ABSTRACT
This study focused on the psychological, social, and cultural dimensions of infertility among women with infertility in Harare Urban who have utilised traditional healthcare systems to address their infertility problem. It also emphasises their coping strategies for dealing with the challenges encountered along the infertile journey. This was a qualitative study using a phenomenological approach, focusing on the experiences of five women. Data from the interviews was analysed using a simplified version of Hycner's (1985) five-step explication process. The study produced three main themes: psychological experiences, socio-cultural experiences, and coping experiences, along with seven sub-themes. The results showed that women experienced intense distress, sorrow, and self-blame because of their inability to have children, further compounded by the stigma they faced from their families and communities. Women with infertility are subjected to derogatory labels, social contempt, ridicule, and being undervalued, which leads them to develop coping strategies to endure the adverse encounters. These coping mechanisms can have either positive or negative effects on their overall welfare. The exploration of psychological, socio-cultural factors, and coping mechanisms of women with infertility problems' presents a chance to co-create interventions that empower them.
Cette étude s'est concentrée sur les dimensions psychologiques, sociales et culturelles de l'infertilité chez les femmes infertiles de Harare Urban qui ont utilisé les systèmes de santé traditionnels pour résoudre leur problème d'infertilité. Il met également l'accent sur leurs stratégies d'adaptation pour faire face aux défis rencontrés tout au long du parcours stérile. Il s'agissait d'une étude qualitative utilisant une approche phénoménologique, axée sur les expériences de cinq femmes. Les données des entretiens ont été analysées à l'aide d'une version simplifiée du processus d'explication en cinq étapes de Hycner (1985). L'étude a produit trois thèmes principaux : les expériences psychologiques, les expériences socioculturelles et les expériences d'adaptation, ainsi que sept sous-thèmes. Les résultats ont montré que les femmes éprouvaient une détresse, un chagrin et une culpabilité intenses en raison de leur incapacité à avoir des enfants, encore aggravés par la stigmatisation à laquelle elles étaient confrontées de la part de leur famille et de leur communauté. Les femmes infertiles sont soumises à des étiquettes désobligeantes, au mépris social, au ridicule et à la sous-évaluation, ce qui les amène à développer des stratégies d'adaptation pour supporter les rencontres défavorables. Ces mécanismes d'adaptation peuvent avoir des effets positifs ou négatifs sur leur bien-être global. L'exploration des facteurs psychologiques, socioculturels et des mécanismes d'adaptation des femmes souffrant de problèmes d'infertilité présente une opportunité de co-créer des interventions qui les autonomisent.
Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological , Infertility, Female , Qualitative Research , Social Stigma , Humans , Female , Adult , Zimbabwe , Infertility, Female/psychology , Infertility, Female/therapy , Urban Population , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Infertility/psychology , Infertility/therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Son preference is known to be prevalent in developing countries and has dire consequences for the family, particularly girls and women. It is speculated that the prevalence of son preference may be high among fertility clinic attendees, and that son preference may be the reason for seeking fertility care in Nigeria. OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence and risk factors for son preference among fertility seekers in Enugu, Nigeria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Questionnaire-based cross-sectional study of fertility clinic attendees from the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital Ituku-Ozalla Enugu and the Pink Petals Fertility Clinic Enugu from April 1 to September 30, 2023. Eligible and consenting participants were interviewed. Data collection was with a pretested interviewer-administered questionnaire, which contained three sections: biodata, obstetrics and gynecological data and 3-point son preference questions. The proportion of those who scored 3 (son preference) was documented. The analysis was both descriptive and inferential using IBM SPSS statistics for Windows, version 22.0 Armonk, NY, USA: IBM Corp. RESULTS: Of the 422 participants interviewed, 416 (98.6%) completed the study with a nonresponse rate of 6 (1.4%). The overall prevalence of son preference was 10.1% (42/416) and all 42 (10.1%) were in the clinic to have a male baby. The risk factors for son preference were less than tertiary education (P < 0.001, adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 6.46, confidence interval [CI] 2.79-14.98) and family pressure to have a male baby (P = 0.03, AOR = 3.41, CI 1.72-7.13). CONCLUSIONS: One in 10 couples who attend an infertility clinic in Enugu, Nigeria, has a preference for son, and having a male child is the sole purpose of such a visit. Being under family pressure and not having tertiary education were the predictive risk factors for son preference in the study population.
Résumé Contexte:La préférence pour les garçons est connue pour être répandue dans les pays en développement et a des conséquences désastreuses sur la famille, en particulier sur les filles. et les femmes. On suppose que la prévalence de la préférence pour les garçons pourrait être élevée parmi les prestataires des cliniques de fertilité, et que la préférence pour les garçons pourrait être élevée. être la raison pour laquelle vous recherchez des soins de fertilité au Nigeria.Objectifs:Déterminer la prévalence et les facteurs de risque de préférence pour les garçons parmi les facteurs de fécondité. chercheurs à Enugu, au Nigeria.Matériels et méthodes:Étude transversale basée sur un questionnaire auprès de participantes aux cliniques de fertilité de l'Université de l'hôpital universitaire du Nigeria Ituku Ozalla Enugu et de la clinique de fertilité Pink Petals Enugu du 1er avril au 30 septembre 2023. Éligible et les participants consentants ont été interrogés. La collecte des données s'est faite à l'aide d'un questionnaire pré-testé administré par l'intervieweur, qui contenait trois sections: données biologiques, données obstétricales et gynécologiques et questions de préférence pour les fils en 3 points. La proportion de ceux qui ont obtenu un score de 3 (fils préférence) a été documentée. L'analyse était à la fois descriptive et inférentielle à l'aide des statistiques IBM SPSS pour Windows, version 22.0 Armonk, NY, États-Unis: IBM Corp.Résultats:Sur les 422 participants interrogés, 416 (98.6 %) ont terminé l'étude avec un taux de non-réponse de 6 (1.4 %). La prévalence globale de la préférence pour les garçons était de 10.1 % (42/416) et les 42 (10.1 %) étaient toutes à la clinique pour avoir un bébé de sexe masculin. Les facteurs de risque pour la préférence pour les garçons étaient inférieures à l'enseignement supérieur ( P < 0.001, rapport de cotes ajusté [AOR] = 6.46, intervalle de confiance [CI] 2.7914.98) et pression familiale pour avoir un bébé de sexe masculin ( P = 0.03, AOR = 3.41, CI 1.727.13).Conclusions:un couple sur 10 qui fréquente une clinique d'infertilité à Enugu, au Nigeria, a une préférence pour les fils, et avoir un enfant de sexe masculin est le seul objectif d'une telle visite. Être sous la pression familiale et non avoir fait des études supérieures était le facteur de risque prédictif de la préférence pour les garçons dans la population étudiée.
Subject(s)
Fertility Clinics , Infertility , Humans , Male , Nigeria/epidemiology , Female , Cross-Sectional Studies , Adult , Surveys and Questionnaires , Infertility/psychology , Infertility/epidemiology , Tertiary Care Centers , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Young Adult , Family Characteristics , Middle Aged , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Over the past decade, nationally representative research elucidating the association between depression and infertility has been notably lacking. Our study aimed to investigate the association between depression and infertility among women of childbearing age. METHODS: Our study encompassed 3,654 women aged 18 to 45 years from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2013-2018. Infertility was defined as a positive response to the query: "Have you attempted to conceive for a minimum of one year without achieving pregnancy?" Depression was evaluated by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) score (range, 0-27). Multiple logistic regression analyses and subgroup analyses stratified by age and race/ethnicity were conducted to investigate the association between depression and infertility. Furthermore, fitted smoothing curves and threshold effect analysis were utilized to depict the nonlinear relationship. RESULTS: Total PHQ-9 score was associated with infertility in the fully adjusted model (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.07, P = 0.010), and this relationship exhibited a non-linear pattern, reaching a saturation point at 13, as substantiated by the fitting of smoothed curves. Additionally, the association remained robust when stratified by age but not by race/ethnicity. LIMITATIONS: Cross-sectional design and recall biases. CONCLUSIONS: In this cross-sectional study, depression was associated with infertility among women of childbearing age in the fully adjusted models. This observed association holds potential relevance for clinicians tasked with enhancing psychological well-being during infertility management strategies.
Subject(s)
Depression , Nutrition Surveys , Humans , Female , Adult , Depression/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Adolescent , Young Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Infertility/psychology , Infertility/epidemiology , Patient Health Questionnaire , Infertility, Female/psychology , Infertility, Female/epidemiology , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To educate the public on how best to support people with fertility problems, a narrative short film "Ten Things Not to Say to Someone Struggling with Infertility" was created, depicting the impact that helpful versus unhelpful dialogue has on someone with fertility problems. METHODS: Before and after watching the video, 419 participants from the public were presented with a hypothetical vignette describing a woman experiencing fertility problems and asked about the likelihood that they would endorse a series of helpful and unhelpful statements when communicating with the protagonist. Pre and post endorsement of helpful versus unhelpful statements were compared, as were self-perceived knowledge about the mental health aspects of fertility problems, confidence in providing emotional support to someone with fertility problems, and empathy for the protagonist. RESULTS: Participants endorsed fewer unhelpful statements after the video relative to before (M(SD) = 2.2(2.3) vs. 1.3(2.3), p < .001) and fewer participants endorsed at least one unhelpful statement (72% to 47%, p < .001). Self-perceived knowledge of fertility problems, confidence in providing support, and empathy increased at post-test (ps < .001; Cohen's d = .56-.83) indicating medium-large effects. CONCLUSIONS: A narrative short film appears to be an effective dissemination strategy for sensitizing the public to the emotional struggles of individuals experiencing fertility problems.
Subject(s)
Motion Pictures , Social Support , Humans , Female , Adult , Infertility/psychology , Male , Middle Aged , Narration , Empathy , Young Adult , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Emotions , Health Education/methods , AdolescentABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The aim of this systematic review was to reveal which of the coping strategies used by one partner are protective of and which pose a risk to the other partner's psychological adjustment during the treatment of infertility. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic search of four electronic databases (PubMed, APA PsycINFO, SCOPUS, ScienceDirect), as well as the references of the retrieved articles, was performed between May and September 2023 for studies published from 1990 until 2023, using appropriate MeSH terms and associated text words. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Using an a priori developed pilot data extraction form, authors performed an independent extraction of articles. Information on participants, coping mechanisms, and psychological adjustment was extracted from each study. Relevant articles were critically appraised, and a narrative synthesis was conducted based on the different designs and outcome measures among the included studies. RESULTS: A total of 194 articles were retrieved, and 187 were excluded for not meeting the inclusion criteria. After duplicates had been removed, five studies were included in the review. The results revealed that the psychological adaptation of infertile couples at an interpersonal level may be correlated with both the type of coping and the stage of the stressor (infertility treatment or in vitro fertilisation - IVF). CONCLUSION: This systematic review suggests that health professionals could design and apply interventions based on modifying the coping mechanisms of infertile spouses to increase levels of well-being and decrease levels of distress.
Subject(s)
Coping Skills , Emotional Adjustment , Infertility , Humans , Infertility/psychology , Infertility/therapy , Spouses/psychology , Stress, Psychological/psychologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: While assisted reproductive technologies (ART) have helped many people experiencing infertility become pregnant, the ART process can take a psychological toll. This study examined whether and how perceived stress- and depression-related symptoms vary among individuals at different stages of the infertility and ART process, and whether ART-specific stressors and emotional support are associated with mental health symptomatology. METHODS: Data were collected using an online REDCap survey administered between July 2021 and March 2022. The survey was administered to 240 participants who had experienced infertility, including those who had not yet accessed ART, those undergoing ART but who were not yet pregnant, those currently pregnant through ART, and those who had given birth in the last year through ART. Each participant completed the Cohen Perceived Stress Scale (range 0-40) and the Edinburgh Depression Scale (range 0-30). Participants who had undergone ART were asked about their experience of ART-specific stressors and how helpful partner and provider support had been during the ART process. Survey data were analyzed using ANOVA and multivariate linear regressions. RESULTS: 88% of participants reported medium or high levels of perceived stress, and 43.8% of respondents showed probable indications of depression. Perceived stress and depression symptoms were significantly higher for individuals currently undergoing, but not yet pregnant from, ART treatments. These effect sizes were substantial; for example, depression scores in this group were five points higher than among currently pregnant individuals and nine points higher than among postpartum individuals. For the subset of participants who had used or were currently undergoing ART (N = 221), perceived social stigma and the physical and time demands of ART were significantly associated with higher stress and depression symptoms, while partner emotional support was associated with lower perceived stress. CONCLUSIONS: The ART process exacerbates perceived stress and depression symptoms among individuals experiencing infertility. Given the potential long-term impacts on both parent and child wellbeing, clinicians and policymaking groups, including the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM), should consider making access to mental health services a standard of care during infertility treatment.
