Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 2.859
Filter
1.
J Exp Clin Cancer Res ; 43(1): 218, 2024 Aug 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39103871

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Glioblastoma (GBM) poses a significant challenge in oncology, with median survival times barely extending beyond a year due to resistance to standard therapies like temozolomide (TMZ). This study introduces a novel therapeutic strategy combining progesterone (Prog) and abiraterone (Abi) aimed at enhancing GBM treatment efficacy by modulating the tumor microenvironment and augmenting NK cell-mediated immunity. METHODS: We employed in vitro and in vivo GBM models to assess the effects of Prog and Abi on cell viability, proliferation, apoptosis, and the immune microenvironment. Techniques included cell viability assays, Glo-caspase 3/7 apoptosis assays, RNA-seq and qPCR for gene expression, Seahorse analysis for mitochondrial function, HPLC-MS for metabolomics analysis, and immune analysis by flow cytometry to quantify NK cell infiltration. RESULTS: Prog significantly reduced the IC50 of Abi in TMZ-resistant GBM cell, suggesting the enhanced cytotoxicity. Treatment induced greater apoptosis than either agent alone, suppressed tumor growth, and prolonged survival in mouse models. Notably, there was an increase in CD3-/CD19-/CD56+/NK1.1+ NK cell infiltration in treated tumors, indicating a shift towards an anti-tumor immune microenvironment. The combination therapy also resulted in a reduction of MGMT expression and a suppression of mitochondrial respiration and glycolysis in GBM cells. CONCLUSION: The combination of Prog and Abi represents a promising therapeutic approach for GBM, showing potential in suppressing tumor growth, extending survival, and modulating the immune microenvironment. These findings warrant further exploration into the clinical applicability of this strategy to improve outcomes for GBM patients.


Subject(s)
Glioblastoma , Killer Cells, Natural , Progesterone , Glioblastoma/drug therapy , Glioblastoma/pathology , Glioblastoma/metabolism , Glioblastoma/immunology , Humans , Mice , Animals , Killer Cells, Natural/immunology , Killer Cells, Natural/drug effects , Killer Cells, Natural/metabolism , Progesterone/pharmacology , Androstenes/pharmacology , Androstenes/therapeutic use , Cell Line, Tumor , Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays , Apoptosis/drug effects , Tumor Microenvironment/drug effects , Brain Neoplasms/drug therapy , Brain Neoplasms/immunology , Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Brain Neoplasms/metabolism , Disease Models, Animal
2.
Gynecol Endocrinol ; 40(1): 2382800, 2024 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39069793

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Progestin-only pills (POPs) have been used for contraception in breastfeeding women for years. The existing guidelines allow the use of these contraceptives. METHODS: Multicenter study with a single visit and retrospective data review. The study involved 100 women who used a drospirenone-only pill (DRSP) for contraception for at least 5 months during breastfeeding. The study aimed to analyze for those successful users the impact on new-born development, the bleeding profile and evaluate user satisfaction. RESULTS: Analysis of the newborns showed that their growth parameters length and weight, were within the expected range of standard development. The mean birth weight was 3368 g, with the lowest recorded weight being 2860 g and the highest 5040 g. The median length of the newborns was 55 cm, ranging from 35 to 65 cm. All new-borns demonstrated appropriate growth within the established percentiles. Acceptability with the bleeding profile was rated with a VAS score: the mean acceptability rating was 82.8. Women aged 35 years or older reported significantly higher acceptability compared to younger women (≥35 years: mean = 88.4, SD = 16.5; <35 years: mean = 80.3, SD = 20.2) (p = 0.02). Sixty-one patients (N = 61; 61.0%; 95% CI: 50.7 - 70.4%) expressed willingness to continue using DRSP after breastfeeding. CONCLUSION: Among those patients who continued the use of the DRSP only-pill for 5 months, this study shows no negative impact for new-borns, with no clinical influence observed on their growth. Additionally, those users expressed high satisfaction with the bleeding profile of the pill.Clinical trial registration number: DRKS00028438 .


Subject(s)
Androstenes , Breast Feeding , Humans , Female , Adult , Infant, Newborn , Retrospective Studies , Androstenes/administration & dosage , Androstenes/adverse effects , Androstenes/therapeutic use , Patient Satisfaction , Young Adult , Birth Weight/drug effects
3.
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) ; 36(9): 585-592, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39004535

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To assess toxicity and patient quality of life after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to oligoprogressive disease (OPD) in patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) on androgen receptor targeted agents (ARTA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This phase II trial enrolled patients with metastatic CRPC with ≤ 2 oligoprogressive lesions in bone, lymph node, lung, or prostate. All patients were receiving systemic treatment with abiraterone or enzalutamide at the time of oligoprogression. All patients received SBRT to the OPD site(s) and continued the current ARTA. Patients received 30 Gy in 5 fractions (alternate days) to the OPD site. The primary endpoint of the trial is to assess if SBRT to OPD sites results in progression free survival of >6 months. The primary endpoint for this toxicity analysis is the rate of grade 3 or higher adverse events at any timepoint up to 6 months after SBRT. Secondary endpoints included comparing pre- and post-SBRT patient-related outcomes reported using visual analogue scale scores and EQ-5D health questionnaire. RESULTS: Forty enrolled patients had at least 6 months of follow-up at the time of analysis. Grade 3 or higher toxicity from any cause recorded using common terminology criteria for adverse events and radiation therapy oncology group was found in 8/40 (20%) of patients, but only 1/40 (2.5%) was deemed possibly related to SBRT. There was no significant difference in mean EQ5D visual analogue scale score from baseline to each timepoint after SBRT (p = 0.449). CONCLUSION: In this prospective phase II clinical trial for OPD whilst on ARTA in the CRPC setting, we report low grade ≥ 3 toxicity after SBRT. There is no discernible change in patient-reported quality of life due to SBRT treatment. The final results of progression-free survival and toxicity of SBRT treatment will be reported once further follow-up is complete.


Subject(s)
Disease Progression , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant , Quality of Life , Radiosurgery , Humans , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/radiotherapy , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/pathology , Radiosurgery/methods , Radiosurgery/adverse effects , Aged , Middle Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Phenylthiohydantoin/therapeutic use , Nitriles/therapeutic use , Benzamides/therapeutic use , Androstenes/therapeutic use , Progression-Free Survival
4.
Clin Pharmacokinet ; 63(7): 1025-1036, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38963459

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Trough abiraterone concentration (ABI Cmin) of 8.4 ng/mL has been identified as an appropriate efficacy threshold in patients treated for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The aim of the phase II OPTIMABI study was to evaluate the efficacy of pharmacokinetics (PK)-guided dose escalation of abiraterone acetate (AA) in underexposed patients with mCRPC with early tumour progression. METHODS: This multicentre, non-randomised study consisted of two sequential steps. In step 1, all patients started treatment with 1000 mg of AA once daily. Abiraterone Cmin was measured 22-26 h after the last dose intake each month during the first 12 weeks of treatment. In step 2, underexposed patients (Cmin < 8.4 ng/mL) with tumour progression within the first 6 months of treatment were enrolled and received AA 1000 mg twice daily. The primary endpoint was the rate of non-progression at 12 weeks after the dose doubling. During step 1, adherence to ABI treatment was assessed using the Girerd self-reported questionnaire. A post-hoc analysis of pharmacokinetic (PK) data was conducted using Bayesian estimation of Cmin from samples collected outside the sampling guidelines (22-26 h). RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat analysis (ITT), 81 patients were included in step 1. In all, 21 (26%) patients were underexposed in step 1, and 8 of them (38%) experienced tumour progression within the first 6 months. A total of 71 patients (88%) completed the Girerd self-reported questionnaire. Of the patients, 62% had a score of 0, and 38% had a score of 1 or 2 (minimal compliance failure), without a significant difference in mean ABI Cmin in the two groups. Four patients were enrolled in step 2, and all reached the exposure target (Cmin > 8.4 ng/mL) after doubling the dose, but none met the primary endpoint. In the post-hoc analysis of PK data, 32 patients (39%) were underexposed, and ABI Cmin was independently associated with worse progression-free survival [hazard ratio (HR) 2.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07-5.81; p = 0.03], in contrast to the ITT analysis. CONCLUSION: The ITT and per-protocol analyses showed no statistical association between ABI underexposure and an increased risk of early tumour progression in patients with mCRPC, while the Bayesian estimator showed an association. However, other strategies than dose escalation at the time of progression need to be evaluated. Treatment adherence appeared to be uniformly good in the present study. Finally, the use of a Bayesian approach to recover samples collected outside the predefined blood collection time window could benefit the conduct of clinical trials based on drug monitoring. OPTIMABI trial is registered as National Clinical Trial number NCT03458247, with the EudraCT number 2017-000560-15).


Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant , Humans , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/pathology , Aged , Middle Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Disease Progression , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Androstenes/administration & dosage , Androstenes/pharmacokinetics , Androstenes/therapeutic use , Abiraterone Acetate/administration & dosage , Abiraterone Acetate/pharmacokinetics , Abiraterone Acetate/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/blood , Neoplasm Metastasis
5.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(7): e2419966, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38980676

