Development of a questionnaire to assess the patient perspective regarding challenges in psoriatic arthritis treatment-a mixed-methods study.

BACKGROUND: Limited data exist on psoriatic arthritis (PsA) treatment in lower-income regions, particularly from the patient perspective. This study explores the challenges faced by socioeconomically vulnerable PsA patients and the reasons for non-adherence to treatment guidelines. The main objective of the study is to develop a questionnaire to identify the primary challenges in PsA treatment adherence and to analyze its feasibility while simultaneously understanding the target population's unique characteristics. METHODS: We included PsA patients meeting the Classification Criteria for PsA (CASPAR), excluding those with other overlapping inflammatory diseases. The study, supported by two patient-research partners, began with focus groups to identify treatment challenges, leading to the creation of a 26-item questionnaire. Its reliability was verified using the test-retest method, targeting a percent agreement ≥ 0.8. Then, PsA patients at a rheumatology clinic completed the final survey. RESULTS: The study involved 69 PsA patients. The final questionnaire contained 26-questions across five-domains, with a 92.2% agreement rate and an average completion time of 8.3 minutes. Diagnostic delays exceeded a year for 59% of patients and more than two years for 33%. Daily life disruptions affected 43.2% of patients, with 35.3% taking sick leave or retiring. Around 25% waited over 8 weeks for drug approval, and 17.6% required legal intervention to access medication. Drug dispensation issues impacted about 60% of patients. Furthermore, 66.7% lived far from their rheumatologist, with 49% traveling over an hour for appointments. Approximately 30% were unaware of the risks of methotrexatein relation to alcohol consumption and pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: The questionnaire was feasible and reliable, with its results underscoring patient-centric challenges in PsA management, particularly concerning diagnostic delays and medication access, as well as daily life disruptions and misinformation. These findings emphasize the urgency for healthcare reforms aimed at improving diagnosis efficiency, patient education, and streamlined medication access, emphasizing the need for tailored initiatives to improve the healthcare experience for PsA patients.

Perspectives of Japanese patients on psoriatic disease burden: Results from "Psoriasis and Beyond," the Global Psoriatic Disease Survey.

Psoriatic disease (PsD) is a chronic disease affecting skin (psoriasis) and joints (psoriatic arthritis, PsA) that has a significant impact on patients' quality of life (QOL). We report findings from the Japanese subgroup of patients included in Psoriasis and Beyond: The Global Psoriatic Disease Survey, a cross-sectional, quantitative online survey of patients with self-reported, healthcare professional (HCP)-diagnosed, moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, with or without PsA. Eligible patients who were recruited online completed a 25-min internet-based survey in Japanese. We assessed patients' understanding of the systemic nature of PsD, disease burden, perception towards their HCPs, treatment expectations, and satisfaction with care. Of the 148 patients, 74% were females. In total, 65% of patients were aware of the systemic nature of their disease. A minority of patients (27%) were aware that PsA was related to their psoriasis, and 30% and 42% of patients were unaware of any manifestations and comorbidities, respectively, related to PsD. Overall, 21% of patients reported that their disease has a "very large" to "extremely large" impact on their QOL (assessed by Dermatology Life Quality Index score), while the majority (61%) reported a "small" effect or "no effect" at all on QOL. Patients experienced stigma and discrimination and had a negative impact on relationships due to PsD. More patients with psoriasis and concomitant PsA (66%) were satisfied with their current treatment than those with psoriasis alone (46%). Overall, 41% of patients were not involved in deciding their treatment goals. These results suggest that Japanese patients may not be fully aware of the systemic nature of PsD, its manifestations and comorbidities. While these patients were somewhat satisfied with their current treatment, they were only occasionally consulted in deciding treatment goals. Policy measures are required to address the stigma and discrimination experienced by patients. Increased patient participation in their care supports shared decision-making and enhanced treatment outcomes.

Prevalence and Incidence of Psoriatic Arthritis among Patients with Psoriasis and Risk Factors for Psoriatic Arthritis in Republic of Korea: A Nationwide Database Cohort Study.

Population-based epidemiological studies on disease burden and risk factors for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in patients with psoriasis (PsO) are limited, especially in Asian populations. Therefore, the aim was to determine the prevalence and incidence of PsA among PsO patients in Korea, and examine associated clinical factors. A cohort study was performed to determine the annual prevalence and incidence of PsA among PsO patients between 2008 and 2020 using nationwide claims data in Korea. Risk factors for PsA development were also examined using logistic regression among matched PsA cases and controls. An increasing trend in PsA prevalence per 1,000 patients was observed; prevalence was 6.17 (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.73-6.65) in 2008 and 19.03 (95% CI 18.39-19.70) in 2020. Similarly, the PsA incidence rate per 1,000 patient-years increased from 3.35 (95% CI 3.01-3.72) in 2008 to 5.01 (95% CI 4.68-5.36) in 2020. Patients with plaque PsO, moderate-to severe PsO, receiving oral systemic therapy or phototherapy, with a higher burden of comorbidities, and concomitant autoimmune diseases had a higher risk of PsA. The results provide insight into the burden of PsA among PsO patients in Korea and risk factors associated with developing PsA.

Breakout Session and Report Back: Collaboration of Rheumatologists and Dermatologists for the Care of Patients With Psoriatic Disease.

Multidisciplinary care is essential for the management of patients with psoriatic disease (PsD), considering the great range of cutaneous and musculoskeletal symptoms and the potential for associated comorbidities and extraarticular manifestations. Consequently, combined rheumatology/dermatology clinics represent a gold standard model of care for patients with PsD. Many challenges are associated with the establishment of these clinics in routine clinical practice. In this report, we describe the thoughts and debates within a collaborative care breakout session during the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) 2023 annual meeting. The breakout discussion focused around 3 main topics: (1) challenges of dermatologist-rheumatologist collaboration; (2) innovative approaches to encourage collaboration; and (3) how to identify patients with psoriasis at high risk of developing PsA.

A novel nomogram to predict psoriatic arthritis in patients with plaque psoriasis.

OBJECTIVE: To construct a predictive model for Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) based on clinical and ultrasonic characteristics in patients with plaque psoriasis (PsP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Demographic, clinical, and ultrasound data were collected from patients with PsP and PsA between May 2019 and December 2022. RESULTS: A total of 212 patients with PsP and 123 with PsA in the training cohort, whereas the validation cohort comprised 91 patients with PsP and 49 with PsA. The multivariate logistic regression identified nail psoriasis (odds ratio [OR] 1.88, 95% CI: 1.07-3.29), synovitis (OR 18.23, 95% CI: 4.04-82.33), enthesitis (OR 3.71, 95% CI: 1.05-13.14), and bone erosion (OR 11.39, 95% CI: 3.05-42.63) as effective predictors for PsA. The area under the curve was 0.750 (95% CI, 0.691-0.806) and 0.804 (95% CI, 0.723-0.886) for the training and validation cohorts, respectively. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test showed good consistency for both the training cohort (p  =  0.970) and the validation cohort (p  =  0.967). Calibration curves also indicated good calibration for both cohorts. The DCA revealed that the predictive model had good clinical utility. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a quantitative, intuitive, and convenient predictive model based on nail psoriasis, synovitis, enthesitis, and bone erosion to assess the risk of PsA in patients with plaque psoriasis.

Core items to be included in a definition of moderate psoriatic arthritis: literature review and expert opinion.

Evidence-based treatment recommendations for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) suggest that treatment should be individualised but acknowledge the difficulty of correctly defining levels of activity (mild, moderate and severe). The aim of this study was to define the parameters or disease characteristics that should be included in a future definition of moderate PsA. Mixed. methods: (1) literature review to identify previous assessment tools used to classify patients into mild, moderate and severe forms, and (2) survey of rheumatologists, and experts in PsA, to obtain their opinion on the degree of validation and applicability of published definitions and tools, and on the parameters that should be included in a future definition of moderate PsA. We propose eight domains/items to be included in a definition of moderate PsA: number of active joints and inflamed entheses, physician global assessment (by visual analogue scale), dactylitis, body surface area (BSA) affected by psoriasis, psoriasis in special locations, and absence of hip involvement. The Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) score would be supported as part of this definition, as would the Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID) index. This study proposes a set of items/domains to be included in a definition of moderate PsA based on literature and expert opinion, which can be the starting point for further development and validation studies of the proposed items.

Early psoriatic arthritis: clinical and therapeutic challenges.

INTRODUCTION: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic immunoinflammatory disease of the enthesis and adjacent synovium, skin, and nail, which early diagnosis may be crucial for starting a prompt therapeutic intervention. Theoretically, early treatment offers the advantage of acting on the reduction of the articular damage progression since initial phases of the disease. AREAS COVERED: This review explores the challenges of clinical-diagnostic aspects and the underlying pathophysiology of early PsA phases, as well as the evidence evaluating the impact of early intervention on disease outcomes. EXPERT OPINION: Main instruments for early PsA diagnosis include recognizing synovial-entheseal inflammatory signs at onset, improving screening PsA high-risk subjects, and increasing disease knowledge of physicians and patients with psoriasis or familial history. PsA continues to significantly impact on the Quality of Life of patients affected by the disease, making necessary to deeply study clinical manifestations, risk factors, and underlying immunoinflammatory mechanisms, as well as to identify biomarkers for early identification. Additionally, it remains a need to increase more evidence on understanding how early treatment of PsA and of psoriasis might influence the course of the disease.

Introducing New GRAPPA Projects.

Every year at the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) annual meeting, new project ideas are presented and discussed with a view to obtaining feedback and support. Arising from previous work, a project proposal was presented at the 2023 meeting; the project aims to improve early diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) by comparing a physician-based vs a patient questionnaire-based approach. This project has received the backing of the GRAPPA research committee, but additional funding will be required. A second project, approved by GRAPPA, was presented on delivering an epidemiology training module before the GRAPPA annual meeting in 2024, which will target both established GRAPPA clinicians and trainees. Attendance at such a module would enhance the quality of research in psoriatic disease.

The Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) Celebrates Its 20th Anniversary.

The Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) started in August 2003 with 40 initial participants and celebrated its 20th anniversary with 1036 members, many of whom attended the annual meeting in Dublin, Ireland, on July 15 to 17, 2023. GRAPPA arose from a need experienced by psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and psoriasis (PsO) investigators to meet to address questions related to psoriatic disease (PsD). Though other groups were meeting at the time to classify and discuss PsA, GRAPPA arose from a desire to include international clinical and investigational researchers of both dermatology and rheumatology. The organization has built awareness of PsO and PsA, developed and validated research assessment tools to measure clinical status and disease outcomes, published multiple treatment recommendations, supported basic and clinical research on PsD pathophysiology, fostered interactions across research fields, and educated the future generation of PsO and PsA researchers. The group continues to focus on major priorities affecting patients with PsD and will continue evolving in the next decades.

Biomarkers in Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis: Where Are We Now?

At the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) 2023 annual conference and trainee symposium, the status of psoriatic disease (PsD) biomarkers was discussed in a workshop. The significant heterogeneity of PsD causes disease management to be very challenging, but biomarkers can prove helpful in disease diagnosis, stratification, and precision medicine. Although a few potential biomarkers have been discovered, none have been fully validated. Recent studies have used omic technologies that show promise but need further verification and validation. Many challenges remain, but the anticipated results of studies being conducted by recently established large consortia may lead to the identification of clinically actionable biomarkers.

Difficult-to-Treat Concept in Psoriatic Arthritis: Analysis of 2 Potential Definitions in a Large Group of Patients. A Cross-Sectional Study.

OBJECTIVE: The main aim of the study was to evaluate the performance of 2 proposed criteria for difficult-to-treat (D2T) psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in a group of patients and to evaluate the agreement between the 2 sets of criteria. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of 2 longitudinal cohorts of patients with PsA fulfilling the Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR), with at least 1 year of follow-up. A detailed medical history was collected and a physical examination was performed for all recruited patients. The proposed criteria for patients with D2T PsA were applied in our group. To test the performance of the 2 sets of criteria, we used an external validator (absence of patient acceptable symptom state + physician global assessment ≥ 6 cm). Finally, the agreement between the 2 sets of criteria was assessed. RESULTS: We evaluated 378 patients with PsA (219 male/159 female), with a mean age (range) of 58 (19-75) years. Seventy-five (19.8%) patients fulfilled the D2T criteria proposed by Perrotta et al and 58 (15.3%) the D2T criteria proposed by Kumthekar et al. Both criteria showed comparable performance, with low sensitivity (Perrotta: 37.8%, Kumthekar: 29.7%) but good specificity (Perrotta: 82.1%, Kumthekar: 86.2%). Finally, the agreement between the 2 sets of criteria is substantial (Fleiss [Formula: see text] 0.72), suggesting that both criteria identify nearly the same group of patients. CONCLUSION: Our study compared 2 published sets of criteria showing comparable performance and substantial agreement. This study may pave the way for further research in this field.

Composite Outcome Measures for Psoriatic Arthritis: OMERACT and 3 and 4 Visual Analog Scale Progress in 2023.

The Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA)-Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) psoriatic arthritis (PsA) working group provided updates at the GRAPPA 2023 annual meeting on its work to evaluate composite outcome measures for PsA. An ongoing systematic literature review is in progress to evaluate psychometric measurement properties using the OMERACT filter 2.2 for a list of candidate composite outcome measures, which include minimal disease activity (MDA), Disease Activity for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA), American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria, Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS), Composite Psoriatic Disease Activity Index (CPDAI), 3 visual analog scale (3VAS), and 4VAS. The performance of the 3VAS and 4VAS in clinical practice and a synthesis of new data were presented, including estimates for minimal clinically important differences and thresholds of meaning, discrimination and construct validity, and longitudinal construct validity. Numeric rating scale (NRS) versions of the VAS have also been tested. Performance characteristics and psychometric properties are similar to the ASSESS study, a UK multicenter study, indicating that the VAS scales may be feasible tools for routine clinical care with a preference for the 4VAS because of superior face validity and clinical utility.

GRAPPA 2023 Annual Meeting Report: Hot Topic Session on Measurement of Musculoskeletal Symptoms in Psoriatic Disease.

During the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) 2023 annual meeting, the International Dermatology Outcome Measures (IDEOM) psoriatic disease (PsD) workgroup presented an update on their efforts toward measurement of musculoskeletal (MSK) symptoms in patients with PsD. Dr. Joseph Merola initiated the presentation emphasizing the vital importance of assessing MSK symptoms in patients with psoriasis (PsO) regardless of whether they have been diagnosed with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). He also discussed existing challenges for evaluating MSK symptoms in patients with PsO without a PsA diagnosis. Dr. Lourdes Perez-Chada then presented their work on the development and validation of the IDEOM Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (MSK-Q), a patient-reported questionnaire developed by the IDEOM to capture the intensity and impact of MSK symptoms on quality of life in patients with PsO with or without PsA. Dr. Perez-Chada also introduced a set of ongoing studies employing the IDEOM MSK-Q, highlighting the potential effects of the data collected through this innovative tool.

"Inflammatory or non-inflammatory pain in inflammatory arthritis - How to differentiate it?"

Pain is a significant issue in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PSA) and can have a negative impact on patients' quality of life. Despite optimal control of inflammatory disease, residual chronic pain remains a major unmet medical need in RA. Pain in RA can be secondary to inflammation but can also generate neuroendocrine responses that initiate neurogenic inflammation and enhance cytokine release, leading to persistent hyperalgesia. In addition to well-known cytokines such as TNFα and IL-6, other cytokines and the JAK-STAT pathway play a role in pain modulation and inflammation. The development of chronic pain in RA involves processes beyond inflammation or structural damage. Residual pain is often observed in patients even after achieving remission or low disease activity, suggesting the involvement of non-inflammatory and central sensitization mechanisms. Moreover, fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is prevalent in RA patients and may contribute to persistent pain. Factors such as depression, sleep disturbance, and pro-inflammatory cytokines may contribute to the development of fibromyalgia in RA. It is essential to identify and diagnose concomitant FMS in RA patients to better manage their symptoms. Further research is needed to unravel the complexities of pain in RA. Finally, recent studies have shown that JAK inhibitors effectively reduce residual pain in RA patients, suggesting pain-reducing effects independent of their anti-inflammatory properties.

Deep learning-based classification of erosion, synovitis and osteitis in hand MRI of patients with inflammatory arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To train, test and validate the performance of a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based approach for the automated assessment of bone erosions, osteitis and synovitis in hand MRI of patients with inflammatory arthritis. METHODS: Hand MRIs (coronal T1-weighted, T2-weighted fat-suppressed, T1-weighted fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced) of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients from the rheumatology department of the Erlangen University Hospital were assessed by two expert rheumatologists using the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-validated RA MRI Scoring System and PsA MRI Scoring System scores and were used to train, validate and test CNNs to automatically score erosions, osteitis and synovitis. Scoring performance was compared with human annotations in terms of macro-area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and balanced accuracy using fivefold cross-validation. Validation was performed on an independent dataset of MRIs from a second patient cohort. RESULTS: In total, 211 MRIs from 112 patients (14 906 region of interests (ROIs)) were included for training/internal validation using cross-validation and 220 MRIs from 75 patients (11 040 ROIs) for external validation of the networks. The networks achieved high mean (SD) macro-AUC of 92%±1% for erosions, 91%±2% for osteitis and 85%±2% for synovitis. Compared with human annotation, CNNs achieved a high mean Spearman correlation for erosions (90±2%), osteitis (78±8%) and synovitis (69±7%), which remained consistent in the validation dataset. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a CNN-based automated scoring system that allowed a rapid grading of erosions, osteitis and synovitis with good diagnostic accuracy and using less MRI sequences compared with conventional scoring. This CNN-based approach may help develop standardised cost-efficient and time-efficient assessments of hand MRIs for patients with arthritis.

[Clinical and instrumental characteristics of psoriatic arthritis in men and women. Data from a cohort observational study].

AIM: To study and compare the clinical and imaging characteristics of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in men and women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 956 PsA patients observed in the Russian register, 411 (43%) men and 545 (57%) women. The average age of men/women was 46.0±16.50/50.7±17.20 years (p<0.001), the duration of PsA was 9.9±6.4/10.3±7.6 years (p>0.05), the age at the time of PsA establishment was 37.1±12.30/41.8±13.5 years (p<0.001). Rheumatological examination, X-ray of the pelvis, hands, feet were performed, the LEI, plantar fascia tenderness, body surface area (BSA), body mass index (BMI), CRP, HLA-B27 were determined. Patients filled out assessment scales of pain (Pain), disease activity (patient global assessment of disease activity - PGA), questionnaires HAQ-DI. The indices of Disease Activity in PSoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), criteria of minimal disease activity (MDA) were evaluated. RESULTS: The following differences in the course of PsA in men/women were revealed: X-ray sacroiliitis was detected in 175 (42.6%)/153 (28.1%); p<0.001; the presence of erosions of the joints of the hands and feet - 138 (33.6%)/170 (31.2%); p=0.435; LEI≥3 - 34 (11.4%)/78 (20.9%); p=0.001; Pain - at 48.5±22.60/51.5±22.80 mm VAS; p=0.043; PGA - 50.2±23.07/54.0±21.91 mm VAS; p=0.010; moderate and severe functional disorders (HAQ-DI) were more often observed in women (p=0.002 and p<0.001, respectively); the average value of DAPSA is 26.4±16.8/31.9±22.58; p<0.001; average BASDAI value: 2.7±2.83/1.8±2.78; p<0.001; MDA was achieved in 13 (3.2%)/22 (4.1%); p=0.486; BSA>10% - 54 (13.1%)/102 (18.7%); p=0.021; comorbid diseases - 154 (37%)/277 (51%); p<0.001. At the time of inclusion in the register, the proportion of patients receiving biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs was higher in the group of men. CONCLUSION: Our data, based on a large cohort study, demonstrate that PsA debuts in women at a later age than in men, the course of the disease is characterized by higher activity of peripheral arthritis, more pronounced functional disorders and a high prevalence of comorbid diseases. This creates a heavier burden of PsA in women and indicates that gender is an important characteristic of the patient that should be used to predict the course, therapeutic response and progression of the disease.

[Hypogonadism in men with inflammatory joint diseases: Frequency and clinical characteristics].

AIM: To study the frequency of hypogonadism (HG) in men with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and to evaluate the impact of HG on the course of RA and and concomitant diseases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-stage continuous study included 170 men with RA, 57 men with AS and 85 men with PsA, who were hospitalized at the Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology. Patients were assessed for total testosterone (ТS) levels and subsequently divided into subgroups with normal (>12 nmol/l) and reduced levels. An intergroup comparison was carried out on the main indicators used in clinical rheumatological practice to assess the stage, activity and other medical and demographic characteristics of rheumatic disease, as well as on concomitant conditions. The second stage of the study involved a pairwise intergroup comparison among patients with HG with RA, AS and PsA. RESULTS: The incidence of ТS deficiency among patients with RA was 24.1%, among patients with AS - 17.5%, and with PsA - 31.8%. In patients with RA, HG was associated with a significantly higher mean body mass index, higher fasting blood glucose and uric acid, higher erythrocyte sedimentation rate and anemia. Patients with AS with HG had significantly lower hemoglobin levels and more frequent anemia, as well as higher levels of C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. In PsA, older age was observed in the androgen deficiency group, as well as higher body mass index and fasting glucose levels; obesity was more common. An intergroup comparison of quantitative and qualitative indicators between patients with androgen deficiency in all three rheumatic diseases (RDs) did not reveal significant differences in the average concentrations of ТS, luteinizing hormone, sex hormone binding globulin, experience of RD, laboratory markers of inflammatory activity, as well as glucose and uric acid. A similar incidence of diabetes mellitus, obesity and anemia was noted for all three nosologies. CONCLUSION: ТS levels and the presence of HG were not associated with the stage and activity of RD, but ТS deficiency was accompanied by higher laboratory indicators of inflammatory activity, lower hemoglobin values, and metabolic disorders. Patients with HG, regardless of nosology, had similar levels of sex hormones and indicators reflecting RD and concomitant conditions.

Assessment of Epidemiology and Clinical Profile of Psoriatic Arthritis Patients in India.

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is an inflammatory skin disease associated with significant comorbidity. However, the characteristics of patients with psoriasis are not well documented in India, and a more detailed understanding is needed to delineate the epidemiologic profile at the regional level for better management of psoriasis. Herein, we reported the clinical profile and demographic pattern of psoriasis to further understand its burden in the Indian setting. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study of patients diagnosed with psoriasis who fulfilled the classification criteria for psoriatic arthritis (CASPAR) criteria. Patients were included from the rheumatology outpatient department of Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital and Medical Research Institute in Mumbai, India. The outcomes included demographic and clinical profiles, patterns of joint involvement, and comorbidities associated with psoriasis. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: We enrolled 60 patients, with a mean age of 50.87 years and a higher proportion of females (62%). The majority of patients with less than five joints had associated comorbidities (40 out of 60). Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) occurred in 41 patients [mean ± standard deviation (SD) age of onset-38.88 ± 13.24 years], with the highest occurrence in the 30-50 years (53.3%). The majority of patients with PsA developed it within 2 to ≥5 years of psoriasis occurrence. We did not find any significant correlation between the occurrence of PsA and comorbidities, as well as the duration of PsA and the number of joints (p = 0.152). Pitting and enthesitis were the most common morphological changes noted in almost half of the patients. CONCLUSION: Our study provides an overview of the epidemiologic and clinical characteristics of psoriasis patients in India. These findings could be useful for early diagnosis of PsA and help clinicians in assessing the progression of psoriasis into PsA.