Dorsal Approach Combined with In Situ Split for Laparoscopic Segment 7 Resection.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic segment 7 resection has been a technically challenging procedure (Li et al. in J Gastrointest Surg 23:1084-1085, 2019). We introduce a dorsal approach with in situ split for laparoscopic segment 7 resection. PATIENT AND METHODS: The patient was a 26-year-old male diagnosed with hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia located in segment 7. The lesion, measuring approximately 6.7 cm × 5.7 cm, was close to the right caudate lobe. Firstly, the segment 7 pedicle was exposed through the Rouviere's groove combined with caudate lobe-first approach, followed by clipping to confirm demarcation. Peripheral parenchymal transection at the dorsal side started and the intersegmental vein between segments 6 and 7 was found. Dissection of this vein towards its root proceeded preferentially at the dorsal side. Then the segment 7 pedicle was cut off, followed by parenchymal transection toward the cranial side to find the trunk of the compressed right hepatic vein (RHV). It was further dissociated from the trunk to periphery, exposing and cutting off its branches draining segment 7. The remaining parenchyma at the cranioventral side was subsequently separated along the exposed RHV. Finally, the resection of segment 7 was accomplished by dividing the right perihepatic ligaments. RESULTS: The operative time was 395 min with the estimated blood loss of 500 ml. The patient did not receive perioperative blood transfusion. The patient was discharged on tenth postoperative day following suture removal without experiencing any postoperative bleeding, hepatic failure, or other complications. CONCLUSION: Dorsal approach combined with in situ split for laparoscopic segment 7 resection is feasible and has certain advantages (Cao et al. in Surg Endosc 35:174-181, 2021; Liu et al. in Surg Oncol 38:101575, 2021; Yang et al. in Surg Endosc 37:1334-1341, 2023). Further investigations are required due to some limitations.

The Inter-Laennec Approach for Liver Tumors in Contact with Hepatic Veins in Laparoscopic Liver Resection.

BACKGROUND: Patients with liver tumors that are in contact with the major hepatic veins may require hepatic vein resection to achieve an adequate surgical margin; however, the potential for venous congestion and impaired remnant liver function must be considered. We introduce the anatomy of the hepatic vein related to Laennec's capsule as well as the surgical techniques to overcome these limitations in the laparoscopic approach.1,2 PATIENTS AND METHODS: A patient with hepatocellular carcinoma underwent resection of the paracaval portion of the caudate lobe. A 4.5-cm tumor was located on the hepatic hilum, compressing the middle and right hepatic veins (MHV and RHV). The Laennec's capsule around the hepatic veins consists of cardiac and hepatic layers. In the inter-Laennec approach, the hepatic veins and inferior vena cava were continuously exposed from the root side, during entry into the space between the hepatic and cardiac Laennec's capsules.3,4 Hence, the cardiac Laennec's capsule was preserved on the venous side, and the strength of the hepatic vein walls was maintained without exposing the tumor. Parenchymal transection was performed while preserving the MHV and RHV. RESULTS: The operative time was 331 min, with minimal estimated blood loss. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 6 without complications. A pathological examination revealed the presence of focal capsular invasion; however, the surgical margin was maintained by leaving the hepatic Laennec's capsule on the tumor side. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the structure of the Laennec's capsule can contribute to the establishment of safe and feasible liver resection techniques.

Ante Situm Liver Resection for Tumors Invading the Inferior Vena Cava Hepatic Vein Confluence.

BACKGROUND: Liver malignancy invading the retrohepatic inferior vena cava beyond the cavo-hepatic vein venous confluence can be resected by an ante situm technique first described by Hannoun et al.1 In this approach, a major hepatectomy is performed and the hepatic veins are sectioned to allow the inferior vena cava reconstruction while the liver is cold perfused and the liver remains within the abdominal cavity. The hepatic vein is then reimplanted on the reconstructed inferior vena cava in "a liver autotransplantation fashion." PATIENT AND METHODS: The patient was a 66-year-old with a recurrent adrenocortical carcinoma cancer invading the right liver and the retrohepatic inferior vena cava with intraluminal thrombus extending beyond to the hepatic vein confluence. A right hepatectomy extended to segment 1 and the retrohepatic inferior vena cava was planned because of the intracaval tumoral thrombus and the infiltration of the right liver. The future liver remnant (FLR) (646 cc) to total liver volume (1526 cc) ratios was 42% while the FLR to patient weight ratio was 0.9%. RESULTS: The parenchymal liver transection was performed under a total vascular exclusion, venovenous bypass, and hypothermic perfusion of the left liver.2 The common trunk of the left and middle hepatic veins was sectioned, allowing the liver to be rotated toward the left. Vena cava reconstruction was achieved by a ringed Gore-Tex prosthesis, with reimplantation of the left and middle hepatic veins directly over the prosthesis. Surgery lasted 580 min, total duration of venovenous bypass and liver vascular exclusion was 143 min and 140 min, respectively. Blood loss was 2 liters and 8 red blood cell (RBC) units were transfused. The patient spent 5 days in the ICU, liver function tests normalized by postoperative day 8 and patient was discharged home on postoperative day 20; 1 year later, the patient is alive and disease free under mitotane treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The ante situm technique represents a safe surgical option for complex liver resection for malignancy involving the cavo-hepatic venous confluence. Compared with the ex situ liver resection, this technique allows liver remnant outflow reconstruction to be performed while the liver is cold perfused within the abdominal cavity with an intact hepatic pedicle.

Laparoscopic Extended Segmentectomy VIII Guided by Three-Dimensional Reconstruction and Hepatic Veins with a Cranio-Caudal Approach.

INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive resection of segment VIII is a technically challenging procedure, made even more challenging when the resection is extended to segment IV and/or segment VII. Parenchymal-sparing resections are frequently used in the management of liver metastases but expose to the risk of R1 resection, especially with a minimally invasive approach. Preoperative surgical planning with 3D reconstruction and intraoperative guidance with hepatic vein is helpful for laparoscopic oncological liver resection.1-3 PATIENT AND METHODS: We present the case of a 58-year-old female with three metachronous liver metastases from epidermoid anal cancer. The disease was stable 6 months after cessation of chemotherapy. Metastases were mainly located in segment VIII (with a large segment VIII dorsal) but also in the territory of glissonian pedicles from segments IV and VII. Prior to surgery, three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction showed that a segmentectomy VIII would not be sufficient to have a safety margin and showed the relation between metastases and hepatic veins. Transection of the liver was performed with an ultrasonic dissector. Exposure of the hepatic veins was performed by gently pulling of the hepatic tissue from the vein, using the nonactive blade of the ultrasonic device. Activation of ultrasonic energy was performed only for sealing and dividing small collateral veins. Three transection lines were necessary. The posterior transection line, in segment VII, was determined with intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS), at 1 cm below the metastasis. The liver was transected superficially only. The medial transection line, in segment IV, was determined with IOUS, at 1 cm on the left of the metastasis, parallel to the middle hepatic vein. Finally, the inferior transection line, between segment V and segment VIII, was approximately determined with IOUS, vertically aligned with the hepatic vein of segment V. The transection line was further corrected after clamping the glissonian pedicle of segment VIII, according to fluorescence. The surgical procedure began with the mobilization of the right liver, including division of the hepato-caval ligament, followed by the superficial transection of the posterior margin in segment VII. Then, transection of segment IV was performed near the termination of the middle hepatic vein, which was further exposed with a cranio-caudal approach to minimize the risk of vein injury. The hepatic vein of segment V was then used as a landmark for the identification of the Glissonian pedicle of segment VIII, which was transected.4 Termination of the right hepatic vein (RHV) was then identified, and the ventral branch of the RHV was transected. The dorsal branch of the RHV was exposed with a cranio-caudal approach. Finally, transection of segment VII was performed toward the transection line made initially. RESULTS: Operative time was 360 min with 450 mL blood loss. The Pringle maneuver was used during 148 min. The patient was discharged on the seventh postoperative day. Pathological examination confirmed R0 resection, with 20-60% necrosis of the three liver metastases. The resected liver weight was 225 g. Six months after liver resection, the patient had a recurrence in a celiac lymph node, which was treated by radiotherapy. Fifteen months after liver resection, the patient is free of disease without active treatment. CONCLUSION: Preoperative virtual hepatectomy facilitates surgical planning by increasing the understanding of the tumors-vessels relationship. Intraoperative hepatic vein guidance with a cranio-caudal approach enables to follow preoperative surgical planning and to perform safe complex laparoscopic liver resection.

Histologic Findings of Sinusoidal Dilatation and Congestion in Liver Grafts Do Not Correlate with Hepatic Venous Anastomotic Gradients.

PURPOSE: Hepatic venous transplant anastomotic pressure gradient measurement and transjugular liver biopsy are commonly used in clinical decision-making in patients with suspected anastomotic hepatic venous outflow obstruction. This investigation aimed to determine if sinusoidal dilatation and congestion on histology are predictive of hepatic venous anastomotic outflow obstruction, and if it can help select patients for hepatic vein anastomosis stenting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective study of 166 transjugular liver biopsies in 139 patients obtained concurrently with transplant venous anastomotic pressure gradient measurement. Demographic characteristics, laboratory parameters, procedure and clinical data, and histology of time-zero allograft biopsies were analyzed. RESULTS: No relationship was found between transplant venous anastomotic pressure gradient and sinusoidal dilatation and congestion (P = 0.92). Logistic regression analysis for sinusoidal dilatation and congestion confirmed a significant relationship with reperfusion/preservation injury and/or necrosis of the allograft at time-zero biopsy (OR 6.6 [1.3-33.1], P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: There is no relationship between histologic sinusoidal dilatation and congestion and liver transplant hepatic vein anastomotic gradient. In this study group, sinusoidal dilatation and congestion is a nonspecific histopathologic finding that is not a reliable criterion to select patients for venous anastomosis stenting.

Liver Resection Under Total Hepatic Vascular Exclusion with In Situ Hypothermic Isolated Hepatic Perfusion for Advanced Liver Tumors.

PURPOSE: Continuous dissection or simultaneous reconstruction of the hepatic vein (HV) and inferior vena cava (IVC) was achieved under total hepatic vascular exclusion (THVE) with in situ hypothermic isolated hepatic perfusion (HIHP) in two cases. CASE 1: The patient previously underwent liver resections with the right HV for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). This time, the CRLM had invaded the left HV and IVC, and five courses of FOLFILI plus ramucirumab were given, resulting in stable disease. Due to expected high HV pressure, liver parenchymal transection was started under THVE. Sub-segmentectomy with patch graft plasty of the IVC and reconstruction of the left HV using a jugular vein graft were performed under THVE and HIHP. This patient died at home 3 months after surgery; the cause of death was unknown. CASE 2: Hepatocellular carcinoma in the caudate lobe was in extensive contact with the roots of three main HVs and the IVC, and pressed the hepatocaval confluence, with high HV pressure expected. In addition, tumor thrombosis extended to both the main portal vein and the common bile duct, resulting in the inability to introduce chemotherapy. After tumor thrombectomy, liver parenchymal transection was started under THVE. Extended left hepatectomy with wedge resection, and primary suture of the right HV and IVC was performed under THVE and HIHP. Recurrence-free and overall survivals were 8 months (lung metastasis) and 31 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In liver resection for liver tumors located in the hepatocaval confluence, THVE with HIHP is useful for ensuring the safety.

Dorsal approach in laparoscopic extended left hemi-hepatectomy: A case series.

RATIONALE: The utility of the dorsal approach has been reported for laparoscopic left hemi-hepatectomy. PATIENT CONCERNS: The aim of the present study is to show the usefulness of the dorsal approach for laparoscopic extended left-hemi-hepatectomy while ensuring safe identification of hepatic veins and dissection of the dorsal tumor margin. DIAGNOSES: Tumors requiring extended left hemi-hepatectomy. INTERVENTIONS: After mobilization of the lateral sector and division of the Arantius plate, parenchyma above the Arantius plate is removed to expose the root of the middle hepatic vein and left hepatic vein. Each of these veins can be isolated separately either intra- or extra-hepatically. After removing the parenchyma on the cranial side of the left Glissonean pedicle continuous with the exposed hepatic veins, the left Glissonean pedicle is isolated using the Glissonean pedicle transection method. After division of the left hepatic vein and Glissonean pedicle, segment 4 (in which the main part of the tumor is commonly located) is dissected from the anterior plane of the paracaval portion of the caudate lobe by the dorsal approach, along with the hepatic hilum. Following dissection of the dorsal side of the tumor, and division of parenchyma from the anterior edge of the liver, the anterior Glissonean branches and middle hepatic vein are divided safely and the specimen is resected. OUTCOMES: Three patients underwent laparoscopic extended left hemi-hepatectomy, with no open conversions. Operative time and blood loss were 331 (concomitant with another partial hepatectomy), 277, and 315 minutes; and 200, 100, and 100 g, respectively. The postoperative courses were uneventful. LESSONS: The dorsal approach maximizes the advantages of laparoscopic extended left hemi-hepatectomy and can be performed safely.

Ex vivo resection, vessel reconstruction and liver autotransplantation for cholangiocarcinoma: A report of two cases.

PURPOSE: Ex vivo liver resection and autotransplantation (ERAT) can be used to treat locally advanced tumors that are conventionally unresectable. Because the procedure is rare, there are very few reports in the literature. Recently, we performed ERAT for two cases of cholangiocarcinoma invading caudate lobe, the retrohepatic vena cava and hepatic veins, and investigated technical variations of this procedure. METHODS: One patient was a 57-year-old man with liver caudate lobe metastasis from cholangiocarcinoma after pancreaticoduodenal resection five years ago, and the other patient was a 68-year-old man with caudate lobe cholangiocarcinoma. Both cases were considered to be unresectable by conventional resection due to the critical invasion of the retrohepatic vena cava along with the three hepatic veins. Therefore, ERAT was indicated in these two cases. RESULTS: The liver along with the retrohepatic vena cava was removed, which was replaced by GORE-TEX synthetic artificial vessel grafts with angioplasty to reconstruct the inferior vena cava (IVC), and the GORE-TEX synthetic artificial vessel anastomosed to the right auricular appendage or the IVC to build the continuity of the IVC. Ex vivo caudate lobe hepatectomy was performed, along with the retrohepatic vena cava and hepatic veins, and subsequently the reconstruction outflow of hepatic venous was established using cold-preserved allogeneic vessels and falciform ligament. Finally, remnant of the liver was implanted by Piggyback liver transplantation. The hepatic vein, portal vein, hepatic artery and bile duct were anastomosed, and autotransplantation of the liver was completed. The patients were followed-up for 18 months and showed good liver function, with no recurrence of cancer. CONCLUSIONS: ERAT should be considered as a therapeutic option for selected patients with cholangiocarcinoma invading caudate lobe, the retrohepatic vena cava and hepatic veins. It is crucial to reconstruct the outflow of hepatic venous according to different situations.

Double hepatic vein reconstruction during extended anatomical resection of segment 8 for colorectal liver metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic vein reconstruction (HVR) is occasionally necessary for resecting hepatic malignancies to ensure surgical margins while preserving remnant liver function [1]. Reports of multiple HVR are rare due to the highly technical demanding procedure and high risk of morbidity [2]. We introduce our procedure of double HVR for metastatic liver tumors invading the right hepatic vein (RHV) and middle hepatic vein (MHV). METHODS: The patient was a 66-year-old man with colorectal liver metastasis in segment 8, invading RHV and MHV. Due to impaired liver function, extended right hemihepatectomy was unsuitable. Thus, extended anatomical resection of segment 8 with double HVR was performed. The liver was completely mobilized and the RHV and MHV were secured. After liver parenchyma dissection, the specimen was connected by RHV and MHV (Fig. 1). The MHV was dissected and reconstructed using a right superficial femoral vein graft while the RHV remained connected [3]. Reconstruction of the MHV was performed on the posterior wall of the proximal side, followed by the anterior wall, using 4-point supporting threads. Anastomosis was performed by the over-and-over suture method. On the distal side, two-point supporting threads were applied. After specimen removal, the RHV was resected and reconstructed in the same manner using a left internal jugular vein graft [4]. RESULTS: The patient was discharged on postoperative day 14 with no signs of liver failure. Computed tomography performed six months after surgery revealed no graft occlusion (Fig. 2). CONCLUSION: In appropriately selected patients, this technique may be a useful option for preserving the remnant liver function.

A patient alive without disease 32 months after conversion surgery following lenvatinib treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma with a tumor thrombus originating in the middle hepatic vein and reaching the right atrium via the suprahepatic vena cava: a case report.

Conversion surgery for initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma appears to be increasing in incidence since the advent of new molecular target drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors; however, reports on long-term outcomes are limited and the prognostic relevance of this treatment strategy remains unclear. Herein, we report the case of a 75-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma, 108 mm in diameter, accompanied by a tumor thrombus in the middle hepatic vein that extended to the right atrium via the suprahepatic vena cava. He underwent conversion surgery after preceding lenvatinib treatment and is alive without disease 51 months after the commencement of treatment and 32 months after surgery. Just before conversion surgery, after 19 months of lenvatinib treatment, the main tumor had reduced in size to 72 mm in diameter, the tip of the tumor thrombus had receded back to the suprahepatic vena cava, and the tumor thrombus vascularity was markedly reduced. The operative procedure was an extended left hepatectomy with concomitant middle hepatic vein resection. The tumor thrombus was removed under total vascular exclusion via incision of the root of the middle hepatic vein. Histopathological examination revealed that more than half of the liver tumor and the tumor thrombus were necrotic.

Pure Laparoscopic Anatomic Resection of Liver Segment 4 with Middle Hepatic Vein Involvement Using Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Staining.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic anatomic resection of liver segment 4 is a technically challenging operation, which is rarely reported owing to the difficulty of defining the demarcation of a hepatic segment 4 on a monitor.1 The portal territory staining method is technically feasible to identify tumors and segment boundaries during hepatectomy.2 Herein, we describe the laparoscopic hepatectomy of segment 4 using the fluorescent-positive staining method. METHODS: A 72-year-old man recurred colorectal liver metastases after colectomy, positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) showed metastases located in segment 4 with involvement of the middle hepatic vein (MHV) and caudate lobe; no other organ metastasis or recurrence occurred. We performed an anatomical hepatectomy 4 with MHV and parenchymal resection of segment 1 (H1'/4-MHV).3 The key point of the procedure was dividing and clamping Glisson's branches for segment 2 and segment 3 using the hepatic round ligament approach; the G2 and G3 were dissected along the right side of round ligament via the extrahepatic Glissonian approach, then the left hepatic artery (LHA) was divided and injected with ICG in the left portal vein (LPV). Finally, transection was performed along the fluorescent stain location line and ischemic demarcation line. RESULTS: The operation time was 263 min; the Pringle lasted 110 min, and the estimated blood loss was 400 g. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 5 without complications. Sigmoid carcinoma and R0 margin were confirmed by histopathology. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy 4 with middle hepatic vein invasion using indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence staining is a feasible and effective technique.

Laparoscopic Liver Tunnel for Tumors at the Hepatocaval Confluence.

BACKGROUND: Tumors at the hepatocaval confluence can be treated with parenchyma-sparing surgery, also with minimally invasive approach.1,2 The "Liver Tunnel" was described for tumors involving the paracaval portion of Sg1 in contact or infiltrating the middle hepatic vein (MHV).3 A "Liver Tunnel" with laparoscopic approach is proposed. METHODS: A 48-year-old woman was referred for three synchronous colorectal liver metastases in the paracaval portion of Sg1 in contact with the inferior vena cava and the MHV, in Sg8 ventral and in Sg6, after an urgent left laparoscopic hemicolectomy for an obstructing carcinoma. A laparoscopic Sg1 resection extended to Sg8 ventral were planned after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Estimated future liver remnant (FLR) was 75% (840 ml) of healthy liver (Fig. 1). In case of right hepatectomy extended to Sg1, estimated FLR was 25% (280 ml) of healthy liver. Fig. 1 3D reconstruction and intraoperative images of Liver Tunnel (A) and Sg6 resection (B). Total liver volume: 1110 ml. Total resected liver volume 270 ml: Liver Tunnel 93 ml; Sg6 177 ml. Liver volumes were measured with HA3D™ technology with Medics3D software (Medics3D, Turin, Italy) RESULTS: Pneumoperitoneum is established, and four operative ports are placed. Sg1 is approached from the left, dividing the Glissonean pedicles and short hepatic veins. MHV is approached cranio-caudally from the dorsal side. The resection continues on the ventral side, according to our "Ultrasound Liver Map technique" with a cranio-caudal approach to the MHV.4 Sg8 ventral pedicles are divided and the resection completed with aid of indocyanine green negative staining. A Sg6 resection is then performed. Operative time was 480 min. Blood loss was 100 ml. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged on fourth postoperative day. The two parenchyma-sparing resections saved an estimated volume of 75% (840 ml) of healthy liver (Fig. 1). The estimated remnant liver volume after a right hepatectomy extended to Sg1 would have been only 25%. CONCLUSIONS: Tumors at the hepatocaval confluence involving Sg1 can be removed with the "Liver Tunnel," which can be performed with minimally invasive approach. The "Laparoscopic Liver Tunnel" pushes further the limit of minimally invasive parenchyma-sparing surgery for ill-located tumors with complex vascular relationship.

Buddi-Chiari syndrome associated with hypereosinophilic syndrome: A case report.

RATIONALE: Budd-Chiari Syndrome (BCS) is a relatively rare clinical disorder with a wide range of symptoms, caused by the obstruction of the hepatic venous outflow. The etiology and pathogenesis of BCS vary in different countries and regions. In Western countries, hepatic venous obstruction is the most common type, and its main cause is closely related to the hypercoagulable state of the body. Inferior vena cava obstruction is common in Asia, and its etiology progresses slowly due to the lack of epidemiological data. [3] Here, we report a rare case of BCS associated with the hypereosinophilic syndrome and discuss the possible causal relationship between the two. PATIENT CONCERNS: The patient was a 33-year-old female with intermittent epistaxis, gum bleeding, and excessive menstrual flow for the past 6 months. The routine blood tests showed elevated levels of eosinophils, and the liver function test showed mildly elevated levels of γ-glutamyl transpeptidase and alkaline phosphatase, and abdominal ultrasound showed hepatosplenomegaly and suspicion of intrahepatic arteriovenous or arteriovenous-portal fistula. DIAGNOSES: Finally, through the improvement of bone marrow aspiration, digital subtraction angiography and gene detection, the diagnosis of BCS combined with hypereosinophilic syndrome was confirmed, and JAK2V617F mutation was highly associated with it. INTERVENTIONS: The patient received endovascular stent implantation and regular oral rivaroxaban anticoagulation therapy after operation. OUTCOMES: Seven months later, enhanced computed tomography (CT) of the hepatobiliary showed that the hepatic bruise-like changes were significantly reduced compared with before, and the right hepatic vein and the right perihepatic vein stent were left in place with a good filling of contrast in the stent. LESSONS: The patient, in this case, was finally diagnosed with BCS combined with hypereosinophilic syndrome, and to our knowledge, such case reports are rare. Our case report suggest an association between BCS and hypereosinophilic syndrome, but relevant studies are minimal, we hope to conduct larger and higher quality studies on these patients in the future, to provide new directions and basis for the etiology and pathogenesis of these diseases, as well as provide new targets and ideas for clinical treatment.

Microanatomical organization of hepatic venous lymphatic system in humans.

Lymphatic fluid drains from the liver via the periportal lymphatic, hepatic venous lymphatic, and superficial lymphatic systems. We performed a postmortem study to clarify the three-dimensional structure and flow dynamics of the human hepatic venous lymphatic system, as it still remains unclear. Livers were excised whole from three human cadavers, injected with India ink, and sliced into 1-cm sections from which veins were harvested. The distribution of lymphatic vessels was observed in 5 µm sections immunostained for lymphatic and vascular markers (podoplanin and CD31, respectively) using light microscopy. Continuity and density of lymphatic vessel distribution were assessed in en-face whole-mount preparations of veins using stereomicroscopy. The structure of the external hepatic vein wall was assessed with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The lymphatic dynamics study suggested that lymphatic fluid flows through an extravascular pathway around the central and sublobular veins. A lymphatic vessel network originates in the wall of sublobular veins, with a diameter greater than 110 µm, and the peripheral portions of hepatic veins and continues to the inferior vena cava. The density distribution of lymphatic vessels is smallest in the peripheral portion of the hepatic vein (0.03%) and increases to the proximal portion (0.22%, p = 0.012) and the main trunk (1.01%, p < 0.001), correlating positively with increasing hepatic vein diameter (Rs = 0.67, p < 0.001). We revealed the three-dimensional structure of the human hepatic venous lymphatic system. The results could improve the understanding of lymphatic physiology and liver pathology.

Upper Transversal Hepatectomy with Two Hepatic Veins Reconstruction: Combining Parenchymal-Sparing Liver Surgery with Transplantation Techniques for Colorectal Liver Metastases.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) involving two or three main hepatic veins pose a surgical challenge. For these lesions, compelled surgical strategies have usually included major and/or extended liver resections according to the two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) strategy. More recently, a one-stage transversal hepatectomy resecting the posterosuperior liver segment (7,8,4 superior) along with one or more hepatic veins has been described, such as showed herein in a didactical video. METHODS: The patient is a 78-year-old woman with two large CRLMs located into segment 2 and into segment 8. Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography showed tumour stability after chemotherapy. The lesion of segment 2 is close to the left hepatic vein while the lesion of segment 8 infiltrates the middle (MHV) and the right hepatic veins (RHV). RESULTS: Under intermittent pedicular clamping, resection of the segment 7, 8, 4 superior along with the right and middle hepatic veins is performed. Reconstruction of the veins was performed with 2 cryopreserved autologous saphenous grafts. Postoperative course was uneventful and postoperative CT scan showed patency of the two venous graft reconstructions. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery for CRLM has evolved over the last two decades shifting from large anatomical resections to parenchymal-sparing resections. Sparing liver parenchyma allows surgical radicality while reducing the risk of liver failure and allowing repeated liver resection. Associating vascular reconstruction to parenchymal-sparing surgery reduces the risk of venous congestion of the spared liver parenchyma.

Extreme In Situ Liver Surgery Under Total Vascular Exclusion with Right Hepatic Vein and Inferior Vena Cava Grafts for an Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

In this multimedia article, we demonstrate an extreme in situ liver surgery under total vascular exclusion with right hepatic vein and inferior vena cava grafts for an intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in a centre with experience in highly complex hepatobiliary surgery and liver transplantation. This surgical approach after neoadjuvant chemotherapy provides an opportunity for surgical salvage in patients with large tumors invading the hepatocaval confluence. This patient was considered unresectable at another hospital and referred to our unit. We performed an accurate preoperative assessment with new generation 3D modelling to plan the type of vascular reconstruction that would allow adequate hepatic venous outflow and the volume of the future liver remnant sufficient to avoid postoperative liver failure. For hemodynamic management of the patient, we performed a total hepatic vascular exclusion with veno-venous bypass without intraoperative adverse events. We used a cryopreserved carotid artery graft after previously planning the most appropriate diameter and length for right hepatic vein reconstruction. The inferior vena cava was reconstructed with gore-tex graft. During the hospital stay there were no postoperative complications. The patient is free of disease. We conclude that patients with advanced malignant liver disease should always be referred to highly specialized liver surgery centers to assess the most appropriate oncological management and the possibility of surgical resectability.

Simultaneous portal and hepatic vein embolization is better than portal embolization or ALPPS for hypertrophy of future liver remnant before major hepatectomy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is the Achilles' heel of hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases. The most commonly used procedure to generate hypertrophy of the functional liver remnant (FLR) is portal vein embolization (PVE), which does not always lead to successful hypertrophy. Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) has been proposed to overcome the limitations of PVE. Liver venous deprivation (LVD), a technique that includes simultaneous portal and hepatic vein embolization, has also been proposed as an alternative to ALPPS. The present study aimed to conduct a systematic review as the first network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of the three regenerative techniques. DATA SOURCES: A systematic search for literature was conducted using the electronic databases Embase, PubMed (MEDLINE), Google Scholar and Cochrane. RESULTS: The time to operation was significantly shorter in the ALPPS cohort than in the PVE and LVD cohorts by 27 and 22 days, respectively. Intraoperative parameters of blood loss and the Pringle maneuver demonstrated non-significant differences between the PVE and LVD cohorts. There was evidence of a significantly higher FLR hypertrophy rate in the ALPPS cohort when compared to the PVE cohort, but non-significant differences were observed when compared to the LVD cohort. Notably, the LVD cohort demonstrated a significantly better FLR/body weight (BW) ratio compared to both the ALPPS and PVE cohorts. Both the PVE and LVD cohorts demonstrated significantly lower major morbidity rates compared to the ALPPS cohort. The LVD cohort also demonstrated a significantly lower 90-day mortality rate compared to both the PVE and ALPPS cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: LVD in adequately selected patients may induce adequate and profound FLR hypertrophy before major hepatectomy. Present evidence demonstrated significantly lower major morbidity and mortality rates in the LVD cohort than in the ALPPS and PVE cohorts.

Complications in hepatic vein catheterisation and transjugular liver biopsy.

INTRODUCTION: Portal pressure predicts the occurrence of decompensations in cirrhosis. Portal pressure is primarily measured via hepatic vein catheterisation (HVC), to which a transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB) may be added. Indications for HVC are mainly therapy control and prognosis. TJLB is performed when a percutaneous liver biopsy is contraindicated or for other diagnostic reasons. Both procedures have reported low complication rates. The aim of this study was to identify indications and 30-day postprocedural complications. METHODS: Based on procedure codes, a list was generated in the report database compromising procedures from 1 January 2018 to 31 January 2022. Procedures were identified in electronic charts (Cosmic Arkiv). A total of 209 patients undergoing 277 procedures were included. Information regarding indications, complications, age, sex, diagnosis, comorbidity and blood tests was also analysed. RESULTS: The more frequently reported indications for HVC were control of betablockers and diagnosis. Indications for TJLB were diagnostic and research purposes. Complications after HVC included pain and transient supraventricular arrythmias. Four major complications after TJLB were found, which led to admission due to various causes of bleeding. CONCLUSION: HVC and TJLB are safe procedures. The complication rate for HVC and TJLB was 3.3% and 6.8%, respectively. Complications were minor; only four major complications after TJLB were found - none of which were mortal. FUNDING: None. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not relevant.