Surgical interventions for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review with network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Several surgical options for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) are available, but current guidelines do not recommend which one should be prioritized. Although previous network meta-analyses (NMAs) have been performed on this topic, they have major methodological problems and could not provide the convincing evidence and clinical practical information required. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing at least two surgical interventions were included by searching AMED, CINAHL, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and MEDLINE (inception to August 2023). A frequentist random-effects NMA was performed for physical function and adverse events due to any reason. For physical function, three follow-up time points were included: short-term (< 6 months post-intervention), mid-term (≥ 6 months but < 12 months), and long-term (≥ 12 months). Laminectomy was the reference comparison intervention. RESULTS: A total of 43 RCTs involving 5017 participants were included in the systematic review and 28 RCTs encompassing 14 types of surgical interventions were included in the NMA. For improving physical function (scale 0-100), endoscopic-assisted laminotomy (mean difference: - 8.61, 95% confidence interval: - 10.52 to - 6.69; moderate-quality evidence), laminectomy combined with Coflex (- 8.41, - 13.21 to - 3.61; moderate quality evidence), and X-stop (- 6.65, - 8.60 to - 4.71; low-quality evidence) had small effects at short-term follow-up; no statistical difference was observed at mid-term follow-up (very low- to low-quality evidence); at long-term follow-up, endoscopic-assisted laminotomy (- 7.02, - 12.95 to - 1.08; very low-quality evidence) and X-stop (- 10.04, - 18.16 to - 1.93; very low-quality evidence) had a small and moderate effect, respectively. Compared with laminectomy, endoscopic-assisted laminotomy was associated with fewer adverse events due to any reason (odds ratio: 0.27, 0.09 to 0.86; low-quality evidence). CONCLUSIONS: For adults with degenerative LSS, endoscopic-assisted laminotomy may be the safest and most effective intervention in improving physical function. However, the available data were insufficient to indicate whether the effect was sustainable after 6 months. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42018094180).

[Current research status and prospects for clinical application of robotics in spinal surgery].

With the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence and the increasing integration of medical engineering, robot-assisted (RA) technology in spinal surgery has made significant strides, with its clinical application range continuously expanding. This article provides a comprehensive review of relevant literature on spinal surgery robots over the past decade, summarizing recent advancements in screw placement techniques such as cervical, thoracic, and lumbar pedicle screws; cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screws; cervical lateral mass screws; and S2 sacroiliac (S2AI) screws. It also discusses RA-guided targeted puncture and endoscope placement through intervertebral foramen as well as decompressive laminectomy procedures. Furthermore, this article systematically analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of RA technology while elucidating its accuracy, safety, and practicality. We believe that this article will help clinicians to gain a deeper understanding of the current clinical application status of spinal surgery robots while promoting further enhancements and wider adoption of RA technology to ultimately benefit more patients.

Traumatic multiple-level continuous and noncontinuous thoracolumbar spinal fractures management in adult patients: A single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to describe our clinical experience with surgical approaches and patient management for traumatic multiple-level continuous and noncontinuous thoracolumbar spinal fractures. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients with continuous and noncontinuous multiple-level thoracolumbar fractures who were operated on by the same surgical team from 2019 to 2021. These patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (n=12, continuous fractures) and Group 2 (n=14, noncontinuous fractures). We assessed the patients' age, gender, fracture levels, fracture type, classification according to the AO (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen) Spine Thoracolumbar Fracture Classification, status of posterior ligament damage, presence of additional traumatic pathology, status of decompression via laminectomy, levels of stabilization and fusion, preoperative and postoperative neurological status, presence of cervical trauma, duration of operation, amount of blood loss, duration of hospitalization, and lordosis and kyphosis angles in terms of fusion status and postoperative follow-up over two years. The study excluded patients over the age of 65, those with single-level fractures, and pathological fractures caused by osteoporosis, infection, or spinal tumors. RESULTS: Gender, age, neurological status, application of laminectomy, surgical complications, status of cervical fracture, duration of operation, amount of blood loss, duration of hospitalization, lordosis, and kyphosis angles were uniformly distributed between the groups. All patients underwent fusions, ranging from three to eight, with a median of two (range 2-4) fracture levels, and a median of five instrumented vertebrae, ranging from four to seven. Significant differences between the two groups were observed in terms of operation duration (p=0.001), blood loss (p=0.010), duration of hospitalization (p=0.003), number of fusions (p<0.001), and instrumented vertebral segments (p=0.011). CONCLUSION: Thus, a surgical approach involving decompression, vertebral fusion screws, allografts, and bone substitutes can enhance surgical outcomes for patients with continuous and noncontinuous vertebral fractures.

Comparative efficacy of unilateral biportal and percutaneous endoscopic techniques in unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) for lumbar spinal stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) has yielded positive results in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Unilateral biportal ULBD (UB-ULBD) and percutaneous endoscopic ULBD (PE-ULBD) are gaining popularity because of the progress that has been made in minimally invasive surgery (MIS). The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the radiographic and clinical results of UB-ULBD and PE-ULBD. METHODS: This study retrospectively enrolled patients who underwent ULBD surgery for LSS. The patients were categorized into two groups on the basis of the surgical method: the UB-ULBD group and the PE-ULBD group. Data on the general demographic data, surgical details, clinical efficacy, radiography and complications were compared between the two groups were compared. The minimum follow-up duration was 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 113 LSS patients who had undergone ULBD at our institution were included, of whom 61 patients underwent UB-ULBD surgery and 52 underwent PE-ULBD surgery. The UB-ULBD group had a significantly shorter operation time (P < 0.05). The facet was significantly better preserved in the UB-ULBD group than in the PE-ULBD group, and the angle of ipsilateral facet joint resection in the UE-ULBD group was significantly smaller (P < 0.05). The ODI score, VAS score and modified Macnab criteria improved postoperatively in both groups. The UB-ULBD group had a 95.08% rate of excellent or good patient outcomes, whereas the PE-ULBD group had a 92.30% rate. CONCLUSION: Both UB-ULBD and PE-ULBD can provide favourable clinical outcomes when used to treat LSS. UB-ULBD is beneficial because of its shorter operation time, smaller angle of ipsilateral facet joint resection and better facet preservation, making it a viable and safe option for treating LSS while ensuring spinal stability.

Decoding pediatric spinal tumors: a single-center retrospective case series on etiology, presentation, therapeutic strategies, and outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Spinal tumors (ST) often result in dire prognosis, carrying risks such as permanent paralysis, sensory loss, and sphincter dysfunction. Data on their incidence and etiology in pediatric populations are markedly scant. Our study investigates the etiology, clinical manifestation, treatment, and outcomes of pediatric ST. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of our institutional pediatric oncology and neurosurgery database, examining 14 patients under 18 years admitted with ST due to oncological diseases since 2005. We analyzed the clinical presentations, evaluations, molecular diagnostics and treatments for these patients. RESULTS: The study spanned 15 years and included 14 pediatric patients, each diagnosed with distinct spinal tumor entity. The mean patient age was approximately 19.6 ± 10.1 months. Severe axial pain along the vertebral column was observed in 13 patients, while acute neurological deterioration manifested in 7 patients. As a first-line intervention, 13 patients underwent decompressive surgery through laminectomy and tumor resection, and only one patient received chemotherapy solely. Before surgery, seven patients were unable to walk; post-surgery, six of them regained their ability to ambulate. The diagnosis encompassed a range of neoplasms: two instances of Ewing sarcoma, 3 instances of teratoma, one case presenting an atypical teratoid Rhabdoid tumor, two instances each of low-grade astrocytoma and neuroblastoma, and single instances of ependymoma, meningioma, rhabdomyosarcoma, and embryonal tumors with multilayered rosettes (ETMRs). Three patients succumbed two years after initiating therapy. CONCLUSION: Despite their rarity, intraspinal tumors in pediatric patients pose substantial therapeutic challenges. The intertwined complexities of the disease entity and the patient's neurological status demand swift initiation of an individualized therapeutic strategy. This crucial step helps optimize outcomes for this patient cohort, who frequently grapple with debilitating health conditions. Inclusion of these patients within a registry is mandatory to optimize treatment outcomes due to their rarity in pediatric population.

[Application of ultrasonic bone scalpel system for laminectomy and posterior longitudinal ligament ossification block release combined with dekyphosis orthopedic surgery in treatment of multisegmental thoracic ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament].

Objective: To explore the safety and effectiveness of multisegmental thoracic ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (T-OPLL) treated by laminectomy, posterior longitudinal ligament ossification block release combined with dekyphosis orthopedic surgery using ultrasonic bone scalpel system. Methods: The clinical data of 8 patients with multisegmental T-OPLL treated with laminectomy, posterior longitudinal ligament ossification block release combined with dekyphosis orthopedic surgery using ultrasonic bone scalpel system between January 2020 and April 2023 was retrospectively analyzed. There were 3 males and 5 females; the age ranged from 41 to 67 years, with a mean of 57.1 years. The disease duration ranged from 3 to 74 months, with a mean of 33.4 months. Symptoms were progressive numbness and weakness of both lower limbs, unsteady walking, chest and back pain in 3 cases, and urinary and bowel dysfunction in 5 cases; 7 cases showed increased muscle strength of the lower limbs, hyperreflexia of the tendons, and a positive Babinski sign, and 1 case showed decreased muscle strength of the lower limbs, decreased skin sensation, decreased knee and Achilles tendon reflexes, and a negative pathologic sign. Multisegmental posterior longitudinal ligament ossification of thoracic spine was found in 8 cases, with 4-8 segments of ossification, and in 5 cases with multisegmental ossification of the ligamentum flavum. The preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) thoracic spinal function score was 4.3±0.9, the visual analogue scale (VAS) score was 6.9±1.0, and the the kyphotic Cobb angle of the stenosis segment was (34.62±10.76)°. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and complications were recorded. VAS score was used to evaluate the back pain, JOA score was used to evaluate the thoracic spinal cord function and the JOA improvement rate was calculated, and the kyphotic Cobb angle of the stenosis segment was measured and the Cobb angle improvement rate was calculated. Results: The operation time ranged from 210 to 340 minutes, with a mean of 271.62 minutes; intraoperative blood loss ranged from 900 to 2 100 mL, with a mean of 1 458.75 mL; the number of resected vertebral plates ranged from 4 to 8, with a mean of 6.1; dural tears and cerebrospinal fluid leakage occurred in 3 cases, and the incisions healed by first intention. All 8 cases were followed up 12-26 months, with a mean of 18.3 months. There was no complication such as loosening of internal fixator, breakage of screws and rods, and no significant progress of ossification. At last follow-up, the VAS score was 1.4±0.7, the JOA thoracic spinal function score was 9.8±0.7, and the the kyphotic Cobb angle of the stenosis segment was (22.12±8.28)°, all of which significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones ( t=11.887, P<0.001; t=13.015, P<0.001; t=7.395, P<0.001). The JOA improvement rate was 81.06%±10.93%, of which 5 cases were rated as excellent and 3 cases as good; the Cobb angle improvement rate was 36.51%±14.20%. Conclusion: Laminectomy, posterior longitudinal ligament ossification block release combined with dekyphosis orthopedic surgery using ultrasonic bone scalpel system is a safe, effective, and simple method for the treatment of multisegmental T-OPLL, which is a feasible option.

A patient with cervical ligamentum flavum haematoma: case report.

INTRODUCTION: Ligamentum flavum haematoma (LFH) is an extremely rare entity, found mostly in the lumbar and thoracic ligamentum flavum and seldom in the cervical ligamentum flavum. Cervical LFH can cause paralysis in patients. We describe a case of LFH in the cervical spine that accepted surgical treatment. CASE PRESENTATION: A 70-year-old man with incomplete spinal cord injury presented with sudden paralysis of his left limbs for 10 days and hemi-hypaesthesia below the level of the right clavicle. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a space-occupying lesion in the left ligamentum flavum between the C4 and C5 laminae. The preliminary diagnoses were concluded to be incomplete spinal cord injury, spinal epidural lesions, and cervical spinal stenosis. After a posterior C3-C6 laminectomy with lateral mass screw instrumentation, the muscle strength and sensation recovered partially. The lesion was greyish black and located in the ligamentum flavum. A pathological examination identified it as a haematoma of the ligamentum flavum. The patient was discharged 15 days after the operation and commenced rehabilitation. DISCUSSION: The LFH was mainly caused by slight trauma during gentle activities and contributed by many factors. MRI is an essential tool but pathological diagnosis is the gold standard. Most LFH patients can be treated surgically.

Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery for Lumbar Laminectomy and Diskectomy: Postoperative Outcomes and Surgical Learning Curve, a Single US Surgeon's Experience.

INTRODUCTION: Biportal endoscopic spine surgery (BESS) has gained traction for lumbar laminectomy and diskectomy. To justify the transition to BESS, outcomes and the surgical learning curve should be known. This study evaluates rates of complications with BESS and how these rates change with increased surgeon experience. METHODS: A single surgeon's consecutive patients who underwent BESS were evaluated. Patients older than 18 years who underwent BESS for lumbar laminectomy and diskectomy were included. Patients with previous spine surgery, multiple levels, or BESS for fusion were excluded. Demographics, length of surgery, intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, and revision surgery were recorded. The learning phase group and mastery phase group were based on a cumulative summation analysis based on surgical time. RESULTS: A total of 63 patients, with 31 and 32 patients in the learning and mastery group, respectively, were included. Surgical time decreased from 87 to 52 minutes in the mastery phase. Conversion to open decreased from 3 to 0 cases (P = 0.1803), intraoperative complications decreased from 3 to 0 (P = 0.1803), postoperative complications decreased from 7 to 2 (P = 0.017), and rates of revision surgery decreased from 4 to 1 (P = 0.4233). CONCLUSION: This study suggests a learning curve of 31 cases for adequate performance of BESS for lumbar laminectomy and diskectomy.

Vascular loops mimicking herniated lumbar discs: fair warning.

The authors report their experience with twenty-one consecutive patients who presented with symptoms and imaging characteristics of a herniated lumbar disc; of whom, at the time of surgery had a vascular loop instead. The procedure was performed on 14 women and seven men with a mean age of 39 years. Clinical complaints included lumbar aching with one limb overt radiculopathy in all patients; with additional sphincter dysfunction in two cases. Symptoms had developed within a mean period of three months. In all patients, the disc was exposed through an L5-S1 (n = 10); L4-L5 (n = 5) and L3-L4 (n = 6) open minimal laminotomy. In 16 patients, rather than a herniated disc they had a lumbar epidural varix, while an arterio-venous fistula was found in the remaining five cases. In all cases, the vascular disorder was resected and its subjacent disc was left intact. One patient had a postoperative blood transfusion. While the radiculopathy dysfunction improved in all patients, four patients reported lasting lumbar pain following surgery. The postoperative imaging confirmed the resolution of the vascular anomaly and an intact disc. The mean length of the follow-up period was 47 months. Either epidural varix or arterio-venous fistula in the lumbar area may mimic a herniated disc on imaging studies. With the usual technique they can be operated safely. Resection of the anomaly can be sufficient for alleviating radiculopathy symptoms.

Cervical intraosseous arteriovenous malformation: report of a rare entity and its management dilemmas.

Intraosseous occurrence of a spinal AVM is anecdotal, with only four such cases reported previously. This is the first report of a spinal intraosseous AVM in the cervical vertebrae. A 44-year-old male patient presented with a 2-month history of progressive quadriparesis and bladder dysfunction. Magnetic resonance imaging showed multiple flow voids within the C4 and C5 vertebral bodies, and an extradural component causing cord compression. CT showed extensive bony destruction at both levels. The diagnosis of an intraosseous AVM was confirmed with spinal angiography. The AVM was noted to be fed by branches from the ascending cervical arteries and the vertebral artery. The nidus was draining into the vertebral venous plexus and thence into the jugular vein through the marginal sinus. The patient underwent partial embolization of the AVM. Surgical resection was attempted but found to be unfeasible due to torrential bleeding. A 360-degree stabilization along with decompressive laminectomies was performed, resulting in clinical improvement and disease stabilization at one year follow-up. The case and its management dilemmas are discussed in light of a brief literature review.

Prospective comparative analysis of three types of decompressive surgery for lumbar central stenosis: conventional, full-endoscopic, and biportal endoscopic laminectomy.

Conventional open laminectomy has long been considered one of the important surgical options for lumbar central stenosis owing to its positive outcomes. However, newer approaches have emerged as alternatives, including full-endoscopic and biportal endoscopic laminectomy. Therefore, a comparison of the outcomes that are associated with each of these surgical methods is warranted. This prospective multicenter trial, initiated in February 2019, compared the outcomes of three lumbar central stenosis surgical approaches: open laminectomy (OPEN), uniportal endoscopy (UNIPORT), and biportal endoscopy (BIPORT). Among 115 participants from seven centers, one-year follow-ups assessed laboratory, radiological, and clinical outcomes. Despite all groups showing adequate decompression and clinical improvement, the OPEN group exhibited less improvement in Visual analog scale (VAS) for back pain scores (p < 0.05) and significant postoperative increases in most laboratory markers. Furthermore, the OPEN group experienced a significant decrease in multifidus muscle cross-sectional area compared to endoscopic groups (p < 0.001). Each surgical techniques produced similar clinical outcomes and dural space expansion. However, endoscopic surgery was associated with better muscle preservation and better relief of back pain. Endoscopic surgery is a reasonable alternative to conventional laminectomy for treating lumbar central stenosis.This trial was registered on CRIS (Clinical Research Information Service, KCT0004355).

Percutaneous lumbopelvic fixation is effective in the management of unstable transverse sacral fractures.

OBJECTIVES: Historically, fractures causing lumbopelvic dissociation have been managed with open lumbosacral fusion and instrumentation. Our aim was to evaluate outcomes and complications following surgical management of unstable transverse sacral fractures with percutaneous lumbopelvic fixation. METHODS: Design: Retrospective case series. SETTING: Academic Single Center, Level I Trauma Center. Patient Selection Criteria: Patients with lumbopelvic dissociation undergoing surgery. Outcome Measures and Comparisons: Patient demographics, mechanism of injury, ISS, associated injuries, radiographic classification (Roy-Camille), patient-reported outcomes (PROMIS PI, PF, D, and ODI), and complications were collected. RESULTS: 27 patients were enrolled with an average follow-up of 18.7 ± 17.6 months and age of 54.4 ± 25.1 years. All patients underwent lumbar pedicle screw and iliac screw placement. Sacral laminectomy was performed if the patient had a preoperative neurological deficit. Patients were counseled on instrumentation removal at 6-12 months. 67 % of patients sustained a fall, and 33 % were involved in an MVA. 52 % were Roy-Camille Type 2, and 32 % and 20 % were Types 1 and 3, respectively. The mean EBL was 261 ± 400 ml. 37 % required concurrent sacral laminectomy. There were no intraoperative complications and four postoperative complications, including surgical site infection, rod dislodgment, and deep venous thrombosis. 63 % underwent removal of instrumentation after fracture healing. ODI scores significantly improved from 6 weeks post-op (35.5 ± 4.5) to one-year follow-up (18.3 ± 9.6, p = 0.005), two-year follow-up (20.3 ± 10.0, p = 0.03), and final follow-up (16.4 ± 8.8, p = 0.002). Statistically significant improvements were observed in the PROMIS PI, PF, and D domains (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that lumbopelvic instrumentation leads to successful management of unstable transverse sacral fractures, with improvement in PRO. The combination of percutaneous instrumentation without arthrodesis did not result in any fracture non-union. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

[Early effects of unilateral biportal endoscopic posterior total laminectomy decompression in the treatment of cervical stenosis].

To investigate the early efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopic posterior total laminectomy decompression in the treatment of cervical stenosis (CS). The clinical data of 28 patients with CS treated by unilateral biportal endoscopic posterior total laminectomy decompression from January 2021 to October 2022 in the Henan NO.3 Provincial People's Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Of the patients, 16 were male and 12 were female, the mean age was (55.6±9.6) years. The CS occurred at C3-4 level in 1 cases, at C4-5 level in 3 cases, at C5-6 level in 16 cases and at C6-7 level in 8 cases. Each case was compared at the moment of pre-operation and final follow-up by the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score. The postoperative complications were recorded. The JOA improvement rate was computed at the final follow-up. As a result, all patients underwent successful surgery and were followed up for (11.6±4.7) months. The operation time was (43.0±5.3) min. Intraoperative blood loss (7.9±2.8) ml; Postoperative drainage volume (8.1±2.3) ml. The JOA score increased from 7.9±1.2 before surgery to 13.5±1.3 six months after surgery, and it was 13.7±1.2 at the last follow-up, the differences between postoperative and preoperative were both statistically significant (both P<0.001). No complications occurred, such as cerebrospinal fluid leakage, nerve injury and intraspinal hematoma. At the last follow-up, cervical spine X-ray or CT evaluation showed no instability in the operative segment. The overall curative effect was evaluated according to JOA score at the last follow-up: 16 cases got excellent outcome, 7 cases got good and 2 cases got medium outcome, with an excellent and good rate of 89.3% (25/28). This study shows that unilateral biportal endoscopic posterior total laminectomy decompression in the treatment of single-level cervical stenosis can achieve satisfactory efficacy, has no impact on spinal stability, and has a high safety.

Comparison of microscopic full-laminectomy (open surgery) and microendoscopic minimally invasive hemilaminectomy for thoracic extramedullary spinal tumours.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive treatments for spinal cord tumours are common. The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes of patients with thoracic extramedullary spinal tumours (TEST) treated by microendoscopic minimally invasive surgery-hemilaminectomy through a homemade tubular retractor (MIS-TR) and microscopic full laminectomy (open surgery). METHODS: Between February 2016 and February 2021, 51 patients with TEST were included. According to their clinical data, patients were classified into the MIS-TR group (n = 30) and the open surgery group (n = 21) and assessed. RESULTS: In both groups, the mean operation time, change in perioperative ASIA score, and modified Macnab score were comparable. The average postoperative hospital stay in the MIS-TR group was substantially shorter than that in the open surgery group (p < 0.0001). The mean blood loss volume in the MIS-TR group was substantially lower than that in the open surgery group (p = 0.001). The perioperative complication rate in the MIS-TR group was considerably lower than that in the open surgery group (p < 0.0001). At the 3-month follow-up, there was no substantial difference in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score improvement between the two groups. Nonetheless, at the 12-month follow-up, the average ODI in the MIS-TR group was considerably lower than that in the open surgery group (p = 0.023). The main influencing factors for complete postoperative recovery were preoperative ASIA score (OR 7.848, P = 0.002), surgical complications (OR 0.017, P = 0.008) and age (OR 0.974, P = 0.393). CONCLUSIONS: MIS-TR is safer and more effective than open surgery for treating TEST, but the long-term recovery of MIS-TR is not better than that of open surgery.

Does Minimally Invasive Hemilaminectomy for Intradural Extramedullary Tumor Resection Prevent Postlaminectomy Kyphosis or Lordosis Loss?

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive hemilaminectomy is a safe and effective alternative to open laminectomy for treating intradural extramedullary tumors. There are no reports of postoperative kyphosis after this approach. This study aims to determine whether performing minimally invasive spine surgery hemilaminectomy for intradural extramedullary tumors can prevent the development of postlaminectomy kyphosis (PLK) or lordosis loss. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty-five patients with spinal intradural extramedullary tumors who underwent minimally invasive hemilaminectomy surgery and complete pre and postoperative radiologic imaging were included. The effect of the surgical approach on the spinal sagittal axis was assessed by comparing pre- versus postoperative segmental and local Cobb angles at different spinal levels, considering anatomical localization (cervical, thoracic, lumbar, and transition segments) and functional features (mobile, semi-rigid, and transition segments), as well as the extent of the surgical approach (1, 2, or 3 levels) and follow-up. RESULTS: None of the patients had an increase in thoracic kyphosis nor a loss of cervical or lumbar lordosis greater than or equal to 10° after undergoing the minimally invasive spine surgery hemilaminectomy approach. More than 5° of increase in kyphosis was detected on 7.4% and 11.1%, for the segmental and the local angles, respectively; meanwhile, for patients with loss of lordosis, this deviation was detected in 5.3%, for both angles. The occurrence of PLK was more common than that of lordosis loss, but mainly manifested in postoperative angle impairment of less than 5°. No significant differences were evidenced, considering the approach length. CONCLUSIONS: Hemilaminectomy represents a promising approach for preventing PLK and postlaminectomy lordosis loss following intradural extramedullary tumor resection.

Symptomatic spinal metastasis of a supratentorial glioblastoma in a pediatric patient: a case report and comprehensive review of the literature.

Spinal metastasis of Glioblastoma is a rare occurrence, especially in pediatric patients, and extremely rare to become symptomatic. The pathology is poorly understood and remains with unclear dissemination mechanisms. The treatment approaches are varied and multimodal therapy (surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy) can be employed to manage this type of metastasis. We report a case of a 17-year-old female who underwent a gross-total resection of a right frontal glioblastoma and had adjuvant therapy with chemo- and radiotherapy. In the sixth month of follow-up, the patient presented a paraparesis, and a distant recurrence at T7-T8 was detected. The patient was treated with gross-total resection of the tumor through a laminectomy. The histopathological results were consistent with an isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wildtype GBM metastasis. The patient was treated with multimodal therapy, including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. A complementary comprehensive review of current available literature on this topic is also presented.

Comparison of endoscopic decompression to open laminectomy in patients with thoracic ossified ligamentum flavum - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

In recent years, there has been growing interest in an alternative approach for treating TOLF, such as endoscopic decompression, which minimizes the disruption of surrounding tissues. It is important to understand the advantages, disadvantages, and potential differences in outcomes associated with each approach. This comparative study aims to evaluate and contrast the effectiveness, safety, and outcomes of these two surgical techniques, open laminectomy and endoscopic decompression, in the management of thoracic OLF. The literature review was conducted on Embase, PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar databases. After a thorough screening of all search results, 14 studies were shortlisted, from which data was extracted, and statistical analysis was done. Pooled analysis was done to ascertain the intra-operative and post-operative outcomes after surgery for TOLF. Overall, 351 patients were included in the study for evaluation. 174 patients were operated on by open laminectomy, and 177 patients were seen in the endoscopy group. Decreased operative time was seen in the endoscopic subgroup. The mean length of hospital stay of 6.6 days. Both groups showed improvement in mJOA and VAS score. The recovery rate for the reported study cohort was 66.8%, with the Endoscopic surgical approach showing a positive correlation with the mean recovery rate. The dural tear was the most common complication, with a rate of 6.6%. The mean estimated infection rate was 2.7% and postoperative CSF leak was 3.7%, with a trend of significantly higher rates in the open subgroup. Both of the groups showed improvement in functional scores, VAS scores, and cross-sectional area. However, the Endoscopic decompression group experienced reduced hospital stays, operating times, and intraoperative blood loss. The most frequent side effects were CSF leak and dural tear. A few cases showed revision and infection. None of the problems differed between the groups.

Comparative effects of different posterior decompression techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA). OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of different posterior decompression techniques for LSS. Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is one of the most common degenerative spinal diseases that result in claudication, back and leg pain, and disability. Currently, posterior decompression techniques are widely used as an effective treatment for LSS. METHODS: An electronic literature search was performed using the EMBASE, Web of Science, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases. Two authors independently performed data extraction and quality assessment. A Bayesian random effects model was constructed to incorporate the estimates of direct and indirect treatment comparisons and rank the interventions in order. RESULTS: In all, 14 eligible studies comprising 1,260 patients with LSS were included. Five interventions were identified, namely, spinal processes osteotomy (SPO), conventional laminotomy/laminectomy (CL), unilateral laminotomy/laminectomy (UL), bilateral laminotomy/ laminectomy (BL), and spinous process-splitting laminotomy/laminectomy (SPSL). Among these, SPO was the most promising surgical option for decreasing back and leg pain and for lowering the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). SSPL had the shortest operation time, while SPSL was associated with maximum blood loss. SPO and UL were superior to other posterior decompression techniques concerning lesser blood loss and shorter length of hospital stay, respectively. Patients who underwent BL had the lowest postoperative complication rates. CONCLUSION: Overall, SPO was found to be a good surgical choice for patients with LSS.

Outcomes and adverse events for spinal synovial cysts surgical treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Spinal synovial cysts (SSCs) are a rare cause of nerve root and spinal cord compression. Surgical excision of SSCs remains the mainstay of treatment in the presence of unremitting symptoms or neurological deficits, but the choice of the surgical approach remains controversial. The goal of this study was to compare clinical outcomes and adverse events associated with traditional approaches (interlaminar or laminectomy/hemilaminectomy) and minimally invasive approaches (microsurgical tubular approaches or endoscopic approaches) for SSCs. METHODS: Studies reporting surgical management of SSCs were searched in three online databases (PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science). This meta-analysis was reported following the PRISMA Statement. It was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42021288992). The Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias in Nonrandomised Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) was used to evaluate bias. Extracted research data were statistically analyzed using Stata 16 and SPSS statistics 25. RESULTS: A total of 22 related relevant studies were included. Meta-analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in dural tear, residual cyst, recurrence, reoperation, and operation time between minimally invasive approaches and traditional approaches (p > 0.05), but minimally invasive approaches had a good functional improvement (p = 0.004). Postoperative length of hospital stays and intraoperative bleeding in traditional approaches were also higher than in minimally invasive approaches (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Based on the available evidence, minimally invasive approaches may be better than traditional approaches in the treatment of SSCs. Minimally invasive approaches had the advantages of improving clinical satisfaction, with a similar complication rate to traditional approaches. Moreover, endoscopic and microsurgical tubular approaches had similar outcomes.