL) is characterized by the presence of smooth muscle in venous and lymphatic spaces within the myometrium. Although the intravascular component usually consists solely of typical smooth muscle or variants of smooth muscle differentiation, we report 5 cases in which the intravascular component also included endometrioid glandular and stromal elements. We propose the term "intravenous adenomyomatosis" to describe this unusual variant of IVL. The mean age of the patients in this series was 50.2 years, slightly older than that of patients with conventional IVL. In addition to intravenous adenomyomatosis, both adenomyosis and leiomyomas were identified in all of our cases, supporting the hypothesis that the intravascular smooth muscle component in IVL is derived from associated myometrial pathology rather than from vessel walls. In our series, intravenous adenomyomatosis had a similar benign clinical behavior to most cases of IVL with no metastatic or recurrent disease identified at follow-up in 4 cases for which follow-up information was available. The main differential diagnoses are adenomyosis with vascular involvement, low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS), including ESS with smooth muscle and glandular differentiation, and adenosarcoma with lymphovascular invasion. The possibility of intravenous adenomyomatosis should be borne in mind when considering these diagnoses, particularly ESS and adenosarcoma, which have different implications for patient management and prognosis.

Adenosarcoma ovarii in a 51-year-old woman: case report.

This case report presents a 51-year-old woman with an adenosarcoma of ovarian origin which is a very rare tumor. She came for consultation due to abnormal vaginal bleeding. The case also illustrates the difficulty of its correct diagnosis and discusses the possible reasons of wrong preoperative and intraoperative diagnosis.

Mullerian adenosarcomas: an immunophenotypic analysis of 35 cases.

Mullerian adenosarcomas (MAs) are rare mixed mesenchymal and epithelial neoplasms that occur most commonly in the uterus. Although the epithelial component is typically benign, the mesenchymal component of most adenosarcomas morphologically resembles that observed in endometrial stromal tumors and is responsible for their clinical behavior. Thus, the differential diagnosis usually includes not only low-grade endometrial stromal tumors, but also adenofibroma, carcinosarcoma, and embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma especially in small samples. The objective of this study was to ascertain the immunophenotypic profile of the epithelial and mesenchymal components of MAs and delineate possible differences between conventional mesenchymal areas and areas of sarcomatous overgrowth. Representative sections from 35 MAs, 28 of them without sarcomatous overgrowth (MA-NSO) and 7 with sarcomatous overgrowth (MA-SO), were included in the study. Thirty tumors arose in the uterus, 4 were pelvic, and 1 originated in the colon. Adequate blocks were selected and immunostained for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), androgen receptor (AR), CD10, WT1, smooth muscle actin, desmin, AE1/3 cytokeratin, CD34, calretinin, inhibin, c-kit, and Ki-67. The mesenchymal component expressed ER in 21/27 MA-NSOs but in only 1/7 MA-SOs (65% overall). PR was expressed in 21/26 MA-NSOs and 4/7 MA-SOs (76% overall), whereas AR was positive in 10/27 MA-NSOs and 5/7 MA-SOs (35% overall). CD10 was expressed in 23/28 MA-NSOs but in only 2/7 MA-SOs (71% overall), and WT1 positivity was seen in 22/27 MA-NSOs and 6/7 MA-SOs (79% overall). Sixty-seven percent of MAs expressed smooth muscle actin, 32% desmin, including both examples of MA-SOs with rhabdomyoblastic differentiation, and 25% expressed AE1/3 cytokeratin. CD34 expression was found in 35% of the tumors, but it was almost always patchy in distribution and weak in intensity, as was calretinin expression, seen only in 12% of the cases. Expression of c-kit and inhibin in greater than 5% of the tumor cells was not encountered. The median and mean Ki-67 labeling indices were 10% and 12%, respectively (range, <5% to 40%). The median and mean Ki-67 indices were both 5% in MA-NSOs compared with 30% and 28%, respectively, in MA-SOs. The epithelial compartment demonstrated expression for ER (24/32), PR (23/31), and AE1/3 cytokeratin (33/33); rare cases expressed CD10 (4 cases) and AR (1 case). In summary, the immunophenotype of most MAs resembled that of endometrial stromal tumors (positive for ER, PR, WT1, and CD10, with variable expression of muscle markers, AR and cytokeratin). The proliferative rate in the stromal component was strongly related to the presence of sarcomatous overgrowth. ER, PR, and CD10 expression was lost in MA-SOs relative to conventional low-grade stromal areas of mullerian/mesodermal adenosarcomas, reflecting the "dedifferentiation" of this component.

Metanephric adenosarcoma in a young adult: morphologic, immunophenotypic, ultrastructural, and fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses: a case report and review of the literature.

Metanephric neoplasms are uncommon renal tumors that arise in both children and adults. They may be composed of small epithelial cells or benign stroma, or both, and are termed metanephric adenoma, metanephric stromal tumor, or metanephric adenofibroma, respectively. Thus far, these tumors have been known for their benign behavior. We present the case of a 21-year-old woman who developed a neoplasm composed of a renal epithelial component identical to metanephric adenoma combined with a malignant spindle cell sarcoma. The epithelial component was positive for pankeratin AE1/3, whereas the sarcomatous component was negative for epithelial markers and positive for vimentin, CD34, and CD117. No smooth muscle differentiation was apparent in the sarcoma by immunohistochemistry or ultrastructural analysis. By fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis of the sarcomatous component there was monosomy of the X chromosome, but no apparent variation from the normal diploid pattern for chromosomes 3, 7, 12, and 17. We conclude that the spectrum of metanephric neoplasia should be expanded to include malignant stromal variants, and we propose the term "metanephric adenosarcoma" for the present case.