Reliability of the 2018 Revised Version of AO/OTA Classification for Femoral Shaft Fractures.

Background: The Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) and the Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) classification system for diaphyseal fracture has been recently revised to refine and enhance the accuracy of fracture categorization. This study aimed to investigate the interobserver reliability of the new AO/OTA classification and to compare it with the older version in femoral shaft fractures. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 139 patients (mean age, 43.8 ± 19.5 years; 92 men and 47 women) with femoral shaft fractures who were treated from 2003 to 2017. Four well-trained observers independently classified each fracture following the previous and revised AO/OTA classification system. We calculated the Fleiss kappa for the interobserver reliability. Results: The previous classification showed the kappa value of 0.580 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.547-0.613), and the revised version showed 0.528 (95% CI, 0.504-0.552). Both the old and the revised versions showed moderate reliability. Conclusions: Our study highlights the moderate interobserver reliability of both the previous and new AO/OTA classification systems for diaphyseal femur fractures. These findings emphasize the importance of standardized systems in clinical decision-making and underscore the need for ongoing education and collaboration to enhance fracture classification.

[Greenstick fractures of the forearm shaft-Is it obligatory or facultative to break the cortex?] / Grünholzfraktur des Unterarmschafts ­ Überbrechen obligatorisch oder fakultativ?

BACKGROUND: To break or not to break-That is the question that has been asked in pediatric traumatology for many years regarding the treatment of greenstick fractures of the diaphyseal forearm shaft. OBJECTIVE: The frequency of greenstick fractures of the forearm shaft in children and adolescents; the influence of breaking the fracture on the refracture rate. METHODS: Analysis and discussion of relevant articles, analysis of the refracture rate of pediatric greenstick fractures of the forearm shaft in our own patient population. RESULTS: Greenstick fractures frequently occur in the area of the forearm shaft and incomplete consolidation leads to an increased refracture rate. In the patient collective of the authors of 420 children with greenstick fractures of the diaphyseal forearm, there was a refracture rate of 9.5%; however, the rate for non-completed fractures was significantly higher compared to the group with completed fractures (15.2% vs. 3%). While in the subgroup of conservatively treated fractures (n = 234), breaking the intact cortex significantly reduced the refracture rate, breaking the intact cortical bone during surgical treatment with elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) did not change the refracture rate. CONCLUSION: As part of the conservative treatment of greenstick fractures of the diaphyseal forearm, completing the fracture can be recommended in order to lower the refracture rate. Completing the fracture does not appear to be necessary during surgical treatment using ESIN.

Reamed intramedullary nailing of diaphyseal multifragmentary femur fractures (AO/OTA 32-C) without fluoroscopy guidance: prospective analysis of methods and short-term outcomes in a low-resource setting.

PURPOSE: To describe the methods and outcomes of reamed intramedullary nailing (IMN) of diaphyseal multifragmentary femur (AO/OTA C2 and C3) fractures (DMFFs) in a low-resource setting without fluoroscopy and fracture table. METHODS: The prospective study involved 35 DMFFs among 318 femur fractures treated ≤ 3 weeks post-injury with SIGN nails. The fractures were fixed without fluoroscopy, fracture table and power reaming. Closed, mini-open or open reduction was done. Anatomical length and alignment were ensured using a surgical support triangle during retrograde nailing, and by an assistant during antegrade nailing. Follow-ups were done at 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 6 months. RESULTS: DMFFs constituted 11.0% of the 318 fractures. Twenty-four (68.6%) were males. The mean age was 39.0 years (range 17-75 years). About 94.3% were injured in road traffic accidents. Fracture reduction was closed in 18, mini-open in 8 and full-open in 9. The operative times were significantly shorter for closed than open reduction (p = 0.001). Five fractures received a supplemental fixation with plate or lag screws. By the 12th post-operative week, 97.1% demonstrated continuing radiographic healing, 94.1% tolerated painless weight-bearing and 91.2% could squat & smile. There was no infection or noticeable rotational malunion. Five fractures healed with a limb-length discrepancy of < 2 cm. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates the feasibility of reamed IMN of DMFFs without fluoroscopy. The outcomes were satisfactory. Although the small sample size and short follow-up period are limitations, the study could serve as a basis for future larger studies in low-resource settings.

[Application of external fixator combined with Kirschner wire fixation for oblique and comminuted distal humeral metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction fractures in children].

Objective: To analyze the effectiveness of external fixator combined with Kirschner wire (EF-KW) fixation in the treatment of oblique and comminuted distal humeral metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction (DHMDJ) fractures in children. Methods: A clinical data of 22 children with DHMDJ fractures who met the selection criteria between April 2021 and December 2023 was retrospectively analyzed. All patients were treated with EF-KW fixation. There were 14 boys and 8 girls with an average age of 6.8 years (range, 1.5-12.0 years). The time from injury to operation was 14-38 hours (mean, 24.2 hours). There were 18 cases of comminuted fractures and 4 cases of oblique fractures; and 1 case of median nerve injury and 1 case of radial nerve injury before operation. The occurrence of postoperative complications was recorded. At last follow-up, the function of the affected elbow joint was evaluated according to the Mayo elbow joint function score, and the Baumann's angle (BA) and humero-capitellar angle (HCA) of the affected and healthy sides were recorded and compared. Results: All fractures were successfully treated with closed reduction and no complications such as nerve injury occurred. Superficial infection occurred in 4 cases after operation and healed after symptomatic treatment. The incisions of other patients healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 9-24 months (mean, 13.8 months). At last follow-up, according to the Mayo elbow joint function score, the elbow joint function was rated as excellent in 15 cases, good in 6 cases, and fair in 1 case, with an excellent and good rate of 95.5%. The neurologic injury before operation recovered gradually. X-ray films reexamination showed that all fractures healed, and the healing time of fractures ranged from 29 to 61 days, with an average of 35.6 days. At last follow-up, there was no significant difference in BA and HCA between the healthy side and the affected side ( P>0.05). During follow-up, 1 case developed mild cubitus varus, while the other patients had no serious complications. Conclusion: EF-KW fixation for oblique and comminuted DHMDJ fractures in children has the advantages of less trauma, simple operation, easy reduction, good stability after reduction, low incidence of serious complications, and good elbow functional recovery.

Risk factors for acute compartment syndrome in one thousand one hundred and forty seven diaphyseal tibia fractures.

PURPOSE: Acute compartment syndrome (ACS) remains a devastating complication of orthopaedic trauma. The tibial diaphysis is especially implicated in the development of ACS, both at the time of injury and after operative management. Identification of risk factors for ACS for these distinct scenarios has been investigated in a large cohort of patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of all adults (age 18 years and older) presenting to a level 1 trauma centre with a diaphyseal tibia fracture. ACS was determined by a combination of clinical signs and symptoms and compartmental pressure monitoring. Potential risk factors were subject to univariate analysis with significant variables undergoing binary logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: 1147 tibial diaphyseal fractures over a twelve year period were studied. Age, multifragmented fracture pattern, male gender, high energy mechanism and intra- articular extension all showed a statistically significant association for ACS. Increasing body mass index (BMI) and treatment with an intramedullary nail favoured development of ACS post-operatively. CONCLUSION: Risk factors for the development of ACS specifically in tibial diaphyseal fractures have been highlighted. Patients managed with IMN or high BMI may warrant particular observation following operative intervention.

In cases of humeral diaphyseal fractures, is lateral approach surgery without radial nerve exploration as effective and safe as conventional surgery?

BACKGROUND: This study compares the efficacy and safety of lateral approach surgery with and without radial nerve dissection in treating humeral diaphyseal fractures. It assesses clinical, radiological, and complication outcomes, providing a description of the surgical methods and perioperative benefits. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 71 patients admitted between May 2015 and December 2022 who underwent lateral approach surgery for humeral diaphyseal fractures. Group 1, consisting of 34 patients without radial nerve dissection, and Group 2, comprising 37 patients with radial nerve dissection, were compared. Parameters such as age, gender, fracture side (right/left), fracture type, follow-up time, surgical duration, blood loss, radiological and clinical evaluations (including Shoulder-Elbow range of motion [ROM] and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score [Q-DASH]), and complications were examined. Surgical techniques and outcomes were documented. RESULTS: Both groups exhibited comparable distributions in age, gender, fracture types, and follow-up times (p>0.05). Group 1 demonstrated significantly lower surgical duration and blood loss compared to Group 2 (p<0.05 for both). Clinical assessment revealed satisfactory shoulder and elbow ROM within functional limits for all patients, with no instances of infection. Q-DASH scores were similar between groups. Postoperative radial nerve palsy occurred in one patient in Group 1 and three patients in Group 2, with all cases resolving uneventfully during outpatient follow-ups. Radiological assessment confirmed uneventful union in all patients. CONCLUSION: Lateral approach surgery without radial nerve dissection for humeral diaphyseal fractures offers comparable effectiveness and safety to conventional surgery, with potential perioperative advantages such as reduced operation time and blood loss.

Does Early Conversion to Below-elbow Casting for Pediatric Diaphyseal Both-bone Forearm Fractures Adversely Affect Patient-reported Outcomes and ROM?

BACKGROUND: For distal forearm fractures in children, it has been shown that a below-elbow cast is an adequate treatment that overcomes the discomfort of an above-elbow cast and unnecessary immobilization of the elbow. For reduced diaphyseal both-bone forearm fractures, our previous randomized controlled trial (RCT)-which compared an above-elbow cast with early conversion to a below-elbow cast-revealed no differences in the risk of redisplacement or functional outcomes at short-term follow-up. Although studies with a longer follow-up after diaphyseal both-bone forearm fractures in children are scarce, they are essential, as growth might affect the outcome. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: In this secondary analysis of an earlier RCT, we asked: (1) Does early conversion from an above-elbow to a below-elbow cast in children with reduced, stable diaphyseal forearm fractures result in worse clinical and radiological outcome? (2) Does a malunion result in inferior clinical outcomes at 7.5 years of follow-up? METHODS: In this study, we evaluated children at a minimum of 5 years of follow-up who were included in a previous RCT. The median (range) duration of follow-up was 7.5 years (5.2 to 9.9). The patients for this RCT were included from the emergency departments of four different urban hospitals. Between January 2006 and August 2010, we treated 128 patients for reduced diaphyseal both-bone forearm fractures. All 128 patients were eligible; 24% (31) were excluded because they were lost before the minimum study follow-up or had incomplete datasets, leaving 76% (97) for secondary analysis. The loss in the follow-up group was comparable to the included population. Eligible patients were invited for secondary functional and radiographic assessment. The primary outcome was the difference in forearm rotation compared with the uninjured contralateral arm. Secondary outcomes were the ABILHAND-kids and QuickDASH questionnaire, loss of flexion and extension of the elbow and wrist compared with the contralateral forearm, JAMAR grip strength ratio, and radiological assessment of residual deformity. The study was not blinded regarding the children, parents, and clinicians. RESULTS: At 7.5-year follow-up, there were no differences in ABILHAND-kids questionnaire score (above-elbow cast: 41 ± 2.4 versus above/below-elbow cast: 41.7 ± 0.7, mean difference -0.7 [95% confidence interval (CI) -1.4 to 0.04]; p = 0.06), QuickDASH (above-elbow cast: 5.8 ± 9.6 versus 2.9 ± 6.0 for above-/below-elbow cast, mean difference 2.9 [95% CI -0.5 to 6.2]; p = 0.92), and grip strength (0.9 ± 0.2 for above-elbow cast versus 1 ± 0.2 for above/below-elbow cast, mean difference -0.04 [95% CI -1 to 0.03]; p = 0.24). Functional outcomes showed no difference (loss of forearm rotation: above-elbow cast 7.9 ± 17.7 versus 4.1 ± 6.9 for above-/below-elbow cast, mean difference 3.8 [95% CI -1.7 to 9.4]; p = 0.47; arc of motion: above-elbow cast 152° ± 21° versus 155° ± 11° for the above/below-elbow cast group, mean difference -2.5 [95% CI -9.3 to -4.4]; p = 0.17; loss of wrist flexion-extension: above-elbow cast group 1.0° ± 5.0° versus 0.6° ± 4.2° for above/below-elbow cast, mean difference 0.4° [95% CI -1.5° to 2.2°]; p = 0.69). The secondary follow-up showed improvement in forearm rotation in both groups compared with the rotation at 7 months. For radiographical analysis, the only difference was in AP ulna (above-elbow cast: 6° ± 3° versus above/below-elbow cast: 5° ± 2°, mean difference 1.8° [0.7° to 3°]; p = 0.003), although this is likely not clinically relevant. There were no differences in the other parameters. Thirteen patients with persistent malunion at 7-month follow-up showed no clinically relevant differences in functional outcomes at 7.5-year follow-up compared with children without malunion. The loss of forearm rotation was 5.5ׄ° ± 9.1° for the malunion group compared with 6.0° ± 13.9° in the no malunion group, with a mean difference of 0.4 (95% CI of -7.5 to 8.4; p = 0.92). CONCLUSION: In light of these results, we suggest that surgeons perform an early conversion to a below-elbow cast for reduced diaphyseal both-bone forearm fractures in children. This study shows that even in patients with secondary fracture displacement, remodeling occurred. And even in persistent malunion, these patients mostly showed good-to-excellent final results. Future studies, such as a meta-analysis or a large, prospective observational study, would help to establish the influence of skeletal age, sex, and the severity and direction of malunion angulation of both the radius and ulna on clinical result. Furthermore, a similar systematic review could prove beneficial in clarifying the acceptable angulation for pediatric lower extremity fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, therapeutic study.

Findings Associated With Nonaccidental Trauma in Children With Isolated Femoral Diaphyseal Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric patients with isolated femoral diaphyseal fractures are difficult to assess for nonaccidental trauma (NAT). The purpose of this study was to determine (1) if there are any demographic features of isolated femoral diaphyseal fractures associated with suspected NAT and (2) if there are clinical signs associated with isolated femoral diaphyseal fractures associated with suspected NAT. METHODS: All patients with femoral diaphyseal fractures from January 2010 to June 2018 were reviewed. We included patients younger than 4 years old with isolated femoral diaphyseal fractures. We excluded patients 4 years old and older, polytraumas, motor vehicle collisions, and patients with altered bone biology. Diagnosis of suspected NAT was determined by review of a documented social work assessment. We recorded fracture characteristics including location along femur as well as fracture pattern and presence of associated findings on NAT workup including the presence of retinal hemorrhage, subdural hematoma, evidence of prior fracture, or cutaneous lesions. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of these associated findings were calculated. RESULTS: Totally, 144 patients met the inclusion criteria. Social work was consulted on 50 patients (35%). Suspected NAT was diagnosed in 27 patients (19%). The average age of patients with suspected NAT was 0.82 and 2.25 years in patients without NAT ( P <0.01). The rate and type of skin lesions present on exam were not different between the 2 groups. Patients with suspected NAT had no findings of retinal hemorrhage or subdural hematoma, but 5 of 27 patients (19%) had evidence of prior fracture on skeletal survey. The sensitivities of retinal hemorrhage, subdural, and skeletal survey were 0%, 0%, and 19% and the specificities of all were 100%. The NPVs were 39%, 27%, and 63%, respectively. The PPV of skeletal survey was 100%. Since there were no patients in this study with positive findings of retinal hemorrhage or subdural hematoma, the PPV for these could not be assessed. CONCLUSIONS: In the current study, signs of NAT such as skin lesions, retinal hemorrhage, subdural hematoma, and evidence of prior fracture on skeletal survey may not be helpful to diagnosis suspected NAT in patients with an isolated femoral diaphyseal fracture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-diagnostic study.

External fixator versus elastic stable intramedullary nail for treatment of metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction fractures of the pediatric distal femur: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Several methods have been used for the treatment of pediatric distal femoral fractures, such as elastic stable intramedullary nail (ESIN), external fixator (EF) and plate osteosynthesis, but there has been no consensus about the optimal method. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcome between EF and ESIN techniques used in metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction (MDJ) fractures of the pediatric distal femur. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed operatively treated MDJ fractures of pediatric distal femur between January 2015 and January 2022. Patient charts were reviewed for demographics, injury and data of radiography. All of the patients were divided into EF and ESIN groups according to the operation techniques. Malalignment was defined as more than 5 degrees of angular deformity in either plane. Clinical outcomes were measured by Flynn scoring system. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were included in this study, among which, 23 were treated with EF, and 15 with ESIN. The mean follow-up time was 18 months (12-24 months). At the final follow-up, all of the fractures were healed. Although there were no statistical differences between the two groups in demographic data, length of stay, estimated blood loss (EBL), rate of open reduction, time to fracture healing and Flynn score, the EF was superior to ESIN in operative time, fluoroscopic exposure and time to partial weight-bearing. The EF group had a significantly higher rate of skin irritation, while the ESIN had a significantly higher rate of malalignment. CONCLUSION: EF and ESIN are both effective methods in the treatment of MDJ fractures of the pediatric distal femur. ESIN is associated with lower rates of skin irritation. However, EF technique has the advantages of shorter operative time, reduced fluoroscopic exposure, and shorter time to partial weight-bearing, as well as lower incidence of malalignment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

[Research progress in the treatment of distal humeral metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction fracture in children].

Objective: To summarize the research progress in the treatment of distal humeral metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction (DHMDJ) fractures in children and to provide reference for clinical practice. Methods: The characteristics and treatment methods of transverse and comminuted DHMDJ fractures in children were summarized and analyzed by referring to relevant literature at home and abroad. Results: DHMDJ fractures in children are not uncommon clinically, with high fracture line position, multi-directional instability, difficult closed reduction in treatment, and easy to cause complications such as coronal and sagittal deformity of the elbow. The Kirschner wire technique was effective for DHMDJ fractures with the fracture line at the middle and low levels, but was prone to iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury. Elastic stable intramedullary nail is suitable for higher-position transverse DHMDJ fractures. However, this technique requires a second operation to remove the internal fixator, and may cause iatrogenic epiphysis plate injury in children. External fixator is a new way to treat DHMDJ fractures, and it can show satisfactory results for transverse and comminuted DHMDJ fractures. However, at present, there are few relevant studies, and most of them focus on biomechanical studies, and the efficacy lacks high-quality clinical research support. Conclusion: The ultimate goal of DHMDJ fracture treatment in children is to restore the anatomical alignment of the fracture and prevent the loss of reduction. The choice of internal fixator depends on the location of the fracture line and the shape of the fracture to provide personalized treatment.

Interlocking intramedullary nail for forearm diaphyseal fractures in adults-A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes and complications.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review is to examine the outcomes, complications, and potential advantages of using anatomical interlocking intramedullary nails (IMN) in the treatment of radius and ulnar shaft diaphyseal fractures in adults. METHODS: Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases were searched between January 2000 and January 2023. Studies meeting criteria were observational or randomized controlled trials evaluating outcomes in IMN for adult diaphyseal forearm fractures. Standardized data extraction was performed and a quality assessment tool was used to evaluate individual study methodology. Descriptive statistics for interventions, functional outcomes, and complications were reported. Meta-analysis was performed for patient-reported outcome measures and operative time. RESULTS: A total of 29 studies involving 1268 patients were included with 764 (60%) undergoing IMN, 21% open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), and 9% hybrid fixation. There was no significant difference between groups in DASH and Grace-Eversmann scores. Operative time was significantly shorter in IMN compared with ORIF. The DASH scores were: 13.1 ± 6.04 for IMN, 10.17 ± 3.98 for ORIF, and 15.5 ± 0.63 in hybrids. Mean operative time was 65.3 ± 28.7 in ORIF and 50.8 ± 17.7 in IMN. Complication rates were 16.7% in the IMN group, 14.9% in ORIF, and 6.3% in hybrid constructs. There were 11 cases of extensor pollicis rupture in the IMN group. Average IMN pronation and supination were 78.3° ± 7.9° and 73° ± 5.0°, respectively. Average ORIF pronation and supination was 82.15° ± 1.9° and 79.7° ± 4.5°, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Similar functional outcomes and complication rates along with shorter operative times can be achieved with IMN compared with ORIF. The use of IMN is promising, however, higher quality evidence is required to assess appropriate indications, subtle differences in range of motion, implant-related complications, and cost-effectiveness. Trail Registration PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) (ID: CRD42022362353).

Circular frame versus reamed intramedullary tibial nail in the treatment of grade III open tibial diaphyseal fractures.

BACKGROUND: Grade III open tibial diaphyseal fractures are challenging to treat and controversy exists on whether to treat them with an intramedullary nail (IMN) or a circular frame (CF). This study aims to compare outcomes for intramedullary nail and circular frame in the treatment of open tibial diaphyseal fractures. METHODOLOGY: Retrospective study at a major trauma center of all patients admitted with a grade III open tibial diaphyseal fracture between January 2016 and January 2022. The primary outcome measures were major complications: non-union, malunion, refracture, DBI and amputation. Secondary outcome measures were time to union and reoperation rates. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were included in the study, 32 patients in CF group and 23 patients in IMN group. There were no significant differences in the baseline demographics of patients in both groups. Major complications were recorded in 13 limbs (54%) in IMN group and in 18 limbs (56%) in CF group which were not statistically significant (p = 0.797). Deep bone infection rates were noted in 4 (12.5%) in the CF group, compared to 1 (4%) in IMN group; however, the result was not statistically significant (p = 0.240). Amputation rates as a result of infected non-unions were seen in 1 limb (4%) in IMN group and 2 limbs (6%) in CF group (p = 0.99). Median time to union was significantly shorter in IMN group at 30 weeks compared to 30 weeks for CF group (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: IMN should be the treatment of choice in the treatment of grade III open tibial diaphyseal fracture, but CF should be considered for delayed treatment and in patients with bone loss.

Is intramedullary nailing of femoral diaphyseal fractures in the lateral decubitus position as safe and effective as on a traction table?

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the radiological and clinical results of femoral diaphyseal fractures operated in the lateral decubitus position with those operated in the supine position on a traction table and to detail the perioperative surgical technique. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between October 2018 and January 2022, in this prospective, randomized, and single-blind comparative study, 75 patients diagnosed with adult femoral diaphyseal fractures to whom intramedullary nails were applied were operated in the lateral decubitus position without a traction table (Group 1, 37 patients) and in the supine position with a traction table (Group 2, 38 patients). Preoperative age, gender, fracture mechanism, fracture type, and surgical waiting times were determined. Perioperative anesthesia type, surgery preparation time, surgical time, number of fluoroscopy doses, amount of bleeding, and type of reduction were evaluated, and detailed observational descriptions of the surgical techniques were made. In the postoperative period, radiological evaluations were made with x-ray radiography and orthoroentgenogram, while in the clinical evaluation, hip-knee joint range of motion and rotational evaluation were made with the Craigs test. Follow-up periods were determined and complications noted. RESULTS: The average age was 32 in Group 1 and 28 in Group 2, the female/male ratio was 1:36 in Group 1 and 5:33 in Group 2, and the follow-up period was 18.2 months Group 1 and 21.7 months in Group 2. No significant difference was detected between the groups in terms of age, gender, fracture mechanism, fracture type, anesthesia type, surgical waiting time, and follow-up period (p > 0.05). Compared to Group 2, the shorter preparation time, surgical time, and number of fluoroscopy doses in Group 1 were found to be statistically significant (p < 0.05). The differences in the amount of bleeding and need for open reduction were not statistically significant between the groups (p > 0.05), and no statistical difference was found in joint range of motion and rotational evaluation in clinical evaluation in both groups (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in terms of complications between groups. CONCLUSIONS: We found the lateral decubitus method without a traction table to be a safe and effective alternative to the supine method with a traction table in terms of the radiological and clinical results and that it also has the advantages of shortening the surgical time, reducing radiation exposure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 1 prospective, randomized, single-blind controlled study.

Is Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing a Viable Treatment Option for Diaphyseal Fractures of the Humerus in Adults? A 29-case Series Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Humerus shaft fractures are common in orthopaedic practice. The emphasis in treatment has shifted from prolonged immobilisation to early mobilisation and internal fixation when needed for a quicker return to normal function. Internal fixation methods include plate osteosynthesis and intramedullary nailing. This study specifically evaluated the effectiveness of flexible intramedullary nails in treating diaphyseal humeral fractures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between April 2007 and January 2010, Alexandria University Hospital treated 29 patients (21 males, 8 females) with diaphyseal humeral fractures. Treatment involved closed reduction and percutaneous fixation using two flexible nails. Patients, aged 17 to 65 with a mean age of 32, were included if they did not have pathological fractures, were above 16 years old, and were medically suitable. Causes included pedestrian vehicle accidents (17 cases) and falls or sports-related activities (12 cases). Surgical intervention occurred 1 to 8 days after the injury. RESULTS: Between April 2007 and January 2010, Alexandria University Hospital treated 29 patients (21 males, 8 females) for diaphyseal humeral fractures using closed reduction and percutaneous fixation with two flexible nails. Patients, aged 17 to 65, were monitored for an average of 18 months. Radiographic assessments showed complete union in nineteen fractures within 13 to 21 weeks. One patient experienced non-union but was successfully treated with bone grafting and plating. There were no significant intraoperative complications. Notably, four patients with preoperative radial nerve injuries recovered within 6 to 8 weeks. Evaluation using the Stewart and Hundley Scoring technique showed excellent outcomes for 60% of patients, good outcomes for 30%, fair outcomes for 5%, and poor outcomes for 5%. CONCLUSIONS: 1.The Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing (ESIN) technique shows promise in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures. 2. However, the success of treatment may depend on various factors, including patient age, fracture characteristics, and the presence of complications such as open fractures and radial nerve palsy. 3. Careful consideration of these factors is necessary when selecting a treatment approach for humeral shaft fractures.

Fracture pattern analysis of fractures to the diaphysis of the fifth metatarsal.

BACKGROUND: Fractures to the fifth's metatarsal (MT-V) diaphysis are common. These are inconsistently referred to as diaphyseal-, shaft-, or Dancer's fractures. A comprehensive analysis of the MT-V fracture morphology is missing. The aim was to qualitatively and quantitatively analyze fracture patterns of MT-V diaphyseal fractures. HYPOTHESIS: Fractures to the shaft of the fifth metatarsal feature specific fracture morphologies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective, radiologic database study. Included were all acute, isolated MT-V shaft fractures (including the proximal [Lawrence and Botte (L&B) III] and distal meta-diaphysis). Demographics and fracture characteristics were assessed. Each proximal fracture line was drawn, scaled, and a qualitative and quantitative fracture line analysis was conducted. The quantitative fracture line analysis aimed at identifying dens clusters with arbitrary shape using the DBSCAN algorithm. Data are presented as mean±standard deviation. RESULTS: Out of 704 eligible MT-V fractures, 156 met the inclusion criteria. Patient's mean age was 46±19 years and 94% suffered a low energy trauma. Qualitative and quantitative fracture line analysis revealed three distinct fracture patterns. The proximal (30%) and distal (5%) meta-diaphyseal clusters showed a predominant transverse fracture pattern. The vast majority of diaphyseal fractures (56%) were spiral/oblique fractures, progressing from the proximal lateral meta-diaphyseal region in an oblique course at 61±9° to the medial distal diaphyseal cortex. Seven percent of diaphyseal fractures showed a transverse fracture pattern. DISCUSSION: Based on a qualitative and quantitative analysis of all MT-V shaft fractures, three distinct fracture clusters were identified with homogeneous fracture patterns. MT-V shaft fractures should therefore be classified as proximal meta-diaphyseal (L&B Type III), diaphyseal (oblique or transverse) and distal meta-diaphyseal. LEVEL OF PROOF: IV; retrospective database study.

Nonunion of Diaphyseal Humerus Fracture in an Infant: A Case Report.

CASE: A 9-month-old infant girl with Down syndrome presented with an atrophic nonunion of the right humerus diaphysis secondary to birth trauma. Surgical intervention included open reduction and external fixation plus cadaveric cancellous bone allograft and platelet-rich plasma and then was changed to an external fixator in axial compression. At 16 months after surgery, bone healing was achieved. CONCLUSION: Nonunions in infants are rare, and their treatment is a challenge; an adequate vascular supply with good stabilization and reduction are keys to management. We believe that the improvement in reduction and stability under axial compression were the keys to achieve consolidation.

Feline Diaphyseal Fractures: Management and treatment options.

PRACTICAL RELEVANCE: Cats frequently present with diaphyseal fractures, which require treatment in order to achieve a good return to function. These fractures often occur due to significant trauma; for example, as a result of road traffic accidents, high-rise syndrome and dog bite wounds. The first priority is to ensure the patient is systemically well before embarking on any specific surgical treatment of a fracture. CLINICAL CHALLENGES: Surgical management of diaphyseal fractures can be challenging due to the surgical approach for some bones being technically demanding, for example because of the presence of important neurovascular structures, and the small size of feline bones, which limits the choice of implant size and strength. Further, it may be difficult to visualise fracture alignment when using minimally invasive techniques, although the use of intraoperative fluoroscopy can aid with this, and malalignment can be common for some fracture repairs, particularly in cases where anatomical reconstruction is not possible. AIMS: This review focuses on diaphyseal long bone fractures and aims to assist decision-making, with an overview of the management and treatment options available. EVIDENCE BASE: Many textbooks and original articles have been published on aspects of managing fractures in small animals. The authors also provide recommendations based upon their own clinical experience.