Subject(s)
Depression , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Social Support , Stress, Psychological , Humans , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/psychology , Female , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Adult , Depression/psychology , Pregnancy , Surveys and Questionnaires , Male , Infertility/psychology , Middle Aged , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Globally, infertility is known as a major problem which can ruin a couple's relationship. In recent years, many studies have addressed the causes of infertility, the outcomes of treatments for infertility, and the effects of infertility on couples' mental health; however, the concept of dignity of women living with infertility has never been examined in depth. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the dignity of women living with infertility in Iran. DESIGN: This qualitative research was conducted via conventional content analysis approach. METHODS: This qualitative study was conducted in Iran from February to December 2022. In this research, the data were collected through face-to-face semi-structured in-depth interviews with 23 women living with infertility selected via purposive sampling. The interviews were continued until reaching the data saturation point. Data analysis was performed simultaneously with data collection. The interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed through Graneheim and Lundman style content analysis, with data management done using the MAXQDA software. To achieve the accuracy and validity of the study, the four-dimension criteria by Lincoln and Guba, namely credibility, dependability, conformability, and transformability, were considered and used. RESULTS: Analysis of the qualitative data yielded three themes and eight subthemes. The three main themes were (1) overcoming identity crises (overcoming dysthymia, coping with unaccomplished motherhood), (2) respect for personal identity (respect for confidentiality; respect for beliefs, values, and attitudes; avoidance of stigma and pity), and (3) compassion-focused therapy (sympathizing, mental and spiritual support, and enhancement of life skills). CONCLUSION: Dignity of women living with infertility encompasses overcoming identity crises, respect for personal identity, and compassion therapy. The policymakers and administrators in the healthcare system can use the findings of this study to create a proper clinical environment toward preserving the dignity of women living with infertility.
Subject(s)
Infertility, Female , Qualitative Research , Humans , Female , Iran , Adult , Infertility, Female/psychology , Infertility, Female/therapy , Respect , Personhood , Interviews as Topic , Infertility/psychology , Infertility/therapy , PerceptionSubject(s)
Mood Disorders , Humans , Female , Mood Disorders/therapy , Mood Disorders/diagnosis , Male , Infertility/therapy , Infertility/psychologyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To investigate the abortion views and reproductive concerns of current in vitro fertilization patients after the US Supreme Court Dobbs v. Jackson decision, which overturned the Roe v. Wade decision guaranteeing abortion access. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional survey of English-speaking patients undergoing in vitro fertilization from January to November 2022 at a large academic institution in a state with restricted abortion care. Participants completed a 43-question electronic survey which measured feelings about abortion, future fertility treatments, and embryo disposition both quantitatively and qualitatively. RESULTS: Of 543 eligible patients, 267 (49%) consented to participate when called and were sent the survey. Of those, 180 (67%) completed it, resulting in a total completion rate of 33%. The majority believe abortion should be legal in the case of birth defects (90.8%) or rape or incest (90.3%). A significant proportion (91.4%) expressed concerns about abortion being illegal in the state that they receive infertility care. They reported some concern about making embryos (89.6%), controlling what happens to them (95.4%), and discarding them (94.4%). Patients wrote about their concerns with pursuing fertility treatments, fear of not having access to needed medical care, and the desire to remain close to states with less restrictive abortion laws. CONCLUSIONS: The evolving political landscape surrounding access to reproductive care has created significant concerns regarding legal regulation of these treatments and the disposition of embryos. By understanding patients' concerns, health care providers can more effectively advocate for the protection of fertility treatments and patients' autonomy in embryo disposition.
Subject(s)
Abortion, Induced , Fertilization in Vitro , Humans , Female , Adult , Fertilization in Vitro/psychology , Fertilization in Vitro/legislation & jurisprudence , Pregnancy , Abortion, Induced/legislation & jurisprudence , Abortion, Induced/psychology , United States , Cross-Sectional Studies , Embryo Disposition/psychology , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/psychology , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/legislation & jurisprudence , Surveys and Questionnaires , Infertility/therapy , Infertility/psychology , MaleABSTRACT
STUDY QUESTION: Does the Mind/Body Program for Infertility (MBPI) perform better, due to certain distinctive elements, than a partly matched support group in improving the wellbeing and medically assisted reproduction (MAR) outcomes of women with elevated distress levels in a clinical setting? SUMMARY ANSWER: While robust enhancements occurred in the wellbeing overall, the cognitive behavioural and formalized stress management elements of the MBPI allowed a significantly stronger improvement in trait anxiety, but not in other mental health and MAR outcomes, compared with a support group. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Mind-body psychological programmes adjacent to MAR have been found to improve women's mental states and possibly increase chances of pregnancy. However, not enough is known about the programme's effectiveness among patients with elevated distress levels in routine clinical settings, nor is it clear which of its particular ingredients are specifically effective. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A pre-post design, single-centre, randomized controlled trial was performed between December 2019 and October 2022 (start and end of recruitment, respectively). The sample size (n = 168) was calculated to detect superiority of the MBPI in improving fertility-related quality of life. Randomization was computer-based, with random numbers concealing identities of patients until after allocation. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The trial was conducted at a large university teaching hospital. A total of 168 patients were randomly assigned to the mind-body (MBPI) group (n = 84) and the fertility support (FS) control group (n = 84). Patients received a 10-week, 135-min/week group intervention, with the FS group following the same format as the MBPI group, but with a less restricted and systematic content, and without the presumed effective factors. The number of patients analysed was n = 74 (MBPI) and n = 68 (FS) for post-intervention psychological outcomes, and n = 54 (MBPI) and n = 56 (FS) for pregnancy outcomes at a 30-month follow-up. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Significant improvements occurred in both groups in all psychological domains (adjusted P < 0.001), except for treatment-related quality of life. Linear mixed-model regression analysis did not reveal significantly greater pre-post improvements in the MBPI group than in the FS group in fertility-related quality of life (difference in differences (DD) = 4.11 [0.42, 7.80], d = 0.32, adjusted P = 0.124), treatment-related quality of life (DD = -3.08 [-7.72, 1.55], d = -0.20, adjusted P = 0.582), infertility-specific stress (DD = -2.54 [-4.68, 0.41], d = -0.36, adjusted P = 0.105), depression (DD = -1.16 [3.61, 1.29], d = -0.13, adjusted P = 0.708), and general stress (DD = -0.62 [-1.91, 0.68], d = -0.13, adjusted P = 0.708), but it did show a significantly larger improvement in trait anxiety (DD = -3.60 [-6.16, -1.04], d = -0.32, adjusted P = 0.042). Logistic regression showed no group effect on MAR pregnancies, spontaneous pregnancies, or live births. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The follow-up only covered MAR-related medical outcomes and no psychological variables, and their rates were not equal in the two groups. Biological factors other than age, aetiology, and duration of infertility may have confounded the study results. Loss to follow-up was between 5% and 10%, which may have led to some bias. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The psychologically and medically heterogeneous sample, the normal clinical setting and the low attrition rate all raise the external validity and generalizability of our study. The MBPI works not only in controlled conditions, but also in routine MAR practice, where it can be introduced as a cost-effective, low-intensity psychological intervention, within the framework of stepped care. More studies are needed to further identify its active ingredients. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04151485. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 5 November 2019. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT'S ENROLMENT: 15 December 2019.
Subject(s)
Infertility, Female , Quality of Life , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Humans , Female , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/psychology , Adult , Pregnancy , Infertility, Female/therapy , Infertility, Female/psychology , Mind-Body Therapies/methods , Anxiety/therapy , Anxiety/psychology , Mental Health , Treatment Outcome , Infertility/therapy , Infertility/psychology , Pregnancy Rate , Stress, Psychological/therapy , Stress, Psychological/psychologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: While there exists an ample body of research in international contexts focused on the characterization and quantification of infertility psychological distress, the level of scholarly scrutiny directed towards this phenomenon within the context of China remains scant. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To investigate the formation and developmental processes of psychological distress associated with infertility and infertility treatment among women within the Chinese cultural context and to construct a theoretical framework that elucidates this phenomenon. DESIGN: Qualitative approach with grounded theory methodology. METHODS: This study was conducted within the reproductive medicine department of a tertiary-level hospital located in central China from May to August 2023. Twenty-seven women who experienced infertility and underwent assisted reproductive treatment (ART) were interviewed. The interview sessions spanned durations ranging from 20 min to 1 h and 35 min. Data analysis included open coding, axial coding and selective coding. The study is reported using the COREQ checklist. RESULTS: The infertility psychological distress experienced by women undergoing ART is a socially constructed phenomenon influenced by a dynamic interplay of forces that construct and conciliate it. The formation and progression of infertility psychological distress are rooted in the process of self-construction. A Middle-Ranged Theory titled 'self-reconstruction under the dome of infertility and infertility treatment' (SUDIT theory) was developed to explain this phenomenon. Within this framework, infertility psychological distress manifests across three distinct phases under the gambling of the constructive force and conciliative force: (1) distress of disrupting the former self; (2) distress linked to the struggling present self; and (3) the renewed-self harmonized with distress. CONCLUSIONS: It is imperative for healthcare professionals and policymakers to acknowledge the socially constructed nature of infertility psychological distress, and proactively implement measures aimed at ameliorating it. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.
Subject(s)
Grounded Theory , Infertility, Female , Psychological Distress , Qualitative Research , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Humans , Female , Adult , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/psychology , China , Infertility, Female/psychology , Infertility, Female/therapy , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Infertility/psychologyABSTRACT
Evaluating couples' coping with infertility and its impact on their mental health is valuable in designing supportive programs. Since infertility is a shared problem in married life, coping with it requires collaborative coping strategies. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to design and psychometrically evaluate the collaborative coping with infertility questionnaire (CCIQ) in candidates of assisted reproductive techniques (ART). The exploratory factor analysis of a 27-item questionnaire designed based on the Likert scale in the Persian language was evaluated through the principal component analysis method in a cross-sectional study conducted on 200 couples who volunteered for ART. The cut-off point of factor loadings was considered 0.4. Furthermore, the criterion validity of the questionnaire was evaluated using a 12-item revised Fertility Adjustment Scale (R-FAS) and its relationship with the score of the CCIQ. Moreover, the internal consistency of the questionnaire was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha correlation coefficient. In the exploratory factor analysis, 20 items with a factor loading above 0.4 were extracted under three factors. The three extracted factors with a value above one explained 43.78% of the variance of CCIQ. The factor loading of the accepted items ranged between 0.402 and 0.691. External reliability was confirmed with Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.98. The relationship between CCIQ and R-FAS score was significant (p < 0.0001). The results of the study showed that the 20-item CCIQ enjoyed acceptable validity and reliability in the three dimensions of 'dynamic interaction,' 'reorganizing married life goals,' and 'perception about infertility,' which can be used to evaluate collaborative coping with infertility questionnaire in ART candidates.
Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological , Infertility , Psychometrics , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Humans , Surveys and Questionnaires , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/psychology , Psychometrics/methods , Male , Infertility/psychology , Female , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Factor Analysis, StatisticalABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIM: The relationship between psychological factors and treatment outcomes with assisted reproductive technology has sparked considerable debate. This study aims to investigate the emotional risk factors in couples seeking infertility treatment using assisted reproductive technology in Sari, Iran, from 2020 to 2022. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This research is a cross-sectional study and emotional risk factors and other related factors were examined using the Persian version of the SCREENIVF demographic, social, and clinical status questionnaire, social, and clinical status questionnaire before using Assisted reproductive technology in 460 infertile couples selected from infertility treatment centers in Sari City, Iran. The samples were randomly selected using a table of random numbers. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 22 software. RESULTS: The mean age of the male and female participants were 31.70 ± 5.71 and 35.22 ± 5.48, respectively. The results regarding emotional risk factors and other related factors revealed that the variables of remarriage (P = 0.048) and exposure of spouse to emotional risk factors (P = 0.001), history of depression disorder (P = 0.007), and history of anxiety disorder (P = 0.009) were significantly correlated with the exposure of women to emotional risk factors. Furthermore, men's exposure to emotional risk factors was significantly correlated with primary education (P = 0.026) and diploma (P = 0.043) levels, age (P = 0.006), and wife's exposure to emotional risk factors (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: By identifying infertile couples who are at risk of emotional risk factors, healthcare professionals can provide appropriate support and interventions to mitigate the emotional challenges associated with infertility. This proactive approach can significantly enhance couples undergoing infertility treatment's well-being and mental health.
Subject(s)
Fertilization in Vitro , Infertility , Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Iran , Cross-Sectional Studies , Risk Factors , Fertilization in Vitro/psychology , Infertility/psychology , Emotions , Depression/psychology , Depression/epidemiology , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Spouses/psychologyABSTRACT
This study examined attachment insecurities, infertility-specific coping strategies, and quality of life (QoL) in 87 couples seeking fertility treatment. Partners completed self-report measures. Path analyses showed that women's and men's attachment anxiety were associated with their own lower QoL, whereas attachment avoidance was associated with their own and their partner's lower QoL. Adaptive coping in men and women were associated with women's higher QoL. Non-adaptive coping was associated with men and women's lower QoL. Coping strategies explained the associations between attachment and QoL. This highlights the importance of individual and dyadic factors for understanding QoL in couples seeking fertility treatment.
Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological , Infertility , Object Attachment , Quality of Life , Humans , Female , Quality of Life/psychology , Male , Adult , Infertility/psychology , Spouses/psychology , Interpersonal Relations , Sexual Partners/psychologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUD: To investigate the factors influencing fertility quality of life in infertile men, constructing a structural equation model of the factors influencing fertility quality of life in infertile men, and to provide suggested measures for improving fertility quality of life in infertile men. METHODS: It is a Observational study. Infertile men (n = 250) attending a fertility centre in a hospital in Xinjiang, matched 1:2 men with no obvious male factor in the control group (n = 500).The Quality of Fertility Life Scale, the Social Support Scale, the Fertility Stress Scale and the Positive Attention Awareness Scale were used to conduct the survey. The model was constructed by applying the maximum likelihood estimation method in Mplus 8.3 software, to explore the factors influencing the quality of reproductive life of infertile men through path analyses. Differences between the case and control groups were statistically significant (P < 0.05) in terms of total fertility quality of life scores, core entry dimensions, affective responses, physical and mental relationships, selective treatment dimensions, and treatment tolerance. RESULTS: Past medical history, history of exposure to hazardous environments, health insurance reimbursement, social support, fertility stress, and mindfulness are important factors affecting the quality of fertility life of infertile men. CONCLUSION: The quality of fertility life of infertile men is not optimistic. By improving the level of mindfulness, fertility stress, and social support, we propose appropriate measures to improve the quality of fertility life of infertile men. These measures can improve their confidence in clinical diagnosis and infertility treatment, enabling them to cope positively with these challenges.
Subject(s)
Infertility , Quality of Life , Humans , Male , Quality of Life/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Fertility , Infertility/psychology , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Primary healthcare providers have an important role in helping people manage their reproductive health and fertility by assessing pregnancy intentions to inform the provision of contraception and/or preconception care. This study explores how women navigating fertility decisions perceived and experienced interactions with their healthcare providers around their fertility. METHODS: We conducted in-depth interviews (N = 17) and focus groups (N = 17 groups) with 65 women aged 18 to 35 years about fertility, infertility, and reproductive planning. Two researchers coded 2 transcripts using thematic and inductive methods and met to develop a structured codebook. We then applied the codebook to the remaining transcripts. RESULTS: In all interviews and focus groups, participants discussed their interactions with healthcare providers around fertility. Three central themes emerged in the data, including a desire for more information from healthcare providers about fertility; experiences of having fertility concerns dismissed by healthcare providers (eg, ability to become pregnant when desired); and, feelings that healthcare providers lacked sensitivity in discussing fertility related issues. Notably, these themes were present, even among participants who were not trying to become pregnant or who did not wish to become pregnant. CONCLUSION: Participants wanted information about fertility from their primary healthcare providers that they felt was lacking. Moreover, participants wanted their healthcare providers to engage with them as multifaceted individuals with current needs as well as future plans regarding fertility. While healthcare providers regularly assess pregnancy intentions, they may need to make a concerted effort to address fertility concerns among both those who want to pursue pregnancy and those who do not wish to become pregnant immediately.
Subject(s)
Focus Groups , Health Personnel , Humans , Female , Adult , Young Adult , Adolescent , Health Personnel/psychology , Fertility , Pregnancy , Interviews as Topic , Decision Making , Infertility/psychology , Infertility/therapy , Family Planning Services , Reproductive Health , Qualitative ResearchABSTRACT
PURPOSE: We explored and compared perspectives of reproductive endocrinology and infertility specialists (REIs) and in vitro fertilization (IVF) patients regarding polygenic embryo screening (PES), a new type of preimplantation screening that estimates the genetic chances of developing polygenic conditions and traits in the future. METHODS: Qualitative thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with US-based REIs and IVF patients. RESULTS: Clinicians and patients often held favorable views of screening embryos for physical or psychiatric conditions, though clinicians tended to temper their positive attitudes with specific caveats. Clinicians also expressed negative views about screening embryos for traits more frequently than patients, who generally held more positive views. Most clinicians were either unwilling to discuss or offer PES to patients or were willing to do so only under certain circumstances, while many patients expressed interest in PES. Both stakeholder groups envisioned multiple potential benefits or uses of PES and raised multiple potential, interrelated concerns about PES. CONCLUSION: A gap exists between clinician and patient attitudes toward PES; clinicians generally maintained reservations about such screening and patients indicated interest in it. Clinicians and patients sometimes imagined using PES to prepare for the birth of a predisposed or "affected" individual-a rationale that is often associated with prenatal testing. Many clinicians and patients held different attitudes depending on what is specifically screened, despite the sometimes blurry distinction between conditions and traits. Considerations raised by clinicians and patients may help guide professional societies in developing guidelines to navigate the uncertain terrain of PES.
Subject(s)
Fertilization in Vitro , Preimplantation Diagnosis , Humans , Female , Adult , Genetic Testing , Male , Multifactorial Inheritance/genetics , Pregnancy , Infertility/genetics , Infertility/psychology , Infertility/diagnosis , Qualitative Research , Attitude of Health PersonnelABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the levels of maternal and paternal attachment and the factors that affect them in individuals who had a baby after infertility treatment. METHODS: This study followed a descriptive cross-sectional design in accordance with STROBE guidelines. The research was conducted in the infertility clinic of a university hospital and included 128 participants, consisting of 64 mothers and 64 fathers. Data were collected using the 'Personal Information Form-Mother', 'Personal Information Form-Father', 'Maternal Attachment Inventory (MAI)', and 'Postnatal Paternal-Infant Attachment Questionnaire (PPAQ)'. RESULTS: The study found that the mothers had an average MAI score of 102.35 ± 3.05, while the fathers had an average PPAQ score of 82.21 ± 4.27. A significant correlation was observed between the mothers' MAI score and the duration of their marriage. Similarly, a significant correlation was observed between the fathers' PPAQ score and the duration of their marriage, the duration of their infertility diagnosis, and the duration of their infertility treatment (p < 0.05). The correlation analysis between the MAI score and the mean score of the PPAQ's subscale of pleasure in interaction was weakly significant and positive (r = 0.26; p = 0.032). However, there was no significant relationship between the MAI score and the PPAQ score (r = 0.18; p = 0.146). CONCLUSIONS: The study findings indicate that parents who conceive through infertility treatment exhibit high levels of attachment to their babies. Healthcare professionals should assess the attachment levels of both mothers and fathers who have undergone infertility treatment and be mindful of the factors that influence it.
Subject(s)
Father-Child Relations , Infertility , Mother-Child Relations , Object Attachment , Humans , Female , Cross-Sectional Studies , Male , Adult , Infertility/therapy , Infertility/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Infant , Infant, NewbornABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Infertility affects one in six women worldwide, playing a large role on an individual's psychosocial wellbeing and quality of life. The purpose of this review was to examine the experiences of Muslim women with infertility. METHODS: A Prisma-guided literature review was conducted in Scopus, CINAHL, PubMed, Embase, PsychInfo, and Google Scholar. Sample inclusion criteria included research that examined the psychosocial consequences of infertility in women, used a qualitative design, were from a Muslim majority country or specified participants were Muslim, and were published in the English-language since 2013. Thematic analysis was used to synthesize the findings into themes. RESULTS: Fourteen qualitative studies that explored the experiences of Muslim women with infertility were included for analysis. Women's responses were categorized into three focus areas: (1) emotional responses, (2) interpersonal relationships, and (3) social relationships. From these focus points, six overarching themes were identified that illustrated the challenges faced by Muslim women experiencing infertility: (1) identity crisis, (2) low self-esteem and depression, (3) abuse and harassment, (4) a weakened marital bond, (5) stigma, and (6) social exclusion and isolation . CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Review of the literature provided an initial entrée into understanding the experiences of Muslim women with infertility. Understanding the unique role of infertility within a religious community equips nurses and other providers with the knowledge that discussions surrounding infertility must be conducted with cultural sensitivity. Further research should be conducted to explore and offer culturally tailored educational materials that align with the religious preferences of Muslim women.