Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 343
Filter
1.
Zhonghua Yi Shi Za Zhi ; 54(4): 234-239, 2024 Jul 28.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39394796

ABSTRACT

The Interim Regulations on Chinese Medicine Shops and Western Pharmacy Registration issued by the Shanghai Bureau of Illegal Drugs in 1922, required that Chinese medicine shops in Shanghai area be audited, registered and pay registration fees. This regulation was abolished along with the dissolution of the Shanghai Bureau of Illegal Drugs in 1925. The Interim Regulations on Chinese Medicine Shops and Western Pharmacy Registration drove people, to some extent, to attach the importance and awareness of Chinese medicine and its administration. While it had some problems, such as improper intention and unclear concepts in the period of the Republic of China, a sound system for traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) administration had not been established. It confirmed that Chinese materia medica has its unique knowledge system and development form, therefore, should not be uniformly administered as Western medicine. It indicated that TCM pharmacy administration should have a reasonable system and channels to promote the development of the Chinese materia medica industry.


Subject(s)
Medicine, Chinese Traditional , China , Medicine, Chinese Traditional/history , History, 20th Century , Drugs, Chinese Herbal/history , Humans , Pharmacies/history , Pharmacies/legislation & jurisprudence
2.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 993, 2024 Aug 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39192253

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: While successful information transfer and seamless medication supply are fundamental to medication safety during hospital-to-home transitions, disruptions are frequently reported. In Germany, new legal requirements came into force in 2017, strengthening medication lists and discharge summaries as preferred means of information transfer. In addition to previous regulations - such as dispensing medication at discharge by hospital pharmacies - hospital physicians were now allowed to issue discharge prescriptions to be supplied by community pharmacies. The aim of this survey study was to gain first nationwide insights into how these requirements are implemented and how they impact the continuity of medication information transfer and continuous medication supply. METHODS: Two nationwide self-administered online surveys of all hospital and community pharmacies across Germany were developed and conducted from April 17th to June 30th, 2023. RESULTS: Overall, 31.0% (n = 111) of all German hospital pharmacies and 4.5% (n = 811) of all community pharmacies participated. The majority of those hospital pharmacies reported that patients who were discharged were typically provided with discharge summaries (89.2%), medication lists (59.5%) and if needed, discharge prescriptions (67.6%) and/or required medication (67.6%). About every second community pharmacy (49.0%) indicated that up to half of the recently discharged patients who came to their pharmacy typically presented medication lists. 34.0% of the community pharmacies stated that they typically received a discharge summary from recently discharged patients at least once per week. About three in four community pharmacies (73.3%) indicated that most discharge prescriptions were dispensed in time. However, one-third (31.0%) estimated that half and more of the patients experienced gaps in medication supply. Community pharmacies reported challenges with the legal requirements - such as patients´ poor comprehensibility of medication lists, medication discrepancies, unmet formal requirements of discharge prescriptions, and poor accessibility of hospital staff in case of queries. In comparison, hospital pharmacies named technical issues, time/personnel resources, and deficits in patient knowledge of medication as difficulties. CONCLUSION: According to the pharmacies´ perceptions, it can be assumed that discontinuation in medication information transfer and lack of medication supply still occur today during hospital-to-home transitions, despite the new legal requirements. Further research is necessary to supplement these results by the perspectives of other healthcare professionals and patients in order to identify efficient strategies.


Subject(s)
Continuity of Patient Care , Patient Discharge , Pharmacy Service, Hospital , Germany , Humans , Surveys and Questionnaires , Community Pharmacy Services/legislation & jurisprudence , Medication Reconciliation , Pharmacies/legislation & jurisprudence
6.
Obstet Gynecol ; 138(6): 871-877, 2021 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34735383

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess pharmacy participation in and accessibility of pharmacist-prescribed contraception after legislation effective in the state of Utah in 2019. METHODS: A secret-shopper telephone survey was used to assess participation in pharmacist-prescribed contraception. Geospatial analysis was used to map the distribution of participating pharmacies by population characteristics. RESULTS: Of all operating Class A retail pharmacies in Utah, 127 (27%) were providing pharmacist-prescribed contraception 1 year after implementation of the Utah standing order. Oral contraceptive pills were widely accessible (100%); however, other allowed methods were not (vaginal ring 14%; contraceptive patch 2%). Consultation fees and medication costs varied widely. Participating pharmacies were mainly concentrated in population centers. Assuming access to a personal vehicle, urban areas with a high percentage of Hispanic people (Utah's largest minority race or ethnicity group) have access to a participating pharmacy within a 20-minute driving distance. However, access in rural areas with a high percentage Hispanic or other minority were limited. We identified 235 (40%) census tracts with a high proportion of Utah's residents living below the poverty line or of minority race or ethnicity who also had low access to pharmacist-prescribed contraception. CONCLUSIONS: Although the pharmacy-based model is intended to increase access to contraception, practical availability 1 year after the authorization of pharmacist-prescribed contraception in Utah suggests that this service does not adequately serve rural areas, particularly rural areas with a high proportion of minorities and those living below the federal poverty line.


Subject(s)
Contraception/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Pharmaceutical Services/statistics & numerical data , Pharmacists/statistics & numerical data , Pharmacy/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Drug Costs/statistics & numerical data , Female , Health Plan Implementation , Health Services Accessibility/legislation & jurisprudence , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pharmaceutical Services/legislation & jurisprudence , Pharmacies/legislation & jurisprudence , Pharmacies/statistics & numerical data , Poverty/statistics & numerical data , Referral and Consultation/economics , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Utah , Young Adult
8.
Addiction ; 116(1): 107-115, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32415706

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Injection drug use has increased in non-urban communities in the United States where sterile syringe access is limited. This study aimed to characterize how people who inject drugs in a predominantly rural state navigate syringe scarcity. DESIGN: Qualitative study. SETTING: New Hampshire (NH), USA. At the time of our study, syringe services programs were illegal in NH but pharmacies could sell ≤ 10 syringes without prescription. PARTICIPANTS/CASES: Twenty people aged ≥ 18 years who injected at least once in the past 30 days were recruited through provider referral, street-based recruitment and snowball sampling. MEASUREMENTS: Semi-structured interview guide. Verbatim transcripts were coded based on interview guide constructs and emergent themes. Analysis focused on pharmacy syringe access, unofficial syringe sources and related impacts on syringe sharing and reuse FINDINGS: Participants could identify no local pharmacies that sold syringes without prescription. Pharmacy purchase in neighboring counties, or across state lines, required private transportation and this, along with purchaser identification requirements, presented substantial access barriers. Interstate travel also exposed participants to vigilant policing of interstate highways and potential criminal justice involvement. Many participants thus resorted to informal syringe sources closer to home including purchasing syringes on the street, using discarded syringes, breaking into biohazard containers and constructing improvised syringes out of salvaged syringe parts, metals and plastics. Repeated re-use of syringes until they were no longer operational was common. Overall, syringe scarcity gave participants few options but to engage in syringe sharing and re-use, putting them at risk of serious injection-related infections. CONCLUSIONS: Limited sterile syringe access contributes to an environment in which people who inject drugs report that they are less able to refrain from risky injection practices.


Subject(s)
Drug Users/psychology , Needle Sharing/psychology , Syringes/supply & distribution , Adult , Female , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Male , Needle-Exchange Programs , New England , New Hampshire , Pharmacies/legislation & jurisprudence , Qualitative Research , Rural Population , Substance Abuse, Intravenous , Young Adult
9.
Ann Pharmacother ; 55(4): 549-555, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32787618

ABSTRACT

To fully engage in the Pharmacists' Patient Care Process, pharmacists must be able to (1) participate in a Collaborative Practice Agreement, (2) order and interpret laboratory tests, (3) prescribe certain medications, (4) adapt medications, (5) administer medications, and (6) effectively delegate tasks to support staff. Each of these activities is dependent on state scope of practice laws, but these laws are not binary. Various state-level restrictions allow us to view these activities on a continuum from more restrictive to less restrictive. This continuum will allow pharmacy and public health stakeholders to identify priorities for action in their states.


Subject(s)
Patient Care/trends , Pharmaceutical Services/trends , Pharmacies/trends , Pharmacists/trends , Professional Role , Cooperative Behavior , Humans , Patient Care/standards , Patient Care Team/standards , Patient Care Team/trends , Pharmaceutical Services/legislation & jurisprudence , Pharmaceutical Services/standards , Pharmacies/legislation & jurisprudence , Pharmacies/standards , Pharmacists/legislation & jurisprudence , Pharmacists/standards
10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33255672

ABSTRACT

Community pharmacies are the primary entities providing drugs to individual patients in Poland. The pharmacy market has been changing for many years due to significant changes in market regulations. These changes significantly affect the profitability of pharmacies, which may impact the quality of pharmacotherapy. The small number of pharmacies, which resulted from changes in the law in 2017, can influence the level of patient care. The article presents the community pharmacies market in Poland. Particular attention is paid to the legal regulations affecting community pharmacies and the impact of these regulations on the overall shape of the market. The Polish system's specificity, including the pharmacy market indicators, has been compared with data from other European Union countries.


Subject(s)
Drug and Narcotic Control , Pharmacies , Drug and Narcotic Control/legislation & jurisprudence , Drug and Narcotic Control/statistics & numerical data , Drug and Narcotic Control/trends , European Union/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Pharmacies/legislation & jurisprudence , Pharmacies/statistics & numerical data , Poland
11.
Hist Cienc Saude Manguinhos ; 27(3): 933-965, 2020.
Article in Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33111797

ABSTRACT

On November 5th, 1808, D. João de Bragança issued a license about the practice of druggists and the price of drugs and ordered the creation of a regulation to tax the cost of medicines marketed in Brazil. First published on 1809, the Regimento dos preços dos medicamentos... gained new editions in the following years and became an indispensable working tool for those involved in the making and trading of drugs at this time. This paper situates historically and sheds light on a document briefly explored by the researchers of the history of the Brazilian pharmacy, taking into account that it was one of the first initiatives of the Luso-Brazilian government in line with the pharmaceutical activity in Brazil in the nineteenth century.


Em 5 de novembro de 1808, dom João de Bragança promulgou um alvará sobre o exercício dos boticários e o preço das drogas e ordenou a criação de um regulamento para taxar o custo dos medicamentos comercializados no Brasil. Publicado pela primeira vez em 1809, o Regimento dos preços dos medicamentos... ganhou novas edições nos anos subsequentes e tornou-se um indispensável instrumento de trabalho para os envolvidos com a feitura e o comércio dos remédios. Este texto situa historicamente e destaca esse documento brevemente explorado pelos pesquisadores da história da farmácia brasileira, visto ter sido uma das primeiras iniciativas do governo luso-brasileiro condizentes com a atividade farmacêutica no Brasil no século XIX.


Subject(s)
Fees, Pharmaceutical/history , Pharmaceutical Services/history , Pharmacies/history , Taxes/history , Brazil , Fees, Pharmaceutical/legislation & jurisprudence , Government Regulation/history , History, 19th Century , Pharmaceutical Services/economics , Pharmaceutical Services/legislation & jurisprudence , Pharmacies/legislation & jurisprudence , Taxes/legislation & jurisprudence
12.
Hist. ciênc. saúde-Manguinhos ; Hist. ciênc. saúde-Manguinhos;27(3): 933-965, set. 2020. tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-1134070

ABSTRACT

Resumo Em 5 de novembro de 1808, dom João de Bragança promulgou um alvará sobre o exercício dos boticários e o preço das drogas e ordenou a criação de um regulamento para taxar o custo dos medicamentos comercializados no Brasil. Publicado pela primeira vez em 1809, o Regimento dos preços dos medicamentos... ganhou novas edições nos anos subsequentes e tornou-se um indispensável instrumento de trabalho para os envolvidos com a feitura e o comércio dos remédios. Este texto situa historicamente e destaca esse documento brevemente explorado pelos pesquisadores da história da farmácia brasileira, visto ter sido uma das primeiras iniciativas do governo luso-brasileiro condizentes com a atividade farmacêutica no Brasil no século XIX.


Abstract On November 5th, 1808, D. João de Bragança issued a license about the practice of druggists and the price of drugs and ordered the creation of a regulation to tax the cost of medicines marketed in Brazil. First published on 1809, the Regimento dos preços dos medicamentos... gained new editions in the following years and became an indispensable working tool for those involved in the making and trading of drugs at this time. This paper situates historically and sheds light on a document briefly explored by the researchers of the history of the Brazilian pharmacy, taking into account that it was one of the first initiatives of the Luso-Brazilian government in line with the pharmaceutical activity in Brazil in the nineteenth century.


Subject(s)
History, 19th Century , Pharmacies/history , Pharmaceutical Services/history , Taxes/history , Fees, Pharmaceutical/history , Pharmacies/legislation & jurisprudence , Pharmaceutical Services/economics , Pharmaceutical Services/legislation & jurisprudence , Taxes/legislation & jurisprudence , Brazil , Government Regulation/history , Fees, Pharmaceutical/legislation & jurisprudence
14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31956401

ABSTRACT

Background: Access to antibiotics without a prescription from retail pharmacies has been described as a major contributor to anti-microbial resistance (AMR) globally. In the context of high rates of AMR, the Chinese government has recently introduced strict policies regarding hospital antibiotic use, but the existing ban on antibiotic sales without prescription in retail pharmacies has not been strongly enforced. In 2016, a goal of prescription-only antibiotics by 2020 was announced. The objective of the study was to determine progress towards the 2020 goal, through estimating the proportion of retail pharmacies selling antibiotics without prescription across the three regions of mainland China. Methods: Using the Simulated Patient method, we conducted a cross-sectional survey across purposively-sampled retail pharmacies in urban and rural areas of 13 provinces in eastern, central and western China. Medical students presented a scenario of a mild upper respiratory tract infection, following a strict three-step protocol. They recorded the pharmacy characteristics, and details of their experience, including at which step antibiotics were offered. Results: Complete data were obtained from 1106 pharmacies. Antibiotics were obtained in 925 (83.6, 95% CI: 81.5, 85.8%) pharmacies without a prescription, 279 (25.2%) at Stage 1 (symptoms only described), 576 (52.1%) at stage 2 (asked for antibiotics), and 70 (6.3%) at Stage 3 (asked for penicillin or cephalosporins). There were significant differences between provinces, with antibiotic access (at any stage) ranging from 57.0% (57/100) in Zhejiang (81/82) to 98.8% in Guizhou. However, there were no significant differences in access to antibiotics by level of city, county, township or village (P = 0.25), whether the pharmacy was part of a chain or independent (P = 0.23), whether a licensed pharmacist was attending (P = 0.82) or whether there was a sign saying that prescriptions were required for antibiotics (P = 0.19). Conclusions: It is easy to obtain antibiotics without a prescription in retail pharmacies in China, despite the fact it is against the law. This must be addressed as part of the wider anti-microbial stewardship effort which could include intense enforcement of the existing law, supported by a public education campaign.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/supply & distribution , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Nonprescription Drugs/supply & distribution , Pharmacies , Anti-Bacterial Agents/economics , Cross-Sectional Studies , Drug Prescriptions , Female , Humans , Legislation, Drug , Male , Nonprescription Drugs/economics , Patient Simulation , Pharmacies/legislation & jurisprudence , Rural Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Urban Health/legislation & jurisprudence
15.
Res Social Adm Pharm ; 16(2): 190-194, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31118139

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pharmacy technicians are vital to the operation of pharmacies, and national pharmacy associations have advocated for mandatory education and training requirements. While these requirements may improve patient safety, there is a risk that laws and regulations which impose substantial education and training requirements on technicians could create barriers to entry which restrict the workforce and increase wages. OBJECTIVE: This study has two objectives: 1) Describe changes in barriers to entry and wages over time; and 2) Evaluate the correlation between changing barriers to entry and pharmacy technician wages. METHODS: Data come from Bureau of Labor Statistics Occupational Employment Statistics from 1997 to 2017 and National Association of Boards of Pharmacy Surveys of Pharmacy Law from 1997 to 2014. A barrier to entry was defined as adoption of registration, licensure, or certification. Wage data was adjusted to 2017 dollars using the Consumer Price Index. Ordinary least squares regression evaluated the correlation between the proportion of states which had at least one barrier to entry and wages. An interrupted time series model estimated the impact of adopting a barrier to entry on the trend in technician wages over time. RESULTS: Technician wages increased between 1997 and 2007 but remained flat between 2008 and 2017. A strong correlation was observed between the proportion of states which had at least one barrier to entry and technician wages (R2 = 0.93, p < 0.0001). However, the interrupted time series models did not identify any relationship between adoption of a barrier to entry and the trend in technician wages (p = 0.363). CONCLUSIONS: This research suggests adoption of legal/regulatory barriers to entry did not have a significant influence on the trend in technician wages over time. More research is needed to evaluate the impact of barriers to entry on non-wage practice variables, such as privileges and satisfaction.


Subject(s)
Certification/legislation & jurisprudence , Government Regulation , Legislation, Pharmacy , Pharmacies/legislation & jurisprudence , Pharmacy Technicians/legislation & jurisprudence , Salaries and Fringe Benefits/legislation & jurisprudence , Certification/standards , Humans , Pharmacies/standards , Pharmacy/standards , Pharmacy Technicians/standards
16.
Women Health ; 60(3): 249-259, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31264530

ABSTRACT

In 2013, California passed legislation to expand the scope of pharmacist practice, including authorizing pharmacists to prescribe hormonal contraception. Pharmacist-prescribed contraception was largely unavailable across the state in 2017. This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to offering this service in California independent pharmacies. To do so, we thematically analyzed qualitative data from structured interviews with 36 pharmacists working in independent pharmacies in 2016-17. We found that pharmacists anticipated general benefits from expanding their roles to prescribe contraception, including increasing health care access and decreasing costs. In contrast, described barriers were concrete, including lack of financial incentives and business risks for independent pharmacies. Specific barriers to prescribing hormonal contraception included time required to screen and counsel women about contraception and concerns that pharmacist-prescribed contraception would increase liability and lead to patients seeking health care less frequently. This study suggests that incentives and barriers identified by the respondents are likely to have varied and unequal impacts, with immediate barriers being potentially prohibitive for pharmacists to prescribe contraception. For independent pharmacies, perceived business risks and lack of insurance reimbursement may outweigh professional support for prescribing contraception, limiting the public health impact of legislation that should increase contraceptive access.


Subject(s)
Community Pharmacy Services/legislation & jurisprudence , Contraceptives, Oral/administration & dosage , Hormonal Contraception/statistics & numerical data , Pharmacists/legislation & jurisprudence , Attitude of Health Personnel , California , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Pharmacies/legislation & jurisprudence , Qualitative Research
17.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 76(23): 1934-1943, 2019 Nov 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31628792

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Many medications that were marketed prior to 1962 but lack Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval are prescribed in the United States. Usage patterns of these "unapproved medications" are poorly elucidated, which is concerning due to potential lack of data on safety and efficacy. The purpose of this project was to characterize purchases of unapproved medications within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) by type, frequency, and cost. METHODS: VHA purchasing databases were used to create a list of all products with National Drug Codes (NDCs) purchased nationwide in fiscal year 2016 (FY16). This list was compared to FDA databases to identify unapproved prescription medications. For each identified combination of active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) and route of administration ("API/route combination"), numbers of packages purchased and associated costs were added. RESULTS: VHA pharmacy purchasing records contained 3,299 unapproved products with NDCs in FY16. After excluding equipment, nutrition products, compounding ingredients, nonmedication products, and duplicate NDCs, there were 600 unique NDCs associated with 130 distinct API/route combinations. The most commonly acquired product was prescription sodium fluoride dental paste (350,775 packages). The greatest pharmaceutical expenditure was for sodium hyaluronate injection ($24.5 million). Unapproved products accounted for less than 1% of overall VHA pharmacy purchasing in FY16. CONCLUSION: VHA purchased many unapproved prescription products in FY16 but is taking action to address use of such products in consideration of safety and efficacy data and available alternatives.


Subject(s)
Drug Approval , Drug Utilization Review/statistics & numerical data , Pharmacies/statistics & numerical data , Prescription Drugs/economics , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/statistics & numerical data , Drug Utilization Review/economics , Drug Utilization Review/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Pharmacies/economics , Pharmacies/legislation & jurisprudence , United States , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/economics , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/legislation & jurisprudence , United States Food and Drug Administration/legislation & jurisprudence
18.
Harm Reduct J ; 16(1): 57, 2019 09 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31533730

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Community pharmacies are important for health access by rural populations and those who do not have optimum access to the health system, because they provide myriad health services and are found in most communities. This includes the sale of non-prescription syringes, a practice that is legal in the USA in all but two states. However, people who inject drugs (PWID) face significant barriers accessing sterile syringes, particularly in states without laws allowing syringe services programming. To our knowledge, no recent studies of pharmacy-based syringe purchase experience have been conducted in communities that are both rural and urban, and none in the Southwestern US. This study seeks to understand the experience of retail pharmacy syringe purchase in Arizona by PWID. METHODS: An interview study was conducted between August and December 2018 with 37 people living in 3 rural and 2 urban Arizona counties who identified as current or former users of injection drugs. Coding was both a priori and emergent, focusing on syringe access through pharmacies, pharmacy experiences generally, experiences of stigma, and recommendations for harm reduction services delivered by pharmacies. RESULTS: All participants reported being refused syringe purchase at pharmacies. Six themes emerged about syringe purchase: (1) experience of stigma and judgment by pharmacy staff, (2) feelings of internalized stigma, (3) inconsistent sales outcomes at the same pharmacy or pharmacy chain, (4) pharmacies as last resort for syringes, (5) fear of arrest for syringe possession, and (6) health risks resulting from syringe refusal. CONCLUSIONS: Non-prescription syringe sales in community pharmacies are a missed opportunity to improve the health of PWID by reducing syringe sharing and reuse. Yet, current pharmacy syringe sales refusal and stigmatization by staff suggest that pharmacy-level interventions will be necessary to impact pharmacy practice. Lack of access to sterile syringes reinforces health risk behaviors among PWID. Retail syringe sales at pharmacies remain an important, yet barrier-laden, element of a comprehensive public health response to reduce HIV and hepatitis C among PWID. Future studies should test multilevel evidence-based interventions to decrease staff discrimination and stigma and increase syringe sales.


Subject(s)
Group Purchasing/legislation & jurisprudence , Harm Reduction , Needle Sharing/legislation & jurisprudence , Pharmacies/legislation & jurisprudence , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/rehabilitation , Syringes/supply & distribution , Adult , Aged , Arizona , Female , HIV Infections/prevention & control , HIV Infections/transmission , Health Services Accessibility/legislation & jurisprudence , Hepatitis C/prevention & control , Hepatitis C/transmission , Humans , Interview, Psychological , Male , Middle Aged , Social Stigma , Young Adult
19.
J Adolesc Health ; 65(5): 698-701, 2019 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31540779

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study assessed the immediate availability of naloxone in pharmacies and the knowledge of pharmacy staff regarding naloxone dispensing protocols, especially as it relates to younger adolescents. METHODS: The primary sample included pharmacies in the 10 states with the highest number of opioid-related overdose deaths in 2016; in addition, pharmacies in the 2 states with the highest prevalence of opioid-related overdose deaths in 2016 were also contacted. Researchers simulated a routine conversation between pharmacy staff and a potential customer about the immediate availability of and requirements to purchase naloxone. RESULTS: The primary sample included 120 pharmacies (82.5% chain pharmacies; 50.8% rural). The majority (80.3%) had at least one form of naloxone in stock. Pharmacy staff were knowledgeable about prescription and third-party purchasing requirements. However, almost half incorrectly responded that there was a minimum age requirement to purchase naloxone. CONCLUSION: This study reveals barriers to obtaining naloxone, including a lack of immediate in-store availability and a common misperception that naloxone cannot be dispensed to minors.


Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Naloxone/supply & distribution , Narcotic Antagonists/supply & distribution , Pharmacies/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Health Services Accessibility/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Pharmacies/legislation & jurisprudence , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL