Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 3.861
Filter
1.
J Toxicol Sci ; 49(6): 269-279, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38825486

ABSTRACT

Although morphine has been used for treatment-resistant dyspnea in end-stage heart failure patients, information on its cardiovascular safety profile remains limited. Morphine was intravenously administered to halothane-anesthetized dogs (n=4) in doses of 0.1, 1 and 10 mg/kg/10 min with 20 min of observation period. The low and middle doses attained therapeutic (0.13 µg/mL) and supratherapeutic (0.97 µg/mL) plasma concentrations, respectively. The low dose hardly altered any of the cardiovascular variables except that the QT interval was prolonged for 10-15 min after its start of infusion. The middle dose reduced the preload and afterload to the left ventricle for 5-15 min, then decreased the left ventricular contractility and mean blood pressure for 10-30 min, and finally suppressed the heart rate for 15-30 min. Moreover, the middle dose gradually but progressively prolonged the atrioventricular conduction time, QT interval/QTcV, ventricular late repolarization period and ventricular effective refractory period without altering the intraventricular conduction time, ventricular early repolarization period or terminal repolarization period. A reverse-frequency-dependent delay of ventricular repolarization was confirmed. The high dose induced cardiohemodynamic collapse mainly due to vasodilation in the initial 2 animals by 1.9 and 3.3 min after its start of infusion, respectively, which needed circulatory support to treat. The high dose was not tested further in the remaining 2 animals. Thus, intravenously administered morphine exerts a rapidly appearing vasodilator action followed by slowly developing cardiosuppressive effects. Morphine can delay the ventricular repolarization possibly through IKr inhibition in vivo, but its potential to develop torsade de pointes will be small.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Inhalation , Halothane , Heart Rate , Morphine , Animals , Dogs , Morphine/administration & dosage , Heart Rate/drug effects , Anesthetics, Inhalation/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Inhalation/pharmacokinetics , Male , Toxicokinetics , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Analgesics, Opioid/pharmacokinetics , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Electrocardiography/drug effects , Female , Infusions, Intravenous , Vasodilation/drug effects , Electrophysiological Phenomena/drug effects
2.
Trials ; 25(1): 362, 2024 Jun 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38840210

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Flash visual evoked potentials (FVEPs) are a reliable method for protecting visual function during spine surgery in prone position. However, the popularization and application of FVEPs remain limited due to the unclear influence of various anesthetics on FVEPs. Exploring the effects of anesthetic drugs on FVEP and establishing appropriate anesthesia maintenance methods are particularly important for promoting and applying FVEP. According to the conventional concept, inhaled narcotic drugs significantly affect the success of FVEP monitoring, FVEP extraction, and interpretation. Nonetheless, our previous study demonstrated that sevoflurane-propofol balanced anesthesia was a practicable regimen for FVEPs. Desflurane is widely used in general anesthesia for its rapid recovery properties. As the effect of desflurane on FVEP remains unclear, this trial will investigate the effect of different inhaled concentrations of desflurane anesthesia on amplitude of FVEPs during spine surgery, aiming to identify more feasible anesthesia schemes for the clinical application of FVEP. METHODS/ DESIGN: A total of 70 patients undergoing elective spinal surgery will be enrolled in this prospective, randomized controlled, open-label, patient-assessor-blinded, superiority trial and randomly assigned to the low inhaled concentration of desflurane group (LD group) maintained with desflurane-propofolremifentanil-balanced anesthesia or high inhaled concentration of desflurane group (HD group) maintained with desflurane-remifentanil anesthesia maintenance group at a ratio of 1:1. All patients will be monitored for intraoperative FVEPs, and the baseline will be measured half an hour after induction under total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). After that, patients will receive 0.5 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of desflurane combined with propofol and remifentanil for anesthesia maintenance in the LD group, while 0.7-1.0 MAC of desflurane and remifentanil will be maintained in the HD group. The primary outcome is the N75-P100 amplitude 1 h after the induction of anesthesia. We intend to use the dual measure evaluation, dual data entry, and statistical analysis by double trained assessors to ensure the reliability and accuracy of the results. DISCUSSION: This randomized controlled trial aims to explore the superiority effect of low inhaled concentration of desflurane combined with propofolremifentanil-balanced anesthesia versus high inhaled concentration of desflurane combined with remifentanil anesthesia on amplitude of FVEPs. The study is meant to be published in a peer-reviewed journal and might guide the anesthetic regimen for FVEPs. The conclusion is expected to provide high-quality evidence for the effect of desflurane on FVEPs and aim to explore more feasible anesthesia schemes for the clinical application of FVEPs and visual function protection. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov on July 15, 2022. CLINICALTRIALS: gov Identifier: NCT05465330.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Inhalation , Desflurane , Evoked Potentials, Visual , Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Remifentanil , Spine , Humans , Desflurane/administration & dosage , Evoked Potentials, Visual/drug effects , Anesthetics, Inhalation/administration & dosage , Prospective Studies , Spine/surgery , Middle Aged , Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring/methods , Adult , Male , Remifentanil/administration & dosage , Female , Propofol/administration & dosage , Young Adult , Aged , Anesthetics, Intravenous/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Time Factors , Orthopedic Procedures , Photic Stimulation
3.
Ann Card Anaesth ; 27(1): 10-16, 2024 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38722115

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Regional analgesia is effective for post-thoracotomy pain. The primary objective of the study is to compare the intraoperative requirement of isoflurane and fentanyl between general anaesthesia (GA) with epidural analgesia and GA with paravertebral analgesia. METHODS AND MATERIAL: A prospective observational comparative study was conducted on 56 patients undergoing open thoracotomy procedures. The patients were divided into two groups of 28 by assigning the study participants alternatively to each group: Group GAE - received thoracic epidural catheterization with GA, and Group GAP - received ultrasound guided thoracic paravertebral catheterization on the operative side with GA. Intraoperative requirement of isoflurane, fentanyl, postoperative analgesia, stress response, need of rescue analgesics and adverse effects were observed and analysed. RESULTS: 25 patients in each group were included in the data analysis. The intraoperative requirement of isoflurane (32.28 ± 1.88 vs 48.31 ± 4.34 ml; p < 0.0001) and fentanyl (128.87 ± 25.12 vs 157 ± 30.92 µg; p = 0.0009) were significantly less in the GAE group than in the GAP group. VAS scores and need of rescue analgesics and blood glucose levels were not statistically significant during the postoperative period (p > 0.05). The incidence of adverse effects was comparable except for hypotension and urinary retention which were significantly higher in the GAE group. CONCLUSION: GA with epidural analgesia resulted in significant reduction in the intraoperative consumption of isoflurane and fentanyl in comparison to GA with paravertebral analgesia. However, both the techniques were equally effective in the postoperative period.


Subject(s)
Analgesia, Epidural , Anesthesia, General , Fentanyl , Pain, Postoperative , Thoracotomy , Humans , Female , Male , Thoracotomy/methods , Prospective Studies , Middle Aged , Anesthesia, General/methods , Fentanyl/administration & dosage , Analgesia, Epidural/methods , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Adult , Isoflurane/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Inhalation/administration & dosage , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Analgesics/administration & dosage , Aged , Nerve Block/methods
4.
Br Dent J ; 236(9): 680-682, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38730155

ABSTRACT

Nitrous oxide is a widely used and well-established form of inhalation sedation in dentistry. Its properties have a wide margin of safety and allow for anxious, paediatric and adult patients to receive dental treatment with minimal impact upon discharge. Nitrous oxide has drawbacks, however, including its environmental impact and need for specialist equipment. Methoxyflurane is another drug which could prove to be an alternative to nitrous oxide. Methoxyflurane's use has proved popular within emergency medicine in Australia and New Zealand for its potent analgesic effects and recognition of its anxiolytic effect. As a result, its use in invasive outpatient procedures has now become popular. Unfortunately, there is very limited evidence of its use within dentistry as a form of inhalation sedation and analgesic. A wider evidence base should be established, as methoxyflurane could prove to be an effective and environmentally friendly alternative to nitrous oxide.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Dental , Anesthetics, Inhalation , Methoxyflurane , Nitrous Oxide , Humans , Methoxyflurane/administration & dosage , Methoxyflurane/therapeutic use , Methoxyflurane/pharmacology , Nitrous Oxide/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Inhalation/administration & dosage , Anesthesia, Dental/methods , Isoflurane/administration & dosage , Conscious Sedation/methods
5.
Open Heart ; 11(1)2024 May 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38724266

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Myocardial revascularisation and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) can cause ischaemia-reperfusion injury, leading to myocardial and other end-organ damage. Volatile anaesthetics protect the myocardium in experimental studies. However, there is uncertainty about whether this translates into clinical benefits because of the coadministration of propofol and its detrimental effects, restricting myocardial protective processes. METHODS: In this single-blinded, parallel-group randomised controlled feasibility trial, higher-risk patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery with an additive European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation ≥5 were randomised to receive either propofol or total inhalational anaesthesia as single agents for maintenance of anaesthesia. The primary outcome was the feasibility of recruiting and randomising 50 patients across two cardiac surgical centres, and secondary outcomes included the feasibility of collecting the planned perioperative data, clinically relevant outcomes and assessments of effective patient identification, screening and recruitment. RESULTS: All 50 patients were recruited within 11 months in two centres, allowing for a 13-month hiatus in recruitment due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Overall, 50/108 (46%) of eligible patients were recruited. One patient withdrew before surgery and one patient did not undergo surgery. All but one completed in-hospital and 30-day follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to recruit and randomise higher-risk patients undergoing CABG surgery to a study comparing total inhalational and propofol anaesthesia in a timely manner and with high acceptance and completion rates. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04039854.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Intravenous , Coronary Artery Bypass , Feasibility Studies , Propofol , Humans , Propofol/administration & dosage , Propofol/adverse effects , Male , Female , Pilot Projects , Aged , Anesthetics, Intravenous/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Intravenous/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Single-Blind Method , Coronary Artery Bypass/adverse effects , Coronary Artery Bypass/methods , Anesthesia, Inhalation/methods , Anesthesia, Inhalation/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk Factors , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Anesthetics, Inhalation/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Inhalation/adverse effects , Cardiopulmonary Bypass/adverse effects , Cardiopulmonary Bypass/methods
6.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 24(1): 167, 2024 May 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38702608

ABSTRACT

The exact mechanisms and the neural circuits involved in anesthesia induced unconsciousness are still not fully understood. To elucidate them valid animal models are necessary. Since the most commonly used species in neuroscience are mice, we established a murine model for commonly used anesthetics/sedatives and evaluated the epidural electroencephalographic (EEG) patterns during slow anesthesia induction and emergence. Forty-four mice underwent surgery in which we inserted a central venous catheter and implanted nine intracranial electrodes above the prefrontal, motor, sensory, and visual cortex. After at least one week of recovery, mice were anesthetized either by inhalational sevoflurane or intravenous propofol, ketamine, or dexmedetomidine. We evaluated the loss and return of righting reflex (LORR/RORR) and recorded the electrocorticogram. For spectral analysis we focused on the prefrontal and visual cortex. In addition to analyzing the power spectral density at specific time points we evaluated the changes in the spectral power distribution longitudinally. The median time to LORR after start anesthesia ranged from 1080 [1st quartile: 960; 3rd quartile: 1080]s under sevoflurane anesthesia to 1541 [1455; 1890]s with ketamine. Around LORR sevoflurane as well as propofol induced a decrease in the theta/alpha band and an increase in the beta/gamma band. Dexmedetomidine infusion resulted in a shift towards lower frequencies with an increase in the delta range. Ketamine induced stronger activity in the higher frequencies. Our results showed substance-specific changes in EEG patterns during slow anesthesia induction. These patterns were partially identical to previous observations in humans, but also included significant differences, especially in the low frequencies. Our study emphasizes strengths and limitations of murine models in neuroscience and provides an important basis for future studies investigating complex neurophysiological mechanisms.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Inhalation , Dexmedetomidine , Electroencephalography , Ketamine , Propofol , Sevoflurane , Animals , Mice , Ketamine/pharmacology , Ketamine/administration & dosage , Sevoflurane/pharmacology , Sevoflurane/administration & dosage , Dexmedetomidine/pharmacology , Electroencephalography/drug effects , Electroencephalography/methods , Propofol/pharmacology , Propofol/administration & dosage , Male , Anesthetics, Inhalation/pharmacology , Anesthetics, Inhalation/administration & dosage , Reflex, Righting/drug effects , Reflex, Righting/physiology , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacology , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Intravenous/pharmacology , Anesthetics, Intravenous/administration & dosage , Anesthesia/methods
7.
Drug Des Devel Ther ; 18: 1727-1741, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38803563

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To investigate and quantify the effect of continuous esketamine infusion at different doses on the bispectral index (BIS) during sevoflurane anesthesia. Methods: A total of 120 patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic renal surgery were randomly divided into three groups. Under steady anesthesia and surgical situations, the patient was started on continuous infusion of the study drug: 0.125 mg/kg/h esketamine (group E1), 0.25 mg/kg/h esketamine (group E2), and the same volume of saline (group C). The primary outcome was changes in BIS value after 15 min (T15), 30 min (T30), 45 min (T45), and 60 min (T60) of drug infusion. The secondary outcomes were 95% spectral edge frequency (SEF95), electromyogram (EMG), heart rate (HR), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) from T0 to T60. Furthermore, postoperative pain, postoperative recovery, and perioperative adverse events were evaluated. Results: Compared with group C, group E1 exhibited significant BIS elevation at T30-T60 and group E2 at T15-T60 (P < 0.001). Compared with group E1, group E2 showed a more significant BIS elevation at T15-T60 (P < 0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) of BIS and SEF95 were significantly higher in group E2 than in groups C and E1 (P < 0.05). BIS value for any of the three groups was significantly correlated with SEF95 (P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in the AUC of EMG, HR, and MAP among the three groups. Intraoperative remifentanil consumption and postoperative NRS of pain on movement were significantly reduced in group E2 compared with groups C and E1 (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Continuous infusion of both 0.125 and 0.25 mg/kg/h of esketamine increased the BIS value during sevoflurane anesthesia, and the BIS value gradually stabilized with the prolongation of the infusion time.


Subject(s)
Ketamine , Sevoflurane , Humans , Sevoflurane/administration & dosage , Sevoflurane/pharmacology , Ketamine/administration & dosage , Ketamine/pharmacology , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Infusions, Intravenous , Anesthetics, Inhalation/administration & dosage , Double-Blind Method , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control
8.
Ann Transplant ; 29: e943281, 2024 May 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38803088

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND We aimed to assess the effect of dexmedetomidine (Dex) combined with remifentanil on emergence agitation (EA) during awakening from sevoflurane anesthesia for pediatric liver surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS Sixty children who underwent liver surgery in our hospital were prospectively selected and randomly allocated into group A (placebo+remifentanil+sevoflurane) or group B (Dex+remifentanil+sevoflurane). Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) at different time points, agitation score during awakening, behavioral status, pain level, and the incidence of postoperative adverse effects were compared in both groups. RESULTS Children in group B had lower HR and MAP levels immediately after tracheal extubation and 5 min after tracheal extubation than those in group A. The Aono's scores, PAED agitation scores, and CHIPP scores at 15 min and 30 min of admission to the PACU were lower in group B than in group A. The incidence of agitation during postoperative anesthesia awakening was lower in group B in contrast to group A. There was no significant difference in postoperative adverse reactions between group A and group B. CONCLUSIONS In pediatric liver surgery, the use of Dex+remifentanil+sevoflurane anesthesia can reduce the incidence of EA during the awakening period, stabilize hemodynamic levels, and relieve postoperative pain, and has fewer postoperative adverse effects, which warrants clinical application.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Inhalation , Dexmedetomidine , Emergence Delirium , Remifentanil , Sevoflurane , Humans , Dexmedetomidine/administration & dosage , Dexmedetomidine/therapeutic use , Remifentanil/administration & dosage , Remifentanil/therapeutic use , Sevoflurane/administration & dosage , Female , Male , Anesthetics, Inhalation/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Inhalation/adverse effects , Child, Preschool , Emergence Delirium/prevention & control , Emergence Delirium/etiology , Emergence Delirium/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Hypnotics and Sedatives/therapeutic use , Infant , Child , Psychomotor Agitation/prevention & control , Psychomotor Agitation/etiology , Liver/surgery , Anesthesia Recovery Period , Piperidines/administration & dosage , Piperidines/therapeutic use , Piperidines/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Drug Therapy, Combination , Methyl Ethers/administration & dosage , Methyl Ethers/adverse effects , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use
9.
Eur J Anaesthesiol ; 41(7): 473-479, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38757157

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Climate change has emerged as the single biggest global health threat of the twenty-first century. Nitrous oxide accounts for the largest carbon footprint amongst our use of anaesthetic gas. It is a potent greenhouse gas possessing a global warming potential of approximately 265 times that of carbon dioxide. Despite recent curtailment of its use, it remains extensively employed as an analgesic for women in labour. OBJECTIVES: Assessment of the opinions of post-natal women and staff on nitrous oxide use and to investigate whether knowledge of its environmental harm would influence their choice of labour analgesia. DESIGN: Postnatal women and healthcare staff were invited to participate in a survey of nitrous oxide use as a labour analgesic and knowledge of its effect of the environment. SETTING: A single-centre study in a major obstetric tertiary referral centre in Ireland in 2021. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: To evaluate the awareness and perceptions of postnatal women and staff regarding the environmental impact of nitrous oxide and if it would affect their decision to use it in the future. RESULTS: One hundred postnatal women and 50 healthcare staff completed the survey. One hundred and six post-natal women were invited to complete the survey, resulting in a response rate of 94%. Knowledge of nitrous oxide's environmental impact was low. After receiving information, 46% of patients were more inclined to seek epidural or request it earlier (54%) to limit their nitrous oxide use, while 51% would choose an alternative analgesia to avoid nitrous oxide altogether. Overwhelmingly, 99% believed they had the right to know about these harmful effects when choosing an analgesic option. CONCLUSIONS: Patients should be informed of the environmental impact of nitrous oxide antenatally, empowering them to make informed decision on a climate friendly analgesic option if they wish.


Subject(s)
Analgesia, Obstetrical , Nitrous Oxide , Humans , Nitrous Oxide/administration & dosage , Nitrous Oxide/adverse effects , Female , Pregnancy , Analgesia, Obstetrical/methods , Adult , Surveys and Questionnaires , Anesthetics, Inhalation/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Inhalation/adverse effects , Ireland , Health Personnel , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Young Adult , Attitude of Health Personnel
10.
Nutrients ; 16(10)2024 May 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38794716

ABSTRACT

It has been demonstrated that isoflurane-induced anesthesia can increase the blood glucose level, leading to hyperglycemia and several adverse effects. The administration of a mix of ketone diester (KE) and medium-chain triglyceride (MCT) oil, named KEMCT, abolished the isoflurane-anesthesia-induced increase in blood glucose level and prolonged the recovery time from isoflurane anesthesia in a male preclinical rodent model, Wistar Albino Glaxo/Rijswijk (WAG/Rij) rats. While most preclinical studies use exclusively male animals, our previous study on blood glucose changes in response to KEMCT administration showed that the results can be sex-dependent. Thus, in this study, we investigated female WAG/Rij rats, whether KEMCT gavage (3 g/kg/day for 7 days) can change the isoflurane (3%)-anesthesia-induced increase in blood glucose level and the recovery time from isoflurane-evoked anesthesia using the righting reflex. Moreover, KEMCT-induced ketosis may enhance both the extracellular level of adenosine and the activity of adenosine A1 receptors (A1Rs). To obtain information on the putative A1R mechanism of action, the effects of an A1R antagonist, DPCPX (1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine; intraperitoneal/i.p. 0.2 mg/kg), on KEMCT-generated influences were also investigated. Our results show that KEMCT supplementation abolished the isoflurane-anesthesia-induced increase in blood glucose level, and this was abrogated by the co-administration of DPCPX. Nevertheless, KEMCT gavage did not change the recovery time from isoflurane-induced anesthesia. We can conclude that intragastric gavage of exogenous ketone supplements (EKSs), such as KEMCT, can abolish the isoflurane-anesthesia-induced increase in blood glucose level in both sexes likely through A1Rs in WAG/Rij rats, while recovery time was not affected in females, unlike in males. These results suggest that the administration of EKSs as an adjuvant therapy may be effective in mitigating metabolic side effects of isoflurane, such as hyperglycemia, in both sexes.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Inhalation , Blood Glucose , Isoflurane , Ketones , Animals , Female , Isoflurane/pharmacology , Isoflurane/administration & dosage , Blood Glucose/drug effects , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Rats , Ketones/administration & dosage , Ketones/pharmacology , Anesthetics, Inhalation/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Inhalation/pharmacology , Rats, Wistar , Dietary Supplements , Triglycerides/blood , Triglycerides/administration & dosage , Male , Adenosine/pharmacology , Adenosine/administration & dosage , Anesthesia/methods
12.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 24(1): 162, 2024 Apr 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38678209

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Anesthesia techniques and drug selection may influence tumor recurrence and metastasis. Neutrophil extracellular trapping (NETosis), an immunological process, has been linked to an increased susceptibility to metastasis in individuals with tumors. Furthermore, recurrence may be associated with vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A), a mediator of angiogenesis. This study investigates the impact of lidocaine (combined with sevoflurane or propofol anesthesia ) during breast cancer surgery inhibits the expression of biomarkers associated with metastasis and recurrence (specifically H3Cit, NE, MPO, MMP-9 and VEGF-A). METHODS: We randomly assigned 120 women undergoing primary or invasive breast tumor resection to receive one of four anesthetics: sevoflurane (S), sevoflurane plus i.v. lidocaine (SL), propofol (P), and propofol plus i.v. lidocaine (PL). Blood samples were collected before induction and 3 h after the operation. Biomarkers associated with NETosis (citrullinated histone H3 [H3Cit], myeloperoxidase [MPO], and neutrophil elastase [NE]) and angiogenesis were quantified using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. RESULTS: Patient and breast tumor characteristics, along with perioperative management, did not differ between study groups. In intra-group comparisons, S and P groups demonstrated a statistically significant increase in post-operative MPO (S group: 10.39[6.89-17.22] vs. 14.31[8.55-20.87] ng ml-1, P = 0.032; P group: 9.45[6.73-17.37] vs. 14.34[9.87-19.75] ng ml-1, P = 0.035)and NE(S group: 182.70[85.66-285.85] vs. 226.20[91.85-391.65] ng ml-1, P = 0.045; P group: 154.22[97.31-325.30] vs. 308.66[132.36-483.57] ng ml-1, P = 0.037) concentrations compared to pre-operative measurements, whereas SL and PL groups did not display a similar increase. H3Cit, MMP-9, and VEGF-A concentrations were not significantly influenced by the anesthesia techniques and drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of the specific technique employed for general anesthesia, there was no increase in the postoperative serum concentrations of MPO and NE after perioperative lidocaine infusion compared to preoperative serum concentrations. This supports the hypothesis that intravenous lidocaine during cancer surgery aimed at achieving a cure may potentially decrease the likelihood of recurrence. Further interpretation and discussion of clinical implications are warranted, emphasizing the significance of these findings in the context of cancer surgery and recurrence prevention. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR2300068563.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Lidocaine , Neovascularization, Pathologic , Propofol , Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Lidocaine/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Propofol/administration & dosage , Propofol/pharmacology , Sevoflurane/administration & dosage , Adult , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Extracellular Traps/metabolism , Extracellular Traps/drug effects , Neutrophils/drug effects , Neutrophils/metabolism , Aged , Biomarkers/blood , Anesthetics, Inhalation/administration & dosage , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/blood , Angiogenesis
13.
Vet Anaesth Analg ; 51(3): 253-265, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38580536

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate cardiovascular effects of oral tasipimidine on propofol-isoflurane anaesthesia with or without methadone and dexmedetomidine at equianaesthetic levels. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, placebo-controlled, blinded, experimental trial. ANIMALS: A group of seven adult Beagle dogs weighing (mean ± standard deviation) 12.4 ± 2.6 kg and a mean age of 20.6 ± 1 months. METHODS: The dogs underwent four treatments 60 minutes before induction of anaesthesia with propofol. PP: placebo orally and placebo (NaCl 0.9%) intravenously (IV); TP: tasipimidine 30 µg kg-1 orally and placebo IV; TMP: tasipimidine 30 µg kg-1 orally and methadone 0.2 mg kg-1 IV; and TMPD: tasipimidine 30 µg kg-1 orally with methadone 0.2 mg kg-1 and dexmedetomidine 1 µg kg-1 IV followed by 1 µg kg-1 hour-1. Isoflurane in oxygen was maintained for 120 minutes at 1.2 individual minimum alveolar concentration preventing motor movement. Cardiac output (CO), tissue blood flow (tbf), tissue oxygen saturation (stO2) and relative haemoglobin content were determined. Arterial and mixed venous blood gases, arterial and pulmonary artery pressures and heart rate (HR) were measured at baseline; 60 minutes after oral premedication; 5 minutes after IV premedication; 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after propofol injection; and 30 minutes after switching the vaporiser off. Data were analysed by two-way anova for repeated measures; p < 0.05. RESULTS: Tasipimidine induced a significant 20-30% reduction in HR and CO with decreases in MAP (10-15%), tbf (40%) and stO2 (43%). Blood pressure and oxygenation variables were mainly influenced by propofol-isoflurane-oxygen anaesthesia, preceded by short-lived alterations related to IV methadone and dexmedetomidine. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Tasipimidine induced mild to moderate cardiovascular depression. It can be incorporated into a common anaesthetic protocol without detrimental effects in healthy dogs, when anaesthetics are administered to effect and cardiorespiratory function is monitored.


Subject(s)
Dexmedetomidine , Isoflurane , Methadone , Propofol , Pyrazoles , Animals , Dogs , Dexmedetomidine/administration & dosage , Dexmedetomidine/pharmacology , Propofol/administration & dosage , Propofol/pharmacology , Methadone/administration & dosage , Methadone/pharmacology , Female , Isoflurane/administration & dosage , Isoflurane/pharmacology , Heart Rate/drug effects , Male , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacology , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Quinolizines/pharmacology , Quinolizines/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Intravenous/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Intravenous/pharmacology , Anesthetics, Inhalation/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Inhalation/pharmacology , Premedication/veterinary
14.
Res Vet Sci ; 172: 105254, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38582048

ABSTRACT

Two randomized crossover trials evaluated the effects of nicardipine constant rate infusion (CRI) on 1) the anesthetic potency of sevoflurane and 2) the ability to attenuate dexmedetomidine-induced cardiovascular depression in anesthetized dogs. First, six healthy Beagle dogs weighing 11.7 ± 0.9 kg were allocated to one of three treatments that administered a CRI of carrier (saline) or dexmedetomidine 0.5 or 3.0 µg/kg/h following a loading dose. The minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of sevoflurane was determined utilizing electric stimuli before and after the loading dose of nicardipine (20 µg/kg intravenously for 10 min), followed by CRI at 40 µg/kg/h with 60 min of equilibration. Subsequently, cardiovascular and blood gas variables were evaluated in another trial under sevoflurane anesthesia at the individual 1.5 MAC. After baseline measurements, the dogs were assigned to two treatments (dexmedetomidine CRI at 0.5 or 3.0 µg/kg/h following a loading dose) with sevoflurane doses adjusted to 1.5 times of MAC equivalent, and the measurements were repeated every 15 min for 120 min. After 60 min, nicardipine CRI at 40 µg/kg/h with a loading dose was added to the dexmedetomidine CRI. Dexmedetomidine infusions significantly decreased the sevoflurane MAC but nicardipine did not significantly alter the MAC either with or without dexmedetomidine CRI in dogs. Dexmedetomidine dose-dependently decreased the cardiac index and increased the systemic vascular resistance index; these effects were fully counteracted by concomitant nicardipine CRI. Nicardipine CRI can be useful for controlling the cardiovascular depression elicited by dexmedetomidine in anesthetized dogs without affecting the anesthetic potency of sevoflurane.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Inhalation , Dexmedetomidine , Nicardipine , Sevoflurane , Animals , Dexmedetomidine/pharmacology , Dexmedetomidine/administration & dosage , Dogs , Sevoflurane/pharmacology , Sevoflurane/administration & dosage , Nicardipine/pharmacology , Nicardipine/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Inhalation/pharmacology , Anesthetics, Inhalation/administration & dosage , Male , Cross-Over Studies , Female , Pulmonary Alveoli/drug effects , Infusions, Intravenous/veterinary , Heart Rate/drug effects , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacology , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Blood Pressure/drug effects
15.
Vet Anaesth Analg ; 51(3): 244-252, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38555213

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of oral tasipimidine on dog handling, ease of catheter placement and propofol and isoflurane requirements for anaesthesia. STUDY DESIGN: Placebo-controlled, randomized, blinded, experimental trial. ANIMALS: A group of seven adult Beagle dogs weighing (mean ± standard deviation) 13.1 ± 2.7 kg with a mean age of 18.6 ± 1 months. METHODS: The dogs underwent four treatments before induction of anaesthesia with propofol. PP: placebo orally (PO) 60 minutes before induction of anaesthesia followed by placebo (NaCl 0.9%) intravenously (IV). TP: tasipimidine 30 µg kg-1 (PO) 60 minutes before induction of anaesthesia followed by placebo (NaCl 0.9%) IV. TMP: tasipimidine 30 µg kg-1 PO 60 minutes before induction of anaesthesia followed by methadone 0.2 mg kg-1 IV. TMPD: tasipimidine 30 µg kg-1 PO 60 minutes before induction of anaesthesia followed by methadone 0.2 mg kg-1 and dexmedetomidine 1 µg kg-1 IV followed by a dexmedetomidine constant rate infusion of 1 µg kg-1 hour-1. Sedation, response to catheter placement, intubation quality, time to loss of consciousness, time to intubation, required dose of propofol and minimum alveolar isoflurane concentration preventing motor movement (MACNM) were determined. A mixed-model analysis or the Friedman and Mann-Whitney test were used; p-value < 0.05. RESULTS: Response to catheter placement did not differ between treatments. Tasipimidine alone reduced the propofol dose by 30%. Addition of methadone or methadone and dexmedetomidine reduced the propofol dose by 48% and 50%, respectively. Isoflurane MACNM was reduced by 19% in tasipimidine-medicated dogs, whereas in combination with methadone or methadone and dexmedetomidine, isoflurane MACNM was reduced by 35%. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: An anxiolytic dose of tasipimidine induced mild signs of sedation in dogs and reduced propofol and isoflurane requirements to induce and maintain anaesthesia, which needs to be considered in an anaesthetic plan.


Subject(s)
Anti-Anxiety Agents , Imidazoles , Propofol , Animals , Dogs , Male , Anti-Anxiety Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Anxiety Agents/pharmacology , Propofol/administration & dosage , Propofol/pharmacology , Female , Isoflurane/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Intravenous/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Intravenous/pharmacology , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacology , Dexmedetomidine/administration & dosage , Dexmedetomidine/pharmacology , Quinolizines/administration & dosage , Quinolizines/pharmacology , Anesthetics, Inhalation/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Inhalation/pharmacology
16.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 38(6): 1314-1321, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38490897

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To quantify and compare the emissions for deep sedation with total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and general anesthesia with inhaled agents during the transcatheter aortic valve replacement procedure. DESIGN: A retrospective study. SETTING: A tertiary hospital in Boston, Massachusetts. PARTICIPANTS: The anesthesia records of 604 consecutive patients who underwent the transcatheter aortic valve replacement procedure between January 1, 2018, and March 31, 2022, were reviewed and analyzed. INTERVENTIONS: Data were examined and compared in the following 2 groups: general anesthesia with inhaled agents and deep sedation with TIVA. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The gases, drugs, airway management devices, and anesthesia machine electricity were collected and converted into carbon dioxide emissions (CO2e). The carbon emissions of intravenous medications were converted with the CO2e data for anesthetic pharmaceuticals from the Parvatker et al. study. For inhaled agents, inhaled anesthetics and oxygen/air flow rate were collected at 15-minute intervals and calculated using the anesthetic gases calculator provided by the Association of Anesthetists. The airway management devices were converted based on life-cycle assessments. The electricity consumed by the anesthesia machine during general anesthesia was estimated from the manufacturer's data (Dräger, GE) and local Energy Information Administration data. The data were analyzed in the chi-squared test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test. There were no significant differences in the patients' demographic characteristics, such as age, sex, weight, height, and body mass index. The patients who received general anesthesia with inhaled agents had statistically higher total CO2e per case than deep sedation with TIVA (16.188 v 1.518 kg CO2e; p < 0.001), primarily due to the inhaled agents and secondarily to airway management devices. For deep sedation with TIVA, the major contributors were intravenous medications (71.02%) and airway management devices (16.58%). A subgroup study of patients who received sevoflurane only showed the same trend with less variation. CONCLUSIONS: The patients who received volatile anesthesia were found to have a higher CO2e per case. This difference remained after a subgroup analysis evaluating those patients only receiving sevoflurane and after accounting for the differences in the duration of anesthesia. Data from this study and others should be collectively considered as the healthcare profession aims to provide the best care possible for their patients while limiting the harm caused to the environment.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Inhalation , Anesthesia, Intravenous , Carbon Footprint , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Aged , Anesthesia, Inhalation/methods , Aged, 80 and over , Anesthesia, Intravenous/methods , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/methods , Anesthetics, Inhalation/administration & dosage
17.
Anesthesiology ; 140(6): 1126-1133, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38466217

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Prospective interventional trials and retrospective observational analyses provide conflicting evidence regarding the relationship between propofol versus inhaled volatile general anesthesia and long-term survival after cancer surgery. Specifically, bladder cancer surgery lacks prospective clinical trial evidence. METHODS: Data on bladder cancer surgery performed under general anesthesia between 2014 and 2021 from the National Quality Registry for Urinary Tract and Bladder Cancer and the Swedish Perioperative Registry were record-linked. Overall survival was compared between patients receiving propofol or inhaled volatile for anesthesia maintenance. The minimum clinically important difference was defined as a 5-percentage point difference in 5-yr survival. RESULTS: Of 7,571 subjects, 4,519 (59.7%) received an inhaled volatile anesthetic, and 3,052 (40.3%) received propofol for general anesthesia maintenance. The two groups were quite similar in most respects but differed in American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status and tumor stage. Propensity score matching was used to address treatment bias. Survival did not differ during follow-up (median, 45 months [interquartile range, 33 to 62 months]) in the full unmatched cohort nor after 1:1 propensity score matching (3,052 matched pairs). The Kaplan-Meier adjusted 5-yr survival rates in the matched cohort were 898 of 3,052, 67.5% (65.6 to 69.3%) for propofol and 852 of 3,052, 68.5% (66.7 to 70.4%) for inhaled volatile general anesthesia, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.96 to 1.15]; P = 0.332). A sensitivity analysis restricted to 1,766 propensity score-matched pairs of patients who received only one general anesthetic during the study period did not demonstrate a difference in survival; Kaplan-Meier adjusted 5-yr survival rates were 521 of 1,766, 67.1% (64.7 to 69.7%) and 482 of 1,766, 68.9% (66.5 to 71.4%) for propofol and inhaled volatile general anesthesia, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.97 to 1.23]; P = 0.139). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing bladder cancer surgery under general anesthesia, there was no statistically significant difference in long-term overall survival associated with the choice of propofol or an inhaled volatile maintenance.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, General , Anesthetics, Inhalation , Anesthetics, Intravenous , Propofol , Registries , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms , Humans , Propofol/administration & dosage , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/surgery , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/mortality , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Aged , Anesthesia, General/mortality , Anesthesia, General/methods , Middle Aged , Anesthetics, Inhalation/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Intravenous/administration & dosage , Cohort Studies , Survival Rate/trends , Sweden/epidemiology , Aged, 80 and over
18.
Vet Res Commun ; 48(3): 1621-1630, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38433171

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to determine the minimum anesthetic concentration of isoflurane (MACISO) and sevoflurane (MACSEVO) and evaluate the cardiorespiratory changes induced by varying fractions of inspired oxygen (FiO2) in Magellanic penguins (Spheniscus magellanicus). Twenty adult penguins (3.53 ± 0.44 kg) of undetermined sex were used. Both MACISO (n = 9) and MACSEVO (n = 13) were established using an up-and-down design. Next, twelve mechanically ventilated penguins were maintained at 1 MACISO or 1 MACSEVO (n = 6 per group) with the FiO2 initially set at 1.0. Three FiO2 values (0.6, 0.4 and 0.2) were then held constant during anesthesia for 20 minutes each. Arterial blood samples were collected for gas analysis after the 20-minute period for each FiO2. Mean ± SD MACISO was 1.93 ± 0.10% and MACSEVO was 3.53 ± 0.13%. Other than heart rate at 0.6 FiO2 (86 ± 11 beats/minute in MACISO and 132 ± 37 beats/minute in MACSEVO; p = 0.041), no significant cardiorespiratory differences were detected between groups. In both groups, decreasing the FiO2 produced increased pH values and reduced partial pressures of carbon dioxide and bicarbonate. Partial pressures of oxygen (PaO2) gradually lowered from 1.0 FiO2 through 0.2 FiO2, though hypoxemia (PaO2 < 80 mmHg) occurred only with the latter FiO2. The MACISO and the MACSEVO for the Magellanic penguin fell within the upper range of reported avian MAC estimates. To prevent hypoxemia in healthy, mechanically ventilated, either isoflurane- or sevoflurane-anesthetized Magellanic penguins, a minimum FiO2 of 0.4 should be used.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Inhalation , Isoflurane , Oxygen , Sevoflurane , Spheniscidae , Animals , Spheniscidae/physiology , Isoflurane/pharmacology , Isoflurane/administration & dosage , Sevoflurane/pharmacology , Anesthetics, Inhalation/pharmacology , Anesthetics, Inhalation/administration & dosage , Oxygen/blood , Heart Rate/drug effects , Male , Anesthesia, Inhalation/veterinary , Female , Blood Gas Analysis/veterinary
19.
J Anesth ; 38(3): 295-300, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38551676

ABSTRACT

As the COVID-19 pandemic increased the use of propofol in the intensive care unit for the management of respiratory sequelae and supply had become a major issue. Indeed, most hospitals in Japan were forced to use propofol only for induction of anesthesia with inhalational maintenance. Large amounts of propofol remain in the syringe which exacerbates the problems by increased waste. I propose that use of low dose propofol in combination with a low concentration inhaled anesthetic as an alternative and call this hybrid anesthesia. Several advantages of hybrid anesthesia are evident in the literature. Volatile anesthesia has several disadvantages such as cancer progression, emergence agitation, marked reduction in motor evoked potentials (MEP), laryngospasm with desflurane and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Volatile anesthesia exerts some beneficial actions such as myocardial protection and fast emergence with desflurane. In contrast, total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) provides better survival in patients undergoing radical cancer surgery, reduction in emergence agitation, laryngospasm, PONV and better MEP trace Intraoperative awareness occurs more often during TIVA. When intravenous and volatile anesthesia are combined (hybrid anesthesia), the disadvantages of both methods may be offset by clear advantages. Thus, hybrid anesthesia may, therefore, be a viable anesthetic choice.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Inhalation , COVID-19 , Humans , Anesthetics, Inhalation/administration & dosage , COVID-19/prevention & control , Propofol/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Intravenous/administration & dosage , Anesthesia, Intravenous/methods , Anesthesia, Inhalation/methods
20.
J Clin Anesth ; 95: 111441, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38452428

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of a non-reactive carbon dioxide absorbent (AMSORB® Plus) versus a traditional carbon dioxide absorbent (Medisorb™) on the FGF used by anesthesia providers and an electronic educational feedback intervention using Carestation™ Insights (GE HealthCare) on provider-specific change in FGF. DESIGN: Prospective, single-center cohort study set in a greening initiative. SETTING: Operating room. PARTICIPANTS: 157 anesthesia providers (i.e., anesthesiology trainees, certified registered nurse anesthetists, and solo anesthesiologists). INTERVENTIONS: Intervention #1 was the introduction of AMSORB® Plus into 8 Aisys CS2, Carestation™ Insights-enabled anesthesia machines (GE HealthCare) at the study site. At the end of week 6, anesthesia providers were educated and given an environmentally oriented electronic feedback strategy for the next 12 weeks of the study (Intervention #2) using Carestation™ Insights data. MEASUREMENTS: The dual primary outcomes were the difference in average daily FGF during maintenance anesthesia between machines assigned to AMSORB® Plus versus Medisorb™ and the provider-specific change in average fresh gas flows after 12 weeks of feedback and education compared to the historical data. MAIN RESULTS: Over the 18-week period, there were 1577 inhaled anesthetics performed in the 8 operating rooms (528 for intervention 1, 1049 for intervention 2). There were 1001 provider days using Aisys CS2 machines and 7452 provider days of historical data from the preceding year. Overall, AMSORB® Plus was not associated with significantly less FGF (mean - 80 ml/min, 97.5% confidence interval - 206 to 46, P = .15). The environmentally oriented electronic feedback intervention was not associated with a significant decrease in provider-specific mean FGF (-112 ml/min, 97.5% confidence interval - 244 to 21, P = .059). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that introducing a non-reactive absorbent did not significantly alter FGF. Using environmentally oriented electronic feedback relying on data analytics did not result in significantly reduced provider-specific FGF.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Inhalation , Carbon Dioxide , Operating Rooms , Humans , Prospective Studies , Anesthetics, Inhalation/administration & dosage , Feedback , Anesthesiologists , Anesthesiology/instrumentation , Anesthesiology/education , Nurse Anesthetists , Anesthesia, Inhalation/instrumentation , Anesthesia, Inhalation/methods , Gas Scavengers , Female
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL