Is microfracture sufficient for high-tibial osteotomy, or should intra-articular hyaluronic acid and oral glucosamine-chondroitin be used as additional treatments?

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the effects of microfracture (MF) versus intra-articular hyaluronic acid (HA) + oral glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate (GC) in addition to MF in patients with osteoarthritic knees who underwent medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) after an average follow-up of five years. METHODS: The study was designed retrospectively and included patients who underwent MOWHTO due to gonarthrosis, the MF method performed on these patients, and HA + GC treatments applied in addition to MF. Three groups consisting of 79 patients were formed: only HTO (Group 1), HTO + MF (Group 2), and HTO + MF + HA + GC (Group 3). The groups were compared using knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and range of motion (ROM). The associations between the degree of correction and function and pain were evaluated. Additionally, the KOOS subparameters were compared between the groups. RESULTS: There were significant improvements in the postoperative KOOS and VAS scores in all three groups (p < 0.05). However, the ROM did not improve in Group 1. There was no significant difference in the postoperative KOOS, VAS, or ROM values ​​between Groups 2 and 3, but these values ​​were significantly better in Groups 2 and 3 than in Group 1 (p < 0.05). When the degree of correction increased, there were no significant positive changes in the postoperative KOOS or VAS score in Group 1, unlike in the other two groups (p < 0.05). In corrections of ≥ 10°, while there was no significant difference in the postoperative KOOS or VAS score ​​between Groups 2 and 3, these parameters significantly improved in these two groups compared to Group 1 (p < 0.05). Among the KOOS subparameters, pain and activities of daily living scores ​​were greater in Groups 2 and 3 than in Group 1 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In MOWHTO, MF is a sufficient treatment method that improves the patient's clinical condition without requiring additional treatments such as HA and GC. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective cohort study.

Comparison of Arthroscopic Microfracture and Retrograde Subchondral Drilling in the Treatment of Osteochondral Lesions of Talus.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: In our study, it was aimed to evaluate the efficacy of microfracture and retrograde subchondral drilling on clinical outcomes in patients who underwent ankle arthroscopy due to osteochondral lesion of medial talus. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty eight patients with osteochondral lesion of talus less than 1.5 cm2 treated with ankle arthroscopy were evaluated retrospectively. Microfracture was performed in 16 patients and retrograde subchondral drilling was performed in 12 patients that there was no loss of integrity in the cartilage layer or cartilage layer is partially preserved during ankle arthroscopy. Postoperative evaluations of the patients were done with Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) and results of both group were compared statistically. RESULTS: The mean activities of daily living scale was 93.4±3.2 and sportive activity scale was 90.1±5.7 in the retrograde drilling group. In the micro-fracture group, mean activities of daily living scale was 93.8±4.1 and mean sportive activity scale was 88.9±9.5. No significant difference was found as a result of statistical comparisons of both groups results. DISCUSSION: It has been determined that the size and preservation of the integrity of talar osteochondral lesions are important factors on clinical results. Results of arthroscopic debridement, microfracture and drilization are not good in lesions larger than 1.5 cm2 and lesions with impaired integrity. In our study, depending on the general literature, osteochondral lesions in talus were less than 1.5 cm2 in patients who underwent arthroscopic micro fracture and retrograde drilling. CONCLUSIONS: Both microfracture and retrograde subchondral drilling are effective treatment methods with good clinical results for talar osteochondral lesions less than 1,5cm2 . Retrograde subchondral drilling can be an alternative treatment method with the reliability of clinical results in patients with no loss of the integrity of the cartilage layer or cartilage layer is partially preserved. KEY WORDS: talus, osteochondral lesion, microfracture, subchondral drilling.

Clinical comprehensive of microfracture, autologous chondrocyte implantation, and periosteum-covered iliac bone grafting for Hepple stage IV-V lesions.

Chronic ankle pain significantly impairs daily activities and athletic performance with osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT) in Hepple stages IV and V, which are often causative factors. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of autologous osteochondral transplantation (AOT) for the treatment of these conditions. This retrospective study was conducted from May 2020 to May 2023 at Cangzhou Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Combined Hospital, including patients with a diagnosis of Hepple stage IV or V OLT confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and arthroscopy. Surgical interventions involved arthroscopic debridement, followed by AOT or limited arthrotomy based on the location and size of the lesion. Preoperative and postoperative evaluations used the Visual Analog Scale, American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale, MRI-Based Cartilage Repair Tissue Scoring, and the International Knee Documentation Committee Knee Evaluation Form. Statistical analysis was conducted using paired-sample t tests to compare the preoperative and postoperative data. Twenty patients were included, revealing significant postoperative improvements in Visual Analog Scale, American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society, and MRI-based cartilage repair tissue scores (P < .05). The radiographic findings suggested effective cartilage regeneration. No adverse effects were observed in the donor knee sites, as confirmed by the stable pre- and postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee Knee Evaluation Form scores. Recovery of physical abilities was achieved on average within 7.3 weeks for daily activities and 13.4 weeks for sports activities. AOT effectively treats Hepple stage IV-V OLT, improves ankle function, promotes cartilage regrowth, and allows quick resumption of daily and athletic activities without compromising donor-site integrity.

Save the subchondral bone plate: Debridement versus bone marrow stimulation in acetabular cartilage defects over 60 months of follow-up.

PURPOSE: Bone marrow stimulation is a common treatment for full-thickness cartilage defects in the hip joint. However, common procedures may result in poor fibrous repair tissue and changes to the subchondral anatomy. This study investigated the clinical outcome of a cohort of International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grades 3 and 4 cartilage defects treated with bone marrow stimulation compared to those who received simple debridement/chondroplasty. METHODS: In this retrospective registry study, 236 patients with uni-focal acetabular chondral lesions of the hip up to 400 mm² (mean 177.4 ± 113.4 mm²) and of ICRS grade ≥3 with follow-up of at least 12 months (mean 33.2 ± 15.3 months) were included. Eighty-one patients underwent bone marrow stimulation (microfracture: n = 44, abrasion: n = 37) besides treatment of the underlying pathology, 155 patients underwent defect debridement/chondroplasty. The patient-reported outcome was measured using the International Hip Outcome Tool 33 (iHOT33) score and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain. RESULTS: iHOT33 and VAS both improved highly statistically significantly (p < 0.001) in the debridement group after 6, 12, 24, 36 and 60 months compared to the preoperative scores, whereas iHOT33 and VAS after microfracture or abrasion did not show statistically significant changes over time. Twenty-four and sixty months postsurgery the debridement group revealed significant higher scores in the iHOT33 compared to the bone marrow stimulation groups. CONCLUSION: Patients with chondral lesions of the hip ≤400 mm2 sustainably benefit from arthroscopic debridement under preservation of the subchondral bone plate in terms of functional outcome and pain in contrast to patients treated with bone marrow stimulation. These findings discourage the currently recommended use of microfracture in the hip joint. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Treatment of Hip Cartilage Defects in Athletes.

Chondral defects in the athlete's hip are a relatively common occurrence, often presenting with debilitating pain and activity limitation. Preoperative identification of cartilage defects is challenging and there are many different modalities for treatment. Nonsurgical interventions, including activity modification, physical therapy, and injections, play a vital role, especially in less severe cases and as adjuncts to surgical intervention. Treating surgeons must be familiar with the cartilage restoration procedures available, including debridement, microfracture, and various implantation and transplantation options. Safe and effective management of cartilage defects is imperative to an athlete's return to sport. It is also imperative that surgeons are aware of all these various treatment options to determine what modality is best for their patients. This review serves to outline these options, cover the published literature, and provide general guidelines for surgeons when they encounter chondral defects in the office and the operating room.

Arthroscopic debridement and microfracture for bilateral osteochondral lesions on the lateral process of the talus involving the subtalar joint: A case report.

RATIONALE: Osteochondral lesions on the lateral process of the talus involving the subtalar joint are rare; the optimal surgical treatment remains to be clarified as there are few reports. Additionally, bilateral cases are extremely rare. Therefore, the clinical outcomes of the surgical treatment for bilateral osteochondral lesions on the lateral process of the talus involving the subtalar joint have not been fully elucidated. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 16-year-old boy who played soccer presented to our hospital with bilateral hindfoot pain. The symptoms persisted even after 3 months of conservative treatment. The patient and family requested surgical treatment to relieve the symptoms. DIAGNOSES: The patient was diagnosed with bilateral osteochondral lesions on the lateral process of the talus, involving the subtalar joint based on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging findings. INTERVENTIONS: Arthroscopic debridement and microfracture were performed bilaterally. OUTCOMES: Postoperative computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of both feet revealed remodeling of the subchondral bone. The patient returned to play at the pre-injury level with no pain. LESSONS: This report describes a case of bilateral osteochondral lesions on the lateral process of the talus, involving the subtalar joint. Arthroscopic debridement and microfracture were effective in relieving symptoms and the subchondral bone remodeling. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of arthroscopic treatment of osteochondral lesions of the lateral process of the talus involving the subtalar joint.

A comparative analysis of 3D bioprinted gelatin-hyaluronic acid-alginate scaffold and microfracture for the management of osteochondral defects in the rabbit knee joint.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to compare the radiological, biomechanical, and histopathological results of microfracture treatment and osteochondral damage repair treatment with a new scaffold product produced by the three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting method containing gelatin-hyaluronic acid-alginate in rabbits with osteochondral damage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A new 3D bioprinted scaffold consisting of gelatin, hyaluronic acid, and alginate designed by us was implanted into the osteochondral defect created in the femoral trochlea of 10 rabbits. By randomization, it was determined which side of 10 rabbits would be repaired with a 3D bioprinted scaffold, and microfracture treatment was applied to the other knees of the rabbits. After six months of follow-up, the rabbits were sacrificed. The results of both treatment groups were compared radiologically, biomechanically, and histopathologically. RESULTS: None of the rabbits experienced any complications. The magnetic resonance imaging evaluation showed that all osteochondral defect areas were integrated with healthy cartilage in both groups. There was no significant difference between the groups in the biomechanical load test (p=0.579). No statistically significant difference was detected in the histological examination using the modified Wakitani scores (p=0.731). CONCLUSION: Our study results showed that 3D bioprinted scaffolds exhibited comparable radiological, biomechanical, and histological properties to the conventional microfracture technique for osteochondral defect treatment.

Return to Sports Activity After Microfracture for Osteochondral Lesion of the Talus in Skeletally Immature Children.

BACKGROUND: Osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs) are among the common sports-related injuries. However, there are few reports on the return to sports after OLT surgery in skeletally immature children. This study was performed to evaluate the return to sports after microfracture for OLTs in skeletally immature children. METHODS: This study involved 17 ankles of 16 patients (mean age, 13.2 years; range, 10-16 years) with open tibial epiphyses on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) who underwent microfracture for OLTs <10 mm in diameter and confirmation of lesion instability under arthroscopy. Nine of 17 ankles had additional lateral ankle ligament stabilization. All patients were participating in some form of sports. The Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot (JSSF) score, Ankle Activity Score (AAS), return to sports rate, lesion size, grade of subchondral bone marrow edema, and Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) score on MRI were evaluated after microfracture. The mean postoperative follow-up period was 53.5 months. RESULTS: The mean JSSF score significantly improved from 76.1 points preoperatively to 94.9 points at the final follow-up (P < .01). The mean AAS showed no change from preoperative state to final follow-up. The return to sports rate was 100%. The lesion size significantly decreased from 76.3 to 56.7 mm2 in area (P = .02) and from 283.2 to 185.6 mm3 in volume (P = .05). The bone marrow edema grade decreased in 8 of 17 ankles. The total MOCART score showed a significant improvement from 6 months to 1 year postoperatively (P = .05). CONCLUSION: All skeletally immature children who underwent microfracture for OLTs in this study were able to return to sports activity and showed improvements in clinical scores and MRI parameters. Microfracture may be considered an effective first-line treatment for OLTs <10 mm in diameter in skeletally immature athletes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case-control study.

A randomized controlled trial demonstrating sustained benefit of autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC®) over microfracture: 10-year follow-up.

PURPOSE: Autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC®) and microfracture are established treatments for focal chondral defects in the knee, but there are little clinical data concerning these procedures over the long term. This study evaluates the outcomes of AMIC® compared to microfracture over 10-year follow-up. METHODS: Forty-seven patients were randomized and treated either with MFx (n = 13), sutured AMIC® (n = 17) or glued AMIC® (n = 17) in a prospective, randomized, controlled multicentre trial. The Modified Cincinnati Knee Score, a visual analogue scale for pain and MOCART score were used to assess outcomes over 10 years post-operatively. RESULTS: All treatment arms improved in the first 2 years, but a progressive and significant deterioration in scores was observed in the MFx group, while both AMIC® groups remained stable. MOCART scores were comparable between groups. CONCLUSION: The AMIC® procedure results in improved patient outcomes in comparison with microfracture up to 10 years following surgery for the repair of focal chondral defects in the knee. CLINICALTRIALS: gov Identifier: NCT02993510.

[Advances in the Treatment of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus]. / è·éª¨éª¨è½¯éª¨æŸä¼¤æ²»ç–—çš„ç ”ç©¶è¿›å±•.

Osteochondral lesion of the talus (OLT) is a localized cartilage and subchondral bone injury of the talus trochlea. OLT is caused by trauma and other reasons, including osteochondritis dissecans of the talus (OCD) and talus osteochondral tangential fracture. OLT can develop from being asymptomatic to subchondral bone cysts accompanied by deep ankle pain. OLT tends to occur on the medial and lateral sides of the talar vault. OLT seriously affects the patients' life and work and may even lead to disability. Herein, we reviewed advances in the treatment of OLT and the strengths and weaknesses of various treatments. Different treatment methods, including conservative treatments and surgical treatments, can be adopted according to the different subtypes or clinical symptoms of OLT. Conservative treatments mostly relieve symptoms in the short term and only slow down the disease. In recent years, it has been discovered that platelet-rich plasma injection, microfracture, periosteal bone grafting, talar cartilage transplantation, allograft bone transplantation, reverse drilling under robotic navigation, and other methods can achieve considerable benefits when each of these treatment methods is applied. Furthermore, microfracture combined with platelet-rich plasma injections, microfracture combined with cartilage transplantation, and various other treatment methods combined with anterior talofibular ligament repair have all led to good treatment outcomes.

Comparison of Arthroscopic Microfracture for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus With and Without Small and Shallow Subchondral Cysts.

BACKGROUND: Whether arthroscopic microfracture is effective in treating cystic osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs) remains controversial. In this study, outcome parameters in patients with small and shallow subchondral cysts are compared to patients without cysts with the hypothesis that equivalent outcomes may be found after primary microfracture treatment. METHODS: From 2018 to 2021, all 50 OLTs treated with arthroscopic microfracture in the authors' hospital were retrospectively reviewed for eligibility. Single unilateral symptomatic lesions were included and divided into the cyst and noncyst groups, whereas kissing lesions and arthritic lesions were excluded. Numeric rating scale (NRS) scores, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scores, Tegner activity level scores, Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) scores, and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging results were used to describe outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 35 patients were included, 16 in the cyst group and 19 in the noncyst group. The patient characteristics were similar between the 2 groups (P > .05). In the cyst group the average cysts depth was 5.0 ± 1.3 mm. After a mean follow-up duration of 36.2 ± 10.2 months, no significant differences were found between the 2 groups in NRS, AOFAS, FAAM, or Tegner score improvement (P > .05). Three patients (19%) in the cyst group had no NRS score improvement. CONCLUSION: OLTs with small and shallow subchondral cysts can be treated with arthroscopic microfracture and achieve similar outcomes as noncystic lesions. A few cystic lesions may not respond to microfracture treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Arthroscopic microfracture and associated techniques in the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus: A systematic review and metanalysis.

BACKGROUND: Osteochondral lesions of the talus are common in patients suffering even minor trauma; timely diagnosis and treatment can prevent the development of early osteoarthritis. The objectives of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to evaluate the effects of additional procedures on arthroscopic ankle microperforations for osteochondral lesions. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed-Medline, Cochrane Central, and Google Scholar to select clinical studies analyzing the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP), hyaluronic acid (HA), and bone marrow concentrate (BMC) procedures. Ten articles following PRISMA guidelines with a total of 464 patients were included in this review. Quality assessment using MINORS was performed, and all studies demonstrated high quality. RESULTS: The results of the systematic review showed benefits in all patients undergoing infiltrative therapy with PRP, hyaluronic acid, and BMC. The best results in terms of AOFAS score and VAS scale were found in patients undergoing PRP injection. The meta-analysis showed improvements in pain relief and return to daily activities in patients undergoing arthroscopic microperforations and PRP, although not reporting statistically significant results (p = 0.42). CONCLUSION: All treatment strategies reported better scores compared to the control groups. Among the various treatments analyzed, the addition of PRP appears to be the most valuable probably for the larger population receiving this treatment, showing excellent outcomes in pain reduction, clinical outcomes, and return to daily activities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Mid-term outcomes of microfracture for the treatment of focal, full-thickness cartilage defects isolated to the humeral head.

BACKGROUND: While microfracture has been shown to be an effective treatment for chondral lesions in the knee, evidence to support its use for chondral defects in the shoulder is limited to short-term outcomes studies. The purpose of this study is to determine if microfracture provides pain relief and improved shoulder function in patients with isolated focal chondral defects of the humeral head at a minimum 5-year follow-up. METHODS: Patients who underwent microfracture procedure for isolated focal chondral defects of the humeral head with a minimum follow-up of 5 years between 02/2006 and 08/2016 were included. At minimum 5-year follow-up, pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures were collected, including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), Short Form-12 (SF-12) Physical Component Summary (PCS), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, and patient satisfaction level (1 = unsatisfied, 10 = very satisfied). Demographic, injury, and surgical data were retrospectively reviewed. Surgical failure was defined as revision surgery for humeral chondral defects or conversion to arthroplasty. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to determine survivorship at 5 years. RESULTS: A total of 17 patients met inclusion/exclusion criteria. There were 15 men and 2 women with an average age of 51 years (range 36-69) and an average follow-up of 9.4 years (range 5.0-15.8). The median ASES score improved from 62 (range: 22-88) preoperatively to 90 (range: 50-100) postoperatively (P = .011). Median satisfaction was 8 out of 10 (range: 2-10). There was no correlation between patient age or defect size and PROs. Postoperatively, patients reported significant improvements in recreational and sporting activity as well as the ability to sleep on the affected shoulder (P ≤ .05). Three patients failed and required revision surgery. The Kaplan-Meier analysis determined an overall survivorship rate of 80% at 5 years. CONCLUSION: The presented study illustrates significant improvements for PROs, improved ability to perform recreational and sporting activities, and a survival rate of 80% at a mean of 9.4 years after microfracture for focal chondral humeral head defects.

Editorial Commentary: Bone Marrow Stimulation or Microfracture May Not Enhance the Success of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.

Bone Marrow Stimulation (BMS) is intended to provide a very low-cost, local source of marrow elements to improve healing and outcomes following rotator cuff repair. However, meta-analysis does not show that this results in improvement in rotator cuff tear outcomes or healing (as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasound). That said, some studies do show lower retear rates with BMS; thus, when faced with challenged biology, this low-cost and low-risk solution may still have merit.

Osteochondral Regeneration in the Knee Joint with Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cells plus Hyaluronic Acid after Arthroscopic Subchondral Drilling: Report of Five Cases.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of osteochondral defects (OCDs) of the knee joint remains challenging. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of osteochondral regeneration following intra-articular injections of autologous peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) plus hyaluronic acid (HA) after arthroscopic subchondral drilling into OCDs of the knee joint. CASE PRESENTATION: Five patients with OCDs of the knee joint are presented. The etiology includes osteochondritis dissecans, traumatic knee injuries, previously failed cartilage repair procedures involving microfractures and OATS (osteochondral allograft transfer systems). PBSC were harvested 1 week after surgery. Patients received intra-articular injections at week 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 after surgery. Then at 6 months after surgery, intra-articular injections were administered at a weekly interval for 3 consecutive weeks. These 3 weekly injections were repeated at 12, 18 and 24 months after surgery. Each patient received a total of 17 injections. Subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores and MRI scans were obtained preoperatively and postoperatively at serial visits. At follow-ups of >5 years, the mean preoperative and postoperative IKDC scores were 47.2 and 80.7 respectively (p = 0.005). IKDC scores for all patients exceeded the minimal clinically important difference values of 8.3, indicating clinical significance. Serial MRI scans charted the repair and regeneration of the OCDs with evidence of bone growth filling-in the base of the defects, followed by reformation of the subchondral bone plate and regeneration of the overlying articular cartilage. CONCLUSION: These case studies showed that this treatment is able to repair and regenerate both the osseous and articular cartilage components of knee OCDs.

Particulated Costal Hyaline Cartilage Allograft With Subchondral Drilling Improves Joint Space Width and Second-Look Macroscopic Articular Cartilage Scores Compared With Subchondral Drilling Alone in Medial Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy.

PURPOSE: To compare the articular cartilage regeneration based on second-look arthroscopy in patients who underwent medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) combined with particulated costal hyaline cartilage allograft (PCHCA) implantation with those who underwent MOWHTO and subchondral drilling (SD). Moreover, we compared the clinical and radiographic outcomes between the groups. METHODS: From January 2014 to November 2020, patients with full-thickness cartilage defect on the medial femoral condyle who underwent MOWHTO combined with PCHCA (group A) or SD (group B) were reviewed. Fifty-one knees were matched after propensity score matching. The status of regenerated cartilage was classified according to the International Cartilage Repair Society-Cartilage Repair Assessment (ICRS-CRA) grading system and Koshino staging system, based on second-look arthroscopic findings. Clinically, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and range of motion were compared. Radiographically, we compared the differences in the minimum joint space width (JSW) and change in JSW. RESULTS: The average age was 55.5 years (range, 42-64 years), and the average follow-up period was 27.1 months (range, 24-48 months). Group A showed a significantly better cartilage status than group B based on the ICRS-CRA grading system and Koshino staging system (P < .001 and <.001, respectively). There were no significant differences in clinical and radiographic outcomes between groups. In group A, the minimum JSW at the last follow-up was significantly increased than that before surgery (P = .013), and a significantly greater increase in JSW was observed in group A (P = .025). CONCLUSIONS: When performed with MOWHTO, the combination of SD and PCHCA was associated with superior articular cartilage regeneration on the ICRS-CRA grading and Koshino staging on second-look arthroscopy performed at a minimum of 2 years follow-up than SD alone. However, there was no difference in clinical outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Clinical Outcomes of Osteochondral Fragment Fixation Versus Microfracture Even for Small Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus.

BACKGROUND: The bone marrow stimulation (BMS) technique is performed for osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs) with a lesion size of <100 mm2. The lesion defect is covered with fibrocartilage, and the clinical outcomes deteriorate over time. In contrast, the osteochondral fragment fixation can restore the native articular surface. The difference in clinical outcomes between these procedures is unclear. PURPOSE: To compare the clinical outcomes of BMS and osteochondral fragment fixation for OLTs and examine the characteristics of patients with poor clinical outcomes of BMS. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: In total, 62 ankles in 59 patients with OLTs were included. BMS was performed for 26 ankles, and fixation was performed for 36 ankles. Clinical outcomes, including the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle Hindfoot Scale and bone marrow edema (BME) as identified on magnetic resonance imaging, were compared between the 2 groups. On computed tomography scans, the lesion location was compared with or without BME in each group. RESULTS: The AOFAS scores in the fixation group (97.3 ± 4.3 points) were significantly higher than those in the BMS group (91.3 ± 7.7 points), even when the lesion size was <100 mm2 (P < .05). When comparing the ankles with or without BME in each group, the AOFAS scores at the final follow-up were significantly lower for the ankles with BME (88.6 ± 7.8 points) than for those without BME (95.0 ± 6.1 points) in the BMS group (P < .05). Lesions with BME in the sagittal plane were located more centrally than those without BME in the BMS group. In the fixation group, there were no significant differences in AOFAS scores and location of the lesion in ankles with or without BME. CONCLUSION: The clinical outcomes of osteochondral fragment fixation are superior to those of BMS in OLTs, even for lesions sized <100 mm2. Fixation is recommended even for small lesions, especially for more centralized lesions in the medial and lateral sides of the talus.

Subchondral Drilling Independent of Drill Hole Number Improves Articular Cartilage Repair and Reduces Subchondral Bone Alterations Compared With Debridement in Adult Sheep.

BACKGROUND: Subchondral drilling is an established marrow stimulation technique for small cartilage defects, but whether drilling is required at all and if the drill hole density affects repair remains unclear. HYPOTHESES: Osteochondral repair is improved when the subchondral bone is perforated by a higher number of drill holes per unit area, and drilling is superior to defect debridement alone. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Rectangular full-thickness chondral defects (4 × 8 mm) were created in the trochlea of adult sheep (N = 16), debrided down to the subchondral bone plate without further treatment as controls (no treatment; n = 7) or treated with either 2 or 6 (n = 7 each) subchondral drill holes (diameter, 1.0 mm; depth, 10.0 mm). Osteochondral repair was assessed at 6 months postoperatively by standardized (semi-)quantitative macroscopic, histological, immunohistochemical, biochemical, and micro-computed tomography analyses. RESULTS: Compared with defect debridement alone, histological overall cartilaginous repair tissue quality (P = .025) and the macroscopic aspect of the adjacent cartilage (P≤ .032) were improved after both drilling densities. Only drilling with 6 holes increased type 2 collagen content in the repair tissue compared with controls (P = .038). After debridement, bone mineral density was significantly decreased in the subchondral bone plate (P≤ .015) and the subarticular spongiosa (P≤ .041) compared with both drilling groups. Debridement also significantly increased intralesional osteophyte sectional area compared with drilling (P≤ .034). No other differences in osteochondral repair existed between subchondral drilling with 6 or 2 drill holes. CONCLUSION: Subchondral drilling independent of drill hole density significantly improves structural cartilage repair compared with sole defect debridement of full-thickness cartilage defects in sheep after 6 months. Subchondral drilling also leads to a better reconstitution of the subchondral bone compartment below the defects. Simultaneously, drilling reduced the formation of intralesional osteophytes caused by osseous overgrowth compared with debridement. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These results have important clinical implications, as they support subchondral drilling independent of drill hole number but discourage debridement alone for the treatment of small cartilage defects. Clinical studies are warranted to further quantify the effects of subchondral drilling in similar settings.