Outcome of patients with solid malignancies considered for intensive care unit admission: a single-center prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: To identify the predictors and outcomes of ICU triage decisions in patients with solid malignancies (SM) and to investigate the usefulness of the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) and quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score at triage. METHODS: All patients with SM for whom ICU admission was requested between July 2019 and December 2021 in a French university-affiliated hospital were included prospectively. RESULTS: Of the 6262 patients considered for ICU admission, 410 (6.5%) had SM (age, 66 [58-73] years; metastases, 60.1%; and performance status 0-2, 81%). Of these 410 patients, 176 (42.9%) were admitted to the ICU, including 141 (80.1%) subsequently discharged alive. Breast cancer, hemoptysis, and pneumothorax were associated with ICU admission; whereas older age, performance status 3-4, metastatic disease, and request at night were associated with denial of ICU admission. The NEWS, and the qSOFA score in patients with suspected infection, determined at triage performed poorly for predicting hospital mortality (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, 0.52 and 0.62, respectively). Performance status 3-4 was independently associated with higher 6-month mortality and first-line anticancer treatment with lower 6-month mortality. Hospital mortality was 33.3% in patients admitted to the ICU after refusal of the first request. CONCLUSION: Patients with SM were frequently denied ICU admission despite excellent in-ICU survival. Poor performance status was associated with ICU admission denial and higher 6-month mortality, but none of the other reasons for denying ICU admission predicted 6-month mortality. Physiological scores had limited usefulness in this setting.

Comparing the Predictive Value of SOFA and SIRS for Mortality in the Early Hours of Hospitalization of Sepsis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis, a deadly infection causing organ failure and Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS), is detected early in hospitalization using the SIRS criteria, while sequential organ failure (SOFA) assesses organ failure severity. A systematic review and meta-analysis was evaluated to investigate the predictive value of the SIRS criteria and the SOFA system for mortality in early hospitalization of sepsis patients. METHODS: Inclusion criteria were full reports in peer-reviewed journals with data on sepsis assessment using SOFA and SIRS, and their relationship with outcomes. For quality assessment, we considered study population, sepsis diagnosis criteria, and outcomes. The area under the curve (AUC) of these criteria was extracted for separate meta-analysis and forest plots. RESULTS: Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria. The studies included an average of 56.1% males and a mean age of 61.9 (±6.1) among 32,979 patients. The pooled AUC was 0.67 (95% CI: 0.60-0.73) for SIRS and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.73-0.84) for SOFA. Significant heterogeneity between studies was indicated by an I2 above 50%, leading to a meta-regression analysis. This analysis, with age and patient number as moderators, revealed age as the major cause of heterogeneity in comparing the predictive value of the SOFA score with SIRS regarding the in-hospital mortality of sepsis patients (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: The SOFA score outperformed the SIRS criteria in predicting mortality, emphasizing the need for a holistic approach that combines clinical judgment and other diagnostic tools for better patient management and outcomes.

Association between base excess and mortality in critically ill patients with ischemic stroke: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Base excess (BE) is associated with mortality from many diseases. However, the relationship between BE and mortality in patients with ischemic stroke remains uncertain. Our aim is to investigate the relationship between BE values upon admission to the ICU and mortality rates in critically ill stroke patients. METHODS: The current study enrolled 1,572 patients with ischemic stroke (863 males and 709 females). The associations of BE with intensive care unit (ICU), hospital, 28-day, and 1-year mortalities were assessed using multivariable logistic regression or Cox proportional hazards model. The potential impact of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (< 5 or ≥ 5) on the prognostic value of BE was further evaluated with interaction and subgroup analyses. RESULTS: BE values less than - 3 mmol/L, greater than 3 mmol/L, and within - 3 to 3 mmol/L (normal BE) were observed in 316 (20.1%), 175 (11.1%), and 1,081 (68.8%) patients, respectively. The restricted cubic splines analyses revealed that a U-shaped curve between BE and the mortality risk. Multivariable analysis indicated that patients with low BE (<-3 mmol/L) had higher rates of ICU mortality (odds ratio [OR], 1.829; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.281-2.612; P = 0.001), hospital mortality (OR, 1.484; 95% CI, 1.077-2.045; P = 0.016), 28-day mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.522; 95% CI, 1.200-1.929; P = 0.001), and 1-year mortality (HR, 1.399; 95% CI, 1.148-1.705; P = 0.001) than patients with normal BE. Subgroup analyses showed consistent results pertaining to SOFA scores ≥ 5. CONCLUSIONS: In critically ill patients with ischemic stroke, an initial BE of <-3 mmol/L at ICU admission may indicate an increased risk of ICU, hospital, 28-day, and 1-year mortalities.

Comparison of different intensive care scoring systems and Glasgow Aneurysm score for aortic aneurysm in predicting 28-day mortality: a retrospective cohort study from MIMIC-IV database.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the performance of various scoring systems in predicting the 28-day mortality of patients with aortic aneurysms (AA) admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: We utilized data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV (MIMIC-IV) to perform a comparative analysis of various predictive systems, including the Glasgow Aneurysm Score (GAS), Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) III, SAPS II, Logical Organ Dysfunction System (LODS), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS), and The Oxford Acute Illness Severity Score (OASIS). The discrimination abilities of these systems were compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Additionally, a 4-knotted restricted cubic spline regression was employed to evaluate the association between the different scoring systems and the risk of 28-day mortality. Finally, we conducted a subgroup analysis focusing on patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). RESULTS: This study enrolled 586 patients with AA (68.39% male). Among them, 26 patients (4.4%) died within 28 days. Comparative analysis revealed higher SAPS II, SAPS III, SOFA, LODS, OASIS, and SIRS scores in the deceased group, while no statistically significant difference was observed in GAS scores between the survivor and deceased groups (P = 0.148). The SAPS III system exhibited superior predictive value for the 28-day mortality rate (AUROC 0.805) compared to the LODS system (AUROC 0.771), SOFA (AUROC 0.757), SAPS II (AUROC 0.759), OASIS (AUROC 0.742), SIRS (AUROC 0.638), and GAS (AUROC 0.586) systems. The results of the univariate and multivariate logistic analyses showed that SAPS III was statistically significant for both 28-day and 1-year mortality. Subgroup analyses yielded results consistent with the overall findings. No nonlinear relationship was identified between these scoring systems and 28-day all-cause mortality (P for nonlinear > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The SAPS III system demonstrated superior discriminatory ability for both 28-day and 1-year mortality compared to the GAS, SAPS II SIRS, SOFA, and OASIS systems among patients with AA.

Phoenix criteria for sepsis: are these enough to guide a clinician?

Sepsis is the leading cause of mortality in children worldwide. There is a paucity of data on the criteria used to define sepsis and septic shock and predict mortality. Schlapbach et al. published Phoenix criteria to define sepsis in JAMA in 2024. Previously, paediatricians have used systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria, but these criteria lack sensitivity and specificity. This group recommends that sepsis in children be identified by a Phoenix Sepsis Score of at least 2 points in children with suspected infection, which indicates potentially life-threatening dysfunction of the respiratory, cardiovascular, coagulation, and/or neurological systems. Though included in the 8-point criteria, important criteria like renal and liver are missing from the main criteria. We remain worried about the way these criteria got excluded from the main criteria. Therefore, in this brief report, whilst commending the authors for this stelar task, we highlight the main pitfalls in these criteria especially the renal, neurologic, and liver criteria. These criteria have been shown to be independently associated with outcomes, and we recommend that in the future iterations of the criteria, renal and liver criteria should be defined according to latest definitions and the task force consider utilizing latest criteria for each organ system involved within the formulated criteria. CONCLUSION:  In conclusion, Phoenix criteria are a step in the right direction to define life-threatening organ dysfunction in sepsis, but clinicians need to be mindful that diagnosis/treatment of less severe sepsis should not be delayed if these criteria are not met. Therefore, local early detection and management tools for sepsis should be followed. WHAT IS KNOWN: • There has always been a quest for a definition for pediatric sepsis. There are limitations to the previous pediatric sepsis criteria which were published in 2005 by the International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference (IPSCC). IPSCC defines sepsis as a suspected or confirmed infection in the presence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). These new Phoenix Pediatric Sepsis (PPS) criteria for sepsis and septic shock are intended to identify children with life-threatening organ dysfunction due to infection, and the score was developed based on a very large pediatric dataset. WHAT IS NEW: • Though the intention of Phoenix criteria is to help identify children with life threatening organ dysfunction, unfortunately the crietria will miss signs of early sepis. In this manuscript, we point out some of the drawbacks of these criteria which need to be borne in mind while applying these criteria.

Comparison of Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS), Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) for early prediction of septic shock in diabetic patients in Emergency Departments.

INTRODUCTION: Sepsis is a severe medical condition that can be life-threatening. If sepsis progresses to septic shock, the mortality rate increases to around 40%, much higher than the 10% mortality observed in sepsis. Diabetes increases infection and sepsis risk, making management complex. Various scores of screening tools, such as Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS), Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score (SOFA), and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II), are used to predict the severity or mortality rate of disease. Our study aimed to compare the effectiveness and optimal cutoff points of these scores. We focused on the early prediction of septic shock in patients with diabetes in the Emergency Department (ED). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study to collect data on patients with diabetes. We collected prediction factors and MEWS, SOFA, SAPS II and APACHE II scores to predict septic shock in these patients. We determined the optimal cutoff points for each score. Subsequently, we compared the identified scores with the gold standard for diagnosing septic shock by applying the Sepsis-3 criteria. RESULTS: Systolic blood pressure (SBP), peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), pH, and lactate concentrations were significant predictors of septic shock (p < 0.001). The SOFA score performed well in predicting septic shock in patients with diabetes. The area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve for the SOFA score was 0.866 for detection within 48 h and 0.840 for detection after 2 h of admission to the ED, with the optimal cutoff score of ≥ 6. CONCLUSION: SBP, SpO2, GCS, pH, and lactate concentrations are crucial for the early prediction of septic shock in patients with diabetes. The SOFA score is a superior predictor for the onset of septic shock in patients with diabetes compared with MEWS, SAPS II, and APACHE II scores. Specifically, a cutoff of ≥ 6 in the SOFA score demonstrates high accuracy in predicting shock within 48 h post-ED visit and as early as 2 h after ED admission.

Is it possible to predict persistent acute kidney injury in critically ill patients with COVID-19 infection?

INTRODUCTION: Critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) often face a heightened risk of morbidity and mortality, particularly due to complications such as acute kidney injury (AKI). While the persistent acute kidney injury risk index (PARI) has shown promise in predicting the risk of persistent AKI (pAKI) in non-COVID patients, its effectiveness in critically ill COVID-19 patients remains to be explored. We aimed to evaluate the predictive power of the PARI in identifying pAKI and its prognostic significance in terms of clinical outcomes. METHODOLOGY: This was a single-center retrospective study of patients with COVID-19 admitted at our 36-bed tertiary intensive care unit between April and December 2020. RESULTS: There were 152 patients who fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Fifty seven (37.5%) had developed AKI and 16 (10.25%) had developed pAKI. Vasopressor, mechanical ventilation and renal replacement therapy (RRT) requirement, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), and PARI were significantly higher in patients who developed pAKI than those who did not. The PARI were significantly higher in patients with short-term mortality compared to survivors. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of the PARI score for predicting pAKI was 0.66 (95% CI: 0.53-0.79), whereas short-term mortality was 0.733 (95% CI, 0.65-0.81). CONCLUSIONS: The PARI score was evaluated as simple, useful, and reliable in predicting pAKI in severe cases with COVID-19; and therefore, pAKI and its related RRT complications can be prevented with protective interventions. Further comprehensive studies are warranted to deepen our understanding of this relationship.

Validation of necrotising infection clinical composite endpoint in a retrospective cohort of patients with necrotising soft tissue infections.

Introduction: Rapidly progressive necrotising soft tissue infections (NSTIs) are associated with high mortality and morbidity. Low incidence and disease heterogeneity contribute to low event rates and inadequately powered studies. The Necrotising Infections Clinical Composite Endpoint (NICCE) provides a binary outcome with which to assess interventions for NSTIs. Partly with a view towards studies of hyperbaric oxygen treatment in NSTIs we aimed to validate NICCE in a retrospective cohort of NSTI patients. Methods: Eligible patients were admitted between 2012 and 2021 to an adult major referral hospital in Victoria, Australia with surgically confirmed NSTI. The NICCE and its constituents were assessed in the whole cohort (n = 235). The cohort was divided into two groups using the modified sequential organ failure assessment (mSOFA) score, with an admission mSOFA score ≥ 3 defined as high acuity. Results: Baseline characteristics of the whole (n = 235), the high (n = 188) and the low acuity cohorts (n = 47) were similar. Survival rates were high (91.1%). Patients with an admission mSOFA ≥ 3 were less likely to meet NICCE criteria for 'success' compared to the lower acuity cohort (34.1% and 64.7% respectively). Meeting NICCE criteria was significantly associated with lower resource utilisation, measured by intensive care unit days, ventilator days, and hospital length of stay for all patients and for those with high acuity on presentation. Conclusions: The NICCE provides greater discriminative ability than mortality alone. It accurately selects patients at high risk of adverse outcomes, thereby enhancing feasibility of trials. Adaptation of NICCE to include patient-centred outcomes could strengthen its clinical relevance.

Analysis of the diagnostic value of coagulation markers and coagulation function indices on the occurrence of DIC in sepsis and its prognosis.

Sepsis is a life-threatening condition that has the potential to multiple organ dysfunction and mortality. One of its frequent complications is disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), characterized by hyperactive clotting mechanisms that cause widespread clot formation and tissue damage. This study aimed to investigate early diagnostic markers of sepsis-associated DIC by comparing inflammatory factor levels, 28-day survival rates, coagulation function, and markers between patients with sepsis (non-DIC group) and those with sepsis-induced DIC (DIC group). The study analyzed the diagnostic efficacy of coagulation function and markers in predicting the occurrence and prognosis of sepsis-associated DIC, presenting survival curves. Results indicated significantly increased levels of APTT, TAT, tPAIC, PIC, and sTM in the DIC group compared to the non-DIC group. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores on days 1, 3, and 7 were notably lower in the non-DIC group. Correlation analysis revealed positive associations between PT, APTT, TAT, tPAIC, PIC, sTM levels, and SOFA scores, as well as negative associations with Fib and SOFA scores. Survival curves showed substantially lower mortality rates in the non-DIC group, highlighting significant survival disparities between groups. Combining all four coagulation indicators (TAT+ tPAIC + PIC + sTM) showed promising diagnostic value in evaluating disease severity, early DIC diagnosis, and sepsis prognosis.

Iloprost and Organ Dysfunction in Adults With Septic Shock and Endotheliopathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Soluble thrombomodulin is a marker of endotheliopathy, and iloprost may improve endothelial function. In patients with septic shock, high plasma levels of soluble thrombomodulin (>10 ng/mL) have been associated with worse organ dysfunction and mortality. Objective: To assess the effects of treatment with iloprost vs placebo on the severity of organ failure in patients with septic shock and plasma levels of soluble thrombomodulin higher than 10 ng/mL. Design, Setting, and Participants: This investigator-initiated, adaptive, parallel group, stratified, double-blind randomized clinical trial was conducted between November 1, 2019, and July 5, 2022, at 6 hospitals in Denmark. The trial had a maximum sample size of 380, with an interim analysis for futility only at 200 patients with 90 days of follow-up. In total, 279 adults in the intensive care unit (ICU) with septic shock and endotheliopathy were included. Interventions: Patients were randomized 1:1 to masked intravenous infusion of iloprost, 1 ng/kg/min (n = 142), or placebo (n = 137) for 72 hours. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was mean daily Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score in the ICU adjusted for trial site and baseline SOFA score for the per-protocol population. SOFA scores for each of the 5 organ systems ranged from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating more severe dysfunction (maximum score, 20). The secondary outcomes included serious adverse reactions and serious adverse events at 7 days and mortality at 90 days. Results: Of 279 randomized patients, data from 278 were analyzed (median [IQR] age, 69 [58-77] years; 171 (62%) male), 142 in the iloprost group and 136 in the placebo group. The trial was stopped for futility at the planned interim analysis. The mean [IQR] daily SOFA score was 10.6 (6.4-14.8) in the iloprost group and 10.5 (5.9-15.5) in the placebo group (adjusted mean difference, 0.2 [95% CI, -0.8 to 1.2]; P = .70). Mortality at 90 days in the iloprost group was 57% (81 of 142) vs 51% (70 of 136) in the placebo group (adjusted relative risk, 1.12 [95% CI, 0.91-1.40]; P = .33). Serious adverse events occurred in 26 of 142 patients (18%) for the iloprost group vs 20 of 136 patients (15%) for the placebo group (adjusted relative risk, 1.25 [95% CI, 0.73-2.15]; P = .52). Only 1 serious adverse reaction was observed. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of adults in the ICU with septic shock and severe endotheliopathy, infusion of iloprost, 1 ng/kg/min, for 72 hours did not reduce mean daily SOFA scores compared with placebo. In a clinical context, administration of iloprost will be unlikely to improve outcome in these patients. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04123444.

Contributions of individual qSOFA elements to assessment of severity and for prediction of mortality.

BACKGROUND: The quick sequential [sepsis-related] organ failure assessment (qSOFA) acts as a prompt to consider possible sepsis. The contributions of individual qSOFA elements to assessment of severity and for prediction of mortality remain unknown. METHODS: A total of 3974 patients with community-acquired pneumonia were recruited to an observational prospective cohort study. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), odds ratio, relative risk and Youden's index were employed to assess discrimination. RESULTS: Respiratory rate ≥22/min demonstrated the most superior diagnostic value, indicated by largest odds ratio, relative risk and AUROC, and maximum Youden's index for mortality. However, the indices for altered mentation and systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≤100 mm Hg decreased notably in turn. The predictive validities of respiratory rate ≥22/min, altered mentation and SBP ≤100 mm Hg were good, adequate and poor for mortality, indicated by AUROC (0.837, 0.734 and 0.671, respectively). Respiratory rate ≥22/min showed the strongest associations with SOFA scores, pneumonia severity index, hospital length of stay and costs. However, SBP ≤100 mm Hg was most weakly correlated with the indices. CONCLUSIONS: Respiratory rate ≥22/min made the greatest contribution to parsimonious qSOFA to assess severity and predict mortality. However, the contributions of altered mentation and SBP ≤100 mm Hg decreased strikingly in turn. It is the first known prospective evidence of the contributions of individual qSOFA elements to assessment of severity and for prediction of mortality, which might have implications for more accurate clinical triage decisions.

Respiratory rate ≥22/min demonstrated the most superior diagnostic value.Respiratory rate ≥22/min showed the strongest association with severity.Respiratory rate ≥22/min, altered mentation and SBP ≤100 mm Hg predicted mortality well, adequately and poorly, respectively.

Role of arterial blood glucose and interstitial fluid glucose difference in evaluating microcirculation and clinical prognosis of patients with septic shock: a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Microcirculation abnormality in septic shock is closely associated with organ dysfunction and mortality rate. It was hypothesized that the arterial blood glucose and interstitial fluid (ISF) glucose difference (GA-I) as a marker for assessing the microcirculation status can effectively evaluate the severity of microcirculation disturbance in patients with septic shock. METHODS: The present observational study enrolled patients with septic shock admitted to and treated in the intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary teaching hospital. The parameters reflecting organ and tissue perfusion, including lactic acid (Lac), skin mottling score, capillary refill time (CRT), venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference (Pv-aCO2), urine volume, central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) and GA-I of each enrolled patient were recorded at the time of enrollment (H0), H2, H4, H6, and H8. With ICU mortality as the primary outcome measure, the ICU mortality rate at any GA-I interval was analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 43 septic shock patients were included, with median sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores of 10.5 (6-16), and median Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHAE) II scores of 25.7 (9-40), of whom 18 died during ICU stay. The GA-I levels were negative correlation with CRT (r = 0.369, P < 0.001), Lac (r = -0.269, P < 0.001), skin mottling score (r=-0.223, P < 0.001), and were positively associated with urine volume (r = 0.135, P < 0.05). The ICU mortality rate of patients with septic shock presenting GA-I ≤ 0.30 mmol/L and ≥ 2.14 mmol/L was significantly higher than that of patients with GA-I at 0.30-2.14 mmol/L [65.2% vs. 15.0%, odds ratio (OR) = 10.625, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.355-47.503]. CONCLUSION: GA-I was correlated with microcirculation parameters, and with differences in survival. Future studies are needed to further explore the potential impact of GA-I on microcirculation and clinical prognosis of septic shock, and the bedside monitoring of GA-I may be beneficial for clinicians to identify high-risk patients.

Determining Outcomes in Nonpenetrating Trauma With qSOFA.

INTRODUCTION: The quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score identifies patients with suspected infection at high risk for adverse outcomes. The qSOFA score is the sum of three variables (respiratory rate, systolic blood pressure, and Glasgow Coma Score) with binary thresholds. The role of qSOFA in predicting hospitalization outcomes in nonpenetrating trauma patients was determined at a level 1 and a level 2 trauma center. METHODS: The trauma registries at the two institutions were queried for adult (18+ y) and pediatric (0-17 y) nonpenetrating trauma hospitalizations between January 1, 2019 and September 30, 2021. RESULTS: At institution A, there were 3720 adult hospitalizations (qSOFA = 0: 2906 patients, qSOFA = 1: 677, qSOFA = 2: 124, qSOFA = 3: 13) and 418 pediatric hospitalizations (qSOFA = 0: 238 patients, qSOFA = 1: 159, qSOFA = 2: 20, qSOFA = 3: 1). At institution B, there were 3579 adult hospitalizations (qSOFA = 0: 2638 patients, qSOFA = 1: 816, qSOFA = 2: 121, qSOFA = 3: 4) and 429 pediatric hospitalizations (qSOFA = 0: 273 patients, qSOFA = 1: 149, qSOFA = 2: 6, qSOFA = 3: 1). In adults at both institutions, increased qSOFA was significantly associated with higher mortality rates. Intensive care unit (ICU) admission increased at institution A and increased at institution B to qSOFA = 2. In multivariable analyses, qSOFA predicted ICU admission and mortality. Pediatric patients had low injury severity, morbidity, and mortality. Excluding the one early qSOFA = 3 mortality, higher qSOFA scores were associated with increased ICU admission in pediatric patients. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated qSOFA scores are associated with ICU admission and mortality in adult nonpenetrating trauma patients. Further investigation on qSOFA for resource allocation is indicated.

THE IMPACT OF SCHISTOCYTE DETECTION ON MORTALITY AND ORGAN FAILURE IN PATIENTS WITH SEPSIS.

ABSTRACT: Purpose : This study aimed to investigate the presence of schistocytes in patients with sepsis and its association with mortality and organ failure. Methods : We conducted a retrospective observational study at Shiga University of Medical Science Hospital, Japan, from January 2015 to April 2021. This study included patients diagnosed with sepsis or septic shock. Schistocytes were identified through daily hematological examinations. Moreover, data on mortality rates and organ failure based on Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores were systematically collected and analyzed. Results : Schistocytes were detected in 41 of the 330 patients with sepsis. The presence of schistocytes was associated with significantly high 90-day and 1-year mortality rates (48.7% and 68.2%, respectively; P < 0.001). Patients with schistocytes exhibited higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores, particularly in the coagulation and renal components, indicating more severe organ failure than that observed in patients without schistocytes. These findings persisted even after adjusting for confounding factors, such as age, sex, and baseline comorbidities. Additionally, we observed that patients with schistocytes required frequent red blood cells, further highlighting the severity of their conditions. Conclusion : Schistocytes are significantly associated with increased long-term mortality and organ failure in patients with sepsis. Their detection may provide crucial insights into disease severity, guide targeted therapeutic strategies, and potentially improve the long-term outcomes of sepsis management.

COMPARISON OF OXIRIS AND CONVENTIONAL CONTINUOUS RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY IN MANAGING SEVERE ABDOMINAL INFECTIONS: IMPACT ON SEPTIC SHOCK MORTALITY.

ABSTRACT: Objective: The objective of this study is to assess and compare the efficacy of oXiris with conventional continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in managing severe abdominal infections. Methods: A retrospective analysis encompassing cases from 2017 to 2023 was conducted at the Department of Critical Care Medicine within the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University. Parameters including heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), oxygenation index, lactate (Lac), platelet count, neutrophil ratio, procalcitonin, C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin 6 (IL-6), norepinephrine dosage, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) were recorded prior to treatment initiation, at 24 h, and 72 h after treatment for both the oXiris and conventional CRRT groups. In addition, the duration of respiratory support, CRRT treatment, length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU), total hospitalization period, and mortality rates at 14 and 28 days for both groups were recorded. Results: 1) Within the conventional CRRT group, notable enhancement was observed solely in Lac levels at 24 h after treatment compared with pretreatment levels. In addition, at 72 h after treatment, improvements were evident in HR, Lac, CRP, and IL-6 levels. 2) Conversely, the oXiris group exhibited improvements in HR, MAP, Lac, oxygenation index, neutrophil ratio, and IL-6 at 24 h after treatment when compared with baseline values. In addition, reductions were observed in APACHE II and SOFA scores. At 72 h after treatment, all parameters demonstrated enhancement except for platelet count. 3) Analysis of the changes in the indexes (Δ) between the two groups at 24 h after treatment revealed variances in HR, MAP, Lac, norepinephrine dosage, CRP levels, IL-6 levels, APACHE II scores, and SOFA scores. 4) The Δ indexes at 72 h after treatment indicated more significant improvements following oXiris treatment for both groups, except for procalcitonin. 5) The 14-day mortality rate (24.4%) exhibited a significant reduction in the oXiris group when compared with the conventional group (43.6%). However, no significant difference was observed in the 28-day mortality rate between the two groups. 6) Subsequent to multifactorial logistic regression analysis, the results indicated that oXiris treatment correlated with a noteworthy decrease in the 14-day and 28-day mortality rates associated with severe abdominal infections, by 71.3% and 67.6%, respectively. Conclusion: oXiris demonstrates clear advantages over conventional CRRT in the management of severe abdominal infections. Notably, it reduces the fatality rates, thereby establishing itself as a promising and potent therapeutic option.

Ulinastatin shortens the length of ICU stay in critical patients with organ failure: A 7-year real-world study.

BACKGROUND: Ulinastatin has been applied in a series of diseases associated with inflammation but its clinical effects remain somewhat elusive. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the potential effects of ulinastatin on organ failure patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective study on organ failure patients from 2013 to 2019. Patients were divided into two groups according to using ulinastatin or not during hospitalization. Propensity score matching was applied to reduce bias. The outcomes of interest were 28-day all-cause mortality, length of ICU stay, and mechanical ventilation duration. RESULTS: Of the 841 patients who fulfilled the entry criteria, 247 received ulinastatin. A propensity-matched cohort of 608 patients was created. No significant differences in 28-day mortality between the two groups. Sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) was identified as the independent risk factor associated with mortality. In the subgroup with SOFA ≤ 10, patients received ulinastatin experienced significantly shorter time in ICU (10.0 d [interquartile range, IQR: 7.0∼20.0] vs 15.0 d [IQR: 7.0∼25.0]; p = .004) and on mechanical ventilation (222 h [IQR:114∼349] vs 251 h [IQR: 123∼499]; P = .01), but the 28-day mortality revealed no obvious difference (10.5% vs 9.4%; p = .74). CONCLUSION: Ulinastatin was beneficial in treating patients in ICU with organ failure, mainly by reducing the length of ICU stay and duration of mechanical ventilation.

Exploring Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: Microbial Clues and Biomarker Insights from a Retrospective Study.

Background and Objectives: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a common complication in critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation. The incidence rates of VAP vary, and it poses significant challenges due to microbial resistance and the potential for adverse outcomes. This study aims to explore the microbial profile of VAP and evaluate the utility of biomarkers and illness severity scores in predicting survival. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 130 patients diagnosed with VAP. Microbial analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid, as well as measurements of C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) levels, were performed. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scores were calculated to assess illness severity. Statistical analyses were conducted to determine correlations and associations. Results: The study revealed that Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) (50.7%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) (27.69%) were the most identified microorganisms in VAP cases. SOFA (p-value < 0.0001) and APACHE II (p-value < 0.0001) scores were effective in assessing the severity of illness and predicting mortality in VAP patients. Additionally, our investigation highlighted the prognostic potential of CRP levels (odds ratio [OR]: 0.980, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.968 to 0.992, p = 0.001). Elevated levels of CRP were associated with reduced survival probabilities in VAP patients. Conclusion: This study highlights the microbial profile of VAP and the importance of biomarkers and illness severity scores in predicting survival. Conclusions: The findings emphasize the need for appropriate management strategies to combat microbial resistance and improve outcomes in VAP patients.

Prediction of Mortality Using the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients.

OBJECTIVE:  To determine the accuracy and reliability of the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score in predicting the risk of mortality in ICU-admitted COVID-19 patients. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. Place and Duration of the Study: COVID Intensive Care Unit (ICU), The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, from January to June 2022. METHODOLOGY: A total of 62 patients with a positive RT-PCR for COVID-19, admitted into the intensive care unit (ICU), were included in this descriptive cross-sectional study. Written informed consent was obtained after explaining the risks and benefits of the study to the patients / next of kin. SOFA score at the time of admission and 48 hours after admission was calculated. The outcome variable, i.e., mortality, was assessed in association with the SOFA score.  Results: The study had a predominantly male population of 54.8% (n = 34). The SOFA score >7 at admission and 48 hours after admission was observed in 46.8% (n = 29) patients. Among 62 COVID-19 patients, the majority were found to have a severe nature of the disease, i.e., 69.4% (n = 43), followed by moderate / mild cases 30.6% (n = 19). Depending on the requirement of the patient, 74.2% (n = 46) were invasively ventilated while 77.4% (n = 48) were on non-invasive ventilation. Overall the mortality rate of the present study was 43.5% (n = 27). The scores both at the time of admission and 48 hours after admission for the survivors had a significant difference (p = 0.001) with the non-survivors. CONCLUSION:  The SOFA score on admission and 48 hours after had a significant positive association with the severity of COVID-19 infection and its risk of mortality. KEY WORDS: COVID-19, Mortality prediction, SOFA score.

Acute Kidney Injury in COVID-19 Pneumonia Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.

This retrospective study was conducted at the Izmir Tepecik Training and Research Hospital from January 2020 to December 2021. It aimed to determine acute kidney injury (AKI) frequency and associated factors in critically ill COVID-19 patients. Out of 177 patients, 49.7% developed AKI, with an average onset of 7.63 days. AKI stages varied, and progression occurred in 27 patients within 48 hours. ICU and hospital mortality rates were significantly higher in AKI patients (86.4% and 92%, respectively) compared to non-AKI patients (19.1% and 22.5%). The study highlights age, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, and nephrotoxic agent presence as significant factors influencing AKI development in COVID-19 patients. Key Words: Critical care unit, COVID-19, Acute kidney failure.