Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 25.278
Filter
Add more filters








Publication year range
1.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak ; 24(1): 286, 2024 Oct 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39367415

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Measures in operations management are pivotal for monitoring and assessing various aspects of hospital performance. Existing literature highlights the importance of regularly updating key management measures to reflect changing trends and organizational goals. Advancements in machine learning (ML) have presented promising opportunities for enhancing the process of updating operations management measures. However, their specific application and performance remain relatively unexplored. We aimed to investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of using common ML techniques to identify and update key measures in hospital operations management. METHODS: Historical data on 43 measures on financial balance and quality of care under 4 categories were retrieved from the BI system of a regional health system in Central China. The dataset included 17 surgical and 15 non-surgical departments over 48 months. Four common ML techniques, linear models (LM), random forest (RF), partial least squares (PLS), and neural networks (NN), were used to identify the most important measures. Ordinary least square was employed to investigate the impact of the top 10 measures. A ground truth validation compared the ML-identified key measures against the humanly decided strategic measures from annual meeting minutes. RESULTS: For financial balancing, inpatient treatment revenue was an important measure in 3/4 years, followed by equipment depreciation costs. The measures identified using the same technique differed between years, though RF and PLS yielded relatively consistent results. For quality of care, none of the ML-identified measures repeated over the years. Those consistently important over four years differed almost entirely among four techniques. On ground truth validation, the 2016-2019 ML-identified measures were among the humanly identified measures, with the exception of equipment depreciation from the 2019 dataset. All the ML-identified measures for quality of care failed to coincide with the humanly decided measures. CONCLUSIONS: Using ML to identify key hospital operational measures is viable but performance of ML techniques vary considerably. RF performs best among the four techniques in identifying key measures in financial balance. None of the ML techniques seem effective for identifying quality of care measures. ML is suggested as a decision support tool to remind and inspire decision-makers in certain aspects of hospital operations management.


Subject(s)
Feasibility Studies , Machine Learning , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Hospital Administration , China , Algorithms
2.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 1185, 2024 Oct 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39367426

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hospital resilience has been well recognized among healthcare managers and providers as disruption of hospital services that threatens their business environment. However, the shocks identified in the recent hospital resilience concept are mainly related to disaster situations. This study aims to identify potential shocks that hospitals face during disruptions in Indonesia. METHOD: This qualitative study was conducted in Makassar, Indonesia in August-November 2022. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews with hospital managers and resilience experts using a semi-structured interview guide. 20 key informants were interviewed and data were analyzed by thematic analysis. RESULTS: The study identified seven shocks to hospitals during the disruption era: policy, politics, economics, hospital management shifting paradigms, market and consumer behavior changes, disasters, and conflicts. It also identified barriers to making hospitals resilient, such as inappropriate organizational culture, weak cooperation across sectors, the traditional approach of hospital management, inadequate managerial and leadership skills, human resources inadequacies, a lack of business mindset and resistance to change. CONCLUSION: This study provides a comprehensive understanding of hospital shocks during disruptions. This may serve as a guide to redesigning the instruments and capabilities needed for a resilient hospital.


Subject(s)
Qualitative Research , Indonesia , Humans , Hospital Administration , Interviews as Topic , Hospitals , Organizational Culture , Disasters , Leadership , Male , Female , Resilience, Psychological
3.
J Healthc Manag ; 69(5): 335-349, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39240264

ABSTRACT

GOAL: Recent efforts to push hospitals to provide high-value care have relied on payment incentives. However, evidence indicates that 70% to 90% of performance improvement projects do not achieve their desired goals. Therefore, in addition to managing external industry pressures, hospitals need to develop performance improvement (PI) capabilities that enable them to capitalize on improvement opportunities, effectively develop and adopt solutions, and ensure the sustainability of improvements over time. While operational capabilities enable hospitals to produce and deliver services, more is needed to attain and sustain superior performance. Dynamic capabilities drive changes in operational capabilities to meet environmental demands. Dynamic capabilities also enable hospitals to renew and reconfigure their resources to optimize performance. This paper proposes the dynamic-capabilities framework as an appropriate way to develop and manage PI capabilities in hospitals, and it discusses the implications of shifting to a strategy that is driven by dynamic-capabilities PI. METHODS: The research team designed a semi-structured interview based on a review of the literature to understand whether hospitals were engaging in the activities outlined in the dynamic-capabilities framework. Nine study participants were recruited from a convenience sample of hospital PI staff at hospitals in Massachusetts and New Hampshire. De-identified transcripts were entered into NVivo12 qualitative data analysis software, and data were thematically indexed and coded following the principles of content analysis. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: PI structures, improvement methodologies, and weaknesses did not vary significantly among hospitals. Most hospitals had a PI department and were more likely to adopt PI projects initiated by top management. While PI staff were trained in improvement methodologies, no programs were in place that required the rest of the hospital staff to become familiar with PI methods. Common areas of weakness were PI project selection, communication, coordination, learning from current and former PI projects, and systematic approaches to sustain improvements. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: Dynamic PI capabilities provide an opportunity to systematically identify improvement opportunities, seize on and learn from those opportunities, and renew and reconfigure resources to optimize performance. Ad hoc PI projects are insufficient to enable a hospital to sustain superior performance. Internal and external pressures to deliver high-value patient care and services require hospitals to exceed their current PI efforts. By developing dynamic PI capabilities, hospitals will adopt a more systematic and effective approach to PI, which will likely result in superior performance.


Subject(s)
Quality Improvement , Hospital Administration , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Hospitals
4.
Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl) ; ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print)2024 Sep 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39258863

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Strategic leadership plays an important role in achieving organizational success in surviving and growing in a challenging business environment. This study aims to examine the role of strategic leadership in responding to a rare moment in the health industry, which is the combination of government regulations that tend to continue to change and the emergence of COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: A total of 358 respondents from 141 type C and D hospitals in Indonesia participated in this research. This study used six latent variables and 27 dimensions, processed using structural equation modeling. FINDINGS: The results of this study confirmed that resilient leaders will not seek new partners by developing network capabilities; but rather choose to save the hospital first, by resources reconfiguration as response to the unanticipated adversity caused by fusing the government regulation and emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: This study makes an important contribution that enables hospital management to develop action plans in response to national health-care regulations coupled with the emergence and extension of the COVID-19 pandemic; as well as the results of the investigation into organizational resources, and to implement strategic resilience capability more effectively.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Leadership , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Indonesia , Government Regulation , Hospital Administration , Resilience, Psychological
5.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 1088, 2024 Sep 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39294661

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The benefits of lean adoption in healthcare include improved process efficiency and quality of patient care. However, research indicates that lean implementation in healthcare, and specifically hospitals, is often not sustained. Furthermore, there is a need for maturity models that guide lean implementation, specifically in hospitals. This study develops a prescriptive maturity model named the Sustaining of Lean Adoption in Hospitals Roadmap (SOLAR) that acts as a practical guideline for the sustainable adoption of lean in hospitals. METHODS: The SOLAR has three theoretical foundations, namely lean implementation success factors in hospitals, implementation science, and change management theory. A systematic literature review was conducted to determine the lean implementation success factors in hospitals as the first building block. Secondly, practices from implementation science were used to create the action items in the SOLAR. Ten change steps were elicited from change management theory as the third theoretical building block of the roadmap. We refined the roadmap through three Delphi rounds that verified its useability in hospitals. RESULTS: The final SOLAR consists of four maturity phases (prepare, plan, experiment and learn, and sustain) and includes action items for each phase related to the hospital's strategy, resources, engaging of people, and culture. The action items and change management steps shown in the SOLAR are not intended as an exhaustive list but provide guidelines on aspects hospitals must consider when they aim to adopt lean sustainably. CONCLUSIONS: The strong theoretical base of the SOLAR enables hospitals to safely experiment and learn which implementation methods are best suited to their unique environment. The SOLAR is, therefore, an actionable guideline that informs both academics and practitioners involved in lean adoption in hospitals. This roadmap can guide future retrospective longitudinal or action research.


Subject(s)
Delphi Technique , Humans , Quality Improvement , Total Quality Management , Hospital Administration , Hospitals/standards , Change Management , Efficiency, Organizational
6.
Br J Hosp Med (Lond) ; 85(8): 1-17, 2024 Aug 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39212551

ABSTRACT

Aims/Background: In an era where patient-centred care is paramount, effectively managing and analyzing hospital complaints is crucial for improving service quality and patient satisfaction. This study examines hospital complaints to enhance management practices by differentiating between surgery-related and non-surgery-related grievances. By identifying patterns in complaint types and outcomes, we aim to inform targeted quality improvement strategies that address specific patient concerns and boost operational efficiency. Methods: The study utilized data from an internal complaint management system over one year. Complaints were categorized as either surgery-related or non-surgery-related. Descriptive statistics and cross-tabulation analysis were employed to examine the data. The sample comprised 132 complaints, with 67 being surgery-related and 65 non-surgery-related. Results: The analysis revealed that surgery-related complaints frequently involved issues with 'Patient Communication' and 'Surgical Error', while non-surgery-related complaints were primarily about the 'Medical Treatment Process'. The Surgery Department received the highest number of complaints, indicating a critical area for intervention. Additionally, the correlation between complaint types and outcomes provided insights into potential areas for improvement. Conclusion: The findings highlight the need for targeted communication training and procedural enhancements in surgical departments. Non-surgical departments should focus on improving treatment protocols and transparency. These strategies can reduce complaints and improve patient satisfaction. Future research should develop and test interventions based on these insights to further enhance healthcare quality.


Subject(s)
Patient Satisfaction , Humans , Communication , Surgical Procedures, Operative , Quality Improvement , Medical Errors/prevention & control , Patient-Centered Care , Hospital Administration , Quality of Health Care , Surgery Department, Hospital/organization & administration
7.
Cien Saude Colet ; 29(8): e05052024, 2024 Aug.
Article in Portuguese, English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39140532

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to analyze the role of nurses in hospital management in the face of COVID-19. The study had a qualitative, descriptive, and exploratory approach. The setting was a hospital that was completely transformed to care for patients with COVID-19. At the time of data collection, ten nurses managed the services, and all participated in the semi-structured interview. After thematic analysis, the data were presented in three categories, representing the elements of Donabedian's triad: structure, process, and result. Category 1 highlighted the hospital structure reconfiguration based on material and people management; category 2 addressed the work process restructuring to achieve goals with safety and quality; and category 3 focused on nurses' experiences in describing the results achieved and expected. The analysis highlighted the importance of teamwork, involvement, and adaptation of managers in the face of the challenges of a new and life-threatening disease, scarce resources, and the complexity of human relationships in the crisis. In transformational leadership, these nurses encouraged behavior change, professional growth, and resilience.


Objetivou-se analisar a atuação dos enfermeiros na gestão hospitalar frente à COVID-19. O estudo teve uma abordagem qualitativa, do tipo descritivo e exploratório. O cenário foi um hospital que se transformou totalmente para atendimento de pacientes com COVID-19. No momento da coleta de dados, dez enfermeiros estavam à frente da gestão dos serviços, e todos participaram da entrevista semiestruturada. Os dados, após análise temática, foram apresentados em três categorias representativas dos elementos da tríade de Donabedian, ou seja, estrutura, processo e resultado. A categoria 1 realçou a reconfiguração da estrutura hospitalar a partir da gestão de materiais e das pessoas; a categoria 2 abordou a reestruturação do processo de trabalho para alcance das metas com segurança e qualidade; e a categoria 3 focou nas experiências dos enfermeiros na descrição dos resultados alcançados e esperados. A análise evidenciou a importância do trabalho em equipe, do envolvimento e da adaptação do gestor diante dos desafios da doença nova e ameaçadora da vida, dos recursos escassos e da complexidade das relações humanas na crise. Na liderança transformacional esses enfermeiros incentivaram a mudança de comportamento, o crescimento profissional, e resiliência.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Leadership , Nurse's Role , Nursing Staff, Hospital , Humans , COVID-19/nursing , COVID-19/epidemiology , Nursing Staff, Hospital/psychology , Nursing Staff, Hospital/organization & administration , Qualitative Research , Interviews as Topic , Hospital Administration , Female , Adult , Hospital Restructuring/organization & administration , Male
9.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 817, 2024 Jul 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39014429

ABSTRACT

Resilience is an organizational capacity in day-to-day practice and crisis situation performance. A one of a kind crisis for hospitals is the COVID-19 pandemic. The long duration and magnitude of this crisis offers the opportunity to gain insight into the complexity of crisis management and organizational resilience of hospitals. This interview study therefore explored the organizational resilience of Dutch hospitals during the first 14 months of the COVID-19 pandemic. Nine board members of nine Dutch hospitals were interviewed by means of a semi-structured interview that was built on thirteen indicators of organizational resilience. The results showed that board members considered their hospitals as resilient on almost all indicators. Their judgments varied about how prepared and ready for future crises they considered their hospital. According to board members, hospitals are mainly prepared for "acute" short-term crises, thanks to good crisis leadership, open communication and strong networks. A crisis as long as the COVID-19 pandemic was unprecedented and therefore more difficult to deal with. In between the infection waves, work processes were reflected upon to learn, anticipate and respond more smoothly to successive waves. However, the enduring nature of the COVD-19 crisis presented complex organizational challenges. Crisis operations were eventually scaled down and hospitals had to manage the crisis and regular care as two companies side by side. Each crisis manifests differently. Fostering trust in healthcare staff and allowing them to act autonomously during crises, while diligently monitoring external influences and potential future crises, are therefore paramount in developing organizational adaptive capacities.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Netherlands , Leadership , Hospital Administration , Interviews as Topic , Hospitals , Governing Board
10.
Int J Qual Health Care ; 36(3)2024 Jul 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38988191

ABSTRACT

Although formal preparedness for unexpected crises has long been a concern of health care policy and delivery, many hospitals struggled to manage staff and equipment shortages, precarious finances, and supply chain disruptions among other difficulties during the Coronavirus disease pandemic. Our purpose was to analyze how hospitals used formal and informal emergency management practices to maintain safe and high-quality care while responding to crisis. We conducted a qualitative study based on 26 interviews with hospital leaders and emergency managers from 12 US hospitals, purposively sampled to vary along geographic location, urban/rural delineation, size, resource availability, system membership, teaching status, and performance levels among other characteristics. In order to manage staff, space, supplies, and system- related challenges, hospitals engaged formal and informal practices around planning, teaming, and exchanging resources and information. Relying solely only on formal or informal practices proved inadequate, especially when prespecified plans, the incident command structure, and existing contracts and communication platforms failed to support resilient response. We identified emergent capabilities-imaginative planning, recombinant teaming, and transformational exchange-through which hospitals achieved harmonious interplay between the formal and informal practices of emergency management that supported safe care and resilience amid crisis. Managing emergent challenges for and amid crisis calls for health care delivery organizations to engage creative planning processes, enable motivated workers with diverse skill sets to team up, and establish rich inter- and intra-organizational partnerships that support vital exchange.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , United States , Qualitative Research , SARS-CoV-2 , Hospital Administration , Disaster Planning/organization & administration , Quality of Health Care/organization & administration , Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Pandemics
11.
BMJ Open ; 14(7): e085655, 2024 Jul 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38991677

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this scoping review is to identify evidence of the impact of hospital managers in top management (c-suite) on hospital performance. Managers generally have various effects on organisational objectives of their organisations. In recent years, the healthcare sector has experienced alterations in hospital governance structures, together with the emergence of new c-suite positions, aligning more closely with those found in private organisations. Their impact on hospital performance (ie, quality of care) is not well known. This scoping review seeks to identify all the available evidence of their impact on the organisational objectives. This scoping review will include primary studies, reviews and commentaries that describe the impact of top management team members on organisational outcomes in a hospital setting. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The search strategy aims to locate both published and unpublished documents (ie, grey literature) using a three-step search strategy. An exploratory search of Medline and Google Scholar identified keywords and Medical Subject Headings terms. A second search of Medline (PubMed), Web of Science Core Collection, ScienceDirect, Business Source Premier (EBScoHost), JSTOR, BASE, Lens.org and the Google Search Engine will be performed. The scope of the search will cover 1990-present time using English search terms. Manual searching by two reviewers will be added to the search strategy. The identified documents will be independently screened, selected by two researchers and extracted by one researcher. The data are then presented in tables and graphics coupled with a descriptive summary. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As this study neither involves human participants nor unpublished secondary data, an ethics approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated through professional networks, conference presentations and publication in a scientific journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The protocol was registered on the Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/EBKUP).


Subject(s)
Hospitals , Humans , Hospital Administration/methods , Hospitals/standards , Organizational Objectives , Quality of Health Care , Research Design , Review Literature as Topic
12.
Health Informatics J ; 30(2): 14604582241259336, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38848696

ABSTRACT

Keeping track of data semantics and data changes in the databases is essential to support retrospective studies and the reproducibility of longitudinal clinical analysis by preventing false conclusions from being drawn from outdated data. A knowledge model combined with a temporal model plays an essential role in organizing the data and improving query expressiveness across time and multiple institutions. This paper presents a modelling framework for temporal relational databases using an ontology to derive a shareable and interoperable data model. The framework is based on: OntoRela an ontology-driven database modelling approach and Unified Historicization Framework a temporal database modelling approach. The method was applied to hospital organizational structures to show the impact of tracking organizational changes on data quality assessment, healthcare activities and data access rights. The paper demonstrated the usefulness of an ontology to provide a formal, interoperable, and reusable definition of entities and their relationships, as well as the adequacy of the temporal database to store, trace, and query data over time.


Subject(s)
Databases, Factual , Humans , Hospital Administration/methods , Data Management/methods
13.
Health Policy ; 146: 105115, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38924862

ABSTRACT

Climate change is a pressing issue that has a negative impact on the planet but also on public health. The healthcare sector contributes to environmental pollution, while it aims to improve health. Therefore, its environmental sustainability should be improved. This study focuses on the governance of sustainability in hospitals, since hospitals are the largest operational units in the healthcare system and can therefore make a large impact. To successfully implement and embed sustainable development through the hospital, the right governance approach is needed. This systematic literature review aims to give an overview of governance related factors that influence the implementation of sustainable development in hospitals in Europe. Following PRISMA guidelines, 2426 papers were identified and screened of which 30 were included in the analysis. In these papers, four governance related factors were identified to be important for the implementation of sustainable development in the hospital: knowledge, involvement from management, commitment from healthcare professionals, and technology use. These factors currently mostly form barriers in the implementation process. Future research is recommended on how to practically deploy these factors as facilitators for implementation. Since both involvement from management and commitment from healthcare professionals are crucial factors, further research should look into combining the input of these stakeholders in policy development.


Subject(s)
Sustainable Development , Humans , Europe , Hospitals , Climate Change , Hospital Administration , Health Policy
14.
BMC Emerg Med ; 24(1): 105, 2024 Jun 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38914937

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In the health system, hospitals are intricate establishments that offer vital medical services. Their resilience plays a crucial role in mitigating the societal repercussions of disasters. A hospital must possess the capacity to withstand risks, preserve its fundamental structure and operations, and enhance its preparedness by augmenting various capabilities and promptly recovering from the impacts of potential risks. It enables the hospital to attain a heightened level of readiness. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a resilience model tailored for hospitals to navigate crises and disasters effectively. METHODS: This mixed-method study was conducted in 2023 in three phases: (1) Identification of the factors influencing the organizational resilience of the hospital, (2) Evaluation of the influential factors by an expert panel. (3) Following the standardization process, we administered 371 questionnaires to individuals, such as university staff managers and supervisors, nursing managers, and research unit managers. The sample size was determined by multiplying the components by 10, resulting in 360 (10 * 36). Therefore, we selected a sample size of 371 participants. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was employed to examine the causal relationships between variables. These steps were performed using SPSS 25.0 and AMOS 22 software. Finally, we identified and presented the final model. We utilized AMOS 22 and applied the SEM to assess the correlation between the variables, with a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS: Findings indicate that the appropriate modeling identified five dimensions comprising 36 components. These dimensions include vulnerability, preparedness, support management, responsiveness and adaptability, and recovery after the disaster. The model demonstrates a good fit, as indicated by the X2/d indices with a value of 2.202, a goodness of fit index (GFI) of 0.832, a root mean square error of estimation (RMSEA) of 0.057, an adjusted comparative fit index (CFI) of 0.931, and a smoothed fit index (NFI) of 0.901. CONCLUSION: Enhancing hospital resilience is crucial for effective preparedness and response to accidents and disasters. Developing a localized tool for measuring resilience can help identify vulnerabilities, ensure service continuity, and inform rehabilitation programs. The proposed model is a suitable framework for assessing hospital resilience. Key factors include human resource scarcity, hospital specialization, and trauma center capacity. Hospitals should prioritize efficient resource allocation, information technology infrastructure, in-service training, waste management, and a proactive organizational framework to build resilience. By adopting this approach, hospitals can better respond to crises and disasters, ultimately reducing casualties and improving overall preparedness.


Subject(s)
Disaster Planning , Humans , Disaster Planning/organization & administration , Surveys and Questionnaires , Resilience, Psychological , Models, Organizational , Disasters , Hospital Administration , Hospitals , Emergencies
15.
Health Care Manage Rev ; 49(3): 161-175, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38709000

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although all hospitals aim to deliver high-quality care, there is considerable variation in their adoption of quality management (QM) practices. Organizational and environmental factors are known to drive strategic decision-making in hospitals, but their impact on the adoption of QM practices remains unclear. PURPOSE: Our study aims to identify multiple organizational and environmental factors that explain variation in the adoption of QM practices among hospitals and to explore mechanisms underlying these relationships. METHODOLOGY: We conducted a two-phase, sequential mixed-methods study of German acute care hospitals. The quantitative phase used between-effects regressions to identify factors explaining variation in the number of QM practices adopted by hospitals from 2015 to 2019. The qualitative phase used semistructured interviews with quality managers to gain in-depth insights. RESULTS: The number of QM practices adopted by a hospital was significantly associated with factors like hospital size and the presence of an emergency department or QM steering committee. Our qualitative findings highlighted potential mechanisms such as the presence of an emergency department serving as a proxy for organizational complexity or urgency of case-mix. CONCLUSION: We provide an overview of factors driving QM adoption in hospitals, extending beyond the focus on single factors in previous research. Future studies could explore additional factors highlighted by our interviewees. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Our results can inform interventions to strengthen QM in hospitals and guide future research on this topic.


Subject(s)
Hospitals , Humans , Hospitals/standards , Germany , Hospital Administration , Qualitative Research , Interviews as Topic , Quality of Health Care , Quality Improvement , Total Quality Management
16.
Int J Qual Health Care ; 36(2)2024 Jun 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38804900

ABSTRACT

Substantial evidence indicates that leadership plays a critical role in an organization's success. Our study aims to conduct case studies on leadership attributes among China's five top-performing hospitals, examining their common practices. A semi-structured interview was conducted with 8 leaders, 39 managers, 19 doctors, and 16 nurses from the five sample hospitals in China. We collected information from these hospitals on the role of senior leadership, organizational governance, and social responsibility, aligning with the leadership assessment guidelines in the Baldrige Excellence Framework. Qualitative data underwent interpretation through content analysis, thematic analysis, and comparative analysis. This study adhered to the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research guidelines for reporting qualitative research. Our study revealed that the leaders of the five top-performing hospitals in China consistently established "Patient Needs First" as the core element of the hospital culture. Striving to build world-renowned hospitals with Chinese characteristics, the interviewees all believed strongly in scientific vigor, professionalism, and cooperative culture. The leaders adhered to a staff-centered approach, placing special emphasis on talent recruitment and development, creating a compensation system, and fostering a supportive environment conducive to enhancing medical knowledge, skills, and professional ethics. In terms of organizational governance, they continuously enhanced the communication between various departments and levels of staff, improved the quality and safety of medical care, and focused on innovative medical and scientific research, thereby establishing evidence-based, standardized hospital management with a feedback loop. Meanwhile, regarding social responsibility, they prioritized improvements in the quality of healthcare by providing international and domestic medical assistance, community outreach, and other programs. To a large extent, the excellent leadership of China's top-performing hospitals can be attributed to their commitment to a "Two-Pillared Hospital Culture," which prioritizes putting patient needs first and adopting a staff-centered approach. Furthermore, the leaders of these hospitals emphasize hospital performance, operations management, and social responsibility.


Subject(s)
Hospital Administration , Leadership , Organizational Culture , China , Humans , Hospital Administration/standards , Qualitative Research , Social Responsibility , Hospitals/standards , Interviews as Topic , Hospital Administrators
17.
J Health Organ Manag ; 38(9): 143-156, 2024 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38584370

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: While transition programs are widely used to facilitate newly graduated nurses transition to healthcare settings, knowledge about preconditions for implementing such programs in the hospital context is scarce. The purpose of this study was to explore program coordinators' perspectives on implementing a transition program for newly graduated nurses. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: An explorative qualitative study using individual interviews. Total of 11 program coordinators at five acute care hospital administrations in a south-west region in Sweden. Data was subjected to thematic analysis, using NVivo software to promote coding. FINDINGS: The following two themes were identified from the analysis: Create a shared responsibility for introducing newly graduated nurses, and establish legitimacy of the program. The implementation process was found to be a matter of both educational content and anchoring work in the hospital organization. To clarify the what and why of implementing a transition program, where the nurses learning processes are prioritized, was foundational prerequisites for successful implementation. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: This paper illustrates that implementing transition programs in contemporary hospital care context is a valuable but complex process that involves conflicting priorities. A program that is well integrated in the organization, in which responsibilities between different levels and roles in the hospital organization, aims and expectations on the program are clarified, is important to achieve the intentions of effective transition to practice. Joint actions need to be taken by healthcare policymakers, hospitals and ward managers, and educational institutions to support the implementation of transition programs as a long-term strategy for nurses entering hospital care.


Subject(s)
Hospital Administration , Nurses , Humans , Qualitative Research , Delivery of Health Care , Learning , Hospitals
18.
Health Care Manag Sci ; 27(2): 284-312, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38438649

ABSTRACT

This study reviews scholarly publications on data envelopment analysis (DEA) studies on acute care hospital (ACH) efficiency published between 1984 and 2022 in scholarly peer-reviewed journals. We employ systematic literature review (SLR) method to identify and analyze pertinent past research using predetermined steps. The SLR offers a comprehensive resource that meticulously analyzes DEA methodology for practitioners and researchers focusing on ACH efficiency measurement. The articles reviewed in the SLR are analyzed and synthesized based on the nature of the DEA modelling process and the key findings from the DEA models. The key findings from the DEA models are presented under the following sections: effects of different ownership structures; impacts of specific healthcare reforms or other policy interventions; international and multi-state comparisons; effects of changes in competitive environment; impacts of new technology implementations; effects of hospital location; impacts of quality management interventions; impact of COVID-19 on hospital performance; impact of teaching status, and impact of merger. Furthermore, the nature of DEA modelling process focuses on use of sensitivity analysis; choice of inputs and outputs; comparison with Stochastic Frontier Analysis; use of congestion analysis; use of bootstrapping; imposition of weight restrictions; use of DEA window analysis; and exogenous factors. The findings demonstrate that, despite several innovative DEA extensions and hospital applications, over half of the research used the conventional DEA models. The findings also show that the most often used inputs in the DEA models were labor-oriented inputs and hospital beds, whereas the most frequently used outputs were outpatient visits, followed by surgeries, admissions, and inpatient days. Further research on the impact of healthcare reforms and health information technology (HIT) on hospital performance is required, given the number of reforms being implemented in many countries and the role HIT plays in enhancing care quality and lowering costs. We conclude by offering several new research directions for future studies.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Efficiency, Organizational , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Hospitals , Hospital Administration/methods
19.
Health Care Manag Sci ; 27(2): 208-222, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38446320

ABSTRACT

This paper addresses the management of patients' transportation requests within a hospital, a very challenging problem where requests must be scheduled among the available porters so that patients arrive at their destination timely and the resources invested in patient transport are kept as low as possible. Transportation requests arrive during the day in an unpredictable manner, so they need to be scheduled in real-time. To ensure that the requests are scheduled in the best possible manner, one should also reconsider the decisions made on pending requests that have not yet been completed, a process that will be referred to as rescheduling. This paper proposes several policies to trigger and execute the rescheduling of pending requests and three approaches (a mathematical formulation, a constructive heuristic, and a local search heuristic) to solve each rescheduling problem. A simulation tool is proposed to assess the performance of the rescheduling strategies and the proposed scheduling methods to tackle instances inspired by a real mid-size hospital. Compared to a heuristic that mimics the way requests are currently handled in our partner hospital, the best combination of scheduling method and rescheduling strategy produces an average 5.7 minutes reduction in response time and a 13% reduction in the percentage of late requests. Furthermore, since the total distance walked by porters is substantially reduced, our experiments demonstrate that it is possible to reduce the number of porters - and therefore the operating costs - without reducing the current level of service.


Subject(s)
Efficiency, Organizational , Transportation of Patients , Humans , Time Factors , Computer Simulation , Heuristics , Hospital Administration/methods
20.
PLoS One ; 19(3): e0300985, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38536811

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hospitals should have effective and efficient organizational charts to face the changing healthcare environment. Thus, for this purpose, the present study seeks to compile an organizational chart for Iranian hospitals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study was conducted in two phase overview and qualitative (using focus group discussion). In the overview phase, the organizational charts of hospitals were analyzed in terms of complexity (i.e., degree of horizontal and vertical separations), and the initial hospital organizational chart was developed based on the results. Subsequently, experts were interviewed in a focus group discussion to finalize and validate the initial organizational chart. RESULTS: The final organizational chart was designed to contain features such as internal divisions, specialization, reduction of organizational hierarchies, expansion of supervision scope, and moderate-sized organizational pyramid. CONCLUSION: Using designed organizational chart would eliminate the redundant managerial levels since it reduces organizational hierarchies to two levels of management, expands the supervision scopes, fosters a moderate-sized organizational pyramid, and catalyzes communications.


Subject(s)
Hospital Administration , Hospitals , Iran , Delivery of Health Care , Focus Groups
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL