Novel non-invasive method for urine mapping: Deep-learning-enabled SERS spectroscopy for the rapid differential detection of kidney allograft injury.

The kidney allograft has been under continuous attack from diverse injuries since the very beginning of organ procurement, leading to a gradual decline in function, chronic fibrosis, and allograft loss. It is vital to routinely and precisely monitor the risk of injuries after renal transplantation, which is difficult to achieve because the traditional laboratory tests lack sensitivity and specificity, and graft biopsies are invasive with the risk of many complications and time-consuming. Herein, a novel method for the diagnosis of graft injury is demonstrated, using deep learning-assisted surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) of the urine analysis. Specifically, we developed a hybrid SERS substrate composed of gold and silver with high sensitivity to the urine composition under test, eliminating the need for labels, which makes measurements easy to perform and meanwhile results in extremely abundant and complex Raman vibrational bands. Deep learning algorithms were then developed to improve the interpretation of the SERS spectral fingerprints. The deep learning model was trained with SERS signals of urine samples of recipients with different injury types including delayed graft function (DGF), calcineurin-inhibitor toxicity (CNIT), T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), and BK virus nephropathy (BKVN), which explored the features of these types and achieved the injury differentiation with an overall accuracy of 93.03%. The results highlight the potential of combining label-free SERS spectroscopy with deep learning as a method for liquid biopsy of kidney allograft injuries, which can provide great potential to diagnose and evaluate allograft injuries, and thus extend the life of kidney allografts.

Artificial Urinary Biomarkers for Early Diagnosis of Acute Renal Allograft Rejection.

Acute renal allograft rejection (ARAR) after kidney transplantation associated with reduced graft survival and eventual graft failure is poorly diagnosed in hospitals. Here, we report the development of Artificial bioMarker Probes (AMPros) for sensitive urinalysis of ARAR in murine models. AMPros spontaneously go to the kidneys after systemic administration, specifically react with the prodromal immune biomarkers to activate their near-infrared fluorescence signals to report cell-mediated rejection, and efficiently undergo renal excretion into urine. Thus, AMPros enable convenient optical urinalysis that detects ARAR prior to histological manifestation of rejection, which is also earlier than current diagnostic methods measuring proinflammatory cytokines and peripheral blood lymphocyte mRNAs. Due to the high kidney specificity, AMPros-based urinalysis discriminates allograft rejection against other non-alloimmune specific diseases, which is unattainable by measurement of serological biomarkers. Such a noninvasive and sensitive urine test holds great promise in continuous monitoring of renal allograft conditions at low resource settings for timely clinical interventions.

Biomarker-Development Proteomics in Kidney Transplantation: An Updated Review.

Kidney transplantation (KT) is the optimal therapeutic strategy for patients with end-stage renal disease. The key to post-transplantation management is careful surveillance of allograft function. Kidney injury may occur from several different causes that require different patient management approaches. However, routine clinical monitoring has several limitations and detects alterations only at a later stage of graft damage. Accurate new noninvasive biomarker molecules are clearly needed for continuous monitoring after KT in the hope that early diagnosis of allograft dysfunction will lead to an improvement in the clinical outcome. The advent of "omics sciences", and in particular of proteomic technologies, has revolutionized medical research. Proteomic technologies allow us to achieve the identification, quantification, and functional characterization of proteins/peptides in biological samples such as urine or blood through supervised or targeted analysis. Many studies have investigated proteomic techniques as potential molecular markers discriminating among or predicting allograft outcomes. Proteomic studies in KT have explored the whole transplant process: donor, organ procurement, preservation, and posttransplant surgery. The current article reviews the most recent findings on proteomic studies in the setting of renal transplantation in order to better understand the effective potential of this new diagnostic approach.

Urinary cell mRNA profiling of kidney allograft recipients: Development of a portable protocol for noninvasive diagnosis of T cell mediated rejection and BK virus nephropathy.

BACKGROUND: We developed urinary cell mRNA profiling for noninvasive diagnosis of acute T cell mediated rejection (TCMR) and BK virus nephropathy (BKVN), two significant post-transplant complications. Our profiling protocol for the multicenter Clinical Trial of Transplantation-04 (CTOT-04) study consisted of centrifugation of urine to prepare cell pellets, washes, addition of an RNA preservative, storage at 800C and shipment in cold containers to our Gene Expression Monitoring (GEM) Core for RNA isolation and quantification of mRNA in RT-qPCR assays. To simplify profiling, we developed a filter-based protocol (ZFBP) that eliminated the need for centrifugation, RNA preservative, storage at 800C, and shipment in cold containers for mRNA profiling. Furthermore, we trained kidney allograft recipients to perform the filtration of urine at home using the filter and post the urinary cell lysate containing the RNA at ambient temperature to our GEM Core for profiling. Here, we report our refinement of ZFBP and investigation of its diagnostic performance characteristics. METHODS: Total RNA was isolated from kidney allograft biopsy-matched urines using a filter-based protocol complemented by a silica-membrane-based cartridge for mRNA enrichment, the Weill Cornell Hybrid Protocol (WCHP). Absolute copy numbers of CD3ε mRNA, CXCL10 mRNA, and 18S rRNA, components of the CTOT-04 three-gene TCMR diagnostic signature, and urinary cell BKV VP 1 mRNA copy number were measured using RT-qPCR assays. Mann-Whitney test, Fischer exact test, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were used for data analyses. RESULTS: Urinary cell three-gene TCMR diagnostic signature scores in urines processed using the WCHP discriminated kidney allograft recipients with TCMR (12 TCMR biopsies from 11 patients) from those without TCMR or BKVN (29 No TCMR/No BKVN biopsies from 29 patients). The median (25th and 75th percentiles) score of the CTOT-04 three-gene TCMR diagnostic signature was -0.448 (-1.664, 0.204) in the TCMR group and - 2.542 (-3.267, -1.365) in the No TCMR/ No BKVN group (P = 0.0005, Mann-Whitney test). ROC curve analysis discriminated the TCMR group from the No TCMR/ No BKVN group; the area under the ROC curve (AUROC) was 0.84 (95% Confidence Intervals [CI], 0.69 to 0.98) (P < 0.001), and TCMR was diagnosed with a sensitivity of 67% (95% CI, 35 to 89) at a specificity of 86% (95% CI, 67 to 95) using the CTOT-04 validated cutpoint of -1.213 (P = 0.0016, Fisher exact test). BKV VP1 mRNA copy number in urines processed using the WCHP discriminated patients with BKVN (n = 7) from patients without TCMR or BKVN (n = 29) and the AUROC was 1.0 (95% CI, 1.00 to 1.00) (P < 0.0001) and BKVN was diagnosed with a sensitivity of 86% (95% CI, 42 to 99) at a specificity of 100% (95% CI, 85 to 100) with the previously validated cutpoint of 6.5 × 108 BKV-VP1 mRNA copies per microgram of RNA (P < 0.0001, Fisher exact test). CONCLUSION: Urine processed using the WCHP predicted TCMR and BKVN in kidney allograft recipients. WCHP represents not only a significant advance toward the portability of urinary cell mRNA profiling but also improved patient management by minimizing their visits for urine collection.

Point-of-care non-invasive enzyme-cleavable nanosensors for acute transplant rejection detection.

Accurate and non-invasive monitoring of allograft posttransplant is essential for early detection of acute cellular rejection and determines the long-term survival of the graft. Clinically, tissue biopsy is the most effective approach for diagnosing transplant rejection. Nonetheless, the procedure is invasive and potentially triggers organ failure. This work aims to design and apply GzmB-responsive nanosensors (GBRNs) that can readily size-change in graft tissues. Subsequently, we investigate the activity of serine protease granzyme B by generating a direct colorimetric urinary readout for non-invasive detection of transplant rejection in under 1 h. In preclinical heart graft mice models of transplant rejection, GBRNs were cleaved by GzmB and excreted by the kidneys via accurate nanometre-size glomerular filtration. By exploiting the catalytic activity of ultrasmall gold nanoclusters, GBRNs urinalysis promotes ultrasensitive surveillance of rejection episodes with a receiver operator characteristic curve area under the curve of 0.896 as well as a 95% confidence interval of about 0.7701-1.000. Besides, the catalytic activity of gold nanoclusters in urine can be detected at point-of-care testing to predict the immunity responses in mice with insufficient immunosuppressive therapy. Therefore, this non-invasive, sensitive, and quantitative method is a robust and informative approach for rapid and routine monitoring of transplant allografts without invasive biopsy.

Urinary Extracellular Vesicles Are a Novel Tool to Monitor Allograft Function in Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review.

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are nanoparticles that transmit molecules from releasing cells to target cells. Recent studies link urinary EVs (uEV) to diverse processes such as infection and rejection after kidney transplantation. This, and the unmet need for biomarkers diagnosing kidney transplant dysfunction, has led to the current high level of interest in uEV. uEV provide non-intrusive access to local protein, DNA, and RNA analytics without invasive biopsy. To determine the added value of uEV measurements for detecting allograft dysfunction after kidney transplantation, we systematically included all related literature containing directly relevant information, with the addition of indirect evidence regarding urine or kidney injury without transplantation. According to their varying characteristics, uEV markers after transplantation could be categorized into kidney-specific, donor-specific, and immune response-related (IR-) markers. A few convincing studies have shown that kidney-specific markers (PODXL, ion cotransporters, SYT17, NGAL, and CD133) and IR-markers (CD3, multi-mRNA signatures, and viral miRNA) could diagnose rejection, BK virus-associated nephropathy, and calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity after kidney transplantation. In addition, some indirect proof regarding donor-specific markers (donor-derived cell-free DNA) in urine has been demonstrated. Together, this literature review provides directions for exploring novel uEV markers' profiling complications after kidney transplantation.

Early postoperative urinary MCP-1 as a potential biomarker predicting acute rejection in living donor kidney transplantation: a prospective cohort study.

We investigated the clinical relevance of urinary cytokines/chemokines reflecting intrarenal immunologic micromilieu as prognostic markers and the optimal measurement timing after living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT). This prospective cohort study included 77 LDKT patients who were followed for ≥ 5 years. Patients were divided into control (n = 42) or acute rejection (AR, n = 35) group. Early AR was defined as AR occurring within 3 months. Serum and urine cytokines/chemokines were measured serially as follows: intraoperative, 8/24/72 h, 1 week, 3 months, and 1 year after LDKT. Intrarenal total leukocytes, T cells, and B cells were analyzed with immunohistochemistry followed by tissueFAXS. Urinary MCP-1 and fractalkine were also analyzed in a validation cohort. Urinary MCP-1 after one week was higher in the AR group. Urinary MCP-1, fractalkine, TNF-α, RANTES, and IL-6 after one week were significantly higher in the early AR group. Intrarenal total leukocytes and T cells were elevated in the AR group compared with the control group. Urinary fractalkine, MCP-1, and IL-10 showed positive correlation with intrarenal leukocyte infiltration. Post-KT 1 week urinary MCP-1 showed predictive value in the validation cohort. One-week post-KT urinary MCP-1 may be used as a noninvasive diagnostic marker for predicting AR after LDKT.

Urinary cell mRNA profiling of kidney allograft recipients: A systematic investigation of a filtration based protocol for the simplification of urine processing.

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation is a life-restorative therapy, but immune rejection undermines allograft survival. Urinary cell mRNA profiles offer a noninvasive means of diagnosing kidney allograft rejection, but urine processing protocols have logistical constraints. We aimed to determine whether the centrifugation-based method for urinary cell mRNA profiling could be replaced with a simpler filtration-based method without undermining quality. METHODS: We isolated RNA from urine collected from kidney allograft recipients using the Cornell centrifugation-based protocol (CCBP) or the Zymo filter-based protocol (ZFBP) and compared RNA purity and yield using a spectrophotometer or a fluorometer and measured absolute copy number of transcripts using customized real-time quantitative PCR assays. We investigated the performance characteristics of RNA isolated using ZFBP and stored either at -80 °C or at ambient temperature for 2 to 4 days and also when shipped to our Gene Expression Monitoring (GEM) Core at ambient temperature. We examined the feasibility of initial processing of urine samples by kidney allograft recipients trained by the GEM Core staff and the diagnostic utility for acute rejection, of urine processed using the ZFBP. RESULTS: RNA purity (P = 0.0007, Wilcoxon matched paired signed-ranks test) and yield (P < 0.0001) were higher with ZFBP vs. CCBP, and absolute copy number of 18S rRNA was similar (P = 0.79) following normalization of RNA yield by reverse transcribing a constant amount of RNA isolated using either protocol. RNA purity, yield, and absolute copy numbers of 18S rRNA, TGF-ß1 mRNA and microRNA-26a were not different (P > 0.05) in the filtrates containing RNA stored either at -80 °C or at ambient temperature for 2 to 4 days or shipped overnight at ambient temperature. RNA purity, yield, and absolute copy numbers of 18S rRNA and TGF-ß1 mRNA were also not different (P > 0.05) between home processed and laboratory processed urine filtrates. Urinary cell levels of mRNA for granzyme B (P = 0.01) and perforin (P = 0.0002) in the filtrates were diagnostic of acute rejection in human kidney allografts. CONCLUSIONS: Urinary cell mRNA profiling was simplified using the ZFBP without undermining RNA quality or diagnostic utility. Home processing by the kidney allograft recipients, the stability of RNA containing filtrates at ambient temperature, and the elimination of the need for centrifuges and freezers represent some of the advantages of ZFBP over the CCBP for urinary cell mRNA profiling.

Meat intake and risk of mortality and graft failure in kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether meat intake is beneficial for long-term patient and graft survival in kidney transplant recipients (KTR). OBJECTIVES: We first investigated the association of the previously described meat intake biomarkers 1-methylhistidine and 3-methylhistidine with intake of white and red meat as estimated from a validated food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Second, we investigated the association of the meat intake biomarkers with long-term outcomes in KTR. METHODS: We measured 24-h urinary excretion of 1-methylhistidine and 3-methylhistidine by validated assays in a cohort of 678 clinically stable KTR. Cross-sectional associations were assessed by linear regression. We used Cox regression analyses to prospectively study associations of log2-transformed biomarkers with mortality and graft failure. RESULTS: Urinary 1-methylhistidine and 3-methylhistidine excretion values were median: 282; interquartile range (IQR): 132-598 µmol/24 h and median: 231; IQR: 175-306 µmol/24 h, respectively. Urinary 1-methylhistidine was associated with white meat intake [standardized ß (st ß): 0.20; 95% CI: 0.12, 0.28; P < 0.001], whereas urinary 3-methylhistidine was associated with red meat intake (st ß: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.23, 0.38; P < 0.001). During median follow-up for 5.4 (IQR: 4.9-6.1) y, 145 (21%) died and 83 (12%) developed graft failure. Urinary 3-methylhistidine was inversely associated with mortality independently of potential confounders (HR per doubling: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.42, 0.72; P < 0.001). Both urinary 1-methylhistidine and urinary 3-methylhistidine were inversely associated with graft failure independent of potential confounders (HR per doubling: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.73, 0.96; P = 0.01; and 0.59; 95% CI: 0.41, 0.85; P = 0.004, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: High urinary 3-methylhistidine, reflecting higher red meat intake, is independently associated with lower risk of mortality. High urinary concentrations of both 1- and 3-methylhistidine, of which the former reflects higher white meat intake, are independently associated with lower risk of graft failure in KTR. Future intervention studies are warranted to study the effect of high meat intake on mortality and graft failure in KTR, using these biomarkers.

Differentiating Acute Rejection From Preeclampsia After Kidney Transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical and laboratory characteristics in pregnancy that differentiate preeclampsia from acute renal allograft rejection and to investigate the maternal, neonatal, and graft sequelae of these diagnoses. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective case-controlled registry study of data abstracted from Transplant Pregnancy Registry International deliveries between 1968 and 2019. All adult kidney transplant recipients with singleton pregnancies of at least 20 weeks of gestation were included. Acute rejection was biopsy proven and preeclampsia was diagnosed based on contemporary criteria. Variables were compared using χ2, Fisher exact, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests as appropriate. Multivariable linear regression was used to analyze preterm birth. Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model were used to compare graft loss over time. RESULTS: There were 26 pregnant women with biopsy-confirmed acute rejection who were matched by the year they conceived to 78 pregnant women with preeclampsia. Recipients with acute rejection had elevated peripartum serum creatinine levels (73% vs 14%, P<.001), with median intrapartum creatinine of 3.90 compared with 1.15 mg/dL (P<.001). Conversely, only patients with preeclampsia had a significant increase in proteinuria from baseline. Although there were no significant differences in maternal outcomes, graft loss within 2 years postpartum (42% vs 10%) and long-term graft loss (73% vs 35%) were significantly increased in recipients who experienced acute rejection (P<.001 for both). The frequency of delivery before 32 weeks of gestation was 53% with acute rejection and 20% with preeclampsia. After controlling for hypertension and immunosuppressant use, acute rejection was associated with higher frequency of delivery at less than 32 weeks of gestation (adjusted odds ratio 4.04, 95% CI 1.10-15.2). CONCLUSION: In pregnancy, acute rejection is associated with higher creatinine levels, and preeclampsia is associated with increased proteinuria. Acute rejection in pregnancy carries a risk of prematurity and graft loss beyond that of preeclampsia for kidney transplant recipients. FUNDING SOURCE: The Transplant Pregnancy Registry International is supported in part by an educational grant from Veloxis Pharmaceuticals.

Urinary Cell mRNA Profiles Predictive of Human Kidney Allograft Status.

Immune monitoring of kidney allograft recipients and personalized therapeutics may help reach the aspirational goal of "one transplant for life." The invasive kidney biopsy procedure, the diagnostic tool of choice, has become safer and the biopsy classification more refined. Nevertheless, biopsy-associated complications, interobserver variability in biopsy specimen scoring, and costs continue to be significant concerns. The dynamics of the immune repertoire make frequent assessments of allograft status necessary, but repeat biopsies of the kidney are neither practical nor safe. To address the existing challenges, we developed urinary cell mRNA profiling and investigated the diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive accuracy of absolute levels of a hypothesis-based panel of mRNAs encoding immunoregulatory proteins. Enabled by our refinements of the PCR assay and by investigating mechanistic hypotheses, our single-center studies identified urinary cell mRNAs associated with T cell-mediated rejection, antibody-mediated rejection, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy, and BK virus nephropathy. In the multicenter National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials in Organ Transplantation-04, we discovered and validated a urinary cell three-gene signature of T-cell CD3 ε chain mRNA, interferon gamma inducible protein 10 (IP-10) mRNA, and 18s ribosomal RNA that is diagnostic of subclinical acute cellular rejection and acute cellular rejection and prognostic of acute cellular rejection and graft function. The trajectory of the signature score remained flat and below the diagnostic threshold for acute cellular rejection in the patients with no rejection biopsy specimens, whereas a sharp rise was observed during the weeks before the biopsy specimen that showed acute cellular rejection. Our RNA sequencing and bioinformatics identified kidney allograft biopsy specimen gene signatures of acute rejection to be enriched in urinary cells matched to acute rejection biopsy specimens. The urinary cellular landscape was more diverse and more enriched for immune cell types compared with kidney allograft biopsy specimens. Urinary cell mRNA profile-guided clinical trials are needed to evaluate their value compared with current standard of care.

Urinary vitronectin identifies patients with high levels of fibrosis in kidney grafts.

BACKGROUND: In kidney transplantation, fibrosis represents the final and irreversible consequence of the pathogenic mechanisms that lead to graft failure, and in the late stages it irremediably precedes the loss of renal function. The invasiveness of kidney biopsy prevents this condition from being frequently monitored, while clinical data are rather unspecific. The objective of this study was to find noninvasive biomarkers of kidney rejection. METHODS: We carried out proteomic analysis of the urinary Extracellular Vesicles (uEVs) from a cohort of kidney transplant recipients (n = 23) classified according to their biopsy-based diagnosis and clinical parameters as interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA), acute cellular rejection (ACR), calcineurin inhibitors toxicity (CNIT) and normal kidney function (NKF). RESULTS: Shotgun mass spectrometry of uEV-proteins identified differential expression of several proteins among these different groups. Up to 23 of these proteins were re-evaluated using targeted proteomics in a new independent cohort of patients (n = 41) classified in the same diagnostic groups. Among other results, we found a differential expression of vitronectin (VTN) in patients displaying chronic interstitial and tubular lesions (ci and ct mean > 2 according to Banff criteria). These results were further confirmed by a pilot study using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). CONCLUSION: Urinary vitronectin levels are a potential stand-alone biomarker to monitor fibrotic changes in kidney transplant recipients in a non-invasive fashion.

Biomarker implementation: Evaluation of the decision-making impact of CXCL10 testing in a pediatric cohort.

BACKGROUND: Children are at high risk for subclinical rejection, and kidney biopsy is currently used for surveillance. Our objective was to test how novel rejection biomarkers such as urinary CXCL10 may influence clinical decision-making to indicate need for a biopsy. METHODS: A minimum dataset for standard decision-making to indicate a biopsy was established by an expert panel and used to design clinical vignettes for use in a survey. Pediatric nephrologists were recruited to review the vignettes and A) estimate rejection risk and B) decide whether to biopsy; first without and then with urinary CXCL10/Cr level. Accuracy of biopsy decisions was then tested against the biopsy results. IRA was assessed by Fleiss Kappa (κ) for binary choice and ICC for probabilities. RESULTS: Eleven pediatric nephrologists reviewed 15 vignettes each. ICC of probability assessment for rejection improved from poor (0.28, P < .01) to fair (0.48, P < .01) with addition of CXCL10/Cr data. It did not, however, improve the IRA for decision to biopsy (K = 0.48 and K = 0.43, for the comparison). Change in clinician estimated probability of rejection with additional CXCL10/Cr data was correlated with CXCL10/Cr level (r2  = 0.7756, P < .0001). Decision accuracy went from 8/15 (53.3%) cases to 11/15 (73.3%) with CXCL10/Cr, although improvement did not achieve statistical significance. Using CXCL10/Cr alone would have been accurate in 12/15 cases (80%). CONCLUSION: There is high variability in decision-making on biopsy indication. Urinary CXCL10/Cr improves probability estimates for risk of rejection. Training may be needed to assist nephrologists in better integrate biomarker information into clinical decision-making.

Urinary nitrate concentration as a marker for kidney transplant rejection.

BACKGROUND: Early identification and treatment of kidney transplant rejection episodes is vital to limit loss of function and prolong the life of the transplanted kidney and recipient. Current practice depends on detecting a creatinine rise. A biomarker to diagnose transplant rejection at an earlier time point than current practice, or to inform earlier decision making to biopsy, could be transformative. It has previously been shown that urinary nitrate concentration is elevated in renal transplant rejection. Nitrate is a nitric oxide (NO) oxidation product. Transplant rejection upregulates NO synthesis via inducible nitric oxide synthase leading to elevations in urinary nitrate concentration. We have recently validated a urinary nitrate concentration assay which could provide results in a clinically relevant timeframe. Our aim was to determine whether urinary nitrate concentration is a useful tool to predict renal transplant rejection in the context of contemporary clinical practice. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study, recruiting renal transplant participants over an 18-month period. We made no alterations to the patients' clinical care including medications, immunosuppression, diet and frequency of visits. We collected urine samples from every clinical attendance. We assessed the urinary nitrate to creatinine ratio (uNCR) between patient groups: routine attendances, biopsy proven rejection, biopsy proven no rejection and other call backs. uNCR was examined over time for those with biopsy proven transplant rejection. These four groups were compared using an ANOVA test. RESULTS: A total of 2656 samples were collected. uNCR during biopsy proven rejection, n = 15 (median 49 µmol/mmol, IQR 23-61) was not significantly different from that of routine samples, n = 164 (median 55 µmol/mmol, IQR 37-82) (p = 0.55), or biopsy proven no rejection, n = 12 (median 39 µmol/mmol, IQR 21-89) (P = 0.77). Overall uNCR was highly variable with no diagnostic threshold for kidney transplant rejection. Furthermore, within-patient uNCR was highly variable over time, and thus it was not possible to produce individualised patient thresholds to identify rejection. The total taking Tacrolimus was 204 patients, with no statistical difference between the uNCR of all those on Tacrolimus, against those not, p = 0.18. CONCLUSION: The urinary nitrate to creatinine ratio is not a useful biomarker for renal transplant rejection.

Urinary Biomarkers for Diagnosis and Prediction of Acute Kidney Allograft Rejection: A Systematic Review.

Noninvasive tools for diagnosis or prediction of acute kidney allograft rejection have been extensively investigated in recent years. Biochemical and molecular analyses of blood and urine provide a liquid biopsy that could offer new possibilities for rejection prevention, monitoring, and therefore, treatment. Nevertheless, these tools are not yet available for routine use in clinical practice. In this systematic review, MEDLINE was searched for articles assessing urinary biomarkers for diagnosis or prediction of kidney allograft acute rejection published in the last five years (from January 1, 2015 to May 31, 2020). This review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Articles providing targeted or unbiased urine sample analysis for the diagnosis or prediction of both acute cellular and antibody-mediated kidney allograft rejection were included, analyzed, and graded for methodological quality with a particular focus on study design and diagnostic test accuracy measures. Urinary C-X-C motif chemokine ligands were the most promising and frequently studied biomarkers. The combination of precise diagnostic reference in training sets with accurate validation in real-life cohorts provided the most relevant results and exciting groundwork for future studies.

Point-of-Care Therapeutic Drug Monitoring for Precision Dosing of Immunosuppressive Drugs.

BACKGROUND: Immunosuppressive drugs (ISD) are an essential tool in the treatment of transplant rejection and immune-mediated diseases. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for determination of ISD concentrations in biological samples is an important instrument for dose personalization for improving efficacy while reducing side effects. While currently ISD concentration measurements are performed at specialized, centralized facilities, making the process complex and laborious for the patient, various innovative technical solutions have recently been proposed for bringing TDM to the point-of-care (POC). CONTENT: In this review, we evaluate current ISD-TDM and its value, limitations, and proposed implementations. Then, we discuss the potential of POC-TDM in the era of personalized medicine, and provide an updated review on the unmet needs and available technological solutions for the development of POC-TDM devices for ISD monitoring. Finally, we provide concrete suggestions for the generation of a meaningful and more patient-centric process for ISD monitoring. SUMMARY: POC-based ISD monitoring may improve clinical care by reducing turnaround time, by enabling more frequent measurements in order to obtain meaningful pharmacokinetic data (i.e., area under the curve) faster reaction in case of problems and by increasing patient convenience and compliance. The analysis of the ISD-TDM field prompts the evolution of POC testing toward the development of fully integrated platforms able to support clinical decision-making. We identify 4 major areas requiring careful combined implementation: patient usability, data meaningfulness, clinicians' acceptance, and cost-effectiveness.

Interleukin 8 Is Overexpressed in Acute Rejection in Kidney Transplant Patients.

The main complication associated with renal graft loss is immune rejection. The gold standard for the diagnosis of renal graft rejection is percutaneous renal biopsy, which is expensive and can lead to complications. Inflammation is one of the main pathogenic pathways in allograft rejection, and urine samples seem to be efficient windows to explore the allograft condition with a high cost-benefit ratio. This study aimed to evaluate the messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) profile expression pattern for interleukin (IL) 2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10; tumor necrosis factor alfa; gamma interferon; and transforming growth factor ß1 in the urine renal cells of patients with a diagnosis of humoral rejection and patients with a diagnosis of normal biopsy. METHODS: An observational, cross-sectional analytical study was performed. All kidney transplants were performed at the Organ Transplant Department between 2018 and 2019. Also, a healthy control with a normal blood test and no apparent infection was included. mRNA from urine samples and biopsies was isolated, and the expression of interleukins was analyzed in PCR real time. Data were analyzed by Shapiro-Wilk and Kruskal-Wallis tests. RESULTS: The proinflammatory IL expression pattern in urine samples of kidney rejection group showed overexpression for IL-8 (P = .0001). No differences were observed in the rest of the interleukins analyzed. When we compared the results in the rejected versus not rejected transplanted patients with a group of apparently healthy subjects, the difference remains consistent. Thus, mRNA of IL-8 could function as a diagnostic tool in cases of chronic damage secondary to fibrosis.

A Noninvasive Urine Metabolome Panel as Potential Biomarkers for Diagnosis of T Cell-Mediated Renal Transplant Rejection.

Acute T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) is a major complication after renal transplantation. TCMR diagnosis is very challenging and currently depends on invasive renal biopsy and nonspecific markers such as serum creatinine. A noninvasive metabolomics panel could allow early diagnosis and improved accuracy and specificity. We report, in this study, on urine metabolome changes in renal transplant recipients diagnosed with TCMR, with a view to future metabolomics-based diagnostics in transplant medicine. We performed urine metabolomic analyses in three study groups: (1) 7 kidney transplant recipients with acute TCMR, (2) 15 kidney transplant recipients without rejection but with impaired kidney function, and (3) 6 kidney transplant recipients with stable renal function, using 1H-nuclear magnetic resonance. Multivariate modeling of metabolites suggested a diagnostic panel where the diagnostic accuracy of each metabolite was calculated by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The impaired metabolic pathways associated with TCMR were identified by pathway analysis. In all, a panel of nine differential metabolites encompassing nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, 1-methylnicotinamide, cholesterol sulfate, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), nicotinic acid, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate, proline, spermidine, and alpha-hydroxyhippuric acid were identified as novel potential metabolite biomarkers of TCMR. Proline, spermidine, and GABA had the highest area under the curve (>0.7) and were overrepresented in the TCMR group. Nicotinate and nicotinamide metabolism was the most important pathway in TCMR. These findings call for clinical validation in larger study samples and suggest that urinary metabolomics warrants future consideration as a noninvasive research tool for TCMR diagnostic innovation.

New Markers for Transplant Rejection.

Monitoring allograft function after kidney transplant has routinely relied on the use of nonspecific markers, such as serum creatinine, glomerular filtration rate, proteinuria, and donor-specific antibodies. These traditional markers have low sensitivity and fail to detect subclinical changes. Diagnosis of renal allograft dysfunction still requires an allograft biopsy, as it remains the criterion standard for assessment of graft status. However, renal biopsy is an invasive procedure, and sampling errors may result in misdiagnosis, perhaps causing graft failure. New biomarkers have been developed to monitor allograft function, although many are not yet routinely used. Other shortcomings, such as lack of standardization and high cost, should be solved before their widespread application in the clinic. A recipient's immune status could be monitored by use of urine or blood samples. These include functional cell-based assays and the evaluation of molecular expression at the messenger RNA or protein levels. Molecular technologies, including molecular microscope diagnostic systems, have been recently developed to improve the yield of histologic evaluation of the allograft biopsy. Prospective, interventional trials are required to demonstrate whether these new biomarkers improve patient or transplant outcomes. Implementation of these technologies into standard clinical practice remains challenging until their generalizability, cost, ease of interpretation, and the identification of patients who may benefit from more than standard-of-care surveillance can be determined. These biomarkers could allow immunosuppressive therapy to be individualized for patients.

Kidney transplant monitoring by urinary flow cytometry: Biomarker combination of T cells, renal tubular epithelial cells, and podocalyxin-positive cells detects rejection.

Creatinine and proteinuria are used to monitor kidney transplant patients. However, renal biopsies are needed to diagnose renal graft rejection. Here, we assessed whether the quantification of different urinary cells would allow non-invasive detection of rejection. Urinary cell numbers of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, monocytes/macrophages, tubular epithelial cells (TEC), and podocalyxin(PDX)-positive cells were determined using flow cytometry and were compared to biopsy results. Urine samples of 63 renal transplant patients were analyzed. Patients with transplant rejection had higher amounts of urinary T cells than controls; however, patients who showed worsening graft function without rejection had similar numbers of T cells. T cells correlated with histological findings (interstitial inflammation p = 0.0005, r = 0.70; tubulitis p = 0.006, r = 0.58). Combining the amount of urinary T cells and TEC, or T cells and PDX+ cells, yielded a significant segregation of patients with rejection from patients without rejection (all p < 0.01, area under the curve 0.89-0.91). Urinary cell populations analyzed by flow cytometry have the potential to introduce new monitoring methods for kidney transplant patients. The combination of urinary T cells, TEC, and PDX-positive cells may allow non-invasive detection of transplant rejection.