Long-term Castration-related Outcomes in Patients With High-risk Localized Prostate Cancer Treated With Androgen Deprivation Therapy With or Without Docetaxel and Estramustine in the UNICANCER GETUG-12 Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel and estramustine (DE) significantly improved relapse-free survival in patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for 3 years and a local treatment in the GETUG-12 phase III trial. We sought to explore whether the addition of DE impacts long-term treatment-related side effects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients randomized within the UNICANCER GETUG-12 trial at Gustave Roussy who were alive when ADT was discontinued were followed-up prospectively. Serum testosterone levels and clinical data regarding body weight, libido, erection, and cardio-vascular events were collected. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients were included: 36 patients had been treated with ADT plus a local treatment and 42 with ADT+DE plus a local treatment. With a median follow-up of 5.9 years after ADT discontinuation, serum testosterone levels returned to normal values (> 200 ng/mL) for 57 (78%) of 72 evaluable patients, and 29 (43%) of 68 evaluable patients reported erections allowing intercourse without medical assistance. No impact of DE on testosterone level recovery, libido, quality of erections, and changes in body weight after ADT discontinuation was detected. The incidence of cardiovascular events was low and similar in both treatment arms. CONCLUSION: Treatment with DE was not associated with excess long-term castration-related toxicity in men with high-risk localized prostate cancer. The relapse-free survival improvement seen with DE in GETUG-12 is likely not related to differed testosterone recovery.

Phase 2 Study of Cyclophosphamide, Etoposide, and Estramustine in Patients With Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND: There are no effective chemotherapies for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) whose disease has failed to respond to taxanes or patients who do not wish to receive intravenous drugs. We hypothesized that low doses of multiple medications with prolonged exposure would result in a high response rate and low toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with mCRPC were eligible for this phase 2 trial. The primary endpoint was a prostate-specific antigen decrease of more than 50%. CEE consisted of cyclophosphamide (50 mg/m2), etoposide (50 mg/m2), and estramustine 280 mg provided orally once a day for 14-day cycles every 28 days. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were enrolled and included in all evaluations. The prostate-specific antigen response rate was 46% in all patients, 53% in chemotherapy-naive subjects, and 31% after docetaxel chemotherapy. Thirty subjects had measurable lesions, 1 (3%) had complete response, 2 (7%) partial response, and 22 (73%) stable disease, for a clinical benefit of 83%. Sixty percent experienced an improvement in their performance status, and 65% reported improvement in their pain. The median overall survival was 18.6 months in all patients, 20.4 months in chemotherapy-naive patients and 11.3 months in patients whose disease progressed while receiving docetaxel therapy. Grade 3/4 treatment-related toxicities included 20% neutropenia, 10% thrombocytopenia, 10% deep-vein thrombosis, 8% anemia, 8% fatigue, 4% death, and 2% anorexia and stomatitis. CONCLUSION: CEE was an all-oral, easy-to-administer, and effective triple-drug therapy for patients with mCRPC.

Phase 2 Study of Weekly Paclitaxel Plus Estramustine in Metastatic Hormone-Refractory Prostate Carcinoma: ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (E1898) Trial.

INTRODUCTION: This multicenter phase 2 study assessed the combination of estramustine and weekly paclitaxel with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We enrolled 77 patients who had received no prior chemotherapy for CRPC between 1998 and 2000; a total of 74 subjects were eligible for the study. Each 8-week cycle included paclitaxel 90 mg/m2 provided intravenously weekly for 6 weeks, followed by 2 weeks off therapy and oral estramustine 280 mg twice daily for 3 days beginning 24 hours before the first dose of paclitaxel. The primary end point was rate of objective or prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response at 16 weeks. A 50% response rate was considered of further interest. RESULTS: Eligible patients received a median of 3 cycles (range, 1-10 cycles). The response rate among patients with measurable disease was 34% (95% confidence interval [CI], 19-52). The PSA response rate was 58% (95% CI, 47-70). Clinical benefit rate was 45% (95% CI, 33-57). The median progression-free survival was 5.9 months (95% CI, 4.4-6.7). The median overall survival was 17.6 months (95% CI, 14.6-20.8). The most common clinical grade 3/4 toxicities were fatigue (14%) and sensory neuropathy (7%). Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities included lymphopenia (21%) and anemia (9%). There was one toxicity-related death. Quality-of-life scores improved by week 8, but the change was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The combination has activity defined by PSA declines in CRPC but did not meet the protocol-specified end point for efficacy as defined by objective response rate. Since this study was conducted, more effective, better-tolerated regimens have been developed.

Chemotherapy with or without estramustine for treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Recently, increasing relevant studies researched the efficacy of castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients using chemotherapy with or without estramustine, in order to assess the efficacy and toxicity of combining estramustine with chemotherapy for the treatment of CRPC. METHODS: Relevant randomized clinical trials were systematically searched from the databases Pubmed, Embase, and Web of science up to April 1, 2016. Data were centrally extracted and analyzed from the previous studies by 2 independent reviewers. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) with pooled hazard ratios. Secondary endpoints were prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response and grade 3 or 4 toxicity using pooled odds ratios. Stata version 12.0 software was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Overall, this meta-analysis identified 9 eligible articles, including a total of 956 patients, who had been accrued between January 1, 1993 and December 1, 2010 and randomly divided into chemotherapy with estramustine and without estramustine. Chemotherapy (with or without estramustine) consisted of docetaxel, paclitaxel, ixabepilone, epirubicin, and vinblastine. Patients who received chemotherapy with estramustine had a better improvement in PSA response rate, comparing those without estramustine (OR = 1.84, 95% CI = 1.20-2.80). However, OS between the 2 groups indicated no significant differences (HR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.77-1.05). Besides, these results of meta-analysis showed no obvious differences between these 2 groups in grade 3 or 4 adverse effects, including anemia (OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.38-1.57), neutropenia (OR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.59-1.43), thrombocytopenia (OR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.19-2.42), nausea (OR = 2.34, 95% CI = 0.81-6.72), vomiting (OR = 2.43, 95% CI = 0.69-8.51), diarrhea (OR = 3.45, 95% CI = 0.93-12.76), fatigue (OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.32-1.41), neuropathy (OR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.21-1.44), allergic reaction (OR = 1.60, 95% CI = 0.37-6.84), thromboembolic event (OR = 2.18, 95% CI = 0.86-5.51), and edema (OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.18-5.95). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis indicated chemotherapy with additional estramustine increased the PSA response rate. However, OS and grade 3 or 4 toxicity were not improved for these patients with CRPC.

[Efficacy and Prognostic Factors of Estracyt ® in Patients with Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC) : From the Data Analysis of Estracyt ® Special Drug Use Investigation].

Estracyt○R (estramustine phosphate) is a medical drug for prostate cancer with cytotoxic activity causing disruption of microtubule organization and indirect androgen production suppressing activity by its metabolite, estradiol. Based on the data obtained from the Estracyt○R Special Drug Use Investigation which surveyed the clinical efficacy and safety of Estracyt○R in patients with prostate cancer whose relapse of prostate cancer after combined androgen blockade (CAB) therapy was confirmed, we evaluated the progression-free survival, prognostic factor, decrease in prostate specific antigen (PSA) level and safety. This surveillance was conducted at 147 institutions nationwide between October, 2010 and September, 2013 and clinical efficacy was evaluated in 239 cases and safety in 329 cases. The median duration of progression-free survival, PSA progression-free survival and PSA response were 169 days (95%CI, 142-190), 197 days (95%CI, 169-267) and 385 days, respectively. The decrease in PSA level was observed in 125 cases (52.3%). Rate of PSA decline ＞50 and ＞25% were 18.4 and 43.1, respectively, and rate of PSA best response (PSA decline ＞ 50%) was 32.6%. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that long duration of prior CAB therapy, Estracyt○R - pretreatment PSA value and bone metastasis influenced progression-free survival significantly. Adverse events were observed in 127 cases (38.6%). The major adverse events were anorexia which was observed in 35 cases (10.9%), gastrointestinal disorders observed in 32 cases (9.7%), abnormal laboratory test values observed in 31 cases (9.4%) and gynecomastia observed in 16 cases (4.9%). These results suggest the clinical efficacy and safety of Estracyt○R for chemotherapy-naïve castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), and Estracyt○R is regarded as one of the treatment options for patients with CRPC, especially for patients who had long duration of prior CAB therapy.

Chemotherapy plus estramustine for management of castration-resistant prostate cancer: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: Estramustine, an agent with both hormonal and non-hormonal effects in men, is supposed to be effective in treating castration-resistant prostate cancer. However, previous studies have reported conflicting results. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of additional estramustine to chemotherapy. METHODS: Data sources including PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were searched to identify potentially relevant randomized controlled trials. Prostate specific antigen (PSA) response, overall survival, and grade 3 to 4 toxicity were analyzed. RESULTS: Seven randomized controlled trials, a total of 839 patients, were enrolled. The pooled odds ratio for PSA response was 3.02 (95% CI=1.69-5.39, P=.0002); the pooled hazard ratio for overall survival was .95 (95% CI=.80-1.14, P=.58); the pooled odds ratio for nausea/vomiting and cardiovascular toxicity were 3.90 (95% CI=1.05-14.45, P=.04) and 2.22 (95% CI=1.15-4.30, P=.02). No significant difference was detected for neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, fatigue, or neuropathy (P>.05). CONCLUSIONS: According to this meta-analysis, chemotherapy with additional estramustine increased the PSA response rate. However, it increased the risk of grade 3 or 4 adverse effects such as nausea/vomiting and cardiovascular events, and the overall survival was not improved for castration-resistant prostate cancer patients.

Weekly, low-dose docetaxel combined with estramustine for Japanese castration-resistant prostate cancer: its efficacy and safety profile compared with tri-weekly standard-dose treatment.

BACKGROUND: We retrospectively investigated the efficacy and safety profile of weekly low-dose docetaxel (DTX) with estramustine in comparison with triweekly standard-dose DTX treatment for Japanese patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). METHODS: Between April 2002 and January 2011, 75 CRPC patients were treated with triweekly DTX (60-75 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks) (standard-dose group), and 76 CRPC patients were treated with weekly low-dose DTX (20-30 mg/m(2) on days 2 and 9 with estramustine 560 mg on days 1-3 and 8-10) every 3 weeks (low-dose group). Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response and progression-free and overall survival were analyzed in each group. RESULTS: Median serum PSA level of the standard-dose group and low-dose group was 25.0 and 35.5 ng/ml, respectively. In the standard-dose and low-dose groups, 57.8 and 65.2 % of patients, respectively, achieved a PSA decline ≥ 50 %. There was no significant difference in either median time to progression between the standard-dose group (10.0 months) and low-dose group (7.1 months) or in median duration of survival between the standard-dose group (24.2 months) and low-dose group (30.6 months). Multivariate analysis with a Cox proportional hazards regression model showed that DTX treatment protocol did not influence the risk of death. Incidences of grade 3-4 neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia were significantly higher in the standard-dose versus low-dose group (58.7 vs. 7.9 %, 16.0 vs. 3.9 %, and 8.0 vs. 0 %, respectively). CONCLUSION: For Japanese CRPC patients, weekly low-dose DTX combined with estramustine has similar efficacy to standard-dose DTX but with fewer adverse events.

Efficacy of estramustine phosphate sodium hydrate (EMP) monotherapy in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients: report of 102 cases and review of literature.

This retrospective chart review study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of estramustine phosphate sodium hydrate (EMP) monotherapy in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and to determine who would benefit from EMP therapy. EMP was administered at a daily dose of 560 mg to 102 patients as a third-line therapy, who had already received combined androgen blockade (CAB) and subsequent alternative antiandrogen therapy. The responses to EMP after its induction and its toxicity were evaluated. We also analyzed the association between the clinicopathological factors of the patients and their responses to EMP therapy. A reduction in the serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) 4 weeks after induction was observed in 70 patients (68.6%), while 30 cases (29.4%) achieved more than 50% reduction of PSA. Long-term reduction of PSA from baseline for more than 6 months was observed in 31 patients (30.4%). EMP treatment was discontinued in 11 patients (10.8%) because of side effects (nausea in six patients, gynecomastia in three patients, eruption in one patient, and liver dysfunction in one patient). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that long duration of prior hormonal therapy was an independent favorable factor for reduced PSA levels, long responses, and overall survival. The data suggest that oral EMP administration as a third-line monotherapy is well tolerated and effective to some degree in patients with CRPC who have already received CAB and subsequent alternative antiandrogen therapy. Thus, EMP can be regarded as one treatment option, especially for patients whose prior duration of hormonal therapy was long.

Changes in fPSA level could discriminate tPSA flare-up from tPSA progression in patients with castration-refractory prostate cancer during the initial phase of docetaxel-based chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether changes in fPSA level could predict tPSA flare-up in patients with castration-refractory prostate cancer during the initial phase of docetaxel-based chemotherapy. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 79 consecutive patients who received docetaxel-based chemotherapy at our institution. The treatment protocols included docetaxel 75 mg/m² every 21 days, with either prednisone 5 mg twice daily or estramustine 280 mg three times daily on days 1-5; treatment with dexamethasone preceded docetaxel therapy. All PSA values were determined before every cycle of docetaxel-based treatment. RESULTS: According to changes in tPSA level, 79 patients were divided into 3 groups: response (group 1), progression (group 2) and flare-up (group 3). fPSA and tPSA levels showed different patterns in groups 1, 2 and 3. Changes in fPSA level were independent of the changes in tPSA level in group 3, which decreased during chemotherapy. However, comparing with fPSA changes in group 3, changes in fPSA level were in accordance with tPSA changes in groups 1 and 2. Estimated median survival in groups 1, 2 and 3 was 23, 13 and 21 months, respectively. Median survival for patients in groups 1 (P = 0.008 vs group 2) and 3 (P = 0.029 vs group 2) is significantly longer than for patients who experienced progressive disease under therapy. However, there was no statistically significant difference in survival between groups 1 and 3. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, we observed that changes in fPSA level could possibly discriminate tPSA flare-up from tPSA progression in patients with castration-refractory prostate cancer during the initial phase of docetaxel-based chemotherapy.

Docetaxel in combination with estramustine and prednisolone for castration-resistant prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of docetaxel-based chemotherapy, and to investigate pretreatment factors that can predict overall survival (OS) in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). METHODS: From June 2005 to July 2010, 70 patients with CRPC underwent docetaxel-based chemotherapy at Wakayama Medical University and related hospitals. Docetaxel was given at a dose of 70 mg/m(2) once every 3 weeks or 35 mg/m(2) twice every 3 weeks. Oral estramustine 560 mg was given concurrently for five consecutive days during weeks 1 and 2 of each cycle, and prednisolone 10 mg was given every day. Dexamethasone 8 mg was premedicated intravenously before docetaxel administration. RESULT: The patients received a median of four cycles of treatment (range 1-31). In the serum prostate-specific antigen response, 13 (18.6%) patients achieved a complete response and 29 (41.4%) achieved a partial response. Median OS and time to progression were 14 months and 6 months, respectively. Median follow-up period was 9.5 months. Two independent pretreatment risk factors that predicted OS were visceral metastasis including lymph node metastasis and anemia. Grade 3/4 neutropenia and anemia occurred in 25.7 and 8.6% of the patients, respectively. Four treatment-related deaths were seen during the observation period. CONCLUSION: The combination of docetaxel, estramustine and prednisolone was effective in Japanese patients with CRPC; however, this combination therapy should be carefully indicated to elderly and/or poor performance status patients due to its toxicity. Visceral metastasis and anemia were identified as independent risk factors which could predict OS.

Ablation of the ATP-binding cassette transporter, Abca2 modifies response to estrogen-based therapies.

The ATP-binding cassette transporter 2 (ABCA2) is an endolysosomal protein expressed in oligodendrocytes and Schwann cells, prostate, ovary and macrophages. In cell cultures, ABCA2 over-expression has been linked with resistance to the anticancer agent, estramustine phosphate (EMP; a nor-nitrogen mustard conjugate of estradiol). The present study shows that Abca2 knockout (KO) mice have greater sensitivity to a variety of side effects induced by EMP treatment. Chronic EMP (12×100 mg/kg body weight) produced mortality in 36% of KO mice, but only 7% of age-matched wild type (WT). Side effects of the drug were also more prevalent in the KO mouse. For example, during the first week of EMP treatments, 67% of KO males (compared to 6% of WT males) responded with episodic erectile events. In WT mice, ABCA2 protein localized within pene corpuscles, (which rely on modified Schwann cells for amplification of tactile signals) suggesting that the transporter may function in the erectile process. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS; a source of nitric oxide during erectile response) levels were similar in WT and KO male penile tissue. Treatment with 100 mg/kg EMP (once daily for four days) elevated serum estradiol and estrone in both WT and KO. However, the circulating levels of these estrogens were higher in KO mice implying a reduced plasma clearance of estrogens as a consequence of ABCA2 ablation. Consistent with the pro-convulsant effects of estrogens, KO mice also displayed an increased incidence of seizures following EMP (14% vs. 0%). Taken together, these data indicate that ABCA2 deficiency renders mice more sensitive to EMP treatment-induced effects implying that the transporter has a role in regulating EMP transport and/or metabolism.

Efficacy of estramustine phosphate according to risk classification of castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Treatment options for patients who progressed to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) are very limited. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of estramustine phosphate (EMP) in patients with CRPC, grouped according to the risk classification advocated by Armstrong et al. and to identify candidates for EMP treatment. Between March 2003 and July 2010, 82 patients with CRPC were treated with 280 or 560 mg EMP per os daily until disease progression or occurrence of unacceptable adverse events. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response and overall survival were evaluated according to risk classification. 52 (67%) patients achieved PSA decline. Rates of PSA decline in the good-, intermediate-, and poor-risk groups were 77, 71, and 25%, respectively, significantly higher in the good- and intermediate-risk groups than the poor-risk group (p=0.03). The median overall survival times in good-, intermediate-, and poor-risk groups were 21, 19, and 9 months, respectively (p=0.005 for good vs intermediate, p=0.001 for intermediate vs poor). When the intermediate-risk group was divided into two subgroups by PSA doubling time (PSADT), men with PSADT≥2 months achieved higher PSA response rate (88%) and longer survival (22 months) than those with PSADT<2 months (53%, 15 months). Patients with good-risk or intermediate-risk with PSA doubling time≥2 months achieved favourable PSA response and survival and may benefit from chemotherapy with EMP.

Quality of life associated with treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer: a review of the literature.

The development of new therapies for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) has increasingly focused on improving patient quality of life, mainly because of limited survival gains and continuing high morbidity burden from disease progression or the adverse effects of treatments. However, there is no generally accepted quality of life instrument for use with this patient group. This paper objectively reviews the existing literature and assesses the impact of CRPC treatments on patients' quality of life. The review also provides a narrative description of the evolving role of quality of life measures in clinical trials, and critiques the most widely used instruments.

A phase III trial of docetaxel-estramustine in high-risk localised prostate cancer: a planned analysis of response, toxicity and quality of life in the GETUG 12 trial.

AIM: To assess docetaxel-estramustine in patients with localised high-risk prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After staging pelvic lymph node dissection, patients with high-risk prostate cancer randomly received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) (3 years)+DE (4 cycles of docetaxel 70 mg/m(2)/3 weeks+estramustine 10mg/kg/dd1-5) or ADT alone. Local therapy was administered at 3 months. RESULTS: Four hundred and thirteen patients were accrued: T3-T4 (67%), Gleason score ~8 (42%), PSA >20 ng/mL (59%), pN+ (29%). In the chemotherapy arm, 94% of patients received the planned four cycles of docetaxel. Local treatment consisted of radiotherapy in 358 patients (87%) (median dose 74 Gy in both arms). ADT was given for 36 months in both arms. A PSA response (PSA ~0.2 ng/mL after 3 months of treatment) was obtained in 34% and 15% in the ADT+DE arm and in the ADT arm, respectively (p<0.0001). Febrile neutropenia occurred in only 2%. Moderate to severe hot flashes occurred less often in the ADT+DE arm (2% versus 22%; p<0.001). There was no toxicity-related death, no secondary leukaemia, and no excess second cancers. Chemotherapy had a negative impact on quality of life (global health status, p = 0.01; fatigue, p = 0.003; role functioning, p = 0.003; social functioning, p = 0.006) at 3 months but this effect disappeared at 1 year. CONCLUSION: Docetaxel-estramustine can be combined safely with standard therapy in high-risk prostate cancer, with a promising PSA response rate and no negative impact on quality of life after 1 year. Long-term follow-up is required to assess the impact on relapse and survival.

Docetaxel-based therapy with or without estramustine as first-line chemotherapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer: a meta-analysis of four randomized controlled trials.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and toxicity of the addition of estramustine to docetaxel-based chemotherapy for the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer. METHODS: We systematically searched, without language restrictions, for randomized clinical trials that compared docetaxel-based chemotherapy with or without estramustine in patients with histologically proven prostate cancer. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate and grade 3 or 4 toxicity. Data was extracted from the studies by 2 independent reviewers. The meta-analysis was performed by Stata version 10.0 software (Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas, USA). RESULTS: Four randomized clinical trials (totally 400 patients) were eligible. Meta-analysis showed that there was significant improvement in PSA response rate in docetaxel-based therapy with estramustine group, compared with docetaxel-based therapy group (OR = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.10-2.18, P = 0.012). With regard to OS (HR = 0.873, 95% CI = 0.55-1.40, P = 0.572), grade3 or 4 neutropenia (OR = 1.27, 95% CI = 0.61-2.7), anemia (OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.07-16.3), thrombocytopenia (OR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.13-5.7), diarrhea (OR = 2.3, 95% CI = 0.36-14.9), nausea (OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 0.16-8.35), mucositis (OR = 1.66, 95% CI = 0.50-5.52) , and vomiting (OR = 1.53, 95% CI = 0.23-10.3), and there were no significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: This was the first meta-analysis of docetaxel-based therapy with estramustine versus docetaxel-based chemotherapy in the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer. Our meta-analysis did not support the addition of estramustine to docetaxel-based chemotherapy for the treatment of castration- resistant prostate cancer, based on no gain in survival.

The use of estramustine phosphate in the modern management of advanced prostate cancer.

UNLABELLED: What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Estramustine phosphate has anti-tumour properties and it improves patient outcomes if combined with other chemotherapy agents such as docetaxel. The efficacy of estramustine phosphate in selected patients and its safety profile, provided used with any low-molecular-weight heparin support its use as a second-line treatment in hormone-resistant prostate cancer. OBJECTIVES: • Estramustine phosphate is a nitrogen mustard derivative of estradiol-17ß-phosphate and has anti-tumour properties. • Interest in estramustine has been renewed because of the results of clinical studies showing improved patient outcomes if estramustine is combined with other chemotherapy agents such as docetaxel. PATIENTS AND METHODS: • Relevant clinical studies using chemotherapy combinations including estramustine are discussed. • Efficacy and safety outcomes are summarized. RESULTS: • Combination therapy with estramustine and docetaxel can increase PSA response rates, improve quality of life and increase median patient survival compared with chemotherapy regimens that do not include estramustine. • Although the overall tolerability of estramustine is favourable, its use can be associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events. CONCLUSIONS: • The identification of suitable patient groups and the effective management of the risk of thromboembolism with the adjunct of low-molecular-weight heparins support the use of estramustine as an effective second-line treatment strategy in hormone-resistant prostate cancer. • These promising findings warrant further investigation in a randomized clinical trial.

Neoadjuvant docetaxel/estramustine prior to radical prostatectomy or external beam radiotherapy in high risk localized prostate cancer: a phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with locally advanced or organ confined, high risk, prostate cancer are at significant risk of having disease recurrence despite definitive local therapy. We evaluated the 2-year progression-free survival of subjects treated with chemotherapy administered prior to definitive therapy with surgery or radiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 24) with locally advanced and high risk localized prostate cancer were treated with neoadjuvant docetaxel 36 mg/m2 i.v. weekly for 3 weeks and estramustine 140 mg orally 3 times daily for 3 consecutive days every 28 days prior to definitive treatment with prostatectomy or radiation. RESULTS: All evaluable patients, except 1, completed the proposed cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with minimal dose reductions or delays. Of the 22 evaluable patients, 12 underwent radical prostatectomy and 10 underwent external beam radiation therapy. Twenty-one of 22 patients achieved a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) reduction > 25%. There were no pathologic complete responses. With a median follow-up of 24 months, the 2-year progression-free survival was 45%. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with men with high risk, locally advanced prostate adenocarcinoma, although the relative contributions of androgen deprivation therapy and docetaxel cannot be determined. The effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in preventing prostate cancer relapses should be studied in a randomized trial.

Survival benefit during zoledronic acid and docetaxel-based chemotherapy in metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients: an institutional report.

PURPOSE: To assess the overall survival (OS) of metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer (mHRPC) patients when treated with zoledronic acid (ZOL) in combination with docetaxel-based chemotherapy (docetaxel combined with estramustine or oxaliplatin or gemcitabine). METHODS: A retrospective chart review of mHRPC patients in our clinic was performed. At the time of data collection, 23 patients with mHRPC were identified, of which 15 were still alive at data analysis. Survival data was analyzed through Kaplan-Meier methodology. OS stratification by prostatic specific antigen (PSA) response (50% and 80% decline) and multivariate analysis of prognostic variables were also conducted. RESULTS: 182 cycles of chemotherapy (mean 8.27 cycles, range 1-23) were recorded. Median OS was 26 months (range 5-56; 95% CI: 4.0-48.0). No patient achieved complete response (CR), 5 (21.7%) showed partial response (PR), 2 (8.7%) minor response (MR), 7 (30.4%) stable disease (SD) and 9 (39.1%) progressive disease (PD). Twelve (52.2%) patients exhibited a decrease in PSA levels >50% (9 of 12 >80%). No association of age, PSA response, or tumor response with OS could be demonstrated. The most frequent toxicities were anaemia (52.1%) and neutropenia (26%). CONCLUSION: In our clinical setting, ZOL and docetaxel- containing chemotherapy was a beneficial therapeutic scheme for the patients in terms of safety and survival.

[Two cases of pellagra associated with chemotherapy of docetaxel, estramustine, dexamethasone].

An 81-year-old male with hormone refractory prostate cancer, received chemotherapy of Docetaxel, Estramustine and dexamethasone as an outpatient. After 4 courses of chemotherapy, he was admitted to our hospital in December 2007 because of general fatigue, appetite loss and erythema of the back of hands and face. He was diagnosed with pellagra. Nicotinic acid was administered and the symptoms disappeared. An 80-year-old male with hormone refractory prostate cancer, received chemotherapy of Docetaxel, Estramustine and dexamethasone without admission. After 8 courses of the chemotherapy, appetite loss appeared. In January 2008, medical examinations revealed nails peeling off, facial erythema and erosion of the back of his hands. He was diagnosed with pellagra. Nicotinic acid was administered and the symptoms disappeared. Pellagra, a nicotinic acid deficiency disease, is rarely observed clinically nowadays. However, it may occur in the patients, undergoing chemotherapy without admission.

[Effect of the 5-HT3 receptor antagonist granisetron on estramustine phosphate sodium (Estracyt)-induced emesis in ferrets].

Estracyt(R) is an antimitotic drug used for the treatment of prostate cancer, and its most common adverse effects are nausea and vomiting. In this study, we investigated the effect of a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, granisetron, on emesis induced in ferrets by estramustine phosphate sodium (EMP), the active ingredient of Estracyt. To clarify the mechanism of action of EMP-induced emesis, we also investigated the effect of EMP on the release of serotonin (5-HT) in the isolated rat ileum. EMP (3 mg/kg, per os) induced 75.3+/-10.2 retching episodes and 7.5+/-1.3 vomiting episodes during a 2-h observation period. The latency to the first emetic response was 58.0+/-13.5 min. Granisetron (0.1 mg/kg, per os) administered 1 h before the administration of EMP reduced the number of EMP-induced retching and vomiting episodes to 1.3+/-1.3 and 1.0+/-1.0, respectively, and prolonged the latency by a factor of almost two. EMP (10-5 and 10-4 M) increased 5-HT release from isolated rat ileum, and 10 -7 M granisetron almost completely inhibited the increase induced by 10-4 M EMP. These results suggest that EMP induces nausea and vomiting via 5-HT release from the ileum, and that 5-HT3 receptor antagonists may be useful to prevent gastrointestinal adverse effects that occur during treatment with Estracyt.