Evaluating fentanyl test strips as a harm reduction strategy in rural and urban counties: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Opioid-related fatalities are a leading cause of death in Ohio and nationally, with an increasing number of overdoses attributable to fentanyl. Rapid fentanyl test strips can identify fentanyl and some fentanyl analogs in urine samples and are increasingly being used to check illicit drugs for fentanyl before they are used. Fentanyl test strips are a promising harm reduction strategy; however, little is known about the real-world acceptability and impact of fentanyl test strip use. This study investigates fentanyl test strip distribution and education as a harm reduction strategy to prevent overdoses among people who use drugs. METHODS: The research team will recruit 2400 individuals ≥ 18 years with self-reported use of illicit drugs or drugs purchased on the street within the past 6 months. Recruitment will occur at opioid overdose education and naloxone distribution programs in 16 urban and 12 rural Ohio counties. Participating sites will be randomized at the county level to the intervention or non-intervention study arm. A brief fentanyl test strip educational intervention and fentanyl test strips will be provided to participants recruited from sites in the intervention arm. These participants will be eligible to receive additional fentanyl test strips for 2 years post-enrollment. Participants recruited from sites in the non-intervention arm will not receive fentanyl test strip education or fentanyl test strips. All participants will be followed for 2 years post-enrollment using biweekly, quarterly, and 6-month surveys. Primary outcomes include (1) identification of perceived barriers and facilitating factors associated with incorporating fentanyl test strip education and distribution into opioid overdose education and naloxone distribution programs; (2) differences in knowledge and self-efficacy regarding how to test drugs for fentanyl and strategies for reducing overdose risk between the intervention and non-intervention groups; and (3) differences in non-fatal and fatal overdose rates between the intervention and non-intervention groups. DISCUSSION: Findings from this cluster randomized controlled trial will contribute valuable information about the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of integrating fentanyl test strip drug checking in rural and urban communities in Ohio and help guide future overdose prevention interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05463341. Registered on July 19, 2022. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05463341.

A lot testing protocol for quality assurance of fentanyl test strips for harm reduction applications.

Fentanyl test strips (FTS) are lateral flow immunoassays that were originally designed and validated for detecting low concentrations of fentanyl in urine. Some FTS are now being marketed for the harm reduction purpose of testing street drugs for the presence of fentanyl. This manuscript provides a simple protocol to assess whether different brands and lots of fentanyl test strips perform adequately for use in drug checking. The results gathered from this protocol will document problems with particular lots or brands of FTS, help buyers choose from among the array of products, provide feedback to manufacturers to improve their products, and serve as an early warning system for ineffective products.

Performance Evaluation of 2 FDA-Approved Fentanyl Immunoassays against LC-MS/MS Reference.

BACKGROUND: Fentanyl, a synthetic opioid, has caused many recent overdose deaths. Diagnosis of fentanyl abuse is not served by traditional opiate assays due to differences in chemical structure between synthetics and natural opioids. To our knowledge, this is the first study that uses liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) as the reference method to evaluate and compare the ARK Fentanyl II Assay (ARK II) and the Fentanyl II Enzyme Immunoassay by Roche (FEN2). The ARK II is designed to detect fentanyl in urine samples, whereas the FEN2 is designed to detect norfentanyl, which is the major metabolite. METHODS: Two hundred patient urine samples including 100 positive and 100 negative samples according to an in-house LC-MS/MS assay were selected for the study. These samples were tested using the ARK II and the FEN2 to determine their performances relative to LC-MS/MS results. RESULTS: The FEN2 showed a positive and negative predictive value of 100% and 97% and a concordance with LC-MS/MS of 98.5% (kappa 0.97). The ARK II showed a positive and negative predictive value of 100% and 95% and a concordance with LC-MS/MS of 97.5% (kappa 0.95). Additionally, the FEN2 accurately identified 9 positive samples with a range of fentanyl concentrations from 0 to 18 ng/mL for which norfentanyl levels were less than the cutoff of 5 ng/mL, indicating potentially greater sensitivity than otherwise stated. CONCLUSIONS: The FEN2 and the ARK II were evaluated to be similar in terms of positive and negative predictive value during the analysis of 200 patient samples, as well as equally concordant with the LC-MS/MS reference, despite differences in design.

A Comparative Analysis of Two Commonly Used FDA-Approved Immunoassays for Fentanyl Detection.

BACKGROUND: Given the opioid epidemic, fentanyl screening in urine has become increasingly important. Immunoassays remain the most common screening methodology due to the high throughput and ease of integration into automated chemistry systems. The fentanyl ARK II from Ark Diagnostics is a widely used immunoassay, while a novel fentanyl assay called FEN2 by Lin-Zhi has become available on the Roche platform. Here, we evaluate and compare their performance. METHODS: Four hundred and thirty-four urine samples were analyzed for fentanyl across the Lin-Zhi FEN2 and ARK II assays on the Cobas c502 platform. Samples were analyzed immediately upon request for drug of abuse screening or frozen for subsequent analysis. For confirmation testing, a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method with a limit of detection of 1 ng/mL for fentanyl/norfentanyl was used. Any sample with either fentanyl or norfentanyl above the LC-MS/MS cutoff was deemed positive. RESULTS: The ARK II had 11 false negatives and 7 false positives, while the Lin-Zhi FEN2 had 12 false negatives and 2 false positives. This resulted in ARK II having a sensitivity and specificity of 90.4% and 97.8% respectively, while Lin-Zhi FEN2 had a sensitivity and specificity of 89.5% and 99.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Both the ARK II and Lin-Zhi FEN2 immunoassays detected fentanyl well. Overall, the Lin-Zhi assay had slightly better specificity than ARK II, in our data set. While some discrepant results were observed between the 2 immunoassay systems, most occurred near the immunoassay detection cutoffs.

Evaluation of a Rapid Drug Test Device for Urine Fentanyl Compared to Mass Spectrometry and 2 Urine Fentanyl Assays.

BACKGROUND: A new Rapid Drug Test Device (RDTD) is available for analysis of urine fentanyl. With the rise in fentanyl abuse in the United States, we evaluated the analytical performance of the RDTD test strip compared to mass spectrometry and 2 urine fentanyl immunoassays. METHODS: Leftover, deidentified urine samples collected from inpatients and outpatients from our psychiatric hospital and other clinics were frozen at <-70°C, thawed at room temperature, and centrifuged. Aliquots were tested with the RDTD (CLIA Waived, Inc.) test strips and 2 urine fentanyl immunoassays: the ARK Fentanyl II assay (ARK Diagnostics Inc.) and the Immunalysis SEFRIA Fentanyl assay (Immunalysis Corporation). Both assays were conducted on the Abbott Alinity c chemistry analyzer (Abbott Laboratories). Mass spectrometry analysis was performed at ARUP Laboratories. All assays had a 1 ng/mL positive cutoff. RESULTS: A total of 142 urine samples included 70 positive and 72 negative samples. The RDTD strips had lower sensitivity (84.3%) and efficiency (85.9%) and showed a specificity of 87.5% compared to the other assays. The ARK Fentanyl II assay showed identical sensitivity (95.7%) to the Immunalysis SEFRIA Fentanyl assay but had higher specificity (94.4% vs 81.9%) and overall efficiency (95.1% vs 88.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Differences were noted in the number of false negatives and positives among the assays. The RDTD demonstrated acceptable performance in detecting urine fentanyl in our patient population and would provide faster test results at point-of-care testing sites in our healthcare enterprise.

Fentanyl Test Strips for Harm Reduction: A Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: High potency synthetic opioids like fentanyl have continued to replace or contaminate the supply of illicit drugs in North America, with fentanyl test strips (FTSs) often used as a harm reduction tool for overdose prevention. The available evidence to support FTS for harm reduction has yet to be summarized. METHODS: A search of PubMed, Ovid Embase, and Web of Science was conducted in March 2023. A 2-stage review was conducted to screen by title and abstract and then by full text by 2 reviewers. Data were extracted from each study using a standardized template. RESULTS: A total of 91 articles were included, mostly from North America, predominantly reporting on FTS along with other harm reduction tools, and all conducted after 2016. No randomized controlled trials are reported. Robust evidence exists supporting the sensitivity and specificity of FTS, along with their acceptability and feasibility of use for people who use drugs and as a public health intervention. However, limited research is available on the efficacy of FTS as a harm reduction tool for behavior change, engagement in care, or overdose prevention. CONCLUSIONS: Though FTSs are highly sensitive and specific for point of care testing, further research is needed to assess the association of FTS use with overdose prevention. Differences in FTS efficacy likely exist between people who use opioids and nonopioid drugs, with additional investigation strongly needed. As drug testing with point-of-care immunoassays is embraced for nonfentanyl contaminants such as xylazine and benzodiazepines, increased investment in examining overdose prevention is necessary.

An urgent need for community lot testing of lateral flow fentanyl test strips marketed for harm reduction in Northern America.

BACKGROUND: Fentanyl test strips (FTS) are lateral flow immunoassay strips designed for detection of ng/mL levels of fentanyl in urine. In 2021, the US Centers for Disease Control and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Administration stated that federal funds could be used for procurement of FTS for harm reduction strategies approved by the government such as drug checking. The market for FTS has expanded rapidly in the US and Canada. However, there is no regulatory oversight by either government to ensure proper function of FTS that are being marketed for drug checking. MAIN BODY: Many brands of FTS have rapidly entered the harm reduction market, creating concerns about the reproducibility and accuracy of their performance from brand to brand and lot to lot. Some examples are provided in this Comment. Similar problems with product quality were observed in the mid 2000's when lateral flow immunoassays for malaria were funded in many countries and again in 2020, when COVID-19 tests were in huge demand. The combination of high demand and low levels of regulation and enforcement led some manufacturers to join the goldrush without adequate field testing or quality assurance. We argue that the harm reduction community urgently needs to set a lot checking program in place. A set of simple protocols for conducting the tests and communicating the results have been developed, and are described in the following Perspectives paper in this issue. CONCLUSION: In the absence of governmental regulation and enforcement, the harm reduction community should implement a FTS lot checking program. Based on previous experience with the malaria diagnostic lot checking program, this inexpensive effort could identify products that are not suitable for harm reduction applications and provide valuable feedback to manufacturers. Dissemination of the results will help harm reduction organizations to ensure that FTS they use for drug checking are fit for the purpose.

Rapid and Sensitive Detection of Fentanyl and Its Analogs by a Novel Chemiluminescence Immunoassay.

BACKGROUND: Abuse of fentanyl and its analogs is a major contributor to the opioid overdose epidemic in the United States, but detecting and quantifying trace amounts of such drugs remains a challenge without resorting to sophisticated mass spectrometry-based methods. METHODS: A sensitive immunoassay with a sub-picogram limit of detection for fentanyl and a wide range of fentanyl analogs has been developed, using a novel high-affinity antibody fused with NanoLuc, a small-size luciferase that can emit strong and stable luminescence. When used with human urine samples, the assay has a sub-picogram limit of detection for fentanyl, with results fully concordant with LC-MS. RESULTS: When applied to clinical samples, the novel chemiluminescence immunoassay can detect low positive fentanyl missed by routine screening immunoassays, with a limit of detection of 0.8 pg/mL in human urine. When applied to environmental samples, the assay can detect levels as low as 0.25 pg fentanyl per inch2 of environment surface. Assay turnaround time is less than 1 h, with inexpensive equipment and the potential for high-throughput automation or in-field screening. CONCLUSIONS: We have established a novel assay that may have broad applications in clinical, environmental, occupational, and forensic scenarios for detection of trace amounts of fentanyl and its analogs.

Bedside urine testing for fentanyl in self-reported heroin users in a tertiary Brisbane emergency department.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if patients presenting to our toxicology unit following self-reported heroin use had positive urine immunoassay testing for fentanyl or its analogues. METHODS: Urine samples from consenting patients were tested at the bedside for the presence of opiates or fentanyl and its analogues. RESULTS: Over a 30-month period, 58 patients were recruited. All samples tested positive for opiates, but none tested positive for fentanyl or its analogues. CONCLUSION: In patients presenting to our toxicology unit in Brisbane, we did not find any cases where the urine of patients self-reporting heroin exposure tested positive for fentanyl or its analogues.

Understand the FDA-cleared fentanyl testing: A clinical evaluation of the SEFRIA fentanyl immunoassay.

BACKGROUND: Screening for fentanyl has been adopted by many clinical laboratories to detect illicit drug use and monitor medication adherence. However, compared to other urine drug testing, fentanyl screening assays are relatively new and therefore their clinical performances are largely unknown. This study extensively evaluated the clinical performance, positive cutoff, and interference profile of SEFRIA fentanyl immunoassay in real patient settings. METHODS: The FDA-cleared cutoff of 1.0 was verified with 21 urine samples with low or undetectable levels of fentanyl. After assay implementation, all screened-positive samples were confirmed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. A new cutoff was derived from the numeric values of the false positive (FP) screening results. The FP rates before and after implementing the new cutoff were compared. Interferences were identified by an untargeted drug analysis and confirmed by spiking experiments. RESULTS: A total of 3951 screening results were reviewed in the first two months of the assay utilization, 410 were screened-positive, and 157 (38 %) were FP. After a new cutoff of 1.3 was implemented, the FP rate was reduced to 17 % based on 11119 screening results. Trazodone, labetalol, and haloperidol were identified as major interferents, accounting for 56 % of the FP results using the cutoff of 1.3. CONCLUSION: By applying the new cutoff and including an interference comment to positive screening results, the FP rate was reduced from initial 38 % to 7.5 % (17 % times 56 %).

Evaluation of in-house drug evidence testing by King County Medical Examiner's Office in "real-time" fatal overdose surveillance.

With the escalating overdose epidemic, many surveillance efforts have appeared. In 2018, King County Medical Examiner's Office (KCMEO) initiated a fatal overdose surveillance project aimed at expediting death certification and disseminating timely information. In this project, KCMEO investigators collected items of evidence of drug use from overdose death scenes, which were tested by five in-house methods, four using handheld devices: TruNarc Raman spectrometer, with and without the manufacture's H-Kit, Rigaku ResQ Raman spectrometer, and MX908 mass spectrometer. The fifth in-house method used fentanyl-specific urine test strips. Results from in-house testing were compared with results from Washington State Patrol (WSP) Materials Analysis Laboratory. From 2019 to 2022, there were 4244 evidence items of drugs and paraphernalia collected from 1777 deaths scenes. A total of 7526 in-house tests were performed on collected specimens, and 2153 tests were performed by the WSP laboratory using standard analytical methods. The WSP results served as reference standards to calculate performance metrics of the in-house methods. Sensitivities, specificities, and predictive values ranged from good to poor depending on the method, drug, and evidence type. Certain drugs were often associated with specific evidence types. Acetaminophen was frequently found in combination with fentanyl. Fentanyl test strips gave good scores for detecting fentanyl; otherwise, in-house methods using handheld devices had poor performance scores with novel drugs and drugs diluted in mixtures. The results showed that in-house testing of drug evidence has value for medical examiner overdose surveillance, but it is resource intensive, and success depends on collaboration with forensic laboratories.

Performance of a Norfentanyl Immunoassay in Specimens with Low Concentrations of Fentanyl and/or Norfentanyl.

BACKGROUND: Many fentanyl immunoassays are limited in their ability to detect norfentanyl. Urine specimens collected from individuals who have been exposed to fentanyl frequently have detectable concentrations of norfentanyl (≥2 ng/mL) but low concentrations of fentanyl (<2 ng/mL) by LC-MS/MS. The Lin-Zhi Fentanyl II Immunoassay (Lin-Zhi) claims 100% cross-reactivity with norfentanyl and therefore may detect exposure missed by other assays. METHODS: In addition to verifying the manufacturer's analytical sensitivity claims, we selected 92 urine specimens with low-positive Lin-Zhi results (1-99 absorbance units, lowest 10%) for analysis by the Immunalysis Health Equity Impact Assessment and ARK II fentanyl methods. The accuracy of the 3 immunoassays was compared to LC-MS/MS as the reference method. RESULTS: Spiking studies using purified fentanyl and norfentanyl and a set of 100 consecutive specimens confirmed the manufacturer's claims of limit of detection for fentanyl (3.8 ng/mL) and norfentanyl (5.0 ng/mL). However, the 92 low-positive patient specimens demonstrated concentrations of norfentanyl and fentanyl below 2.0 ng/mL by LC-MS/MS, with 47 (51%) having only norfentanyl detected. When comparing Lin-Zhi to the Immunalysis and ARK II immunoassays, only 27 (29%) of the 92 specimens were concordant. Fifty-two (57%) of the specimens were positive by LC-MS/MS and Lin-Zhi but false negative by one or both other immunoassays. Seven specimens (8%) were positive by Lin-Zhi but negative by the other immunoassays and had undetectable concentrations (<2 ng/mL) of fentanyl and norfentanyl by LC-MS/MS. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical sensitivity of the Lin-Zhi exceeds the manufacturer's claims, providing results comparable to LC-MS/MS methods.

Tackling new psychoactive substances through metabolomics: UHPLC-HRMS study on natural and synthetic opioids in male and female murine models.

Novel psychoactive substances (NPS) represent a broad class of drugs new to the illicit market that often allow passing drug-screening tests. They are characterized by a variety of structures, rapid transience on the drug scene and mostly unknown metabolic profiles, thus creating an ever-changing scenario with evolving analytical targets. The present study aims at developing an indirect screening strategy for NPS monitoring, and specifically for new synthetic opioids (NSOs), based on assessing changes in endogenous urinary metabolite levels as a consequence of the systemic response following their intake. The experimental design involved in-vivo mice models: 16 animals of both sex received a single administration of morphine or fentanyl. Urine was collected before and after administration at different time points; the samples were then analysed with an untargeted metabolomics LC-HRMS workflow. According to our results, the intake of opioids resulted in an elevated energy demand, that was more pronounced on male animals, as evidenced by the increase in medium and long chain acylcarnitines levels. It was also shown that opioid administration disrupted the pathways related to catecholamines biosynthesis. The observed alterations were common to both morphine and fentanyl: this evidence indicate that they are not related to the chemical structure of the drug, but rather on the drug class. The proposed strategy may reinforce existing NPS screening approaches, by identifying indirect markers of drug assumption.

Rapid detection of furanyl fentanyl in complex matrices using Leidenfrost desorption-assisted low-temperature arc plasma ionization mass spectrometry.

The abuse of illicit drugs poses serious threats to the physical and mental health of users, as well as to the overall safety and welfare of society. In this work, we present a newly developed technique for drug detection based on mass spectrometry. This technique combines Leidenfrost desorption with low-temperature arc plasma ionization mass spectrometry. This method is applicable for detecting furanyl fentanyl in complex matrices. Key advantages of this technique include minimal sample fragmentation and high sensitivity for detection. The Leidenfrost desorption plays a pivotal role in this methodology, as it spontaneously concentrates analyte molecules during the gradual evaporation of the solvent. Eventually, these concentrated molecules are redistributed at their highest concentrations, resulting in exceptionally high sensitivity. In the course of our investigation, we achieved a remarkable detection limit of 10 pg mL-1 for furanyl fentanyl in pure water. Moreover, the characteristic ion peaks of furanyl fentanyl can be distinctly identified within complex matrices such as wine, beverages, urine, and lake water. This innovative drug detection technology offers several advantages, including a simple setup, cost-effectiveness, rapid detection, high sensitivity, and minimal sample pretreatment.

Performance of Fentanyl Immunoassays in an ED Patient Population.

BACKGROUND: Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid fueling the current opioid crisis in the United States. While emergency department (ED) visits due to opioid-related overdoses, injection complications, and withdrawals become increasingly more frequent, fentanyl is not detected in routine toxicology testing. We evaluated 2 FDA-approved fentanyl immunoassays in a sampled ED population. METHODS: De-identified, remnant urine specimens (n = 213) collected from patients presenting to a large ED were analyzed using ARK Fentanyl II (ARK II) and Immunalysis SEFRIA (SEFRIA) fentanyl immunoassays on an Architect c16000 (Abbott) analyzer. All discrepant specimens were evaluated by LC-MS/MS. Additionally, polysubstance abuse patterns and trends were analyzed. RESULTS: While intra-assay imprecision was comparable for ARK II and SEFRIA, inter-assay imprecision for ARK II and SEFRIA varied from 8.0% to 1.8% and from 37% to 12.5%, respectively. SEFRIA had a marginally higher false-positivity rate (3%) than ARK II (1%). Both assays had equivalent sensitivity of 95%, with ARK II (99%) having greater specificity than SEFRIA (97%). Fentanyl was detected in 13.7% of drug-panel-positive patient samples and most frequently observed in patients also testing positive for amphetamines and cocaine. Notably, fentanyl was detected in 5.3% of patient samples that were negative for all other drugs in our standard toxicology panel. CONCLUSIONS: A sizable portion of drug-positive samples from our ED were positive for fentanyl, with a subset of patients testing positive for fentanyl alone. Implementation of fentanyl testing into routine toxicology panels can elucidate polysubstance abuse paradigms and capture ED patients that would go undetected in standard panels.

Advances in fentanyl testing.

Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid that was approved by the FDA in the late 1960s. In the decades since, non-prescription use of fentanyl, its analogs, and structurally unrelated novel synthetic opioids (NSO) has become a worsening public health crisis. There is a clear need for accessible testing for these substances in biological specimens and in apprehended drugs. Immunoassays for fentanyl in urine are available but their performance is restricted to facilities that hold moderate complexity laboratory licenses. Immunoassays for other matrices such as oral fluid (OF), blood, and meconium have been developed but are not widely available. Point of care tests (POCT), such as lateral flow immunoassays or fentanyl test strips (FTS), are widely available but not approved by the FDA for clinical use. All immunoassays are vulnerable to false positive and false negative results. Immunoassays may or may not be able to detect fentanyl analogs and NSOs. Mass spectrometry (MS) can accurately and reliably measure fentanyl and its major metabolite norfentanyl in urine and oral fluid. MS is available at reference laboratories and large hospitals. Liquid chromatography paired with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is the most widely used method and has outstanding specificity and sensitivity for fentanyl and norfentanyl. When compared to immunoassays, MS is more expensive, requires more technical skill, and takes longer to result. Newer mass spectrometry methods can measure fentanyl analogs and NSO. Both mass spectrometry assays and immunoassays [in the form of fentanyl test strips (FTS)] have potential use in harm reduction programs.

Strong π-Metal Interaction Enables Liquid Interfacial Nanoarray-Molecule Co-assembly for Raman Sensing of Ultratrace Fentanyl Doped in Heroin, Ketamine, Morphine, and Real Urine.

Toward the challenge on reliable determination of trace fentanyl to avoid opioid overdose death in drug crisis, here we realize rapid and direct detection of trace fentanyl in real human urine without pretreatment by a portable surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) strategy on liquid/liquid interfacial (LLI) plasmonic arrays. It was observed that fentanyl could interact with the gold nanoparticles (GNPs) surface, facilitate the LLI self-assembly, and consequently amplify the detection sensitivity with a limit of detection (LOD) as low as 1 ng/mL in aqueous solution and 50 ng/mL spiked in urine. Furthermore, we achieve multiplex blind sample recognition and classification of ultratrace fentanyl doped in other illegal drugs, which has extremely low LODs at mass concentrations of 0.02% (2 ng in 10 µg of heroin), 0.02% (2 ng in 10 µg of ketamine), and 0.1% (10 ng in 10 µg of morphine). A logic circuit of the AND gate was constructed for automatic recognition of illegal drugs with or without fentanyl doping. The data-driven analog soft independent modeling model could quickly distinguish fentanyl-doped samples from illegal drugs with 100% specificity. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation elucidates the underlying molecular mechanism of nanoarray-molecule co-assembly through strong π-metal interactions and the differences in the SERS signal of various drug molecules. It paves a rapid identification, quantification, and classification strategy for trace fentanyl analysis, indicating broad application prospects in response to the opioid epidemic crisis.

Update: Correlation of Fentanyl Positive Drug Screens with other Medications in Patients from Pain, Rehabilitation and Behavioral Programs.

OBJECTIVE: To monitor fentanyl polydrug use over past six years. METHOD: Calculate percent of fentanyl and other drugs positive in urine drug tests. RESULTS: Percent of fentanyl positive drug tests remained unchanged, but increases in fentanyl/methamphetamine and fentanyl/marijuana were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Fentanyl laced illicit drugs remain a major substance abuse problem.

Bupivacaine Metabolite Can Interfere with Norfentanyl Measurement by LC-MS/MS.

BACKGROUND: Liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is the gold standard for the measurement of fentanyl and norfentanyl (NF) in urine and is favored over immunoassays due to its superior specificity. NF is the principal metabolite of fentanyl found in the urine and is typically present in higher abundance than fentanyl. Thus, the sensitivity and specificity of LC-MS/MS relies largely on the ability to identify and quantitate NF. METHODS: We analyzed urine specimens from women who had received bupivacaine and fentanyl for epidural analgesia during labor. We analyzed the contents of the epidural bag itself and purified bupivacaine metabolite N-desbutyl bupivacaine [or N-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)piperidine-2-carboxamide (NDB)] by LC-MS/MS. RESULTS: NDB interferes with the LC-MS/MS assay for NF. NDB passes through the Q1 mass selection filter because it is isobaric with the NF precursor ion (233 m/z). Further, it shares product ions with NF (84 m/z and 150 m/z), used as quantifier and qualifier ions, respectively, in our urine NF detection method. Baseline resolution of NDB and NF using these quantifier and qualifier ions could not be achieved. A unique product ion of NF (177 m/z) was useful for distinguishing NDB from NF. CONCLUSION: Bupivacaine is a commonly used drug. Recognition of this interference by laboratories is critical for preventing the misidentification of NF, which can have profound effects on patient care.