Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 650
Filter
1.
Epileptic Disord ; 26(5): 567-580, 2024 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39141394

ABSTRACT

To present the background, rationale, details pertaining to use and essential computational steps, synopsis of findings to date, and future directions for the International Classification of Cognitive Disorders in Epilepsy (IC-CoDE)-an initiative of the ILAE Neuropsychology Task Force. Examined are: (a) the 6 steps leading to the derivation of a cognitive phenotype from neuropsychological test data with an accompanying case example, (b) concise review of all IC-CoDE research to date, (c) summary of identified correlates of IC-CoDE outcomes, and (d) future research and clinical directions for the initiative. The IC-CoDE is computationally uncomplicated with individual or group data and represents a novel approach leading to new insights in the neuropsychology of epilepsy, with applications to diverse datasets internationally informing the reliability and validity of the approach. The IC-CoDE represents a novel approach to the analysis and interpretation of neuropsychological data in epilepsy that offers to advance a global taxonomy of cognitive disorders in epilepsy facilitating international collaboration and big data science.


Subject(s)
Epilepsy , Humans , Epilepsy/diagnosis , Epilepsy/classification , Epilepsy/physiopathology , International Classification of Diseases/standards , Cognition Disorders/diagnosis , Cognition Disorders/classification , Neuropsychological Tests/standards
2.
Clin Interv Aging ; 16: 311-323, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33654388

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Studies concerning the impact of the AT(N) framework on diagnostic capability in the dementia population are lacking. We aimed to explore the diagnostic application of CSF AT(N) framework in clinical routines of Alzheimer's disease (AD) as well as differential diagnosis of other cognitive diseases in the Chinese Han population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 137 patients with cognitive disorders received CSF tests of Aß42, t-tau and p-tau181. Their CSF biomarker results were categorized and interpreted by the AT(N) framework. Neurologists provided a diagnosis both pre- and post-CSF biomarker disclosure with corresponding diagnostic confidence. RESULTS: The total initial diagnosis included 79 patients with AD and 58 patients with non-AD (NAD). The results of CSF biomarkers led to a diagnostic change of 28% in the cohort. Approximately 81.5% (n=53) of 65 patients whose CSF biomarker showed an underlying AD pathology were finally diagnosed as AD, with an increase of 17.5% in diagnostic confidence. Thirty-seven CSF results indicating NAD pathologic changes contributed to an exclusion of AD in 56.8% (n=21) of the patients along with a modest increase of 9.8% in average confidence. Thirty-five patients with normal CSF biomarkers maintained the diagnosis of NAD in 68.6% (n=24) of the group, leading to a slight elevation of 7.6% in confidence. CONCLUSION: We found that the presence of amyloid pathology (A+) is contributable to diagnosing AD and improving confidence. On occasion of negative amyloid pathology (A-), with or without tau pathology, gaining uncertainty of the primary AD diagnosis would diminish the corresponding confidence. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study performed in the Chinese Han population with cognitive disorders that explores the clinical capability of CSF AT(N) framework in a quantitative way.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , Amyloid beta-Peptides/cerebrospinal fluid , Cognition Disorders , tau Proteins/cerebrospinal fluid , Aged , Alzheimer Disease/cerebrospinal fluid , Alzheimer Disease/diagnosis , Alzheimer Disease/psychology , Biomarkers/cerebrospinal fluid , China/epidemiology , Cognition Disorders/cerebrospinal fluid , Cognition Disorders/classification , Cognition Disorders/diagnosis , Cohort Studies , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Male
3.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33609605

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Limited extant research on neurocognitive endophenotypes in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) show inconsistent results. Limitations of this body of literature include small sample sizes, strict exclusion criteria, lack of objective standard normalized test scores, and significant lack of studies utilizing pediatric probands. This study aimed to address these limitations. METHODS: A large carefully screened cohort of pediatric OCD (n = 102), their unaffected siblings (n = 78), and parents (n = 164), completed a neuropsychological battery. To compare participants at different ages and developmental stages, standard scores were computed using test norms. Cluster-robust regression with sample size-adjusted sandwich estimates of variance, and interclass correlations were computed. False Discovery Rate procedures were employed to correct for multiplicity. RESULTS: Probands, siblings and parents demonstrated deficient task performance (Z < -0.5) on the 'number of trials to complete first category' on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, and on the Stroop color naming trials. Compared to test norms, the three groups exhibited medium to large effect sizes on these outcome measures. No other meaningful familial trends were found. CONCLUSIONS: OCD probands, their unaffected siblings and parents exhibited deficiencies in specific subdomains of cognitive flexibility and inhibitory control, namely, initial concept formation and proactive control, which may be valid candidate neurocognitive endophenotypes of OCD. No other meaningful familial effect has been found on other functions, including other executive function indices such as perseverations and interference control. These results highlight the need to carefully examine individual outcomes from executive function tests instead of the tendency to focus largely on major outcome measures.


Subject(s)
Cognition Disorders , Endophenotypes , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/genetics , Parents , Siblings , Adult , Child , Cognition Disorders/classification , Cognition Disorders/genetics , Female , Humans , Male , Neuropsychological Tests/statistics & numerical data , Parents/psychology , Siblings/psychology , Stroop Test/statistics & numerical data
4.
Neuropsychology ; 34(6): 726-734, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32324004

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is commonly associated with neurocognitive dysfunction. However, there remains substantial heterogeneity between patients and inconsistent findings regarding the magnitude and prevalence of specific neurocognitive deficits. This study aimed to investigate the potential for different neurocognitive subgroups in patients diagnosed with MDD. METHOD: Data were pooled from 4 different clinical trials that involved adults diagnosed with MDD. Neurocognitive outcomes included measures of verbal learning and memory, executive function, attention, and processing speed. Latent class analysis was conducted to examine for different subgroups based on neurocognitive profiles of performance across outcome measures. Subgroups were compared to a separate sample of age-matched adult healthy controls, across illness factors, and individual mood items on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). RESULTS: Within the MDD cohort (N = 149), 45% of participants were considered relatively "cognitively preserved," with the remainder "cognitively reduced" (39%) or "cognitively impaired" (16%). Verbal memory performance was significantly poorer compared to attention and processing speed only in the "cognitively impaired" subgroup. There was no association between subgroup membership and relevant illness factors, including ratings on individual MADRS items. LIMITATIONS: Data were pooled from several studies that included different neurocognitive measures and cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately half of MDD participants had no or minimal objective cognitive difficulties, and neurocognitive functioning was found generally unrelated to illness factors. Future longitudinal research is warranted to determine whether the people who are relatively cognitively impaired are at increased risk for further cognitive decline. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).


Subject(s)
Cognition Disorders/classification , Cognition Disorders/psychology , Depressive Disorder, Major/classification , Depressive Disorder, Major/psychology , Adult , Aged , Attention , Cognition Disorders/etiology , Depressive Disorder, Major/complications , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Double-Blind Method , Executive Function , Female , Humans , Male , Memory , Middle Aged , Neuropsychological Tests , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Reaction Time , Verbal Learning
5.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol ; 41(8): 775-785, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31156042

ABSTRACT

Prognostic modeling in moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) has historically focused primarily on the projection of crude outcomes such as the risk of mortality and disability. Initial work in this area has perpetuated the notion that prognosis after moderate to severe TBI can be measured as a single, static, and dichotomous outcome. However, more recent conceptualizations describe moderate to severe TBI as the initiation of a chronic disease state with high levels of inter-individual variability in terms of symptom manifestation and disease progression. Unfortunately, existing prognostic models provide limited insight into the extent of chronic cognitive and neurodegenerative changes experienced by moderate to severe TBI survivors. Though prior research has identified a variety of acute factors that appear to influence post-injury cognitive and neuropathological outcomes, an empirically supported framework for prognostic modeling of these injury-distal outcomes does not exist. The current review considers the literature on an expanded array of empirically supported predictors (both premorbid and injury-related) in association with long-term sequelae of moderate to severe TBI. We also provide a theoretical framework and statistical approach for prognostic modeling in moderate to severe TBI in order to unify efforts across research groups and facilitate important progress in this research area.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries, Traumatic/diagnosis , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/pathology , Brain Injury, Chronic/diagnosis , Brain Injury, Chronic/pathology , Cognition Disorders/diagnosis , Cognition Disorders/pathology , Brain/pathology , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/classification , Brain Injury, Chronic/classification , Cognition Disorders/classification , Disability Evaluation , Educational Status , Executive Function , Female , Glasgow Outcome Scale , Humans , Learning Disabilities/classification , Learning Disabilities/diagnosis , Learning Disabilities/pathology , Male , Memory Disorders/classification , Memory Disorders/diagnosis , Memory Disorders/pathology , Neurodegenerative Diseases/classification , Neurodegenerative Diseases/diagnosis , Neurodegenerative Diseases/pathology , Neuropsychological Tests , Organ Size/physiology , Prognosis , Risk Factors
6.
Schizophr Res ; 208: 344-352, 2019 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30711315

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with psychotic spectrum disorders share overlapping clinical/biological features, making it often difficult to separate them into a discrete nosology (i.e., Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders [DSM]). METHODS: The current study investigated whether a continuum classification scheme based on symptom burden would improve conceptualizations for cognitive and real-world dysfunction relative to traditional DSM nosology. Two independent samples (New Mexico [NM] and Bipolar and Schizophrenia Network on Intermediate Phenotypes [B-SNIP]) of patients with schizophrenia (NM: N = 93; B-SNIP: N = 236), bipolar disorder Type I (NM: N = 42; B-SNIP: N = 195) or schizoaffective disorder (NM: N = 15; B-SNIP: N = 148) and matched healthy controls (NM: N = 64; B-SNIP: N = 717) were examined. Linear regressions examined how variance differed as a function of classification scheme (DSM diagnosis, negative and positive symptom burden, or a three-cluster solution based on symptom burden). RESULTS: Symptom-based classification schemes (continuous and clustered) accounted for a significantly larger portion of captured variance of real-world functioning relative to DSM diagnoses across both samples. The symptom-based classification schemes accounted for large percentages of variance for general cognitive ability and cognitive domains in the NM sample. However, in the B-SNIP sample, symptom-based classification schemes accounted for roughly equivalent variance as DSM diagnoses. A potential mediating variable across samples was the strength of the relationship between negative symptoms and impaired cognition. CONCLUSIONS: Current results support suggestions that a continuum perspective of psychopathology may be more powerful for explaining real-world functioning than the DSM diagnostic nosology, whereas results for cognitive dysfunction were sample dependent.


Subject(s)
Cognition Disorders/psychology , Emotional Intelligence , Psychotic Disorders/psychology , Symptom Assessment/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Bipolar Disorder/classification , Bipolar Disorder/diagnosis , Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Cognition Disorders/classification , Cognition Disorders/diagnosis , Cost of Illness , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Emotional Intelligence/classification , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neuropsychological Tests , Phenotype , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Psychotic Disorders/classification , Psychotic Disorders/diagnosis , Symptom Assessment/classification , Young Adult
7.
Aging Clin Exp Res ; 31(1): 41-47, 2019 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29949026

ABSTRACT

AIM: To investigate the relationship between onset of delirium and time to surgery in hip fracture (HF) patients with a different degree of cognitive impairment. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a prospective database of 939 older adults, aged ≥ 75 years admitted with a fragility HF. Subjects underwent a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment on admission, evaluating health status, prefracture functional status in basic and instrumental activities of daily living, and walking ability. According to the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire score, patients were stratified into three categories: cognitively healthy (0-2 errors), mildly to moderately impaired (3-7 errors) and severely impaired (8-10 errors). Time to surgery (from admission) was expressed as days. The occurrence of delirium was ascertained daily by Confusion Assessment Method. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-two (31.1%) patients experienced delirium during in-hospital stay. They were older, with a higher degree of comorbidity and functional impairment compared to patients without delirium. In multivariate analysis, surgical delay resulted a significant independent risk factor for delirium (HR 1.11, 95% CI 1.01-1.24), along with age, prefracture functional disability and cognitive impairment. When the analysis was performed accounting for the cognitive categories, surgical delay demonstrated to increase the risk of delirium only in the subcategory of mildly to moderately impaired patients, while no significant effect was demonstrated in patients cognitively healthy or severely impaired. CONCLUSIONS: The study supports the concept that older adults with HF should undergo surgery quickly. Patients with mild-to-moderate cognitive impairment should be primarily considered as the best target for interventions aiming to reduce time to surgery.


Subject(s)
Cognition Disorders/complications , Delirium/etiology , Hip Fractures/complications , Time-to-Treatment , Activities of Daily Living , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Case-Control Studies , Cognition Disorders/classification , Cognitive Dysfunction/complications , Delirium/epidemiology , Female , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Hip Fractures/surgery , Humans , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
8.
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi ; 57(12): 894-900, 2018 Dec 01.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30486557

ABSTRACT

There are no standard diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer's disease (AD) in China. The copied international criteria has led to a high rate of missed diagnosis due to issues such as translation and cultural discrepancy. Under the principles of semantic equivalence, content equivalence and performance equivalence, the research group of Alzheimer's Disease Chinese (ADC) adopted several effective methods, such as two-way translation, content conversion, performance evaluation, etc. to systematically study the cognitive, behavioral, functional, and general assessment techniques in dementia screening and diagnosis, as well as their screening thresholds and diagnostic values. We also established a dementia screening and assessment framework in clinical practice through systematic reviews and group consensus. It has improved the early diagnosis rate of dementia in China, been accepted by home and abroad academic institutions, which is of great significance for early diagnosis and treatment of dementia.


Subject(s)
Asian People , Cognition Disorders/diagnosis , Dementia/diagnosis , Mass Screening/methods , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Aged , China , Cognition Disorders/classification , Dementia/ethnology , Early Diagnosis , Humans
9.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 62(10): 1473-1480, 2018 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30325016

ABSTRACT

Cognitive change affecting patients after anaesthesia and surgery has been recognised for more than 100 yr. Research into cognitive change after anaesthesia and surgery accelerated in the 1980s when multiple studies utilised detailed neuropsychological testing for assessment of cognitive change after cardiac surgery. This body of work consistently documented decline in cognitive function in elderly patients after anaesthesia and surgery, and cognitive changes have been identified up to 7.5 yr afterwards. Importantly, other studies have identified that the incidence of cognitive change is similar after non-cardiac surgery. Other than the inclusion of non-surgical control groups to calculate postoperative cognitive dysfunction, research into these cognitive changes in the perioperative period has been undertaken in isolation from cognitive studies in the general population. The aim of this work is to develop similar terminology to that used in cognitive classifications of the general population for use in investigations of cognitive changes after anaesthesia and surgery. A multispecialty working group followed a modified Delphi procedure with no prespecified number of rounds comprised of three face-to-face meetings followed by online editing of draft versions. Two major classification guidelines [Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders, fifth edition (DSM-5) and National Institute for Aging and the Alzheimer Association (NIA-AA)] are used outside of anaesthesia and surgery, and may be useful for inclusion of biomarkers in research. For clinical purposes, it is recommended to use the DSM-5 nomenclature. The working group recommends that 'perioperative neurocognitive disorders' be used as an overarching term for cognitive impairment identified in the preoperative or postoperative period. This includes cognitive decline diagnosed before operation (described as neurocognitive disorder); any form of acute event (postoperative delirium) and cognitive decline diagnosed up to 30 days after the procedure (delayed neurocognitive recovery) and up to 12 months (postoperative neurocognitive disorder).


Subject(s)
Anesthesia/adverse effects , Cognition Disorders/classification , Surgical Procedures, Operative/adverse effects , Activities of Daily Living , Cognition Disorders/epidemiology , Cognition Disorders/etiology , Delirium/classification , Delirium/epidemiology , Delphi Technique , Humans , Postoperative Complications/classification , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Terminology as Topic
10.
Anesth Analg ; 127(5): 1189-1195, 2018 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30325748

ABSTRACT

Cognitive change affecting patients after anaesthesia and surgery has been recognised for more than 100 yr. Research into cognitive change after anaesthesia and surgery accelerated in the 1980s when multiple studies utilised detailed neuropsychological testing for assessment of cognitive change after cardiac surgery. This body of work consistently documented decline in cognitive function in elderly patients after anaesthesia and surgery, and cognitive changes have been identified up to 7.5 yr afterwards. Importantly, other studies have identified that the incidence of cognitive change is similar after non-cardiac surgery. Other than the inclusion of non-surgical control groups to calculate postoperative cognitive dysfunction, research into these cognitive changes in the perioperative period has been undertaken in isolation from cognitive studies in the general population. The aim of this work is to develop similar terminology to that used in cognitive classifications of the general population for use in investigations of cognitive changes after anaesthesia and surgery. A multispecialty working group followed a modified Delphi procedure with no prespecified number of rounds comprised of three face-to-face meetings followed by online editing of draft versions.Two major classification guidelines [Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders, fifth edition (DSM-5) and National Institute for Aging and the Alzheimer Association (NIA-AA)] are used outside of anaesthesia and surgery, and may be useful for inclusion of biomarkers in research. For clinical purposes, it is recommended to use the DSM-5 nomenclature. The working group recommends that 'perioperative neurocognitive disorders' be used as an overarching term for cognitive impairment identified in the preoperative or postoperative period. This includes cognitive decline diagnosed before operation (described as neurocognitive disorder); any form of acute event (postoperative delirium) and cognitive decline diagnosed up to 30 days after the procedure (delayed neurocognitive recovery) and up to 12 months (postoperative neurocognitive disorder).


Subject(s)
Anesthesia/adverse effects , Cognition Disorders/classification , Cognition , Delirium/classification , Surgical Procedures, Operative/adverse effects , Terminology as Topic , Cognition Disorders/diagnosis , Cognition Disorders/epidemiology , Cognition Disorders/psychology , Consensus , Delirium/diagnosis , Delirium/epidemiology , Delirium/psychology , Delphi Technique , Humans , Incidence , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
11.
J Alzheimers Dis ; 66(1): 1-10, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30347621

ABSTRACT

Cognitive change affecting patients after anaesthesia and surgery has been recognised for more than 100 yr. Research into cognitive change after anaesthesia and surgery accelerated in the 1980s when multiple studies utilised detailed neuropsychological testing for assessment of cognitive change after cardiac surgery. This body of work consistently documented decline in cognitive function in elderly patients after anaesthesia and surgery, and cognitive changes have been identified up to 7.5 yr afterwards. Importantly, other studies have identified that the incidence of cognitive change is similar after non-cardiac surgery. Other than the inclusion of non-surgical control groups to calculate postoperative cognitive dysfunction, research into these cognitive changes in the perioperative period has been undertaken in isolation from cognitive studies in the general population. The aim of this work is to develop similar terminology to that used in cognitive classifications of the general population for use in investigations of cognitive changes after anaesthesia and surgery. A multispecialty working group followed a modified Delphi procedure with no prespecified number of rounds comprised of three face-to-face meetings followed by online editing of draft versions.Two major classification guidelines [Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders, fifth edition (DSM-5) and National Institute for Aging and the Alzheimer Association (NIA-AA)] are used outside of anaesthesia and surgery, and may be useful for inclusion of biomarkers in research. For clinical purposes, it is recommended to use the DSM-5 nomenclature. The working group recommends that 'perioperative neurocognitive disorders' be used as an overarching term for cognitive impairment identified in the preoperative or postoperative period. This includes cognitive decline diagnosed before operation (described as neurocognitive disorder); any form of acute event (postoperative delirium) and cognitive decline diagnosed up to 30 days after the procedure (delayed neurocognitive recovery) and up to 12 months (postoperative neurocognitive disorder).


Subject(s)
Anesthesia/adverse effects , Cognition Disorders/classification , Cognition/physiology , Postoperative Complications/classification , Terminology as Topic , Cognition Disorders/diagnosis , Cognition Disorders/etiology , Humans , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Time Factors
12.
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi ; 34(1): 44-48, 2018 Feb.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29577704

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To explore the application of activities of daily living (ADL) scale in mild psychiatric impairment assessment under the guideline of Classification of Human Body Disability Caused by Injury. METHODS: A total of 124 subjects with organic mental disorders and mild psychiatric impairments (levels 7 to 10), and 106 healthy controls were included in. All participants were assessed by the ADL scale, physical self-maintenance scale (PSMS) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) scale. The difference between the scores of control group and study group, and the relationship of impairment level and the scores were compared, and the threshold value was determined according to the ROC curve. RESULTS: The total scores of ADL, IADL and PSMS were significantly different between the control group and the study group (P<0.05). The scores of ADL, IADL, PSMS were significantly different among the impairment levels (P<0.05), which showed a relativity with impairment level. The scores of ADL corresponding to levels 10, 9, 8 and 7 were 14-17, 18-23, 24-29 and 30-34, respectively, which showed a good correlation between the conclusion according to the scale and the expert's opinion (κ= 0.914, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The score of ADL was significantly related to mild psychiatric impairment, and the higher ADL score represents the more severe disability, which can be used as a reference index for preliminarily judging the level of mild psychiatric impairment.


Subject(s)
Activities of Daily Living/psychology , Cognition Disorders/classification , Disabled Persons/psychology , Mental Disorders/classification , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Case-Control Studies , Cognition Disorders/etiology , Cognition Disorders/psychology , Humans , Mental Disorders/etiology , Mental Disorders/psychology , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
13.
Nervenarzt ; 89(3): 263-270, 2018 Mar.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29383413

ABSTRACT

Many individual studies and meta-analyses have shown that psychotherapeutic interventions for people with bipolar disorders can positively influence the course of the disease. This article gives an overview of the development of psychotherapy for people with bipolar disorders. According to the current guidelines the evidence-based procedures with their mechanisms of action are presented and new developments in psychotherapy research in this field are outlined.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder/therapy , Psychotherapy/methods , Bipolar Disorder/classification , Bipolar Disorder/diagnosis , Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Cognition Disorders/classification , Cognition Disorders/diagnosis , Cognition Disorders/psychology , Cognition Disorders/therapy , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods , Combined Modality Therapy , Comorbidity , Evidence-Based Medicine , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Prognosis , Psychotherapy, Group/methods , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Risk Factors , Self Care
14.
Int Psychogeriatr ; 30(2): 221-232, 2018 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28931446

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A dearth of population-based epidemiological research examines neuropsychiatric symptom (NPS) in sub-clinical populations across the spectrum from normal aging to mild cognitive impairment (MCI). The construct of mild behavioral impairment (MBI) describes the emergence of sustained and impactful NPS in advance of or in combination with MCI. This is the first epidemiological study to operationalize the recently published diagnostic criteria for MBI and determine prevalence estimates across the spectrum from cognitively normal to MCI. METHODS: MBI was assessed in 1,377 older (age range 72-79 years; 52% male; MCI ;= 133; cognitively normal, but-at-risk = 397; cognitively healthy = 847). MBI was assessed in accordance with the ISTAART-AA diagnostic criteria for MBI using the neuropsychiatric inventory. RESULTS: 34.1% of participants met the criteria for MBI. High prevalence of MBI across the cognitive spectrum was reported (48.9% vs. 43.1% vs. 27.6%). Irrespective of level of cognitive impairment, impulse dyscontrol (33.8% vs. 28.7% vs. 17.2%) and decreased motivation (32.3% vs. 26.2% vs. 16.3%) were the most frequently met MBI domains. MBI was more prevalent in men (χ2 = 4.98, p = 0.026), especially the domains of decreased motivation and impulse dyscontrol. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents the first population-based prevalence estimates for MBI using the recently published ISTAART-AA diagnostic criteria. Findings indicate relatively high prevalence of MBI in pre-dementia clinical states and amongst cognitively healthy older adults. Findings were gender-specific, with MBI affecting more men than women. Knowing the estimates of these symptoms in the population is essential for understanding and differentiating the very early development of clinical disorders.


Subject(s)
Behavioral Symptoms/epidemiology , Cognition Disorders/epidemiology , Cognitive Dysfunction/epidemiology , Dementia/epidemiology , Neuropsychological Tests , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cognition Disorders/classification , Cognition Disorders/psychology , Cognitive Dysfunction/diagnosis , Cognitive Dysfunction/psychology , Dementia/classification , Dementia/diagnosis , Dementia/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence
15.
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci ; 30(1): 22-30, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28774225

ABSTRACT

Changes in health care and disease epidemiology have shifted the attention of neuropsychologists and cognitive neuroscientists from vascular lesions to degenerative diseases or other bilateral brain lesions. This displacement of attention from vascular patients to patients with degenerative brain diseases allowed the discovery of hitherto unexplored and unheralded aspects of the neural substrates of human cognition. Three aspects of research on the anterior parts of the temporal lobes (ATLs) are the focus of the present review. The first aspect is category-specific semantic disorders, including current accounts of categorical brain organization, the anatomical substrate of different categories (stressing the role of the ATLs with respect to the biological categories), and the "sources of knowledge" that contribute to construction of those categories. The second aspect is the role of the ATLs in conceptual knowledge, including the "hub-and-spokes" model of semantic representation and semantic control. The third aspect is the role of the right ATL in recognition of familiar people, including the distinction made between associative prosopagnosia and multimodal disorders of person recognition. Consistencies and inconsistencies of results obtained across these different domains are discussed, and the clinical implications of these findings are considered.


Subject(s)
Cognition Disorders/etiology , Neurodegenerative Diseases , Neuropsychological Tests , Prosopagnosia/etiology , Temporal Lobe/pathology , Animals , Cognition Disorders/classification , Cognition Disorders/diagnosis , Functional Laterality , Humans , Neurodegenerative Diseases/complications , Neurodegenerative Diseases/epidemiology , Neurodegenerative Diseases/pathology , Recognition, Psychology , Semantics
16.
Eur J Neurol ; 25(1): 185-191, 2018 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29058792

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The association between oxidized low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL) and cognitive impairment is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the potential association between oxLDL and cognitive impairment among patients with acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: We measured the levels of oxLDL and recorded the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score in patients with acute ischemic stroke who were recruited from the Study of Oxidative Stress in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke. Cognitive impairment was defined as an MMSE score of <24. The association between oxLDL and cognitive impairment was assessed by multivariate logistic or linear regression analysis. Other clinical variables of interest were also studied. RESULTS: A total of 3726 patients [1287 (34.54%) female] were included in this study, with a mean age of 63.62 ± 11.96 years. After adjusting for potential confounders in our logistic regression model, each SD increase in oxLDL was associated with a 26% increase in the prevalence of cognitive impairment (odds radio, 1.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-1.39; P < 0.0001). Similarly, higher oxLDL was associated with lower MMSE scores, with a 0.56-point decrease in MMSE score for every SD increase in oxLDL in a linear regression analysis (ß = -0.56; 95% confidence interval, -0.81 to -0.32; P < 0.0001). There were no significant interactions between oxLDL and age, sex or education levels for cognitive impairment (all interactions, P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Elevated levels of oxLDL were associated with a higher prevalence of cognitive impairment in patients with ischemic stroke.


Subject(s)
Brain Ischemia/blood , Brain Ischemia/complications , Cognition Disorders/classification , Lipoproteins, LDL/blood , Stroke/blood , Stroke/complications , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Brain Ischemia/psychology , China/epidemiology , Cognition Disorders/complications , Cognition Disorders/epidemiology , Educational Status , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Status and Dementia Tests , Middle Aged , Oxidative Stress , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Stroke/psychology , Young Adult
17.
Parkinsonism Relat Disord ; 43: 73-77, 2017 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28754233

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The Parkinson's Disease-Cognitive Rating Scale (PD-CRS) is a valid and reliable instrument to screen for and diagnose mild cognitive impairment in PD (PD-MCI) and to monitor potential outcomes in clinical trials. Although this scale shows adequate sensitivity to change in non-demented PD patients, an alternative form (AF) with proven reliability could minimize practice effects associated with repeated testing. METHODS: We selected PD-CRS/AF items following the criteria proposed in the original PD-CRS. We assessed a prospective sample of 75 non-demented PD patients (normal cognition, n = 50; PD-MCI, n = 25) using both tools, administered on two consecutive days, in a randomized order. RESULTS: The PD-CRS/AF showed a high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.80). Differences between total mean scores were not significant. Floor/ceiling effects were acceptable. The discriminative power for MCI was high for both tools (area under the curve 0.91; 95% CI, 0.84-0.98 for PD-CRS; 0.88, 95% CI, 0.80-0.96 for PD-CRS/AF). Receiver operating curve analysis showed the optimal cut-off point of the two versions to discriminate PD-MCI from PD-normal cognition was ≤81 (PD-CRS = sensitivity 94%, specificity 73%; PD-CRS/AF = sensitivity 92%, specificity 73%). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the PD-CRS/AF is a valid and reliable instrument to complement the original PD-CRS as an analogous tool for serial cognitive testing for PD patients in clinical practice and cognitive trials.


Subject(s)
Cognition Disorders , Neuropsychological Tests , Parkinson Disease/complications , Aged , Cognition Disorders/classification , Cognition Disorders/diagnosis , Cognition Disorders/etiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Psychometrics , ROC Curve , Reproducibility of Results
18.
Nervenarzt ; 88(8): 858-865, 2017 Aug.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28664265

ABSTRACT

Apraxia is an umbrella term for different disorders of higher motor abilities that are not explained by elementary sensorimotor deficits (e. g. paresis or ataxia). Characteristic features of apraxia that are easy to recognize in clinical practice are difficulties in pantomimed or actual use of tools as well as in imitation of meaningless gestures. Apraxia is bilateral, explaining the cognitive motor disorders and occurs frequently (but not exclusively) after left hemispheric lesions, as well as in neurodegenerative diseases, such as corticobasal syndrome and Alzheimer's disease. Apraxic deficits can seriously impair activities of daily living, which is why the appropriate diagnosis is of great relevance. At the functional anatomical level, different cognitive motor skills rely on at least partly different brain networks, namely, a ventral processing pathway for semantic components, such as tool-action associations, a ventro-dorsal pathway for sensorimotor representations of learnt motor acts, as well as a dorso-dorsal pathway for on-line motor control and, probably, imitation of meaningless gestures. While these networks partially overlap with language-relevant regions, more clear cut dissociations are found between apraxia deficits and disorders of spatial attention. In addition to behavioral interventions, noninvasive neuromodulation approaches, as well as human-computer interface assistance systems are a growing focus of interest for the treatment of apraxia.


Subject(s)
Apraxias/physiopathology , Cognition Disorders/physiopathology , Motor Skills/physiology , Activities of Daily Living/classification , Aphasia/classification , Aphasia/diagnosis , Aphasia/physiopathology , Aphasia/therapy , Apraxias/classification , Apraxias/diagnosis , Apraxias/therapy , Cognition Disorders/classification , Cognition Disorders/diagnosis , Cognition Disorders/therapy , Dementia/classification , Dementia/diagnosis , Dementia/physiopathology , Dementia/therapy , Disability Evaluation , Humans , Models, Neurological , Neural Pathways/physiopathology , Neurodegenerative Diseases/classification , Neurodegenerative Diseases/diagnosis , Neurodegenerative Diseases/physiopathology , Neurodegenerative Diseases/therapy , Neuropsychological Tests , Prognosis
20.
J Alzheimers Dis ; 60(1): 11-21, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28505978

ABSTRACT

The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale's cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) is the most widely used instrument for screening cognitive dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease. The aim of the present study was to develop an Arabic version of this scale (A-ADAS-Cog), examine its psychometric properties (reliability and validity), and provide normative data. The A-ADAS-Cog), an Arabic version of the Mini-Mental State Examination (A-MMSE), and a Standardized Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR) were administered to three Tunisian groups: 124 normal controls (NC), 33 patients with non-Alzheimer dementia (N-AD), and 25 patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). The A-ADAS-Cog scores were significantly affected by age and education. A correction table was constructed to control these effects. The results showed that the A-ADAS-Cog has good internal consistency and reliability (α= 0.82 for AD). The test-retest reliability of the A-ADAS-Cog was stable over time (r = 0.97). An evaluation of the construct validity of the A-ADAS-Cog using principal component analysis led to a solution with three factors (memory, language and praxis), which explained 72% of the variance. The concurrent validity of the A-ADAS-Cog was established using the A-MMSE score (r = -0.86), CDR Sum of Boxes score (CDR-SB; r = 0.87), and global CDR score (CDR-Global; r = 0.74). Finally, the A-ADAS-Cog has an excellent discriminating power in the diagnosis of AD (ROC area = 0.92). A cut-off score of 10 (sensitivity = 84% and specificity = 91%) is indicated for the screening of the AD. Overall, the results indicated that the A-ADAS-Cog is psychometrically reliable and valid and provides promising results for screening of dementia in Arabic speaking patients.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease/complications , Cognition Disorders/diagnosis , Cognition Disorders/etiology , Neuropsychological Tests , Translating , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cognition Disorders/classification , Humans , Middle Aged , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Psychometrics , Reference Values , Reproducibility of Results
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL