Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 1.845
Filter
1.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi ; 41(9): 1025-1031, 2024 Sep 10.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39217478

ABSTRACT

Chromosomal karyotyping analysis has been considered as the gold standard for cytogenetic diagnosis and an effective measure for preventing birth defects. However, conventional karyotyping analysis relies heavily on manual recognition, which is time-consuming and labor-intensive. The application of an efficient intelligent chromosomal karyotyping precise auxiliary diagnosis system in clinical practice can significantly reduce the analysis time and greatly improve the efficiency, increase the detection rate for low-percentage mosaicisms, and promote homogenization between laboratories. This can effectively enhance the capacity and level of cytogenetic diagnosis. With the continuous application of such system in the field of karyotyping analysis, a substantial amount of clinical application data and experience has been accumulated. This consensus has been formulated after multiple rounds of discussion by experts from the clinical application collaboration group of the efficient intelligent chromosomal karyotyping precise auxiliary diagnosis system. It aims to provide a reference for peers to better utilize intelligent auxiliary diagnosis systems during chromosomal karyotyping analysis and promote the standardized development of karyotyping analysis technology.


Subject(s)
Karyotyping , Karyotyping/methods , Humans , Consensus , Chromosome Disorders/diagnosis , Chromosome Disorders/genetics
2.
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol ; 63(5): 755-758, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39266160

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We present low-level mosaic trisomy 14 at amniocentesis. CASE REPORT: A 37-year-old, gravida 2, para 1, woman underwent amniocentesis at 18 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. This pregnancy was conceived by in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET). Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XX,+14 [4]/46,XX [27], consistent with 12.9% mosaicism for trisomy 14. Simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed the result of arr (1-22, X) × 2 with no genomic imbalance. Prenatal ultrasound findings were unremarkable. She was referred for genetic counseling at 21 weeks of gestation and was offered expanded non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) which was positive for trisomy 14. At 24 weeks of gestation, she underwent repeat amniocentesis which revealed a karyotype of 47,XX,+14 [2]/46,XX [26], consistent with 7% mosaicism for trisomy 14. The parental karyotypes were normal. Simultaneous aCGH analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed no genomic imbalance. Polymorphic marker analysis excluded uniparental disomy (UPD) 14. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis on 104 uncultured amniocytes detected no trisomy 14 cell. At 35 weeks of gestation, a 2315-g phenotypically normal baby was delivered. The umbilical cord and placenta had the karyotype of 46, XX (40/40 cells). aCGH analysis on the DNA extracted from peripheral blood and buccal mucosal cells at the age of three months revealed no genomic imbalance. The neonate was normal in phenotype and development during postnatal follow-ups. CONCLUSIONS: Low-level mosaic trisomy 14 at amniocentesis can be associated with cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes, perinatal progressive decrease of the trisomy 14 cell line and a favorable fetal outcome.


Subject(s)
Amniocentesis , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 14 , Comparative Genomic Hybridization , Mosaicism , Trisomy , Uniparental Disomy , Humans , Pregnancy , Female , Mosaicism/embryology , Trisomy/diagnosis , Trisomy/genetics , Adult , Uniparental Disomy/diagnosis , Uniparental Disomy/genetics , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 14/genetics , Infant, Newborn , Noninvasive Prenatal Testing/methods , Live Birth/genetics , Amnion/cytology , Pregnancy Outcome/genetics , Karyotyping/methods
3.
Orphanet J Rare Dis ; 19(1): 307, 2024 Aug 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39175064

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Congenital heart defect (CHD) is one of the most common birth defects. The aim of this cohort study was to evaluate the prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities and the clinical utility of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) in fetuses with different types of CHD, aiming to assist genetic counseling and clinical decision-making. METHODS: In this study, 642 fetuses with CHD were enrolled from a single center over a six-year period (2017-2022). Both conventional karyotyping and CMA were performed simultaneously on these fetuses. RESULTS: The diagnostic yield of CMA in fetuses with CHD in our study was 15.3% (98/642). Our findings revealed a significant increase in the diagnostic yield of CMA compared to karyotyping in fetuses with CHD. Among CHD subgroups, the diagnostic yields were high in complex CHD (34.9%), conotruncal defects (28.6%), right ventricular outflow tract obstructive defects (RVOTO) (25.9%), atrioventricular septal defects (AVSD) (25.0%) and left ventricular outflow tract obstructive defects (LVOTO) (24.1%), while those in other CHD (10.6%) and septal defects (10.9%) were relatively low. The overall detection rate of clinically significant chromosomal abnormalities was significantly higher in the non-isolated CHD group compared to the isolated CHD group (33.1% vs. 9.9%, P < 0.0001). Interestingly, numerical chromosomal abnormalities were more likely to occur in the non-isolated CHD group than in the isolated CHD group (20.3% vs. 2.0%, P < 0.0001). The rate of termination of pregnancy (TOP)/Still birth in the non-isolated CHD group was significantly higher than that in the isolated CHD group (40.5% vs. 20.6%, P < 0.0001). Compared to the isolated CHD group, the detection rate of clinically significant chromosomal abnormalities was significantly higher in the group of CHD with soft markers (35.6% vs. 9.9%, P < 0.0001) and in the group of CHD with additional structural anomalies (36.1% vs. 9.9%, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: CMA is a reliable and high-resolution technique that should be recommended as the front-line test for prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with CHD. The prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities varies greatly among different subgroups of CHD, and special attention should be given to prenatal non-isolated cases of CHD, especially those accompanied by additional structural anomalies or soft markers.


Subject(s)
Heart Defects, Congenital , Microarray Analysis , Prenatal Diagnosis , Humans , Heart Defects, Congenital/genetics , Female , Microarray Analysis/methods , Pregnancy , Prenatal Diagnosis/methods , Chromosome Aberrations , Cohort Studies , Adult , Karyotyping/methods , Fetus , China/epidemiology , East Asian People
4.
Genes (Basel) ; 15(8)2024 Aug 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39202459

ABSTRACT

Cytogenetic information about the product of conception (POC) is important to determine the presence of recurrent chromosomal abnormalities that are an indication for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy or structural rearrangements. Although microscopic examination by G-staining has long been used for such an evaluation, detection failures are relatively common with this method, due to cell-culture-related issues. The utility of low-coverage whole-genome sequencing (lcWGS) using short-read next-generation sequencing (NGS) has been highlighted recently as an alternative cytogenomic approach for POC analysis. We, here, performed comparative analysis of two NGS-based protocols for this purpose based on different short-read sequencers (the Illumina VeriSeq system using a MiSeq sequencer and the Thermo Fisher ReproSeq system using an Ion S5 sequencer). The cytogenomic diagnosis obtained with each NGS method was equivalent in each of 20 POC samples analyzed. Notably, X chromosome sequence reads were reduced in some female samples with both systems. The possibility of low-level mosaicism for monosomy X as an explanation for this was excluded by FISH analysis. Additional data from samples with various degrees of X chromosome aneuploidy suggested that it was a technical artifact related to X chromosome inactivation. Indeed, subsequent nanopore sequencing indicated that the DNA in the samples showing the artifact was predominantly unmethylated. Our current findings indicate that although X chromosome data must be interpreted with caution, both the systems we tested for NGS-based lcWGS are useful alternatives for the karyotyping of POC samples.


Subject(s)
Aneuploidy , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Karyotyping , Humans , Female , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/methods , Karyotyping/methods , Chromosomes, Human, X/genetics , Preimplantation Diagnosis/methods , Whole Genome Sequencing/methods , Pregnancy , Male
5.
Gene ; 928: 148781, 2024 Nov 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39029769

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to analyze the distribution of short interspersed elements (SINEs) in the chromosomes of five species of rodents of the genus Proechimys and in a variant karyotype of P. guyannensis. Molecular cytogenetic techniques were used to characterize the sequences of the B1, B4, MAR and THER SINEs, which were used as probes for hybridization in metaphase chromosomes. A wide distribution of SINEs was observed in the chromosomes of the Proechimys species examined, thus indicating differentiation of these retroelements. The signal of the B4 SINE was more evident than that of the B1 SINE, especially in P. echinothrix, P. longicaudatus, and P. cuvieri. Although the signal of the MAR SINE was more explosive than that of the THER SINE, in the species P. echinothrix, P. guyannensis (2n = 46) and P. longicaudatus, its distribution in the karyotypes was similar. The signals of these retroelements occurred at specific heterochromatic sites and were centromeric/pericentromeric and at the terminal regions in most chromosomes. This appears to be a typical distribution pattern of the SINEs and may indicate involvement with rearrangements during karyotypic diversification in Proechimys. The variation of the SINEs in the genome of Proechimys species demonstrates that these elements are distributed in a specific way in this genus and the preference for some sites, considered hotspots for chromosomal breakage, allows us to propose that these elements are related to the karyotypic evolution of Proechimys.


Subject(s)
Karyotype , Rodentia , Short Interspersed Nucleotide Elements , Animals , Rodentia/genetics , Rodentia/classification , Short Interspersed Nucleotide Elements/genetics , Genome/genetics , Chromosome Mapping , Karyotyping/methods , Evolution, Molecular , Chromosomes, Mammalian/genetics
6.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 310(3): 1555-1562, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38955819

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This is a retrospective comparative study. We aimed to analyze the results of karyotype and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) of amniotic fluid across different gestational weeks and evaluate the clinical value in prenatal diagnosis, particularly in the late pregnancies. METHODS: Samples from 580 pregnant women of 18-23 weeks of gestation (mid-gestation group) and 196 pregnant women of 24-32 weeks of gestation (late group) were performed both standard G-band karyotype analysis and CMA. RESULTS: Among the 580 pregnant women in the routine group, the most common indications were positive Down's screening (213/580, 36.7%), followed by advanced maternal age (196/580, 33.8%); while fetal structural anomalies on ultrasonography were the top reason for amniocentesis in the late group (56/196, 28.6%). In the routine group, the total detection rate was 12.1% (70/580), of which 4.1% (24/580) were identified by karyotype analysis and 11.2% (65/580) by CMA. The total detection rate was 15.3% (30/196) in the late group, of which 5.1% (10/196) were detected by karyotype analysis, and 14.3% (28/196) by CMA. CONCLUSION: Karyotype analysis and CMA are complementary in detecting chromosomal abnormalities. Amniotic cavity puncture in the karyotype analysis in 18-23 weeks of gestation and 24-32 weeks of gestation is safe and effective, more obvious effect on the latter.


Subject(s)
Amniocentesis , Karyotyping , Microarray Analysis , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Karyotyping/methods , Adult , Microarray Analysis/methods , Gestational Age , Chromosome Aberrations , Young Adult , Chromosome Disorders/diagnosis , Chromosome Disorders/genetics , Karyotype , Maternal Age , Prenatal Diagnosis/methods
7.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi ; 41(7): 803-806, 2024 Jul 10.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38946361

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To explore the application of an automatic slide-dropping instrument in bone marrow chromosomal karyotyping. METHODS: The effects of manual and automatic dropping methods under different environmental humidity were retrospectively analyzed, and the repeatability of the automatic dropping method was analyzed. RESULTS: No statistical difference was found between the results of automatic and manual dropping methods under the optimum ambient humidity and high humidity (P > 0.05). At low humidity, there was a statistical difference between the two methods (P < 0.05). With regard to the repeatability, the coefficient of variations of the automatic dropping method for the number of split phases, the rate of good dispersion and the rate of overlap were all lower than those of the manual dropping method. A statistical difference was also found in the number of split phases (P < 0.05) but not in the discrete excellent rate and overlapping rate between the two methods (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Better effect can be obtained by the automatic dropping instrument. It is suggested to gradually replace manual work with machine.


Subject(s)
Karyotyping , Humans , Karyotyping/methods , Adult , Female , Male , Bone Marrow , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult , Adolescent , Humidity , Automation , Child , Aged , Child, Preschool
8.
Eur J Med Res ; 29(1): 397, 2024 Jul 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39085968

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Posterior fossa malformation (PFM) is a relatively uncommon prenatal brain malformation. Genetic diagnostic approaches, including chromosome karyotyping, copy number variant (CNV) testing, and whole-exome sequencing (WES), have been applied in several cases of fetal structural malformations. However, the clinical value of appropriate genetic diagnostic approaches for different types of PFMs has not been confirmed. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to analyze the value of different combined genetic diagnostic approaches for various types of fetal PFMs. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted at Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital. Fifty-one pregnant women diagnosed with fetal PFMs who underwent genetic testing in our hospital from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2022 were enrolled; women with an isolated enlarged cisterna magna were excluded. All participants were categorized into two groups according to the presence of other abnormalities: isolated and non-isolated PFMs groups. Different combined approaches, including karyotype analysis, CNV testing, and trio-based WES, were used for genetic analysis. The detection rates of karyotype analysis, CNV testing, and WES were measured in the isolated and non-isolated groups. RESULTS: In isolated PFMs, pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) CNVs were detected in four cases (36.36%, 4/11), whereas G-banding karyotyping and WES showed negative results. In non-isolated PFMs, a sequential genetic approach showed a detection rate of 47.5% (19/40); karyotyping revealed aneuploidies in five cases (16.67%, 5/30), CNV testing showed P/LP CNVs in five cases (16.13%, 5/31), and WES identified P/LP variants (in genes CEP20, TMEM67, OFD1, PTPN11, ARID1A, and SMARCA4) in nine cases (40.91%, 9/22). WES showed a detection rate of 83.33% (5/6) in fetuses with Joubert syndrome. Only six patients (five with Blake's pouch cyst and one with unilateral cerebellar hemisphere dysplasia) survived. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend CNV testing for fetuses with isolated PFMs. A sequential genetic approach (karyotyping, CNV testing, and WES) may be beneficial in fetuses with non-isolated PFMs. Particularly, we recommend WES as the first-line genetic diagnostic tool for Joubert syndrome.


Subject(s)
DNA Copy Number Variations , Exome Sequencing , Karyotyping , Prenatal Diagnosis , Humans , Female , DNA Copy Number Variations/genetics , Pregnancy , Karyotyping/methods , Exome Sequencing/methods , Prenatal Diagnosis/methods , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Genetic Testing/methods , Cranial Fossa, Posterior/abnormalities
9.
Mol Biol Rep ; 51(1): 872, 2024 Jul 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39080034

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Agenesis of the corpus callosum (ACC) is an anomaly that can occur in fetuses during pregnancy. However, there is currently no treatment for fetal ACC. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective analysis of obstetric outcomes of fetal ACC to explore the relationship between fetal ACC phenotypes and chromosomal copy number abnormalities. METHODS AND RESULTS: Amniotic fluid or umbilical cord blood were extracted from pregnant women with fetal ACC for karyotype analysis and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA). Among the 48 fetuses with ACC, 22 (45.8%, 22/48) had isolated ACC, and 26 (54.2%, 26/48) had non-isolated ACC. Chromosomal abnormalities were detected via karyotype analysis in four cases. In addition to the four cases of pathogenic copy number variations (CNVs) detected using karyotype analysis, CMA revealed two cases of pathogenic CNVs with 17q12 microduplication and 16p12.2 microdeletion. The obstetric outcomes of 26 patients with non-isolated ACC were followed up, and 17 chose to terminate the pregnancy. In addition, seven of the nine cases with non-isolated ACC showed no obvious abnormality during postnatal follow-up, whereas only one case with normal CMA showed an abnormal phenotype at six months. Of the 22 patients with isolated ACC, six chose to terminate the pregnancy. Postnatal follow-up of 16 isolated ACC cases revealed only one with benign CNV, presenting with intellectual disability. CONCLUSION: Pregnant women with fetal ACC should be offered prenatal CMA, particularly non-isolated ACC. Patients with ACC should undergo prolonged postnatal follow-up, and appropriate intervention should be provided if necessary.


Subject(s)
Agenesis of Corpus Callosum , Chromosome Aberrations , DNA Copy Number Variations , Karyotyping , Humans , Female , Agenesis of Corpus Callosum/genetics , Pregnancy , DNA Copy Number Variations/genetics , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Karyotyping/methods , Follow-Up Studies , Fetus , Prenatal Diagnosis/methods , Male
10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39054004

ABSTRACT

Genetic toxicology, strategically located at the intersection of genetics and toxicology, aims to demystify the complex interplay between exogenous agents and our genetic blueprint. Telomeres, the protective termini of chromosomes, play instrumental roles in cellular longevity and genetic stability. Traditionally karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH), have been indispensable tools for chromosomal analysis following exposure to genotoxic agents. However, their scope in discerning nuanced molecular dynamics is limited. Peptide Nucleic Acids (PNAs) are synthetic entities that embody characteristics of both proteins and nucleic acids and have emerged as potential game-changers. This perspective report comprehensively examines the vast potential of PNAs in genetic toxicology, with a specific emphasis on telomere research. PNAs' superior resolution and precision make them a favourable choice for genetic toxicological assessments. The integration of PNAs in contemporary analytical workflows heralds a promising evolution in genetic toxicology, potentially revolutionizing diagnostics, prognostics, and therapeutic avenues. In this timely review, we attempted to assess the limitations of current PNA-FISH methodology and recommend refinements.


Subject(s)
In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Peptide Nucleic Acids , Telomere , Telomere/drug effects , Telomere/genetics , Humans , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence/methods , Animals , Mutagens/toxicity , Karyotyping/methods
11.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(30): e39046, 2024 Jul 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39058883

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Chromosome 18p deletion syndrome is caused by total or partial deletion of the short arm of chromosome 18 and associated with cognitive impairment, growth retardation and mild facial dysmorphism. However, most studies on the genotype-phenotype correlations in the 18p region are diagnosed postnatally. Prenatal reports involving 18p deletions are limited. METHODS: Three pregnant women opted for invasive prenatal testing due to noninvasive prenatal testing indicating high risk for chromosome 18 abnormalities. Karyotypic analysis and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) were performed simultaneously. The pregnancy outcomes for all cases were followed up. Meanwhile, we also made a literature review on prenatal phenotypes of 18p deletions. RESULTS: G-banding analysis showed that 2 fetuses presented abnormal karyotypes: 45,XN,der(18)t(18;21)(p11; q11),-21 (case 2) and 46,XN,18p- (case 3). The karyotype of case 1 was normal. Meanwhile, CMA detected 4.37 Mb (case 1), 7.26 Mb (case 2) and 14.97 Mb (case 3) deletions in chromosome 18p region. All 3 pregnancies were terminated finally according to genetic counseling based upon abnormal CMA results. CONCLUSION: Prenatal diagnosis of 18p deletion syndrome is full of challenges due to the phenotypic diversity, incomplete penetrance and lack of prenatal phenotypes. Increased nuchal translucency and holoprosencephaly are common prenatal phenotypes of distal 18p deletion. For fetuses carrying 18p deletions with atypical sonographic phenotypes, noninvasive prenatal testing could be adopted as an effective approach.


Subject(s)
Chromosome Deletion , Chromosome Disorders , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 18 , Microarray Analysis , Prenatal Diagnosis , Humans , Female , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 18/genetics , Pregnancy , Microarray Analysis/methods , Prenatal Diagnosis/methods , Adult , Chromosome Disorders/diagnosis , Chromosome Disorders/genetics , Karyotyping/methods
12.
Methods Mol Biol ; 2825: 3-37, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38913301

ABSTRACT

The promises of the cancer genome sequencing project, combined with various -omics technologies, have raised questions about the importance of cancer cytogenetic analyses. It is suggested that DNA sequencing provides high resolution, speed, and automation, potentially replacing cytogenetic testing. We disagree with this reductionist prediction. On the contrary, various sequencing projects have unexpectedly challenged gene theory and highlighted the importance of the genome or karyotype in organizing gene network interactions. Consequently, profiling the karyotype can be more meaningful than solely profiling gene mutations, especially in cancer where karyotype alterations mediate cellular macroevolution dominance. In this chapter, recent studies that illustrate the ultimate importance of karyotype in cancer genomics and evolution are briefly reviewed. In particular, the long-ignored non-clonal chromosome aberrations or NCCAs are linked to genome or chromosome instability, genome chaos is linked to genome reorganization under cellular crisis, and the two-phased cancer evolution reconciles the relationship between genome alteration-mediated punctuated macroevolution and gene mutation-mediated stepwise microevolution. By further synthesizing, the concept of karyotype coding is discussed in the context of information management. Altogether, we call for a new era of cancer cytogenetics and cytogenomics, where an array of technical frontiers can be explored further, which is crucial for both basic research and clinical implications in the cancer field.


Subject(s)
Chromosome Aberrations , Genomics , Neoplasms , Humans , Cytogenetic Analysis/methods , Cytogenetics/methods , Genomics/methods , Karyotyping/methods , Mutation , Neoplasms/genetics
13.
Methods Mol Biol ; 2825: 39-65, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38913302

ABSTRACT

Based on classical karyotyping, structural genome variations (SVs) have generally been considered to be either "simple" (with one or two breakpoints) or "complex" (with more than two breakpoints). Studying the breakpoints of SVs at nucleotide resolution revealed additional, subtle structural variations, such that even "simple" SVs turned out to be "complex." Genome-wide sequencing methods, such as fosmid and paired-end mapping, short-read and long-read whole genome sequencing, and single-molecule optical mapping, also indicated that the number of SVs per individual was considerably larger than expected from karyotyping and high-resolution chromosomal array-based studies. Interestingly, SVs were detected in studies of cohorts of individuals without clinical phenotypes. The common denominator of all SVs appears to be a failure to accurately repair DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) or to halt cell cycle progression if DSBs persist. This review discusses the various DSB response mechanisms during the mitotic cell cycle and during meiosis and their regulation. Emphasis is given to the molecular mechanisms involved in the formation of translocations, deletions, duplications, and inversions during or shortly after meiosis I. Recently, CRISPR-Cas9 studies have provided unexpected insights into the formation of translocations and chromothripsis by both breakage-fusion-bridge and micronucleus-dependent mechanisms.


Subject(s)
DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded , Genomic Structural Variation , Humans , Meiosis/genetics , Karyotyping/methods , CRISPR-Cas Systems , Animals
14.
Methods Mol Biol ; 2825: 79-111, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38913304

ABSTRACT

Cytogenetic analysis has traditionally focused on the clonal chromosome aberrations, or CCAs, and considered the large number of diverse non-clonal chromosome aberrations, or NCCAs, as insignificant noise. Our decade-long karyotype evolutionary studies have unexpectedly demonstrated otherwise. Not only the baseline of NCCAs is associated with fuzzy inheritance, but the frequencies of NCCAs can also be used to reliably measure genome or chromosome instability (CIN). According to the Genome Architecture Theory, CIN is the common driver of cancer evolution that can unify diverse molecular mechanisms, and genome chaos, including chromothripsis, chromoanagenesis, and polypoidal giant nuclear and micronuclear clusters, and various sizes of chromosome fragmentations, including extrachromosomal DNA, represent some extreme forms of NCCAs that play a key role in the macroevolutionary transition. In this chapter, the rationale, definition, brief history, and current status of NCCA research in cancer are discussed in the context of two-phased cancer evolution and karyotype-coded system information. Finally, after briefly describing various types of NCCAs, we call for more research on NCCAs in future cytogenetics.


Subject(s)
Chromosome Aberrations , Neoplasms , Humans , Neoplasms/genetics , Chromosomal Instability , Cytogenetic Analysis/methods , Karyotyping/methods
15.
Methods Mol Biol ; 2825: 137-150, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38913307

ABSTRACT

Chromosome banding can be defined as the lengthwise variation in staining properties along a chromosome stained with a dye. Chromosome banding became more practical in the early 1970s and is an essential technique used in karyotyping to identify human chromosomes for both clinical and research purposes. Most importantly, karyotyping is now considered a mandatory investigation of all newly diagnosed leukemias. Some banding methods, such as Giemsa (G)-, reverse (R)-, and centromere (C)-banding, still contribute greatly by being used as a routine procedure in clinical cytogenetic laboratory nowadays. Each chromosome has a unique sequence of bar code-like stripes, allowing the identification of individual homologues and the recognition of structural abnormalities through analyzing the disruption of the normal banding pattern at specific landmarks, regions, and bands as described in the ideogram. Since the quality of metaphases obtained from malignant cells is generally inferior to normal constitutional cells for karyotyping, a practical and accurate chromosome identification training guide is indispensable for a trainee or newly employed cytogenetic technologist in a cancer cytogenetic laboratory. The most common and currently used banding methods and chromosome recognition guide for distinguishable bands of each chromosome are described in detail in this chapter with an aim to facilitate quick and accurate karyotyping in cancer cells.


Subject(s)
Chromosome Banding , Karyotyping , Humans , Karyotyping/methods , Chromosomes, Human/genetics , Metaphase
16.
Methods Mol Biol ; 2825: 263-280, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38913315

ABSTRACT

Karyotype coding, which encompasses the complete chromosome sets and their topological genomic relationships within a given species, encodes system-level information that organizes and preserves genes' function, and determines the macroevolution of cancer. This new recognition emphasizes the crucial role of karyotype characterization in cancer research. To advance this cancer cytogenetic/cytogenomic concept and its platforms, this study outlines protocols for monitoring the karyotype landscape during treatment-induced rapid drug resistance in cancer. It emphasizes four key perspectives: combinational analyses of phenotype and karyotype, a focus on the entire evolutionary process through longitudinal analysis, a comparison of whole landscape dynamics by including various types of NCCAs (including genome chaos), and the use of the same process to prioritize different genomic scales. This protocol holds promise for studying numerous evolutionary aspects of cancers, and it further enhances the power of karyotype analysis in cancer research.


Subject(s)
Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Karyotype , Karyotyping , Neoplasms , Humans , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/genetics , Neoplasms/genetics , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Karyotyping/methods , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Evolution, Molecular , Phenotype
17.
PLoS One ; 19(6): e0303350, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38875276

ABSTRACT

In this cross-sectional prospective study, advanced next-generation sequencing technology was used to compare the molecular karyotyping of individual human sperm cells in infertile couples with severe oligoteratozoospermia (i.e., low sperm count and motility) to those of infertile couples with normal semen. Fourteen infertile couples who were patients at Ramathibodi Hospital in Bangkok, Thailand, were recruited from January to November 2023, and they were categorized into two groups based on semen analysis results. The study group comprised couples with severe oligoteratozoospermia, whereas the control group exhibited normal semen. Individual sperm cells from the semen samples were isolated by the micromanipulation technique for subsequent whole-genome amplification and next-generation sequencing, where the primary outcome was the aneuploidy rate. Seventy individual sperm cells were isolated with a 90% success rate for amplification. The next-generation sequencing results showed that the aneuploidy rate was 25%-75%, with a mean of 48.28% in the study group. In contrast, the control group exhibited aneuploidy rates of 0-75%, with a mean of 15.15%. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (odds ratio: 5.8, 95% confidence interval: 1.30-26.03). Sperm cells of the study group showed a threefold higher aneuploidy rate than those in the control group, even though the sperm cells were selected by micromanipulation for their normal morphology. Comprehensive counseling is recommended to address elevated aneuploidy rates that potentially surpass those of the general infertile population. Guidance on preimplantation genetic testing is also recommended to ensure the transfer of embryos with normal chromosomes.


Subject(s)
Aneuploidy , Oligospermia , Spermatozoa , Humans , Male , Cross-Sectional Studies , Prospective Studies , Adult , Spermatozoa/metabolism , Oligospermia/genetics , Oligospermia/pathology , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Semen Analysis/methods , Karyotyping/methods , Infertility, Male/genetics , Single-Cell Analysis/methods
18.
Gac Med Mex ; 160(1): 76-85, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38753554

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Chromosomal abnormalities are present in 50 to 60% of miscarriages and in 6 to 19% of stillbirths. Although microarrays are preferred for studying chromosomal abnormalities, many hospitals cannot offer this methodology. OBJECTIVE: To present the results of the cytogenetic analysis of 303 products of conception (POC), which included 184 miscarriages, 49 stillbirths and 17 cases of undefined age. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Karyotyping, fluorescence in situ hybridization, short tandem repeats and microarrays were used, depending on the type of loss and available sample. RESULTS: In 29 POCs we found maternal tissue and were eliminated from the analyses. Informative results were obtained in 250 (91.2 %)/274 cases; the karyotyping success rate was 80.7%; that of single nucleotide polymorphism microarrays, 94.5%; and that of fluorescence in situ hybridization and short tandem repeat, 100%. Cytogenetic abnormalities were observed in 57.6% of miscarriages and in 24.5% of stillbirths; 94% of total anomalies were numerical and 6% were submicroscopic. CONCLUSIONS: Karyotyping with simultaneous short tandem repeat study to rule out contamination of maternal cells is effective for studying miscarriages; in stillbirths, microarrays are recommended.


ANTECEDENTES: Las alteraciones cromosómicas están presentes en 50 a 60 % de los abortos espontáneos y en 6 a 19 % de los mortinatos. Aunque se prefieren los microarreglos para estudiarlos, numerosos hospitales no pueden ofrecerlos. OBJETIVO: Presentar los resultados del estudio citogenético de 303 productos de la concepción (POC), 184 se obtuvieron de abortos espontáneos, 49 fueron mortinatos y en 17 no se identificó la de edad gestacional. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se empleó cariotipo, hibridación in situ con fluorescencia, secuencias cortas repetidas en tándem y microarreglos, según el tipo de pérdida y la muestra disponible. RESULTADOS: En 29 POC se encontró tejido materno, por lo que fueron eliminados de los análisis. En 250 (91.2 %)/274 casos se obtuvieron resultados informativos; la tasa de éxito del cariotipo fue de 80.7 %; la de los microarreglos de SNP, de 94.5 %; y la de la hibridación fluorescente in situ y la repetición corta en tándem, de 100 %. Se observaron anomalías citogenéticas en 57.6 % de los abortos espontáneos y en 24.5 % de los mortinatos; 94 % de las anomalías fueron numéricas y 6 %, submicroscópicas. CONCLUSIONES: El cariotipo en conjunto con el estudio de secuencias cortas repetidas en tándem para descartar contaminación de células maternas es efectivo para estudiar abortos espontáneos; los microarreglos se recomiendan en los mortinatos.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Spontaneous , Chromosome Aberrations , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Karyotyping , Humans , Female , Abortion, Spontaneous/epidemiology , Abortion, Spontaneous/genetics , Mexico/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Karyotyping/methods , Stillbirth/genetics , Stillbirth/epidemiology , Adult , Cytogenetic Analysis/methods , Microsatellite Repeats , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Young Adult
19.
Life Sci Alliance ; 7(8)2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38777370

ABSTRACT

The B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cell line REH, with the t(12;21) ETV6::RUNX1 translocation, is known to have a complex karyotype defined by a series of large-scale chromosomal rearrangements. Taken from a 15-yr-old at relapse, the cell line offers a practical model for the study of pediatric B-ALL. In recent years, short- and long-read DNA and RNA sequencing have emerged as a complement to karyotyping techniques in the resolution of structural variants in an oncological context. Here, we explore the integration of long-read PacBio and Oxford Nanopore whole-genome sequencing, IsoSeq RNA sequencing, and short-read Illumina sequencing to create a detailed genomic and transcriptomic characterization of the REH cell line. Whole-genome sequencing clarified the molecular traits of disrupted ALL-associated genes including CDKN2A, PAX5, BTG1, VPREB1, and TBL1XR1, as well as the glucocorticoid receptor NR3C1 Meanwhile, transcriptome sequencing identified seven fusion genes within the genomic breakpoints. Together, our extensive whole-genome investigation makes high-quality open-source data available to the leukemia genomics community.


Subject(s)
Whole Genome Sequencing , Humans , Cell Line, Tumor , Whole Genome Sequencing/methods , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/methods , Translocation, Genetic/genetics , Oncogene Proteins, Fusion/genetics , Genomics/methods , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/genetics , Transcriptome/genetics , Gene Expression Profiling/methods , Core Binding Factor Alpha 2 Subunit/genetics , Karyotyping/methods , Sequence Analysis, RNA/methods
20.
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol ; 63(3): 394-397, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38802205

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We present low-level mosaic trisomy 21 at amniocentesis in a pregnancy with a favorable fetal outcome. CASE REPORT: A 38-year-old, gravida 2, para 1, woman underwent amniocentesis at 17 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,+21[4]/46,XY[34]. Prenatal ultrasound findings were normal. At 27 weeks of gestation, she was referred for genetic counseling, and the cultured amniocytes had a karyotype of 47,XY,+21[2]/46,XY[26]. Quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes and parental bloods excluded uniparental disomy (UPD) 21. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis on uncultured amniocytes revealed 30% (30/100 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 21. Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed the result of arr 21q11.2q22.3 × 2.25, consistent with 20%-30% mosaicism for trisomy 21. The parental karyotypes were normal. The woman was advised to continue the pregnancy, and a 3510-g phenotypically normal male baby was delivered at 39 weeks of gestation. Cytogenetic analysis of the cord blood, umbilical cord and placenta revealed the karyotypes of 47,XY,+21[1]/46,XY[39], 47,XY,+21[2]/46,XY[38] and 46,XY in 40/40 cells, respectively. When follow-up at age 1 year and 2 months, the neonate was normal in phenotype and development. The peripheral blood had a karyotype of 46,XY in 40/40 cells, and interphase FISH analysis on uncultured buccal mucosal cells showed 6.4% (7/109 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 21. CONCLUSION: Low-level mosaic trisomy 21 at amniocentesis can be associated with cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes, perinatal progressive decrease of the trisomy 21 cell line and a favorable fetal outcome.


Subject(s)
Amniocentesis , Comparative Genomic Hybridization , Down Syndrome , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Mosaicism , Humans , Pregnancy , Female , Mosaicism/embryology , Adult , Down Syndrome/genetics , Down Syndrome/diagnosis , Infant, Newborn , Cell Line , Cells, Cultured , Karyotyping/methods , Amnion/cytology , Male
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL