The role of venous capacity in fluid retention with endothelin A antagonism: Mathematical modelling of the RADAR trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Endothelin-1 (ET-1) receptor A (ETA) antagonists reduce proteinuria and prevent renal outcomes in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients, but their utility has been limited because of associated fluid retention, resulting in increased heart failure risk. Understanding the mechanisms responsible for fluid retention could result in solutions that preserve renoprotective effects while mitigating fluid retention, but the complexity of the endothelin system has made identification of the underlying mechanisms challenging. APPROACH: We utilized a previously developed mathematical model of ET-1 kinetics, ETA receptor antagonism, kidney function, haemodynamics, and sodium and water homeostasis to evaluate hypotheses for mechanisms of fluid retention with ETA antagonism. To do this, we simulated the RADAR clinical trial of atrasentan in patients with type 2 diabetes and CKD and evaluated the ability of the model to predict the observed decreases in haematocrit, urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). BACKGROUND AND KEY RESULTS: An effect of ETA antagonism on venodilation and increased venous capacitance was found to be the critical mechanism necessary to reproduce the simultaneous decrease in both MAP and haematocrit observed in RADAR. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPACT: These findings indicate that fluid retention with ETA antagonism may not be caused by a direct antidiuretic effect within the kidney but is instead be an adaptive response to venodilation and increased venous capacity, which acutely tends to reduce cardiac filling pressure and cardiac output, and that fluid retention occurs in an attempt to maintain cardiac filling and cardiac output.

Clinical trial designs to assess treatment effects on glomerular filtration rate decline.

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) decline is used as surrogate endpoint for kidney failure. Interventions that reduce chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression often exert acute GFR reductions which differ from their long-term benefits and complicate the estimation of long-term benefit. Here, we assessed the utility of two alternative trial designs (wash-out design and active run-in randomized withdrawal design) that attempt to exclude the impact of acute effects. Post-hoc analyses of two clinical trials that characterized the effect of an intervention with acute reductions in GFR were conducted. The two trials included a wash-out period (EMPA-REG Outcome testing empagliflozin vs placebo) or an active run-in period with a randomized withdrawal (SONAR testing atrasentan vs placebo). We compared the drug effect on GFR decline calculated from the first on-treatment visit to the end of treatment (chronic slope in a standard randomized trial design) with GFR change calculated from randomization to end of wash out, or GFR change from treatment-specific baseline GFR values (GFR at start-of-run-in for placebo and end-of-run-in for atrasentan) until end-of-treatment. The effect of empagliflozin versus placebo on chronic GFR slope was 1.72 (95% confidence interval 1.49-1.94) mL/min/1.73 m2/year, similar to total GFR decline from baseline to the end of wash-out period using a linear mixed model 1.64 (1.44-1.85) mL/min/1.73 m2/year). The effect of atrasentan versus placebo on chronic GFR slope was 0.72 (0.32-1.11) mL/min/1.73 m2/year, similar to total slope from a single slope model when estimated from treatment specific baseline GFR values 0.77 (0.39-1.14) mL/min/1.73 m2/year). Statistical power of the two designs outperformed the standard randomized design. Thus, wash-out and active-run-in randomized-withdrawal trial designs are appropriate models to compute treatment effects on GFR decline.

Efficacy and Adverse Effects of Atrasentan in Patients with Diabetic Nephropathy: A Meta-Analysis.

Background: About 30% of Type 1 diabetes (T1DM) patients and 40% of Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients were diagnosed with diabetic nephropathy, which has also greatly affected the global end-stage renal disease (ESRD) outcome. Atrasentan is a selective endothelin receptor type A (ETA) antagonist initially studied for the potential treatment of cancer. However, the role of Atrasentan was not sure in the DM. Methods: The machine searches eight databases to find studies examining the impact of Atrasentan in people with diabetic nephropathy both domestically and overseas. Type of Study Design RCTs have been published on Atrasentan's effects in patients with chronic kidney disease.Utilizing RevMan 5.3 software, data analysis was carried out following a thorough assessment of the quality of the literature. Results: This meta-analysis has included 4 papers for statistics. They were all regarded as being random controlled trials. According to 4 studies, the test group's urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR) was significantly lower than the control group's (standardized mean difference (SMD): -222.47; 95% confidence interval (CI): -367.57, -77.38; P < .01), as were the test group's prevalence of cardiovascular disease (OR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.73, 0.95; P < .01) and adverse reactions (OR: 1.00; 95% CI: 1.00). Conclusion: Atrasentan improves the UACR in individuals with chronic kidney disease as compared to the control category. However, these findings need to be confirmed by more high-quality research. Further studies could focus on the effect of the Atrasentan on the diabetic nephropathy management,which will shed light on the treatment of diabetic nephropathy.

Post hoc analysis of the SONAR trial: potential analgesic effects of atrasentan?

Chan et al. conducted a post hoc analysis of the Study of Diabetic Nephropathy with Atrasentan (SONAR) to demonstrate that atrasentan reduced chronic pain-related adverse events reported by investigators and the initiation of analgesics. This study creates an interesting hypothesis, but it is limited in that the pain information was collected as part of the adverse events and the presence/absence of pain at baseline was unknown. Thus, prospective clinical trials are required to confirm these findings.

Post hoc analysis of the SONAR trial indicates that the endothelin receptor antagonist atrasentan is associated with less pain in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease.

Pain is prevalent among patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD). The management of chronic pain in these patients is limited by nephrotoxicity of commonly used drugs including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioids. Since previous studies implicated endothelin-1 in pain nociception, our post hoc analysis of the SONAR trial assessed the association between the endothelin receptor antagonist atrasentan and pain and prescription of analgesics. SONAR was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial that recruited participants with type 2 diabetes and CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate 25-75 ml/min/1.73 m2; urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio 300-5000 mg/g). Participants were randomized to receive atrasentan or placebo (1834 each arm). The main outcome was pain-related adverse events (AEs) reported by investigators. We applied Cox regression to assess the effect of atrasentan compared to placebo on the risk of the first reported pain-related AE and, secondly, first prescription of analgesics. We used the Anderson-Gill method to assess effects on all (first and subsequent) pain-related AEs. During 2.2-year median follow-up, 1183 pain-related AEs occurred. Rates for the first pain-related event were 138.2 and 170.2 per 1000 person-years in the atrasentan and placebo group respectively (hazard ratio 0.82 [95% confidence interval 0.72-0.93]). Atrasentan also reduced the rate of all (first and subsequent) pain-related AEs (rate ratio 0.80 [0.70-0.91]). These findings were similar after accounting for competing risk of death (sub-hazard ratio 0.81 [0.71-0.92]). Patients treated with atrasentan initiated fewer analgesics including NSAIDs and opioids compared to placebo during follow-up (hazard ratio = 0.72 [0.60-0.88]). Thus, atrasentan was associated with reduced pain-related events and pain-related use of analgesics in carefully selected patients with type 2 diabetes and CKD.

Insulin resistance, kidney outcomes and effects of the endothelin receptor antagonist atrasentan in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: Insulin resistance (IR) is a pathophysiologic hallmark of type 2 diabetes and associated with the presence of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Experimental studies suggest that endothelin-1 increases IR. We assessed the association between IR and cardio-renal outcomes and the effect of the selective endothelin receptor antagonist atrasentan on IR in patients with type 2 diabetes and CKD. METHODS: We used data from the RADAR and SONAR trials that recruited participants with type 2 diabetes and CKD [eGFR 25-75 mL/min/1.73 m², urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio of 300-5000 mg/g]. IR was calculated using the homeostatic model assessment (HOMA-IR). The association between HOMA-IR and the pre-specified cardio-renal outcomes was assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, and effects of atrasentan on HOMA-IR by a linear mixed effect model. RESULTS: In the SONAR trial, each log-unit increase in HOMA-IR was associated with an increased risk of the composite cardio-renal outcome [hazard ratio 1.32 (95%CI 1.09,1.60; p = 0.004)], kidney outcome [hazard ratio 1.30 (95%CI 1.00,1.68; p-value = 0.048)], and the kidney or all-cause mortality outcome [hazard ratio 1.25 (95%CI 1.01,1.55; p-value = 0.037)]. After 12 weeks treatment in the RADAR trial (N = 123), atrasentan 0.75 mg/day and 1.25 mg/day compared to placebo reduced HOMA-IR by 19.1 (95%CI -17.4, 44.3) and 26.7% (95%CI -6.4, 49.5), respectively. In the SONAR trial (N = 1914), atrasentan 0.75 mg/day compared to placebo reduced HOMA-IR by 9.6% (95%CI 0.6, 17.9). CONCLUSIONS: More severe IR is associated with increased risk of cardio-renal outcomes. The endothelin receptor antagonist atrasentan reduced IR. TRIAL REGISTRATION: RADAR trial (Reducing Residual Albuminuria in Subjects With Diabetes and Nephropathy With AtRasentan): NCT01356849. SONAR trial (The Study Of Diabetic Nephropathy With AtRasentan) NCT01858532.

Placenta-targeted treatment with nMitoQ prevents an endothelin receptor-A pathway cardiac phenotype observed in adult male offspring exposed to hypoxia in utero.

Prenatal hypoxia is associated with enhanced susceptibility to cardiac ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury in adult offspring, however, the mechanisms remain to be fully investigated. Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is a vasoconstrictor that acts via endothelin A (ETA) and endothelin B (ETB) receptors and is essential in maintaining cardiovascular (CV) function. Prenatal hypoxia alters the ET-1 system in adult offspring possibly contributing to I/R susceptibility. We previously showed that ex vivo application of ETA antagonist ABT-627 during I/R prevented the recovery of cardiac function in prenatal hypoxia-exposed males but not in normoxic males nor normoxic or prenatal hypoxia-exposed females. In this follow-up study, we examined whether placenta-targeted treatment with a nanoparticle-encapsulated mitochondrial antioxidant (nMitoQ) during hypoxic pregnancies could alleviate this hypoxic phenotype observed in adult male offspring. We used a rat model of prenatal hypoxia where pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed to hypoxia (11% O2) from gestational days (GD) 15-21 after injection with 100 µL saline or nMitoQ (125 µM) on GD15. Male offspring were aged to 4 mo and ex vivo cardiac recovery from I/R was assessed. Offspring born from hypoxic pregnancies and treated with nMitoQ had increased cardiac recovery from I/R in the presence of ABT-627 compared with their untreated counterparts where ABT-627 prevented recovery. Cardiac ETA levels were increased in males born from hypoxic pregnancies with nMitoQ treatment compared with saline controls (Western blotting). Our data indicate a profound impact of placenta-targeted treatment to prevent an ETA receptor cardiac phenotype observed in adult male offspring exposed to hypoxia in utero.NEW & NOTEWORTHY In this follow-up study, we showed a complete lack of recovery from I/R injury after the application of an ETA receptor antagonist (ABT-627) in adult male offspring exposed to hypoxia in utero while maternal treatment with nMitoQ during prenatal hypoxia exposure prevented this effect. Our data suggest that nMitoQ treatment during hypoxic pregnancies may prevent a hypoxic cardiac phenotype in adult male offspring.

Endothelin type A receptor blockade attenuates aorto-caval fistula-induced heart failure in rats with angiotensin II-dependent hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the effect of endothelin type A (ET A ) receptor blockade on the course of volume-overload heart failure in rats with angiotensin II-dependent hypertension. METHODS: Ren-2 renin transgenic rats (TGR) were used as a model of hypertension. Heart failure was induced by creating an aorto-caval fistula (ACF). Selective ET A receptor blockade was achieved by atrasentan. For comparison, other rat groups received trandolapril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi). Animals first underwent ACF creation and 2 weeks later the treatment with atrasentan or trandolapril, alone or combined, was applied; the follow-up period was 20 weeks. RESULTS: Eighteen days after creating ACF, untreated TGR began to die, and none was alive by day 79. Both atrasentan and trandolapril treatment improved the survival rate, ultimately to 56% (18 of 31 animals) and 69% (22 of 32 animals), respectively. Combined ACEi and ET A receptor blockade improved the final survival rate to 52% (17 of 33 animals). The effects of the three treatment regimens on the survival rate did not significantly differ. All three treatment regimens suppressed the development of cardiac hypertrophy and lung congestion, decreased left ventricle (LV) end-diastolic volume and LV end-diastolic pressure, and improved LV systolic contractility in ACF TGR as compared with their untreated counterparts. CONCLUSION: The treatment with ET A receptor antagonist delays the onset of decompensation of volume-overload heart failure and improves the survival rate in hypertensive TGR with ACF-induced heart failure. However, the addition of ET A receptor blockade did not enhance the beneficial effects beyond those obtained with standard treatment with ACEi alone.

Endothelin receptor antagonism improves glucose tolerance and adipose tissue inflammation in an experimental model of systemic lupus erythematosus.

Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is elevated in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), an autoimmune disease characterized by high rates of hypertension, renal injury, and cardiovascular disease. SLE is also associated with an increased prevalence of obesity and insulin resistance compared to the general population. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that elevated ET-1 in SLE contributes to obesity and insulin resistance. For these studies, we used the NZBWF1 mouse model of SLE, which develops obesity and insulin resistance on a normal chow diet. To test this hypothesis, we treated control (NZW) and SLE (NZBWF1) mice with vehicle, atrasentan (ETA receptor antagonist, 10 mg/kg/day), or bosentan (ETA/ETB receptor antagonist, 100 mg/kg/day) for 4 wk. Neither treatment impacted circulating immunoglobulin levels, but treatment with bosentan lowered anti-dsDNA IgG levels, a marker of SLE disease activity. Treatment with atrasentan and bosentan decreased glomerulosclerosis, and atrasentan lowered renal T-cell infiltration. Body weight was lower in SLE mice treated with atrasentan or bosentan. Endothelin receptor antagonism also improved hyperinsulinemia, homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance, and glucose tolerance in SLE mice. Adipose tissue inflammation was also improved by endothelin receptor blockade. Taken together, these data suggest a potential therapeutic benefit for SLE patients with obesity and insulin resistance.NEW & NOTEWORTHY SLE is an autoimmune disease that is associated with obesity, insulin resistance, and elevated endothelin-1. The present study demonstrated that pharmacological inhibition of endothelin receptors decreased body weight, insulin resistance, and adipose tissue inflammation in a murine model of SLE. The therapeutic potential of endothelin receptor antagonists to treat obesity-related diseases and pathophysiological conditions, such as autoimmune diseases and insulin resistance, has become increasingly clear.

Enhanced Cardiorenal Protective Effects of Combining SGLT2 Inhibition, Endothelin Receptor Antagonism and RAS Blockade in Type 2 Diabetic Mice.

Treatments with sodium-glucose 2 cotransporter inhibitors (SGLT2i) or endothelin receptor antagonists (ERA) have shown cardiorenal protective effects. The present study aimed to evaluate the cardiorenal beneficial effects of the combination of SGLT2i and ERA on top of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade. Type 2 diabetic mice (db/db) were treated with different combinations of an SGLT2i (empagliflozin), an ERA (atrasentan), and an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ramipril) for 8 weeks. Vehicle-treated diabetic mice and non-diabetic mice were included as controls. Weight, blood glucose, blood pressure, and kidney and heart function were monitored during the study. Kidneys and heart were collected for histological examination and to study the intrarenal RAS. Treatment with empagliflozin alone or combined significantly decreased blood glucose compared to vehicle-treated db/db. The dual and triple therapies achieved significantly greater reductions in diastolic blood pressure than ramipril alone. Compared to vehicle-treated db/db, empagliflozin combined with ramipril or in triple therapy significantly prevented GFR increase, but only the triple combination exerted greater protection against podocyte loss. In the heart, empagliflozin alone or combined reduced cardiac isovolumetric relaxation time (IVRT) and left atrium (LA) diameter as compared to vehicle-treated db/db. However, only the triple therapy was able to reduce cardiomyocyte area. Importantly, the add-on triple therapy further enhanced the intrarenal ACE2/Ang(1-7)/Mas protective arm of the RAS. These data suggest that triple therapy with empagliflozin, atrasentan and ramipril show synergistic cardiorenal protective effects in a type 2 diabetic mouse model.

Organic Anion Transporter Gene Variants Associated With Plasma Exposure and Long-Term Response to Atrasentan in Patients With Diabetic Kidney Disease.

Plasma exposure of the endothelin receptor antagonist atrasentan varies between individuals and is associated with nephroprotective effects and the risk of heart failure. We examined the influence of genetic polymorphisms on atrasentan plasma exposure and pharmacodynamic effects. We performed a substudy of the Study of Diabetic Nephropathy With Atrasentan (SONAR) trial which enrolled adults with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate: 25-75 mL/min/1.73 m2 , and a urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio of 300-5,000 mg/g). Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were determined for prespecified membrane transporters, metabolizing enzymes, and the endothelin-1 peptide. The associations among genotype, atrasentan plasma exposure, and the effect of atrasentan on the prespecified kidney and heart failure hospitalization (HHF) outcomes was assessed with Cox proportional hazards regression models. Of 3,668 patients randomized, 2,329 (63.5%) consented to genotype analysis. Two SNPs in the SLCO1B1 gene (rs4149056 and rs2306283), encoding the hepatic organic anion transporter 1B1 (OATP1B1), showed the strongest association with atrasentan plasma exposure. Based on their SLCO1B1 genotype, patients were classified into normal (atrasentan area under the plasma-concentration time curve from zero to infinity (AUC0-inf ) 41.3 ng·h/mL) or slow (atrasentan AUC0-inf 49.7 ng·h/mL, P < 0.001) OATP1B1 transporter phenotypes. Among patients with a normal OATP1B1 phenotype, the hazard ratio (HR) with atrasentan for the primary kidney and HHF outcomes were 0.61 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.45-0.81) and 1.35 (95% CI: 0.84-2.13), respectively. In the slow transporter phenotype, HRs for kidney and HHF outcomes were 1.95 (95% CI: 0.95-4.03, P-interaction normal phenotype = 0.004), and 4.18 (95% CI: 1.37-12.7, P-interaction normal phenotype = 0.060), respectively. OATP1B1 gene polymorphisms are associated with significant between-patient variability in atrasentan plasma exposure and long-term efficacy and safety.

Increase in BNP in Response to Endothelin-Receptor Antagonist Atrasentan Is Associated With Incident Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: The endothelin receptor antagonist atrasentan reduced the risk of kidney failure in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease (CKD) in the SONAR (Study of Diabetic Nephropathy with Atrasentan) trial, although with a numerically higher incidence of heart failure (HF) hospitalization. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess if early changes in B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and body weight during atrasentan treatment predict HF risk. METHODS: Participants with type 2 diabetes and CKD entered an open-label enrichment phase to assess response to atrasentan 0.75 mg/day. Participants without substantial fluid retention (>3 kg body weight increase or BNP increase to >300 pg/mL), were randomized to atrasentan 0.75 mg/day or placebo. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess the effects of atrasentan vs placebo on the prespecified safety outcome of HF hospitalizations. RESULTS: Among 3,668 patients, 73 (4.0%) participants in the atrasentan and 51 (2.8%) in the placebo group developed HF (HR: 1.39; 95% CI: 0.97-1.99; P = 0.072). In a multivariable analysis, HF risk was associated with higher baseline BNP (HR: 2.32; 95% CI: 1.81-2.97) and percent increase in BNP during response enrichment (HR: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.08-1.98). Body weight change was not associated with HF. Exclusion of patients with at least 25% BNP increase during enrichment attenuated the risk of HF with atrasentan (HR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.66-1.56) while retaining nephroprotective effects (HR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.44-0.78). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with type 2 diabetes and CKD, baseline BNP and early changes in BNP in response to atrasentan were associated with HF hospitalization, highlighting the importance of natriuretic peptide monitoring upon initiation of atrasentan treatment. (Study Of Diabetic Nephropathy With Atrasentan [SONAR]; NCT01858532).

Sex-specific effects of prenatal hypoxia on the cardiac endothelin system in adult offspring.

Fetal hypoxia, a major consequence of complicated pregnancies, impairs offspring cardiac tolerance to ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) insult; however, the mechanisms remain unknown. Endothelin-1 (ET-1) signaling through the endothelin A receptors (ETA) is associated with cardiac dysfunction. We hypothesized that prenatal hypoxia exacerbates cardiac susceptibility to I/R via increased ET-1 and ETA levels, whereas ETA inhibition ameliorates this. Pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed to normoxia (21% O2) or hypoxia (11% O2) on gestational days 15-21. Offspring were aged to 4 mo, and hearts were aerobically perfused or subjected to ex vivo I/R, with or without preinfusion with an ETA antagonist (ABT-627). ET-1 levels were assessed with ELISA in aerobically perfused and post-I/R left ventricles (LV). ETA and ETB levels were assessed by Western blotting in nonperfused LV. As hypothesized, ABT-627 infusion tended to improve post-I/R recovery in hypoxic females (P = 0.0528); however, surprisingly, ABT-627 prevented post-I/R recovery only in the hypoxic males (P < 0.001). ET-1 levels were increased in post-I/R LV in both sexes regardless of the prenatal exposure (P < 0.01). ETA expression was similar among all groups, whereas ETB (isoform C) levels were decreased in prenatally hypoxic females (P < 0.05). In prenatally hypoxic males, ETA signaling may be essential for tolerance to I/R, whereas in prenatally hypoxic females, ETA may contribute to cardiac dysfunction. Our data illustrate that understanding the prenatal history has critical implications for treatment strategies in adult chronic diseases.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We demonstrated that prenatal hypoxia (a common condition of pregnancy) can have profound differential effects on treatment strategies in adult cardiovascular disease. Our data using a rat model of prenatal hypoxia demonstrated that, as adults, although inhibition of endothelin (ETA) receptors before an ex vivo cardiac ischemic insult improved recovery in females, it strikingly prevented recovery in males. Our data indicate a sex-specific effect of prenatal hypoxia on the cardiac ET-1 system in adult offspring.

The Effect of Atrasentan on Kidney and Heart Failure Outcomes by Baseline Albuminuria and Kidney Function: A Post Hoc Analysis of the SONAR Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Atrasentan reduces the risk of kidney failure but increases the risk of edema and, possibly, heart failure. Patients with severe CKD may obtain greater absolute kidney benefits from atrasentan but may also be at higher risk of heart failure. We assessed relative and absolute effects of atrasentan on kidney and heart failure events according to baseline eGFR and urinary albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR) in a post hoc analysis of the Study of Diabetic Nephropathy with Atrasentan (SONAR) trial. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: The effect of atrasentan versus placebo in 3668 patients with type 2 diabetes and CKD with elevated albuminuria was examined in the SONAR trial. We used Cox proportional hazards regression analysis to study effects on the primary kidney outcome (composite of doubling of serum creatinine, kidney failure, or kidney death) and heart failure hospitalization across subgroups of eGFR (<30, ≥30-45, and ≥45 ml/min per 1.73 m2) and UACR (<1000, ≥1000-3000, and ≥3000 mg/g). RESULTS: Atrasentan reduced the relative risk of the primary kidney outcome (hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.58 to 0.88) consistently across all subgroups of baseline eGFR and UACR (all P interaction >0.21). Patients in the highest UACR and lowest eGFR subgroups, in whom rates of the primary kidney outcome were highest, showed the largest absolute benefit (all P interaction <0.01). The risk of heart failure hospitalization was higher in the atrasentan group (hazard ratio, 1.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.97 to 1.99) and was consistent across subgroups, with no evidence that relative or absolute risks differed across eGFR or UACR subgroups (all P interaction >0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Atrasentan reduced the relative risk of the primary kidney outcome consistently across baseline UACR and eGFR subgroups. The absolute risk reduction was greater among patients in the lowest eGFR and highest albuminuria category who were at highest baseline risk. Conversely, the relative and absolute risks of heart failure hospitalization were similar across baseline UACR and eGFR subgroups.Clinical Trial registry name and registration number: Study of Diabetic Nephropathy with Atrasentan (SONAR), NCT01858532.

Early Response in Albuminuria and Long-Term Kidney Protection during Treatment with an Endothelin Receptor Antagonist: A Prespecified Analysis from the SONAR Trial.

BACKGROUND: Whether early reduction in albuminuria with atrasentan treatment predicts its long-term kidney-protective effect is unknown. METHODS: To assess the long-term effects on kidney outcomes of atrasentan versus placebo in the SONAR trial, we enrolled patients who had type 2 diabetes and CKD (stage 2-4) and a urinary albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) of 300-5000 mg/g; participants were receiving maximum tolerated renin-angiotensin system inhibition. After 6 weeks exposure to 0.75 mg/day atrasentan (enrichment period), participants were randomized (stratified by UACR response during enrichment, ranging from ≤60% to >0%) to continue atrasentan or transition to placebo. Primary kidney outcome was a composite of sustained serum creatinine doubling or ESKD. RESULTS: UACR response to atrasentan during enrichment persisted throughout the double-blind treatment phase and predicted the primary kidney outcome, whereas UACR levels with placebo remained below pre-enrichment values in the two highest UACR response strata, and exceeded pre-enrichment values in the two lowest strata. As a result, early UACR response to atrasentan during enrichment was also associated with the primary kidney outcome during placebo. Accordingly, the predictive effect of early albuminuria changes during atrasentan was eliminated after placebo correction, leading to a consistent relative risk reduction for the primary kidney outcome with atrasentan compared with placebo, irrespective of the initial UACR response. The difference between atrasentan and placebo in UACR during double-blind treatment was also consistent across UACR response strata. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings do not support UACR response as a causal predictor of atrasentan's treatment effect. However, the variable trajectory in UACR with placebo, aspects of the trial design, day-to-day variability in albuminuria, and potential long-lasting effects of atrasentan may have contributed.

Modulation by antenatal therapies of cardiovascular and renal programming in male and female offspring of preeclamptic rats.

Morbidity and mortality risks are enhanced in preeclamptic (PE) mothers and their offspring. Here, we asked if sexual dimorphism exists in (i) cardiovascular and renal damage evolved in offspring of PE mothers, and (ii) offspring responsiveness to antenatal therapies. PE was induced by administering NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME, 50 mg/kg/day, oral gavage) to pregnant rats for 7 days starting from gestational day 14. Three therapies were co-administered orally with L-NAME, atrasentan (endothelin ETA receptor antagonist), terutroban (thromboxane A2 receptor antagonist, TXA2), or α-methyldopa (α-MD, central sympatholytic drug). Cardiovascular and renal profiles were assessed in 3-month-old offspring. Compared with offspring of non-PE rats, PE offspring exhibited elevated systolic blood pressure and proteinuria and reduced heart rate and creatinine clearance (CrCl). Apart from a greater bradycardia in male offspring, similar PE effects were noted in male and female offspring. While terutroban, atrasentan, or α-MD partially and similarly blunted the PE-evoked changes in CrCl and proteinuria, terutroban was the only drug that virtually abolished PE hypertension. Rises in cardiorenal inflammatory (tumor necrosis factor alpha, TNFα) and oxidative (isoprostane) markers were mostly and equally eliminated by all therapies in the two sexes, except for a greater dampening action of atrasentan, compared with α-MD, on tissue TNFα in female offspring only. Histopathologically, antenatal terutroban or atrasentan was more effective than α-MD in rectifying cardiac structural damage, myofiber separation, and cytoplasmic alterations, in PE offspring. The repair by antenatal terutroban or atrasentan of cardiovascular and renal anomalies in PE offspring is mostly sex-independent and surpasses the protection offered by α-MD, the conventional PE therapy.

Effects of systemic and renal intramedullary endothelin-1 receptor blockade on tissue NO and intrarenal hemodynamics in normotensive and hypertensive rats.

Endothelin 1 (ET-1) seems essential in salt-dependent hypertension, and activation of ETA receptors causes renal vasoconstriction. However, the response in the renal medulla and the role of tissue NO availability has never been adequately explored in vivo. We examined effects of ETA and ETB receptor blockade (atrasentan and BQ788) on blood pressure (MAP), medullary blood flow (MBF) and medullary tissue NO. Effects of systemic and intramedullary blocker application were compared in anesthetized normotensive ET-1-pretreated Sprague-Dawley rats (S-D), in salt-dependent hypertension (HS/UNX) and in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). Total renal blood flow (RBF) was measured using a Transonic renal artery probe, MBF as laser-Doppler flux, and tissue NO signal using selective electrodes. In normotensive rats ET-1 significantly increased MAP, decreased RBF (-20%) and renal medullary NO. In HS/UNX rats atrasentan decreased MAP and increased medullary NO, earlier and more profoundly with intravenous infusion. In SHR atrasentan decreased MAP, more effectively with intravenous infusion; the increase in tissue NO (∼10%) was similar with both routes; however, only intramedullary atrasentan increased MBF. No consistent responses to BQ788 were seen. We confirmed dominant role of ETA receptors in regulation of blood pressure and renal hemodynamics in normotensive and hypertensive rats and provided novel evidence for the role of ETA in control of intrarenal NO bioavailability in salt-dependent and spontaneous hypertension. Under conditions of activation of the endothelin system ETB stimulation preserved medullary perfusion.