ABSTRACT

Importance: The presence of bone pain is significantly associated with worse overall survival (OS) in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer. However, there are few data regarding bone pain and survival outcomes in the context of metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (MHSPC). Objective: To compare survival outcomes among patients with MHSPC by presence or absence of baseline bone pain at diagnosis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This post hoc secondary analysis, conducted from September 1 to December 31, 2023, used patient-level data from SWOG-1216, a phase 3, prospective randomized clinical trial that enrolled patients with newly diagnosed MHSPC from 248 academic and community centers across the US from March 1, 2013, to July 15, 2017. All patients in the intention-to-treat population who had available bone pain status were eligible and included in this secondary analysis. Interventions: In the SWOG-1216 trial, patients were randomized (1:1) to receive either androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with orteronel, 300 mg orally twice daily (experimental group), or ADT with bicalutamide, 50 mg orally daily (control group), until disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects, or patient withdrawal. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall survival was the primary end point; progression-free survival (PFS) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response were secondary end points. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used for both univariable and multivariable analyses adjusting for age, treatment type, Gleason score, disease volume, Zubrod performance status, and PSA level. Results: Of the 1279 male study participants, 301 (23.5%) had baseline bone pain at MHSPC diagnosis and 896 (70.1%) did not. Bone pain status was unavailable in 82 patients (6.4%). The median age of the 1197 patients eligible and included in this secondary analysis was 67.6 years (IQR, 61.8-73.6 years). Compared with patients who did not experience bone pain, those with baseline bone pain were younger (median age, 66.0 [IQR, 60.1-73.4] years vs 68.2 [IQR, 62.4-73.7] years; P = .02) and had a higher incidence of high-volume disease (212 [70.4%] vs 373 [41.6%]; P < .001). After adjustment, bone pain was associated with shorter PFS and OS. At a median follow-up of 4.0 years (IQR, 2.5-5.4 years), patients with bone pain had median PFS of 1.3 years (95% CI, 1.1-1.7 years) vs 3.7 years (95% CI, 3.3-4.2 years) in patients without initial bone pain (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 1.46; 95% CI, 1.22-1.74; P < .001) and OS of 3.9 years (95% CI, 3.3-4.8 years) vs not reached (NR) (95% CI, 6.6 years to NR) in patients without initial bone pain (AHR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.34-2.05; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this post hoc secondary analysis of the SWOG-1216 randomized clinical trial, patients with baseline bone pain at MHSPC diagnosis had worse survival outcomes than those without bone pain. These data suggest prioritizing these patients for enrollment in clinical trials, may aid patient counseling, and indicate that the inclusion of bone pain in prognostic models of MHSPC may be warranted. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01809691.


Subject(s)
Androgen Antagonists , Bone Neoplasms , Prostatic Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Aged , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Prostatic Neoplasms/mortality , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/complications , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Bone Neoplasms/secondary , Bone Neoplasms/mortality , Bone Neoplasms/complications , Bone Neoplasms/drug therapy , Nitriles/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Cancer Pain/drug therapy , Anilides/therapeutic use , Tosyl Compounds/therapeutic use , Tosyl Compounds/adverse effects , Androstenes/therapeutic use , Pain/drug therapy , Pain/etiology
6.
Anticancer Res ; 44(8): 3443-3449, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39060059

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: With new therapies for metastatic prostate cancer, patients are living longer, increasing the need for better understanding of the impact of comorbid disease. Prescription medications may risk-stratify patients independent of established methods, such as the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and guide treatment selection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a nationwide retrospective study of US Veterans, we used multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard modeling to evaluate the association between number and class of prescription medications and overall survival (OS) with age, race, body-mass index, prostate specific antigen (PSA), and Charlson comorbidities as covariates in veterans treated for de novo metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) between 2010-2021. RESULTS: Among 8,434 Veterans, a median of nine medications and five medication classes were filled in the year prior to initial treatment with abiraterone or enzalutamide for mHSPC. Veterans on 1-4 medications had an average survival of 38 months compared to 5-9 medicines (33 months), 10-14 medicines (27 months), and 15+ medicines (22 months) (p<0.001). After adjusting for age, race, body mass index (BMI), PSA, CCI, and year of diagnosis, both the number of medications and medication classes were associated with increased mortality. The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] was 1.03 (1.02-1.03) for the number of medications and 1.05 (1.04-1.07) for medication classes. Medications within ATC B (blood/blood forming organs), ATC C (cardiovascular), and ATC N (nervous) were associated with worse OS, with aHRs of 1.14 (1.07, 1.21), 1.14 (1.06, 1.22), and 1.12 (1.06, 1.19), respectively. CONCLUSION: The number and class of medications were independently associated with overall survival in patients undergoing treatment for mHSPC. With new therapies for advanced prostate cancer, patients are living longer, highlighting the need for a better understanding of the impact of comorbid diseases. Simple methods to assess disease burden and prognosticate survival have the potential to guide treatment decisions.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms/mortality , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Prescription Drugs/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Neoplasm Metastasis , Comorbidity , Veterans/statistics & numerical data , Proportional Hazards Models , Phenylthiohydantoin/therapeutic use , United States/epidemiology , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Benzamides/therapeutic use , Nitriles/therapeutic use , Androstenes
7.
Pharmacol Res Perspect ; 12(4): e1253, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39044631

ABSTRACT

This bioequivalence research aims to evaluate the relative bioavailability and pharmacokinetic characteristics of ethinyl estradiol and drospirenone in the test preparation in comparison to the reference preparation during fasting conditions. A liquid chromatography method with tandem mass spectrometry was used to determine the concentrations of drospirenone and ethinyl estradiol in plasma. The pharmacokinetic parameters that were analyzed were the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), time to achieve Cmax (tmax), elimination half life, and area under the concentration time curve of plasma (AUC0-t, AUC0-∞ for ethinyl estradiol, and AUC0-72h for drospirenone). Both the AUC and Cmax parameters were determined to be between 80.00% and 125.00% (90% confidence intervals), which is the acceptable range. Based on the study findings, it was concluded that the test formulation, which includes 3 mg of drospirenone and 0.03 mg of ethinyl estradiol, demonstrated bioequivalence when compared to the reference formulation.


Subject(s)
Androstenes , Area Under Curve , Ethinyl Estradiol , Fasting , Tablets , Therapeutic Equivalency , Humans , Ethinyl Estradiol/pharmacokinetics , Ethinyl Estradiol/administration & dosage , Ethinyl Estradiol/blood , Female , Androstenes/pharmacokinetics , Androstenes/administration & dosage , Adult , Young Adult , Cross-Over Studies , Biological Availability , Healthy Volunteers , Drug Combinations , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods , Half-Life
8.
Semin Oncol ; 51(3-4): 59-68, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38937152

ABSTRACT

We examined data from US Veterans with prostate cancer (PC) to assess disease response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) as monotherapy or combined with abiraterone or enzalutamide to assess ICI efficacy in the real-world. We queried the VA corporate data warehouse (CDW) to identify Veterans with a diagnosis of PC who received ICI for any malignancy and had ≥1 PSA measurement while receiving ICI. To evaluate ICI monotherapy, we restricted analysis to Veterans who had not received LHRH agonists/antagonists, PC-directed medical therapy, or radiation/extirpative surgery of the bladder/prostate within and preceding the duration of ICI administration. For ICI combination analysis, we identified Veterans who received abiraterone or enzalutamide for PC while on ICI. We calculated rates of tumor (PSA) growth (g-rates), comparing them to a 1:2 matched reference cohort. We identified 787 Veterans with PC and ≥1 PSA measurement while receiving an ICI. Median duration of ICI therapy was 155 days. 223 Veterans received ICI monotherapy, with only 17(8%) having a reduction in PSA (median decline = 43%). 12 (5%) had PSA declines >30% (PSA30) which included 6 (3%) who had PSA reductions greater than 50% (PSA50). Median g-rates for ICI plus abiraterone (n = 20) or enzalutamide (n = 31) were 0.000689/d-1 and 0.002819/d-1, respectively, and were statistically insignificant compared to g-rates of matched cohorts receiving abiraterone (g = 0.000925/d-1, P = 0.73) or enzalutamide (g = 0.001929/d-1, P = 0.58) alone. Our data align with clinical trial data in PC, demonstrating limited benefit from ICI monotherapy and predicting no survival benefit from simultaneous abiraterone or enzalutamide with an ICI using g-rate.


Subject(s)
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors , Prostate-Specific Antigen , Prostatic Neoplasms , Veterans , Humans , Male , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Veterans/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , United States/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Nitriles/therapeutic use , Phenylthiohydantoin/therapeutic use , Phenylthiohydantoin/administration & dosage , Benzamides/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Androstenes
9.
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care ; 29(4): 150-159, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38904165

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To describe the effects of estetrol (E4) 15 mg/drospirenone (DRSP) 3 mg on physical and emotional premenstrual and menstrual symptoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used Menstrual Distress Questionnaire (MDQ) data from a phase-3 trial (NCT02817828) in Europe and Russia with participants (18 - 50 years) using E4/DRSP for up to 13 cycles. We assessed mean changes in MDQ-t-scores from baseline to end of treatment in premenstrual (4 days before most recent flow) and menstrual (most recent flow) scores for 4 MDQ domains in starters and switchers (use of hormonal contraception in prior 3 months) and performed a shift analysis on individual symptoms within each domain. RESULTS: Of 1,553 treated participants, 1,398(90.0%), including 531(38%) starters, completed both MDQs. Starters reported improvements for premenstrual Pain (-1.4), Water Retention (-3.3) and Negative Affect (-2.5); and for menstrual Pain (-3.5), Water Retention (-3.4), and Negative Affect (-2.7) (all p < 0.01). For switchers, no changes were significant except an increase in premenstrual (+1.0, p = 0.02) and menstrual (+1.5, p = 0.003) Water Retention. We observed a change in symptom intensity in >40% of participants for Cramps, Backache and Fatigue (domain Pain), Painful or Tender Breast and Swelling (domain Water Retention) and Mood Swings and Irritability (domain Negative Affect). CONCLUSION: E4/DRSP starters experienced significant improvements in the domains Pain, Water Retention and Negative Affect particularly benefiting those with more severe baseline symptoms. Switchers showed minimal changes.


A phase 3 study in Europe and Russia showed that Estetrol/Drospirenone, a new combined oral contraceptive, significantly improved the MDQ scores for domains Pain, Water Retention and Negative Affect in women starting COC use, while switchers showed minimal changes.


Subject(s)
Androstenes , Premenstrual Syndrome , Self Report , Humans , Female , Adult , Russia , Young Adult , Premenstrual Syndrome/drug therapy , Premenstrual Syndrome/psychology , Europe , Androstenes/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Adolescent , Drug Combinations , Surveys and Questionnaires , Dysmenorrhea/drug therapy , Dysmenorrhea/psychology
10.
Phys Chem Chem Phys ; 26(24): 16980-16988, 2024 Jun 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38842434

ABSTRACT

The human steroidogenic cytochrome P450 CYP17A1 catalyzes two types of reactions in the biosynthetic pathway leading from pregnenolone to testosterone and several other steroid hormones. The first is the hydroxylation of pregnenolone or progesterone to the corresponding 17α-hydroxy steroid, followed by a lyase reaction that converts these 17α-hydroxy intermediates to the androgens dehydroepiandrosterone and androstenedione, respectively. cytochrome b5 (cytb5) is known to act as both an effector and electron donor for the lyase oxidations, markedly stimulating the rate of the lyase reaction in its presence relative to the rate in its absence. Extensive sequential backbone 1H,15N and 13C nuclear magnetic resonance assignments have now been made for oxidized CYP17A1 bound to the prostate cancer drug and inhibitor abiraterone. This is the first eukaryotic P450 for which such assignments are now available. These assignments allow more complete interpretation of the structural perturbations observed upon cytb5 addition. Possible mechanism(s) for the effector activity of cytb5 are discussed in light of this new information.


Subject(s)
Cytochromes b5 , Steroid 17-alpha-Hydroxylase , Steroid 17-alpha-Hydroxylase/metabolism , Steroid 17-alpha-Hydroxylase/chemistry , Cytochromes b5/metabolism , Cytochromes b5/chemistry , Humans , Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Biomolecular , Protein Binding , Androstenes/chemistry , Androstenes/metabolism , Protein Conformation , Oxidation-Reduction , Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
11.
Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc ; 320: 124541, 2024 Nov 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38850817

ABSTRACT

In this study, the spectrophotometric method integrated with continuous wavelet transform (CWT) and coupled discrete wavelet transform (DWT) with fuzzy inference system (FIS) was developed for the simultaneous determination of ethinyl estradiol (EE) and drospirenone (DP) in combined oral contraceptives (COCs). The CWT approach was performed in the linearity range of 0.6-6 µg/mL for EE and 0.9 to 18 µg/mL for DP. Biorthogonal with an order of 1.3 (bior1.3) at a wavelength of 216 nm and Daubechies with an order of 2 (db2) at a wavelength of 278 nm were selected as the best wavelet families for obtaining the best zero crossing point for EE and DP, respectively. The limit of detection (LOD) of 0.7677 and 0.3222 µg/mL and the limit of quantification (LOQ) of 2.326 and 0.9765 µg/mL were obtained for EE and DP, respectively. The mean recovery of 103.24% and 99.77%, as well as root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.1896 and 0.1969, were found for EE and DP, respectively. In the DWT, the absorption of the mixtures was decomposed using different wavelets named db4, db2, Symlet2 (sym2), and bior1.3. Each of the wavelet outputs was dimension reduced by the principal component analysis (PCA) method and considered as FIS input. The wavelet of db4 with the coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.9979, RMSE of 0.0968, and mean recovery of 100.63% was chosen as the best one for the EE, while bior1.3 with R2 of 0.9955, RMSE of 0.4055, and mean recovery of 101.93% was selected for DP. These methods were successfully used to analyze the EE and DP simultaneously in tablet pharmaceutical formulation without any separation step. The suggested methods were compared with a reference method (HPLC) using analysis of variance (ANOVA) at a 95% confidence level, and no significant difference was observed in terms of accuracy. The suggested chemometric methods are reliable, rapid, and inexpensive, and can be used as an environmentally friendly alternative to HPLC for the simultaneous estimation of the mentioned drugs in commercial pharmaceutical products.


Subject(s)
Androstenes , Contraceptives, Oral, Combined , Ethinyl Estradiol , Fuzzy Logic , Limit of Detection , Principal Component Analysis , Wavelet Analysis , Ethinyl Estradiol/analysis , Androstenes/analysis , Contraceptives, Oral, Combined/analysis , Humans
12.
Anticancer Res ; 44(7): 2815-2821, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38925843

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: The cytoprotective heat shock protein 27 (HSP27) acts as a protein chaperone, antioxidant, and apoptosis regulator and is involved in cytoskeletal remodeling in prostate cancer. This study was designed to assess the effect of prostate cancer therapeutics on HSP27 to identify drugs that may benefit from an HSP27 inhibitor combination therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cell counting was utilized to assess drug treatment efficiency. Changes in protein levels after drug treatment were assessed using western blot analysis. RESULTS: Abiraterone, cabazitaxel, docetaxel and enzalutamide significantly reduced cell proliferation in LNCaP and PC3 cells. Treatment with abiraterone and enzalutamide led to a significant reduction in HSP27 protein levels. In contrast, treatment with cabazitaxel and docetaxel did not change the HSP27 protein levels. CONCLUSION: Treatment with abiraterone and enzalutamide reduces HSP27 protein in an AR-independent manner and thus suppresses HSP27-correlated resistance mechanisms. However, docetaxel and cabazitaxel do not alter HSP27 protein levels, so that taxanes' efficacy may be enhanced by combining them with HSP27-inhibiting drugs.


Subject(s)
Androstenes , Antineoplastic Agents , Benzamides , Cell Proliferation , Docetaxel , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , HSP27 Heat-Shock Proteins , Nitriles , Phenylthiohydantoin , Prostatic Neoplasms , Taxoids , Humans , Male , Taxoids/pharmacology , Taxoids/therapeutic use , Docetaxel/pharmacology , Phenylthiohydantoin/pharmacology , Phenylthiohydantoin/analogs & derivatives , Phenylthiohydantoin/therapeutic use , HSP27 Heat-Shock Proteins/metabolism , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/drug effects , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/metabolism , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Androstenes/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Molecular Chaperones/metabolism , Heat-Shock Proteins/metabolism
13.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 14151, 2024 06 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38898193

ABSTRACT

We compared the efficacy of 4 mg drospirenone (DRSP) progestin-only pills (POPs) versus combined oral contraceptive pills (COCs) containing 0.02 mg of ethinyl estradiol (EE) and 0.075 mg of gestodene (GS) in ovulation inhibition and inducing unfavorable cervical mucus changes using a delayed-starting approach. This randomized controlled trial involved 36 participants aged 18-45 years. The major outcomes included ovulation inhibition assessed using the Hoogland and Skouby score, and cervical mucus permeability, assessed using the modified World Health Organization score. The results demonstrated ovulation inhibition rates of 77.8% for the EE/GS group and 88.9% for the DRSP group. The risk ratio and absolute risk reduction were 0.50 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.10, 2.40) and - 0.11 (95% CI: - 0.35, 0.13), respectively, satisfying the 20% non-inferiority margin threshold. The median time to achieve unfavorable cervical mucus changes was comparable between the DRSP (3 days, interquartile range [IQR]: 6 days) and EE/GS (3.5 days, IQR: 4 days) groups. However, the DRSP group had a higher incidence of unscheduled vaginal bleeding (55.56% vs. 11.11%; p = 0.005). DRSP-only pills, initiated on days 7-9 of the menstrual cycle, were non-inferior to EE/GS pills in ovulation inhibition. However, they exhibited delayed unfavorable cervical mucus changes compared to the standard two-day backup recommendation.Clinical trial registration: Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR20220819001) https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/show/TCTR20220819001 .


Subject(s)
Androstenes , Contraceptives, Oral, Combined , Ethinyl Estradiol , Ovulation Inhibition , Humans , Female , Adult , Ethinyl Estradiol/administration & dosage , Androstenes/administration & dosage , Androstenes/adverse effects , Young Adult , Adolescent , Contraceptives, Oral, Combined/administration & dosage , Ovulation Inhibition/drug effects , Single-Blind Method , Middle Aged , Norpregnenes/administration & dosage , Norpregnenes/adverse effects , Ovulation/drug effects , Cervix Mucus/drug effects
14.
Saudi Med J ; 45(6): 639-642, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38830651

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To describe the current real-world treatment landscape, sequence of therapies, and outcomes in patients with prostate cancer (PC). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study for PC patients diagnosed at King Abdullah Medical City Cancer Center in Makkah, Saudi Arabia, between January 2011 and December 2021. Data extracted from electronic medical records. RESULTS: A total of 282 patients with PC, with a mean age of 70 years and body mass index of 27. Among them, 274 (99%) had no family history of cancer, while 164 (58%) had hypertension and 125 (44%) had diabetes mellitus. Adenocarcinoma was the most common histology, found in 275 (97%) patients, with 99 (35%) having a Gleason score of 9. Notably, 184 (65%) patients presented with metastatic disease, and 147 (52%) with bone metastasis. While 198 (70%) patients underwent surgery, 184 (65%) did not receive radiotherapy. The most common first-line metastatic therapy was abiraterone in 23 (8%) patients, followed by enzalutamide in 7 (2.5%). During the study period, 167 (59%) patients survived, with an average treatment duration of 2.5 years. CONCLUSION: This study provides insights into real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with PC. The findings of this study highlight the importance of adhering to treatment standards and making informed clinical decisions.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Saudi Arabia/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Phenylthiohydantoin/therapeutic use , Phenylthiohydantoin/analogs & derivatives , Nitriles/therapeutic use , Neoplasm Grading , Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Bone Neoplasms/secondary , Bone Neoplasms/therapy , Androstenes/therapeutic use , Prostatectomy , Cohort Studies , Aged, 80 and over , Benzamides
15.
J Geriatr Oncol ; 15(5): 101773, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38703693

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common non-cutaneous tumor among American men. Androgen receptor signaling inhibitors such as abiraterone and enzalutamide have been approved for similar disease states among patients with advanced PCa. Existing data suggest using steroids is associated with an increased risk of infection. Because abiraterone is usually prescribed with prednisone, we sought to compare the risk of septicemia in patients using abiraterone vs. enzalutamide. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We utilized the SEER-Medicare-linked data and used negative binomial regression models to compare the changes in the rates of septicemia-related hospitalizations six months pre- and post-abiraterone and enzalutamide initiation. RESULTS: We found that the incidence of septicemia-related hospitalizations increased 2.77 fold within six months of initiating abiraterone (incidence rate ratio [IRR]: 2.77, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.17-3.53) 1.97 fold within six months of starting enzalutamide (IRR: 1.97, 95% CI: 1.43-2.72). However, the difference in the changes did not reach statistical significance (interaction IRR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.48-1.06). DISCUSSION: The findings suggest that both abiraterone and enzalutamide are associated with an increased risk of septicemia-related hospitalizations. However, the difference in the increase of septicemia risk following the two treatments did not reach statistical significance. Further studies are warranted to understand the mechanisms at play.


Subject(s)
Androstenes , Benzamides , Nitriles , Phenylthiohydantoin , Sepsis , Humans , Male , Phenylthiohydantoin/therapeutic use , Phenylthiohydantoin/analogs & derivatives , Phenylthiohydantoin/adverse effects , Nitriles/therapeutic use , Benzamides/therapeutic use , Sepsis/epidemiology , Sepsis/chemically induced , Aged , Androstenes/therapeutic use , Androstenes/adverse effects , Aged, 80 and over , United States/epidemiology , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , SEER Program , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Incidence , Medicare
16.
Narra J ; 4(1): e680, 2024 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38798828

ABSTRACT

The antiproliferative properties of metformin and silodosin have been observed in prostate cancer. Furthermore, it is hypothesized that the molecular pathways related to these drugs may impact the levels of human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) in prostate cancer cells. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of metformin and silodosin on the levels of hTERT in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) cells. The present study employed an experimental design with a post-test-only control group. This study utilized the PC3 cell line as a model for mCRPC. A viability experiment was conducted using the CCK-8 method to determine the inhibitory concentration (IC50) values of metformin, silodosin, and abiraterone acetate (AA) after a 72-hour incubation period of PC3 cells. In order to investigate the levels of hTERT, PC3 cells were divided into two control groups: a negative control and a standard therapy with AA. Additionally, three experimental combination groups were added: metformin with AA; silodosin with AA; and metformin, silodosin and AA. The level of hTERT was measured using sandwich ELISA technique. The difference in hTERT levels was assessed using ANOVA followed by a post hoc test. The IC50 values for metformin, silodosin, and AA were 17.7 mM, 44.162 mM, and 66.9 µM, respectively. Our data indicated that the combination of metformin with AA and the combination of metformin, silodosin and AA decreased the hTERT levels when compared to control, AA, and silodosin with AA. The administration of metformin resulted in a reduction of hTERT levels in the PC3 cell line, but the impact of silodosin on hTERT levels was not statistically significant compared to AA group.


Subject(s)
Indoles , Metformin , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant , Telomerase , Humans , Metformin/pharmacology , Metformin/administration & dosage , Metformin/therapeutic use , Telomerase/metabolism , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/pathology , Indoles/pharmacology , Indoles/administration & dosage , Indoles/therapeutic use , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , PC-3 Cells , Cell Survival/drug effects , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Androstenes
17.
Eur J Cancer ; 205: 114103, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38729054

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: PTEN loss and aberrations in PI3K/AKT signaling kinases associate with poorer response to abiraterone acetate (AA) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). In this study, we assessed antitumor activity of the AKT inhibitor capivasertib combined with enzalutamide in mCRPC with prior progression on AA and docetaxel. METHODS: This double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized phase 2 trial, recruited men ≥ 18 years with progressing mCRPC and performance status 0-2 from 15 UK centers. Randomized participants (1:1) received enzalutamide (160 mg orally, once daily) with capivasertib (400 mg)/ placebo orally, twice daily on an intermittent (4 days on, 3 days off) schedule. Primary endpoint was composite response rate (RR): RECIST 1.1 objective response, ≥ 50 % PSA decrease from baseline, or circulating tumor cell count conversion (from ≥ 5 at baseline to < 5 cells/7.5 mL). Subgroup analyses by PTENIHC status were pre-planned. RESULTS: Overall, 100 participants were randomized (50:50); 95 were evaluable for primary endpoint (47:48); median follow-up was 43 months. RR were 9/47 (19.1 %) enzalutamide/capivasertib and 9/48 (18.8 %) enzalutamide/placebo (absolute difference 0.4 % 90 %CI -12.8 to 13.6, p = 0.58), with similar results in the PTENIHC loss subgroup. Irrespective of treatment, OS was significantly worse for PTENIHC loss (10.1 months [95 %CI: 4.6-13.9] vs 14.8 months [95 %CI: 10.8-18]; p = 0.02). Most common treatment-emergent grade ≥ 3 adverse events for the combination were diarrhea (13 % vs 2 %) and fatigue (10 % vs 6 %). CONCLUSIONS: Combined capivasertib/enzalutamide was well tolerated but didn't significantly improve outcomes from abiraterone pre-treated mCRPC.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Benzamides , Docetaxel , Nitriles , Phenylthiohydantoin , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant , Pyrimidines , Humans , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/pathology , Phenylthiohydantoin/administration & dosage , Phenylthiohydantoin/therapeutic use , Phenylthiohydantoin/adverse effects , Docetaxel/administration & dosage , Docetaxel/therapeutic use , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Double-Blind Method , Pyrimidines/therapeutic use , Pyrimidines/administration & dosage , Pyrimidines/adverse effects , Androstenes/therapeutic use , Androstenes/administration & dosage , Aged, 80 and over , Pyrroles
18.
Aquat Toxicol ; 271: 106941, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38723469

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To characterise and compare the toxicity of estetrol (E4) and 17α-ethinylestradiol (EE2), and their respective mixture with the progestin drospirenone (DRSP) in zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos. METHODS: Zebrafish embryos were exposed to E4, EE2, DRSP, E4+DRSP, and EE2+DRSP in a fish embryo acute toxicity (FET) test. A second test examined behavioural responses and, using label-free proteomics, identified changes in protein expression in response to hormonal treatments, across a range of concentrations, including those that are considered to be environmentally relevant. RESULTS: In the FET test, no effects were found from E4 at concentrations ≤100 mg/L, while EE2 induced mortality and morphological abnormalities at concentrations of 1-2 mg/L. In the behavioural test, exposure to 30 ng/L EE2 (∼200 × predicted environmental concentration - PEC) resulted in hypoactivity in fish larvae and exposure to 0.3 ng/L EE2 (∼2 × PEC) led to quantitative changes in protein abundance, revealing potential impacts on RNA processing and protein synthesis machinery. Exposure to E4 did not alter behaviour, but several groups of proteins were modulated, mainly at 710 ng/L (∼200 × PEC), including proteins involved in oxidative phosphorylation. When combined with DRSP, EE2 induced reduced effects on behaviour and proteomic responses, suggesting an antagonistic effect of DRSP. E4+DRSP induced no significant effects on behaviour or proteomic profiles at tested concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that E4-based combined oral contraceptives present a more favourable environmental profile than EE2-based contraceptives, particularly during the early developmental stages of fish.


Subject(s)
Androstenes , Behavior, Animal , Ethinyl Estradiol , Larva , Proteomics , Water Pollutants, Chemical , Zebrafish , Animals , Ethinyl Estradiol/toxicity , Water Pollutants, Chemical/toxicity , Androstenes/toxicity , Behavior, Animal/drug effects , Larva/drug effects , Embryo, Nonmammalian/drug effects
19.
Mol Pharm ; 21(7): 3186-3203, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38815167

ABSTRACT

Globally, prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed tumor and a cause of death in older men. Abiraterone, an orally administered irreversible CYP17 inhibitor, is employed to treat prostate cancer. However, abiraterone has several clinical limitations, such as poor water solubility, low dissolution rate, low bioavailability, and toxic side effects in the liver and kidney. Therefore, there is a need to identify high-efficiency and low-toxicity water-soluble abiraterone derivatives. In this work, we aimed to design and synthesize a series of abiraterone derivatives by methoxypoly(ethylene glycol) (mPEG) modification. Their antitumor activities and toxicology were analyzed in vitro and in vivo. The most potent compound, 2e, retained the principle of action on the CYP17 enzyme target and significantly improved the abiraterone water solubility, cell permeability, and blood safety. No significant abnormalities were observed in toxicology. mPEG-modification significantly improved abiraterone's antitumor activity and efficiency while reducing the associated toxic effects. The finding will provide a theoretical basis for future clinical application of mPEG-modified abiraterone.


Subject(s)
Androstenes , Antineoplastic Agents , Polyethylene Glycols , Prostatic Neoplasms , Solubility , Male , Humans , Androstenes/pharmacology , Androstenes/chemistry , Animals , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents/chemistry , Polyethylene Glycols/chemistry , Mice , Cell Line, Tumor , Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays , Steroid 17-alpha-Hydroxylase/antagonists & inhibitors , Steroid 17-alpha-Hydroxylase/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL