Comparing Totally Tubeless and Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with Standard Techniques.

Traditionally, percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) includes placing a nephrostomy tube and a Double J (DJ) stent to drain the kidney and operative tract following the procedure. However, more recent techniques, such as tubeless or totally tubeless PCNL, eliminate these drainage methods. The objective was to assess the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of performing tubeless or totally tubeless PCNL in comparison to standard PCNL a retrospective analysis was performed on 156 patients who underwent PCNL treatment From September 2022 to September 2023. Of these, 78 patients received traditional nephrostomy PCNL, while 46 patients underwent the tubeless procedure and the remaining 32 received the totally tubeless procedure. The three groups showed no significant differences in preoperative patient characteristics. The operation time, analgesic requirements and hospital stay were lower in the tubeless and totally tubeless PCNL group than in the standard PCNL group (p<0.05). No significant differences were found in the mean stone size, stone-free status or the occurrence of major complications. The overall complications (Grade-1, 2 and 3) rate was 14.2% in the standard PCNL group, 8.7% in the tubeless PCNL and 9.4% in the totally tubeless PCNL group. The tubeless and totally tubeless PCNL techniques have proven to be safe and effective, even for patients with incomplete staghorn stones and a moderate pelvic stone burden. These approaches are associated with reduced pain, lower analgesic needs, shorter operative times, and decreased hospital stays, making them more cost- effective and less likely to result in complications, while also improving patient satisfaction. Further research is essential to validate the safety of these techniques, encouraging urologists to adopt them in clinical practice.

Comparative analysis of retro vs. transperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy for large renal stones.

The objective of this study is to compare the outcomes and complications of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy (RLP and TLP, respectively) in the treatment of large kidney stones. In this retrospective cohort effort, data of all patients who underwent laparoscopic pyelolithotomy for renal pelvic stone (N = 273) in three referral urology hospitals were retrieved. Operation duration, length of hospital stay, postoperative stone-free rate, hemoglobin (Hb) and creatinine (Cr) changes and complications were compared between the two groups before and after propensity score matching. A total of 199 TLP and 74 RLP cases were examined. Stone size was significantly higher in the TLP vs. RLP group (29.8 ± 10.9 vs. 26.5 ± 8.8 mm; P = .022). Length of operation and hospital stay were comparable (P = .672 and P = .396, respectively). Rate of conversion to open surgery, postoperative blood transfusion rate, postoperative urinary leakage, postoperative stone-free rate, Hb drop and Cr change were similar between the two groups (P = .348, 0.190, 0.828, 0.411, 0.780 and 0.134, respectively). Postoperative fever was significantly more prevalent in TLP compared to RLP (21.6% vs. 0.0%, respectively; P < .001). Propensity score matched analyses showed similar results in all aspects; particularly demonstrating higher postoperative fever in TLP compared to RLP (18.9% vs. 0.0%, respectively; P < .001). RLP can be considered as an alternative to TLP; especially owing to a lower chance of postoperative fever.

Is double-J stent mandatory in complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy for adult patients with staghorn renal stones?

BACKGROUND: It is controversial whether double-J (DJ) stent insertion is necessary in tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for patients with staghorn stones. We compared the outcomes of using ureteral catheters and double-J stents in tubeless complete supine PCNL (csPCNL) of staghorn stones. METHODS: In this analytical cross-sectional study, from May 2008 to August 2022, 123 patients who underwent tubeless csPCNL were assessed. Patients were divided into two groups by either tubeless csPCNL with DJ stent (Group I; n = 23) or totally tubeless just with perioperative ureteral stent (Group II; n = 100). Demographic characteristics, stone-related factors, perioperative and postoperative parameters were compared in groups. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable in groups. The operative time in group I was significantly longer than group II (68.26 vs. 55.25 min, P = 0.05). However, the duration of hospitalization in Group I was shorter than the other group (1.81 vs. 2.37 days, P = 0.03). Stone free rate was notably higher in Group I (90.5% vs. 79.8.0%) with no statistically significant difference. No significant differences were found in major complications. Patients in Group II had a significantly shorter time to return to normal life (6.48 vs. 7.91 day; P = 0.043). Multivariable linear regression showed the preoperative creatinine level and stone size can affect the operative time (P = 0.02). In addition, stone number and underlying disease can affect the length of hospital stay (P = 0.007 & 0.030, respectively). CONCLUSION: Although not inserting a double J stent after csPCNL has acceptable results, because of higher residual rate in staghorn stone which cause more incidence of renal colic, longer time of hospital stay and return to normal life, inserting DJ stent is recommended.

The association between novel negative pressure ureteroscopic lithotripsy combined with flexible ureteroscopy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy on stone-free rates: implications for clinical practice and policy.

The correlation between novel negative pressure ureteroscopic lithotripsy (NP-URL) combined with flexible ureteroscopy (FU) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) on stone-free rates (SFR) remains unclear. There is a lack of evidence from Chinese populations regarding the relationship between SFR and NP-URL combined with FU (NP-URL-FU) versus PCNL. We aimed to assess the association between NP-URL-FU and PCNL on SFR. We conducted a cohort study involving 166 participants with 2-4 cm kidney stones. Data on SFR (7 days and 2 months) were collected from all participants. Logistic regression analysis was used to substantiate the research objectives. NP-URL-FU versus PCNL showed an 86% decrease in the 7-day SFR (OR = 0.14, 95% CI 0.07-0.29). The results remained stable even after adjusting for potential confounders. However, no statistically significant association was found between the surgical method and the 2-month SFR. Further exploratory subgroup analyses showed no significant interactions, with all P values > 0.05. Among patients with 2-4 cm kidney stones, NP-URL-FU was associated with a lower risk of incident 7-day SFR than PCNL. However, no statistically significant difference was found in the long-term stone removal rate. Therefore, NP-URL-FU may be a viable alternative surgical option for patients seeking minimally invasive procedures.

Effect of Orem's Management Model on Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Kidney Calculi: A Multicenter Retrospective Trial.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the standard procedure for treating upper urinary tract calculi and complex kidney calculi >2 cm in diameter, though it has a high incidence of postoperative complications. This study aimed to investigate the effect of Orem's management model on patients undergoing PCNL. METHODS: This retrospective study included 465 patients who underwent PCNL from February 2022 to February 2023 from two tertiary hospitals. After excluding 16 patients based on exclusion criteria, 449 patients remained. The observation group (n = 227) received Orem's management model, while the control group (n = 222) underwent conventional surgical management. Primary outcomes included postoperative recovery time and the incidence of postoperative complications, while secondary outcomes such as postoperative pain levels (measured via a numerical rating scale) and self-care ability assessed through the exercise of self-care agency were obtained through medical records and physical examinations. RESULTS: Compared to the control group, the observation group achieved faster outcomes for the first anal exsufflation, first ambulation, and discharge, and a lower incidence of postoperative complications (p < 0.05). Post-management, the observation group had lower numerical rating scale scores and higher exercise of self-care agency scores (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Orem's management model accelerates postoperative recovery, alleviates pain, and reduces postoperative complications in patients undergoing PCNL. Moreover, this model enhances self-care ability, though its effectiveness is limited to patients with non-recurrent renal calculi and normal renal function. Further exploration of its broader application is needed.

Comparison of CROES, Guy's, S.T.O.N.E., and S-ReSC nephrolithometric scoring systems in predicting success and complications in patients undergoing supine mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

In addition to the fact that the significance of the nephrolitometric scoring systems (NSSs) remains unclear, no study has been conducted to assess the effectiveness of these scoring systems in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) performed in the supine position. We aimed to compare the CROES, Guy's scoring system (GSS), S.T.O.N.E., and S-ReSC NSSs for success and complications in patients undergoing supine mini-PNL (m-PNL). The prospectively recorded data of the patients who underwent supine m-PNL was reviewed retrospectively, and a total of 112 patients were included in the study. Demographic, operation, post-procedure data, and CROES, GSS, S.T.O.N.E., and S-ReSC scores were assessed and compared between the stone-free (SF) and residuel groups. There were significant differences between the SF and residual groups in terms of mean CROES, S.T.O.N.E., and S-ReSC scores (p = 0.003, p = 0.009, and p = 0.015, respectively). Similarly, there were significant differences between the grades of these scoring systems and the success of the procedure (p = 0.035, p = 0.007, and p = 0.007, respectively). However, the GSS was insignificant. The area under curve values in ROC analysis of CROES, S.T.O.N.E., and S-ReSC NSSs were 0.695, 0.665, and 0.656, respectively (p = 0.003, p = 0.011, and p = 0.017, respectively). No statistically significant difference was found between the grades of all four NSSs and the complication rates. The study showed a strong correlation between CROES, STONE, and S-ReSC NSSs in predicting SF status after supine m-PNL. However, none of the NSSs could predict the complications.

The safety and efficacy of miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children.

To assess the use of miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) for renal stones in children, as well as its safety and efficacy. Seventy-seven patients with more than 15 mm renal stones whose age was less than 15 years were enrolled in this prospective case-controlled study at Al-Ramadi Teaching Hospital, Ar Razi Private Hospital, and Ghazi Al-Hariri Hospital for Surgical Specialties, Anbar and Baghdad, Iraq. The study was conducted from January 2020 to January 2024. The group mentioned above served as group A, and it was compared to the control group (group B), which consisted of 70 adult patients aged 18-60 years. Patients in both groups underwent mini-PCNL. Gender, stone size and location, time of operation, stone-free rate, hemoglobin drop, need for blood transfusion, postoperative fever, associated visceral injury, and need for further interventions such as extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy or flexible ureteroscopy (ESWL or FURS) were compared in both groups. The age of patients in group A ranged from 8 months to 15 years with a mean (4.30 ± 3.16), while in group B ranged from 18 to 60 years with a mean (36.3 ± 12.0), p-value 0.001. There were no statistically significant differences regarding gender distribution, stone size, and location, p-value > 0.05. The stone-free rate was 87.01% for group A and 88.57% for group B, with no statistical difference, p-value 0.773. Hemoglobin drop was 1.096 ± 0.412 for group A and 1.195 ± 0.110 for group B, p-value 0.046. Blood transfusion was needed in one case in each group with no statistical difference, p-value 0.946. The need for ESWL was 3 cases in group A, and 2 cases in group B, with no statistical difference between the two groups, p-value 0.729. The need for FURS was 4 cases in group A and 3 cases in group B, p-value 0.796. Operative time was 30 to 125 min in group A and 34 to 129 min in group B, p-value 0.941. Postoperative fever was seen in 23 cases in group A and 21 cases in group B, p-value 0.986. Minor liver injury was seen was seen in one case in each group. The use of mini-PCNL for treating renal stones in children is safe and effective as it is associated with a relatively low rate of significant complications and achieves a high stone-free rate.

Microchannel percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy for the treatment of 1-2 cm high hardness single upper ureteral stones: a propensity score-matched study.

The objective of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of microchannel percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (MPCNL) with flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (FURL) in the treatment of single upper ureteral stones with a diameter of 1-2 cm and high hardness. This study retrospectively analyzed 89 patients diagnosed with a single upper ureteral stone with a 1-2 cm diameter and a computed tomography value > 1000 Hounsfield units. A propensity score matching system matched this study with factors to minimize the effect of baseline differences between patients. Ultimately, 29 patients in each of the two groups were successfully matched. The stone-free rate was marginally higher in the MPCNL group than in the FURL group (93.10% vs. 86.21%), although the difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.666). Furthermore, the mean operative time in the MPCNL group, although slightly longer than that in the FURL group, did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference (P = 0.833). However, patients in the MPCNL group exhibited a significantly more substantial decrease in hemoglobin than those in the FURL group (P < 0.001) and a substantially more extended postoperative hospital stay (P < 0.001). Regarding perioperative complications, the incidence of moderate pain was higher in the MPCNL group than in the FURL group (P = 0.037). The difference in overall complication rates between the two groups did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.108). MPCNL and FURL are efficacious surgical procedures for treating single upper ureteral stones with a 1-2 cm diameter and high hardness.

A meta analysis of the lateral decubitus position and prone position percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Objective To analyzed the safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in lateral decubitus position and prone position for upper ureteral calculi. Methods Databases including PubMed, Springer, ScienceDirect, Wiley Online Library, CNKI, CSPD and VIP were searched for clinical controlled studies involved with lateral decubitus position and prone position PCNL from their establishment to November 2023.Studies were enrolled according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. the dates were compared by Review Manager 5.4 software. Results seven studies were eligible, including 807 cases. The Meta-analysis showed that, blood loss and perioperative complication rate of lateral decubitus position PCNL group were significantly different from those of the prone position PCNL group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding hospital time, operative time, channel establishment time and stone-free rate (P>0.05).Conclusions The lateral decubitus position can reduce blood loss and perioperative complication rate. The lateral decubitus position PCNL is safe and effective for upper ureteral calculi which was deserved clinical popularizing use.

Effects of anterior quadratus lumborum block versus erector spinae plane block on postoperative acute pain in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective, observational study.

BACKGROUND: The study aimed to compare the pain-relieving effectiveness of anterior quadratus lumborum block (QLB3) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB), both of which have been documented to provide relief during abdominal surgery. METHODS: This prospective observational study, conducted between February and July 2023, included 96 patients who had undergone percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Patients were divided into three groups: QLB3, ESPB, and control (no block) and received the corresponding nerve block in the preanesthetic room for regional block. Cumulative morphine consumption during the initial 24 h after PCNL, numerical rating scale resting/movement scores, intraoperative remifentanil usage, rescue analgesic requirements, time when the first analgesic was requested, and postoperative nausea and vomiting scores were documented and compared between the groups. RESULTS: Total median morphine consumption in the first 24 h postoperatively was similar in the QLB3 and ESPB groups but higher in the control group (QLB3, 7 mg [(Q1-Q3) 7-8.5]; ESPB, 8 mg [6.5-9]; control, 12.5 [10-17]; P < 0.001). Similarly, median intraoperative remifentanil consumption did not differ between the block groups but was higher in the control group (QLB3, 1082 µg [IQR 805.5-1292.7]; ESPB, 1278 µg [940.2-1297.5]; control, 1561 µg [1315-2068]; P < 0.001). The number of patients receiving rescue analgesic medication was similar in the block groups but higher in the control group (QLB3, n = 9 [30%]; ESPB, n = 14 [46.7%]; control, n = 21 [70%]; P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: QLB3 and ESPB were adequate and comparable in providing postoperative analgesia as part of multimodal analgesia after PCNL. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT05822492).

Exploring the competency of the comprehensive complication index over the clavien-dindo classification in standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a call for better complication reporting.

PURPOSE: The Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) was introduced in 2013 to overcome the limitations of the Clavien-Dindo Classification (CDC) in grading postoperative complications. The objective of this study to assess the predictive value of the CDC and the CCI for postoperative course in patients undergoing standard adult percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 320 renal units that underwent standard PCNL between July 2021 - April 2023 was conducted. The CDC and CCI systems assessed complications occurring within the first 30 days after surgery. A second CCI score was calculated only on the highest CDC grade, and this score was referred to as the noncumulative CCI. A comparative analysis was conducted to determine the predictive efficacy of both evaluation methods regarding the postoperative course. RESULTS: The postoperative complication rate was 23.1% (74/320). Eight patients (2.5%) experienced multiple complications, resulting in a higher total CCI score than the noncumulative CCI (p = 0.010). Correlation analysis revealed that the CCI correlated with the length of hospital stay (LOS) more precisely than the noncumulative CCI (CCI: r = 0.335; p = 0.004 vs. noncumulative CCI: r = 0.325; p = 0.005). Compared with patients with a single complication, those with multiple complications had similar demographics, preoperative stone characteristics, and intraoperative features. CONCLUSION: Cumulative CCI proves to be a more effective predictor of LOS and complication burden in standard PCNL than CDC. Hence, using CCI to evaluate complications after PCNL may be a more appropriate approach.

Risk factors and prediction model for postoperative complications in patients with struvite stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the risk factors for complications in patients with struvite stones following percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or flexible ureteroscopy (fURS), and to establish a nomogram for postoperative complications in patients following PCNL. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with struvite stones after PCNL and fURS at the Department of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, from January 2012 to March 2022. The common pathogens and antimicrobial susceptibilities in preoperative midstream urine culture were analyzed. Logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the risk factors. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to assess the discrimination, accuracy, and practicability of the nomogram. RESULTS: 332 patients with struvite stones received one-stage PCNL or fURS, including 243 cases of PCNL and 89 cases of fURS. 72 patients (21.69%) developed postoperative complications. The most common pathogens in preoperative urine cultures were Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis, and Enterococcus faecalis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that preoperative hemoglobin (OR = 0.981, P = 0.042), staghorn stone (OR = 4.226, P = 0.037), and positive preoperative midstream urine culture (OR = 2.000, P = 0.043) were independent risk factors for postoperative complications in patients following PCNL. The nomogram showed good performance in discrimination, accuracy, and applicability. CONCLUSION: Preoperative hemoglobin, staghorn stone, and positive preoperative midstream urine culture were independent risk factors for postoperative complications in patients with struvite stones following PCNL. A nomogram was developed to predict the probability of postoperative complications.

Are very thin patients at a higher risk of complications when submitted to percutane-ous nephrolithotomy?

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of thinness on the outcome of the percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A matched case-control study was performed using a prospectively collected database of all patients who underwent PCNL between June 2011 and October 2021. The patients were stratified into two groups according to their phenotypic characteristics, arbitrarily defined according to their body mass index (BMI): <0kg/m2 (Group 1, very thin patients, G<20) and ≥25 kg/m2 (Group 2, non-thin patients, G≥25). Patients were randomly matched based on Guy's Stone Score (GSS) according to case complexity at a ratio of 1:3. RESULTS: A total of 204 patients were enrolled in this study: 51 patients (G<20) and 153 controls (G≥25). Complications occurred in 15.2% of the patients, with 5.4% of these complications classified as major complications (Clavien grade ≥ 3). According to complications there were no significant differences between the groups. The overall complication rates were 17.6% in the G<20 and 14.4% in the G≥25 (p = 0.653). The major complication rates were 3.9% in the G<20 and 5.8% in the G≥25 (p=0.429). No differences in transfusion or urinary fistula rates were found. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, very thin patients were not at a higher risk of complications when submitted to PCNL than in those with a BMI of ≥25 kg/m2. Apparently, this technique can be used in these patients, just as it is used in any other type of patient, independently of their BMI.

Analyzing learning curve for supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy in urology resident training programme: comparative analysis.

INTRODUCTION: This article attempts to provide a comprehensive review of the learning objectives and importance of the supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) technique. MATERIAL METHOD: We retrospectively reviewed the cases of Supine PCNL between January 2018 and January 2024. We divided the groups into 3: residents between 2 and 3 years (Group 1), residents between 4 and 5 years (Group 2), and endourologist (Group 3). The 2-3-year resident started to perform PCNL for the first time, while the 4-5-year resident started to perform Supine PCNL for the first time while previously performing prone PCNL. RESULTS: Access, fluoroscopy, and operation time were higher in Group 1, shorter in Group 2, and shortest in Group 3 (p < 0.001). Postoperative length of stay and the need for additional treatment were found to be shorter (p < 0.001), and the stone-free rate (SFR) increased (p < 0.001) from Group 1 to Group 3. The highest complication rates were observed in Group 1 (p = 0.002). SFR rate increased as the number of cases increased in Group 1 patients. Success was stable after 46-60 cases in terms of SFR. In Group 2, the SFR rate was stable after 31-45. CASES: The most complications were observed in Group 1 and the least in Group 3. CONCLUSION: In 2-3-year residents, access time and fluoroscopy time decrease with experience. In 4-5-year residents, due to their expertise in prone PCNL, the operation time and fluoroscopy time decrease with the number of cases performed. SFR is higher after 46-60 cases for 2-3-year residents and 31-45 cases for 4-5-year residents.

Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy combined with retrograde intrarenal surgery and multi-tract percutaneous nephrolithotripsy for octopus stone: A propensity score-matching study.

To compared the effectiveness and safety of single standard mini percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (SM-PCNL) combined with retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and multiple standard mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MSM-PCNL) in the treatment of octopus stone of 2 to 4 cm. The clinical data of SM-PCNL combined with RIRS and MSM-PCNL for octopus stone with a 2 to 4 cm diameter from October 2019 to December 2022 were analyzed retrospectively, and propensity score matching was used to screen patients. The matched patients were paired, and the operation time, complications, postoperative pain, tubeless rate, stone-free rate (SFR), and postoperative hospital stay were further compared between the 2 groups. 88 patients underwent SM-PCNL combined with RIRS (combined group), and 143 patients underwent MSM-PCNL (multiple channel group). After matching analysis, there were 49 patients in each group, and there was no significant difference in the general preoperative data between the 2 groups. The perioperative complications and stone-free rate were no statistical difference. In postoperative pain (4.00 ±â€…0.74 vs 5.00 ±â€…0.74, P = .00), tubeless rate (44.90% vs 20.41%, P = .01), hemoglobin drop (9.38 ±â€…7.48 vs 14.22 ±â€…7.69, P = .01), postoperative hospital stay (3.37 ±â€…1.09 vs 5.08 ±â€…1.29, P = .00), the combined group was significantly better than the multiple channel group. Regarding operation time, the combined group was more than the multiple channel group (103.27 ±â€…27.61 vs 78.39 ±â€…19.31, P = .000). For octopus stone with a diameter of 2 to 4 cm, the effectiveness and safety of SM-PCNL combined with RIRS were similar to those of MSM-PCNL The surgeon should carefully evaluate the patient's physical condition, stone characteristics, and expectations before the operation and assist the patient in choosing an appropriate plan.

Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery: best practices and future perspectives.

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery (ECIRS) has emerged as a promising technique for the management of large and complex kidney stones, potentially offering advantages over traditional Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL). This study aims to evaluate best practices, outcomes, and future perspectives associated with ECIRS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive PubMed search was conducted from 2008 to 2024, using MESH terms and the following key words: "ECIRS" and "Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery" The search yielded 157 articles, including retrospective cohort studies, two randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and four meta-analyses comparing ECIRS with PCNL. Most important findings were summarized regarding indications, patient positioning, kidney access, tract size, surgical outcomes, and complications. RESULTS: ECIRS demonstrated higher stone-free rate, lower complication rate, and a reduced need for multiple procedures compared to traditional PCNL. Additionally, ECIRS has the potential to integrate new technologies to further enhance outcomes. CONCLUSION: ECIRS demonstrates significant advantages in the management of large kidney stones. Future research should focus on well-designed RCTs to provide robust evidence of its efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness, potentially establishing ECIRS as the first option treatment for complex kidney stones.

Navigating the complexities of a forgotten double J stent.

Double-J (DJ) stents are most commonly used urological tools these days. Serious complications may occur when stents are left in place for longer duration. We present a case of a woman in her 40s with a forgotten DJ stent for 4 years, leading to complications such as encrustations, bladder and renal stone formation. The patient underwent a comprehensive endourological approach, including endoscopic cystolithotomy and left-sided percutaneous nephrolithotomy. The case highlights the importance of timely stent removal to prevent complications such as encrustations and stone formation. Patient education and counselling are crucial to avoid poor compliance and the associated risks of forgotten stents. This case underscores the significance of a multidisciplinary approach and emphasises the need for proactive measures to prevent such complications, including the implementation of a stent placement registry.

Safety and efficacy of vacuum-assisted mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of renal stone disease: an analysis of stone free status and postoperative infectious complications.

PURPOSE: Vacuum-assisted mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (vmPCNL) is being increasingly adopted due to its faster operating times and lower incidence of postoperative infectious complications (IC), however, studies have been limited by small sample sizes. We hypothesize that vmPCNL is an efficacious treatment for renal stone disease with acceptable stone-free rates (SFR) and low incidence of IC. The objectives of this study were to measure SFR three months after surgery, determine the factors influencing SFR, and determine the rates of postoperative IC after vmPCNL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven hundred and sixty seven patients underwent vmPCNL for the treatment of renal stones > 20 mm at a single institution. Patients underwent postoperative computed tomography at three months to assess SFR. Postoperative fever and SIRS/Sepsis were recorded for individual patients. Multivariate logistics regression was performed to assess predictors of SFR. RESULTS: The SFR was found to be 73.7% at three months. Stone burden (OR 0.39, 95% CI [0.33-0.46]) and age (OR 1.03, 95% CI [1.01-1.04]) emerged as statistically significant predictors of SFR on multivariate analysis. 5.5% of patients experienced postoperative fever, while 2.9% experienced SIRS/Sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest continuous cohort of patients to undergo vmPCNL for stone disease and demonstrates that vmPCNL is safe and efficacious, with an SFR of 74% at three months. The incidence of postoperative fever and SIRS/Sepsis is 5.5% and 2.9% respectively. Further randomized studies with large sample sizes are required to ascertain the rates of these complications in comparison to conventional approaches.

Which Position for Novice Surgeons? Effect of Supine and Prone Positions on Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Learning Curve.

Background and Objectives: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a current treatment method with high success rates and low complication rates in treating large kidney stones. It can be conducted in different positions, especially supine and prone positions. PCNL in the supine position is becoming increasingly common due to its advantages, such as simultaneous retrograde intervention and better anesthesia management. This study aimed to assess how the choice of position impacts the PCNL learning curve. Materials and Methods: The results of the first 50 consecutive PCNL cases performed by two separate chief residents as primary surgeons in supine and prone positions in a reference center for stone treatment between August 2021 and January 2023 were evaluated. The two groups' demographic and clinical data, stone-free rates, operation times, and fluoroscopy times were compared. Results: While the mean operation time was 94.6 ± 9.8 min in the supine PCNL group, it was 129.9 ± 20.3 min in the prone PCNL group (p < 0.001). Median fluoroscopy times in the supine PCNL and prone PCNL groups were 31 (10-89) seconds and 48 (23-156) seconds, respectively (p = 0.001). During the operation, the plateau was reached after the 10th case in the supine PCNL group, while it was reached after the 40th case in the prone PCNL group. Conclusions: For surgeons who are novices in performing PCNL, supine PCNL may offer both better results and a faster learning curve. Prospective and randomized studies can provide more robust conclusions on this subject.