Severe postural hypotension and sinus bradycardia with thalidomide in patients with erythema nodosum leprosum.

Two men in their 60s and 40s were diagnosed with erythema nodosum leprosum based on the development of recurrent painful ulcers and nodules, respectively, for the previous 6 months. Thalidomide 100 mg four times a day, along with MB-MDT, was started in both patients. Both patients experienced severe dizziness on rising from a seated posture soon after initiation of thalidomide and a decrease in blood pressure and heart rate. Cardiovascular/neurology examination and routine blood investigations were normal. An autonomic nervous system assessment indicated bradycardia, postural hypotension and decreased cardiac autonomic function. The dosage of thalidomide was then gradually reduced over 4-5 days to 100 mg/day following a suspicion that thalidomide was the cause of postural hypotension. The dizziness subsided, and blood pressure and heart rate returned to normal.We concluded that thalidomide was the culprit behind bradycardia and dose- dependent postural hypotension.

Machine-learning model for the prediction of acute orthostatic hypotension after levodopa administration.

BACKGROUND: Levodopa could induce orthostatic hypotension (OH) in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. Accurate prediction of acute OH post levodopa (AOHPL) is important for rational drug use in PD patients. Here, we develop and validate a prediction model of AOHPL to facilitate physicians in identifying patients at higher probability of developing AOHPL. METHODS: The study involved 497 PD inpatients who underwent a levodopa challenge test (LCT) and the supine-to-standing test (STS) four times during LCT. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether OH occurred during levodopa effectiveness (AOHPL) or not (non-AOHPL). The dataset was randomly split into training (80%) and independent test data (20%). Several models were trained and compared for discrimination between AOHPL and non-AOHPL. Final model was evaluated on independent test data. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) values were employed to reveal how variables explain specific predictions for given observations in the independent test data. RESULTS: We included 180 PD patients without AOHPL and 194 PD patients with AOHPL to develop and validate predictive models. Random Forest was selected as our final model as its leave-one-out cross validation performance [AUC_ROC 0.776, accuracy 73.6%, sensitivity 71.6%, specificity 75.7%] outperformed other models. The most crucial features in this predictive model were the maximal SBP drop and DBP drop of STS before medication (ΔSBP/ΔDBP). We achieved a prediction accuracy of 72% on independent test data. ΔSBP, ΔDBP, and standing mean artery pressure were the top three variables that contributed most to the predictions across all individual observations in the independent test data. CONCLUSIONS: The validated classifier could serve as a valuable tool for clinicians, offering the probability of a patient developing AOHPL at an early stage. This supports clinical decision-making, potentially enhancing the quality of life for PD patients.

Drug-induced orthostatic hypotension: Cluster analysis of co-prescription patterns in older people in UK primary care.

PURPOSE: Over 250 medications are reported to cause orthostatic hypotension, associated with serious adverse outcomes in older adults. Studies suggest a harmful cumulative risk of orthostatic hypotension with multiple medication use. However, there is limited evidence on the potential for harm in practice, particularly which drugs is co-prescribed and may increase risk of orthostatic hypotension. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study and cluster analysis using general practice data from IQVIA Medical Research Data (IMRD) in patients aged ≥50 contributing data between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2018. Thirteen drug groups known to be associated with orthostatic hypotension by mechanism, were analyzed and clusters generated by sex and age-band. RESULTS: A total of 602 713 individuals aged ≥50 with 283 912 (47%) men and 318 801 (53%) women were included. The most prevalent prescriptions that might contribute to orthostatic hypotension were ACE inhibitors, calcium-channel blockers, beta-blockers, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and uroselective alpha-blockers. We identified distinct clusters of cardiovascular system (cardiovascular system) drugs in men and women at all ages. cardiovascular system plus psychoactive drug clusters were common in women at all ages, and in men aged ≤70. cardiovascular system plus uroselective alpha-blockers were identified in men aged ≥70. CONCLUSIONS: Distinct clusters of drugs associated with orthostatic hypotension exist in practice, which change over the life course. Our findings highlight potentially harmful drug combinations that may cause cumulative risk of orthostatic hypotension in older people. This may guide clinicians about the potential of synergistic harm and to monitor for orthostatic hypotension if using combinations of cardiovascular system drugs, cardiovascular system plus psychoactive drugs and/or alpha-blockers-particularly in patients aged ≥70 or at high-risk due to comorbidity. Future research should consider quantifying the risk of drug-induced orthostatic hypotension with such drug combinations.

Midodrine-Induced Nightmares in the Treatment of Orthostatic Hypotension: A Case Report.

Background Midodrine was the first medication approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of orthostatic hypotension. Pharmacologically, midodrine is a peripheral selective alpha-1-adrenergic agonist that can improve standing, sitting, and supine systolic blood pressure. Common side effects include bradycardia, supine hypertension, and paresthesia. A novel side effect of midodrine-induced nightmares has been reported in our patient. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of midodrine-induced nightmares. Objective To investigate and report a clinically significant and unique drug adverse event of midodrine in the treatment of orthostatic hypotension. Case Presentation This report describes a case of persistent nightmares associated with midodrine use in an 83-year-old male who experienced frequent syncope episodes treated with midodrine for orthostatic hypotension (OH). After the initiation of midodrine, the patient complained of increased nightmares, which quickly led to his refusal of the medication, despite the initial improvements in his blood pressure. The timing of administration included an evening dose at 21:00. This novel adverse event of midodrine-induced nightmares will be highlighted and explored in this case report. Conclusion This case demonstrated a unique adverse event of nightmares caused by midodrine. It is hypothesized that autonomic dysfunction plays a role and further investigations should be conducted to confirm this theory. We hope that our case report highlights the importance of careful consideration when prescribing midodrine in older people with orthostatic hypotension.

Adverse events related to alpha-blockers: analysis of real-life data from Eudra-Vigilance.

BACKGROUND: Patients on alpha-blockers (ABs) treatment may have an increased risk of adverse events (AEs). Aim of our study was to compare real-life data on neuro-vascular and sexual AEs associated with ABs based on Eudra-Vigilance reported AEs. METHODS: Eudra-Vigilance (EV) database is the system for managing and analyzing information on suspected adverse reactions to medicines which have been authorized or being studied in clinical trials in the European Economic Area (EEA). We recorded the number of sexual and neuro-vascular AEs for tamsulosin, alfuzosin, silodosin, prazosin and doxazosin per category and severity until July 30th, 2022. Pooled Relative Risk (PRR) was used to compare data between drugs. RESULTS: Overall the number of AEs were 2842 for Alfuzosin, 11,086 for tamsulosin, 792 for terazosin, 572 for prazosin and 4641 for doxazosin. Different percentages of AEs were obtained for each drug and in different age groups according to EV sub-groups (≤65, 65-85, ≥85). On PRR analysis, the risk of ejaculatory disorders for Silodosin (11%) is 18.5 times higher (PRR 18.5 95%CI; 10.7-31.8; P<0.05) when compared to alfuzosin and the risk of orthostatic hypotension is 2 times lower (PRR=1,84 95%CI 1.32-2.57; P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Real life data is consistent with registry studies regarding side effects related to alpha-blockers. Alfuzosin is safer in terms of ejaculatory disorders while silodosin and tamsulosin in terms of orthostatic hypotension. Clinicians should consider these data when prescribing ABs especially in younger and older patients.

Age as a risk factor for orthostatic hypotension induced by the levodopa challenge test in patients with Parkinson's disease: Results from a single-center trial.

BACKGROUND: Hypotension can occur in patients receiving levodopa (L-dopa) treatment for parkinsonism. However, only few studies have focused on the characteristics of orthostatic hypotension (OH) induced by the L-dopa challenge test (LCT). This study aimed to investigate the characteristics and influencing factors of LCT-induced OH in a relatively large sample of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). METHODS: Seventy-eight patients with PD without a previous diagnosis of OH underwent the LCT. Blood pressure (BP) in the supine and standing positions was measured before and 2 hours after the LCT. If diagnosed with OH, the patients' BP was monitored again 3 hours after the LCT. The clinical features and demographics of the patients were analyzed. RESULTS: Eight patients were diagnosed with OH 2 hours after the LCT (median dose of 375 mg L-dopa/benserazide; incidence = 10.3%). One patient without symptoms had OH 3 hours after the LCT. Compared with patients without OH, patients with OH had lower 1- and 3-minutes standing systolic BP and 1-minute standing diastolic BP at baseline and 2 hours after the LCT. Patients in the OH group were of older age (65.31 ± 4.17 years vs 59.74 ± 5.55years) and had lower Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores (17.5 vs 24) and higher L-dopa/benserazide levels (375 [250, 500] mg vs 250 [125, 500] mg). Older age markedly increased the odds of having LCT-induced OH (odds ratio, 1.451; 95% confidence interval, 1.055-1.995; P = .022). CONCLUSIONS: LCT increased the odds of OH in non-OH PD, causing symptomatic OH in 10.3% of patients in our study, thereby raising safety concerns. Increase in age was observed to be a risk factor for LCT-induced OH in PD patients. A study with a larger sample size is warranted to confirm our results. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinical Trials Registry under ChiCTR2200055707. DATE OF REGISTRATION: January 16, 2022.

Prolactin-Raising and Prolactin-Sparing Antipsychotic Drugs and the Risk of Fracture and Fragility Fracture in Patients With Schizophrenia, Dementia, and Other Disorders.

Patients who require antipsychotic drug treatment are at increased risk of fractures, including osteoporosis-related fragility fractures, for reasons related to demographics, illness-related factors, and treatment-related factors. As examples, patients with dementia may be vulnerable to falls due to cognitive and psychomotor impairment, patients with schizophrenia may be vulnerable to injury related to physical restlessness or physical aggression, and patients receiving antipsychotics may suffer falls related to sedation, psychomotor impairment, bradykinesia, or postural hypotension. Antipsychotics may also increase the risk of fracture through long-term hyperprolactinemia and resultant osteoporosis. A meta-analysis of 36 observational studies conducted in mostly elderly samples found that antipsychotic exposure was associated with an increased risk of hip fracture as well as increased risk of any fracture; the findings were consistent in almost all subgroup analyses. An observational study that controlled for confounding by indication and illness severity found that fragility fractures in patients with schizophrenia were associated with higher daily doses, higher cumulative doses, longer duration of treatment, and prolactin-raising rather than prolactin-sparing antipsychotics; in patients receiving prolactin-raising antipsychotics, the concurrent use of aripiprazole appeared protective. The absolute risks of fracture are unknown and could vary depending on patient age, patient sex, indication for antipsychotic use, nature of the antipsychotic (and associated risk of sedation, psychomotor impairment, bradykinesia, and postural hypotension), daily dose prescribed, duration of antipsychotic exposure, baseline risk of fracture, and other risk factors. Patients should therefore be individually evaluated for risk factors for falls and fractures related to sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment-related risk factors. Patients identified to be at risk should be advised about risk-mitigating strategies. If prolactin-raising antipsychotics are required in the long term, prolactin levels should be monitored and prolactin-lowering strategies should be considered. Osteoporosis should be investigated and managed, if identified, to prevent fragility fractures.

Simple and high sample throughput LC/ESI-MS/MS method for bioequivalence study of prazosin, a drug with risk of orthostatic hypotension.

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to develop a rapid, simple and sensitive LC/ESI-MS/MS method to measure prazosin concentration in human plasma and apply bedside sampling in bioequivalence study of two prazosin tablets to resolve the adverse effect of orthostatic hypotension. SIGNIFICANCE: The LC/ESI-MS/MS prazosin method was highly sensitive and selective. Bedside sampling reduced the orthostatic hypotension incidence and subject dropout rate. METHODS: After sample preparation, prazosin and terazosin (IS) were detected on mass spectrometer operating in multiple reaction monitoring mode using positive ionization. Mobile phase flow rate was set at 0.40 mL/min with sample run time of 1.75 min. The bioanalytical method was validated as per EMEA and FDA guidelines. Bedside sampling was performed in bioequivalence study for the first 4 h after dosing. The three primary pharmacokinetic parameters, Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ and 90% confidence interval were determined. RESULTS: The small injection volume of 1 µL minimized instrumentation contamination and prolonged the analytical column lifespan. Linearity was obtained between 0.5 and 30.0 ng/mL, with coefficient of determination, r2 ≥ 0.99. The mean extraction recovery of prazosin and IS was >92%, with precision value (CV, %) ≤ 10.3%. Only two orthostatic hypotension adverse events were reported. The two prazosin formulations were found to be bioequivalent. CONCLUSION: The LC/ESI-MS/MS method has shown robustness and reliability exemplified by the incurred sample re-analysis result. Bedside sampling should be proposed for bioequivalence or pharmacokinetic studies of drugs demonstrating adverse event of orthostatic hypotension.

Transient alteration of consciousness in spinal cord injury secondary to Baclofen use: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: Oral baclofen is commonly used for spasticity management, especially with neurogenic bladder in spinal cord injury (SCI). A less common side effect of baclofen is transient alterations of consciousness, which can easily be confused for altered mental status secondary to orthostatic hypotension in SCI. CASE PRESENTATION: A 43-year-old man with an acute SCI secondary to an aortic dissection was found to have episodes of confusion after titrating oral baclofen from 5 mg three times per day to 10 mg three times per day at an acute rehabilitation facility. Orthostatic hypotension was initially suspected as the cause of transient alterations of consciousness; however, he was never found to be hypotensive during these episodes. His confusion resolved several days after discontinuation of baclofen. DISCUSSION: Although, confusion and lightheadedness in SCI are commonly caused by orthostatic hypotension, it is important for physicians to be cognizant of baclofen's side effects, which increase in the setting of acute kidney injury (AKI). If an adverse effect is suspected, baclofen should be tapered while remaining observant for signs of baclofen withdrawal, which can be life-threatening. This case report is a reminder for clinicians to be aware of the uncommon adverse effects of baclofen when initiating therapy in SCI, especially in patients with AKI and neurogenic bladders.

Orthostatic Hypotension and Antiparkinsonian Drugs: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Orthostatic hypotension (OH) is multifactorial in Parkinson's disease (PD). Antiparkinsonian medication can contribute to OH, leading to increased risk of falls, weakness and fatigue. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of antiparkinsonian drugs associated with OH as an adverse effect, compared to placebo. We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE and Web of Science databases until November 2020. Analysis used fixed-effects models and the GRADE tool to rate quality of evidence. Meta-analysis was performed if 3 or more studies of a drug group were available. RESULTS: Twenty-one RCTs including 3783 patients were included comparing 6 PD drug groups to placebo (MAO-B inhibitors, dopamine agonists, levodopa, COMT inhibitors, levodopa and adenosine receptor antagonists). OH was recorded as an adverse event or measurement of vital signs, without further specification on how this was defined or operationalised. Meta-analysis was performed for MAO-B inhibitors and dopamine agonists, as there were 3 or more studies for these drug groups. In this analysis, compared with placebo, neither MAO-B inhibitors or dopamine agonists were associated with increased risk of OH, (OR 2.28 [95% CI:0.81-6.46]), (OR 1.39 [95% CI:0.97-1.98]). CONCLUSIONS: Most studies did not specifically report OH, or reporting of OH was limited, including how and when it was measured. Furthermore, studies specifically reporting OH included participants that were younger than typical PD populations without multimorbidity. Future trials should address this, for example,, by including individuals over the age of 75, to improve estimations of how antiparkinsonian medications affect risk of OH.

Drug-induced orthostatic hypotension: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Drug-induced orthostatic hypotension (OH) is common, and its resulting cerebral hypoperfusion is linked to adverse outcomes including falls, strokes, cognitive impairment, and increased mortality. The extent to which specific medications are associated with OH remains unclear. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the extent to which specific drug groups are associated with OH. EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception through 23 November 2020. Placebo-controlled randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on any drug reporting on OH as an adverse effect in adults (≥18 years) were eligible. Three authors extracted data on the drug, OH, dose, participant characteristics, and study setting. The revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials (RoB 2) was used to appraise evidence. Summary odds ratios (ORs) were estimated for OH using fixed effects Mantel-Haenszel statistics. We conducted subgroup analysis on validity of OH measurement, drug dose, risk of bias, age, and comorbidity. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tool was used to summarise the certainty of evidence. Of 36,940 citations, 69 eligible RCTs were included in the meta-analysis comprising 27,079 participants. Compared with placebo, beta-blockers and tricyclic antidepressants were associated with increased odds of OH (OR 7.76 [95% CI 2.51, 24.03]; OR 6.30 [95% CI 2.86, 13.91]). Alpha-blockers, antipsychotics, and SGLT-2 inhibitors were associated with up to 2-fold increased odds of OH, compared to placebo. There was no statistically significant difference in odds of OH with vasodilators (CCBs, ACE inhibitors/ARBs, SSRIs), compared to placebo. Limitations of this study are as follows: data limited to placebo-controlled studies, (excluding head-to-head trials), many RCTs excluded older participants; therefore results may be amplified in older patients in the clinical setting. The study protocol is publicly available on PROSPERO (CRD42020168697). CONCLUSIONS: Medications prescribed for common conditions (including depression, diabetes, and lower urinary tract symptoms) were associated with significantly increased odds of OH. Drugs causing sympathetic inhibition were associated with significantly increased odds of OH, while most vasodilators were associated with small nonsignificant differences in odds of OH, compared to placebo. Drugs targeting multiple parts of the orthostatic blood pressure (BP) reflex pathway (e.g. sympathetic inhibition, vasodilation, cardio-inhibitory effects) may carry cumulative risk, suggesting that individuals with polypharmacy could benefit from postural BP monitoring.

Evaluation of Patients with Syncope in the Emergency Department: How to Adjust Pharmacological Therapy.

The rate of syncope in the Emergency Department ranges between 0.9 and 1.7%. Syncope is mostly related to a underlying reflex or orthostatic mechanism. A bradycardic or a hypotensive phenotype, may be identified. The latter is the most common and could be constitutional or drug induced. Consequently, obtaining an accurate drug history is an important step of the initial assessment of syncope. As anti-hypertensive medication might be responsible for orthostatic hypotension, managing hypertension in patients with syncope requires finding an ideal balance between hypotensive and cardiovascular risks. The choice of anti-hypertensive molecule as well as the therapeutic regimen and dosage, influences the risk of syncope. Not only could anti-hypertensive drugs have a hypotensive effect but opioids and psychoactive medications may also be involved in the mechanism of syncope. Proper drug management could reduce syncope recurrences and their consequences.

Risks associated with continuation of potentially inappropriate antihypertensive medications in older adults receiving hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: After dialysis initiation, older adults may experience orthostatic or post-dialysis hypotension. Some orthostasis-causing antihypertensives (i.e., central alpha agonists and alpha blockers), are considered potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) for older adults because they carry more risk than benefit. We sought to (1) describe antihypertensive PIM prescribing patterns before and after dialysis initiation and (2) ascertain the potential risk of adverse outcomes when these medications are continued after dialysis initiation. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, AND MEASUREMENTS: Using United States Renal Data System data, we evaluated monthly prevalence of antihypertensive PIM claims in the period before and after dialysis initiation among older adults aged ≥66 years initiating in-center hemodialysis in the US between 2013 and 2014. Patients with an antihypertensive PIM prescription at hemodialysis initiation and who survived for 120 days were classified as 'continuers' or 'discontinuers' based on presence or absence of a refill within the 120 days after initiation. We compared rates of hospitalization and risk of death across these groups from day 121 through 24 months after dialysis initiation. RESULTS: Our study included 30,760 total patients, of whom 5981 (19%) patients had an antihypertensive PIM claim at dialysis initiation and survived ≥120 days. Most [65% (n = 3920)] were continuers. Those who continued (versus discontinued) were more likely to be black race (26% versus 21%), have dual Medicare-Medicaid coverage (31% versus 27%), have more medications on average (12 versus 9) and have no functional limitations (84% versus 80%). Continuers experienced fewer all-cause hospitalizations and deaths, but neither were statistically significant after adjustment (Hospitalization: RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.86, 1.00; Death: HR 0.89, 95% CI: 0.78-1.02). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly one in five older adults had an antihypertensive PIM at dialysis initiation. Among those who survived ≥120 days, continuation of an antihypertensive PIM was not associated with increased risk of all-cause hospitalization or mortality.

Vasorelaxant effects of benzodiazepines, non-benzodiazepine sedative-hypnotics, and tandospirone on isolated rat arteries.

Benzodiazepines (BDZs) and non-BDZ sedative-hypnotics are effective for the management of chronic insomnia; however, they are associated with adverse effects such as headache, dizziness, and palpitations. Furthermore, long-term use of these medications is associated with decreased blood pressure (BP) or depressed baroreflex function. Therefore, here, we assessed whether BDZs and non-BDZs cause vasorelaxation directly. Vasorelaxation in response to 22 BDZs, 2 non-BDZs, and tandospirone was determined by myograph methods using isolated Wistar rat thoracic aortas. All the drugs relaxed phenylephrine-contracted rat aortas in a concentration-dependent manner. Zolpidem and tandospirone caused over 80% relaxation at a concentration of 10 µM; diazepam, estazolam, etizolam, and tofisopam caused 60-70% relaxation; whereas 18 other BDZs (alprazolam, bromazepam, brotizolam, chlordiazepoxide, clobazam, clonazepam, clorazepate, ethyl loflazepate, flunitrazepam, flurazepam, lorazepam, lormetazepam, midazolam, nimetazepam, nitrazepam, oxazepam, temazepam, and triazolam) and zaleplon caused less than 50% relaxation. The relaxation was partially but significantly inhibited to the same extent by a nitric oxide (NO) synthase antagonist and after endothelium removal. Binding assay of gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptors was performed using [3H]flunitrazepam. No correlation was observed between vasorelaxation at a concentration of 10 µM and the binding affinities for 23 drugs. The study demonstrated that zaleplon, zolpidem, tandospirone, and many BDZs cause vasorelaxation to different extents via endothelial NO-dependent and endothelium-independent pathways. In conclusion, the direct vasodilatory effects of these drugs may be involved in the mechanisms underlying their adverse effects. Additionally, the decreased BP observed in persons who take BDZs or non-BDZs may be partly due to direct vasodilation.

Orthostatic hypotension in older adults: the role of medications.

Orthostatic hypotension (OH) is defined as an abnormal blood pressure reduction when standing and is frequently diagnosed in older adults. Pharmacological therapy is one of the main causes of orthostatic blood pressure impairment, leading to iatrogenic OH. Indeed, several medications may induce hypotensive effects and influence the blood pressure response to orthostatism. Hypotensive medications may also overlap with other determinants of OH, thus increasing the burden of symptoms and the risk of complications. Potentially hypotensive medications include both cardiovascular and psychoactive drugs, which are frequently prescribed in older patients. According to the available evidence, the antihypertensive treatment "per se" does not seem to predispose to OH, even if a higher risk is associated with polypharmacy and drug classes such as with diuretics and vasodilators. As concerns psychoactive medications, OH is a well-known adverse effect of tricyclic antidepressants, trazodone and antipsychotics. The knowledge of hemodynamic consequences of drug therapy may be helpful to improve OH treatment. A medication review is advisable in all patients presenting with OH, particularly at advanced age, aiming at optimizing medical treatment with a view to minimize the risk of iatrogenic OH.

Drug-Related Orthostatic Hypotension: Beyond Anti-Hypertensive Medications.

Orthostatic hypotension (OH) is an abnormal blood pressure response to standing, which is associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes such as syncope, falls, cognitive impairment, and mortality. Medical therapy is one the most common causes of OH, since numerous cardiovascular and psychoactive medications may interfere with the blood pressure response to standing, leading to drug-related OH. Additionally, hypotensive medications frequently overlap with other OH risk factors (e.g., advanced age, neurogenic autonomic dysfunction, and comorbidities), thus increasing the risk of symptoms and complications. Consequently, a medication review is recommended as a first-line approach in the diagnostic and therapeutic work-up of OH, with a view to minimizing the risk of drug-related orthostatic blood pressure impairment. If symptoms persist after the review of hypotensive medications, despite adherence to non-pharmacological interventions, specific drug treatment for OH can be considered. In this narrative review we present an overview of drugs acting on the cardiovascular and central nervous system that may potentially impair the orthostatic blood pressure response and we provide practical suggestions that may be helpful to guide medical therapy optimization in patients with OH. In addition, we summarize the available strategies for drug treatment of OH in patients with persistent symptoms despite non-pharmacological interventions.

Risk of orthostatic hypotension associated with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor treatment: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the association between sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and the risk of orthostatic hypotension (OH) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHOD: A systematic literature retrieval was performed using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) from inception up to 16 October 2019. Data for study characteristics and outcomes of interest were extracted from each eligible study. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for OH were calculated using a random-effects model. RESULT: A total of 16 studies (n = 12,749) were included in our meta-analysis, with a result of 44 incident OH cases (29 in the SGLT2 inhibitor group, and 15 in the control group). The pooled RR was 1.17 (95% CI: 0.65-2.09). There was no evidence that receiving SGLT2 inhibitors increased the risk of OH, when stratified by age, duration of T2DM, or placebo-control or active-control and baseline blood pressure. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggested that, in general, SGLPT2 inhibitors did not increase the risk of OH in patients with T2DM. The possibility of OH should be, therefore, considered on an individual basis, especially in patients with a history of OH, long duration of T2DM, or comorbidities.