Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 30.736
Filter
Add more filters








Publication year range
2.
Ter Arkh ; 96(5): 531-542, 2024 Jun 03.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38829816

ABSTRACT

The use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for a wide range of diseases is increasing, in part due to an increasing elderly population. Elderly patients are more vulnerable to adverse drug reactions, including side effects and adverse effects of drug-drug interactions, often occurring in this category of patients due to multimorbidity and polypharmacy. One of the most popular NSAIDs in the world is celecoxib. It is a selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitor with 375 times more COX-2 inhibitory activity than COX-1. As a result, celecoxib has a better gastrointestinal tract safety profile than non-selective NSAIDs. Gastrointestinal tolerance is an essential factor that physicians should consider when selecting NSAIDs for elderly patients. Celecoxib can be used in a wide range of diseases of the musculoskeletal system and rheumatological diseases, for the treatment of acute pain in women with primary dysmenorrhea, etc. It is also increasingly used as part of a multimodal perioperative analgesia regimen. There is strong evidence that COX-2 is actively involved in the pathogenesis of ischemic brain damage, as well as in the development and progression of neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease. NSAIDs are first-line therapy in the treatment of acute migraine attacks. Celecoxib is well tolerated in patients with risk factors for NSAID-associated nephropathy. It does not decrease the glomerular filtration rate in elderly patients and patients with chronic renal failure. Many meta-analyses and epidemiological studies have not confirmed the increased risk of cardiovascular events reported in previous clinical studies and have not shown an increased risk of cardiovascular events with celecoxib, irrespective of dose. COX-2 activation is one of the key factors contributing to obesity-related inflammation. Specific inhibition of COX-2 by celecoxib increases insulin sensitivity in overweight or obese patients. Combination therapies may be a promising new area of treatment for obesity and diabetes.


Subject(s)
Celecoxib , Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors , Humans , Celecoxib/administration & dosage , Celecoxib/adverse effects , Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors/adverse effects , Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Comorbidity , Drug Interactions
3.
J Med Case Rep ; 18(1): 242, 2024 May 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38724965

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Although viscosupplementation is a commonly used treatment for osteoarthritis and is widely regarded as a safe treatment option, it is associated with the rare complication of pseudoseptic arthritis. Most existing case reports that cite this rare complication employed the use of early broad-spectrum antibiotics. CASE PRESENTATION: In this case report, we present a 61-year-old African American female patient who presented with bilateral knee pseudoseptic arthritis in the setting of viscosupplementation. She presented 3 days after bilateral viscosupplementation injections with bilateral knee swelling, discomfort, and pain with micromotion. Her white blood cell count (WBC) was 12.83 (4.5-11 normal), her C-reactive protein (CRP) level was 159 mg/L (0-10 normal), and her erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was 79 mm/hour (0-40 normal). Her left knee aspirate yielded 38,580 WBC with a negative gram stain and negative cultures. Her right knee aspirate yielded 29,670 WBC with a negative gram stain and negative cultures. Through the utilization of careful clinical monitoring, ice therapy, and non-steroidal inflammatory medication, we were able to successfully treat this patient while maintaining proper antibiotic stewardship. CONCLUSION: Pseudoseptic arthritis in the setting of viscosupplementation can be adequately treated and monitored without the use of antibiotics.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Antimicrobial Stewardship , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Viscosupplementation , Knee Joint , Treatment Outcome , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Osteoarthritis, Knee/drug therapy
4.
BMC Biotechnol ; 24(1): 26, 2024 May 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38724967

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory autoimmune disease, and it leads to irreversible inflammation in intra-articular joints. Current treatment approaches for RA include non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), corticosteroids, and biological agents. To overcome the drug-associated toxicity of conventional therapy and transdermal tissue barrier, an injectable NSAID-loaded hydrogel system was developed and explored its efficacy. RESULTS: The surface morphology and porosity of the hydrogels indicate that they mimic the natural ECM, which is greatly beneficial for tissue healing. Further, NSAIDs, i.e., diclofenac sodium, were loaded into the hydrogel, and the in vitro drug release pattern was found to be burst release for 24 h and subsequently sustainable release of 50% drug up to 10 days. The DPPH assay revealed that the hydrogels have good radical scavenging activity. The biocompatibility study carried out by MTT assay proved good biocompatibility and anti-inflammatory activity of the hydrogels was carried out by gene expression study in RAW 264.7 cells, which indicate the downregulation of several key inflammatory genes such as COX-2, TNF-α & 18s. CONCLUSION: In summary, the proposed ECM-mimetic, thermo-sensitive in situ hydrogels may be utilized for intra-articular inflammation modulation and can be beneficial by reducing the frequency of medication and providing optimum lubrication at intra-articular joints.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal , Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Hydrogels , Hydrogels/chemistry , Animals , Mice , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , RAW 264.7 Cells , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/pharmacology , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/chemistry , Extracellular Matrix/metabolism , Extracellular Matrix/drug effects , Diclofenac/pharmacology , Diclofenac/therapeutic use , Drug Liberation
5.
Vet Q ; 44(1): 1-11, 2024 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38711265

ABSTRACT

Our study aimed to evaluate the effect of different treatments for BRD on health and welfare in fattening bulls. A total of 264 bulls were enrolled. Welfare was assessed on day 2 (T0) and day 15 (T1) after arrival. A decrease in the welfare level was observed from T0 to T1. All bulls were inspected clinically at T0 and T1 revealing an increase of skin lesions and lameness in T1. In both periods, a high incidence of respiratory disease was observed. A prevalence of 79.55% and 95.45% of Mycoplasma bovis using RT-PCR and culture at T0 and T1 respectively was observed. Blood samples were collected for haematology at T0 and T1. At T0, 36 animals were individually treated for BRD with an antimicrobial (IT), 54 received a metaphylactic treatment with tulathromycin (M), 150 received a metaphylactic treatment with tulathromycin plus a second antimicrobial (M + IT) whereas 24 were considered healthy and therefore not treated (NT). Additionally, 128 were treated with a non-steroid anti-inflammatory (NSAID). Neutrophils of M + IT were significantly higher than groups NT and M and the lymphocytes of M + IT were significantly lower than that of IT. White blood cells, neutrophils and N/L ratio of animals treated with an NSAID was significantly higher than that not treated. Lung inspection of 172 bulls at the abattoir indicated that 92.43% presented at least one lung lesion. A statistically significant effect of the NSAID treatment on the lung lesions was observed. Our findings indicate that BRD was a major welfare and health concern and evidence the difficulties of antimicrobial treatment of M. bovis.


Subject(s)
Animal Welfare , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal , Heterocyclic Compounds , Macrolides , Animals , Cattle , Male , Cross-Sectional Studies , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Disaccharides/pharmacology , Disaccharides/therapeutic use , Cattle Diseases/drug therapy , Cattle Diseases/microbiology , Mycoplasma bovis/drug effects , Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Infective Agents/pharmacology , Mycoplasma Infections/veterinary , Mycoplasma Infections/drug therapy
6.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 25(1): 344, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38693474

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is a significant health problem worldwide, with a lifetime prevalence of 84% in the general adult population. To rationalise the management of LBP, clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have been issued in various countries around the world. This study aims to identify and compare the recommendations of recent CPGs for the management of LBP across the world. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PEDro, and major guideline databases were searched from 2017 to 2022 to identify CPGs. CPGs focusing on information regarding the management and/or treatment of non-specific LBP were considered eligible. The quality of included guidelines was evaluated using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument. RESULTS: Our analysis identified a total of 22 CPGs that met the inclusion criteria, and were of middle and high methodological quality as assessed by the AGREE II tool. The guidelines exhibited heterogeneity in their recommendations, particularly in the approach to different stages of LBP. For acute LBP, the guidelines recommended the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), therapeutic exercise, staying active, and spinal manipulation. For subacute LBP, the guidelines recommended the use of NSAIDs, therapeutic exercise, staying active, and spinal manipulation. For chronic LBP, the guidelines recommended therapeutic exercise, the use of NSAIDs, spinal manipulation, and acupuncture. CONCLUSIONS: Current CPGs provide recommendations for almost all major aspects of the management of LBP, but there is marked heterogeneity between them. Some recommendations lack clarity and overlap with other treatments within the guidelines.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal , Low Back Pain , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Low Back Pain/therapy , Low Back Pain/diagnosis , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Exercise Therapy/standards , Manipulation, Spinal/standards , Manipulation, Spinal/methods , Chronic Pain/therapy , Chronic Pain/diagnosis , Pain Management/standards , Pain Management/methods
7.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 679, 2024 May 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38812039

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Healthcare regulators in many countries undertake inspections of healthcare providers and publish inspection outcomes with the intention of improving quality of care. Comprehensive inspections of general practices in England by the Care Quality Commission began for the first time in 2014. It is assumed that inspection and rating will raise standards and improve care, but the presence and extent of any improvements is unknown. We aim to determine if practice inspection ratings are associated with past performance on prescribing indicators and if prescribing behaviour changes following inspection. METHODS: Longitudinal study using a dataset of 6771 general practices in England. Practice inspection date and score was linked with monthly practice-level data on prescribing indicators relating to antibiotics, hypnotics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The sample covers practices receiving their first inspection between September 2014 and December 2018. Regression analysis and the differential timing of inspections is used to identify the impact on prescribing. RESULTS: Better-rated practices had better prescribing in the period before inspections began. In the six months following inspections, no overall change in prescribing was observed. However, the differences between the best and worse rated practices were reduced but not fully. The same is also true when taking a longer-term view. There is little evidence that practices responded in anticipation of inspection or reacted differently once the ratings were made public. CONCLUSION: While some of the observed historic variation in prescribing behaviour has been lessened by the process of inspection and ratings, we find this change is small and appears to come from both improvements among lower-rated practices and deteriorations among higher-rated practices. While inspection and rating no doubt had other impacts, these prescribing indicators were largely unchanged.


Subject(s)
Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Primary Health Care , Humans , England , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Primary Health Care/standards , Longitudinal Studies , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Quality of Health Care/standards , Hypnotics and Sedatives/therapeutic use , General Practice/standards
8.
Drug Des Devel Ther ; 18: 1711-1725, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38799798

ABSTRACT

Imrecoxib, a cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), was discovered via the balanced inhibition strategy of COX-1/COX-2. It is indicated for the relief of painful symptoms of osteoarthritis. There have been some pharmacological and therapeutic advances since the approval of imrecoxib in 2011. However, an update review in this aspect is not yet available. Relevant literature until January 2024 was identified by search of PubMed, Web of science, Embase and CNKI. From the perspective of efficacy, imrecoxib provides relief of osteoarthritis symptoms, and potential off-label use for treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, perioperative pain, hand-foot syndrome, axial spondyloarthritis, COVID-19, cartilage injury, and malignancies such as lung and colon cancer. From a safety point of view, imrecoxib showed adverse effects common to NSAIDs; however, it has lower incidence of new-onset hypertension than other types of selective COX-2 inhibitors, less gastrointestinal toxicities than non-selective NSAIDs, weaker risk of drug interaction than celecoxib, and more suitable for elderly patients due to balanced inhibition of COX-1/COX-2. From a pharmacoeconomic perspective, imrecoxib is more cost-effective than celecoxib and diclofenac for osteoarthritis patients. With the deepening of the disease pathophysiology study of osteoarthritis, new therapeutic schemes and pharmacological mechanisms are constantly discovered. In the field of osteoarthritis treatment, mechanisms other than the analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects of COX-2 inhibitors are also being explored. Taken together, imrecoxib is a moderate selective COX-2 inhibitor with some advantages, and there would be more clinical applications and research opportunities in the future.


Subject(s)
Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors , Osteoarthritis , Humans , Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors/adverse effects , Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors/pharmacology , Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Osteoarthritis/drug therapy , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/pharmacology , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Cyclooxygenase 2/metabolism , Animals
9.
FP Essent ; 540: 16-23, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38767885

ABSTRACT

Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) involves ulceration of the mucosa in the stomach and/or proximal duodenum. The main causes are Helicobacter pylori infection and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use. PUD occurs in 5% to 10% of people worldwide, but rates have decreased by more than half during the past 20 years. This reduction is thought to be because of H pylori management, more conservative use of NSAIDs, and/or widespread use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Common symptoms include postprandial abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and weight loss. These symptoms have broad overlap with those of other conditions, making clinical diagnosis difficult. Endoscopy is the gold standard for diagnosis, especially in older patients and those with alarm symptoms, but a test-and-treat strategy (noninvasive test for H pylori and treat if positive) can be used for younger patients with no alarm symptoms. Numerous treatment regimens are available, all of which include PPIs plus antibiotics. As an alternative to PPIs, a new triple therapy with vonoprazan (which blocks acid production) plus antibiotics has been approved and appears to be superior to conventional therapy with PPIs plus antibiotics. At least 4 weeks after treatment, repeat testing for H pylori should be obtained to confirm cure. When possible, NSAIDs should be discontinued; when not possible, antisecretory cotherapy should be considered.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal , Helicobacter Infections , Helicobacter pylori , Peptic Ulcer , Proton Pump Inhibitors , Humans , Peptic Ulcer/diagnosis , Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Helicobacter Infections/diagnosis , Helicobacter Infections/drug therapy , Helicobacter Infections/complications , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Therapy, Combination , Sulfonamides/therapeutic use , Pyrroles
11.
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 18(4-5): 203-215, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38725175

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of the different pharmacological agents in preventing post-ERCP acute pancreatitis. METHODS: We included clinical trials of pharmacological interventions for prophylaxis of acute post-ERCP pancreatitis. The event evaluated was acute pancreatitis. We conducted a search strategy in MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to nowadays. We reported the information in terms of relative risks (RR) with a 95% confidence interval. We assessed the heterogeneity using the I2 test. RESULTS: We included 84 studies for analysis (30,463 patients). The mean age was 59.3 years (SD ± 7.01). Heterogeneity between studies was low (I2 = 34.4%) with no inconsistencies (p = 0.2567). Post ERCP pancreatitis was less in prophylaxis with NSAIDs (RR 0.65 95% CI [0.52 to 0.80]), aggressive hydration with Lactate Ringer (RR 0.32 95% CI [0.12-0.86]), NSAIDs + isosorbide dinitrate (RR 0.28 95% CI [0.11-0.71]) and somatostatin and analogues (RR 0.54 [0.43 to 0.68]) compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: NSAIDs, the Combination of NSAIDs + isosorbide dinitrate, somatostatin and analogues, and aggressive hydration with lactate ringer are pharmacological strategies that can prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis when compared to placebo. More clinical trials are required to determine the effectiveness of these drugs.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde , Pancreatitis , Aged , Humans , Middle Aged , Acute Disease , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde/adverse effects , Fluid Therapy/methods , Network Meta-Analysis , Pancreatitis/prevention & control , Pancreatitis/etiology , Ringer's Lactate/therapeutic use , Ringer's Lactate/administration & dosage , Risk Factors , Somatostatin/analogs & derivatives , Somatostatin/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
12.
Int J Mol Sci ; 25(10)2024 May 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38791116

ABSTRACT

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is characterized by continuous mucosal ulceration of the colon, starting in the rectum. 5-Aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) is the main therapy for ulcerative colitis; however, it has side effects. Physical exercise effectively increases the number of anti-inflammatory and anti-immune cells in the body. In the current study, the effects of simultaneous treatment of treadmill exercise and 5-ASA were compared with monotherapy with physical exercise or 5-ASA in UC mice. To induce the UC animal model, the mice consumed 2% dextran sulfate sodium dissolved in drinking water for 7 days. The mice in the exercise groups exercised on a treadmill for 1 h once a day for 14 days after UC induction. The 5-ASA-treated groups received 5-ASA by enema injection using a 200 µL polyethylene catheter once a day for 14 days. Simultaneous treatment improved histological damage and increased body weight, colon weight, and colon length, whereas the disease activity index score and collagen deposition were decreased. Simultaneous treatment with treadmill exercise and 5-ASA suppressed pro-inflammatory cytokines and apoptosis following UC. The benefits of this simultaneous treatment may be due to inhibition on nuclear factor-κB/mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling activation. Based on this study, simultaneous treatment of treadmill exercise and 5-ASA can be considered as a new therapy of UC.


Subject(s)
Colitis, Ulcerative , Disease Models, Animal , Mesalamine , Physical Conditioning, Animal , Animals , Mesalamine/therapeutic use , Mesalamine/pharmacology , Colitis, Ulcerative/therapy , Colitis, Ulcerative/drug therapy , Colitis, Ulcerative/chemically induced , Colitis, Ulcerative/pathology , Mice , Male , Colon/pathology , Colon/drug effects , Colon/metabolism , Dextran Sulfate , NF-kappa B/metabolism , Cytokines/metabolism , Apoptosis/drug effects , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/pharmacology , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use
14.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ; 15: 1384365, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38715797

ABSTRACT

Importance: Subacute thyroiditis (SAT) is a self-limiting and inflammatory thyroid disease. Although SAT usually improves on its own within weeks, it needs treatment when patients have pain, fever, and symptoms of thyrotoxicosis. Therapeutic drugs mainly include non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and glucocorticoids. Currently, there is no systematic review or meta-analysis of the comparison of outcomes between NSAIDs and glucocorticoids for the treatment of SAT. Objectives: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on the outcomes in subacute thyroiditis patients treated with glucocorticoids or NSAIDs. Data sources: Using the four electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Wanfang database and Web of Science. All publications until 21 June 2023 were searched. The reference lists of all selected articles were independently screened to identify additional studies left out in the initial search. Study selection: The literature comparing outcomes between glucocorticoids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for patients with subacute thyroiditis will be included. Data extraction and synthesis: Two independent investigators (Anqi Yuan and Jialu Wu) extracted the data following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines (PRISMA) and then evaluated the quality of the eligible studies with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Fixed-effects models for the meta-analyses were applied. Heterogeneity was assessed with the chi-squared (x²) test (Cochran's Q) and inconsistency index (I²). The robustness of the results was tested with the sensitivity analyses. The bias of publication was assessed with the Harbord test. Main outcomes and measures: The incidence of permanent hypothyroidism in SAT patients treated with corticosteroids or NSAIDs. Results: Our study included a total of ten comparative cohort studies with 1337 participants. We found that the incidence of developing permanent hypothyroidism in the SAT patients who received glucocorticoids treatment was significantly lower than those who received NSAIDs treatment. (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.36-0.88; P = 0.01). The risk of permanent hypothyroidism in patients who received prednisone at an average initial dose < 40 mg/d was significantly lower than that in patients who received NSAIDs (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.14-0.94; P = 0.04). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of permanent hypothyroidism between SAT patients who received an average initial dose ≥ 40 mg/d of prednisone and those who received only NSAIDs (OR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.14-3.53; P = 0.67). In addition, the recurrence rate was observably higher in those receiving glucocorticoids than in those receiving NSAIDs (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.12-3.5; p = 0.02). The recurrence rate was significantly higher in patients with an average initial prednisone dose of < 40 mg/d than in the NSAIDs group. There was no significant difference in the recurrence rate between patients in the mean initial prednisone dose ≥ 40 mg/d group and those in the NSAIDs group. Conclusions and relevance: In this meta-analysis, we compared the treatment outcomes of SAT patients between glucocorticoids and NSAIDs. Our results indicated that glucocorticoid treatment was associated with a lower incidence of permanent hypothyroidism than NSAID treatment. Patients treated with NSAIDs might have a lower recurrence rate. This finding might help to understand the outcome of the disease when choosing different drugs and help physicians to make appropriate decisions. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023427332.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal , Glucocorticoids , Thyroiditis, Subacute , Humans , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Thyroiditis, Subacute/drug therapy , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Glucocorticoids/adverse effects , Glucocorticoids/administration & dosage , Treatment Outcome
15.
World J Gastroenterol ; 30(19): 2505-2511, 2024 May 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38817656

ABSTRACT

Chronic enteropathy associated with the SLCO2A1 gene (CEAS) is a complex gastroenterological condition characterized by multiple ulcers in the small intestine with chronic bleeding and protein loss. This review explores the potential mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of CEAS, focusing on the role of SLCO2A1-encoded prostaglandin transporter OATP2A1 and its impact on prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) levels. Studies have suggested that elevated PGE2 levels contribute to mucosal damage, inflammation, and disruption of the intestinal barrier. The effects of PGE2 on macrophage activation and Maxi-Cl channel functionality, as well as its interaction with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs play crucial roles in the progression of CEAS. Understanding the balance between its protective and pro-inflammatory effects and the complex interactions within the gastrointestinal tract can shed light on potential therapeutic targets for CEAS and guide the development of novel, targeted therapies.


Subject(s)
Dinoprostone , Intestinal Mucosa , Organic Anion Transporters , Humans , Organic Anion Transporters/genetics , Organic Anion Transporters/metabolism , Intestinal Mucosa/pathology , Intestinal Mucosa/metabolism , Chronic Disease , Dinoprostone/metabolism , Intestine, Small/pathology , Intestine, Small/metabolism , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Intestinal Diseases/genetics , Intestinal Diseases/pathology , Animals , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/genetics , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/etiology , Ulcer/genetics , Ulcer/pathology
16.
Int Immunopharmacol ; 134: 112255, 2024 Jun 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38744176

ABSTRACT

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is distinguished by persistent immune-mediated inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract. Previous experimental investigations have shown encouraging outcomes for the use of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-based therapy in the treatment of IBD. However, as a primary medication for IBD patients, there is limited information regarding the potential interaction between 5-aminosalicylates (5-ASA) and MSCs. In this present study, we employed the dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced ulcerative colitis (UC) mouse model to examine the influence of a combination of MSCs and 5-ASA on the development of UC. The mice were subjected to weight measurement, DAI scoring, assessment of calprotectin expression, and collection of colons for histological examination. The findings revealed that both 5-ASA and MSCs have demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of UC. However, it is noteworthy that 5-ASA exhibits a quicker onset of action, while MSCs demonstrate more advantageous and enduring therapeutic effects. Additionally, the combination of 5-ASA and MSC treatment shows a less favorable efficacy compared to the MSCs alone group. Moreover, our study conducted in vitro revealed that 5-ASA could promote MSC migration, but it could also inhibit MSC proliferation, induce apoptosis, overexpress inflammatory factors (IL-2, IL-12P70, and TNF-α), and reduce the expression of PD-L1 and PD-L2. Furthermore, a significant decrease in the viability of MSCs within the colon was observed as a result of 5-ASA induction. These findings collectively indicate that the use of 5-ASA has the potential to interfere with the therapeutic efficacy of MSC transplantation for the treatment of IBD.


Subject(s)
Colitis, Ulcerative , Dextran Sulfate , Disease Models, Animal , Mesalamine , Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation , Mesenchymal Stem Cells , Animals , Colitis, Ulcerative/therapy , Colitis, Ulcerative/drug therapy , Colitis, Ulcerative/immunology , Colitis, Ulcerative/pathology , Colitis, Ulcerative/chemically induced , Mesalamine/pharmacology , Mesalamine/therapeutic use , Mesenchymal Stem Cells/drug effects , Mesenchymal Stem Cells/metabolism , Mice , Humans , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Colon/pathology , Colon/drug effects , Colon/immunology , Cells, Cultured , Male , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/pharmacology , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use
17.
J Clin Pediatr Dent ; 48(3): 15-23, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38755977

ABSTRACT

Postoperative pain is generally a novel experience among paediatric patients. Topical anaesthetics, distraction procedures, and buffering of anaesthetic solutions have been used in reducing the postoperative pain. In this review, the authors assessed various modalities used to alleviate postoperative pain in children's dental treatment under general anaesthesia. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) protocol were strictly adhered to in this systematic review. Specific keywords including postoperative pain, general anaesthesia, children, and dental extraction were used in the search for relevant randomized control trial studies in Web of Science, Scopus and PubMed, and included articles published until June 2021. From a total of 191 abstracts, 21 were reviewed. From the six studies with the usage of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) alone or in combination with paracetamol, four observed that the preoperative use of NSAIDs alone or in combination was better than paracetamol alone, one discovered preoperative intravenous paracetamol was better than postoperative intravenous paracetamol, and the remaining study found no difference among various groups. Of two studies comparing the usage of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with opioid analgesics, one stated intravenous fentanyl in combination was better, while the other study found no difference among groups. The results obtained in this review can be utilized by physicians to control postoperative pain in children undergoing dental treatment under general anaesthesia.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, General , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal , Pain, Postoperative , Humans , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Child , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Dental Care for Children/methods , Acetaminophen/therapeutic use , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Anesthesia, Dental/methods , Tooth Extraction
18.
Ann Med ; 56(1): 2357235, 2024 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38813682

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Tension-type headache is the most common type of primary headache and results in a huge socioeconomic burden. This network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of simple analgesics for the treatment of episodic tension-type headache (ETTH) in adults. METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Chinese BioMedical Literature database and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform databases for eligible randomized clinical trials reporting the efficacy and/or safety of simple analgesics. A Bayesian NMA was performed to compare relative efficacy and safety. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was calculated to rank interventions. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018090554. RESULTS: We highlighted six studies including 3507 patients. For the 2 h pain-free rate, the SUCRA ranking was ibuprofen > diclofenac-K > ketoprofen > acetaminophen > naproxen > placebo. All drugs except naproxen reported a higher 2 h pain-free rate than placebo, with a risk ratio (RR) of 2.86 (95% credible interval, CrI: 1.62-5.42) for ibuprofen and 2.61 (1.53-4.88) for diclofenac-K. For adverse events rate, the SUCRA ranking was: metamizol > diclofenac-K > ibuprofen > lumiracoxib > placebo > aspirin > acetaminophen > naproxen > ketoprofen. The adverse event rates of all analgesics were no higher than those of placebo, except for ketoprofen. Moreover, all drugs were superior to placebo in the global assessment of efficacy. In particular, the RR of lumiracoxib was 2.47 (1.57-4.57). Global heterogeneity I2 between the studies was low. CONCLUSIONS: Simple analgesics are considered more effective and safe as a placebo for ETTH in adults. Our results suggest that ibuprofen and diclofenac-K may be the two best treatment options for patients with ETTH from a comprehensive point of view (both high-quality evidence).


To our knowledge, this is the first network meta-analysis comparing the available data on adult patients with episodic tension-type headache (ETTH) treated with different simple analgesics recommended by the current guidelines.Ibuprofen (400 mg) and diclofenac-K (12.5 mg, 25 mg) are potentially the most effective and safe treatment options, supported by high-quality evidence.


Subject(s)
Analgesics , Ibuprofen , Network Meta-Analysis , Tension-Type Headache , Humans , Tension-Type Headache/drug therapy , Analgesics/adverse effects , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Analgesics/administration & dosage , Adult , Ibuprofen/adverse effects , Ibuprofen/administration & dosage , Ibuprofen/therapeutic use , Acetaminophen/therapeutic use , Acetaminophen/adverse effects , Acetaminophen/administration & dosage , Bayes Theorem , Treatment Outcome , Diclofenac/adverse effects , Diclofenac/therapeutic use , Diclofenac/administration & dosage , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Naproxen/therapeutic use , Naproxen/adverse effects , Naproxen/administration & dosage , Ketoprofen/adverse effects , Ketoprofen/therapeutic use , Ketoprofen/administration & dosage , Ketoprofen/analogs & derivatives , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Female , Male
19.
Am Fam Physician ; 109(5): 441-446, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38804758

ABSTRACT

Acute pericarditis is defined as inflammation of the pericardium and occurs in approximately 4.4% of patients who present to the emergency department for nonischemic chest pain, with a higher prevalence in men. Although there are numerous etiologies of pericarditis, most episodes are idiopathic and the cause is presumed to be viral. Diagnosis of pericarditis requires at least two of the following criteria: new or worsening pericardial effusion, characteristic pleuritic chest pain, pericardial friction rub, or electrocardiographic changes, including new, widespread ST elevations or PR depressions. Pericardial friction rubs are highly specific but transient, and they have been reported in 18% to 84% of patients with acute pericarditis. Classic electrocardiographic findings include PR-segment depressions; diffuse, concave, upward ST-segment elevations without reciprocal changes; and T-wave inversions. Transthoracic echocardiography should be performed in all patients with acute pericarditis to characterize the size of effusions and evaluate for complications. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are the first-line treatment option. Glucocorticoids should be reserved for patients with contraindications to first-line therapy and those who are pregnant beyond 20 weeks' gestation or have other systemic inflammatory conditions. Colchicine should be used in combination with first- or second-line treatments to reduce the risk of recurrence. Patients with a higher risk of complications should be admitted to the hospital for further workup and treatment.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal , Electrocardiography , Pericarditis , Humans , Pericarditis/diagnosis , Pericarditis/physiopathology , Pericarditis/therapy , Acute Disease , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Colchicine/therapeutic use , Echocardiography , Female , Pericardial Effusion/diagnosis , Pericardial Effusion/therapy , Pericardial Effusion/etiology , Chest Pain/etiology , Chest Pain/diagnosis , Male , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use
20.
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol ; 69: 101906, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38749582

ABSTRACT

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a common endoscopic procedure which plays a key role in the management of diseases of the bile ducts and the pancreas. Despite ERCP being performed routinely since more than 4 decades, it is still related to a considerable rate of complications with post-ERCP pancreatitis being the most frequent one. Lately, endoscopic techniques have evolved, and numerous modalities have been developed to prevent or manage ERCP-related complications, especially PEP, such as the use of intra-rectal non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), insertion of prophylactic stents in the pancreatic duct (PD) or intravenous hyperhydration. Knowledge of the various risk factors and applying validated preventive methods are keys in providing a safe procedure and optimizing overall patient care.


Subject(s)
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde , Pancreatitis , Humans , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde/adverse effects , Pancreatitis/prevention & control , Pancreatitis/etiology , Risk Factors , Stents
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL