Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 968
Filter
1.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 24(1): 578, 2024 Sep 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39227798

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Risk perception varies greatly among individuals, affecting their behavior and decision-making in risky situations. The COVID-19 pandemic affected worldwide, but the role of risk perception related to COVID-19 in ethnic minorities in Mexico is unclear. This study quantifies the impact of COVID-related risk perception (susceptibility and severity) and perceived fear on the utilization of antenatal care services among indigenous women in San Cristobal de las Casas, Chiapas, Mexico. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective crossover study between June and December 2021, interviewing 98 women from San Cristóbal de las Casas, Chiapas. In a crossover design, each subject acts as their own control, so we required the participants to have a previous pregnancy experience. A logistic model was used to calculate the odds ratio for the outcome of having an adequate number of antenatal care visits. The analysis considered the period (during or before the pandemic) as well as perceived severity and susceptibility levels as independent variables. RESULTS: COVID-19 reduced antenatal care utilization by 50%. During the pandemic, the adjusted odds ratio for attending health antenatal care services was 0.83 (95% CI: 4.8, 14.5) compared to pre pandemics. Adjusted for fear of contagion, the mother's perception of severity was associated with an increased likelihood of an insufficient number of antenatal visits. OR = 0.25 (95% CI: 0.10, 0.65). CONCLUSION: The risk perception for COVID-19 decreased the likelihood of receiving an adequate number of antenatal care visits.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Prenatal Care , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Female , COVID-19/psychology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Prenatal Care/statistics & numerical data , Prenatal Care/psychology , Pregnancy , Adult , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/ethnology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Mexico/ethnology , Retrospective Studies , Indigenous Peoples/psychology , Indigenous Peoples/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Over Studies , Young Adult , Perception , Fear/psychology , Risk Assessment
2.
BMJ Open ; 14(7): e084609, 2024 Jul 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38991685

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to explore the determinants of prenatal breastfeeding knowledge, attitudes and self-efficacy among Burmese migrant pregnant mothers in Samut Sakhon Province, Thailand. DESIGN: The data were collected as part of a baseline survey of a randomised controlled trial. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 198 Burmese migrant mothers between 28th and 34th weeks of gestation were recruited from the antenatal care clinic of Samut Sakhon Hospital. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Breastfeeding knowledge, attitudes and self-efficacy RESULTS: The prevalence of good breastfeeding knowledge was 65.7% (n=130), positive attitudes towards breast feeding were 55.1% (n=109) and high breastfeeding self-efficacy was 70.7% (n=140). Multivariate logistic regression models revealed that mothers aged above 25 years (adjusted OR, AOR 3.1, 95% CI 1.2 to 7.9), being Bamar (AOR 2.3, 95% CI 1.2 to 4.4), having support from husband (AOR 2.3, 95% CI 1.2 to 4.6) and having previous childbirth experience (AOR 2.5, 95% CI 1.3 to 4.8) were the main determinants of good breastfeeding knowledge. Similarly, being Bamar (AOR 2.8, 95% CI 1.5 to 5.3), having high school education (AOR 4.3, 95% CI 1.8 to 10.1) and having access to workplace breastfeeding support (AOR 5.3, 95% CI 1.4 to 20.1) were found to be significant predictors of positive attitudes towards breast feeding. Moreover, mothers aged above 25 years (AOR 2.9, 95% CI 1.1 to 7.8), being Bamar (AOR 2.4, 95% CI 1.2 to 5.1), being unemployed (AOR 7.8, 95% CI 1.9 to 31.9), having support of husband (AOR 3.2, 95% CI 1.5 to 7.0), having previous breastfeeding experience for 6 months or more (AOR 5.0, 95% CI 2.1 to 11.7) and having intention to exclusively breastfeed (AOR 2.7, 95% CI 1.3 to 5.8) had significant associations with high breastfeeding self-efficacy. CONCLUSION: The prenatal breastfeeding knowledge, attitudes and self-efficacy among Burmese migrant mothers were influenced by many factors. A comprehensive understanding of these factors will enable policy-makers and healthcare providers to develop context-specific interventions for the promotion of exclusive breast feeding among Burmese migrant mothers in Thailand. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: TCTR20230310004.


Subject(s)
Breast Feeding , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Self Efficacy , Transients and Migrants , Humans , Female , Breast Feeding/psychology , Breast Feeding/statistics & numerical data , Thailand , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Pregnancy , Transients and Migrants/psychology , Transients and Migrants/statistics & numerical data , Myanmar/ethnology , Young Adult , Mothers/psychology , Prenatal Care/psychology , Logistic Models , Southeast Asian People
3.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 24(1): 470, 2024 Jul 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38987713

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Labor pain is uniquely experienced and described by the woman giving birth, and it is often considered one of the most excruciating experiences for many women. This study aimed to evaluate factors associated with the willingness to receive labor analgesia among women attending the antenatal clinic at Dr. Bogalech Gebre Memorial General Hospital Central Ethiopia in 2022. METHODS: An institution-based, cross-sectional study was conducted from January to March 2022. Data were collected using semi-structured questionnaires by a convenience sampling technique. Data was entered in EpiData 4.2 and exported to SPSS version 20 for analysis. Both Bivariable and multivariable logistic regressions were conducted to determine factors associated with pregnant women's willingness to choose labor analgesia. Crude odds ratio (COR) and adjusted odds ratio (AOR) were computed to assess the association between variables. RESULTS: A total of 398 pregnant women have participated in the study with a response rate of 94%. Nearly 30%, (29.4%) of the pregnant women had a willingness to practice labor pain management. Being a housewife (AOR: 8.35, 95% CI: 2.07, 33.63). Women who live in urban (AOR: 2.60, 95% CI: 1.29, 5.29). Having had awareness about labor analgesia (AOR: 1.70, 95% CI: 1.00, 2.60) and the short duration of labor time (AOR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.15, 2.96) were statistically significant with a willingness to practice labor analgesia. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the willingness of pregnant mothers' toward obstetric analgesia practice was low in the study area. Being a housewife, urban residence, awareness about labor analgesia, and short duration of labor were statistically significant with the willingness of the mothers to practice labor analgesia. To increase willingness to use labor analgesia, authorities should prioritize delivering health education on pain management choices to address concerns and promote effective methods and practices.


Subject(s)
Analgesia, Obstetrical , Labor Pain , Prenatal Care , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Ethiopia , Cross-Sectional Studies , Adult , Analgesia, Obstetrical/psychology , Analgesia, Obstetrical/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult , Prenatal Care/psychology , Labor Pain/psychology , Labor Pain/therapy , Hospitals, General , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Pregnant Women/psychology , Adolescent
4.
Invest Educ Enferm ; 42(2)2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39083837

ABSTRACT

Objective: Understand the motivations and expectations of pregnant women using psychoactive substances during prenatal care. Methods: A qualitative study developed in the light of Alfred Schütz's Theoretical Framework of Phenomenological Sociology, in which 25 pregnant women using psychoactive substances, belonging to a Family Health Strategy, participated. Data production took place between August and November 2022. Results: Two units of meanings emerged: (i) social influences for the performance of prenatal care and (ii) expectation regarding the care to be received by the health professional. Pregnant women do pre-natal due to family influences, for fear of losing their children due to loss of guardianship and concern about the well-being and development of the baby. And, the expectations are that they receive good attention, feel safe when they are attended to by health professionals and also that they are understood and have a relationship of trust. Conclusion: Pregnant women who use psychoactive substances bring motivations for prenatal care linked to the past, such as influences from family members and previous experiences. As for expectations, they are related to the child's health and the care expected by professionals. Finally, strategies to reduce harm during pregnancy of users of psychoactive substances are fundamental for the effectiveness of care.


Subject(s)
Motivation , Prenatal Care , Psychotropic Drugs , Qualitative Research , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Prenatal Care/psychology , Adult , Psychotropic Drugs/administration & dosage , Young Adult , Pregnant Women/psychology , Substance-Related Disorders/psychology , Adolescent
5.
Sex Reprod Healthc ; 41: 100999, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38959679

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The term 'vulnerable' is often used to describe women facing psychosocial adversity during pregnancy, implying a heightened risk of experiencing suboptimal pregnancy outcomes. While this label might facilitate the pathway to appropriate care, it can be perceived as stigmatizing by the women it intends to help, which could deter their interaction with healthcare services. This study explores how women facing psychosocial adversity before, during and after pregnancy perceive the concept of vulnerability and experience being labeled as such. METHODS: We conducted a thematic analysis of semi-structured, in-depth interviews. Through purposive sampling targeting maximum variation, ten women of diverse backgrounds were included. RESULTS: Three central themes emerged: defining vulnerability, embracing vulnerability and the feeling of being stigmatized. Women perceived vulnerability as an inability to adequately care for themselves or their children, necessitating additional support alongside routine antenatal care. Acceptance of the 'vulnerable' label came when it also acknowledged their proactive efforts and strengths to improve their situation. Conversely, if discussions surrounding vulnerability failed to recognize women's agency - specifically, their personal journeys and the courage needed to seek support - the label was perceived as stigmatizing. CONCLUSIONS: Addressing vulnerability effectively in maternity care requires a nuanced, patient-centered approach, acknowledging both the challenges and strengths of women facing psychosocial adversities. Emphasizing personal narratives and their courage in seeking support can mitigate the stigmatizing effects of the 'vulnerable' label. Integrating these narratives into maternal healthcare practices can foster deeper connections with the women involved, enhancing the overall quality of care.


Subject(s)
Prenatal Care , Qualitative Research , Social Stigma , Vulnerable Populations , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Adult , Vulnerable Populations/psychology , Prenatal Care/psychology , Pregnant Women/psychology , Interviews as Topic , Pregnancy Complications/psychology , Stereotyping , Perception , Young Adult
6.
J Hum Lact ; 40(3): 445-453, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38847354

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The benefits of breastfeeding for mothers and infants are well known. However, in Taiwan, the average breastfeeding rate remains below the World Health Organization recommendations. Breastfeeding self-efficacy is a known predictor of breastfeeding. RESEARCH AIMS: To determine: (1) the relationship of sociodemographic factors to prenatal breastfeeding self-efficacy, and (2) the relationship of sociodemographic factors and prenatal breastfeeding self-efficacy to breastfeeding behavior at 8 weeks postpartum among women living in Taiwan. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of 206 pregnant women collected in an outpatient clinic located in Taiwan. The validated Chinese version of the Prenatal Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale (PBSES) was used to measure self-efficacy for breastfeeding during pregnancy. At 8 weeks postpartum, participants were contacted by telephone to obtain information regarding infant feeding method and duration. RESULTS: The mean age of the pregnant women was 32 years, and the mean prenatal breastfeeding self-efficacy score was 78.6 (SD = 10.6). Scores differed across levels of maternal education, previous breastfeeding experience, and support systems. Prenatal breastfeeding self-efficacy scores were highest among participants reporting spouse support versus other types of support. Maternal age and prenatal breastfeeding self-efficacy were predictive of breastfeeding duration. A 1-year increase in maternal age was associated with a 6% lower likelihood of breastfeeding for at least 2 months postpartum, and a 1-point increase in the prenatal breastfeeding self-efficacy score was associated with a 14% increase in the likelihood of breastfeeding for at least 2 months postpartum. CONCLUSIONS: Prenatal breastfeeding self-efficacy may help predict breastfeeding continuation among Taiwanese women in the first 2 months postpartum.


Subject(s)
Breast Feeding , Self Efficacy , Humans , Female , Breast Feeding/psychology , Breast Feeding/statistics & numerical data , Taiwan , Adult , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Young Adult , Social Support , Socioeconomic Factors , Pregnant Women/psychology , Prenatal Care/methods , Prenatal Care/psychology , Prenatal Care/statistics & numerical data
7.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 24(1): 404, 2024 Jun 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38831416

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Occurrences of weight stigma have been documented in prenatal clinical settings from the perspective of pregnant patients, however little is known from the viewpoint of healthcare providers themselves. Reported experiences of weight stigma caused by maternal healthcare providers may be due to negative attitudes towards obesity in pregnancy and a lack of obesity specific education. The objective of this study was to assess weight-related attitudes and assumptions towards obesity in pregnancy among maternal healthcare providers in order to inform future interventions to mitigate weight stigma in prenatal clinical settings. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was administered online for maternal healthcare providers in Canada that assessed weight-related attitudes and assumptions towards lifestyle behaviours in pregnancy for patients who have obesity. Participants indicated their level of agreement on a 5-point likert scale, and mean scores were calculated with higher scores indicating poorer attitudes. Participants reported whether they had observed weight stigma occur in clinical settings. Finally, participants were asked whether or not they had received obesity-specific training, and attitude scores were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Seventy-two maternal healthcare providers (midwives, OBGYNs, residents, perinatal nurses, and family physicians) completed the survey, and 79.2% indicated that they had observed pregnant patients with obesity experience weight stigma in a clinical setting. Those who had obesity training perceived that their peers had poorer attitudes (3.7 ± 0.9) than those without training (3.1 ± 0.7; t(70) = 2.23, p = 0.029, Cohen's d = 0.86). CONCLUSIONS: Weight stigma occurs in prenatal clinical environments, and this was confirmed by maternal healthcare providers themselves. These findings support advocacy efforts to integrate weight stigma related content and mitigation strategies in medical education for health professionals, including maternal healthcare providers. Future work should include prospective examination of weight related attitudes among maternal healthcare providers and implications of obesity specific education, including strategies on mitigating weight stigma in the delivery of prenatal care.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Obesity , Social Stigma , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Cross-Sectional Studies , Adult , Canada , Obesity/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Midwifery , Pregnancy Complications/psychology , Prenatal Care/psychology , Male , Health Personnel/psychology , Maternal Health Services , Middle Aged , Physicians, Family/psychology
8.
Enferm. actual Costa Rica (Online) ; (46): 58441, Jan.-Jun. 2024.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS, BDENF - Nursing, SaludCR | ID: biblio-1550242

ABSTRACT

Resumo Introdução: A gestação configura-se como um acontecimento único e memorável para a vida de uma mulher. A gravidez de alto risco é uma experiência estressante em razão dos riscos a que estão submetidos a mãe e o bebê e devido às mudanças que afetam negativamente o seu equilíbrio emocional. Objetivo: Identificar os sentimentos vivenciados pela gestante frente à gravidez de alto risco. Método: Descritivo e exploratório com abordagem qualitativa, com amostra por conveniência composta por mulheres com gestação de alto risco, selecionadas de acordo com a disponibilidade do serviço de internamento, até a saturação das entrevistas. A coleta dos dados foi realizada em um período de dois meses através de entrevistas guiadas por um roteiro. Os dados foram analisados por meio da técnica de análise de conteúdo segundo Minayo. Resultados: Fizeram parte 37 mulheres. Os resultados foram oeganizados nas categorias: Como se deu o diagnóstico de alto risco; Sentimentos ao descobrir que a gestação é/era de risco; Sentimentos em relação ao apoio familiar acerca da gestação de alto risco. Os sentimentos relatados pelas gestantes e puérperas que conviveram com a gravidez de alto risco, deixam evidentes os impactos que este evento traz não somente na saúde física sobretudo para a emocional, deixando as gestantes fragilizadas. Conclusão: Assim, o estudo nos permitiu perceber que os sentimentos vivenciados nesse processo podem interfir na vida dessas mulheres, e de forma negativa. Mas, que apesar dessa situação, estas expressam sentimentos ambíguos, pois mesmo com o risco gestacional, muitas mostram-se felizes pela dádiva de ser mãe.


Resumen Introducción: El embarazo se considera un evento único y memorable en la vida de una mujer. El embarazo de alto riesgo es una experiencia estresante debido a los riesgos a los que están expuestas tanto la madre como su bebé y a los cambios que afectan negativamente su equilibrio emocional. Objetivo: Identificar los sentimientos experimentados por las mujeres embarazadas frente a un embarazo de alto riesgo. Metodología: Descriptivo y exploratorio con enfoque cualitativo, con una muestra a conveniencia compuesta por mujeres con embarazos de alto riesgo, seleccionadas según la disponibilidad del servicio de hospitalización, hasta la saturación de las entrevistas. La recopilación de datos se llevó a cabo durante un período de dos meses a través de entrevistas guiadas. Los datos fueron analizados utilizando la técnica de análisis de contenido según Minayo. Resultados: Participaron 37 mujeres y los resultados se organizaron en las siguientes categorías: cómo se realizó el diagnóstico de alto riesgo; sentimientos al descubrir que el embarazo era de riesgo; sentimientos con respecto al apoyo familiar en relación con el embarazo de alto riesgo. Los sentimientos relatados por las mujeres embarazadas y posparto que vivieron un embarazo de alto riesgo evidencian los impactos que tiene este evento no solo en la salud física sino, especialmente, en el bienestar emocional, pues deja a las mujeres embarazadas en un estado de vulnerabilidad. Conclusión: El estudio nos permitió darnos cuenta de que los sentimientos experimentados en este proceso pueden interferir en la vida de estas mujeres de manera negativa. Sin embargo, a pesar de esta situación, muchas de ellas expresan sentimientos ambiguos, porque, incluso con el riesgo gestacional, están agradecidas por el regalo de la maternidad.


Abstract Introduction: Pregnancy is considered a unique and memorable event in a woman's life. High-risk pregnancy is a stressful experience due to the risks to which the mother and the baby are exposed, and due to the changes that negatively affect their emotional balance. Objective: To identify the feelings experienced by pregnant women facing high-risk pregnancy. Method: Descriptive and exploratory, employing a qualitative approach, the study featured a convenience sample of women with high-risk pregnancies, selected based on inpatient service availability, until interview saturation was achieved. Data collection was conducted over a two-month period through scripted interviews. Data analysis was performed utilizing Minayo's content analysis technique. Results: Thirty-seven women participated in the study. The results were categorized as follows: How the high-risk diagnosis was determined; Feelings upon discovering the pregnancy was high-risk; Feelings regarding family support regarding the high-risk pregnancy. The feelings reported by pregnant and postpartum women who experienced high-risk pregnancies clearly reveal the impacts this event has, not only on physical health, but especially on emotional well-being, leaving the pregnant women in a vulnerable state. Conclusion: The study allowed us to realize that the feelings experienced in this process can negatively interfere in the lives of these women. However, despite this situation, many of them express mixed feelings, because even with the gestational risk, they are grateful for the gift of motherhood.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Prenatal Care/psychology , Women's Health , Pregnancy, High-Risk/psychology
9.
Matern Child Health J ; 28(9): 1485-1494, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38850378

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: This is a systematic review on patient-provider satisfaction in U.S. prenatal care by addressing the following research question: What factors influence patient-provider satisfaction during prenatal care? METHODS: Thirty six online databases were searched for peer-reviewed research from February to September of 2018 using 10 key terms published in English on U.S. populations between the years 1993-2018 on the topic of provider communication skills and patient satisfaction in the prenatal context. Searches yielded 2563 articles. After duplicates were reviewed and eligibility determined, 32 articles met criteria and were included in the final content analysis. All reported study variables were entered into EXCEL, data reported in each study were analyzed by two people for inter-rater reliability and included in the qualitative content analysis. Two researchers also utilized assessment tools to assess the quality of the articles. RESULTS: Results indicate the importance of good patient-provider communication, that patients have a need for more information on a plethora of topics, and that Hispanic and African American women reported less satisfaction. DISCUSSION: We recommend that future studies measure potentially significant themes not adequately present in the reviewed studies such as practitioner demographics (e.g. gender, years of experience, or race/ethnicity), mothers under 18 years of age, inclusion of religious minorities, patients with differing immigration statuses, and patients with disabilities.


Subject(s)
Communication , Patient Satisfaction , Prenatal Care , Adult , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Physician-Patient Relations , Prenatal Care/methods , Prenatal Care/psychology , United States
10.
BMC Womens Health ; 24(1): 278, 2024 May 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38715013

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Though women in Niger are largely responsible for the familial health and caretaking, prior research shows limited female autonomy in healthcare decisions. This study extends current understanding of women's participation in decision-making and its influence on reproductive health behaviors. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey with married women (15-49 years, N = 2,672) in Maradi and Zinder Niger assessed women's participation in household decision-making in health and non-health issues. Analyses examined [1] if participation in household decision-making was associated with modern contraceptive use, antenatal care (ANC) attendance, and skilled birth attendance at last delivery and [2] what individual, interpersonal, and community-level factors were associated with women's participation in decision-making. RESULTS: Only 16% of the respondents were involved-either autonomously or jointly with their spouse-in all three types of household decisions: (1) large purchase, (2) visiting family/parents, and (3) decisions about own healthcare. Involvement in decision making was significantly associated with increased odds of current modern contraceptive use [aOR:1.36 (95% CI: 1.06-1.75)] and four or more ANC visits during their recent pregnancy [aOR:1.34 (95% CI: 1.00-1.79)], when adjusting for socio-demographic characteristics. There was no significant association between involvement in decision-making and skilled birth attendance at recent delivery. Odds of involvement in decision-making was significantly associated with increasing age and household wealth status, listening to radio, and involvement in decision-making about their own marriage. CONCLUSION: Women's engagement in decision-making positively influences their reproductive health. Social and behavior change strategies to shift social norms and increase opportunities for women's involvement in household decision making are needed. For example, radio programs can be used to inform specific target groups on how women's decision-making can positively influence reproductive health while also providing specific actions to achieve change. Opportunities exist to enhance women's voice either before women enter marital partnerships or after (for instance, using health and social programming).


Subject(s)
Decision Making , Humans , Female , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Adolescent , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Niger , Contraception Behavior/statistics & numerical data , Contraception Behavior/psychology , Reproductive Health/statistics & numerical data , Reproductive Behavior/psychology , Reproductive Behavior/statistics & numerical data , Prenatal Care/statistics & numerical data , Prenatal Care/psychology , Spouses/psychology , Spouses/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy , Health Behavior , Surveys and Questionnaires
11.
J Perinat Med ; 52(5): 467-477, 2024 Jun 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38669584

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Decisional conflict and regret about prenatal genetic screening and diagnostic tests may have important consequences in the current pregnancy and for future reproductive decisions. Identifying mechanisms that reduce conflict associated with the decision to use or decline these options is necessary for optimal patient counseling. METHODS: We conducted a cluster-randomized controlled trial of a shared decision-making tool (NEST) at the beginning of prenatal care. Enrolled patients completed follow-up surveys at the time of testing (QTT) and in the second-third trimester (QFF), including the Decision Conflict Scale (DCS). Total DCS scores were analyzed using a multivariate linear mixed-effect model. RESULTS: Of the total number of participants (n=502) enrolled, 449 completed the QTT and QFF surveys. The mean age of participants was 31.6±3.8, with most parous at the time of study participation (n=321; 71.7 %). Both the NEST (the intervention) and control groups had lower median total DCS scores at QFF (NEST 13.3 [1.7, 25.0] vs. control 16.7 [1.7, 25.0]; p=0.24) compared to QTT (NEST 20.8 [5.0, 25.0] vs. control 18.3 [3.3, 26.7]; p=0.89). Participants exposed to NEST had lower decisional conflict at QFF compared to control (ß -3.889; [CI -7.341, -0.437]; p=0.027). CONCLUSIONS: Using a shared decision-making tool at the start of prenatal care decreased decisional conflict regarding prenatal genetic testing. Such interventions have the potential to provide an important form of decision-making support for patients facing the unique type of complex and preference-based choices about the use of prenatal genetic tests.


Subject(s)
Conflict, Psychological , Genetic Testing , Prenatal Care , Prenatal Diagnosis , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Adult , Prenatal Care/methods , Prenatal Care/psychology , Prenatal Diagnosis/psychology , Prenatal Diagnosis/methods , Decision Making, Shared , Decision Making
12.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth ; 12: e51637, 2024 Apr 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38686560

ABSTRACT

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated telemedicine and mobile app use, potentially changing our historic model of maternity care. MyChart is a widely adopted mobile app used in health care settings specifically for its role in facilitating communication between health care providers and patients with its messaging function in a secure patient portal. However, previous studies analyzing portal use in obstetric populations have demonstrated significant sociodemographic disparities in portal enrollment and messaging, specifically showing that patients who have a low income and are non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, and uninsured are less likely to use patient portals. Objective: The study aimed to estimate changes in patient portal use and intensity in prenatal care before and during the pandemic period and to identify sociodemographic and clinical disparities that continued during the pandemic. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used electronic medical record (EMR) and administrative data from our health system's Enterprise Data Warehouse. Records were obtained for the first pregnancy episode of all patients who received antenatal care at 8 academically affiliated practices and delivered at a large urban academic medical center from January 1, 2018, to July 22, 2021, in Chicago, Illinois. All patients were aged 18 years or older and attended ≥3 clinical encounters during pregnancy at the practices that used the EMR portal. Patients were categorized by the number of secure messages sent during pregnancy as nonusers or as infrequent (≤5 messages), moderate (6-14 messages), or frequent (≥15 messages) users. Monthly portal use and intensity rates were computed over 43 months from 2018 to 2021 before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic shutdown. A logistic regression model was estimated to identify patient sociodemographic and clinical subgroups with the highest portal nonuse. Results: Among 12,380 patients, 2681 (21.7%) never used the portal, and 2680 (21.6%), 3754 (30.3%), and 3265 (26.4%) were infrequent, moderate, and frequent users, respectively. Portal use and intensity increased significantly over the study period, particularly after the pandemic. The number of nonusing patients decreased between 2018 and 2021, from 996 of 3522 (28.3%) in 2018 to only 227 of 1743 (13%) in the first 7 months of 2021. Conversely, the number of patients with 15 or more messages doubled, from 642 of 3522 (18.2%) in 2018 to 654 of 1743 (37.5%) in 2021. The youngest patients, non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic patients, and, particularly, non-English-speaking patients had significantly higher odds of continued nonuse. Patients with preexisting comorbidities, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, diabetes, and a history of mental health conditions were all significantly associated with higher portal use and intensity. Conclusions: Reducing disparities in messaging use will require outreach and assistance to low-use patient groups, including education addressing health literacy and encouraging appropriate and effective use of messaging.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Patient Portals , Prenatal Care , Humans , Female , Retrospective Studies , Pregnancy , Adult , Prenatal Care/statistics & numerical data , Prenatal Care/psychology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Patient Portals/statistics & numerical data , Chicago , Academic Medical Centers/organization & administration , Academic Medical Centers/statistics & numerical data , Telemedicine/statistics & numerical data , Telemedicine/methods , Electronic Health Records/statistics & numerical data , Pregnant Women/psychology , Pregnant Women/ethnology , Pandemics
13.
BMC Womens Health ; 24(1): 195, 2024 Mar 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38528557

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to investigate the prevalence, severity, and factors associated with antenatal depression among women receiving antenatal care at Mubende Regional Referral Hospital (MRRH) in Uganda. Antenatal depression is a critical concern for maternal and child well-being, as it is associated with adverse outcomes such as preterm birth, abortion, low birth weight, and impaired maternal-infant bonding. Despite several international guidelines recommending routine screening for antenatal depression, local Ugandan guidelines often overlook this essential aspect of maternal care. METHODS: A cross-sectional study involving 353 pregnant women utilized the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) to assess antenatal depression. Participants were categorized as having antenatal depression if their total PHQ-9 score was ≥ 5 and met the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria for either major or minor depression. Psychosocial demographic and obstetric characteristics were recorded. Logistic regression analysis identified factors linked to antenatal depression. RESULTS: The burden of antenatal depression was notably high, affecting 37.68% of the participants. Among those with antenatal depression, the majority exhibited mild symptoms 94 (70.68%). The significant factors associated with antenatal depression, revealed by multivariate analysis, included younger age (≤ 20 years), older age (≥ 35 years), history of domestic violence, alcohol use, gestational age, history of abortion, history of preeclampsia, and unplanned pregnancies. CONCLUSION: This study revealed a significantly high prevalence of antenatal depression, emphasizing its public health importance. Most cases were classified as mild, emphasizing the importance of timely interventions to prevent escalation. The identified risk factors included age, history of domestic violence, alcohol use, first-trimester pregnancy, abortion history, previous preeclampsia, and unplanned pregnancy.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Spontaneous , Pre-Eclampsia , Pregnancy Complications , Premature Birth , Adult , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Young Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/complications , Hospitals , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications/psychology , Pregnancy, Unplanned , Prenatal Care/psychology , Prevalence , Risk Factors
14.
Sex Reprod Healthc ; 39: 100949, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38281399

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The Covid-19 pandemic led to a reorganization of antenatal care including the cancellation or shift into telemedicine of consultations and restrictions to the presence of an accompanying person. The aim was to explore healthcare professionals' and women's lived experience of such reorganisation consequences on the quality of care and specific challenges they faced, with a particular emphasis on telemedicine and equity. METHODS: Exploratory qualitative study using semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions of women and healthcare providers in New Aquitaine (France) and in the Basque Country (Spain). We collected data from a purposive sampling of women (n = 33) and professionals (n = 19) who had received or provided antenatal care in hospitals and ambulatory facilities between March 2020 and December 2021. Participants' narratives were thematically analysed to identify themes that were subsequently contextualised to the two territories. RESULTS: Antenatal care professionals and pregnant women experienced strong emotions and suffered from organizational changes that compromised the quality and equity of care. The pandemic and associated restrictions were sources of emotional distress, fear and loneliness, especially among more disadvantaged and isolated women. Among professionals, the lack of adequate means of protection and the multiple changes in caring protocols generated burnout, feeling of abandonment and emotional distress. CONCLUSIONS: The Covid-19 experience should serve to critically consider the unexpected consequences of reorganising healthcare services and the need to meet patients' needs, with a particular consideration for disadvantaged groups. Future scenarios of telemedicine generalisation should consider a combination of in presence and remote consultations ensuring antenatal care quality and equity.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Prenatal Care , Female , Pregnancy , Humans , Prenatal Care/psychology , Pandemics , Pregnant Women/psychology , Qualitative Research , Europe
15.
Birth ; 51(1): 81-88, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37635414

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In the United States, the incidence of substance misuse among pregnant women has been steadily increasing. While pregnant women with substance use disorder (SUD) are in critical need of support during the prenatal period, they enter prenatal care stigmatized and facing the possibility of punitive responses. Little research has been done about how women with SUDs themselves experience pregnancy and the transition to motherhood. The aim of this study was to examine women's internal experiences of pregnancy in the context of SUD. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with n = 19 postpartum women with SUD. Data were analyzed using a semantic, thematic approach. RESULTS: Participants expressed their thoughts and experiences about their pregnancies in four main themes: (1) fear of harming the baby; (2) fear about child welfare involvement; (3) guilt informed by recovery stage; and (4) mixed feelings about pregnancy amidst complicated circumstances. The women expressed fear about their children's well-being, coupled with motivation to protect their child and the need for clear medical information. Their expressions of guilt depended on the severity of their SUD and their stage in recovery during their pregnancy. Women entered prenatal care with mixed emotions about their pregnancy, such as guilt and excitement, in the midst of complicated life circumstances. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest a complexity of internal experiences for pregnant women with SUDs. Participants' feelings and experiences during pregnancy can inform practitioners' approaches to prenatal care in the context of SUDs.


Subject(s)
Pregnant Women , Substance-Related Disorders , Male , Child , Female , Pregnancy , Humans , Qualitative Research , Pregnant Women/psychology , Postpartum Period/psychology , Prenatal Care/psychology
16.
Sex Reprod Healthc ; 39: 100931, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38039661

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Male engagement in antenatal care (ANC) has been recommended by the World Health Organization to improve maternal and newborn health outcomes, but implementation challenges remain. This study explored barriers, facilitators, and opportunities to improve male attendance and engagement in ANC. METHODS: In-depth interviews were conducted individually with pregnant women and male partners attending a first ANC visit at two public health facilities in Moshi, Tanzania. Interviews examined factors influencing male ANC attendance and male experiences during the clinic visit. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and translated from Swahili into English. Transcripts were coded thematically in NVivo. MAIN FINDINGS: Constructions of masculinity both positively and negatively influenced male involvement in ANC. Individual-level barriers included a fear of HIV testing, perceptions of pregnancy as the woman's responsibility, and discomfort with ANC as a predominantly female space. Structural barriers included inability to take time off from work and long clinic wait times. The primary facilitator to male involvement was the preferential care given in the ANC clinic to women who present with a male partner. Additionally, some men desired to learn about their family's health status and felt that attending ANC was a sign of respect and love for their partner. CONCLUSIONS: Opportunities exist to improve male involvement in ANC, namely training providers to engage men beyond HIV testing and counseling. Peer programs that promote men's engagement in pregnancy could prove useful to reduce apprehension around HIV testing and dispel conceptions of ANC as only a women's healthcare space.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Prenatal Care , Infant, Newborn , Female , Humans , Male , Pregnancy , Prenatal Care/psychology , Tanzania , Men/psychology , Pregnant Women/psychology , Masculinity , HIV Infections/diagnosis , HIV Infections/prevention & control
17.
Arch Sex Behav ; 53(2): 745-756, 2024 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37943471

ABSTRACT

We implemented and assessed a comprehensive, antenatal care (ANC)-embedded strategy to prevent HIV seroconversions during pregnancy in Uganda. HIV-negative first-time ANC clients were administered an HIV risk assessment tool and received individual risk counseling. Those attending ANC without partners obtained formal partner invitation letters. After three months, repeat HIV testing was carried out; non-attending women were reminded via phone. We analyzed uptake and acceptance, HIV incidence rate, and risk behavior engagement. Among 1081 participants, 116 (10.7%) reported risk behavior engagement at first visit; 148 (13.7%) were accompanied by partners. At the repeat visit (n = 848), 42 (5%, p < 0.001) reported risk behavior engagement; 248 (29.4%, p < 0.001) women came with partners. Seroconversion occurred in two women. Increased odds for risk behavior engagement were found in rural clients (aOR 3.96; 95% CI 1.53-10.26), women with positive or unknown partner HIV-status (2.86; 1.18-6.91), and women whose partners abused alcohol (2.68; 1.15-6.26). Overall, the assessed HIV prevention strategy for pregnant women seemed highly feasible and effective. Risk behavior during pregnancy was reduced by half and partner participation rates in ANC doubled. The observed HIV incidence rate was almost four times lower compared to a pre-intervention cohort in the same study setting.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Female , Pregnancy , Humans , Prenatal Care/psychology , Pregnant Women , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Uganda/epidemiology , Counseling , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control
18.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 14443, 2023 09 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37660079

ABSTRACT

Maternal morbidity and mortality remain high among women who did not attend antenatal care (ANC). Antenatal care is one of the interventions given to pregnant women to detect existed problems or problems that can develop during pregnancy, which harm the health of pregnant women and fetuses. In Ethiopia, however, there is limited evidence that revealed the effect of antenatal depression on ANC service utilization. Hence, this study aimed to see the effect of antenatal depression on ANC visits among women in urban northwest Ethiopia. A population-based, prospective cohort study was done from June 2019 to March 2020. The Edinburgh postnatal depression scale was administered to 970 women in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy to screen for antenatal depression. Additional data were collected on ANC visits, the mother's socio-demographic, obstetric, clinical, psychosocial, and behavioral factors. A logistic regression model was used to adjust confounders and determine associations between antenatal depression and inadequate ANC visits. The cumulative incidence of inadequate ANC visits was 62.58% (95% CI: 59.43, 65.63). The cumulative incidence of inadequate ANC visits among depressed pregnant women was 75% as compared to 56% in non-depressed. The incidence of inadequate ANC visits in the exposed group due to antenatal depression was 25.33%. After multivariable analysis, antenatal depression at the second and third trimesters of pregnancy remained a potential predictor of inadequate ANC visits (AOR = 1.96: (95% CI 1.22, 3.16)). In addition, antenatal depression, long travel time for ANC visits (AOR = 1.83 (95% CI 1.166, 2.870)), and late initiation of ANC visits (AOR = 2.20 (95% CI 1.393, 3.471)) were the predictors of inadequate ANC visits as compared to their counterpart. This study suggested that antenatal depression affects ANC visits in Ethiopian urban settings. Therefore, early detecting and treating depression symptoms during the antenatal period reduced significantly the impacts of depression on the health of the mother and fetus.


Subject(s)
Depression , Pregnancy Complications , Prenatal Care , Ethiopia/epidemiology , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/psychology , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Prenatal Care/psychology , Prenatal Care/statistics & numerical data , Cohort Studies , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications/psychology , Adult
19.
JAAPA ; 36(10): 29-32, 2023 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37751254

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: This article explores the effect of psychosocial stress on Hispanic immigrant women, including access to and use of prenatal care and birth outcomes. In addition to highlighting the health effects for this growing population, the article outlines strategies for clinicians to improve access to adequate prenatal care and to cultivate a supportive environment to promote use of prenatal services.


Subject(s)
Emigrants and Immigrants , Health Services Accessibility , Hispanic or Latino , Prenatal Care , Stress, Psychological , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Emigrants and Immigrants/psychology , Emigrants and Immigrants/statistics & numerical data , Hispanic or Latino/psychology , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Prenatal Care/psychology , Prenatal Care/statistics & numerical data , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Stress, Psychological/ethnology , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Pregnancy Outcome/ethnology , Pregnancy Outcome/psychology , United States/epidemiology
20.
Reprod Health ; 20(1): 124, 2023 Aug 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37626357

ABSTRACT

The emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic significantly changed the prenatal care experience, specifically regarding medical appointments and social opportunities. It is critical to capture this change through the narratives of pregnant people, particularly those of marginalized populations, whose voices may often be underrepresented in the literature. This mixed-methods paper summarizes the experiences of 40 pregnant Black/African American (AA) women during the COVID-19 pandemic. A cross-sectional, online survey was administered between 2020 and 2021 to assess prenatal health and the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients' pregnancy experience. Coping behaviors during the pandemic were self-reported using the COPE-IS. Univariate analyses were conducted. An additional analysis of participants (n = 4) was explored through a week-long qualitative exercise using a photo documentation procedure. Photo-Elicitation Interviews (PEI) were conducted to capture and center their pandemic pregnancy experiences. Sources of stress during the pandemic varied, with the most common being financial concerns (n = 19, 47.5%). Over half of the sample (n = 18, 54.5%) self-reported increases in their positive coping behaviors during the pandemic, such as communicating with friends and family, talking to healthcare providers, listening to music, and engaging in spiritual practices-such as prayer. The four PEI study participants reflected on the impacts of social distancing on their prenatal experience and mentioned hospital and provider-related weariness due to their race. The findings of this study suggest that during the COVID-19 pandemic, Black/AA pregnant women in Charlotte, NC used social support, mindfulness practices, self-advocacy, and health literacy to navigate challenges present during their prenatal health experience. This paper highlights the personal, social, and structural experiences of pregnant women during a public health crisis so that responsive and effective programs or policies can be planned in the future.


Subject(s)
Black People , COVID-19 , Pregnant Women , Prenatal Care , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Black People/psychology , COVID-19/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Pandemics , Pregnant Women/ethnology , Pregnant Women/psychology , Prenatal Care/psychology , Loneliness , Self Concept , Social Support , Mindfulness , Communication
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL