ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The UK is experiencing its highest rate of drug related deaths in 25 years. Poor and inconsistent access to healthcare negatively impacts health outcomes for people who use drugs. Innovation in models of care which promote access and availability of physical treatment is fundamental. Heroin Assisted Treatment (HAT) is a treatment modality targeted at the most marginalised people who use drugs, at high risk of mortality and morbidity. The first service-provider initiated HAT service in the UK ran between October 2019 and November 2022 in Middlesbrough, England. The service was co-located within a specialist primary care facility offering acute healthcare treatment alongside injectable diamorphine. METHODS: Analysis of anonymised health records for healthcare costs (not including drug treatment) took place using descriptive statistics prior and during engagement with HAT, at both three (n=15) and six (n=12) months. Primary outcome measures were incidents of wound care, skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs), overdose (OD) events, unplanned overnight stays in hospital, treatment engagement (general and within hospital care settings) and ambulance incidents. Secondary outcome measures were costs associated with these events. RESULTS: A shift in healthcare access for participants during HAT engagement was observed. HAT service attendance appeared to support health promoting preventative care, and reduce reactive reliance on emergency healthcare systems. At three and six months, engagement for preventative wound care and treatment for SSTIs increased at the practice. Unplanned emergency healthcare interactions for ODs, overnight hospital stays, serious SSTIs, and ambulance incidents reduced, and there was an increase in treatment engagement (i.e. a reduction in appointments which were not engaged with). There was a decrease in treatment engagement in hospital settings. Changes in healthcare utilisation during HAT translated to a reduction in healthcare costs of 58% within six months compared to the same timeframe from the period directly prior to commencing HAT. CONCLUSION: This exploratory study highlights the potential for innovative harm reduction interventions such as HAT, co-located with primary care services, to improve healthcare access and engagement for a high-risk population. Increased uptake of primary healthcare services translated to reductions in emergency healthcare use and associated costs. Although costs of HAT provision are substantial, the notable cost-savings in health care should be an important consideration in service implementation planning.
Subject(s)
Health Care Costs , Health Services Accessibility , Heroin Dependence , Primary Health Care , Humans , Primary Health Care/economics , Heroin Dependence/economics , Heroin Dependence/therapy , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Female , Male , Adult , United Kingdom , Heroin/economics , Heroin/administration & dosage , Drug Overdose/prevention & control , Middle Aged , Delivery of Health Care/economics , England , Opiate Substitution Treatment/economicsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: People who inject drugs often get bacterial infections. Few longitudinal studies have reported the incidence and treatment costs of these infections. METHODS: For a cohort of 2335 people who inject heroin entering treatment for drug dependence between 2006 and 2017 in London, England, we reported the rates of hospitalisation or death with primary causes of cutaneous abscess, cellulitis, phlebitis, septicaemia, osteomyelitis, septic arthritis, endocarditis, or necrotising fasciitis. We compared these rates to the general population. We also used NHS reference costs to calculate the cost of admissions. RESULTS: During a median of 8.0 years of follow-up, 24 % of patients (570/2335) had a severe bacterial infection, most commonly presenting with cutaneous abscesses or cellulitis. Bacterial infections accounted for 13 % of all hospital admissions. The rate was 73 per 1000 person-years (95 % CI 69-77); 50 times the general population, and the rate remained high throughout follow-up. The rate of severe bacterial infections for women was 1.50 (95 % CI 1.32-1.69) times the rate for men. The mean cost per admission was £4980, and we estimate that the annual cost of hospital treatment for people who inject heroin in London is £4.5 million. CONCLUSIONS: People who inject heroin have extreme and long-term risk of severe bacterial infections.
Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Health Care Costs/trends , Heroin Dependence/epidemiology , Heroin/adverse effects , Severity of Illness Index , Adolescent , Adult , Bacterial Infections/economics , Bacterial Infections/therapy , Cohort Studies , England/epidemiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Heroin/administration & dosage , Heroin/economics , Heroin Dependence/economics , Heroin Dependence/therapy , Hospitalization/economics , Hospitalization/trends , Humans , Incidence , London/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Admission/economics , Patient Admission/trends , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/economics , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/epidemiology , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/therapy , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Heroin overdose is a major cause of premature death. Naloxone is an opioid antagonist that is effective for the reversal of heroin overdose in emergency situations and can be used by nonmedical responders. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to assess the cost-effectiveness of distributing naloxone to adults at risk of heroin overdose for use by nonmedical responders compared with no naloxone distribution in a European healthcare setting (United Kingdom). METHODS: A Markov model with an integrated decision tree was developed based on an existing model, using UK data where available. We evaluated an intramuscular naloxone distribution reaching 30% of heroin users. Costs and effects were evaluated over a lifetime and discounted at 3.5%. The results were assessed using deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: The model estimated that distribution of intramuscular naloxone, would decrease overdose deaths by around 6.6%. In a population of 200,000 heroin users this equates to the prevention of 2,500 premature deaths at an incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained of £899. The sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. CONCLUSIONS: Our evaluation suggests that the distribution of take-home naloxone decreased overdose deaths by around 6.6% and was cost-effective with an incremental cost per QALY gained well below a £20,000 willingness-to-pay threshold set by UK decision-makers. The model code has been made available to aid future research. Further study is warranted on the impact of different formulations of naloxone on cost-effectiveness and the impact take-home naloxone has on the wider society.
Subject(s)
Drug Costs , Drug Overdose/economics , Drug Overdose/prevention & control , Health Services Accessibility/economics , Heroin Dependence/economics , Naloxone/economics , Naloxone/supply & distribution , Narcotic Antagonists/economics , Narcotic Antagonists/supply & distribution , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Decision Support Techniques , Decision Trees , Drug Overdose/mortality , Heroin Dependence/mortality , Humans , Injections, Intramuscular , Markov Chains , Models, Economic , Naloxone/administration & dosage , Narcotic Antagonists/administration & dosage , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , State Medicine/economics , United KingdomABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Heroin use in the United States has reached epidemic proportions. The objective of this paper is to estimate the annual societal cost of heroin use disorder in the United States in 2015 US dollars. METHODS: An analytic model was created that included incarceration and crime; treatment for heroin use disorder; chronic infectious diseases (HIV, Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, and Tuberculosis) and their treatments; treatment of neonatal abstinence syndrome; lost productivity; and death by heroin overdose. RESULTS: Using literature-based estimates to populate the model, the cost of heroin use disorder was estimated to be $51.2 billion in 2015 US dollars ($50,799 per heroin user). One-way sensitivity analyses showed that overall cost estimates were sensitive to the number of heroin users, cost of HCV treatment, and cost of incarcerating heroin users. CONCLUSION: The annual cost of heroin use disorder to society in the United States emphasizes the need for sustained investment in healthcare and non-healthcare related strategies that reduce the likelihood of abuse and provide care and support for users to overcome the disorder.
Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Heroin Dependence/epidemiology , Heroin Dependence/economics , Humans , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In Baltimore, MD, as in many cities throughout the USA, overdose rates are on the rise due to both the increase of prescription opioid abuse and that of fentanyl and other synthetic opioids in the drug market. Supervised injection facilities (SIFs) are a widely implemented public health intervention throughout the world, with 97 existing in 11 countries worldwide. Research has documented the public health, social, and economic benefits of SIFs, yet none exist in the USA. The purpose of this study is to model the health and financial costs and benefits of a hypothetical SIF in Baltimore. METHODS: We estimate the benefits by utilizing local health data and data on the impact of existing SIFs in models for six outcomes: prevented human immunodeficiency virus transmission, Hepatitis C virus transmission, skin and soft-tissue infection, overdose mortality, and overdose-related medical care and increased medication-assisted treatment for opioid dependence. RESULTS: We predict that for an annual cost of $1.8 million, a single SIF would generate $7.8 million in savings, preventing 3.7 HIV infections, 21 Hepatitis C infections, 374 days in the hospital for skin and soft-tissue infection, 5.9 overdose deaths, 108 overdose-related ambulance calls, 78 emergency room visits, and 27 hospitalizations, while bringing 121 additional people into treatment. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that a SIF would be both extremely cost-effective and a significant public health and economic benefit to Baltimore City.
Subject(s)
Heroin Dependence/economics , Heroin Dependence/therapy , Needle-Exchange Programs/economics , Needle-Exchange Programs/organization & administration , Baltimore/epidemiology , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Drug Overdose/mortality , Drug Overdose/prevention & control , HIV Infections/economics , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Harm Reduction , Hepatitis C/economics , Hepatitis C/prevention & control , Heroin Dependence/complications , Humans , Models, Organizational , Opiate Substitution Treatment/economics , Public HealthABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Access to opioid agonist treatment can be associated with extensive waiting periods with significant health and financial burdens. This study aimed to determine whether patients with heroin dependence dispensed buprenorphine-naloxone weekly have greater reductions in heroin use and related adverse health effects 12-weeks after commencing treatment, compared to waitlist controls and to examine the cost-effectiveness of this strategy. METHODS: An open-label waitlist RCT was conducted in an opioid treatment clinic in Newcastle, Australia. Fifty patients with DSM-IV-TR heroin dependence (and no other substance dependence) were recruited. The intervention group (n=25) received take-home self-administered sublingual buprenorphine-naloxone weekly (mean dose, 22.7±5.7mg) and weekly clinical review. Waitlist controls (n=25) received no clinical intervention. The primary outcome was heroin use (self-report, urine toxicology verified) at weeks four, eight and 12. The primary cost-effectiveness outcome was incremental cost per additional heroin-free-day. RESULTS: Outcome data were available for 80% of all randomized participants. Across the 12-weeks, treatment group heroin use was on average 19.02days less/month (95% CI -22.98, -15.06, p<0.0001). A total 12-week reduction in adjusted costs including crime of $A5,722 (95% CI 3299, 8154) in favor of treatment was observed. Excluding crime, incremental cost per heroin-free-day gained from treatment was $A18.24 (95% CI 4.50, 28.49). CONCLUSION: When compared to remaining on a waitlist, take-home self-administered buprenorphine-naloxone treatment is associated with significant reductions in heroin use for people with DSM-IV-TR heroin dependence. This cost-effective approach may be an efficient strategy to enhance treatment capacity.
Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Buprenorphine, Naloxone Drug Combination/therapeutic use , Heroin Dependence/drug therapy , Narcotic Antagonists/therapeutic use , Adult , Analgesics, Opioid/economics , Australia , Buprenorphine, Naloxone Drug Combination/administration & dosage , Buprenorphine, Naloxone Drug Combination/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Heroin Dependence/economics , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Narcotic Antagonists/economics , Treatment Outcome , Waiting ListsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The full burden of the opioid epidemic on US hospitals has not been described. We aimed to estimate how heroin (HOD) and prescription opioid (POD) overdose-associated admissions, costs, outcomes and patient characteristics have changed from 2001 to 2012. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of hospital admissions from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS). SETTING: United States of America. PARTICIPANTS: Hospital admissions in patients aged 18 years or older admitted with a diagnosis of HOD or POD. The NIS sample included 94 492 438 admissions from 2001 to 2012. The final unweighted study sample included 138 610 admissions (POD: 122 147 and HOD: 16 463). MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcomes were rates of admissions per 100 000 people using US Census Bureau annual estimates. Other outcomes included in-patient mortality, hospital length-of-stay, cumulative and mean hospital costs and patient demographics. All analyses were weighted to provide national estimates. FINDINGS: Between 2001 and 2012, an estimated 663 715 POD and HOD admissions occurred nation-wide. HOD admissions increased 0.11 per 100 000 people per year [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.04, 0.17], while POD admissions increased 1.25 per 100 000 people per year (95% CI = 1.15, 1.34). Total in-patient costs increased by $4.1 million dollars per year (95% CI = 2.7, 5.5) for HOD admissions and by $46.0 million dollars per year (95% CI = 43.1, 48.9) for POD admissions, with an associated increase in hospitalization costs to more than $700 million annually. The adjusted odds of death in the POD group declined modestly per year [odds ratio (OR) = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.97, 0.99], with no difference in HOD mortality or length-of-stay. Patients with POD were older, more likely to be female and more likely to be white compared with HOD patients. CONCLUSIONS: Rates and costs of heroin and prescription opioid overdose related admissions in the United States increased substantially from 2001 to 2012. The rapid and ongoing rise in both numbers of hospitalizations and their costs suggests that the burden of POD may threaten the infrastructure and finances of US hospitals.
Subject(s)
Drug Overdose/economics , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Heroin Dependence/economics , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Opioid-Related Disorders/economics , Substance-Related Disorders/economics , Adult , Cost of Illness , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , United StatesABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: In Vietnam, two dominant approaches for heroin treatment are center-based compulsory rehabilitation (CCT), funded by the Vietnamese government and community-based voluntary methadone maintenance treatment (MMT), funded primarily by international donors. Recent reduction in international funding requires more efficient allocation of government funding for public health programs. A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing two approaches provides a useful source of evidence to inform the government about funding reallocation. METHODS: The study was a combined retrospective and prospective, non-randomized cohort comparison over three years of CCT and MMT in Vietnam, conducted between 2012 and 2014, involving 208 CCT participants and 384 MMT participants with heroin dependence. The primary end-point was drug-free days over three years. Total costs, including both program and participant personal costs were measured and cost-effectiveness compared. Mixed effects regression analyses were used to analyze effectiveness data and non-parametric bootstrapping method was used to compare cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: Over three years, MMT costed on average VND85.73 million (US$4108) less than CCT (95% CI: -VND76.88 million, -VND94.59 million). On average, a MMT participant had 344.20 more drug-free days compared to a CCT participant (p<0.001). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for MMT was -VND0.25 million (US$11.99) (95% CI: -VND0.34 million, -VND0.19 million) per drug-free day suggesting MMT is the more cost effective alternative. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to CCT, MMT is both less expensive and more effective in achieving drug-free days. If the government of Vietnam invests in MMT instead of CCT, it is potentially a cost-saving strategy for reducing illicit drug use among heroin dependent individuals.
Subject(s)
Heroin Dependence/rehabilitation , Methadone/economics , Narcotics/economics , Opiate Substitution Treatment/economics , Substance Abuse Treatment Centers/economics , Adult , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Heroin Dependence/economics , Humans , Male , Methadone/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Narcotics/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , VietnamABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Little is known about trends in national rates of injection-related skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI) and their relationship to the structural risk environment for heroin users. Use of Mexican-sourced "Black Tar" heroin, predominant in western US states, may have greater risk for SSTI compared with eastern US powder heroin (Colombian-sourced) due to its association with non-intravenous injection or from possible contamination. METHODS: Using nationally representative hospital admissions data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample and heroin price and purity data from the Drug Enforcement Administration, we looked at rates of hospital admissions for opiate-related SSTI (O-SSTI) between 1993 and 2010. Regression analyses examined associations between O-SSTI and heroin source, form and price. RESULTS: Hospitalization rates of O-SSTI doubled from 4 to 9 per 100,000 nationally between 1993 and 2010; the increase concentrated among individuals aged 20-40. Heroin market features were strongly associated with changes in the rate of SSTI. Each $100 increase in yearly heroin price-per-gram-pure was associated with a 3% decrease in the rate of heroin-related SSTI admissions. Mexican-sourced-heroin-dominant cities had twice the rate of O-SSTI compared to Colombian-sourced-heroin-dominant cities. DISCUSSION: Heroin-related SSTI are increasing and structural factors, including heroin price and source-form, are associated with higher rates of SSTI hospital admissions. Clinical and harm reduction efforts should educate heroin users on local risk factors, e.g., heroin type, promote vein health strategies and provide culturally sensitive treatment services for persons suffering with SSTI.
Subject(s)
Heroin Dependence/complications , Heroin Dependence/epidemiology , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Soft Tissue Infections/epidemiology , Soft Tissue Infections/etiology , Adult , Commerce , Costs and Cost Analysis , Female , Heroin/economics , Heroin Dependence/economics , Hospitalization/economics , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Narcotics/economics , Soft Tissue Infections/economics , United States/epidemiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
Multiple layers of dealers connect international drug traffickers to users. The fundamental activity of these dealers is buying from higher-level dealers and re-selling in smaller quantities at the next lower market level. Each instance of this can be viewed as completing a drug dealing "cycle". This paper introduces an approach for combining isolated accounts of such cycles into a coherent model of the structure, span, and profitability of the various layers of the domestic supply chain for illegal drugs. The approach is illustrated by synthesizing data from interviews with 116 incarcerated dealers to elucidate the structure and operation of distribution networks for cocaine and heroin in Italy and Slovenia. Inmates' descriptions of cycles in the Italian cocaine market suggest fairly orderly networks, with reasonably well-defined market levels. The Italian heroin market appears to have more "level-jumpers" who skip a market level by making a larger number of sales per cycle, with each sale being of a considerably smaller weight. Slovenian data are sparser, but broadly consistent. Incorporating prices allows calculation of how much of the revenue from retail sales is retained by dealers at each market level. In the Italian cocaine market, both retail sellers and the international supply chain outside of Italy each appear to receive about 30-40% of what users spend, with the remaining 30% going to higher-level dealers operating in Italy (roughly 10% to those at the multi-kilo level and 20% to lower level wholesale dealers). Factoring in cycle frequencies permits rough estimation of the number of organizations at each market level per billion euros in retail sales, and of annual net revenues for organizations at each level. These analyses provide an approach to gaining insight into the structure and operation of the supply chain for illegal drugs. They also illustrate the value of two new graphical tools for describing illicit drug supply chains and hint at possible biases in how respondents describe their drug dealing activities.
Subject(s)
Cocaine-Related Disorders/economics , Cocaine/economics , Cocaine/supply & distribution , Commerce , Drug Costs , Drug Trafficking/economics , Heroin Dependence/economics , Heroin/economics , Heroin/supply & distribution , Commerce/legislation & jurisprudence , Commerce/organization & administration , Drug Trafficking/legislation & jurisprudence , Drug and Narcotic Control/economics , Efficiency, Organizational , Humans , Italy , Models, Economic , Models, Organizational , Policy Making , SloveniaABSTRACT
Cost and effect data often have missing data because economic evaluations are frequently added onto clinical studies where cost data are rarely the primary outcome. The objective of this article was to investigate which multiple imputation strategy is most appropriate to use for missing cost-effectiveness data in a randomized controlled trial. Three incomplete data sets were generated from a complete reference data set with 17, 35 and 50 % missing data in effects and costs. The strategies evaluated included complete case analysis (CCA), multiple imputation with predictive mean matching (MI-PMM), MI-PMM on log-transformed costs (log MI-PMM), and a two-step MI. Mean cost and effect estimates, standard errors and incremental net benefits were compared with the results of the analyses on the complete reference data set. The CCA, MI-PMM, and the two-step MI strategy diverged from the results for the reference data set when the amount of missing data increased. In contrast, the estimates of the Log MI-PMM strategy remained stable irrespective of the amount of missing data. MI provided better estimates than CCA in all scenarios. With low amounts of missing data the MI strategies appeared equivalent but we recommend using the log MI-PMM with missing data greater than 35 %.
Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis/methods , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Adult , Female , Heroin Dependence/drug therapy , Heroin Dependence/economics , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Methadone/economics , Methadone/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study explored the delivery of opioid maintenance treatment (OMT) from a specialist program in rural and remote New South Wales (NSW), focusing on the viability of the model and strategies for its improvement. DESIGN: Program evaluation examining configuration and delivery, client characteristics and trends in demand, using policy documents, service data and stakeholder consultations (n = 28). SETTING: The Greater Western Area Health Service, a sparsely populated and large geographic area in NSW. RESULTS: There were four service hubs or primary sites. Three sites were co-located with hospitals and one within community health, with all sites providing assessment, prescribing, dispensing and limited case management. Staff were mainly trained nurses, while prescribers were visiting specialists or sessional GPs. There was minimal OMT provision by community prescribers and dispensers. In 2009, there were 638 clients. They were younger on average than those in OMT across Australia. The most common principal drug of concern was heroin (37-85% of clients), while around one-fifth of clients identified prescription opioids (18-23%). There was a substantial increase in OMT provision between 2006 and 2009 at three program sites. Staff at the sites had limited capacity to engage primary health services and thus reduce their client load. CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate the need to adjust funding to account for increased demand for OMT and to establish a financial incentive for GP prescribers. Dedicated resourcing is needed for a capacity building role to support the uptake of prescribing and dispensing in community services.
Subject(s)
Capacity Building/methods , Heroin Dependence/rehabilitation , Opiate Substitution Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Rural Health Services/supply & distribution , Substance Abuse Treatment Centers/supply & distribution , Adult , Capacity Building/economics , Capacity Building/organization & administration , Female , Health Services Needs and Demand/economics , Health Services Needs and Demand/trends , Heroin Dependence/drug therapy , Heroin Dependence/economics , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , New South Wales , Opiate Substitution Treatment/economics , Opiate Substitution Treatment/standards , Program Evaluation , Rural Health Services/economics , Substance Abuse Treatment Centers/economics , Workforce , Young AdultABSTRACT
This editorial considers the findings of the systematic review of heroin-assisted treatment, with six different studies from six different countries, published in this issue. The meta-analysis focuses on supervised injected heroin and reports significant crime reduction and an overall cost-effectiveness of treatment. Despite this body of evidence, policy makers remain reluctant to develop this treatment further. The question remains, what else is required to convince policy makers of the value of such treatment for severe and refractory heroin dependence?
Subject(s)
Heroin Dependence/drug therapy , Heroin/administration & dosage , Methadone/therapeutic use , Administrative Personnel , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Heroin/adverse effects , Heroin Dependence/economics , HumansABSTRACT
This paper reports estimates of the price elasticity of demand for heroin based on a newly constructed dataset. The dataset has two matched components concerning the same sample of regular heroin users: longitudinal information about real-world heroin demand (actual price and actual quantity at daily intervals for each heroin user in the sample) and experimental information about laboratory heroin demand (elicited by presenting the same heroin users with scenarios in a laboratory setting). Two empirical strategies are used to estimate the price elasticity of demand for heroin. The first strategy exploits the idiosyncratic variation in the price experienced by a heroin user over time that occurs in markets for illegal drugs. The second strategy exploits the experimentally induced variation in price experienced by a heroin user across experimental scenarios. Both empirical strategies result in the estimate that the conditional price elasticity of demand for heroin is approximately -0.80.
Subject(s)
Commerce , Heroin Dependence/economics , Heroin/economics , Adult , Female , Heroin/supply & distribution , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , United StatesABSTRACT
One of the consequences of heroin dependency is a huge expenditure on drugs. This underlying economic expense may be a grave burden for heroin users and may lead to criminal behavior, which is a huge cost to society. The neuropsychological mechanism related to heroin purchase remains unclear. Based on recent findings and the established dopamine hypothesis of addiction, we speculated that expenditure on heroin and central dopamine activity may be associated. A total of 21 heroin users were enrolled in this study. The annual expenditure on heroin was assessed, and the availability of the dopamine transporter (DAT) was assessed by single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) using [(99m)TC]TRODAT-1. Parametric and nonparametric correlation analyses indicated that annual expenditure on heroin was significantly and negatively correlated with the availability of striatal DAT. After adjustment for potential confounders, the predictive power of DAT availability was significant. Striatal dopamine function may be associated with opioid purchasing behavior among heroin users, and the cycle of spiraling dysfunction in the dopamine reward system could play a role in this association.
Subject(s)
Costs and Cost Analysis , Dopamine Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins/metabolism , Heroin Dependence/metabolism , Heroin , Neostriatum/metabolism , Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon/methods , Adult , Female , Heroin Dependence/economics , Humans , Male , Middle AgedABSTRACT
AIMS: Drug policy strategies and discussions often use prevalence of drug use as a primary performance indicator. However, three other indicators are at least as relevant: the number of heavy users, total expenditures and total amount consumed. This paper stems from our efforts to develop annual estimates of these three measures for cocaine (including crack), heroin, marijuana and methamphetamine in the United States. METHODS: The estimates exploit complementary strengths of a general population survey (National Survey on Drug Use and Health) and both survey and urinalysis test result data for arrestees (Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring Program), supplemented by many other data sources. RESULTS: Throughout the 2000s US drug users spent in the order of $100 billion annually on these drugs, although the spending distribution and use patterns changed dramatically. From 2006 to 2010, the amount of marijuana consumed in the United States probably increased by more than 30%, while the amount of cocaine consumed in the United States fell by approximately 50%. These figures are consistent with supply-side indicators, such as seizures and production estimates. For all the drugs, total consumption and expenditures are driven by the minority of users who consume on 21 or more days each month. CONCLUSIONS: Even for established drugs, consumption can change rapidly. The halving of the cocaine market in five years and the parallel (but independent) large rise in daily/near-daily marijuana use are major events that were not anticipated by the expert community and raise important theoretical, research, and policy issues.
Subject(s)
Cocaine-Related Disorders/economics , Cocaine-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Marijuana Abuse/economics , Marijuana Abuse/epidemiology , Cannabis , Cocaine/economics , Heroin Dependence/economics , Heroin Dependence/epidemiology , Humans , Marijuana Smoking/economics , Marijuana Smoking/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
While methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) is beneficial for heroin dependence, there is little information regarding the reductions in monetary cost and gains in productivity following MMT. The aim of this study was to evaluate the changes in the monetary cost of heroin addiction and productivity after one year of MMT. Twenty-nine participants from an MMT clinic were included. The monetary cost, productivity, quality of life (QOL) and mental health status were assessed at both baseline and one year follow-up. The average annual total cost was approximately US$26,485 (1.43 GDP per capita in 2010) at baseline, and decreased by 59.3% to US$10,784 (0.58 GDP) at follow-up. The mean number of months of unemployment dropped from 6.03 to 2.79, the mean income increased to exceed the basic salary, but only reached 45.3% of the national average monthly earnings. The participants׳ mental health improved, but their QOL scores did not increase significantly. After one year of MMT, the monetary cost of heroin addiction fell, both the productivity and mental health of the participants׳ improved, but limited gains were seen with regard to their QOL.