Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 4.040
Filter
1.
BMC Oral Health ; 24(1): 881, 2024 Aug 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39095752

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hyposalivation is treated using oral cholinergic drugs; however, systemic side effects occasionally lead to discontinuation of treatment. We aimed to investigate the effects of transdermal pilocarpine on the salivary gland skin on saliva secretion and safety in rats. METHODS: Pilocarpine was administered to rats orally (0.5 mg/kg) or topically on the salivary gland skin (5 mg/body). Saliva volume, the number of sweat dots, and fecal weight were measured along with pilocarpine concentration in plasma and submandibular gland tissues. RESULTS: Saliva volume significantly increased 0.5 h after oral administration and 0.5, 3, and 12 h after topical administration. Fecal weight and sweat dots increased significantly 1 h after oral administration; however, no changes were observed after topical application. The pilocarpine concentration in the submandibular gland tissues of the topical group was higher than that in the oral group at 0.5, 3, and 12 h of administration. CONCLUSIONS: Pilocarpine application to salivary gland skin persistently increased salivary volume in rats without inducing sweating or diarrhea. Transdermal pilocarpine applied to the skin over the salivary glands may be an effective and safe treatment option for hyposalivation.


Subject(s)
Administration, Cutaneous , Pilocarpine , Salivary Glands , Salivation , Xerostomia , Pilocarpine/administration & dosage , Pilocarpine/pharmacology , Animals , Salivation/drug effects , Rats , Male , Salivary Glands/drug effects , Salivary Glands/metabolism , Xerostomia/chemically induced , Xerostomia/drug therapy , Muscarinic Agonists/administration & dosage , Muscarinic Agonists/pharmacology , Saliva/metabolism , Saliva/chemistry , Administration, Oral , Submandibular Gland/drug effects , Submandibular Gland/metabolism , Rats, Sprague-Dawley
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38950842

ABSTRACT

Acute stimulation of M1 or M4 muscarinic cholinergic receptors reduces cocaine abuse-related effects in mice and rats. The combined activation of these receptor subtypes produces synergistic effects on some behavioural endpoints in mice. M1 and M1 + M4 receptor stimulation in a cocaine vs. food choice assay in rats and microdialysis in rats showed delayed and lasting "anticocaine effects". Here, we tested whether these putative lasting neuroplastic changes are sufficient to occlude the reinforcing effects of cocaine at the behavioural level in mice. Mice were pre-treated with the M1 receptor partial agonist VU0364572, M4 receptor positive allosteric modulator VU0152100, or VU0364572 + VU0152100 two weeks prior to acquisition of cocaine intravenous self-administration (IVSA). Male C57BL/6JRj mice received vehicle, VU0364572, VU0152100, or VU0364572 + VU0152100. Female mice were tested with two VU0364572 + VU0152100 dose combinations or vehicle. To attribute potential effects to either reduced rewarding effects or increased aversion to cocaine, we tested VU0364572 alone and VU0364572 + VU0152100 in acquisition of cocaine-conditioned place preference (CPP) in male mice using an unbiased design. The acquisition of cocaine IVSA was drastically reduced and/or slowed in male and female mice receiving VU0364572 + VU0152100, but not either drug alone. Food-maintained operant behaviour was unaffected, indicating that the treatment effects were cocaine-specific. No treatment altered the acquisition of cocaine-CPP, neither in the post-test, nor in a challenge 14 days later. The cocaine IVSA findings confirm unusual long-lasting "anticocaine" effects of muscarinic M1 + M4 receptor stimulation. Thus, in mice, simultaneous stimulation of both receptor subtypes seems to produce potential neuroplastic changes that yield lasting effects.


Subject(s)
Cocaine , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Receptor, Muscarinic M1 , Receptor, Muscarinic M4 , Reinforcement, Psychology , Self Administration , Animals , Male , Cocaine/pharmacology , Cocaine/administration & dosage , Female , Receptor, Muscarinic M4/metabolism , Receptor, Muscarinic M1/agonists , Receptor, Muscarinic M1/metabolism , Receptor, Muscarinic M1/drug effects , Mice , Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors/pharmacology , Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Muscarinic Agonists/pharmacology , Conditioning, Operant/drug effects
3.
Neuropharmacology ; 258: 110092, 2024 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39067666

ABSTRACT

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) are G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that are activated by the endogenous neurotransmitter, acetylcholine (ACh). Disruption of mAChR signalling has been associated with a variety of neurological disorders and non-neurological diseases. Consequently, the development of agonists and antagonists of the mAChRs has been a major avenue in drug discovery. Unfortunately, mAChR ligands are often associated with on-target side effects for two reasons. The first reason is due to the high sequence conservation at the orthosteric ACh binding site among all five receptor subtypes (M1-M5), making on-target subtype selectivity a major challenge. The second reason is due to on-target side effects of mAChR drugs that are associated with the pleiotropic nature of mAChR signalling at the level of a single mAChR subtype. Indeed, there is growing evidence that within the myriad of signalling events produced by mAChR ligands, some will have therapeutic benefits, whilst others may promote cholinergic side effects. This paradigm of drug action, known as ligand bias or biased agonism, is an attractive feature for next-generation mAChR drugs, as it holds the promise of developing drugs devoid of on-target adverse effects. Although relatively simple to detect and even quantify in vitro, ligand bias, as observed in recombinant systems, does not always translate to in vivo systems, which remains a major hurdle in GPCR drug discovery, including the mAChR family. Here we report recent studies that have attempted to detect and quantify ligand bias at the mAChR family, and briefly discuss the challenges associated with biased agonist drug development. This article is part of the Special Issue on "Ligand Bias".


Subject(s)
Receptors, Muscarinic , Humans , Animals , Ligands , Receptors, Muscarinic/metabolism , Muscarinic Agonists/pharmacology , Muscarinic Antagonists/pharmacology , Drug Discovery/methods , Acetylcholine/metabolism
4.
Hippocampus ; 34(9): 464-490, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38949057

ABSTRACT

Olfactory oscillations may enhance cognitive processing through coupling with beta (ß, 15-30 Hz) and gamma (γ, 30-160 Hz) activity in the hippocampus (HPC). We hypothesize that coupling between olfactory bulb (OB) and HPC oscillations is increased by cholinergic activation in control rats and is reduced in kainic-acid-treated epileptic rats, a model of temporal lobe epilepsy. OB γ2 (63-100 Hz) power was higher during walking and immobility-awake (IMM) compared to sleep, while γ1 (30-57 Hz) power was higher during grooming than other behavioral states. Muscarinic cholinergic agonist pilocarpine (25 mg/kg ip) with peripheral muscarinic blockade increased OB power and OB-HPC coherence at ß and γ1 frequency bands. A similar effect was found after physostigmine (0.5 mg/kg ip) but not scopolamine (10 mg/kg ip). Pilocarpine increased bicoherence and cross-frequency coherence (CFC) between OB slow waves (SW, 1-5 Hz) and hippocampal ß, γ1 and γ2 waves, with stronger coherence at CA1 alveus and CA3c than CA1 stratum radiatum. Bicoherence further revealed a nonlinear interaction of ß waves in OB with ß waves at the CA1-alveus. Beta and γ1 waves in OB or HPC were segregated at one phase of the OB-SW, opposite to the phase of γ2 and γ3 (100-160 Hz) waves, suggesting independent temporal processing of ß/γ1 versus γ2/γ3 waves. At CA1 radiatum, kainic-acid-treated epileptic rats compared to control rats showed decreased theta power, theta-ß and theta-γ2 CFC during baseline walking, decreased CFC of HPC SW with γ2 and γ3 waves during baseline IMM, and decreased coupling of OB SW with ß and γ2 waves at CA1 alveus after pilocarpine. It is concluded that ß and γ waves in the OB and HPC are modulated by a slow respiratory rhythm, in a cholinergic and behavior-dependent manner, and OB-HPC functional connectivity at ß and γ frequencies may enhance cognitive functions.


Subject(s)
Beta Rhythm , Gamma Rhythm , Hippocampus , Olfactory Bulb , Pilocarpine , Animals , Gamma Rhythm/drug effects , Gamma Rhythm/physiology , Male , Olfactory Bulb/drug effects , Olfactory Bulb/physiopathology , Olfactory Bulb/physiology , Hippocampus/drug effects , Hippocampus/physiopathology , Hippocampus/physiology , Rats , Pilocarpine/pharmacology , Beta Rhythm/drug effects , Beta Rhythm/physiology , Kainic Acid/pharmacology , Muscarinic Agonists/pharmacology , Disease Models, Animal , Epilepsy, Temporal Lobe/physiopathology , Epilepsy, Temporal Lobe/chemically induced , Scopolamine/pharmacology , Physostigmine/pharmacology , Behavior, Animal/drug effects , Behavior, Animal/physiology , Muscarinic Antagonists/pharmacology
5.
Int J Pharm ; 662: 124497, 2024 Sep 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39033941

ABSTRACT

The development of an effective transdermal drug delivery protocol to eccrine sweat glands is important for the advancement of research on the human sweating response. We investigated whether microneedle treatment prior to the application of pilocarpine, a hydrophilic and sudorific agent that does not induce sweating due to a limited percutaneous passive diffusion by skin application alone, augments sweat production. We applied three microneedle arrays to forearm skin sites simultaneously (n = 20). Upon removal of the microneedles, 1 % pilocarpine was applied to each site for 5-, 15-, and 30-min for the assessment of sweat gland function. In parallel, pilocarpine was administered by transdermal iontophoresis (5-min) at a separate site. Sweat rate was assessed continuously via the ventilated capsule technique. Pilocarpine augmented sweat rate at the 15- and 30-min periods as compared to the application at 5-min. The sweating responses induced by the 15- and 30-min application of pilocarpine were equivalent to âˆ¼ 80 % of that measured at the iontophoretically treated sites. Notably, we observed a correlation in sweat rate between these two transdermal drug delivery methods. Altogether, our findings show that pre-treatment of microneedle arrays can enhance transdermal delivery efficiency of pilocarpine to human eccrine sweat glands.


Subject(s)
Administration, Cutaneous , Iontophoresis , Needles , Pilocarpine , Sweating , Pilocarpine/administration & dosage , Humans , Sweating/drug effects , Male , Adult , Iontophoresis/methods , Female , Young Adult , Drug Delivery Systems/instrumentation , Muscarinic Agonists/administration & dosage , Sweat , Skin/metabolism
6.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 14901, 2024 06 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38942828

ABSTRACT

Allosteric modulation of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChR) has been identified as a potential strategy for regulating cholinergic signaling in the treatment of various neurological disorders. Most positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) of mAChR enhance agonist affinity and potency, while very few PAMs (e.g., amiodarone) selectively enhance G protein coupling efficacy. The key structural features of amiodarone responsible for enhancement of mAChR efficacy were examined in CHO cells expressing M1 receptors. Subsequent incorporation of these structural features into previously identified allosteric modulators of potency (i.e., n-benzyl isatins) generated ligands that demonstrated similar or better enhancement of mAChR efficacy, lower in vivo toxicity, and higher allosteric binding affinity relative to amiodarone. Notable ligands include 8a, c which respectively demonstrated the strongest binding affinity and the most robust enhancement of mAChR efficacy as calculated from an allosteric operational model. Amiodarone derivatives and hybrid ligands were additionally screened in wildtype zebrafish (Danio rerio) to provide preliminary in vivo toxicity data as well as to observe effects on locomotor and turning behaviors relative to other mAChR PAMs. Several compounds, including 8a, c, reduced locomotor activity and increased measures of turning behaviors in zebrafish, suggesting that allosteric modulation of muscarinic receptor efficacy might be useful in the treatment of repetitive behaviors associated with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and other neuropsychiatric disorders.


Subject(s)
Acetylcholine , Cricetulus , Locomotion , Receptor, Muscarinic M1 , Zebrafish , Animals , Receptor, Muscarinic M1/metabolism , Allosteric Regulation/drug effects , CHO Cells , Acetylcholine/metabolism , Acetylcholine/pharmacology , Locomotion/drug effects , Ligands , Muscarinic Agonists/pharmacology
7.
J Med Chem ; 67(13): 10831-10847, 2024 Jul 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38888621

ABSTRACT

Selective activation of the M4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor subtype offers a novel strategy for the treatment of psychosis in multiple neurological disorders. Although the development of traditional muscarinic activators has been stymied due to pan-receptor activation, muscarinic receptor subtype selectivity can be achieved through the utilization of a subtype of a unique allosteric site. A major challenge in capitalizing on this allosteric site to date has been achieving a balance of suitable potency and brain penetration. Herein, we describe the design of a brain penetrant series of M4 selective positive allosteric modulators (PAMs), ultimately culminating in the identification of 21 (PF-06852231, now CVL-231/emraclidine), which is under active clinical development as a novel mechanism and approach for the treatment of schizophrenia.


Subject(s)
Brain , Drug Design , Receptor, Muscarinic M4 , Receptor, Muscarinic M4/metabolism , Receptor, Muscarinic M4/agonists , Allosteric Regulation/drug effects , Humans , Animals , Brain/metabolism , Brain/drug effects , Structure-Activity Relationship , Rats , Cricetulus , CHO Cells , Muscarinic Agonists/pharmacology , Muscarinic Agonists/chemical synthesis , Muscarinic Agonists/chemistry , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Schizophrenia/metabolism
8.
J Pharm Sci ; 113(9): 2861-2870, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38857643

ABSTRACT

Exploiting a convenient and highly bioavailable ocular drug delivery approach is currently one of the hotspots in the pharmaceutical industry. Eyelid topical application is seen to be a valuable strategy in the treatment of chronic ocular diseases. To further elucidate the feasibility of eyelid topical administration as an alternative route for ocular drug delivery, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies of pilocarpine were conducted in rabbits. Besides, a novel physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model describing eyelid transdermal absorption and ocular disposition was developed in rabbits. The PBPK model of rabbits was extrapolated to human by integrating the drug-specific permeability parameters and human physiological parameters to predict ocular pharmacokinetic in human. After eyelid topical application of pilocarpine, the concentration of pilocarpine in iris peaked at 2 h with the value of 18,724 ng/g and the concentration in aqueous humor peaked at 1 h with the value of 1,363 ng/mL. Significant miotic effect were observed from 0.5 h to 4.5 h after eyelid topical application of pilocarpine in rabbits, while that were observed from 0.5 h to 3.5 h after eyedrop instillation. The proposed eyelid PBPK model was capable of reasonably predicting ocular exposure of pilocarpine after application on the eyelid skin and based on the PBPK model, the human ocular concentration was predicted to be 10-fold lower than that in rabbits. And it was suggested that drugs applied on the eyelid skin could transfer into the eyeball through corneal pathway and scleral pathway. This work could provide pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data for the development of eyelid drug delivery, as well as the reference for clinical applications.


Subject(s)
Eyelids , Models, Biological , Pilocarpine , Pilocarpine/pharmacokinetics , Pilocarpine/administration & dosage , Animals , Rabbits , Humans , Eyelids/metabolism , Eyelids/drug effects , Administration, Topical , Male , Miotics/pharmacokinetics , Miotics/administration & dosage , Muscarinic Agonists/pharmacokinetics , Muscarinic Agonists/administration & dosage , Aqueous Humor/metabolism , Aqueous Humor/drug effects , Administration, Ophthalmic , Skin Absorption/drug effects , Ophthalmic Solutions/pharmacokinetics , Ophthalmic Solutions/administration & dosage , Drug Delivery Systems/methods
9.
Clin Drug Investig ; 44(7): 471-493, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38904739

ABSTRACT

Standard schizophrenia treatment involves antipsychotic medications that target D2 dopamine receptors. However, these drugs have limitations in addressing all symptoms and can lead to adverse effects such as motor impairments, metabolic effects, sedation, sexual dysfunction, cognitive impairment, and tardive dyskinesia. Recently, KarXT has emerged as a novel drug for schizophrenia. KarXT combines xanomeline, a muscarinic receptor M1 and M4 agonist, with trospium, a nonselective antimuscarinic agent. Of note, xanomeline can readily cross blood-brain barrier (BBB) and, thus, enter into the brain, thereby stimulating muscarinic receptors (M1 and M4). By doing so, xanomeline has been shown to target negative symptoms and potentially improve positive symptoms. Trospium, on the other hand, is not able to cross BBB, thereby not affecting M1 and M4 receptors; instead, it acts as an antimuscarinic agent and, hence, diminishes peripheral activity of muscarinic receptors to minimize side effects probably stemming from xanomeline in other organs. Accordingly, ongoing clinical trials investigating KarXT's efficacy in schizophrenia have demonstrated positive outcomes, including significant improvements in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score and cognitive function compared with placebo. These findings emphasize the potential of KarXT as a promising treatment for schizophrenia, providing symptom relief while minimizing side effects associated with xanomeline monotherapy. Despite such promising evidence, further research is needed to confirm the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of KarXT in managing schizophrenia. This review article explores the current findings and potential mechanisms of KarXT in the treatment of schizophrenia.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Schizophrenia , Humans , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Muscarinic Antagonists/therapeutic use , Muscarinic Antagonists/adverse effects , Pyridines/therapeutic use , Pyridines/adverse effects , Pyridines/pharmacology , Benzilates/therapeutic use , Benzilates/adverse effects , Drug Combinations , Animals , Muscarinic Agonists/therapeutic use , Muscarinic Agonists/adverse effects , Thiadiazoles/therapeutic use , Thiadiazoles/adverse effects , Thiadiazoles/pharmacology
10.
Mol Cell Neurosci ; 129: 103935, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38703973

ABSTRACT

Muscarinic neurotransmission is fundamentally involved in supporting several brain functions by modulating flow of information in brain neural circuits including the hippocampus which displays a remarkable functional segregation along its longitudinal axis. However, how muscarinic neuromodulation contributes to the functional segregation along the hippocampus remains unclear. In this study we show that the nonselective muscarinic receptor agonist carbachol similarly suppresses basal synaptic transmission in the dorsal and ventral CA1 hippocampal field, in a concentration-depended manner. Furthermore, using a ten-pulse stimulation train of varying frequency we found that carbachol changes the frequency filtering properties more in ventral than dorsal hippocampus by facilitating synaptic inputs at a wide range of input frequencies in the ventral compared with dorsal hippocampus. Using the M2 receptor antagonist gallamine and the M4 receptor antagonist tropicamide, we found that M2 receptors are involved in controlling basal synaptic transmission and short-term synaptic plasticity (STSP) in the ventral but not the dorsal hippocampus, while M4 receptors participate in modulating basal synaptic transmission and STSP in both segments of the hippocampus. These results were corroborated by the higher protein expression levels of M2 receptors in the ventral compared with dorsal hippocampus. We conclude that muscarinic transmission modulates excitatory synaptic transmission and short-term synaptic plasticity along the entire rat hippocampus by acting through M4 receptors and recruiting M2 receptors only in the ventral hippocampus. Furthermore, M4 receptors appear to exert a permissive role on the actions of M2 receptors on STSP in the ventral hippocampus. This dorsoventral differentiation of muscarinic modulation is expected to have important implications in information processing along the endogenous hippocampal circuitry.


Subject(s)
Hippocampus , Neuronal Plasticity , Synaptic Transmission , Animals , Neuronal Plasticity/physiology , Neuronal Plasticity/drug effects , Synaptic Transmission/physiology , Synaptic Transmission/drug effects , Rats , Hippocampus/metabolism , Hippocampus/drug effects , Hippocampus/physiology , Male , Carbachol/pharmacology , Receptor, Muscarinic M2/metabolism , Receptors, Muscarinic/metabolism , Rats, Wistar , Muscarinic Antagonists/pharmacology , Receptor, Muscarinic M4/metabolism , Muscarinic Agonists/pharmacology , Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials/physiology , Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials/drug effects
11.
Physiol Res ; 73(Suppl 1): S389-S400, 2024 04 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38634650

ABSTRACT

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors are metabotropic G-protein coupled receptors. Muscarinic receptors in the cardiovascular system play a central role in its regulation. Particularly M2 receptors slow down the heart rate by reducing the impulse conductivity through the atrioventricular node. In general, activation of muscarinic receptors has sedative effects on the cardiovascular system, including vasodilation, negative chronotropic and inotropic effects on the heart, and cardioprotective effects, including antifibrillatory effects. First, we review the signaling of individual subtypes of muscarinic receptors and their involvement in the physiology and pathology of the cardiovascular system. Then we review age and disease-related changes in signaling via muscarinic receptors in the cardiovascular system. Finally, we review molecular mechanisms involved in cardioprotection mediated by muscarinic receptors leading to negative chronotropic and inotropic and antifibrillatory effects on heart and vasodilation, like activation of acetylcholine-gated inward-rectifier K+-currents and endothelium-dependent and -independent vasodilation. We relate this knowledge with well-established cardioprotective treatments by vagal stimulation and muscarinic agonists. It is well known that estrogen exerts cardioprotective effects against atherosclerosis and ischemia-reperfusion injury. Recently, some sex hormones and neurosteroids have been shown to allosterically modulate muscarinic receptors. Thus, we outline possible treatment by steroid-based positive allosteric modulators of acetylcholine as a novel pharmacotherapeutic tactic. Keywords: Muscarinic receptors, Muscarinic agonists, Allosteric modulation, Cardiovascular system, Cardioprotection, Steroids.


Subject(s)
Receptors, Muscarinic , Humans , Receptors, Muscarinic/metabolism , Animals , Cardiotonic Agents/pharmacology , Cardiotonic Agents/therapeutic use , Vasodilation/physiology , Vasodilation/drug effects , Muscarinic Agonists/pharmacology
12.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 281(7): 3727-3733, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38573515

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study aims to investigate the efficacy of lower dose pilocarpine in alleviating late dry mouth symptoms in head and neck cancer patients received radiotherapy. METHODS: Eighteen head and neck cancer patients experiencing persistent dry mouth were enrolled in this study. All participants started pilocarpine treatment a median of 6 months post-radiotherapy. Initially, patients received pilocarpine at 5 mg/day, with a gradual increase to the recommended dose of 15 mg/day. A Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement (PROMs) questionnaire assessed symptoms' severity related to hyposalivation. RESULTS: All patients reported symptomatic dry mouth above grade 2 before starting the medication. Pilocarpine treatment continued based on patients' self-assessment, with a median duration of 12 months (range, 3-36 months). The median daily maintenance dose was 10 mg (range, 5 to 20 mg). Total PROMs scores significantly decreased following medication, from 13 points (range 7-18 points) to 7 points (range 4-13 points) (p = 0.001). Significant improvements were observed in questions related to dry mouth (p < 0.001), water intake during eating (p = 0.01), carrying water (p = 0.01), taste (p < 0.001), and water intake during speech (p < 0.001). Initial and maintenance doses of pilocarpine were lower, and the duration of pilocarpine usage was shorter in patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy compared to conformal radiotherapy (12 months vs. 25 months, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Pilocarpine may be considered at doses lower for late-term dry mouth. With modern radiotherapy techniques effectively preserving the parotid gland, short-term use may be recommended in these patients. Future studies may enhance the development of a more robust patient selection criteria model.


Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms , Muscarinic Agonists , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Pilocarpine , Radiation Injuries , Xerostomia , Humans , Xerostomia/etiology , Pilocarpine/administration & dosage , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Aged , Muscarinic Agonists/therapeutic use , Muscarinic Agonists/administration & dosage , Adult , Treatment Outcome
13.
Br J Pharmacol ; 181(17): 3064-3081, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38689378

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Current pharmacotherapies for Tourette syndrome (TS) are often unsatisfactory and poorly tolerated, underscoring the need for novel treatments. Insufficient striatal acetylcholine has been suggested to contribute to tic ontogeny. Thus, we tested whether activating M1 and/or M4 receptors-the two most abundant muscarinic receptors in the striatum-reduced tic-related behaviours in mouse models of TS. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Studies were conducted using CIN-d and D1CT-7 mice, two TS models characterized by early-life depletion of striatal cholinergic interneurons and cortical neuropotentiation, respectively. First, we tested the effects of systemic and intrastriatal xanomeline, a selective M1/M4 receptor agonist, on tic-like and other TS-related responses. Then, we examined whether xanomeline effects were reduced by either M1 or M4 antagonists or mimicked by the M1/M3 agonist cevimeline or the M4 positive allosteric modulator (PAM) VU0467154. Finally, we measured striatal levels of M1 and M4 receptors and assessed the impact of VU0461754 on the striatal expression of the neural marker activity c-Fos. KEY RESULTS: Systemic and intrastriatal xanomeline reduced TS-related behaviours in CIN-d and D1CT-7 mice. Most effects were blocked by M4, but not M1, receptor antagonists. VU0467154, but not cevimeline, elicited xanomeline-like ameliorative effects in both models. M4, but not M1, receptors were down-regulated in the striatum of CIN-d mice. Additionally, VU0467154 reduced striatal c-Fos levels in these animals. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Activation of striatal M4, but not M1, receptors reduced tic-like manifestations in mouse models, pointing to xanomeline and M4 PAMs as novel putative therapeutic strategies for TS.


Subject(s)
Corpus Striatum , Disease Models, Animal , Muscarinic Agonists , Receptor, Muscarinic M4 , Tourette Syndrome , Animals , Tourette Syndrome/metabolism , Tourette Syndrome/drug therapy , Receptor, Muscarinic M4/metabolism , Receptor, Muscarinic M4/agonists , Receptor, Muscarinic M4/antagonists & inhibitors , Mice , Corpus Striatum/metabolism , Corpus Striatum/drug effects , Male , Muscarinic Agonists/pharmacology , Behavior, Animal/drug effects , Pyridines/pharmacology , Tics/drug therapy , Tics/metabolism , Thiophenes/pharmacology , Receptor, Muscarinic M1/metabolism , Receptor, Muscarinic M1/agonists , Dioxoles/pharmacology , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Thiadiazoles
14.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 9652, 2024 04 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38671143

ABSTRACT

Selective activation of individual subtypes of muscarinic receptors is a promising way to safely alleviate a wide range of pathological conditions in the central nervous system and the periphery as well. The flexible G-protein interface of muscarinic receptors allows them to interact with several G-proteins with various efficacy, potency, and kinetics. Agonists biased to the particular G-protein mediated pathway may result in selectivity among muscarinic subtypes and, due to the non-uniform expression of individual G-protein alpha subunits, possibly achieve tissue specificity. Here, we demonstrate that novel tetrahydropyridine-based agonists exert specific signalling profiles in coupling with individual G-protein α subunits. These signalling profiles profoundly differ from the reference agonist carbachol. Moreover, coupling with individual Gα induced by these novel agonists varies among subtypes of muscarinic receptors which may lead to subtype selectivity. Thus, the novel tetrahydropyridine-based agonist can contribute to the elucidation of the mechanism of pathway-specific activation of muscarinic receptors and serve as a starting point for the development of desired selective muscarinic agonists.


Subject(s)
Muscarinic Agonists , Receptors, Muscarinic , Muscarinic Agonists/pharmacology , Receptors, Muscarinic/metabolism , Animals , Signal Transduction/drug effects , Humans , Pyridines/pharmacology , Carbachol/pharmacology , CHO Cells , Cricetulus , GTP-Binding Proteins/metabolism , GTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits/metabolism , GTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits/genetics
15.
Biol Psychiatry ; 96(8): 627-637, 2024 Oct 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38537670

ABSTRACT

Achieving optimal treatment outcomes for individuals living with schizophrenia remains challenging, despite 70 years of drug development efforts. Many chemically distinct antipsychotics have been developed over the past 7 decades with improved safety and tolerability but with only slight variation in efficacy. All antipsychotics currently approved for the treatment of schizophrenia act as antagonists or partial agonists at the dopamine D2 receptor. With only a few possible exceptions, antipsychotic drugs have similar and modest efficacy for treating positive symptoms and are relatively ineffective in addressing the negative and cognitive symptoms of the disease. The development of novel treatments focused on targeting muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) has been of interest for more than 25 years following reports that treatment with a dual M1/M4-preferring mAChR agonist resulted in antipsychotic-like effects and procognitive properties in individuals living with Alzheimer's disease and schizophrenia; more recent clinical trials have confirmed these findings. In addition, advances in our understanding of the receptor binding and activation properties of xanomeline at specific mAChRs have the potential to inform future drug design targeting mAChRs.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Muscarinic Agonists , Receptors, Muscarinic , Schizophrenia , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Schizophrenia/metabolism , Humans , Antipsychotic Agents/pharmacology , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Receptors, Muscarinic/drug effects , Receptors, Muscarinic/metabolism , Muscarinic Agonists/pharmacology , Muscarinic Agonists/therapeutic use , Animals , Pyridines/pharmacology , Pyridines/therapeutic use , Thiadiazoles
16.
J Oral Biosci ; 66(2): 447-455, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38336259

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Typical agonists of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), including muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs), activate both G-protein and ß-arrestin signaling systems, and are termed balanced agonists. In contrast, biased agonists selectively activate a single pathway, thereby offering therapeutic potential for the specific activation of that pathway. The mAChR agonists carbachol and pilocarpine are known to induce phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase-1/2 (ERK1/2) via G-protein-dependent and -independent pathways, respectively. We investigated the involvement of ß-arrestin and its downstream mechanisms in the ERK1/2 phosphorylation induced by carbachol and pilocarpine in the human salivary ductal cell line, HSY cells. METHODS: HSY cells were stimulated with pilocarpine or carbachol, with or without various inhibitors. The cell lysates were analyzed by western blotting using the antibodies p44/p42MAPK and phosphor-p44/p42MAPK. RESULTS: Western blot analysis revealed that carbachol elicited greater stimulation of ERK1/2 phosphorylation compared to pilocarpine. ERK1/2 phosphorylation was inhibited by atropine and gefitinib, suggesting that mAChR activation induces transactivation of epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFR). Moreover, inhibition of carbachol-mediated ERK1/2 phosphorylation was achieved by GF-109203X (a PKC inhibitor), a ßARK1/GRK2 inhibitor, barbadin (a ß-arrestin inhibitor), pitstop 2 (a clathrin inhibitor), and dynole 34-2 (a dynamin inhibitor). In contrast, pilocarpine-mediated ERK1/2 phosphorylation was only inhibited by barbadin (a ß-arrestin inhibitor) and PP2 (a Src inhibitor). CONCLUSION: Carbachol activates both G-protein and ß-arrestin pathways, whereas pilocarpine exclusively activates the ß-arrestin pathway. Additionally, downstream of ß-arrestin, carbachol activates clathrin-dependent internalization, while pilocarpine activates Src.


Subject(s)
Carbachol , Muscarinic Agonists , Pilocarpine , Receptors, Muscarinic , Signal Transduction , Humans , Phosphorylation/drug effects , Receptors, Muscarinic/metabolism , Pilocarpine/pharmacology , Carbachol/pharmacology , Muscarinic Agonists/pharmacology , Signal Transduction/drug effects , Salivary Ducts/metabolism , beta-Arrestins/metabolism , Cell Line , Extracellular Signal-Regulated MAP Kinases/metabolism , Blotting, Western , Arrestins/metabolism
17.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol ; 80(6): 847-853, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38396308

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) or beta-2 agonists (LABA) have been recommended for symptom control in group A COPD patients as a first-line bronchodilator treatment in GOLD guidelines. However, there is no mention of priority/superiority between the two treatment options. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of these treatments in this group. METHODS: The study cohort was formed of all subjects from six pulmonology clinics with an initial diagnosis of COPD who were new users of a LAMA or LABA from January 2020 to December 2021. Seventy-six group A COPD patients, in whom LABA or LAMA therapy had been started in the last 1 month as a first-line treatment, were included in our study. Participants were evaluated with spirometry, COPD Assessment Test (CAT), mMRC scale, and St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) for three times (baseline, 6-12th months). RESULTS: There were 76 group A COPD patients with LAMA (67.1%) and LABA (32.9%). The number of patients who improved in CAT score at the end of the first year was significantly higher in patients using LAMA than those using LABA (p = 0.022); the improvement at minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in CAT score of LAMA group at 1st year was also significant (p = 0.044). SGRQ total and impact scores were found to be statistically lower at 1st year compared to baseline in patients using LAMA (p = 0.010 and 0.006, respectively). Significant improvement was detected in CAT and SGRQ scores at the 6th month visit in the LAMA group having emphysema (p = 0.032 and 0.002, respectively). CONCLUSION: According to significant improvements in CAT and SGRQ score, LAMA may be preferred over LABA as a bronchodilator agent in group A COPD patients, especially in emphysema-dominant phenotype.


Subject(s)
Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists , Muscarinic Antagonists , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Humans , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/drug therapy , Male , Female , Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists/therapeutic use , Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists/administration & dosage , Muscarinic Antagonists/administration & dosage , Muscarinic Antagonists/therapeutic use , Aged , Middle Aged , Bronchodilator Agents/therapeutic use , Bronchodilator Agents/administration & dosage , Treatment Outcome , Spirometry , Muscarinic Agonists/therapeutic use , Muscarinic Agonists/administration & dosage , Delayed-Action Preparations
18.
Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist ; 23: 130-139, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38043189

ABSTRACT

The physiological significance of metabotropic acetylcholine receptors in parasitic nematodes remains largely unexplored. Here, three different Trichinella spiralis G protein-coupled acetylcholine receptors (TsGAR-1, -2, and -3) were identified in the genome of T. spiralis. The phylogenetic analyses showed that TsGAR-1 and -2 receptors belong to a distinct clade specific to invertebrates, while TsGAR-3 is closest to the cluster of mammalian-type muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChR). The mRNA of TsGAR-1, -2, and -3 was detected in muscle larvae, newborn larvae, and adults. The functional aequorin-based assay in Chinese hamster ovary cells revealed that all three types of T. spiralis GARs trigger the Gq/11 pathway upon activation of the receptor with the acetylcholine ligand. TsGAR-1 and TsGAR-2 showed atypical affinity with classical muscarinic agonists, while TsGAR-3 was sensitive to all muscarinic agonists tested. High concentrations of propiverine antagonist blocked the activities of all three TsGARs, while atropine and scopolamine antagonists effectively inhibited only TsGAR-3. Our data indicate that the distinct pharmacological profile of TsGAR-1 and -2 receptors, as well as the phylogenetic distance between them and their mammalian orthologs, place them as attractive targets for the development of selective anthelmintic drugs interfering with nematodes' cholinergic system.


Subject(s)
Acetylcholine , Trichinella spiralis , Animals , Cricetinae , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Acetylcholine/pharmacology , Muscarinic Agonists/pharmacology , Trichinella spiralis/genetics , CHO Cells , Phylogeny , Cricetulus , Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled , Receptors, Cholinergic/genetics , GTP-Binding Proteins
19.
Expert Opin Investig Drugs ; 32(12): 1113-1121, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37994870

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Successful phase 3 trials of KarXT in people with schizophrenia herald a new era of treating the disorder with drugs that do not target the dopamine D2 receptor. The active component of KarXT is xanomeline, a muscarinic (CHRM) M1 and M4 agonist, making muscarinic receptors a viable target for treating schizophrenia. AREAS COVERED: This review covers the process of taking drugs that activate the muscarinic M1 and M4 receptors from conceptualization to the clinic and details the mechanisms by which activating the CHRM1 and 4 can affect the broad spectrum of symptoms experienced by people with schizophrenia. EXPERT OPINION: Schizophrenia is a syndrome which means drugs that activate muscarinic M1 and M4 receptors, as was the case for antipsychotic drugs acting on the dopamine D2 receptor, will not give optimal outcomes in everyone within the syndrome. Thus, it would be ideal to identify people who are responsive to drugs activating the CHRM1 and 4. Given knowledge of the actions of these receptors, it is possible treatment non-response could be restricted to sub-groups within the syndrome who have deficits in cortical CHRM1 or those with one of the cognitive endophenotypes that may be identifiable by changes in the blood transcriptome.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Schizophrenia , Humans , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Muscarinic Agonists/pharmacology , Muscarinic Agonists/therapeutic use , Receptor, Muscarinic M4/agonists , Receptor, Muscarinic M4/genetics , Receptor, Muscarinic M4/therapeutic use , Antipsychotic Agents/pharmacology , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Receptors, Dopamine D2/therapeutic use , Receptor, Muscarinic M1
20.
Tijdschr Psychiatr ; 65(9): 555-562, 2023.
Article in Dutch | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37947466

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Research suggests that cholinergic muscarinic 1 (M1) and/or muscarinic 4 (M4) receptors may be involved in the pathophysiology of psychotic disorders. Agonistic modulation of these receptors can offer new treatment options. AIM: To provide an overview of current research on the role of cholinergic M1 and M4 receptors in the development and treatment of psychoses, with special attention to the development of new drugs such as xanomeline and emraclidine. METHOD: To obtain an overview, we searched for English-language studies published in PubMed, Embase, and PsycInfo up until June 1, 2023. We examined the role and effects of M1 and/or M4 agonists in schizophrenia. Additionally, we consulted clinical trial registers. RESULTS: Our search strategy resulted in nine published articles on five clinical studies. These studies revealed that reduced presence of M1 receptors, primarily in the frontal cortex, and M4 receptors, primarily in the basal ganglia, are associated with psychoses. M1 and M4 receptors modulate dopaminergic activity in the ventral tegmentum and striatum through various pathways. Several M1 and/or M4 agonists, partial agonists, and positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) have been developed. Drugs exhibiting agonistic activity on M1 and/or M4 receptors, such as xanomeline-trospium (phase 2 and 3 studies) and emraclidine (phase 1b studies), have shown positive effects on cognitive and potentially negative symptoms in patients with schizophrenia. CONCLUSION: M1 and/or M4 receptor agonists show potential as new treatment strategies for individuals with psychotic disorders. Although initial studies with xanomeline-trospium and emraclidine have shown positive results, further research is needed to assess their long-term efficacy, safety, and tolerability before these new medications can be evaluated.


Subject(s)
Psychotic Disorders , Receptor, Muscarinic M1 , Humans , Muscarinic Agonists/pharmacology , Muscarinic Agonists/therapeutic use , Psychotic Disorders/drug therapy , Receptor, Muscarinic M1/agonists , Receptor, Muscarinic M1/metabolism , Receptor, Muscarinic M4/agonists , Receptor, Muscarinic M4/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL