ABSTRACT
Amodiaquine (AQ) is a commonly used antimalarial drug, and N-desethyl-AQ (N-DEAQ) is an active metabolite of AQ. Given the significance of drug quality in the management of malaria cases, this study aims to develop antibody-based assays for the detection and quantitation of AQ without the need for sophisticated equipment. Two monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against AQ, designated as JUN7 and TE7, were selected, which showed 72.7% and 9.5% cross-reactivity to N-DEAQ, respectively. These mAbs showed <0.1% cross-reactivity to other commonly used antimalarial drugs. An indirect competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (icELISA) based on JUN7 showed a 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) of 0.16 ng/mL and a working range of 0.06-0.46 ng/mL. A lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) based on JUN7 was also developed with a working range of 2.58-30.86 ng/mL. The icELISA and LFIA were applied for the quantification of AQ in commercial drugs, and the results were comparable to those determined using high-performance liquid chromatography. In addition, a combination dipstick for simultaneous, qualitative analysis of AQ and artesunate was developed. All immunoassays based on JUN7 can be applied for quality control of AQ-containing artemisinin-based combination therapies. As TE7 showed low cross-reactivity to N-DEAQ, an icELISA based on TE7 was developed with an IC50 of 0.38 ng/mL and a working range of 0.14-1.67 ng/mL. The TE7 icELISA was applied for the study of pharmacokinetics of AQ in rat serum after intragastric administration, and the results were consistent with those of previous studies.
Subject(s)
Amodiaquine/blood , Antimalarials/blood , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Amodiaquine/analysis , Animals , Antibodies, Immobilized/chemistry , Antibodies, Monoclonal/chemistry , Antimalarials/analysis , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/economics , Female , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Rats , Time FactorsABSTRACT
To monitor the levels of protecting antibodies raised in the population in response to infection and/or to immunization with SARS-CoV-2, we need a technique that allows high throughput and low-cost quantitative analysis of human IgG antibodies reactive against viral antigens. Here we describe an ultra-fast, high throughput and inexpensive assay to detect SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion in humans. The assay is based on Ni2+ magnetic particles coated with His tagged SARS-CoV-2 antigens. A simple and inexpensive 96 well plate magnetic extraction/homogenization process is described which allows the simultaneous analysis of 96 samples and delivers results in 7 min with high accuracy.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , COVID-19 Serological Testing/methods , COVID-19/diagnosis , Immunoglobulin G/blood , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Antigens, Viral/blood , Antigens, Viral/immunology , COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19 Serological Testing/economics , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/economics , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Magnets/chemistry , Nickel/chemistry , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Sensitivity and Specificity , Seroconversion , Time FactorsABSTRACT
Immune checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) are effective immunno-therapeutic agents for cancer. Rapid and sensitive determination of the blocking activity of ICIs is important for ICIs development and immunological research. Among various immune checkpoint (IC) binding assays, cell-based binding assays are widely regarded, and the functional ELISA is a convenient alternative. However, these methodologies are limited by time-consuming preparation of cell lines stably expressing IC molecules, or long turnaround time with high cost. In this study, two magnetic bead based binding assays were developed to evaluate activity of ICIs, which was determined by a soluble ligand/bead immobilized receptor based binding assay (sL/bR binding assay) that assessed efficacy to block binding of one soluble IC ligand on its cognate receptor immobilized beads, or by a soluble receptor/bead immobilized ligand based binding assay (sR/bL binding assay) that assessed efficacy to block binding of soluble IC receptor on its cognate ligand immobilized beads. Half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values of ICIs were calculated to determine ICIs activity. The sL/bR binding assay accurately determined the activity of two TIGIT blocking antibodies, since the relative blocking activity of two TIGIT antibodies determined by the sL/bR binding assay established in this study and that by the cell based binding assay were almost identical. In contrast, the sR/bL binding assay showed significantly improved sensitivity to determine activity of two PD-1 blocking antibodies than the sL/bR binding assay that was tested in this study and previous reports. Moreover, both amount of the used recombinant protein of ICI receptor/ligand and turnaround time of the two binding assays were more than 10 times less than those of the functional ELISA. These data indicate that the two magnetic bead based binding assays are sensitive, rapid and cost-effective methods to determine blocking activity of ICIs.
Subject(s)
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/pharmacology , Immunoassay/economics , Nivolumab/pharmacology , Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/antagonists & inhibitors , Receptors, Immunologic/antagonists & inhibitors , Animals , Antibodies, Monoclonal/immunology , Antibody Specificity , CHO Cells , Cell Line, Tumor , Cost Savings , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Cricetulus , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/economics , Flow Cytometry/economics , HEK293 Cells , Humans , Mice , Predictive Value of Tests , Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/immunology , Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/metabolism , Receptors, Immunologic/immunology , Receptors, Immunologic/metabolism , Reproducibility of Results , Time Factors , WorkflowABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Management of patients with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) can lead to significant costs. Reported cost-saving initiatives have focused on minimizing inappropriate testing in low-risk patients and optimizing alternative anticoagulant selection. We sought to further investigate how utilizing various HIT laboratory testing models would impact total cost of testing and alternative anticoagulant use. METHODS: Utilizing a retrospective cohort of adult patients tested for HIT over three years within our institution, we evaluated how utilization of four distinct laboratory models impacted total number of HIT test combinations completed, time to HIT testing finalization, percentage of patients discharged from the hospital prior to HIT testing finalization, total alternative anticoagulant days, and total anticipated major bleed events. Additionally, we calculated cost of laboratory testing and alternative anticoagulant associated with each model. RESULTS: A total of 482 patients were included in our cohort. A laboratory testing model that utilized an in-house platelet factor 4 (PF4)-heparin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) completed three days weekly, and reflex serotonin release assay (SRA) with a five-day turnaround resulted in the shortest mean time to HIT testing finalization, lowest percentage of patients discharged prior to HIT testing finalization, and lowest total alternative anticoagulant days. CONCLUSIONS: Institutions should evaluate current HIT laboratory testing practices and assess for opportunities for optimization. Testing models utilizing a PF4-heparin antibody ELISA with a reflex SRA for positive results may improve testing metrics and lead to lower utilization of alternative anticoagulants.
Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Blood Coagulation Tests/economics , Cost Savings , Costs and Cost Analysis , Heparin/adverse effects , Thrombocytopenia/diagnosis , Thrombocytopenia/etiology , Blood Coagulation , Blood Coagulation Tests/methods , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Disease Management , Disease Susceptibility , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/economics , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Humans , Thrombocytopenia/blood , Thrombocytopenia/therapyABSTRACT
SARS-CoV-2 emerged in late 2019 and has since spread around the world, causing a pandemic of the respiratory disease COVID-19. Detecting antibodies against the virus is an essential tool for tracking infections and developing vaccines. Such tests, primarily utilizing the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) principle, can be either qualitative (reporting positive/negative results) or quantitative (reporting a value representing the quantity of specific antibodies). Quantitation is vital for determining stability or decline of antibody titers in convalescence, efficacy of different vaccination regimens, and detection of asymptomatic infections. Quantitation typically requires two-step ELISA testing, in which samples are first screened in a qualitative assay and positive samples are subsequently analyzed as a dilution series. To overcome the throughput limitations of this approach, we developed a simpler and faster system that is highly automatable and achieves quantitation in a single-dilution screening format with sensitivity and specificity comparable to those of ELISA.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , COVID-19/blood , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Animals , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19 Serological Testing/economics , COVID-19 Serological Testing/methods , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/economics , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Immunoglobulin M/blood , Immunoglobulin M/immunology , Mice , SARS-CoV-2/immunologyABSTRACT
The control of brucellosis across sub-Saharan Africa is hampered by the lack of standardized testing and the use of tests with poor performance. This study evaluated the performance and costs of serological assays for human brucellosis in a pastoralist community in northern Tanzania. Serum collected from 218 febrile hospital patients was used to evaluate the performance of seven index tests, selected based on international recommendation or current use. We evaluated the Rose Bengal test (RBT) using two protocols, four commercial agglutination tests and a competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, Youden's index, diagnostic accuracy, and per-sample cost of each index test were estimated. The diagnostic accuracy estimates ranged from 95.9 to 97.7% for the RBT, 55.0 to 72.0% for the commercial plate tests, and 89.4% for the cELISA. The per-sample cost range was $0.69-$0.79 for the RBT, $1.03-$1.14 for the commercial plate tests, and $2.51 for the cELISA. The widely used commercial plate tests performed poorly and cost more than the RBT. These findings provide evidence for the public health value of discontinuing the use of commercial agglutination tests for human brucellosis in Tanzania.
Subject(s)
Brucellosis/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Agglutination Tests/economics , Brucella/isolation & purification , Brucellosis/blood , Brucellosis/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/economics , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Sensitivity and Specificity , Serologic Tests/economics , Tanzania/epidemiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The widespread popularity of porcine circovirus type 2(PCV2) has seriously affected the healthy development of the pig industry and caused huge economic losses worldwide. A rapid and reliable method is required for epidemiological investigation and evaluating the effect of immunization. However, the current methods for PCV2 antibody detection are time-consuming or very expensive and rarely meet the requirements for clinical application. we have constructed the platform for expressing the nanobody(Nb)horseradish peroxidase(HRP) fusion protein as an ultrasensitive probe to detect antibodies against the Newcastle disease virus(NDV), previously. In the present work, an Nb-HRP fusion protein-based competitive ELISA(cELISA) for rapid and simple detection antibodies against PCV2 was developed using this platform to detect anti-PCV2 antibodies in clinical porcine serum. RESULTS: Using phage display technology, 19 anti-PCV2-Cap protein nanobodies were screened from a PCV2-Cap protein immunized Bactrian camel. With the platform, the PCV2-Nb15HRP fusion protein was then produced and used as a sensitive reagent for developing a cELISA to detect antiPCV2 antibodies. The cutoff value of the cELISA is 20.72 %. Three hundreds and sixty porcine serum samples were tested by both newly developed cELISA and commercial kits. The sensitivity and specificity were 99.68 % and 95.92 %, respectively. The coincidence rate of the two methods was 99.17 %. When detecting 620 clinical porcine serum samples, a good consistent (kappa value = 0.954) was found between the results of the cELISA and those of commercial kits. CONCLUSIONS: In brief, the newly developed cELISA based PCV2-Nb15HRP fusion protein is a rapid, low-cost, reliable and useful nanobody-based tool for the serological evaluation of current PCV2 vaccine efficacy and the indirect diagnosis of PCV2 infection.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Circoviridae Infections/veterinary , Circovirus/immunology , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Swine Diseases/immunology , Animals , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Camelus/immunology , Circoviridae Infections/blood , Circoviridae Infections/diagnosis , Circoviridae Infections/immunology , Circovirus/isolation & purification , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/economics , Horseradish Peroxidase/immunology , Immunization , Male , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/immunology , Sensitivity and Specificity , Single-Domain Antibodies/immunology , Swine/blood , Swine/immunology , Swine/virology , Swine Diseases/blood , Swine Diseases/diagnosis , Swine Diseases/virology , Time FactorsABSTRACT
Laboratory diagnosis of the COVID-19 relies on RT-PCR to amplify specific fragments of SARS-CoV-2 genome. However, serological tests are required to determine the immune response elicited after infection. Here, we analyzed convalescent sera collected from positive individuals by RT-PCR to SARS-CoV-2 (n = 78), Zika (n = 20), dengue (n = 20), chikungunya (n = 54), intestinal parasites (n = 11), and HIV (n = 1), from different areas of Ecuador, with an in-house ELISA using a SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain recombinant (rRBD) antigen to detect IgG antibodies elicited by SARS-CoV-2 infection. Of the 78 samples positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR, 73 showed high absorbance value compared with the cutoff and five were negative. All tested sera from other infections showed no reactivity. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 93.6%, 100%, 100%, and 95.4%, respectively. This in-house anti-IgG rRBD ELISA offers an economic and simple alternative to determine IgG immune responses after SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 Serological Testing/methods , COVID-19/diagnosis , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/blood , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19 Serological Testing/economics , Ecuador/epidemiology , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/economics , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Protein Binding , Protein Domains , Recombinant Proteins/immunology , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/chemistryABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Amyloid-ß42 (Aß42) is associated with plaque formation in the brain of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Studies have suggested the potential utility of plasma Aß42 levels in the diagnosis, and in longitudinal study of AD pathology. Conventional ELISAs are used to measure Aß42 levels in plasma but are not sensitive enough to quantitate low levels. Although ultrasensitive assays like single molecule array or immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry have been developed to quantitate plasma Aß42 levels, the high cost of instruments and reagents limit their use. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that a sensitive and cost-effective chemiluminescence (CL) immunoassay could be developed to detect low Aß42 levels in human plasma. METHODS: We developed a sandwich ELISA using high affinity rabbit monoclonal antibody specific to Aß42. The sensitivity of the assay was increased using CL substrate to quantitate low levels of Aß42 in plasma. We examined the levels in plasma from 13 AD, 25 Down syndrome (DS), and 50 elderly controls. RESULTS: The measurement range of the assay was 0.25 to 500âpg/ml. The limit of detection was 1âpg/ml. All AD, DS, and 45 of 50 control plasma showed measurable Aß42 levels. CONCLUSION: This assay detects low levels of Aß42 in plasma and does not need any expensive equipment or reagents. It offers a preferred alternative to ultrasensitive assays. Since the antibodies, peptide, and substrate are commercially available, the assay is well suited for academic or diagnostic laboratories, and has a potential for the diagnosis of AD or in clinical trials.
Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease/blood , Amyloid beta-Peptides/blood , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Luminescent Measurements/methods , Peptide Fragments/blood , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Case-Control Studies , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Down Syndrome/blood , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/economics , Female , Humans , Luminescent Measurements/economics , Male , Middle Aged , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
Timely and accurate laboratory testing is essential for managing the global COVID-19 pandemic. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction remains the gold-standard for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis, but several practical issues limit the test's use. Immunoassays have been indicated as an alternative for individual and mass testing. OBJECTIVES: To access the performance of 12 serological tests for COVID-19 diagnosis. METHODS: We conducted a blind evaluation of six lateral-flow immunoassays (LFIAs) and six enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) commercially available in Brazil for detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. RESULTS: Considering patients with seven or more days of symptoms, the sensitivity ranged from 59.5% to 83.1% for LFIAs and from 50.7% to 92.6% for ELISAs. For both methods, the sensitivity increased with clinical severity and days of symptoms. The agreement among LFIAs performed with digital blood and serum was moderate. Specificity was, in general, higher for LFIAs than for ELISAs. Infectious diseases prevalent in the tropics, such as HIV, leishmaniasis, arboviruses, and malaria, represent conditions with the potential to cause false-positive results with these tests, which significantly compromises their specificity. CONCLUSION: The performance of immunoassays was only moderate, affected by the duration and clinical severity of the disease. Absence of discriminatory power between IgM/IgA and IgG has also been demonstrated, which prevents the use of acute-phase antibodies for decisions on social isolation.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Immunoassay/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Brazil , COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/virology , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/economics , Female , Humans , Immunoassay/economics , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Sensitivity and Specificity , Young AdultABSTRACT
Convalescent serum with a high abundance of neutralization IgG is a promising therapeutic agent for rescuing COVID-19 patients in the critical stage. Knowing the concentration of SARS-CoV-2 S1-specific IgG is crucial in selecting appropriate convalescent serum donors. Here, we present a portable microfluidic ELISA technology for rapid (15 min), quantitative, and sensitive detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1 IgG in human serum with only 8 µL sample volume. We first identified a humanized monoclonal IgG that has a high binding affinity and a relatively high specificity towards SARS-CoV-2 S1 protein, which can subsequently serve as the calibration standard of anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1 IgG in serological analyses. We then measured the abundance of anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1 IgG in 16 convalescent COVID-19 patients. Due to the availability of the calibration standard and the large dynamic range of our assay, we were able to identify "qualified donors" for convalescent serum therapy with only one fixed dilution factor (200 ×). Finally, we demonstrated that our technology can sensitively detect SARS-CoV-2 antigens (S1 and N proteins) with pg/mL level sensitivities in 40 min. Overall, our technology can greatly facilitate rapid, sensitive, and quantitative analysis of COVID-19 related markers for therapeutic, diagnostic, epidemiologic, and prognostic purposes.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , Betacoronavirus/immunology , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/instrumentation , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Microfluidic Analytical Techniques/instrumentation , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Adolescent , Adult , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Antigens, Viral/blood , Antigens, Viral/immunology , Biosensing Techniques/economics , Biosensing Techniques/instrumentation , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/economics , Equipment Design , Humans , Immunization, Passive , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Limit of Detection , Luminescent Measurements/economics , Luminescent Measurements/instrumentation , Microfluidic Analytical Techniques/economics , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , SARS-CoV-2 , Time Factors , Young Adult , COVID-19 SerotherapyABSTRACT
Shrimps cause a significant part of crustacea-related allergies. It is used in processed foods, including fermented Korean foods, such as kimchi. Even low amounts of shrimp allergens can provoke reactions in consumers allergic to shrimp. Accurate food labeling is the most effective means of preventing the consumption of allergenic ingredients. To validate labeling compliance and minimize the risk of cross-contaminations, the effectiveness of methodologies used for the detection of allergens in foods should be compared. Here, seven commercial kits, based on quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), were assessed for their ability to detect the presence of shrimp allergens in food. Our results showed that SureFood real-time PCR kit and Ridascreen ELISA kit had the highest recovery, whereas five other kits underperformed in the determination of allergen content of kimchi and its ingredients. The variation in recovery among the kits depended on the limit of detection and reactivity to the shrimp allergens, tropomyosin, and sarcoplasmic calcium-binding protein. PRACTICAL APPLICATION: This research confirms the performance of commercial kits to detect the presence of shrimp allergens in kimchi, and demonstrates that the sensitivity of these kits depends on reactivity to the specific shrimp allergenic proteins. These results can be used to food allergy labeling and can be applied by the food industry to develop allergen test kits for fermented foods with improved performance.
Subject(s)
Allergens/analysis , Crustacea/genetics , DNA/genetics , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Fermented Foods/analysis , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Shellfish Hypersensitivity/prevention & control , Vegetables/chemistry , Allergens/genetics , Allergens/immunology , Animals , Crustacea/chemistry , Crustacea/immunology , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/economics , Food Labeling , Polymerase Chain Reaction/economics , Shellfish Hypersensitivity/immunology , Vegetables/immunologyABSTRACT
Bisphenol A (BPA) is classified as an endocrine disruptor (ED) and it can interact with variety of hormone receptors leading to hormonal disruption and increased risk of various adverse health effects. Reducing human exposure to BPA is one of the main challenges of public health, as it is constantly present in daily life. A low-cost and commonly applied method to enable determination of BPA in the patient's body has yet to be developed. Currently available techniques are expensive, time-consuming, and require access to highly equipped analytical chemistry laboratories. Here we describe a fast and cheap engineered lateral flow assay of our design, to detect of BPA in urine samples. The technology not only provides an opportunity to perform rapid medical diagnostics without the need for an access to the central laboratory but also a means for self-diagnosis by the patient. The addition of ß-glucuronidase improves the sensitivity of detection as it releases the free BPA from glucuronide complexes in urine. This invention may become a demonstrated analytical means for lowering human exposure to BPA and probably also to other EDs and consequently, may be useful in decrease of the risk for several lifestyle diseases.
Subject(s)
Antibodies/chemistry , Benzhydryl Compounds/chemistry , Benzhydryl Compounds/urine , Endocrine Disruptors/chemistry , Endocrine Disruptors/urine , Phenols/chemistry , Phenols/urine , Adolescent , Adsorption , Adult , Antibodies/immunology , Benzhydryl Compounds/immunology , Child , Child, Preschool , Chromatography, Liquid , Collodion/chemistry , Endocrine Disruptors/immunology , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/economics , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Female , Glucuronidase/chemistry , Glucuronides/chemistry , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Male , Membranes, Artificial , Phenols/immunology , Public Health/methods , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tandem Mass Spectrometry , Young AdultABSTRACT
Resumen El objetivo del presente trabajo fue el desarrollo de dos enzimoinmunoensayos competitivos (EIC) para la detección de trazas de soja y de leche en productos libres de gluten. Como anticuerpos primarios se utilizaron antisueros policlonales de conejo específicos contra proteínas de soja o de leche. Se determinaron las concentraciones óptimas de antígenos a inmovilizar en la placa y las concentraciones de anticuerpos primarios a utilizar en la competencia. Las curvas de calibración se ajustaron utilizando concentraciones crecientes de un extracto de producto de soja y de un extracto de leche descremada en polvo. El producto de soja y la leche descremada se extrajeron con buffer Tris-HCl 0,0625 M con dodecilsulfato de sodio al 3% y sulfito de sodio 0,1 M al 2%. Se evaluaron los parámetros de validación: linealidad, límites de detección y de cuantificación, recuperación y precisión en el día y entre días, los cuales resultaron adecuados. Se analizaron 9 productos libres de gluten con los EIC desarrollados y con kits de ELISA comerciales. Ambos EIC se comportaron de manera similar con respecto a los kits comerciales. Los EIC permitieron confirmar la presencia de leche en las muestras que la declaraban. En algunas muestras que no declaraban ni leche ni soja, ambos EIC detectaron su presencia (resultados confirmados con los kits comerciales). Los EIC desarrollados poseen menor costo que los kits y, por lo tanto, éstos podrían utilizarse como métodos de screening. Cuando esta metodología resulte negativa, debe confirmarse con un método más sensible (comercial) para garantizar la ausencia de proteínas de soja o de leche.
Abstract The aim of this study was to develop two competitive enzyme immunoassays (CEI) to detect the presence of traces of soy and milk in gluten-free products. Specific rabbit polyclonal antiserums against soy protein and other against elemilk protein were used as primary antibodies. Optimal antigen concentrations to be immobilized on the plate and primary antibody concentrations to be used in competition were determined. The calibration curves were fitted using increasing concentrations of an extract of soy product and of defatted milk powder. The soy product and the defatted milk were extracted with Tris-HCl buffer 0,0625 M with 3% sodium dodecyl sulfate and 2% sodium sulfite 0.1 M. The validation parameters were evaluated: linearity, limit of detection and quantification, recovery and precision on the day and in between days. They were appropriate. Nine commercial samples of gluten-free products were analyzed with these developed CEI and commercial ELISA kits. It was observed that both CEI behaved similarly with respect to the commercial kits. The enzyme immunoassays confirmed the presence of milk in samples that declared it. In some samples that did not declare the presence of milk or soy, both enzyme immunoassays detected their presence -these results were confirmed using commercial kits. The developed CEI have a lower cost than the commercial kits, so these could be used as screening methods. When this methodology is negative, it should be confirmed with a more sensitive (commercial) method to ensure the absence of soy or milk protein.
Resumo O objetivo do presente trabalho foi o desenvolvimento de dois enzimoimunoensaios competitivos (EIC), para a detecção de vestígios de soja e leite em produtos livres de glúten. Antissoros policlonais de coelho específicos contra proteínas de soja ou de leite foram utilizados como anticorpos primários. Foram determinadas as concentrações ótimas de antígenos a serem imobilizados na placa e as concentrações de anticorpos primários a serem utilizadas na competição. As curvas de calibração foram ajustadas usando concentrações crescentes de um extrato de produto de soja e de um extrato de leite em pó desnatado. O produto de soja e o leite desnatado foram extraídos com tampão Tris-HCl 0,0625 M com dodecil sulfato de sódio a 3% e sulfito de sódio 0,1 M a 2%. Os parâmetros de validação foram avaliados: linearidade, limite de detecção e quantificação, recuperação e precisão no dia e entre os dias, os quais resultaram adequados. Nove produtos livres de glúten foram analisados com os EIC desenvolvidos e com kits de ELISA comerciais. Os dois EICs se comportaram de maneira semelhante em relação aos kits comerciais. Os EIC permitiram confirmar a presença de leite nas amostras que o declararam. Em algumas amostras que declaravam nem leite nem soja, ambos os EIC detectaram sua presença (resultados confirmados usando kits comerciais). Os EIC desenvolvidos têm um custo menor que os kits, portanto, eles poderiam ser utilizados como métodos de triagem. Quando esta metodologia é negativa, deve ser confirmada com um método mais sensível (comercial) para garantir a ausência de proteínasda soja ou do leite.
Subject(s)
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Soybean Proteins/analysis , Diet, Gluten-Free , Food Analysis/methods , Milk Proteins/analysis , Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/economics , Costs and Cost Analysis , Sodium Sulfite , Food Technology/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Fish is a major food and allergen source, requiring safety declarations on packages. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) are often used to ensure that the product meets the required standards with regard to the presence of allergens. Over 1000 different fish species are traded and consumed worldwide, and they are increasingly provided by aquaculture. Up to 3% of the general population is at risk of sometimes fatal allergic reactions to fish, requiring strict avoidance of this commodity. The aim of this study is to evaluate the capacity of three commercially available ELISA tests to detect a wide variety of bony and cartilaginous fish and their products, which is essential to ensure reliable and safe food labeling. RESULTS: The detection rates for 57 bony fish ranged from 26% to 61%. Common European and North American species, including carp, cod, and salmon species, demonstrated a higher detection rate than those from the Asia-Pacific region, including pangasius and several mackerel and tuna species. Among the 17 canned bony fish products, only 65% to 86% were detected, with tuna showing the lowest rate. None of the cartilaginous fish (n = 9), other vertebrates (n = 8), or shellfish (n = 5) were detected. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that three commercial fish ELISA kits had a limited capacity to detect fish and their products. The complexity of fish as a protein source that is increasingly utilized means that there is an urgent need for improved detection methods. This is crucial for the food industry to provide safe seafood products and comply with international legislation. © 2020 Society of Chemical Industry.
Subject(s)
Allergens/analysis , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Fish Proteins/analysis , Fishes/immunology , Allergens/immunology , Animals , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/economics , Fish Products/analysis , Fish Proteins/immunology , Fishes/classification , Seafood/analysisABSTRACT
In Hungary, between February 2017 and July 2019, 70 confirmed measles cases were reported, raising questions about the adequacy of population-level immunity. Although the assumed vaccination coverage is ≥99%, in a recent study, we detected potential gaps in the anti-measles humoral immunity. In Hungary, according to a decree by the Ministry of Public Welfare, beginning from 2021, the healthcare provider should conduct a serosurvey of anti-measles protection levels of healthcare professionals. To facilitate the compliance with this requirement, we developed a quick 'three-in-one' or 'triple' MMR (measles, mumps and rubella) indirect ELISA (IgG); an assay format that is currently not available commercially. High throughput applicability of the 'three-in-one' ELISA was verified using 1736 sera from routine laboratory residual samples, using an automated platform (Siemens BEP 2000 Advance). Assay verification was performed by comparing the full antigen repertoire-based 'target' assay with in-house 'control' assays using recombinant viral antigen coatings, and by validated commercially available kits. Indirect immunofluorescence was used as an independent reference method. Data were analysed using OriginLab, IBM SPSS, RStudio and MedCalc. In case of measles, we combined our current results with previously published data (Ntotal measles = 3523). Evaluation of anti-mumps and anti-rubella humoral antibody levels was based on the measurement of 1736 samples. The lowest anti-measles seropositivity (79.3%) was detected in sera of individuals vaccinated between 1978 and 1987. Considering the antigen-specific seropositivity ratios of all samples measured, anti-measles, -mumps and -rubella IgG antibody titres were adequate in 89.84%, 91.82% and 92.28%, respectively. Based on the virus-specific herd immunity threshold (HIT) values (HITMeasles = 92-95%, HITMumps = 75-86%, HITRubella = 83-86), it can be stated that regarding anti-measles immunity, certain age clusters of the population may have inadequate levels of humoral immunity. Despite the potential gaps in herd immunity, the use of MMR vaccine remains an effective and low-cost approach for the prevention of measles, mumps and rubella infections.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/economics , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Immunity, Humoral , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/immunology , Adolescent , Automation, Laboratory/economics , Automation, Laboratory/methods , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Hungary , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
Prompt diagnostic evaluation of suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is critical for guiding initial patient management. We assessed the performance of 3 immunoassays detecting anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin antibodies, derived a diagnostic algorithm with a short analytical turnaround time (TAT), and prospectively validated the algorithm. Plasma samples were analyzed by Zymutest-HIA-IgG, HemosIL-AcuStar-HIT-IgG, and ID-H/PF4-PaGIA in retrospective (n = 221) and prospective (n = 305) derivation cohorts. We calculated likelihood ratios of result intervals and cutoff values with 100% negative (NPV) and positive (PPV) predictive values for a positive gold standard functional assay (heparin-induced platelet activation [HIPA]). A diagnostic algorithm was established based on the Bayesian combination of pretest probability and likelihood ratios of first- and second-line immunoassays. Cutoffs with 100% PPV for positive HIPA were >3.0 U/mL (HemosIL-AcuStar-HIT-IgG) and titer ≥16 (ID-H/PF4-PaGIA); cutoffs with 100% NPV were <0.13 U/mL and ≤1, respectively. During the prospective validation of the derived algorithm (n = 687), HemosIL-AcuStar-HIT-IgG was used as unique testing in 566 (82.4%) of 687 cases (analytical TAT, 30 minutes). In 121 (17.6%) of 687 unresolved cases, ID-H/PF4-PaGIA was used as second-line testing (additional TAT, 30 minutes). The algorithm accurately predicted HIT in 51 (7.4%) of 687 patients and excluded it in 604 (87.9%) of 687 patients, leaving only 20 (2.9%) cases unresolved. We also identified 12 (1.7%) of 687 positive predictions not confirmed by HIPA: 10 patients with probable HIT despite negative HIPA and 2 possible false-positive algorithm predictions. The combination of pretest probability with first- and second-line immunoassays for anti-PF4/heparin antibodies is accurate for ruling in or out HIT in ≥95% of cases within 60 minutes. This diagnostic approach improves initial management of patients with suspected HIT.
Subject(s)
Antibodies/blood , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Heparin/adverse effects , Thrombocytopenia/chemically induced , Thrombocytopenia/diagnosis , Aged , Antibodies/immunology , Anticoagulants/immunology , Bayes Theorem , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/economics , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Female , Heparin/immunology , Humans , Immunoassay/economics , Immunoassay/methods , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Male , Platelet Factor 4/immunology , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Thrombocytopenia/blood , Time FactorsABSTRACT
We developed a two-step ELISA to determine the immunoreactive fraction of monoclonal antibodies in conditions of antigen excess. An antibody aliquot at limiting dilution was incubated in wells coated with increasing amounts of antigen up to concentrations that bind 100% of antibody. At equilibrium, a supernatant aliquot was transferred to a second plate coated with excess of antiglobulin, and the captured antibody was incubated with peroxidase-conjugated anti-IgG. Antibody was quantitated from the enzyme velocity gradient in a kinetic ELISA, and the immunoreactive fraction calculated as (1 - gradienti/gradientT) x 100, where i and T are the gradients for the free and total antibody fractions. For four distinct monoclonal antibodies (anti-diphtheria toxoid, -cholera toxin, -bovine serum albumin (BSA), and -trinitrophenyl-BSA), measurement of inter-assay variability yielded values ranging from 3.1 to 7.4 (% coefficient of variation), which supports method repeatability. This ELISA is simple, precise, and applicable to mono- and polyclonal antibodies.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/analysis , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Animals , Antibodies, Monoclonal/immunology , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/economics , Humans , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
The ability to separate, identify, and quantify proteins from complex mixtures are key foundational methods across biochemistry teaching and research. In particular, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is an important technique that is used to measure antigen concentrations in both industry and academia. There are four categories of ELISA, direct, indirect, competitive, and sandwich, each with their own applications. Sandwich ELISAs are used to determine antigen concentrations from complex mixtures of protein, such as a cell lysates, and are regularly used as medical diagnostics to diagnose illness and diseases ranging from hepatitis to celiac disease. One major problem with teaching the sandwich ELISA technique to students is the prohibitive cost due to the need to coat a 96-well plate with a capture antibody. One solution to this problem would be to significantly reduce the role of each student in the lab, but this does not adequately prepare students to perform the procedure in a research or industry lab. Instead, this laboratory exercise teaches students the procedural knowledge needed to perform a direct sandwich ELISA, but uses a simulated experience performed within a wet-lab environment. The presented scenario is the analysis of phosphorylated proteins within a synthetic signaling pathway, but because the lab uses simulated samples, it can be tailored to different topics and educational aims. The procedure is 10- to 26-fold less expensive per student to deploy than an authentic sandwich ELISA. Students in the course report that the ELISA lab significantly strengthened the connection between theory and practice. © 2019 International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 48(1):67-73, 2020.
Subject(s)
Celiac Disease/diagnosis , Cell Engineering , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/economics , Hepatitis/diagnosis , Signal Transduction , Humans , StudentsABSTRACT
This Letter describes a new rapid and sensitive immunosensing device using the pore space of a porous membrane as the reaction space. A track-etched membrane with uniform cylindrical pores is used as the base substrate of this device. The capture antibodies are covalently and densely immobilized inside the membrane pores by the uniform introduction of poly(acrylic acid) (PAAc) via the plasma graft polymerization technique, followed by the active ester method. This membrane shows excellent antibody retention by covalent binding. The detection test was carried out via a sandwich-type assay, and all reaction steps from the antigen-antibody reaction to the enzyme reaction were conducted by permeating each solution into the pores. The detection test showed a signal comparable to that of the conventional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, although the detection time required in the test was shortened to 35 min. The reason for achieving both high sensitivity and short detection time is that the antibody accumulated pore space with high selectivity and promoted contact between the reactants by solution permeation. This report is expected to aid the design of systems for membrane-based devices, which currently have problems associated with sensitivity, rapidity, selectivity, or amount of sample. We further expect that this system could be applied to various diagnostic areas, including point-of-care testing.