Offset Considerations in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

To perform total hip arthroplasty (THA) successfully, a surgeon must be able to place the implants in a position that will restore and duplicate the patient's baseline anatomy and soft-tissue tension. One of the critical factors is the restoration of femoral offset. It is the goal of this review to precisely define measurement of offset in THA, describe its role in hip joint biomechanics, outline alterations that can be performed intraoperatively, and explain how it can create potential pathologic states. If there is a lack of offset restoration, it can result in a host of complications, including bony impingement with pain, edge loading or prosthetic joint instability, and alterations in the muscle length-tension relationship leading to reduced motor performance. Excessive femoral offset can increase hip abductor muscle and iliotibial band tension resulting in greater trochanteric pain regardless of the surgical approach. The purpose of this review was to analyze intraoperative surgical factors, choice of prosthetic implant type and position that are required to maximize stability, and dynamic motor performance after THA.

A retrospective cohort study: dual cannula combined with modified shoelace continuous capsular closure technique versus nonrepair in hip arthroscopic surgery of femoroacetabular impingement.

BACKGROUND: Over the years, with the improvement of diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities for hip joint diseases and the advancements in surgical technology, hip arthroscopy has been extensively used. At present, there is ongoing controversy among scholars about whether it is necessary to close the joint capsule after hip arthroscopy. In addition, the clinical effect of repairing the hip joint capsule after hip arthroscopy remains uncertain. PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of our modified shoelace suture technique on postoperative hip function and to investigate whether complete closure of the hip capsule is reliable and safe. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study; Levels of evidence: III. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on patients undergoing hip arthroscopy by a solitary high-volume hip arthroscopic surgeon. The patients were categorized into two groups. The first group consisted of patients who underwent the modified shoelace continuous capsular closure technique. The other group consisted of those who did not receive capsular closure after hip arthroscopy. Patient-reported outcomes including modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Hip Outcome Score of Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), Hip Outcome Score Sport-Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS), and visual analogue scale (VAS) were obtained at a minimum of 12 months. Any complications during follow-up were identified and recorded. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients were followed up for 12-15 months, with an average of (12.3 ± 5.3) months in the study. There were 50 patients in the shoelace capsular closure group (CC group) and 50 patients in the non-capsular closure group (NC group). The surgical time in the suture group was significantly longer than that in the non-suture group. However, there was no statistically significant disparity in the length of hospital stay between the two groups. The mHHS, HOS-SSS, HOS-ADL, and VAS of the CC and NC group were significantly improved compared to preoperative scores at 6 and 12 postoperative months (P < 0.001). Compared with the NC group, the CC group showed a significant improvement in the mHHS, HOS-SSS, HOS-ADL, and VAS at 6 postoperative months (t = 4.885, P<0.001; t = 5.984, P<0.001; t = 4.279, P<0.001; t = 3.875, P<0.001). The mHHS, HOS-SSS, HOS-ADL, and VAS at 12 postoperative months were significantly better in the CC group than in the NC group (t = 5.165, P<0.001; t = 3.697, P<0.001; t = 4.840, P<0.001; t = 3.579, P = 0.001). There were no serious complications during the perioperative period. CONCLUSION: The modified shoelace continuous capsular closure technique is a reliable and secure method that can be used as an alternative to the conventional capsular closure. It is recommended to perform routine intraoperative repair of the articular capsule at the end of hip arthroscopy, as this has a positive influences on the functional results at short-term follow-up.

Previous lumbar spine fusion increases the risk of dislocation following total hip arthroplasty in patients with hip-spine syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: With life expectancy on the rise, there has been an increase in patients with concomitant degenerative hip and spine pathology, defined as hip-spine syndrome (HSS). Patients affected by HSS may require both total hip arthroplasty (THA) and lumbar spinal fusion (LSF), although there is a paucity of data regarding how the sequential timing of these procedures may influence clinical outcomes. This study aims to compare complications and spinopelvic parameters in patients with HSS who underwent either LSF first or THA first. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed and Scopus was conducted for randomized and nonrandomized studies investigating complications and spinopelvic parameters in patients with HSS who had undergone THA and LSF. The Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) tool was utilized to assess the risk of bias in included studies. Relevant outcomes were pooled for meta-analysis. RESULTS: Eleven articles were included in this study. There was a significantly higher THA dislocation rate in patients who had undergone LSF first compared to those who had THA first (OR: 3.17, 95% CI 1.23-8.15, P = 0.02). No significant difference was found in terms of THA aseptic loosening (OR: 0.86; 95% CI 0.32-2.32, p = 0.77) and revision rate (OR: 1.18, 95% CI: 0.53-2.62) between these two groups. Individuals who received THA only showed a significantly lower risk of hip dislocation (OR: 0.14, 95% CI: 0.08-0.25, P < 0.00001) and THA revision (OR: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.14-0.36, P < 0.00001) compared to patients with a previous LSF. CONCLUSIONS: In HSS patients who underwent both LSF and THA, those who received LSF first displayed an increased risk of hip dislocation after subsequent THA. Additionally, the relative risks of dislocation and revision rate appeared significantly lower in patients who had undergone THA only when compared to THA patients with a history of previous LSF. Due to the impact of LSF on spinopelvic biomechanics, caution must be exercised when performing THA in individuals with instrumented spines. PROSPERO ID: CRD42023412447. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: LL.

Do 3-dimensional Spinopelvic Characteristics Normalize After THA? A Prospective, Comparative Study Using Motion Capture Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Spinopelvic stiffness (primarily in the sagittal plane) has been identified as a factor associated with inferior patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and increased dislocation risk after THA. Incorporating preoperative spinopelvic characteristics into surgical planning has been suggested to determine a patient-specific cup orientation that minimizes dislocation risk. Sagittal plane radiographic analysis of static postures indicates that patients exhibit a degree of normalization in their spinopelvic characteristics after THA. It is not yet known whether normalization is also evident during dynamic movement patterns, nor whether it occurs in the coronal and axial planes as well. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Does motion capture analysis of sagittal spinopelvic motion provide evidence of normalization after THA? (2) Do changes in coronal and axial plane motion accompany those in the sagittal plane? METHODS: Between April 2019 and February 2020, 25 patients agreed to undergo motion capture movement analysis before THA for the treatment of hip osteoarthritis (OA). Of those, 20 underwent the same assessment between 8 and 31 months after THA. Five patients were excluded because of revision surgery (n = 1), contralateral hip OA (n = 1), and technical issues with a force plate during post-THA assessment (n = 3), leaving a cohort total of 15 (median age [IQR] 65 years [10]; seven male and eight female patients). A convenience sample of nine asymptomatic volunteers, who were free of hip and spinal pathology, was also assessed (median age 51 years [34]; four male and five female patients). Although the patients in the control group were younger than those in the patient group, this set a high bar for our threshold of spinopelvic normalization, reducing the possibility of false positive results. Three-dimensional motion capture was performed to measure spinal, pelvic, and hip motion while participants completed three tasks: seated bend and reach, seated trunk rotation, and gait on a level surface. ROM during each task was assessed and compared between pre- and post-THA conditions and between patients and controls. Statistical parametric mapping (SPM) was used to assess the timing of differences in motion during gait, and spatiotemporal gait parameters were also measured. RESULTS: After THA, patients demonstrated improvements in sagittal spinal (median [IQR] 32° [18°] versus 41° [14°]; difference of medians 9°; p = 0.004), pelvis (25° [21°] versus 30° [8°]; difference of medians 5°; p = 0.02), and hip ROM (21° [18°] versus 27° [10°]; difference of medians 6°; p = 0.02) during seated bend and reach as well in sagittal hip ROM during gait (30° [11°] versus 44° [7°]; difference of medians 14°; p < 0.001) compared with their pre-THA results, and they showed a high degree of normalization overall. These sagittal plane changes were accompanied by post-THA increases in coronal hip ROM (12° [9°] versus 18° [8°]; difference of medians 6°; p = 0.01) during seated trunk rotation, by both coronal (6° [4°] versus 9° [3°]; difference of medians 3°; p = 0.01) and axial (10° [8°] versus 16° [7°]; difference of medians 6°; p = 0.003) spinal ROM, as well as coronal (8° [3°] versus 13° [4°]; difference of medians 5°; p < 0.001) and axial hip ROM (21° [11°] versus 34° [24°]; difference of medians 13°; p = 0.01) during gait compared with before THA. The SPM analysis showed these improvements occurred during the late swing and early stance phases of gait. CONCLUSION: When restricted preoperatively, spinopelvic characteristics during daily tasks show normalization after THA, concurring with previous radiographic findings in the sagittal plane. Thus, spinopelvic characteristics change dynamically, and incorporating them into surgical planning would require predictive models on post-THA improvements to be of use. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prognostic study.

Low Rate of AVN and Complications in Unstable SCFE With Epiphyseal-metaphyseal Discontinuity After Treatment With a Modified Dunn Procedure.

BACKGROUND: The risk of developing avascular necrosis (AVN) in the setting of an unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) that is undergoing treatment with the modified Dunn procedure is not well understood. In addition, since the Loder classification of unstable is reportedly different than actual intraoperatively observed instability (that is, discontinuity between the femoral head epiphysis and proximal femoral metaphysis), the overall risk of developing AVN, as well as the potential complications of treatment of these patients with the modified Dunn procedure, are unknown. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: To evaluate the modified Dunn procedure for the treatment of patients with epiphyseal-metaphyseal discontinuity, we asked: (1) What was the survivorship free from AVN at 10 years? (2) What was the survivorship free from subsequent surgery and/or complications at 10 years? (3) What were the clinical and patient-reported outcome scores? METHODS: In a retrospective analysis, we identified 159 patients (159 hips) treated with a modified Dunn procedure for SCFE between 1998 and 2020, of whom 97% (155 of 159) had documentation about intraoperatively observed epiphyseal-metaphyseal stability. Of those, 37% (58 of 155) of patients were documented to have intraoperatively observed epiphyseal-metaphyseal discontinuity and were considered eligible for inclusion, whereas 63% (97 of 155) had documented epiphyseal-metaphyseal stability and were excluded. No patients were lost to follow-up before the 2-year minimum. All patients were assessed for survival, but 7% (4 of 58) did not fill out our outcomes score questionnaire. This resulted in 93% (54 of 58) of patients who were available for outcome score assessment. Additionally, 50% (29 of 58) of patients had not been seen within the last 5 years; they are included, but we note that there is uncertainty about their status. The median (range) age at surgery was 13 years (10 to 16), and the sex ratio was 60% (35 of 58) male and 40% (23 of 58) female patients. Sixty-four percent (37 of 58) of patients were classified as acute-on-chronic, and 17% (10 of 58) of patients were classified as acute. Forty-seven percent (27 of 58) of patients presented with severe slips and 43% (25 of 58) of patients with moderate slips based on radiographic classification. All patients underwent surgical hip dislocation with the modified Dunn procedure to correct the slip deformity and provide stabilization. Complications and reoperations were assessed from a review of electronic medical records, and a Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to estimate survivorship free from complications and reoperations at 10 years. Clinical examination results and questionnaire responses were evaluated at minimum 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier survivorship free from AVN was 93% (95% CI 87% to 100%) at 10 years. Survivorship free from any reoperation was 75% (95% CI 64% to 88%) at 10 years. In addition, survivorship free from complications, defined as development of AVN, reoperation, or a Sink Grade II complication or higher, was 57% (95% CI 45% to 73%) at 10 years. The median (range) Merle D'Aubigne Postel score was 18 (14 to 18) for the patients who did not develop AVN, and 12 (6 to 16) for the four patients who developed AVN (p < 0.001). The median modified Harris hip score was 100 (74 to 100) in the non-AVN cohort and 65 (37 to 82) in the AVN cohort (p = 0.001). Median HOOS total score was 95 (50 to 100) in the non-AVN cohort and 53 (40 to 82) in the AVN cohort (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Although the modified Dunn procedure is technically challenging, this study shows that in experienced hands, patients with who have demonstrated epiphyseal-metaphyseal discontinuity can be treated with a low risk of AVN and subsequent surgery. Referral of these patients to specialists who have substantial expertise in this procedure is recommended to improve patient outcomes. Prospective, long-term observational studies will help us identify these high-risk patients preoperatively and determine the long-term success of this procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Neurogenic Heterotopic Ossification of the Hip: a Case Report.

Heterotopic ossification (HO) denotes aberrant osteogenesis in extra-skeletal tissues, often associated with neurological disorders, total hip arthroplasty, and specific traumatic scenarios. Neurogenic heterotopic ossification manifests prominently subsequent to traumatic brain injury or spinal cord injury, with Guillain-Barre Syndrome presenting an infrequent etiological link. This article details the case of a 56-year-old female diagnosed with Guillain-Barre Syndrome, who developed neurogenic heterotopic ossification around both hips within two years of disease onset. The patient's medical history included mechanical ventilation, incomplete tetraplegia, and prolonged immobilization. A conclusive diagnosis of HO was established through radiological and clinical assessments. After neurogenic heterotopic ossification was confirmed, the patient had surgery to remove the lesions, radiation therapy, and medication treatments as planned. Physical therapy was introduced one week post-surgery, with subsequent follow-ups tracking improvements in pain levels, range of motion (ROM), and Activities of Daily Living scores. Key words: neurogenic heterotopic ossification, Guillain-Barre syndrome, hip, excision.

Effects of Ward Noise Management on Mental Health and Hip Function in Elderly Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore the influence of ward noise management on the mental health and hip joint function of elderly patients post-total hip arthroplasty. METHODS: The retrospective analysis involved the medical records of 160 elderly patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty at Nanchang First Hospital from March 2021 to January 2023. The observation group received ward noise management (n = 75) and the control group received perioperative routine management (n = 85). The noise level, Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS), Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), the Generic Quality of Life Inventory-74 (GQOLI-74), Harris Hip Score (HHS) system, and satisfaction scale were used to evaluate patients. T test and chi-square tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The observation group exhibited a significantly lower noise level compared to the control group (P < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in the general information and preoperative SDS, SAS, HHS, and GQOLI-74 scores between the two groups (P > 0.05). No significant differences were observed in the SDS and HHS between the two groups 7 days after the operation (P > 0.05). The observation group presented a significantly lower SAS score than the control group 7 days after the operation (P < 0.05). The score of the observation group 7 days after the operation was lower than that before the operation (P < 0.05). At 7 days after the operation, the observation group showed a higher score in the "social function" dimension of GQOLI-74 compared to the control group (P < 0.05), and the satisfaction of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group (94.67 vs. 77.65%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Ward noise management can help reduce anxiety among elderly patients after total hip arthroplasty, improve their quality of life and social function, and obtain higher satisfaction.

A comprehensive predictive model for postoperative joint function in robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty patients: combining radiomics and clinical indicators.

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) effectively treats various end-stage hip conditions, offering pain relief and improved joint function. However, surgical outcomes are influenced by multifaceted factors. This research aims to create a predictive model, incorporating radiomic and clinical information, to forecast post-surgery joint function in robot-assisted THA (RA-THA) patients. The study set comprised 136 patients who underwent unilateral RA-THA, which were subsequently partitioned into a training set (n = 95) and a test set (n = 41) for analysis. Preoperative CT imaging was employed to derive 851 radiomic characteristics, selecting those with an intra-class correlation coefficient > 0.75 for analysis. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression reduced redundancy to six significant radiomic features. Clinical data including preoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Harris Hip Score (HHS), and Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score were collected. Logistic regression identified significant predictors, and three models were developed. Receiver operating characteristic and decision curves evaluated the models. Preoperative VAS, HHS, WOMAC score, and radiomics feature scores were significant predictors. In the training set, the AUCs were 0.835 (clinical model), 0.757 (radiomic model), and 0.891 (combined model). In the test set, the AUCs were 0.777 (clinical model), 0.824 (radiomic model), and 0.881 (combined model). The constructed nomogram prediction model combines radiological features with relevant clinical data to accurately predict functional outcomes 3 years after RA-THA. This model has significant prediction accuracy and broad clinical application prospects and can provide a valuable reference for formulating personalized treatment plans and optimizing patient management strategies.

How Strong Is the Ligamentum Teres of the Hip? A Biomechanical Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Intraarticular hip pain represents a substantial clinical challenge, with recent studies implicating lesions in the ligamentum teres as potential contributors. Even more so, damage to the ligamentum teres is particularly prevalent among young patients undergoing joint-preserving interventions. Although several studies have investigated the biomechanical attributes of the ligamentum teres, inconsistencies in reported findings and reliance on cadaveric or animal models have raised concerns regarding the extrapolation of results to clinical practice. Furthermore, there is a lack of research examining ligamentum teres biomechanics specifically within the relevant patient cohort-individuals who benefit from joint-preserving surgical interventions. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We sought (1) to determine the biomechanical properties (ultimate load to failure, tensile strength, stiffness, and elastic modulus) of fresh-frozen ligaments from patients undergoing surgical hip dislocation, and (2) to identify patient-specific factors that are associated with them. METHODS: This was an institutional review board-approved study on intraoperatively harvested ligamentum teres from 74 consecutive patients undergoing surgical hip dislocation for joint preservation (August 2021 to September 2022). After the exclusion of patients with previous surgery, posttraumatic deformities, avascular necrosis, slipped capital femoral epiphysis, and Perthes disease, 31 ligaments from 31 patients were analyzed. The mean age of the study group was 27 ± 8 years, and 61% (19) of participants were male. The main indication for surgery was femoroacetabular impingement. Standardized AP pelvic and axial radiographs and CT scans were performed in all patients for better radiological description of the population and to identify associated radiological factors. The ligament was thoroughly transected at its origin on the fossa acetabuli and at the insertion area on the fovea capitis and stored at -20°C until utilization. Specimens were mounted to a materials testing machine via custom clamps that minimized slippage and the likelihood of failure at the clamp. Force-displacement and stress-strain curves were generated. Ultimate failure load (N), tensile strength (MPa), stiffness (N/mm), and elastic modulus (MPa) were determined. Using a multivariate regression analysis and a subgroup analysis, we tested demographic, degenerative, and radiographic factors as potential associated factors. RESULTS: The ligamentum teres demonstrated an ultimate load to failure of 126 ± 92 N, and the tensile strength was 1 ± 1 MPa. The ligaments exhibited a stiffness of 24 ± 15 N/mm and an elastic modulus of 7 ± 5 MPa. After controlling for potential confounding variables like age, fossa/fovea degeneration, and acetabular/femoral morphologies, we found that female sex was an independent factor for higher tensile strength, stiffness, and elastic modulus. Excessive femoral version was independently associated with lower load to failure (HR 122 [95% CI 47 to 197]) and stiffness (HR 15 [95% CI 2 to 27]). Damage to the acetabular fossa was associated with reduced load to failure (HR -93 [95% CI -159 to -27]). CONCLUSION: Overall, the ligamentum teres is a relatively weak ligament. Sex, degeneration, and excessive femoral version are influencing factors on strength of the ligamentum teres. The ligamentum teres exhibits lower strength compared with other joint-stabilizing ligaments, which calls into question its overall contribution to hip stability. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Young patients undergoing hip-preserving surgery are the population at risk for ligamentum teres lesions. Baseline values for load to failure, tensile strength, elastic modulus, and stiffness are needed to better understand those lesions in this cohort of interest.

Patient Factors Influencing Outcomes at 12-Year Follow-up of Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement.

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement has increased in popularity since the early 2000s when it was first described, although only a few midterm follow-up studies have been published. PURPOSE: To describe the outcomes of patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement at a mean 12-year follow-up and to determine the risk factors for failure. STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: The Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS) and a radiographic evaluation were completed preoperatively and at midterm follow-up. Participants were divided into 2 groups according to their clinical evolution. The success group consisted of patients whose NAHS at the final follow-up was above the established Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) threshold of 81.9, whereas patients who underwent a second surgical intervention or did not reach the PASS threshold at final follow-up were assigned to the failure group. These groups were compared to identify preoperative differences in demographic, pathological, and surgical factors. RESULTS: A total of 95 hips were included, after 23 were lost to follow-up (80.5% follow-up). At a mean follow-up of 12.1 years (range, 9.2-16.0 years), 9 hips required total hip arthroplasty (9.5%), 5 required revision hip arthroscopy (5.3%), 29 did not achieve the NAHS PASS threshold (30.5%), and 52 achieved the NAHS PASS threshold (54.7%). The mean NAHS was 82.4 at final follow-up compared with 66.9 preoperatively (mean difference = 15.5; P < .001). Higher mean body mass index (24.9 vs 23.0; P = .030), older age (30.0 vs 27.2; P = .035), and inferior preoperative lateral joint space width (3.9 vs 4.4; P = .019) were associated with inferior prognosis in the failure group versus success group. Osteoarthritis progression was observed in 69.2% of the failure group and in 34.8% of the success group (P = .082). Labral ossification was observed in 78.3% of all patients, and its lateral projection length was statistically associated with failure (P = .015). CONCLUSION: At a mean 12-year follow-up, hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement led to significant clinical improvement, with 55% PASS achievement. In total, 31% of patients were below the PASS threshold, 5% had revision arthroscopy, and only 9% had conversion to total hip arthroplasty for a 45% global failure rate. Increased body mass index, older age, and smaller preoperative lateral joint space width were significant negative prognostic factors. Postoperative degenerative changes were highly prevalent and demonstrated association with failure.

Risk factors for residual pelvic obliquity one year after total hip arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: It is not uncommon for patients with hip disorders to present with pelvic obliquity (PO), and residual PO after total hip arthroplasty (THA) may not only affect hip joint function but also cause adjacent intervertebral joint disorders. This study aimed to investigate the postoperative PO impact on clinical outcomes and risk factors by comparing patients who had PO after THA to those who did not. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted. A total of 103 patients who underwent THA were included in this study from 2018 to 2020. Demographics, functional outcomes, and spinopelvic parameters were compared between post-THA PO of less than 2° (NT group, 55 patients) and PO of 2° or more (O group, 48 patients). Multivariate analysis was performed using factors with significant differences in univariate analysis. RESULTS: Postoperative Harris Hip Score Activity was significantly lower in the T group than in the NT group (p = 0.031). Preoperative PO was smaller in the NT group than in the T group (p = 0.001). Preoperative lumbar bending range (LBR) was significantly more flexible in the NT group than in the T group. In the logistic regression analysis, Age (odds ratio 0.957, 95% CI 0.923-0.993, p = 0.020), preoperative PO (odds ratio 1.490, 95% CI 1.100-2.020, p = 0.001), and LBR (odds ratio 0.848, 95% CI 0.756-0.951, p = 0.005) were found to be significant factors. CONCLUSION: Younger age and large preoperative PO, and poor lumbar spine mobility were identified as risk factors for residual postoperative PO.

Native hip geometry restoration in total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective analysis of eight different short stems.

PURPOSE: To compare different types of short stems (SS) in terms of native hip geometry reproducibility, analyzing centrum-collum-diaphyseal angle (CCD) and femoral offset (FO). These parameters allow the SS to be adapted to patient's anatomy in order to ensure better functional outcomes in total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: A total of 387 cases of SS met the inclusion criteria. CCD and FO were measured using MediCAD® software Version 6 in preoperative (preop-) and postoperative (postop-) X-rays at 6-12 months after surgery. Considering preop-CCD, the sample was divided into three groups: ≤ 124.9° (A); 125°-129.9° (B); and ≥ 130°(C). Preop- and postop-CCD and FO and the respective average difference (Δ) were examined considering the SS individually and within groups, to verify reproducibility of these parameters. RESULTS: The SS considered were eight: Fitmore Zimmer, Pulchra Adler, TRIS Adler, Trifit Corin, Trilock Depuy, Actis Depuy, Profemur Microport, and SMF Smith&Nephew. Groups A, B, and C consisted, respectively, of 113, 124, and 150 cases. Considering all cases, there was a statistically significant (p < 0.05) increase in CCD and FO with surgery. Overall, Trifit and Trilock stems were the best in reproducing preop-CCD, Trifit itself followed by Pulchra and Profemur for preop-FO. In groups A and C, the reproduction of preop-CCD was better than preop-FO, in contrast in group B. With regard to preop-CCD reproduction, in group A Trifit and Pulchra, in group B Fitmore and Trifit, and in group C Fitmore and Pulchra were the best. Fitmore in group A, SMF in group B, Pulchra and Trilock in group C were the worst in reproducing preop-FO. CONCLUSION: Each hip anatomy is unique, and reproduction of preop-CCD and preop-FO can be achieved with different SS characteristics. Accurate knowledge of the stems and performing correct preop- planning are crucial to allow the best restoration of the patient's native hip geometry in THA.

Changes in rotator movement during early gait acquisition in after total hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: In walking in healthy adults, rotation of the hip joint affects stride length and shifts the center of gravity, but these are not seen in hip osteoarthritis which affects gait. In gait of total hip arthroplasty, there are few reports on changes in the horizontal plane. This study clarified the preoperative and early postoperative gait characteristics of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. METHODS: The analysis included 12 females who underwent initial total hip arthroplasty using a posterolateral approach. Gait was measured pre and postoperatively using a three-dimensional motion analysis device. Statistics were compared pre and postoperative range of motion, muscle strength, walking speed, stride length, gravity movement distance, trunk angle, hip joint angle, and joint moment. FINDINGS: The maximum hip abduction moment and trunk flexion angle to the surgical side were lower than in healthy subjects. The angle of internal rotation during the stance phase was significantly higher in the postoperative period. The distance of the center of gravity shift in the left and right directions was significantly decreased postoperatively. INTERPRETATION: Gait disturbance was seen preoperatively and remained after surgery. Walking after total hip arthroplasty provides the hip joint rotates inward which is closer to normal walking. However, no change was observed in the external rotation moment of the hip joint during walking. We suspect that the invasiveness of the posterolateral approach of total hip arthroplasty affects the muscles for external rotation of the hip joint. This can also cause in gait disturbances.

Does two dimensional templating allow for the use of reduced-size ancillaries in total hip arthroplasty?

PURPOSE: Rising costs in healthcare for total hip arthroplasty (THA) mean that new solutions must be considered, such as the use of single-use ancillaries (SUA). The goal of this study was to assess the accuracy of 2D templating in primary THA for the use of reduced-size SUA. Our hypothesis was that the accuracy of 2D templating in primary THA would be higher than 95%, give or take two sizes. METHOD: This single-centre prospective study included all primary THAs performed over two years. Templating was carried out using 2D templating on anteroposterior pelvic X-rays. The template sizes were compared to the implant sizes. The primary endpoint was the rate of coincidence between digitally templated estimates and the actual implant sizes. The secondary endpoint was the difference of accuracy based on patient parameters. RESULTS: We analysed 512 cases of THA. Accuracy within two sizes was 96.9% for acetabular implants and 98.5% for femoral implants. Accuracy was below the 95% threshold only in patients under 55 and over 85 years old. A BMI above 30.0 kg/m2 significantly reduced accuracy but did not fall below the 95% threshold. The operated hip, the type of implant, and the operative indication did not significantly influence templating accuracy. CONCLUSION: Using reduced-size SUA with five rasps and five reamers depending on template sizes means that THA can be performed in more than 95% of cases allowing the use of compact single use ancillaries.

[Modified gluteus maximus transfer for hip abductor deficiency]. / Modifizierter Gluteus-maximus-Transfer zur Therapie der glutealen Insuffizienz.

OBJECTIVE: Transfer of the gluteus maximus with refixation at the greater trochanter for treatment of abductor deficiency. INDICATIONS: Symptomatic abductor deficiency with atrophy and fatty degeneration of the gluteal muscles > 50% (grade 3 by quartile) with good strength of the gluteus maximus. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Low atrophy or fatty degeneration of less than 50% of the gluteal muscles, limited strength of the gluteus maximus, infection. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: First, the fascia lata is incised dorsally to the tensor fascia latae muscle, with the incision extending approximately 1.5 cm proximal to the iliac crest. A second incision divides the gluteus maximus muscle longitudinally along the muscle fibers and continues towards the fascia lata distal to the greater trochanter. These incisions result in a triangular muscle flap, which is elevated and divided into anterior and posterior portions. The posterior flap is positioned ventrally over the femoral neck and fixed to the anterior capsule and the anterior edge of the greater trochanter. The anterior flap is placed directly on the proximal femur. For this purpose, a groove is prepared in the area of the proximal femur using a spherical burr to freshen up the future footprint. The anterior flap is positioned from the tip of the greater trochanter towards the insertion of the vastus lateralis muscle. Subsequently, the anterior flap is fixed to the created groove with transosseous sutures and positioned under the elevated vastus lateralis muscle in 15° abduction of the leg. To provide additional stabilization to the tendinous part of the anterior flap, a screw is inserted distally to the greater trochanter. The vastus lateralis muscle is attached to the distal tip of the anterior flap, and the remaining gluteus maximus muscle is sutured to the fascia lata to cover the anterior flap. Additionally, a flap of the tensor fascia latae muscle can be mobilized and adapted to the reconstruction. Layered wound closure is performed. RESULTS: The technique of a gluteus maximus transfer represents a method for the treatment of chronic abductor deficiencies and improves abduction function as well as the gait pattern in short-term follow-ups. Fifteen patients (mean age at time of surgery 62 years) had after a mean follow-up of 2.5 years. The modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) improved from 48 points preoperatively to 60 points at follow-up. Preoperatively, 100% had a positive Trendelenburg sign; at follow-up, this was about 50%.

Longitudinal Assessment of Clinical Outcomes After Arthroscopic Treatment for Hip Synovial Chondromatosis and the Effect of Residual Loose Bodies: Minimum 4-Year and 8-Year Follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic treatment is recommended for hip synovial chondromatosis. However, evidence regarding long-term clinical outcomes is limited. PURPOSE: To evaluate long-term patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and survival, and to determine the potential effect of residual loose bodies, as evaluated by immediate postoperative computed tomography (CT), on clinical outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A consecutive cohort of patients undergoing arthroscopic treatment and diagnosed with synovial chondromatosis between March 2010 and May 2015 were included in the study. Preoperative radiography, CT, and magnetic resonance imaging were performed. Preoperative, midterm (minimum of 4 years), and long-term (minimum of 8 years) PROs were collected for visual analog scale for pain, modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS), and 12-item international Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12). The percentages achieving minimal clinically important difference (MCID) were calculated. PROs and survival were compared between patients with and without residual loose bodies evident on immediate postoperative CT scan. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients (20% of patients were lost to follow-up) were included in the study with a mean follow-up period of 104.9 months (range, 96-139 months). PROs including visual analog scale for pain (preoperative, 3.8 ± 1.2; midterm, 0.9 ± 1.7; long-term, 0.8 ± 1.4), mHHS (preoperative, 66.4 ± 14.4; midterm, 92.8 ± 12.3; long-term, 93.5 ± 10.5), NAHS (preoperative, 45.2 ± 16.2; midterm, 81.8 ± 15.3; long-term, 83.1 ± 12.9), and iHOT-12 (preoperative, 48.4 ± 15.6; midterm, 69.3 ± 11.7; long-term, 72.7 ± 11.4) were improved at both midterm and long-term follow-up (all with P < .001). In total, 27 (96.4%), 28 (100%), and 26 (92.9%) patients achieved MCID for mHHS, NAHS and iHOT-12, respectively, at the long-term follow-up. No significant difference was found in any of the PROs and the rate of achieving MCID between midterm and long-term follow-up (all with P > .05). One patient (3.6%) underwent revision surgery. Among the 23 patients who had loose bodies on preoperative CT or radiographs, 14 patients (60.9%) with residual loose bodies evident on immediate postoperative CT demonstrated lower NAHS (P = .045) and iHOT-12 (P = .037) scores but a comparable survival (P > .05) at long-term follow-up compared with those who did not have loose bodies. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic treatment for hip synovial chondromatosis achieved satisfactory long-term clinical outcomes with strong survival. Most patients maintained or improved their overall functional status between midterm and long-term follow-up. Furthermore, patients with residual loose bodies had less favorable clinical outcomes, although the survival rate was comparable.

Comparison of mid-term clinical and radiological results of short and conventional femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty.

This study aims to answer the question: Which are superior-conventional or short femoral stems?. An Optymis stem was used as a short-femoral stem, and an Accolade II stem was used as a conventional-femoral stem. There were 95 patients in the short femoral stem group (Group 1) and 90 in the conventional stem group (Group 2). The SF-36 Life Quality Score, thigh pain, and the Harris Hip Score were used to evaluate the patients' clinical outcomes. Pre-operative, immediate post-operative, and final follow-up x-rays were used for radiological evaluation. Stem varus/valgus alignment, hip offset changing, acetabular anteversion/inclination changing, femoral migration, acetabular migration, periarticular ossification, and osteointegration evaluation were assessed for both groups. The mean follow-up time was 5.5 years for Group 1 and 5.2 years for Group 2. No significant difference existed between the two groups in terms of clinical scores (Harris Hip Score, SF-36). Thigh pain was significantly higher in Group 2 (p = 0.0001). As for radiological parameters, Group 1 exhibited more varus position-related results. In terms of angular stability, Group 1 was found to be more unstable than Group 2 (p = 0.0001). The power to reconstruct femoral offset was superior in Group 1. Periarticular ossification was more frequent in Group 2. Femoral osteointegration was denser proximally in Group 1 and distally in Group 2. When mid-term radiological and clinical results of both femoral stems are evaluated, they have no superiority over each other.

Effect of collaborative nursing method based on RAM model on postoperative functional reconstruction, soft tissue pain and living quality in patients with femoral trochanter fracture.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the effect of collaborative nursing based on Roy Adaptive Mode (RAM) on postoperative functional reconstruction, soft tissue pain and quality of life in patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture. METHODS: A retrospective matched control method was used in this study. A total of 96 patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture admitted to our hospital from July 2018 to September 2021 were selected. According to different nursing methods, the patients were divided into a collaborative group and a routine group, with 48 cases in each group. Patients in both groups were treated with intramedullary nail surgery. The routine group was given routine perioperative nursing intervention, and the collaborative group was given collaborative nursing intervention on this basis. The hip function recovery and quality of life before and after the intervention were compared between the two groups. The preoperative and postoperative pain degree, and the perioperative complications of the two groups were recorded. Logistic multivariate regression analysis was used to analyze the risk factors affecting the recovery of hip joint function in patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture after operation, thereby constructing a risk prediction model. ROC curve was used to analyze the clinical value of influencing factors in predicting postoperative hip function recovery in patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture. RESULTS: Harris score each dimension after intervention in the collaborative group was obviously higher than that of before intervention and the conventional group (P < 0.05). After intervention, the excellent and good rate of hip joint function the collaborative group was 83.33%, which was significantly higher than 60.42% in the routine group (P < 0.05). Postoperative VAS scores each time point in the collaborative group was obviously lower than that in the routine group (P < 0.05). After intervention, the scores of physiological function, physiological role, body pain and general health in the collaborative group were significantly higher than those in the routine group (P < 0.05). The incidence of complications in the collaborative group was 6.25%, which was significantly lower than 22.92% in the routine group (P < 0.05). There were statistically significant differences in age, preoperative ASA grade, internal fixation method, osteoporosis grade and perioperative nursing methods between the excellent hip recovery group and the poor hip recovery group (P < 0.05). Logistic multivariate regression analysis showed that age, preoperative ASA grade, internal fixation method and osteoporosis grade were the risk factors affecting the recovery of hip joint function after operation, and perioperative nursing method was the protective factor (P < 0.05). Among the influencing factors, the internal fixation method and the grade of osteoporosis had certain clinical value in predicting the recovery of hip joint function in patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture after operation. CONCLUSION: The RAM model-based collaborative nursing method may effectively restore the hip joint function of patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture after operation, and may reduce the perioperative pain degree of patients, improve the quality of life of patients and reduce the incidence of complications, which can be popularized and applied in clinical practice. In addition, there are many factors influencing the recovery of hip joint function in patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture after operation, and targeted measures should be taken according to the influencing factors to improve the effect of intramedullary nail treatment.