Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 1.447
Filter
1.
J Med Case Rep ; 18(1): 319, 2024 Jul 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38961428

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Myasthenic crisis (MC) is a life-threatening complication of myasthenia gravis (MG), necessitating ventilation. Achieving a safe and timely diagnosis of myasthenic crisis with atypical, isolated presentation is a considerable challenge particularly in elderly patients, where myasthenia gravis can present with isolated dysarthria in rare instances, giving a clinical impression of lacunar stroke. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a compelling case of a 73-year-old Caucasian female presenting with abrupt onset of isolated dysarthria. Despite initial treatment for a presumed lacunar stroke, subsequent evaluations led to her diagnosis of a myasthenic crisis. Within 72 h of admission, the patient developed dysphagia and shortness of breath, requiring supplemental oxygen. The case highlights the sequential progression of events from the atypical presentation of isolated dysarthria and its course to the management of a myasthenic crisis. CONCLUSION: Our reported case focuses on the discussion of myasthenia that mimicked a lacunar stroke and was finally diagnosed at a critical time of medical crisis. This case highlights the imperative notion that isolated dysarthria in elderly individuals warrants vigilant monitoring for possible myasthenia gravis, given the low incidence of lacunar stroke presenting with only dysarthria.


Subject(s)
Dysarthria , Myasthenia Gravis , Stroke, Lacunar , Humans , Myasthenia Gravis/diagnosis , Myasthenia Gravis/complications , Aged , Dysarthria/etiology , Female , Diagnosis, Differential , Stroke, Lacunar/diagnosis , Stroke, Lacunar/complications , Cholinesterase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Deglutition Disorders/etiology , Deglutition Disorders/diagnosis , Dyspnea/etiology
2.
BMJ ; 386: e078341, 2024 07 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38986549

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical effectiveness of two speech and language therapy approaches versus no speech and language therapy for dysarthria in people with Parkinson's disease. DESIGN: Pragmatic, UK based, multicentre, three arm, parallel group, unblinded, randomised controlled trial. SETTING: The speech and language therapy interventions were delivered in outpatient or home settings between 26 September 2016 and 16 March 2020. PARTICIPANTS: 388 people with Parkinson's disease and dysarthria. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups (1:1:1): 130 to Lee Silverman voice treatment (LSVT LOUD), 129 to NHS speech and language therapy, and 129 to no speech and language therapy. LSVT LOUD consisted of four, face-to-face or remote, 50 min sessions each week delivered over four weeks. Home based practice activities were set for up to 5-10 mins daily on treatment days and 15 mins twice daily on non-treatment days. Dosage for the NHS speech and language therapy was determined by the local therapist in response to the participants' needs (estimated from prior research that NHS speech and language therapy participants would receive an average of one session per week over six to eight weeks). Local practices for NHS speech and language therapy were accepted, except for those within the LSVT LOUD protocol. Analyses were based on the intention to treat principle. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was total score at three months of self-reported voice handicap index. RESULTS: People who received LSVT LOUD reported lower voice handicap index scores at three months after randomisation than those who did not receive speech and language therapy (-8.0 points (99% confidence interval -13.3 to -2.6); P<0.001). No evidence suggests a difference in voice handicap index scores between NHS speech and language therapy and no speech and language therapy (1.7 points (-3.8 to 7.1); P=0.43). Patients in the LSVT LOUD group also reported lower voice handicap index scores than did those randomised to NHS speech and language therapy (-9.6 points (-14.9 to -4.4); P<0.001). 93 adverse events (predominately vocal strain) were reported in the LSVT LOUD group, 46 in the NHS speech and language therapy group, and none in the no speech and language therapy group. No serious adverse events were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: LSVT LOUD was more effective at reducing the participant reported impact of voice problems than was no speech and language therapy and NHS speech and language therapy. NHS speech and language therapy showed no evidence of benefit compared with no speech and language therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN registry ISRCTN12421382.


Subject(s)
Dysarthria , Language Therapy , Parkinson Disease , Speech Therapy , Humans , Parkinson Disease/complications , Dysarthria/etiology , Dysarthria/therapy , Dysarthria/rehabilitation , Male , Female , Speech Therapy/methods , Aged , Language Therapy/methods , United Kingdom , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Voice Training , State Medicine
3.
Eur J Paediatr Neurol ; 51: 62-70, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38851145

ABSTRACT

RESEARCH PURPOSE: GLUT1 deficiency syndrome (GLUT1DS) is a rare genetic disorder caused by a mutation in the SLC2A1 gene that limits the transport of glucose across the blood-brain barrier. Speech disorders and dysarthria are typical findings in patients with GLUT1DS, but have never been deeply phenotyped. The aim of the present study was to characterize speech abilities in a sample of patients with GLUT1DS. RESULTS: 30 patients with GLUT1DS were recruited. We reported impairments in different speech and oromotor domains: the speech was characterized by dysarthria, inaccurate articulation of consonants, abnormal nasal resonance, errors in intonation and prosody and low intelligibility. We observed difficulties in motor planning and programming. Moreover, we observed a significant difference between the dysarthric level of impairment with genotype groups. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of a speech disorder in patients with GLUT1DS represents a core feature of the syndrome. Our findings suggest that patients with GLUT1DS would benefit from a comprehensive neurocognitive assessment to detect strengths and weaknesses of the speech profile. Understanding the speech and language phenotype in GLUT1DS is critical for planning early intervention to positively influence the global development of patients with GLUT1DS.


Subject(s)
Carbohydrate Metabolism, Inborn Errors , Dysarthria , Glucose Transporter Type 1 , Humans , Dysarthria/etiology , Dysarthria/genetics , Male , Female , Child , Child, Preschool , Adolescent , Glucose Transporter Type 1/genetics , Glucose Transporter Type 1/deficiency , Carbohydrate Metabolism, Inborn Errors/genetics , Carbohydrate Metabolism, Inborn Errors/complications , Carbohydrate Metabolism, Inborn Errors/diagnosis , Monosaccharide Transport Proteins/deficiency , Monosaccharide Transport Proteins/genetics , Adult , Young Adult
4.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol ; 33(4): 1930-1951, 2024 Jul 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38838243

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study investigated the effects of the SPEAK OUT! & LOUD Crowd therapy program on speaking rate, percent pause time, intelligibility, naturalness, and communicative participation in individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD). METHOD: Six adults with PD completed 12 individual SPEAK OUT! sessions across four consecutive weeks followed by group-based LOUD Crowd sessions for five consecutive weeks. Most therapy sessions were conducted via telehealth, with two participants completing the SPEAK OUT! portion in person. Speech samples were recorded at six time points: three baseline time points prior to SPEAK OUT!, two post-SPEAK OUT! time points, and one post-LOUD Crowd time point. Acoustic measures of speaking rate and percent pause time and listener ratings of speech intelligibility and naturalness were obtained for each time point. Participant self-ratings of communicative participation were also collected at pre- and posttreatment time points. RESULTS: Results showed significant improvement in communicative participation scores at a group level following completion of the SPEAK OUT! & LOUD Crowd treatment program. Two participants showed a significant decrease in speaking rate and increase in percent pause time following treatment. Changes in intelligibility and naturalness were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide preliminary support for the effectiveness of the SPEAK OUT! & LOUD Crowd treatment program in improving communicative participation for people with mild-to-moderate hypokinetic dysarthria secondary to PD. This study is also the first to demonstrate positive effects of this treatment program for people receiving the therapy via telehealth.


Subject(s)
Parkinson Disease , Speech Intelligibility , Speech Production Measurement , Speech Therapy , Humans , Parkinson Disease/complications , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Male , Female , Aged , Middle Aged , Speech Therapy/methods , Dysarthria/etiology , Dysarthria/therapy , Dysarthria/rehabilitation , Treatment Outcome , Speech Acoustics , Time Factors , Voice Quality , Telemedicine
6.
Mol Genet Metab ; 142(3): 108510, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38843620

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Information about dysarthria and dysphagia in mitochondrial diseases (MD) is scarce. However, this knowledge is needed to identify speech and swallowing problems early, to monitor the disease course, and to develop and offer optimal treatment and support. This study therefore aims to examine the prevalence and severity of dysarthria and dysphagia in patients with MD and its relation to clinical phenotype and disease severity. Secondary aim is to determine clinically relevant outcome measures for natural history studies and clinical trials. METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional medical record study includes adults (age ≥ 18 years) diagnosed with genetically confirmed MD who participated in a multidisciplinary admission within the Radboud center for mitochondrial medicine between January 2015 and April 2023. Dysarthria and dysphagia were examined by administering the Radboud dysarthria assessment, swallowing speed, dysphagia limit, test of mastication and swallowing solids (TOMASS), and 6-min mastication test (6MMT). The disease severity was assessed using the Newcastle mitochondrial disease scale for adults (NMDAS). RESULTS: The study included 224 patients with MD with a median age of 42 years of whom 37.5% were male. The pooled prevalence of dysarthria was 33.8% and of dysphagia 35%. Patients with MD showed a negative deviation from the norm on swallowing speed, TOMASS (total time) and the 6MMT. Furthermore, a significant moderate relation was found between the presence of dysarthria and the clinical phenotypes. There was a statistically significant difference in total time on the TOMASS between the clinical phenotypes. Finally, disease severity showed a significant moderate relation with the severity of dysarthria and a significant weak relation with the severity of dysphagia. CONCLUSION: Dysarthria and dysphagia occur in about one-third of patients with MD. It is important for treating physicians to pay attention to this subject because of the influence of both disorders on social participation and wellbeing. Referral to a speech and language therapist should therefore be considered, especially in patients with a more severe clinical phenotype. The swallowing speed, TOMASS and 6MMT are the most clinically relevant tests to administer.


Subject(s)
Deglutition Disorders , Dysarthria , Mitochondrial Diseases , Humans , Deglutition Disorders/etiology , Deglutition Disorders/physiopathology , Dysarthria/etiology , Dysarthria/physiopathology , Male , Female , Mitochondrial Diseases/complications , Mitochondrial Diseases/physiopathology , Adult , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Aged , Severity of Illness Index , Prevalence , Deglutition , Young Adult , Phenotype
7.
J Commun Disord ; 109: 106428, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38744198

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study examines whether there are differences in the speech of speakers with dysarthria, speakers with apraxia and healthy speakers in spectral acoustic measures during production of the central-peninsular Spanish alveolar sibilant fricative /s/. METHOD: To this end, production of the sibilant was analyzed in 20 subjects with dysarthria, 8 with apraxia of speech and 28 healthy speakers. Participants produced 12 sV(C) words. The variables compared across groups were the fricative's spectral amplitude difference (AmpD) and spectral moments in the temporal midpoint of fricative execution. RESULTS: The results indicate that individuals with dysarthria can be distinguished from healthy speakers in terms of the spectral characteristics AmpD, standard deviation (SD), center of gravity (CoG) and skewness, the last two in context with unrounded vowel, while no differences in kurtosis were detected. Participants with AoS group differ significantly from healthy speaker group in AmpD, SD and CoG and Kurtosis, the first one followed unrounded vowel and the latter two followed by rounded vowels. In addition, speakers with apraxia of speech group returned significant differences with respect to speakers with dysarthria group in AmpD, CoG and skewness. CONCLUSIONS: The differences found between the groups in the measures studied as a function of the type of vowel context could provide insights into the distinctive manifestations of motor speech disorders, contributing to the differential diagnosis between apraxia and dysarthria in motor control processes.


Subject(s)
Apraxias , Dysarthria , Speech Acoustics , Humans , Dysarthria/physiopathology , Dysarthria/etiology , Apraxias/physiopathology , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , Aged , Phonetics , Speech Production Measurement
8.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol ; 33(4): 1952-1964, 2024 Jul 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38809826

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The current study compared temporal and spectral acoustic contrast between vowel segments produced by speakers with dysarthria across three speech tasks-interactive, solo habitual, and solo clear. METHOD: Nine speakers with dysarthria secondary to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis participated in the study. Each speaker was paired with a typical interlocutor over videoconferencing software. The speakers produced the vowels /i, ɪ, ɛ, æ/ in /h/-vowel-/d/ words. For the solo tasks, speakers read the stimuli aloud in both their habitual and clear speaking styles. For the interactive task, speakers produced a target stimulus for their interlocutor to select among the four possibilities. We measured the duration difference between long and short vowels, as well as the F1/F2 Euclidean distance between adjacent vowels, and also determined how well the vowels could be classified based on their acoustic characteristics. RESULTS: Temporal contrast between long and short vowels was higher in the interactive task than in both solo tasks. Spectral distance between adjacent vowel pairs was also higher for some pairs in the interactive task than the habitual speech task. Finally, vowel classification accuracy was highest in the interactive task. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, we found evidence that individuals with dysarthria produced vowels with greater acoustic contrast in structured interactions than they did in solo tasks. Furthermore, the speech adjustments they made to the vowel segments differed from those observed in solo speech.


Subject(s)
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis , Dysarthria , Phonetics , Speech Acoustics , Speech Production Measurement , Humans , Dysarthria/etiology , Dysarthria/physiopathology , Dysarthria/diagnosis , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/complications , Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/physiopathology , Speech Intelligibility , Voice Quality , Preliminary Data , Sound Spectrography , Time Factors , Aged, 80 and over , Acoustics
10.
J Neural Transm (Vienna) ; 131(7): 791-797, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38592459

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Hypokinetic dysarthria (HD) is a common motor speech symptom of Parkinson's disease (PD) which does not respond well to PD treatments. We investigated short-term effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on HD in PD using acoustic analysis of speech. Based on our previous studies we focused on stimulation of the right superior temporal gyrus (STG) - an auditory feedback area. METHODS: In 14 PD patients with HD, we applied anodal, cathodal and sham tDCS to the right STG using a cross-over design. A protocol consisting of speech tasks was performed prior to and immediately after each stimulation session. Linear mixed models were used for the evaluation of the effects of each stimulation condition on the relative change of acoustic parameters. We also performed a simulation of the mean electric field induced by tDCS. RESULTS: Linear mixed model showed a statistically significant effect of the stimulation condition on the relative change of median duration of silences longer than 50 ms (p = 0.015). The relative change after the anodal stimulation (mean = -5.9) was significantly lower as compared to the relative change after the sham stimulation (mean = 12.8), p = 0.014. We also found a correlation between the mean electric field magnitude in the right STG and improvement of articulation precision after anodal tDCS (R = 0.637; p = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: The exploratory study showed that anodal tDCS applied over the auditory feedback area may lead to shorter pauses in a speech of PD patients.


Subject(s)
Parkinson Disease , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , Humans , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Parkinson Disease/complications , Parkinson Disease/physiopathology , Pilot Projects , Male , Female , Aged , Middle Aged , Cross-Over Studies , Dysarthria/etiology , Dysarthria/therapy , Dysarthria/physiopathology , Speech/physiology , Treatment Outcome , Temporal Lobe/physiopathology
11.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol ; 33(3): 1390-1405, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38530396

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Changes in voice and speech are characteristic symptoms of Huntington's disease (HD). Objective methods for quantifying speech impairment that can be used across languages could facilitate assessment of disease progression and intervention strategies. The aim of this study was to analyze acoustic features to identify language-independent features that could be used to quantify speech dysfunction in English-, Spanish-, and Polish-speaking participants with HD. METHOD: Ninety participants with HD and 83 control participants performed sustained vowel, syllable repetition, and reading passage tasks recorded with previously validated methods using mobile devices. Language-independent features that differed between HD and controls were identified. Principal component analysis (PCA) and unsupervised clustering were applied to the language-independent features of the HD data set to identify subgroups within the HD data. RESULTS: Forty-six language-independent acoustic features that were significantly different between control participants and participants with HD were identified. Following dimensionality reduction using PCA, four speech clusters were identified in the HD data set. Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) total motor score, total functional capacity, and composite UHDRS were significantly different for pairwise comparisons of subgroups. The percentage of HD participants with higher dysarthria score and disease stage also increased across clusters. CONCLUSION: The results support the application of acoustic features to objectively quantify speech impairment and disease severity in HD in multilanguage studies. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.25447171.


Subject(s)
Huntington Disease , Speech Acoustics , Speech Production Measurement , Humans , Huntington Disease/diagnosis , Huntington Disease/complications , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Aged , Dysarthria/diagnosis , Dysarthria/etiology , Dysarthria/physiopathology , Principal Component Analysis , Voice Quality , Speech Disorders/diagnosis , Speech Disorders/etiology , Predictive Value of Tests
12.
J Med Internet Res ; 26: e56417, 2024 Apr 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38509662

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Dysarthria is a common poststroke speech disorder affecting communication and psychological well-being. Traditional speech therapy is effective but often poses challenges in terms of accessibility and patient adherence. Emerging smartphone-based therapies may offer promising alternatives for the treatment of poststroke dysarthria. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the efficacy and feasibility of smartphone-based speech therapy for improving speech intelligibility in patients with acute and early subacute poststroke dysarthria. This study also explored the impact of the intervention on psychological well-being, user experience, and overall feasibility in a clinical setting. METHODS: Participants were divided into 2 groups for this randomized, evaluator-blinded trial. The intervention group used a smartphone-based speech therapy app for 1 hour per day, 5 days per week, for 4 weeks, with guideline-based standard stroke care. The control group received standard guideline-based stroke care and rehabilitation. Speech intelligibility, psychological well-being, quality of life, and user acceptance were assessed using repeated measures ANOVA. RESULTS: In this study, 40 patients with poststroke dysarthria were enrolled, 32 of whom completed the trial (16 in each group). The intervention group showed significant improvements in speech intelligibility compared with the control group. This was evidenced by improvements from baseline (F1,30=34.35; P<.001), between-group differences (F1,30=6.18; P=.02), and notable time-by-group interactions (F1,30=6.91; P=.01). Regarding secondary outcomes, the intervention led to improvements in the percentage of correct consonants over time (F1,30=5.57; P=.03). In addition, significant reductions were noted in the severity of dysarthria in the intervention group over time (F1,30=21.18; P<.001), with a pronounced group effect (F1,30=5.52; P=.03) and time-by-group interaction (F1,30=5.29; P=.03). Regarding quality of life, significant improvements were observed as measured by the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire (F1,30=13.25; P<.001) and EQ-VAS (F1,30=7.74; P=.009) over time. The adherence rate to the smartphone-based app was 64%, with over half of the participants completing all the sessions. The usability of the app was rated high (system usability score 80.78). In addition, the intervention group reported increased self-efficacy in using the app compared with the control group (F1,30=10.81; P=.003). CONCLUSIONS: The smartphone-based speech therapy app significantly improved speech intelligibility, articulation, and quality of life in patients with poststroke dysarthria. These findings indicate that smartphone-based speech therapy can be a useful assistant device in the management of poststroke dysarthria, particularly in the acute and early subacute stroke stages. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05146765; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05146765.


Subject(s)
Dysarthria , Feasibility Studies , Smartphone , Speech Therapy , Stroke , Humans , Dysarthria/therapy , Dysarthria/etiology , Speech Therapy/methods , Male , Female , Pilot Projects , Middle Aged , Stroke/complications , Aged , Quality of Life , Stroke Rehabilitation/methods , Mobile Applications , Treatment Outcome
13.
Pract Neurol ; 24(4): 310-312, 2024 Jul 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38423756

ABSTRACT

Paroxysmal dysarthria ataxia syndrome presents with recurrent, brief, stereotyped events of dysarthria, limb clumsiness, unsteady gait and vertigo or dizziness that can occur in association with lesions in the midbrain. We describe a case of a woman presenting with paroxysmal dysarthria and ataxia secondary to a midbrain lesion, treated successfully with carbamazepine.


Subject(s)
Ataxia , Dysarthria , Humans , Female , Dysarthria/etiology , Ataxia/complications , Ataxia/etiology , Ataxia/drug therapy , Middle Aged , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Carbamazepine/therapeutic use
14.
Clin Rehabil ; 38(6): 802-810, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38374687

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To identify and agree on what outcome domains should be measured in research and clinical practice when working with stroke survivors who have dysarthria. DESIGN: Delphi process, two rounds of an online survey followed by two online consensus meetings. SETTING: UK and Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Stroke survivors with experience of dysarthria, speech and language therapists/pathologists working in stroke and communication researchers. METHODS: Initial list of outcome domains generated from existing literature and with our patient and public involvement group to develop the survey. Participants completed two rounds of this survey to rate importance. Outcomes were identified as 'in', 'unclear' or 'out' from the second survey. All participants were invited to two consensus meetings to discuss these results followed by voting to identify critically important outcome domains for a future Core Outcome Set. All outcomes were voted on in the consensus meetings and included if 70% of meeting participants voted 'yes' for critically important. RESULTS: In total, 148 surveys were fully completed, and 28 participants attended the consensus meetings. A core outcome set for dysarthria after stroke should include four outcome domains: (a) intelligibility of speech, (b) ability to participate in conversations, (c) living well with dysarthria, (d) skills and knowledge of communication partners (where relevant). CONCLUSIONS: We describe the consensus of 'what' speech outcomes after stroke are valued by all stakeholders including those with lived experience. We share these findings to encourage the measurement of these domains in clinical practice and research and for future research to identify 'how' best to measure these outcomes.


Subject(s)
Delphi Technique , Dysarthria , Stroke Rehabilitation , Stroke , Humans , Dysarthria/etiology , Dysarthria/rehabilitation , Stroke/complications , Female , Male , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Middle Aged , Australia , Consensus , Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , United Kingdom
15.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol ; 33(3): 1236-1253, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38416062

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were (a) to investigate adult listeners' perceptions of age and gender in typically developing children and children with dysarthria and (b) to identify predictors of their estimates among auditory-perceptual parameters and an acoustic measure of vocal pitch (F0). We aimed to evaluate the influence of dysarthria on the listeners' impressions of age and gender against the background of typical developmental processes. METHOD: In a listening experiment, adult listeners completed age and gender estimates of 144 typically developing children (3-9 years of age) and 25 children with dysarthria (5-9 years of age). The Bogenhausen Dysarthria Scales for Childhood Dysarthria (BoDyS-KiD) were applied to record speech samples and to complete auditory-perceptual judgments covering all speech subsystems. Furthermore, each child's mean F0 was determined from samples of four BoDyS-KiD sentences. RESULTS: Age estimates for the typically developing children showed a regression to the mean, whereas children with dysarthria were systematically underestimated in their age. The estimates of all children were predicted by developmental speech features; for the children with dysarthria, specific dysarthria symptoms had an additional effect. We found a significantly higher accuracy of gender attribution in the typically developing children than in the children with dysarthria. The prediction accuracy of the listeners' gender attribution in the preadolescent children by the included speech characteristics was limited. CONCLUSIONS: Children with dysarthria are more difficult to estimate for their age and gender than their typically developing peers. Dysarthria thus alters the auditory-perceptual impression of indexical speech features in children, which must be considered another facet of the communication disorder associated with childhood dysarthria.


Subject(s)
Dysarthria , Speech Acoustics , Speech Perception , Speech Production Measurement , Humans , Dysarthria/etiology , Dysarthria/diagnosis , Dysarthria/psychology , Female , Male , Child, Preschool , Child , Age Factors , Child Language , Sex Factors , Adult , Voice Quality , Judgment
16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38306019

ABSTRACT

Objective: Language dysfunction is one of the most common cognitive impairments in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Although discourse capacities are essential for daily functioning, verbal expressive language has not been widely investigated in ALS. The existing research available suggests that discourse impairments are prevalent. This study investigates verbal expressive language in people living with ALS (plwALS) in contrast to healthy controls (HC).Methods: 64 plwALS and 49 age, gender and education-matched healthy controls were ask to describe the Cookie Theft Picture Task. The recordings were analyzed for discourse productivity, discourse content, syntactic complexity, speech fluency and verb processing. We applied the Bayesian hypothesis-testing framework, incorporating the effects of dysarthria, cognitive impairment status (CIS), and premorbid crystalline verbal IQ.Results: Compared to HC, plwALS only showed a single impairment: speech dysfluency. Discourse productivity, discourse content, syntactic complexity and verb processing were not impaired. Cognition and dysarthria exceeded the influence of verbal IQ for total words spoken and content density. Cognition alone seemed to explain dysfluency. Body-agent verbs were produced at even higher rates than other verb types. For the remaining outcomes, verbal IQ was the most decisive factor.Conclusions: In contrast to existing research, our data demonstrates no discernible impairment in verbal expressive language in ALS. What our findings show to be decisive is accounting for the influence of dysarthria, cognitive impairment status, and verbal IQ as variables on spontaneous verbal expressive language. Minor impairments in verbal expressive language appear to be influenced to a greater degree by executive dysfunctioning and dysarthria than by language impairment.


Subject(s)
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis , Communication Disorders , Language Disorders , Humans , Bayes Theorem , Dysarthria/etiology , Language , Neuropsychological Tests
18.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol ; 33(2): 1069-1097, 2024 Mar 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38232176

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This systematic review represents an update to previous reviews of the literature addressing behavioral management of respiratory/phonatory dysfunction in individuals with dysarthria due to neurodegenerative disease. METHOD: Multiple electronic database searches and hand searches of prominent speech-language pathology journals were conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses standards. RESULTS: The search yielded 1,525 articles, from which 88 met inclusion criteria and were reviewed by two blinded co-investigators. A large range of therapeutic approaches have been added to the evidence base since the last review, including expiratory muscle strength training, singing, and computer- and device-driven programs, as well as a variety of treatment modalities, including teletherapy. Evidence for treatment in several different population groups-including cerebellar ataxia, myotonic dystrophy, autosomal recessive spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay, Huntington's disease, multiple system atrophy, and Lewy body dementia-were added to the current review. Synthesis of evidence quality provided strong evidence in support of only one behavioral intervention: Lee Silverman Voice Treatment Program (LSVT LOUD) in people with Parkinson's disease. No other treatment approach or population included in this review demonstrated more than limited evidence, reflecting that these approaches/populations require urgent further examination. CONCLUSION: Suggestions about where future research efforts could be significantly strengthened and how clinicians can apply research findings to their practice are provided. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.24964473.


Subject(s)
Neurodegenerative Diseases , Parkinson Disease , Humans , Neurodegenerative Diseases/complications , Neurodegenerative Diseases/therapy , Dysarthria/diagnosis , Dysarthria/etiology , Dysarthria/therapy , Speech Therapy , Voice Training , Parkinson Disease/complications
19.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol ; 33(1): 96-116, 2024 Jan 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37889201

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Sex differences are apparent in the prevalence and the clinical presentation of Parkinson's disease (PD), but their effects on speech have been less studied. METHOD: Speech acoustics of persons with (34 females and 34 males) and without (age- and sex-matched) PD were examined, assessing the effects of PD diagnosis and sex on ratings of dysarthria severity and acoustic measures of phonation (fundamental frequency standard deviation, smoothed cepstral peak prominence), speech rate (net syllables per second, percent pause ratio), and articulation (articulatory-acoustic vowel space, release burst precision). RESULTS: Most measures were affected by PD (dysarthria severity, fundamental frequency standard deviation) and sex (smoothed cepstral peak prominence, net syllables per second, percent pause ratio, articulatory-acoustic vowel space), but without interactions between them. Release burst precision was differentially affected by sex in PD. Relative to those without PD, persons with PD produced fewer plosives with a single burst: females more frequently produced multiple bursts, whereas males more frequently produced no burst at all. CONCLUSIONS: Most metrics did not indicate that speech production is differentially affected by sex in PD. Sex was, however, associated with disparate effects on release burst precision in PD, which deserves further study. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.24388666.


Subject(s)
Parkinson Disease , Speech , Humans , Male , Female , Parkinson Disease/complications , Parkinson Disease/diagnosis , Dysarthria/etiology , Dysarthria/complications , Sex Characteristics , Speech Acoustics , Speech Production Measurement
20.
J Neural Transm (Vienna) ; 131(2): 181-187, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37943390

ABSTRACT

Hypokinetic dysarthria (HD) is a difficult-to-treat symptom affecting quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Levodopa may partially alleviate some symptoms of HD in PD, but the neural correlates of these effects are not fully understood. The aim of our study was to identify neural mechanisms by which levodopa affects articulation and prosody in patients with PD. Altogether 20 PD patients participated in a task fMRI study (overt sentence reading). Using a single dose of levodopa after an overnight withdrawal of dopaminergic medication, levodopa-induced BOLD signal changes within the articulatory pathway (in regions of interest; ROIs) were studied. We also correlated levodopa-induced BOLD signal changes with the changes in acoustic parameters of speech. We observed no significant changes in acoustic parameters due to acute levodopa administration. After levodopa administration as compared to the OFF dopaminergic condition, patients showed task-induced BOLD signal decreases in the left ventral thalamus (p = 0.0033). The changes in thalamic activation were associated with changes in pitch variation (R = 0.67, p = 0.006), while the changes in caudate nucleus activation were related to changes in the second formant variability which evaluates precise articulation (R = 0.70, p = 0.003). The results are in line with the notion that levodopa does not have a major impact on HD in PD, but it may induce neural changes within the basal ganglia circuitries that are related to changes in speech prosody and articulation.


Subject(s)
Levodopa , Parkinson Disease , Humans , Levodopa/adverse effects , Parkinson Disease/complications , Parkinson Disease/diagnostic imaging , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , Speech/physiology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Quality of Life , Speech Disorders/diagnostic imaging , Speech Disorders/etiology , Dysarthria/etiology , Dysarthria/complications , Antiparkinson Agents/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL