Effect of Brexpiprazole on Prolactin and Sexual Functioning: An Analysis of Short- and Long-Term Study Data in Major Depressive Disorder.

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: Evidence supports use of adjunctive atypical antipsychotics in major depressive disorder (MDD). Impaired sexual functioning is common in MDD and may be worsened by antipsychotic adverse effects. We evaluated the effect of brexpiprazole on prolactin and sexual functioning in patients with MDD. METHODS/PROCEDURES: In short-term studies, patients received adjunctive brexpiprazole 1, 2, or 3 mg or placebo. The long-term study was a flexible-dose (0.5-3 mg/d) open-label extension (OLE). Change from baseline and shifts in prolactin status and prolactin-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed. Sexual functioning was assessed by the Massachusetts General Hospital Sexual Functioning Questionnaire. FINDINGS/RESULTS: Median changes in prolactin levels from baseline to week 6 in short-term studies were as follows: brexpiprazole, 5.99 ng/mL (females) and 1.61 ng/mL (males); placebo, -0.15 ng/mL (females) and -0.08 ng/mL (males).Median changes from baseline to week 52 in the OLE were as follows: 0.27 ng/mL (females) and 0.27 ng/mL (males). Prolactin levels in patients with baseline prolactin greater than 1× upper limit of normal values tended to decrease over time.The proportion of brexpiprazole-treated patients with greater than 3× upper limit of normal postbaseline prolactin values in short-term studies for both sexes was low (0%-0.3%) and did not differ from placebo: OLE, 0.5% (females) and 0.8% (males).In short-term studies, the incidence of prolactin-related TEAEs was 3.1% for brexpiprazole and 0.7% for placebo (OLE, 3.1%). There were overall numerical improvements from baseline in sexual functioning for females and males after short- and long-term brexpiprazole treatment, with statistically significant improvements for brexpiprazole versus placebo in females on the items 'interest in sex' (-0.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.33 to -0.05; P = 0.0074), 'sexually aroused' (-0.17; 95% CI, -0.30 to -0.03; P = 0.0154), and 'overall sexual satisfaction' (-0.16; 95% CI, -0.30 to -0.03; P = 0.0184). IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: There were small changes in prolactin levels, low proportions of patients with postbaseline elevated prolactin values, low incidences of prolactin-related TEAEs, and modest improvements in sexual functioning with adjunctive brexpiprazole in MDD.

Body self-image disturbances in women with prolactinoma

Objective: To evaluate body dissatisfaction and distorted body self-image in women with prolactinoma. Methods: Body dissatisfaction and distorted body self-image were evaluated in 80 women with prolactinoma. All patients were in menacme, 34% had normal body mass index (BMI), and 66% were overweight. Most patients (56.2%) had normal prolactin (PRL) levels and no hyperprolactinemia symptoms (52.5%). The Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ) was used to assess the patients' dissatisfaction with and concern about their physical form, and the Stunkard Figure Rating Scale (FRS) was used to assess body dissatisfaction and distorted body self-image. The patients were divided according to PRL level (normal vs. elevated) and the presence or absence of prolactinoma symptoms. Results: The normal and elevated PRL groups had similar incidences of body dissatisfaction and distorted body self-image. However, symptomatic patients reported a higher incidence of dissatisfaction than asymptomatic patients. Distorted body self-image was less common among symptomatic patients. Conclusion: Symptomatic patients showed higher body dissatisfaction, but lower body self-image distortion. The presence of symptoms may have been responsible for increased body awareness. The perception of body shape could have triggered feelings of dissatisfaction compared to an ideal lean body. Therefore, a distorted body self-image might not necessarily result in body dissatisfaction in women with prolactinomas.

Body self-image disturbances in women with prolactinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate body dissatisfaction and distorted body self-image in women with prolactinoma. METHODS: Body dissatisfaction and distorted body self-image were evaluated in 80 women with prolactinoma. All patients were in menacme, 34% had normal body mass index (BMI), and 66% were overweight. Most patients (56.2%) had normal prolactin (PRL) levels and no hyperprolactinemia symptoms (52.5%). The Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ) was used to assess the patients' dissatisfaction with and concern about their physical form, and the Stunkard Figure Rating Scale (FRS) was used to assess body dissatisfaction and distorted body self-image. The patients were divided according to PRL level (normal vs. elevated) and the presence or absence of prolactinoma symptoms. RESULTS: The normal and elevated PRL groups had similar incidences of body dissatisfaction and distorted body self-image. However, symptomatic patients reported a higher incidence of dissatisfaction than asymptomatic patients. Distorted body self-image was less common among symptomatic patients. CONCLUSION: Symptomatic patients showed higher body dissatisfaction, but lower body self-image distortion. The presence of symptoms may have been responsible for increased body awareness. The perception of body shape could have triggered feelings of dissatisfaction compared to an ideal lean body. Therefore, a distorted body self-image might not necessarily result in body dissatisfaction in women with prolactinomas.

Prolactin levels in drug-naïve first episode nonaffective psychosis patients compared with healthy controls. Sex differences.

Recent studies have found hyperprolactinemia in first episode psychotic patients that had not previously received antipsychotic treatment (drug-naïve). Our goal was to learn whether there were differences in baseline prolactin concentrations between drug-naïve psychotic patients and healthy controls, as well as to study possible gender differences in the prolactin elevation. A cross-sectional study was conducted that included 61 drug-naïve psychosis patients and 45 healthy controls (aged between 14-55 years old). A blood sample was extracted between 8 and 10 a.m. Prolactin levels and TSH were determined. The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) was conducted across the sample. This study showed significantly higher levels of prolactin in drug-naïve patients compared to healthy controls. These results were maintained after controlling prolactin levels for sex, age, THC consumption, baseline TSH, and PSS. A significant correlation between prolactin and PSS was not observed. Significant differences in prolactin levels between men and women were not observed. These results are clinically important because if elevated baseline prolactin levels are detected in these patients, it will be necessary to initiate neuroleptics that do not increase this hormone. There was no evidence that stress was related to an increase in prolactin at the onset of psychosis.

Plasma prolactin levels are associated with the severity of illness in drug-naive first-episode psychosis female patients.

Patients with schizophrenia frequently present hyperprolactinemia as a consequence of antipsychotic treatment. However, an increase in circulating prolactin levels has also been shown in patients without previous treatment. Our objective was to compare prolactin levels between antipsychotic-naive first-episode psychosis (AN-FEP) patients and healthy controls (HC). As part of an FEP program (Programa Asistencial Fases Iniciales de Psicosis [PAFIP]), 270 AN-FEP patients and 153 HC were eligible for this study. Serum prolactin levels were measured by an automated immunochemiluminescent assay. Subjects' sex and having an AN-FEP diagnosis both had an effect on prolactin levels, with higher levels in women than in men, and in AN-FEP patients than in HC. Moreover, plasma prolactin levels showed a negative correlation with the SAPS scores in AN-FEP female patients. AN-FEP patients have increased levels of prolactin, which might be stress-induced. This, together with the association of higher prolactin with a lower severity of the disease, suggests that prolactin might play a neuroprotective role, especially in women.

MANAGEMENT OF ENDOCRINE DISEASE: Impulse control disorders in patients with hyperpolactinemia treated with dopamine agonists: how much should we worry?

Dopamine agonists (DAs) represent a cornerstone in the management of patients with hyperprolactinemia and have an important role in the treatment of neurologic disorders, including Parkinson's disease and restless legs syndrome. A growing body of evidence has identified impulse control disorders (ICDs) as possible adverse effects of DA therapy. A variety of ICDs may occur in patients treated with DA, including compulsive shopping, pathologic gambling, stealing, hypersexuality and punding (repetitive performance of tasks, such as collecting, sorting, disassembling and assembling objects). These behaviors can have devastating effects on patients' life and family. In the present review article, we summarize available data on ICDs in patients with hyperprolactinemia as well as other disorders. Possible risk factors for the emergence of ICDs in patients treated with DA are discussed and the putative pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying the development of ICDs in this setting are reviewed. In addition, strategies for the early identification and management of ICDs in patients on DA are discussed. In conclusion, a wide variety of ICDs can occur in patients treated with DA, including those with hyperprolactinemia. The development of ICDs can have serious implications for patients' well-being and family. Endocrinologists and other physicians involved in the care of patients on DA therapy must be aware of this potential adverse effect, counsel patients regarding pertinent symptoms and regularly evaluate treated patients for the development of ICDs. Early detection of ICDs and discontinuation of DA therapy can mitigate the potential harms associated with ICDs in these patients.

Hyperprolactinemia and insulin resistance in drug naive patients with early onset first episode psychosis.

BACKGROUND: Hyperprolactinemia and glucose and lipid metabolism abnormalities are often found in patients with schizophrenia and are generally considered secondary to the use of antipsychotic drugs. More recent studies have shown these same neuroendocrine and metabolic abnormalities in antipsychotic naïve patients with first episode psychosis (FEP), rising the hypothesis that schizophrenia itself may be related to an abnormal regulation of prolactin secretion and to impaired glucose tolerance. The aim of this study was to compare prolactin levels, glycometabolism parameters and lipid profile between a sample of 31 drug-naive adolescents in the acute phase of FEP and a control group of 23 subjects at clinical high risk (CHR) of developing psychosis. METHODS: The assessment involved anthropometric data (weight, height, BMI index, pubertal stage) and blood tests (levels of glucose, glycated hemoglobin, serum insulin, triglycerides, total and fractionated cholesterol, prolactin). Insulin resistance (IR) was calculated through the homeostatic model of assessment (HOMA-IR), assuming a cut-off point of 3.16 for adolescent population. FEP patients and CHR controls were compared by using Student's t-distribution (t-test) for parametric data. P < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Significant higher level of prolactin was found in FEP group than in CHR group (mean = 28.93 ± 27.16 vs 14.29 ± 7.86, P = 0.009), suggesting a condition of hyperprolactinemia (HPRL). Patients with FEP were more insulin resistant compared to patients at CHR, as assessed by HOMA-IR (mean = 3.07 ± 1.76 vs 2.11 ± 1.11, P = 0.043). Differences of fasting glucose (FEP = 4.82 ± 0.71, CHR = 4.35 ± 0.62, P = 0.016) and HbA1c (FEP = 25.86 ± 13.31, CHR = 33.00 ± 2.95, P = 0.013), were not clinically significant as the mean values were within normal range for both groups. No significant differences were found for lipid profile. A BMI value within the range of normal weight was found for both groups, with no significant differences. CONCLUSION: We suggested that HPRL, increase in HOMA-IR, and psychotic symptoms may be considered different manifestations of the acute onset of schizophrenia spectrum psychosis, with a common neurobiological vulnerability emerging since adolescence. The influence of age and gender on clinical manifestations of psychotic onset should be considered for early prevention and treatment of both schizophrenia spectrum psychosis and neuroendocrine-metabolic dysfunctions.

Relation between serum prolactin levels and antipsychotic response to risperidone in patients with schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: Hyperprolactinemia is commonly seen in patients with schizophrenia on risperidone. Dopamine receptor blockade plays a major role in risperidone induced hyperprolactinemia. However, limited studies are available with inconsistent results on antipsychotic response to risperidone and prolactin elevation. Therefore, we aimed to study the change in serum prolactin levels and response to risperidone and to test the association between DRD2 genetic variants and prolactin levels in schizophrenic patients treated with risperidone. METHODS: A prospective study comprising of 102 patients with schizophrenia were recruited. Prolactin levels and Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) score were recorded at baseline and after four weeks of risperidone treatment. Prolactin concentrations were measured by standard method Advia-Centaur® Chemiluminescence immuno assay method. Taq1A DRD2 genotyping was performed by qRT-PCR. RESULTS: The mean±SD prolactin levels (ng/ml) were increased after four weeks of treatment in both responders (males 21.66±15.15 to 41.63±18.73; p<0.01 females 51.92±40.89 to 122.35±52.16; p<0.01) and non-responders group (males 23.89±14.85 to 37.45±13.5; p<0.01 females 39.25±26.94 to 91.13±54.31; p<0.01). Patients with increased prolactin concentration were 4.6 fold higher in responders (OR 4.60; 95%CI 1.376-15.389; p-value 0.01) compared to non-responders. Ninety-six patients were genotyped for Taq1A DRD2 gene (AA=9, AG=46, GG=41) and found no association (p=0.6) between genetic variants and response to risperidone. CONCLUSION: Patients were showing more than 20% increase in prolactin levels had a better chance of responding to risperidone therapy. Taq1A DRD2 gene did not show any association with prolactin elevation and response to risperidone.

Sexual function and depressive symptoms in young women with elevated macroprolactin content: a pilot study.

Elevated prolactin levels seem to be associated with impaired sexuality. The clinical significance of macroprolactinemia, associated with the predominance of high molecular mass circulating forms of prolactin, is still poorly understood. This study was aimed at investigating sexual function in young women with macroprolactinemia. The study enrolled 14 young women with macroprolactinemia, 14 with increased monomeric prolactin levels, as well as 14 age- and weight-matched healthy women. All patients completed a questionnaire evaluating female sexual function (Female Sexual Function Index-FSFI), as well as a questionnaire assessing the presence and severity of depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition-BDI-II). Apart from total prolactin levels and macroprolactin content, circulating levels of thyrotropin, total testosterone, and 17-ß estradiol were also measured. Patients with elevated monomeric prolactin levels had a lower total FSFI score, as well as lower scores for all domains: sexual desire, sexual arousal, lubrication, orgasm, sexual satisfaction, and dyspareunia. These scores correlated with total and monomeric prolactin levels. In turn, women with macroprolactinemia were characterized by a lower score for sexual desire, and only this score correlated with total prolactin levels and macroprolactin content. The total score in the BDI-II questionnaire was higher in patients with hyper- and macroprolactinemia than in the control subjects. Contrary to multidimensional impairment of sexual function in women with elevated monomeric prolactin, macroprolactinemia only seems to disturb sexual desire.

Emotionally induced galactorrhoea in a non-lactating female--"Pseudo- Lactation"?

BACKGROUND: Galactorrhoea is a common clinical problem in endocrinology. Visual and auditory cues from the newborn are known to stimulate prolactin secretion in lactating women. However, hyperprolactinaemia and galactorrhoea in a non-lactating female due to visual and auditory stimuli from an unrelated newborn has not been reported in the past. We report the first such case of 'pseudo-lactation'. CASE PRESENTATION: An 18-year-old girl with type 1 diabetes mellitus presented with galactorrhoea. Apparently galactorrhoea was preceded by seeing the baby, hearing her cries or when remembering her memories. Her menstrual cycles were normal and did not complain of any headache or visual disturbances. She was only on metformin and insulin. Symptoms have rapidly resolved after the newborn was shifted to another location. Examination revealed scanty nipple discharge with gentle pressure. Investigations revealed an elevated serum prolactin of 62.5 ng/mL (2717.4 pmol/L) and fasting plasma glucose of 142 mg/dL (7.9 mmol/L) and HbA1c of 7.6%. Her thyroid function was normal and MRI at the time of galactorrhoea was not available. At 3 months prolactin was normal and MRI revealed only a slight asymmetry of the pituitary without evidence of microadenoma. CONCLUSION: The strong temporal relationship between her symptoms and emotional attachment to the newborn with exclusion of other causes on clinical, biochemical and radiological evidence, raise the possibility that transient hyperprolactinaemia was due to a transient lactotroph hyperplasia and hyper function which had been triggered by the stimulatory cues from the newborn.Emotionally induced "pseudo lactation" may be a rare but important cause for transient hyperprolactinaemia in a non-lactating female.

[Etiopathogeny of the delusion of pregnancy using a literature review: Role of hyperprolactinemia and application of the theory of abductive inference]. / Étiopathogénie des délires de grossesse à partir d'une revue de la littérature : rôle de l'hyperprolactinémie et application de la théorie de l'inférence abductive.

INTRODUCTION: Delusions of pregnancy are not well known. The delusion of pregnancy is defined as the belief of being pregnant despite factual evidence to the contrary. The clinical picture is heterogeneous (duration, mechanisms, topics and pre-existing psychiatric disorders). Several causes have been proposed to explain the occurrence of the delusions of pregnancy: cenesthetic theory, hyperprolactinemia, polydipsia and psychodynamic conflicts. Hyperprolactinemia is an interesting hypothesis (physiologic increase during pregnancy and similar manifestations in the course of gestation). The abductive inference theory is a probabilistic model that can clarify the role of hyperprolactinemia in the delusions of pregnancy. The purpose of this paper is to study the role of hyperprolactinemia in the delusions of pregnancy using a literature review. The abductive inference model is used to specify the etiopathogeny of this pathology. METHODS: A research in Medline, Sudoc, BIUM and PSYLINK using the following key words "delusional pregnancy" or "delusion of pregnancy" and "hyperprolactinemia" was conducted. RESULTS: Three articles (case reports) about delusions of pregnancy associated with hyperprolactinemia were found. The cases have some similitudes. First of all, they have similar chronology: delusion appears at the same time as hyperprolactinemia and resolves with biological normalization. Secondly, hyperprolactinemia is always caused by a neuroleptic (haloperidol, olanzapine, risperidone). Concerning pre-existing disorders, a psychiatric pathology for each case was found (schizophrenia, schizo-affective disorder and bipolar disorder). Chronology, reproductivity and reversibility are strong arguments to involve hyperprolactinemia in the delusions of pregnancy (Bradford Hill criteria). Furthermore, this association is biologically plausible: physiologic increase during pregnancy (gestational signal), similar symptoms to those during pregnancy and the role in parental behavior (parental signal). Nevertheless, not everyone with hyperprolactinemia will develop a delusion of pregnancy; the interaction is more complex (non linear); the theory of abductive inference clarifies this relationship. THEORY OF ABDUCTIVE INFERENCE: Abductive inference is a probabilistic model whose goal is to explain the occurrence of delusional beliefs. The first factor is the abnormal data. The second factor is the cognitive process (abductive inference), which uses Bayes' theorem to select the most likely hypothesis to explain the abnormal data. In the delusion of pregnancy, abnormal data is the hyperprolactinemia, signal of gestation without pregnancy. Hypotheses in order to explain this signal are then produced (pregnancy or no pregnancy). In the second part, probabilities associated with each hypothesis, given the hyperprolactinemia, are compared. Since hyperprolactinemia is a gestational signal, the pregnancy hypothesis is most likely. Probabilities associated with each hypothesis without taking hyperprolactinemia into account are compared (prior probability). Since any element of reality indicates a pregnancy, the absence of pregnancy is most likely. In the last step, the posterior probability is calculated using the first two comparisons. The probability associated with the pregnancy hypothesis (taking into account hyperprolactinemia) is relatively higher than the probability associated with the no-pregnancy hypothesis (without taking into account hyperprolactinemia). So, the posterior probability associated with the pregnancy hypothesis is more likely than the posterior probability associated with the no-pregnancy hypothesis. Thus, the subject believes in a pregnancy. CONCLUSION: The research and the treatment of hyperprolactinemia must be conducted when faced with a delusion of pregnancy.

Delusion of pregnancy in a drug-naïve young woman showing hyperprolactinemia and hypothyroidism: a case report.

The present article reports the case of a delusional pregnancy that developed in a drug-naïve young woman affected by paranoid schizophrenia and Hashimoto-related hyperprolactinemia. The literature in this field has addressed the phenomenon of distorted thoughts of pregnancy being elicited by physical changes due to drug-induced hyperprolactinemia. The present report gives account of a case of delusional pregnancy that developed in a schizophrenic patient with concurrent hyperprolactinemia induced by a primary endocrine disease. In this instance, however, amelioration of delusional beliefs did not ensue from hyperprolactinemia normalization, but was mostly due to cognitive restructuring of distorted thinking (together with the antipsychotic treatment). This finding confirms the importance of considering the key role of the interaction of biological, cognitive and psychological mechanisms in the construction of inaccurate beliefs and feelings about pregnancy.

Effects of cabergoline on hyperprolactinemia, psychopathology, and sexual functioning in schizophrenic patients.

Antipsychotic medications are associated to different degrees with sexual dysfunction mainly through their potential to induce hyperprolactinemia. Prolactin (PRL) secretion is mainly regulated by the hypothalamic dopaminergic systems. We conducted this 6-month, parallel-group study to prospectively investigate the effects of the dopamine agonist cabergoline on sexual dysfunction in clinically stable patients with schizophrenia (DSM-IV, AP 194) and hyperprolactinemia (PRL > 20 ng/ml for men and PRL > 25 ng/ml for women). In total 80 patients were enrolled; 33 were receiving risperidone, 17 haloperidol, 11 amisulpride, and 8 risperidone microspheres long acting. Based on PRL levels (< 50, 50-99, or > 100 ng/ml), patients were assigned in 3 cabergoline doses (0.25, 0.5, and 1 mg/day in 38, 23, and 19 patients, respectively). The psychopathology was evaluated using the Positive and Negative Syndrom Scale (PANSS), and sexual dysfunction was evaluated using the Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale (ASEX). PRL levels were reduced in all patients, from 73.3 (± 46.8) to 42.0 (± 27.8) at Month 3 and 27.1 (± 20.4) at Month 6 (p < .001). ASEX scores declined from 19.1 (± 5.1) to 17.6 (± 5.5) at Month 3 and 15.0 (± 6.5) at Month 6 (p < .001). PANSS scores were reduced in the third and in the sixth month (p = .001 at 6 month vs. baseline). The decrease in PRL was not statistically different between groups. Our data suggest that cabergoline administration to clinically stable patients with schizophrenia may improve sexual functioning without adversely affecting their psychopathologic status, provided that the dose has been suited to the severity of the hyperprolactinemia.

Relationship between prolactin levels and subjective endocrine-related adverse effects in patients with schizophrenia receiving long-term treatment with amisulpride.

INTRODUCTION: We have investigated the categorical prevalence of hyperprolactinemia and examined the relationship between prolactin levels and subjective endocrine-related adverse effects in schizophrenia patients treated with amisulpride during a 1-year period. METHODS: A total of 111 patients with schizophrenia who were either started on or switched to amisulpride were assessed for prolactin levels and endocrine-related adverse effects using 6 items derived from the Liverpool University neuroleptic side-effect rating scale (LUNSERS) at baseline, 8 weeks, and 1 year. RESULTS: 10 were antipsychotic-naïve, 23 were antipsychotic free for 1 month, 54 discontinued their medication during 1 month prior to study, and 24 maintained their antipsychotics at baseline. At 1 year, hyperprolactinemia was found in 75.9% of men and 85.7% of women. Significant increases in mean prolactin levels at week 8 in both sexes were found; this was followed by a significant decrease over 1 year only in women. The proportions of both sexes with hyperprolactinemia increased from baseline to week 8 but remained unchanged at 1 year. Scores on the endocrine-related items of the LUNSERS improved significantly from baseline to week 8 in both sexes and then remained consistent during maintenance treatment. Prolactin levels were significantly higher in the group with baseline hyperprolactinemia than in the group without baseline hyperprolactinemia at all assessment points. CONCLUSIONS: Amisulpride commonly induces hyperprolactinemia. Although the percentage of patients with hyperprolactinemia remained unchanged during maintenance treatment, serum prolactin levels significantly decreased among women. Self-reported endocrine-related side effects were not associated with prolactin elevation during amisulpride treatment.

Sexual dysfunction and hyperprolactinemia in Japanese schizophrenic patients taking antipsychotics.

This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of sexual dysfunction, evaluated by the Nagoya Sexual Function Questionnaire (NSFQ), and hyperprolactinemia in patients with schizophrenia and examine a relationship between sexual dysfunction and serum prolactin levels. This cross-sectional, comparative study was performed using a sample comprising 195 Japanese schizophrenic in- and outpatients treated with antipsychotics (117 males and 78 females). Data were collected from October 2009 to January 2010 using single, cross-sectional ratings of sexual function assessed by the NSFQ and concurrent measurement of serum prolactin levels. The prevalence of sexual dysfunction in patients with schizophrenia was high (males 66.7%; females 79.5%). Hyperprolactinemia (>25ng/ml) was highly prevalent among schizophrenia patients, affecting 53.8% of females and 51.3% of males. Among female patients, 16.7% had prolactin levels>100ng/ml. There was no relationship between sexual dysfunction and serum prolactin levels. The present study demonstrated a higher prevalence of sexual dysfunction and hyperprolactinemia in Japanese schizophrenia patients. Clinicians should keep these problems in mind and discuss potential solutions with patients to improve patients' quality of life and adherence to therapy.

Diagnosis of co-morbid axis-I psychiatric disorders among women with newly diagnosed, untreated endocrine disorders.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of major depressive disorder (MDD) and other selected axis-I disorders among women with newly diagnosed, untreated endocrine disorders. METHODS: Two hundred and eighteen consecutive women, aged 18-65, with newly diagnosed, untreated endocrine disorders were referred for potential diagnosis of co-morbid axis-I disorders with the use of the Structured Clinical Interview for Axis I-Patient Edition (SCID-P). The SCID-P was re-administered after 12 weeks. RESULTS: At baseline, 64 (29.3%) women met criteria for at least one axis-I disorder. Women who were diagnosed with hyperthyroidism were more likely to meet criteria for generalized anxiety disorder and panic disorder than women without hyperthyroidism. Nine of 154 (5.8 %) women who did not meet criteria for an axis-I disorder at baseline met criteria for at least one axis-I disorder during follow-up. Among them, the presence of diabetes mellitus was statistically correlated with a higher probability of developing major depressive disorder at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Although preliminary, our findings are consistent with previous studies and suggest an increased prevalence of MDD and other axis-I disorders among women with newly diagnosed endocrine disorders, providing further evidence suggesting that women with endocrine abnormalities may be at increased risk of depression and/or anxiety disorders.

Psychosomatic symptoms as biomarkers: transcending the psyche-soma dichotomy.

Following the advancement in understanding dynamical systems, the author presents a novel metaphor of psychosomatic symptoms as low-dimensional biomarkers. This metaphor, which transcends the old binary of psyche-soma, resonates with classical psychoanalytic concepts and with Matte-Blanco's idea of repetition as indicative of dimensionality reduction. The relevance of this metaphor for explanation, diagnosis, and treatment is illustrated through a case study of a male patient suffering from hyperprolactinemia.

Effect of bromocriptine on antipsychotic drug-induced hyperprolactinemia: eight-week randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study.

AIM: The objective of the present study was to assess the efficacy and safety of bromocriptine treatment for patients with antipsychotic-drug-induced hyperprolactinemia in clinical practice. METHODS: This was an 8-week randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. Sixty female schizophrenia patients were enrolled and were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups: bromocriptine 2.5 mg/day, 5 mg/day, 10 mg/day, and placebo. Serum levels of prolactin, estradiol (E2), luteinizing hormone (LH), and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) were evaluated on three occasions (baseline, and 4 and 8 weeks after commencement of the treatment paradigm). Extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) and clinical symptoms were assessed using the Simpson-Angus scale and the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), respectively. RESULTS: Of the 60 subjects who were enrolled, 48 completed the study (n = 14, 13, 11, and 10 in the bromocriptine 2.5 mg/day, 5 mg/day, and 10 mg/day, and placebo groups, respectively). Four patients in the 10-mg/day group, two in the 5-mg/day group, and one in the placebo group resumed menses during the study. The mean level of prolactin significantly decreased from baseline to week 4, and then plateaued, showing no significant change for the remaining 4 weeks of the study. No significant changes in LH, FSH, or E2 levels were observed throughout the 8-week study period, either within or between groups. CONCLUSION: Administration of bromocriptine is a safe method for treating antipsychotic-drug-induced hyperprolactinemia without exacerbating either psychotic symptoms or EPS.

Antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinaemia in patients with schizophrenia: considerations in relation to bone mineral density.

Schizophrenia affects about 1% of the world's population. Those with schizophrenia are at elevated risk of a variety of physical health conditions, including diabetes, coronary heart disease, hypertension and osteoporosis. Osteoporosis secondary to antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinaemia (i.e. raised prolactin levels) has received little attention, when compared with reports on metabolic syndrome for instance. A recent study established that schizophrenia and prolactin-raising antipsychotic medication is directly associated with hip fractures. This is important and concerning as osteoporotic fractures are associated with much morbidity and mortality. This paper reviews the literature on antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinaemia and its subsequent effects on bone mineral density.