Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 434
Filter
1.
Cancer Immunol Immunother ; 73(9): 173, 2024 Jul 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38953982

ABSTRACT

Recent studies have indicated that combining oncolytic viruses with CAR-T cells in therapy has shown superior anti-tumor effects, representing a promising approach. Nonetheless, the localized delivery method of intratumoral injection poses challenges for treating metastatic tumors or distal tumors that are difficult to reach. To address this obstacle, we employed HSV-1-infected CAR-T cells, which systemically delivery HSV into solid tumors. The biological function of CAR-T cells remained intact after loading them with HSV for a period of three days. In both immunocompromised and immunocompetent GBM orthotopic mouse models, B7-H3 CAR-T cells effectively delivered HSV to tumor lesions, resulting in enhanced T-cell infiltration and significantly prolonged survival in mice. We also employed a bilateral subcutaneous tumor model and observed that the group receiving intratumoral virus injection exhibited a significant reduction in tumor volume on the injected side, while the group receiving intravenous infusion of CAR-T cells carrying HSV displayed suppressed tumor growth on both sides. Hence, CAR-THSV cells offer notable advantages in the systemic delivery of HSV to distant tumors. In conclusion, our findings emphasize the potential of CAR-T cells as carriers for HSV, presenting significant advantages for oncolytic virotherapy targeting distant tumors.


Subject(s)
Immunotherapy, Adoptive , Oncolytic Virotherapy , Oncolytic Viruses , Receptors, Chimeric Antigen , Animals , Mice , Oncolytic Virotherapy/methods , Humans , Oncolytic Viruses/immunology , Oncolytic Viruses/genetics , Immunotherapy, Adoptive/methods , Receptors, Chimeric Antigen/immunology , Herpesvirus 1, Human/immunology , Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays , Cell Line, Tumor , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Female , Glioblastoma/therapy , Glioblastoma/immunology
2.
Math Biosci Eng ; 21(5): 5900-5946, 2024 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38872564

ABSTRACT

Resistance to treatment poses a major challenge for cancer therapy, and oncoviral treatment encounters the issue of viral resistance as well. In this investigation, we introduce deterministic differential equation models to explore the effect of resistance on oncolytic viral therapy. Specifically, we classify tumor cells into resistant, sensitive, or infected with respect to oncolytic viruses for our analysis. Immune cells can eliminate both tumor cells and viruses. Our research shows that the introduction of immune cells into the tumor-virus interaction prevents all tumor cells from becoming resistant in the absence of conversion from resistance to sensitivity, given that the proliferation rate of immune cells exceeds their death rate. The inclusion of immune cells leads to an additional virus-free equilibrium when the immune cell recruitment rate is sufficiently high. The total tumor burden at this virus-free equilibrium is smaller than that at the virus-free and immune-free equilibrium. Therefore, immune cells are capable of reducing the tumor load under the condition of sufficient immune strength. Numerical investigations reveal that the virus transmission rate and parameters related to the immune response significantly impact treatment outcomes. However, monotherapy alone is insufficient for eradicating tumor cells, necessitating the implementation of additional therapies. Further numerical simulation shows that combination therapy with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR T-cell) therapy can enhance the success of treatment.


Subject(s)
Computer Simulation , Neoplasms , Oncolytic Virotherapy , Oncolytic Viruses , Oncolytic Virotherapy/methods , Humans , Neoplasms/therapy , Neoplasms/immunology , Oncolytic Viruses/immunology , Oncolytic Viruses/physiology , Animals , Tumor Burden , Cell Proliferation
3.
Viruses ; 16(6)2024 May 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38932177

ABSTRACT

Newcastle disease virus (NDV) is an avian pathogen with an unsegmented negative-strand RNA genome that belongs to the Paramyxoviridae family. While primarily pathogenic in birds, NDV presents no threat to human health, rendering it a safe candidate for various biomedical applications. Extensive research has highlighted the potential of NDV as a vector for vaccine development and gene therapy, owing to its transcriptional modularity, low recombination rate, and lack of a DNA phase during replication. Furthermore, NDV exhibits oncolytic capabilities, efficiently eliciting antitumor immune responses, thereby positioning it as a promising therapeutic agent for cancer treatment. This article comprehensively reviews the biological characteristics of NDV, elucidates the molecular mechanisms underlying its oncolytic properties, and discusses its applications in the fields of vaccine vector development and tumor therapy.


Subject(s)
Genetic Vectors , Neoplasms , Newcastle disease virus , Oncolytic Virotherapy , Oncolytic Viruses , Newcastle disease virus/genetics , Newcastle disease virus/immunology , Animals , Humans , Genetic Vectors/genetics , Neoplasms/therapy , Neoplasms/immunology , Oncolytic Virotherapy/methods , Oncolytic Viruses/genetics , Oncolytic Viruses/immunology , Genetic Therapy/methods , Viral Vaccines/immunology , Viral Vaccines/genetics , Newcastle Disease/prevention & control , Newcastle Disease/therapy , Newcastle Disease/virology , Newcastle Disease/immunology , Vaccine Development/methods
4.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1375413, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38895115

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) are aggressive sarcomas with unacceptably low cure rates occurring often in patients with neurofibromatosis 1 defects. To investigate oncolytic Herpes Simplex Virus (oHSV) as an immunotherapeutic approach, we compared viral replication, functional activity, and immune response between unarmed and interleukin 12 (IL-12)-armed oncolytic viruses in virus-permissive (B109) and -resistant (67C-4) murine MPNSTs. Methods: This study compared two attenuated IL-12-oHSVs with γ134.5 gene deletions (Δγ134.5) and the same transgene expression cassette. The primary difference in the IL-12-oHSVs was in their ability to counter the translational arrest response in infected cells. Unlike M002 (Δγ134.5, mIL-12), C002 (Δγ134.5, mIL-12, IRS1) expresses an HCMV IRS1 gene and evades dsRNA activated translational arrest in infected cells. Results and discussion: Our results show that oHSV replication and gene expression results in vitro were not predictive of oHSV direct oncolytic activity in vivo. Tumors that supported viral replication in cell culture studies resisted viral replication by both oHSVs and restricted M002 transgene expression in vivo. Furthermore, two IL-12-oHSVs with equivalent transcriptional activity differed in IL-12 protein production in vivo, and the differences in IL-12 protein levels were reflected in immune infiltrate activity changes as well as tumor growth suppression differences between the IL-12-oHSVs. C002-treated tumors exhibited sustained IL-12 production with improved dendritic cells, monocyte-macrophage activity (MHCII, CD80/CD86 upregulation) and a polyfunctional Th1-cell response in the tumor infiltrates. Conclusion: These results suggest that transgene protein production differences between oHSVs in vivo, in addition to replication differences, can impact OV-therapeutic activity.


Subject(s)
Interleukin-12 , Oncolytic Virotherapy , Oncolytic Viruses , Transgenes , Virus Replication , Animals , Interleukin-12/genetics , Interleukin-12/metabolism , Mice , Oncolytic Virotherapy/methods , Oncolytic Viruses/genetics , Oncolytic Viruses/immunology , Cell Line, Tumor , Immunotherapy/methods , Humans , Simplexvirus/genetics , Dendritic Cells/immunology , Female
5.
Nat Commun ; 15(1): 5442, 2024 Jun 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38937436

ABSTRACT

Although patients benefit from immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) therapy in a broad variety of tumors, resistance may arise from immune suppressive tumor microenvironments (TME), which is particularly true of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Since oncolytic viruses (OV) can generate a highly immune-infiltrated, inflammatory TME, OVs could potentially restore ICI responsiveness via recruitment, priming, and activation of anti-tumor T cells. Here we find that on the contrary, an oncolytic vesicular stomatitis virus, expressing interferon-ß (VSV-IFNß), antagonizes the effect of anti-PD-L1 therapy in a partially anti-PD-L1-responsive model of HCC. Cytometry by Time of Flight shows that VSV-IFNß expands dominant anti-viral effector CD8 T cells with concomitant relative disappearance of anti-tumor T cell populations, which are the target of anti-PD-L1. However, by expressing a range of HCC tumor antigens within VSV, combination OV and anti-PD-L1 therapeutic benefit could be restored. Our data provide a cautionary message for the use of highly immunogenic viruses as tumor-specific immune-therapeutics by showing that dominant anti-viral T cell responses can inhibit sub-dominant anti-tumor T cell responses. However, through encoding tumor antigens within the virus, oncolytic virotherapy can generate anti-tumor T cell populations upon which immune checkpoint blockade can effectively work.


Subject(s)
Antigens, Neoplasm , B7-H1 Antigen , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular , Liver Neoplasms , Oncolytic Virotherapy , Oncolytic Viruses , Tumor Microenvironment , Oncolytic Viruses/genetics , Oncolytic Viruses/immunology , Animals , Oncolytic Virotherapy/methods , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/therapy , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/immunology , Tumor Microenvironment/immunology , Mice , B7-H1 Antigen/metabolism , B7-H1 Antigen/genetics , B7-H1 Antigen/immunology , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/therapy , Liver Neoplasms/immunology , Antigens, Neoplasm/immunology , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Cell Line, Tumor , Interferon-beta/metabolism , Interferon-beta/immunology , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/pharmacology , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Female , Vesiculovirus/immunology , Vesiculovirus/genetics
6.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1355566, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38835775

ABSTRACT

Dendritic cell (DC)-based vaccines have emerged as a promising strategy in cancer immunotherapy due to low toxicity. However, the therapeutic efficacy of DC as a monotherapy is insufficient due to highly immunosuppressive tumor environment. To address these limitations of DC as immunotherapeutic agent, we have developed a polymeric nanocomplex incorporating (1) oncolytic adenovirus (oAd) co-expressing interleukin (IL)-12 and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and (2) arginine-grafted bioreducible polymer with PEGylated paclitaxel (APP) to restore antitumor immune surveillance function in tumor milieu and potentiate immunostimulatory attributes of DC vaccine. Nanohybrid complex (oAd/APP) in combination with DC (oAd/APP+DC) induced superior expression level of antitumor cytokines (IL-12, GM-CSF, and interferon gamma) than either oAd/APP or DC monotherapy in tumor tissues, thus resulting in superior intratumoral infiltration of both endogenous and exogenous DCs. Furthermore, oAd/APP+DC treatment led superior migration of DC to secondary lymphoid organs, such as draining lymph nodes and spleen, in comparison with either monotherapy. Superior migration profile of DCs in oAd/APP+DC treatment group resulted in more prolific activation of tumor-specific T cells in these lymphoid organs and greater intratumoral infiltration of T cells. Additionally, oAd/APP+DC treatment led to lower subset of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and splenocytes being immunosuppressive regulatory T cells than any other treatment groups. Collectively, oAd/APP+DC led to superior induction of antitumor immune response and amelioration of immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment to elicit potent tumor growth inhibition than either monotherapy.


Subject(s)
Adenoviridae , Dendritic Cells , Oncolytic Virotherapy , Oncolytic Viruses , Paclitaxel , Dendritic Cells/immunology , Animals , Paclitaxel/pharmacology , Adenoviridae/genetics , Mice , Oncolytic Viruses/immunology , Oncolytic Viruses/genetics , Oncolytic Virotherapy/methods , Combined Modality Therapy , Cell Line, Tumor , Humans , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Cancer Vaccines/immunology , Immunotherapy/methods , Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor/metabolism , Female , Tumor Microenvironment/immunology , Tumor Microenvironment/drug effects
7.
Cell Biochem Funct ; 42(4): e4055, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38856033

ABSTRACT

The heterogeneity of the solid tumor microenvironment (TME) impairs the therapeutic efficacy of standard therapies and also reduces the infiltration of antitumor immune cells, all of which lead to tumor progression and invasion. In addition, self-renewing cancer stem cells (CSCs) support tumor dormancy, drug resistance, and recurrence, all of which might pose challenges to the eradication of malignant tumor masses with current therapies. Natural forms of oncolytic viruses (OVs) or engineered OVs are known for their potential to directly target and kill tumor cells or indirectly eradicate tumor cells by involving antitumor immune responses, including enhancement of infiltrating antitumor immune cells, induction of immunogenic cell death, and reprogramming of cold TME to an immune-sensitive hot state. More importantly, OVs can target stemness factors that promote tumor progression, which subsequently enhances the efficacy of immunotherapies targeting solid tumors, particularly the CSC subpopulation. Herein, we describe the role of CSCs in tumor heterogeneity and resistance and then highlight the potential and remaining challenges of immunotherapies targeting CSCs. We then review the potential of OVs to improve tumor immunogenicity and target CSCs and finally summarize the challenges within the therapeutic application of OVs in preclinical and clinical trials.


Subject(s)
Immunotherapy , Neoplasms , Neoplastic Stem Cells , Oncolytic Virotherapy , Oncolytic Viruses , Humans , Neoplastic Stem Cells/immunology , Oncolytic Viruses/genetics , Oncolytic Viruses/immunology , Neoplasms/therapy , Neoplasms/immunology , Tumor Microenvironment/immunology , Animals
8.
Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer ; 1879(4): 189110, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38754793

ABSTRACT

Oncolytic viruses (OVs) are increasingly recognized as potent tools in cancer therapy, effectively targeting and eradicating oncogenic conditions while sparing healthy cells. They enhance antitumor immunity by triggering various immune responses throughout the cancer cycle. Genetically engineered OVs swiftly destroy cancerous tissues and activate the immune system by releasing soluble antigens like danger signals and interferons. Their ability to stimulate both innate and adaptive immunity makes them particularly attractive in cancer immunotherapy. Recent advancements involve combining OVs with other immune therapies, yielding promising results. Transgenic OVs, designed to enhance immunostimulation and specifically target cancer cells, further improve immune responses. This review highlights the intrinsic mechanisms of OVs and underscores their synergistic potential with other immunotherapies. It also proposes strategies for optimizing armed OVs to bolster immunity against tumors.


Subject(s)
Immunotherapy , Neoplasms , Oncolytic Virotherapy , Oncolytic Viruses , Humans , Neoplasms/therapy , Neoplasms/immunology , Oncolytic Viruses/immunology , Oncolytic Viruses/genetics , Oncolytic Virotherapy/methods , Immunotherapy/methods , Animals
9.
J Immunother Cancer ; 12(5)2024 May 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38821716

ABSTRACT

Cytokines are small proteins that regulate the growth and functional activity of immune cells, and several have been approved for cancer therapy. Oncolytic viruses are agents that mediate antitumor activity by directly killing tumor cells and inducing immune responses. Talimogene laherparepvec is an oncolytic herpes simplex virus type 1 (oHSV), approved for the treatment of recurrent melanoma, and the virus encodes the human cytokine, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). A significant advantage of oncolytic viruses is the ability to deliver therapeutic payloads to the tumor site that can help drive antitumor immunity. While cytokines are especially interesting as payloads, the optimal cytokine(s) used in oncolytic viruses remains controversial. In this review, we highlight preliminary data with several cytokines and chemokines, including GM-CSF, interleukin 12, FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 ligand, tumor necrosis factor α, interleukin 2, interleukin 15, interleukin 18, chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2, chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 5, chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 4, or their combinations, and show how these payloads can further enhance the antitumor immunity of oHSV. A better understanding of cytokine delivery by oHSV can help improve clinical benefit from oncolytic virus immunotherapy in patients with cancer.


Subject(s)
Cytokines , Immunotherapy , Neoplasms , Oncolytic Virotherapy , Oncolytic Viruses , Humans , Oncolytic Virotherapy/methods , Oncolytic Viruses/immunology , Oncolytic Viruses/genetics , Cytokines/metabolism , Immunotherapy/methods , Neoplasms/therapy , Neoplasms/immunology , Animals , Simplexvirus/immunology , Simplexvirus/genetics , Herpesvirus 1, Human/immunology
10.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1360436, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38812516

ABSTRACT

Bladder cancer is a common type of cancer around the world, and the majority of patients are diagnosed with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Although low-risk NMIBC has a good prognosis, the disease recurrence rate and development of treatment-refractory disease remain high in intermediate- to high-risk NMIBC patients. To address these challenges for the treatment of NMIBC, a novel combination therapy composed of an oncolytic adenovirus (oAd) co-expressing interleukin (IL)-12, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and relaxin (RLX; HY-oAd) and a clinical-stage glycogen synthase kinase (GSK)-3ß inhibitor (9-ING-41; elraglusib) was investigated in the present report. Our findings demonstrate that HY-oAd and 9-ING-41 combination therapy (HY-oAd+9-ING-41) exerted superior inhibition of tumor growth compared with respective monotherapy in a syngeneic NMIBC tumor model. HY-oAd+9-ING-41 induced high-level tumor extracellular matrix (ECM) degradation and a more potent antitumor immune response than the respective monotherapy. In detail, HY-oAd+9-ING-41 induced superior accumulation of intratumoral T cells, prevention of immune cell exhaustion, and induction of tumor-specific adaptive immune response compared to either monotherapy. Collectively, these results demonstrate that the combination of HY-oAd and 9-ING-41 may be a promising approach to elicit a potent antitumor immune response against bladder cancer.


Subject(s)
Adenoviridae , Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 beta , Oncolytic Virotherapy , Oncolytic Viruses , Tumor Microenvironment , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/therapy , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/immunology , Tumor Microenvironment/immunology , Tumor Microenvironment/drug effects , Animals , Adenoviridae/genetics , Oncolytic Virotherapy/methods , Oncolytic Viruses/immunology , Mice , Humans , Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 beta/antagonists & inhibitors , Cell Line, Tumor , Combined Modality Therapy , Female
11.
Curr Oncol Rep ; 26(7): 826-839, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38789670

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review provides a comprehensive update on recent advancements in melanoma treatment by highlighting promising therapeutics with an aim to increase awareness of novel interventions currently in development. RECENT FINDINGS: Over the last decade there has been considerable expansion of the previously available treatment options for patients with melanoma. In particular, novel immunotherapeutics have been developed to expand on the clinical advancements brought by BRAF targeting and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Despite the success of checkpoint inhibitors there remains an unmet need for patients that do not respond to treatment. This review delves into the latest advancements in novel checkpoint inhibitors, cytokines, oncolytic viruses, vaccines, bispecific antibodies, and adoptive cell therapy. Preclinical experiments and early-stage clinical trials studies have demonstrated promising results for these therapies, many of which have moved into pivotal, phase 3 studies.


Subject(s)
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors , Melanoma , Humans , Melanoma/drug therapy , Melanoma/immunology , Melanoma/therapy , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/pharmacology , Immunotherapy/methods , Cancer Vaccines/therapeutic use , Oncolytic Viruses/immunology , Antibodies, Bispecific/therapeutic use , Cytokines/antagonists & inhibitors , Cytokines/metabolism , Oncolytic Virotherapy/methods , Molecular Targeted Therapy/methods
12.
Mol Ther ; 32(7): 2406-2422, 2024 Jul 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38734899

ABSTRACT

Vaccinia viruses (VACVs) are versatile therapeutic agents and different features of various VACV strains allow for a broad range of therapeutic applications. Modified VACV Ankara (MVA) is a particularly altered VACV strain that is highly immunogenic, incapable of replicating in mammalian hosts, and broadly used as a safe vector for vaccination. Alternatively, Western Reserve (WR) or Copenhagen (Cop) are VACV strains that efficiently replicate in cancer cells and, therefore, are used to develop oncolytic viruses. However, the immune evasion capacity of WR or Cop hinders their ability to elicit antitumor immune responses, which is crucial for efficacy in the clinic. Here, we describe a new VACV strain named Immune-Oncolytic VACV Ankara (IOVA), which combines efficient replication in cancer cells with induction of immunogenic tumor cell death (ICD). IOVA was engineered from an MVA ancestor and shows superior cytotoxicity in tumor cells. In addition, the IOVA genome incorporates mutations that lead to massive fusogenesis of tumor cells, which contributes to improved antitumor effects. In syngeneic mouse tumor models, the induction of ICD results in robust antitumor immunity directed against tumor neo-epitopes and eradication of large established tumors. These data present IOVA as an improved immunotherapeutic oncolytic vector.


Subject(s)
Immunogenic Cell Death , Oncolytic Virotherapy , Oncolytic Viruses , Vaccinia virus , Vaccinia virus/genetics , Vaccinia virus/immunology , Animals , Oncolytic Viruses/genetics , Oncolytic Viruses/immunology , Mice , Humans , Oncolytic Virotherapy/methods , Cell Line, Tumor , Neoplasms/therapy , Neoplasms/immunology , Virus Replication , Genetic Vectors/genetics
13.
Int J Mol Sci ; 25(9)2024 Apr 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38731910

ABSTRACT

Oncolytic virotherapy is a promising immunotherapy approach for cancer treatment that utilizes viruses to preferentially infect and eliminate cancer cells while stimulating the immune response. In this review, we synthesize the current literature on the molecular circuits of immune sensing and response to oncolytic virotherapy, focusing on viral DNA or RNA sensing by infected cells, cytokine and danger-associated-signal sensing by neighboring cells, and the subsequent downstream activation of immune pathways. These sequential sense-and-response mechanisms involve the triggering of molecular sensors by viruses or infected cells to activate transcription factors and related genes for a breadth of immune responses. We describe how the molecular signals induced in the tumor upon virotherapy can trigger diverse immune signaling pathways, activating both antigen-presenting-cell-based innate and T cell-based adaptive immune responses. Insights into these complex mechanisms provide valuable knowledge for enhancing oncolytic virotherapy strategies.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Oncolytic Virotherapy , Oncolytic Viruses , Humans , Oncolytic Virotherapy/methods , Neoplasms/therapy , Neoplasms/immunology , Oncolytic Viruses/genetics , Oncolytic Viruses/immunology , Animals , Signal Transduction , Immunity, Innate , Immunotherapy/methods
14.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1379613, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38698850

ABSTRACT

Onco-virotherapy is an emergent treatment for cancer based on viral vectors. The therapeutic activity is based on two different mechanisms including tumor-specific oncolysis and immunostimulatory properties. In this study, we evaluated onco-virotherapy in vitro responses on immunocompetent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patient-derived tumoroids (PDTs) and healthy organoids. PDTs are accurate tools to predict patient's clinical responses at the in vitro stage. We showed that onco-virotherapy could exert specific antitumoral effects by producing a higher number of viral particles in PDTs than in healthy organoids. In the present work, we used multiplex protein screening, based on proximity extension assay to highlight different response profiles. Our results pointed to the increase of proteins implied in T cell activation, such as IFN-γ following onco-virotherapy treatment. Based on our observation, oncolytic viruses-based therapy responders are dependent on several factors: a high PD-L1 expression, which is a biomarker of greater immune response under immunotherapies, and the number of viral particles present in tumor tissue, which is dependent to the metabolic state of tumoral cells. Herein, we highlight the use of PDTs as an alternative in vitro model to assess patient-specific responses to onco-virotherapy at the early stage of the preclinical phases.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Drug Discovery , Lung Neoplasms , Oncolytic Virotherapy , Proteomics , Humans , Proteomics/methods , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/immunology , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/therapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/metabolism , Lung Neoplasms/immunology , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Lung Neoplasms/metabolism , Oncolytic Virotherapy/methods , Organoids , Oncolytic Viruses/immunology , Proteome , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , B7-H1 Antigen/metabolism
15.
Breast Cancer Res ; 26(1): 78, 2024 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38750591

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Metastatic breast cancer is a leading cause of cancer death in woman. Current treatment options are often associated with adverse side effects and poor outcomes, demonstrating the need for effective new treatments. Immunotherapies can provide durable outcomes in many cancers; however, limited success has been achieved in metastatic triple negative breast cancer. We tested whether combining different immunotherapies can target metastatic triple negative breast cancer in pre-clinical models. METHODS: Using primary and metastatic 4T1 triple negative mammary carcinoma models, we examined the therapeutic effects of oncolytic vesicular stomatitis virus (VSVΔM51) engineered to express reovirus-derived fusion associated small transmembrane proteins p14 (VSV-p14) or p15 (VSV-p15). These viruses were delivered alone or in combination with natural killer T (NKT) cell activation therapy mediated by adoptive transfer of α-galactosylceramide-loaded dendritic cells. RESULTS: Treatment of primary 4T1 tumors with VSV-p14 or VSV-p15 alone increased immunogenic tumor cell death, attenuated tumor growth, and enhanced immune cell infiltration and activation compared to control oncolytic virus (VSV-GFP) treatments and untreated mice. When combined with NKT cell activation therapy, oncolytic VSV-p14 and VSV-p15 reduced metastatic lung burden to undetectable levels in all mice and generated immune memory as evidenced by enhanced in vitro recall responses (tumor killing and cytokine production) and impaired tumor growth upon rechallenge. CONCLUSION: Combining NKT cell immunotherapy with enhanced oncolytic virotherapy increased anti-tumor immune targeting of lung metastasis and presents a promising treatment strategy for metastatic breast cancer.


Subject(s)
Natural Killer T-Cells , Oncolytic Virotherapy , Oncolytic Viruses , Animals , Female , Mice , Natural Killer T-Cells/immunology , Oncolytic Virotherapy/methods , Humans , Cell Line, Tumor , Oncolytic Viruses/genetics , Oncolytic Viruses/immunology , Immunotherapy/methods , Vesicular stomatitis Indiana virus/genetics , Vesicular stomatitis Indiana virus/immunology , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/immunology , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Combined Modality Therapy , Neoplasm Metastasis , Vesiculovirus/genetics , Dendritic Cells/immunology , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Breast Neoplasms/immunology , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Disease Models, Animal
16.
Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol ; 140: 419-492, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38762277

ABSTRACT

Discovering a therapeutic that can counteract the aggressiveness of this disease's mechanism is crucial for improving survival rates for cancer patients and for better understanding the most different types of cancer. In recent years, using these viruses as an anticancer therapy has been thought to be successful. They mostly work by directly destroying cancer cells, activating the immune system to fight cancer, and expressing exogenous effector genes. For the treatment of tumors, oncolytic viruses (OVs), which can be modified to reproduce only in tumor tissues and lyse them while preserving the healthy non-neoplastic host cells and reinstating antitumor immunity which present a novel immunotherapeutic strategy. OVs can exist naturally or be created in a lab by altering existing viruses. These changes heralded the beginning of a new era of less harmful virus-based cancer therapy. We discuss three different types of oncolytic viruses that have already received regulatory approval to treat cancer as well as clinical research using oncolytic adenoviruses. The primary therapeutic applications, mechanism of action of oncolytic virus updates, future views of this therapy will be covered in this chapter.


Subject(s)
Immunotherapy , Neoplasms , Oncolytic Virotherapy , Oncolytic Viruses , Humans , Oncolytic Viruses/immunology , Oncolytic Viruses/genetics , Neoplasms/therapy , Neoplasms/immunology , Immunotherapy/methods , Oncolytic Virotherapy/methods , Animals
17.
Signal Transduct Target Ther ; 9(1): 118, 2024 May 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38702343

ABSTRACT

Antitumor therapies based on adoptively transferred T cells or oncolytic viruses have made significant progress in recent years, but the limited efficiency of their infiltration into solid tumors makes it difficult to achieve desired antitumor effects when used alone. In this study, an oncolytic virus (rVSV-LCMVG) that is not prone to induce virus-neutralizing antibodies was designed and combined with adoptively transferred T cells. By transforming the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment into an immunosensitive one, in B16 tumor-bearing mice, combination therapy showed superior antitumor effects than monotherapy. This occurred whether the OV was administered intratumorally or intravenously. Combination therapy significantly increased cytokine and chemokine levels within tumors and recruited CD8+ T cells to the TME to trigger antitumor immune responses. Pretreatment with adoptively transferred T cells and subsequent oncolytic virotherapy sensitizes refractory tumors by boosting T-cell recruitment, down-regulating the expression of PD-1, and restoring effector T-cell function. To offer a combination therapy with greater translational value, mRNA vaccines were introduced to induce tumor-specific T cells instead of adoptively transferred T cells. The combination of OVs and mRNA vaccine also displays a significant reduction in tumor burden and prolonged survival. This study proposed a rational combination therapy of OVs with adoptive T-cell transfer or mRNA vaccines encoding tumor-associated antigens, in terms of synergistic efficacy and mechanism.


Subject(s)
Oncolytic Virotherapy , Oncolytic Viruses , Animals , Mice , Oncolytic Viruses/genetics , Oncolytic Viruses/immunology , Oncolytic Virotherapy/methods , Combined Modality Therapy , mRNA Vaccines/immunology , Melanoma, Experimental/therapy , Melanoma, Experimental/immunology , Tumor Microenvironment/immunology , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Humans , Cell Line, Tumor , Cancer Vaccines/immunology , Cancer Vaccines/genetics , Cancer Vaccines/administration & dosage
18.
Nat Commun ; 15(1): 3669, 2024 Apr 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38693119

ABSTRACT

Oncolytic viruses (OVs) show promise as a cancer treatment by selectively replicating in tumor cells and promoting antitumor immunity. However, the current immunogenicity induced by OVs for tumor treatment is relatively weak, necessitating a thorough investigation of the mechanisms underlying its induction of antitumor immunity. Here, we show that HSV-1-based OVs (oHSVs) trigger ZBP1-mediated PANoptosis (a unique innate immune inflammatory cell death modality), resulting in augmented antitumor immune effects. Mechanistically, oHSV enhances the expression of interferon-stimulated genes, leading to the accumulation of endogenous Z-RNA and subsequent activation of ZBP1. To further enhance the antitumor potential of oHSV, we conduct a screening and identify Fusobacterium nucleatum outer membrane vesicle (Fn-OMV) that can increase the expression of PANoptosis execution proteins. The combination of Fn-OMV and oHSV demonstrates potent antitumor immunogenicity. Taken together, our study provides a deeper understanding of oHSV-induced antitumor immunity, and demonstrates a promising strategy that combines oHSV with Fn-OMV.


Subject(s)
Fusobacterium nucleatum , Herpesvirus 1, Human , Oncolytic Virotherapy , Oncolytic Viruses , RNA-Binding Proteins , Herpesvirus 1, Human/immunology , Herpesvirus 1, Human/genetics , Oncolytic Viruses/genetics , Oncolytic Viruses/immunology , Animals , Humans , Oncolytic Virotherapy/methods , Mice , RNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , RNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , RNA-Binding Proteins/immunology , Cell Line, Tumor , Fusobacterium nucleatum/immunology , Neoplasms/therapy , Neoplasms/immunology , Female , Immunity, Innate , Mice, Inbred BALB C
19.
Immunology ; 172(4): 547-565, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38566448

ABSTRACT

Ferroptosis, a necrotic, iron-dependent controlled cell death mechanism, is distinguished by the development of lipid peroxides to fatal proportions. Malignant tumours, influenced by iron to promote fast development, are vulnerable to ferroptosis. Based upon mounting evidence it has been observed that ferroptosis may be immunogenic and hence may complement immunotherapies. A new approach includes iron oxide-loaded nano-vaccines (IONVs), having supremacy for the traits of the tumour microenvironment (TME) to deliver specific antigens through improving the immunostimulatory capacity by molecular disintegration and reversible covalent bonds that target the tumour cells and induce ferroptosis. Apart from IONVs, another newer approach to induce ferroptosis in tumour cells is through oncolytic virus (OVs). One such oncolytic virus is the Newcastle Disease Virus (NDV), which can only multiply in cancer cells through the p53-SLC7A11-GPX4 pathway that leads to elevated levels of lipid peroxide and intracellular reactive oxygen species leading to the induction of ferroptosis that induce ferritinophagy.


Subject(s)
Ferroptosis , Immunotherapy , Neoplasms , Tumor Microenvironment , Humans , Neoplasms/immunology , Neoplasms/therapy , Immunotherapy/methods , Animals , Tumor Microenvironment/immunology , Reactive Oxygen Species/metabolism , Cancer Vaccines/immunology , Oncolytic Viruses/immunology , Oncolytic Virotherapy/methods
20.
Front Med ; 18(3): 411-429, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38453818

ABSTRACT

Oncolytic virus (OV)-based immunotherapy has emerged as a promising strategy for cancer treatment, offering a unique potential to selectively target malignant cells while sparing normal tissues. However, the immunosuppressive nature of tumor microenvironment (TME) poses a substantial hurdle to the development of OVs as effective immunotherapeutic agents, as it restricts the activation and recruitment of immune cells. This review elucidates the potential of OV-based immunotherapy in modulating the immune landscape within the TME to overcome immune resistance and enhance antitumor immune responses. We examine the role of OVs in targeting specific immune cell populations, including dendritic cells, T cells, natural killer cells, and macrophages, and their ability to alter the TME by inhibiting angiogenesis and reducing tumor fibrosis. Additionally, we explore strategies to optimize OV-based drug delivery and improve the efficiency of OV-mediated immunotherapy. In conclusion, this review offers a concise and comprehensive synopsis of the current status and future prospects of OV-based immunotherapy, underscoring its remarkable potential as an effective immunotherapeutic agent for cancer treatment.


Subject(s)
Immunotherapy , Neoplasms , Oncolytic Virotherapy , Oncolytic Viruses , Tumor Microenvironment , Humans , Neoplasms/therapy , Neoplasms/immunology , Tumor Microenvironment/immunology , Oncolytic Virotherapy/methods , Oncolytic Viruses/immunology , Immunotherapy/methods , Dendritic Cells/immunology , Animals
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL