Effect of dose to parotid ducts on Sticky Saliva and Xerostomia in radiotherapy of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy (RT) in head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) often leads to sticky saliva and xerostomia (SSX). Dose sparing of salivary glands (SG) reduces occurrence of SSX but few studies investigated the relationship between RT dose to SG substructures and SSX. We therefore investigated this hypothesis, focusing on the parotid duct (PD). METHODS: Retrospective data was collected from 99 HNSCC patients treated at our center with (chemo-)radiotherapy (CRT). PD and other organs-at-risk (OAR) were (re-)contoured and DVHs were generated without re-planning. SSX was graded according to CTCAE v.4.03 and evaluated at acute, subacute, and two late timepoints. RESULTS: Most patients presented with loco-regionally advanced disease. In 47% of patients, up-front neck dissection preceded CRT. Weighted mean dose was 28.6 Gy for bilateral parotid glands (PG), and 32.0 Gy for PD. Acute SSX presented as grades 0 (35.3%), I (41.4%), II (21.2%) and III (2.0%). There was no association of OARs and SSX ≥ grade 2 in univariable logistic regression (LR). Multivariable LR showed statistically significant relationship of acute SSX with: PG weighted mean dose (OR 0.84, p = 0.004), contralateral PG mean dose (OR 1.14, p = 0.02) and contralateral PD planning OAR (PD PRV) mean dose (OR 1.84, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: There was an association of acute SSX with dose exposure of PD PRV in multivariable regression, only. Due to statistical uncertainties and the retrospective nature of this analysis, further studies are required to confirm or reject the hypothesis.

Prostate radiotherapy may cause fertility issues: a retrospective analysis of testicular dose following modern radiotherapy techniques.

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer in younger men is rare but not exceptional. Radiotherapy is a cornerstone of prostate cancer treatment and yet, its impact on fertility is scarcely reported in literature. Given the radiosensitivity of testicular tissue, this study aimed to determine the testicular dose using modern radiotherapy techniques for definitive prostate irradiation. METHODS: One hundred radiotherapy plans were reviewed. Testicles were contoured retrospectively without dosimetric optimization on testicles. RESULTS: The median testicular dose was 0.58 Gy: 0.18 Gy in stereotactic plans, 0.62 Gy in Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy plans and 1.50 Gy in Tomotherapy plans (p < 0.001). Pelvic nodal irradiation increased the median testicular dose to 1.18 Gy versus 0.26 Gy without nodal irradiation (p < 0.001). Weight and BMI were inversely associated with testicular dose (p < 0.005). 65% of patients reached the theoretical dose threshold for transient azoospermia, and 10% received more than 2 Gy, likely causing definitive azoospermia. CONCLUSION: Despite being probably lower than doses from older techniques, the testicular dose delivered with modern prostate radiotherapy is not negligible and is often underestimated because the contribution of daily repositioning imaging is not taken into account and most Treatment Planning Systems underestimate the out of field dose. Radiation oncologists should consider the impact on fertility and gonadal endocrine function, counseling men on sperm preservation if they wish to maintain fertility. TRIAL REGISTRATION: retrospectively registered.

Dosimetric comparison of ZAP-X, Gamma Knife, and CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery for single brain metastasis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the dosimetric characteristics of ZAP-X stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for single brain metastasis by comparing with two mature SRS platforms. METHODS: Thirteen patients with single brain metastasis treated with CyberKnife (CK) G4 were selected retrospectively. The prescription dose for the planning target volume (PTV) was 18-24 Gy for 1-3 fractions. The PTV volume ranged from 0.44 to 11.52 cc.Treatment plans of thirteen patients were replanned using the ZAP-X plan system and the Gamma Knife (GK) ICON plan system with the same prescription dose and organs at risk (OARs) constraints. The prescription dose of PTV was normalized to 70% for both ZAP-X and CK, while it was 50% for GK. The dosimetric parameters of three groups included the plan characteristics (CI, GI, GSI, beams, MUs, treatment time), PTV (D2, D95, D98, Dmin, Dmean, Coverage), brain tissue (volume of 100%-10% prescription dose irradiation V100%-V10%, Dmean) and other OARs (Dmax, Dmean),all of these were compared and evaluated. All data were read and analyzed with MIM Maestro. One-way ANOVA or a multisample Friedman rank sum test was performed, where p < 0.05 indicated significant differences. RESULTS: The CI of GK was significantly lower than that of ZAP-X and CK. Regarding the mean value, ZAP-X had a lower GI and higher GSI, but there was no significant difference among the three groups. The MUs of ZAP-X were significantly lower than those of CK, and the mean value of the treatment time of ZAP-X was significantly shorter than that of CK. For PTV, the D95, D98, and target coverage of CK were higher, while the mean of Dmin of GK was significantly lower than that of CK and ZAP-X. For brain tissue, ZAP-X showed a smaller volume from V100% to V20%; the statistical results of V60% and V50% showed a difference between ZAP-X and GK, while the V40% and V30% showed a significant difference between ZAP-X and the other two groups; V10% and Dmean indicated that GK was better. Excluding the Dmax of the brainstem, right optic nerve and optic chiasm, the mean value of all other OARs was less than 1 Gy. For the brainstem, GK and ZAP-X had better protection, especially at the maximum dose. CONCLUSION: For the SRS treating single brain metastasis, all three treatment devices, ZAP-X system, CyberKnife G4 system, and GammaKnife system, could meet clinical treatment requirements. The newly platform ZAP-X could provide a high-quality plan equivalent to or even better than CyberKnife and Gamma Knife, with ZAP-X presenting a certain dose advantage, especially with a more conformal dose distribution and better protection for brain tissue. As the ZAP-X systems get continuous improvements and upgrades, they may become a new SRS platform for the treatment of brain metastasis.

Long-term evaluation of the safety of a rectal-prostate spacer, the ProSpace® balloon, in patients treated with radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Due to the close proximity of the prostate and rectum, rectal toxicity remains a major problem in patient treated by radiotherapy for prostate adenocarcinoma. One method of increasing the distance between the prostate and the rectum is to use a spacer implanted into the rectoprostatic space. This report describes the long-term outcomes obtained with a new ballon spacer. METHODS: Patients treated with curative radiotherapy for low- or intermediate-risk prostate adenocarcinoma, who underwent insertion of the ProSpace® (BioProtect Ltd, Tzur Yigal, Israel) rectal-prostate balloon spacer, were included. The main objective was to evaluate the dosimetric benefit of the spacer for OARs. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the feasibility and tolerability of ProSpace® balloon placement and to evaluate its long-term therapeutic efficacy and tolerance. RESULTS: Between October 2013 and March 2015, 16 patients were enrolled in the Pasteur Clinic, Toulouse, France. The median follow-up was 85.5 months. From top to bottom, the space created was a mean of 16.3 mm (range: 11-20.5 mm) at the base of the prostate, 12.1 mm (range: 4-16 mm) at the middle and 8.9 mm at the apex (range: 5-15 mm). On average, rectal volumes receiving a dose of 70 Gy, 60 Gy and 50 Gy were significantly lower after balloon implantation: -4.81 cc (1.5 vs. 6.3; p < 0.0005), -8.08 cc (6.4 vs. 14.5; p = 0.002) and -9.06 cc (16.7 vs. 25.7; p = 0.003), respectively. There were significant differences in coverage after balloon implantation: Median V95% (p < 0.0005), median Dmin (p = 0.01) and median V98% (p < 0.001) were higher after balloon implantation. At 5 years, cumulative gastrointestinal toxicity was grade 1 in 6% (1/16 patients). No toxicity of grade 2 or higher was found. At 5 years, no urinary toxicity grade 3 or 4 toxicity was found. The QoL was not deteriorated. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the ProSpace® balloon seems to be well accepted by patients, allowing a double dosimetric gain: a decrease in doses received by the rectum and an improvement in the coverage of the high-risk PTV. The long-term gastrointestinal toxicity remains low and QoL is preserved in all treated patients.

Treatment outcome of localized prostate cancer using transperineal ultrasound image-guided radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: We report the results of a retrospective analysis of localized prostate cancer (LPCa) treated with transperineal ultrasound image-guided radiotherapy (TPUS-IGRT). METHODS: A total of 124 patients (median age: 74 y, 46-84 y) with LPCa who underwent TPUS-IGRT (Clarity Autoscan system; CAS, Elekta; Stockholm, Sweden) between April 2016 and October 2021 for curative/after hormone induction were enrolled. The number of patients by risk (National Comprehensive Cancer Network 2019) was 7, 25, 42, and 50 for low (LR), good intermediate (good IR), poor intermediate (poor IR), and high (HR)/very high (VHR), respectively. Ninety-five patients were given neoadjuvant hormonal therapy. The planning target volume margin setting was 3 mm for rectal in most cases, 5-7 mm for superior/inferior, and 5 mm for anterior/right/left. The principle prescribed dose is 74 Gy (LR), 76 Gy (good IR), and 76-78 Gy (poor IR or above). CAS was equipped with a real-time prostate intrafraction monitoring (RTPIFM) system. When a displacement of 2-3 mm or more was detected, irradiation was paused, and the patients were placed on standby for prostate reinstatement/recorrection. Of the 3135 fractions in 85 patients for whom RTPIFM was performed, 1008 fractions (32.1%) were recorrected at least once after starting irradiation. RESULTS: A total of 123 patients completed the radiotherapy course. The 5-year overall survival rate was 95.9%. The 5-year biological prostate-specific antigen relapse-free survival rate (bPFS) was 100% for LR, 92.9% for intermediate IR, and 93.2% for HR/VHR (Phoenix method). The 5-year late toxicity rate of Grade 2+ was 7.4% for genitourinary (GU) and 6.5% for gastrointestinal (GI) organs. Comparing the ≤ 76 Gy group to the 78 Gy group for both GU and GI organs, the incidence was higher in the 78 Gy group for both groups. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that TPUS-IGRT is well tolerated, as the bPFS and incidence of late toxicity are almost comparable to those reported by other sources of image-guided radiotherapy.

Proton Beam Range and Charge Verification Using Multilayer Faraday Collector.

PURPOSE: A daily quality assurance (QA) check in proton therapy is ensuring that the range of each proton beam energy in water is accurate to 1 mm. This is important for ensuring that the tumor is adequately irradiated while minimizing damage to surrounding healthy tissue. It is also important to verify the total charge collected against the beam model. This work proposes a time-efficient method for verifying the range and total charge of proton beams at different energies using a multilayer Faraday collector (MLFC). METHODS: We used an MLFC-128-250 MeV comprising 128 layers of thin copper foils separated by thin insulating KaptonTM layers. Protons passing through the collector induce a charge on the metallic foils, which is integrated and measured by a multichannel electrometer. The charge deposition on the foils provides information about the beam range. RESULTS: Our results show that the proton beam range obtained using MLFC correlates closely with the range obtained from commissioning water tank measurements for all proton energies. Upon applying a range calibration factor, the maximum deviation is 0.4 g/cm2. The MLFC range showed no dependence on the number of monitor units and the source-to-surface distance. Range measurements collected over multiple weeks exhibited stability. The total charge collected agrees closely with the theoretical charge from the treatment planning system beam model for low- and mid-range energies. CONCLUSIONS: We have calibrated and commissioned the use of the MLFC to easily verify range and total charge of proton beams. This tool will improve the workflow efficiency of the proton QA.

Feasibility of dose calculation for treatment plans using electron density maps from a novel dual-layer detector spectral CT simulator.

BACKGROUND: Conventional single-energy CT can only provide a raw estimation of electron density (ED) for dose calculation by developing a calibration curve that simply maps the HU values to ED values through their correlations. Spectral CT, also known as dual-energy CT (DECT) or multi-energy CT, can generate a series of quantitative maps, such as ED maps. Using spectral CT for radiotherapy simulations can directly acquire ED information without developing specific calibration curves. The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of utilizing electron density (ED) maps generated by a novel dual-layer detector spectral CT simulator for dose calculation in radiotherapy treatment plans. METHODS: 30 patients from head&neck, chest, and pelvic treatment sites were selected retrospectively, and all of them underwent spectral CT simulation. Treatment plans based on conventional CT images were transplanted to ED maps with the same structure set, including planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs), and the dose distributions were then recalculated. The differences in dose and volume histogram (DVH) parameters of the PTV and OARs between the two types of plans were analyzed and compared. Besides, gamma analysis between these plans was performed by using MEPHYSTO Navigator software. RESULTS: In terms of PTV, the homogeneity index (HI), gradient index (GI), D2%, D98%, and Dmean showed no significant difference between conventional plans and ED plans. For OARs, statistically significant differences were observed in parotids D50%, brainstem in head&neck plans, spinal cord in chest plans and rectum D50% in pelvic plans, whereas the variance remained minor. For the rest, the DVH parameters exhibited no significant difference between conventional plans and ED plans. All of the mean gamma passing rates (GPRs) of gamma analysis were higher than 90%. CONCLUSION: Compared to conventional treatment plans relying on CT images, plans utilizing ED maps demonstrated similar dosimetric quality. However, the latter approach enables direct utilization in dose calculation without the requirements of establishing and selecting a specific Hounsfield unit (HU) to ED calibration curve, providing an advantage in clinical applications.

Quantifying the Dosimetric Impact of Proton Range Uncertainties on RBE-Weighted Dose Distributions in Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy for Bilateral Head and Neck Cancer.

BACKGROUND: In current clinical practice, intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) head and neck cancer (HNC) plans are generated using a constant relative biological effectiveness (cRBE) of 1.1. The primary goal of this study was to explore the dosimetric impact of proton range uncertainties on RBE-weighted dose (RWD) distributions using a variable RBE (vRBE) model in the context of bilateral HNC IMPT plans. METHODS: The current study included the computed tomography (CT) datasets of ten bilateral HNC patients who had undergone photon therapy. Each patient's plan was generated using three IMPT beams to deliver doses to the CTV_High and CTV_Low for doses of 70 Gy(RBE) and 54 Gy(RBE), respectively, in 35 fractions through a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique. Each nominal plan calculated with a cRBE of 1.1 was subjected to the range uncertainties of ±3%. The McNamara vRBE model was used for RWD calculations. For each patient, the differences in dosimetric metrices between the RWD and nominal dose distributions were compared. RESULTS: The constrictor muscles, oral cavity, parotids, larynx, thyroid, and esophagus showed average differences in mean dose (Dmean) values up to 6.91 Gy(RBE), indicating the impact of proton range uncertainties on RWD distributions. Similarly, the brachial plexus, brain, brainstem, spinal cord, and mandible showed varying degrees of the average differences in maximum dose (Dmax) values (2.78-10.75 Gy(RBE)). The Dmean and Dmax to the CTV from RWD distributions were within ±2% of the dosimetric results in nominal plans. CONCLUSION: The consistent trend of higher mean and maximum doses to the OARs with the McNamara vRBE model compared to cRBE model highlighted the need for consideration of proton range uncertainties while evaluating OAR doses in bilateral HNC IMPT plans.

Long-term Outcome After Helical Tomotherapy Following Breast Conserving Surgery for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Background: This retrospective study aimed to investigate the outcomes and adverse events (AEs) associated with adjuvant radiotherapy with helical tomotherapy (hT) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Methods: Twenty-eight patients with DCIS underwent postoperative hT between 2011 and 2020. hT was chosen since it provided optimal target coverage and tolerable organ-at-risk doses to the lungs and heart when tangential 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) was presumed to provide unfavorable dosimetry. The median total (single) dose was 50.4 Gy (1.8 Gy). The median time between BCS and the start of hT was 5 weeks (range, 4-38 weeks). Statistical analysis included local recurrence-free survival, overall survival (OS), and secondary cancer-free survival. AEs were classified according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5. Results: The patients' median age was 58 years. The median follow-up period was 61 months (range, 3-123 months). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 100% each. None of the patients developed secondary cancer, local recurrence, or invasive breast cancer during follow-up. The most common acute AEs were dermatitis (n = 27), fatigue (n = 4), hyperpigmentation (n = 3), and thrombocytopenia (n = 4). The late AE primarily included surgical scars (n = 7) and hyperpigmentation (n = 5). None of the patients experienced acute or late AEs > grade 3. The mean conformity and homogeneity indices were 0.9 (range, 0.86-0.96) and 0.056 (range, 0.05-0.06), respectively. Conclusion: hT after BCS for DCIS is a feasible and safe form of adjuvant radiotherapy for patients in whom 3D-CRT is contraindicated due to unfavorable dosimetry. During follow-up, there were no recurrences, invasive breast cancer diagnoses, or secondary cancers, while the adverse effects were mild.

Implementation of 3D Printing and Modeling Technologies for the Fabrication of Dose Boluses for External Radiotherapy at the CLCC of Sétif, Algeria.

Objective: In external radiotherapy, dose boluses and compensators are used for treatment of irregular facial topography surfaces. In such cases, skewed isodose curves need to be addressed using a bolus that gives the deep dose distribution a shape adapted to the anatomical structures to be protected or irradiated. The combination of 3D modeling and printing technologies is a promising alternative to the conventional inaccurate and uncomfortable bolus fabrication technique. In this work, the proposed technologies will be used in the design and fabrication of high-performance and high-accuracy boluses that respond to the main constraints on metrology, adhesion to the patient's surface, comfort, and dose delivery. Methods: As a first phase in the implementation of the proposed solution, 3D printing materials, to be used in the fabrication of radiotherapy boluses, were selected and characterized to check how they respond to the required criteria on functionality, safety, and quality. Results: The obtained results show that among the studied materials, thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) was found to be slightly more suitable than polylactic acid (PLA) for the fabrication of 3D printing boluses but for some kinds of treatments, PLA may be preferred despite its relative rigidity. Conclusion: In this work, procedures for dose bolus fabrication were proposed, and necessary data were obtained for some available 3D printing materials (TPU and PLA) that can be used for targeted applications. This achievement is a major step toward the final implementation of 3D modeling and printing technologies for the efficient fabrication of radiotherapy dose boluses.

A comparison of target volumes drawn on arterial and venous phase scans during radiation therapy planning for patients with pancreatic cancer: the PANCRINJ study.

BACKGROUND: The planification of radiation therapy (RT) for pancreatic cancer (PC) requires a dosimetric computed tomography (CT) scan to define the gross tumor volume (GTV). The main objective of this study was to compare the inter-observer variability in RT planning between the arterial and the venous phases following intravenous contrast. METHODS: PANCRINJ was a prospective monocentric study that included twenty patients with non-metastatic PC. Patients underwent a pre-therapeutic CT scan at the arterial and venous phases. The delineation of the GTV was performed by one radiologist (gold standard) and two senior radiation oncologists (operators). The primary objective was to compare the Jaccard conformity index (JCI) for the GTVs computed between the GS (gold standard) and the operators between the arterial and the venous phases with a Wilcoxon signed rank test for paired samples. The secondary endpoints were the geographical miss index (GMI), the kappa index, the intra-operator variability, and the dose-volume histograms between the arterial and venous phases. RESULTS: The median JCI for the arterial and venous phases were 0.50 (range, 0.17-0.64) and 0.41 (range, 0.23-0.61) (p = 0.10) respectively. The median GS-GTV was statistically significantly smaller compared to the operators at the arterial (p < 0.0001) and venous phases (p < 0.001), respectively. The GMI were low with few tumors missed for all patients with a median GMI of 0.07 (range, 0-0.79) and 0.05 (range, 0-0.39) at the arterial and venous phases, respectively (p = 0.15). There was a moderate agreement between the radiation oncologists with a median kappa index of 0.52 (range 0.38-0.57) on the arterial phase, and 0.52 (range 0.36-0.57) on the venous phase (p = 0.08). The intra-observer variability for GTV delineation was lower at the venous phase than at the arterial phase for the two operators. There was no significant difference between the arterial and the venous phases regarding the dose-volume histogram for the operators. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed inter- and intra-observer variability in delineating GTV for PC without significant differences between the arterial and the venous phases. The use of both phases should be encouraged. Our findings suggest the need to provide training for radiation oncologists in pancreatic imaging and to collaborate within a multidisciplinary team.

Split X-Jaw techniques of volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal cancer: A dosimetric comparison.

PURPOSE: The current study aims to compare the split x-jaw planning technique of volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) with the traditional open and limited jaw techniques of VAMT in nasopharyngeal carcinoma treatment. The multi-leaf collimators on the varian linear accelerator move on a carriage with a maximum leaf span of 15 cm. Therefore, treatment of larger planning target volumes, such as in nasopharyngeal cancer with traditional open and limited jaw technique, yields compromised dose distribution. METHOD: Computed tomography data sets of 10 nasopharynx cancer patients were enrolled for the study. For each case, three separate treatment plans were generated viz. open, limited, and split x-jaw planning techniques with similar planning objectives. Only PTVs requiring a field size larger than 18 cm in the x-jaw position were considered. RESULTS: Comparable results were obtained regarding organs at risk (OAR) sparing in all the techniques. The target dose coverage with split x-jaw VMAT was superior to both open and limited jaw planning techniques, with a statistically significant difference in the intermediate dose planning target volumes (PTVs) (PTV59.4), P < 0.05. However, the split technique's dose to the spinal cord and larynx was significantly lower (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The split x-jaw planning technique of VMAT can be adapted for larger PTVs requiring an x-jaw of more than 15 cm. The only concern with this technique is the increased MU.

Prediction of auditory brain stem responses damage in patients with head-and-neck cancers receiving radiotherapy using the functional assays of normal tissue complication probability models.

AIM: The purpose of this study was to set four NTCP models on clinical data and develop a model that calculates the possibility of hearing damage due to irradiation of healthy and at-risk brainstem tissue. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ABR tests were performed on 50 head-and-neck cancer patients three years after radiotherapy for evaluation of lesions in a part of the auditory nerve or the auditory pathway in the brainstem. RESULTS: It indicated a significant difference in the latency of the waves assessed by the ABR test between the two groups. The paired sample t-test indicated the latency time of waves I, III, V, I-III, and I-V (P < 0.001) in the right ear, and in the left ear latency time of waves III, V, I-III, I-V, and III-V (P < 0.001) were significantly higher in the case group's ear than those in the control group. The confidence interval of the fitted parameters was 95% for NTCP models. ABR test's binary outcome with differential dose-volume histograms (dDVHs) was calculated and imported as input to the NTCP modeling. The values of the parameters n = 2.3-2.9 and the value s = 1 were obtained, which indicated that the brainstem organ is seriality. CONCLUSION: The best model ranked for the prediction of brainstem hearing damage was the logit model, which had the lowest Akaike value. The nervousness of the auditory organ of the brainstem (VIII nerve) can be declared as one of the reasons for being independent of the received dose.

Role of external radiation in benign tumors: A clinical outcome and safety audit of 7 years from a tertiary care center in India.

PURPOSE: Radiotherapy (RT) is a well-established modality for treating malignancies, but its role in treatment of benign lesions has not been well explored. Herein, we present a retrospective analysis of a 7-year data regarding the benefit and the safety profile of RT for treating benign tumors in our institute. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data of 23 patients who received RT for benign tumors from January 2015 to April 2022 were retrieved, and a retrospective analysis was conducted. All the pertinent demographic data, treatment and follow-up data were retrieved. The most common presentations were nasopharyngeal angiofibroma, vertebral hemangioma, paraganglioma, and others. The most common sites of occurrence were head and neck (43%) and paravertebral region (22%). Volumetric modulated arc therapy was the most commonly employed RT technique (39%), followed by three-dimensional conformal RT (34%) and two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy (26%). The median RT dose delivered was 36 Gy (range: 20-54 Gy). RESULTS: The median follow-up duration was 53 months (range: 3-120 months). Nine (39%) patients had progressive disease with a median time to progression of 8 months (range: 1-30 months). The median disease-free survival (DFS) was 70 months, while the 1-, 3-, and 5-year DFS rates were 97%, 88%, and 62%, respectively. Four patients (17%) died, all due to disease progression. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates was 97%, 85%, and 50%, respectively. The rate of radiation-induced cancer (RIC) was 0% as none of the patients had developed RIC secondary to radiation. CONCLUSION: RT is a safe and an effective option to manage benign tumors either in an adjuvant setting or in inoperable patients requiring definitive treatment, as well as in a setting to alleviate symptoms, providing excellent survival benefits. However, further prospective studies with much higher sample size are required to establish the absolute benefit and to estimate the risk of RIC, which will further direct for a better utilization of RT in treating benign tumors.

Clinical and toxicity outcomes with 3D based-HDR surface mold brachytherapy in skin cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Surface mold brachytherapy (SMBT) is an established treatment modality in skin cancer, especially in accessible areas, and has shown comparable outcomes to surgery. We have presented our results for the skin tumor treatment with SMBT treated with high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy in terms of clinical outcomes and toxicity at our institute. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, 15 patients with skin cancer were treated with customized tube-based SMBT at our institute between January 2019 and July 2021. The patients were treated using HDR-brachytherapy using Iridium-192. The median dose was 40 Gy in 10 fractions. The dosimetric parameters were assessed, and patients were followed up as per the institutional protocol. All patients underwent individualized CT-based planning. Skin toxicity was assessed using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). RESULTS: With the majority of the patients being male, the median age was 59 years and the most common site affected was the face (8/15; 53.3%). Among the 15 cases, five were squamous cell carcinoma, nine were basal cell carcinoma, and a single case of sebaceous cell carcinoma. The median depth of invasion was 4 mm, and the median catheter-to-surface distance was 1 mm. The complete response rate among the 10 definitive cases was 90% and partial response in one case. The treatment was well-tolerated with no grade 3-5 toxicities. The median V95% and V90% were 94.8% and 97.1%, respectively. The mean coverage index (C.I.), dose non-uniformity ratio (DNR), and overdose volume index (ODI) were 0.97, 0.13, and 0.05, respectively. After a median follow-up of 12 months, none of the patients had recurrence. On assessment of DLQI, the scores were found to be significant in association with the tumor size and tumor site with scores favoring <2 cm and non-exposed area lesions. CONCLUSION: SMBT is a safe and effective treatment modality for skin tumors providing excellent response and cosmetic outcomes. It is well-tolerated and a non-invasive option for elderly patients with comorbidities and lesions in inoperable areas.

A prospective study on the effect of tumor shrinkage on exit fluence gamma pass rate in high precision radiotherapy and influence of phantom setup error in patient-specific quality assurance.

PURPOSE: Objective parameters for decision on adaptive radiotherapy depend on patient, tumor and treatment related factors. Present study reports geometric uncertainties occurring during high precision radiotherapy, beam fluence analysis and serial exit dose measurement as a patient-specific tool for adaptive radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Serial exit dose fluence of 24 patients (at baseline and mid-treatment) undergoing IMRT/VMAT treatment were measured. Baseline and midtreatment exit dose evaluation was done using gafchromic films in predefined region of interest. Difference of volume of GTV at baseline (from simulation CT scan) and midtreatment CBCT scan was calculated (ΔGTV). RESULTS: Population based systematic errors (mm) were 4.15, 2.26, 0.88 and random errors (mm) were 2.56, 3.69, and 2.03 in mediolateral (ML), craniocaudal (CC) and anteroposterior (AP) directions respectively. Gamma pass rate reduced with incremental shift. For a 5 mm shift, maximum deviation was found in anteroposterior axis (22.16 ± 7.50) and lowest in mediolateral axis (12.85 ± 4.95). On serial measurement of exit dose fluence, tumor shrinkage significantly influenced gamma pass rate. The mean gamma pass rate was significantly different between groups with 50% shrinkage of tumor volume (86.36 vs 96.24, P = 0.008, on multivariate analysis P = 0.026). CONCLUSION: Rapid fall of gamma pass rate was observed for set up error of ≥3 mm. Serial measurement of exit dose fluence by radiochromic film is a feasible method of exit dose comparison in IMRT/VMAT, where EPID dosimetry is not available with linear accelerator configuration. Our study suggests that there is a significant difference between gamma pass rates of baseline and mid treatment exit dose fluence with greater than 50% tumor shrinkage.

Analysis of the treatment planning metrics and their correlation with morphology of intracranial lesions in Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery.

BACKGROUND: Gamma Knife Radiosurgery (GKRS) has established a role in treating various benign brain pathologies. The radiosurgery planning necessitates a proper understanding of radiation dose distribution in relation to the target lesion and surrounding eloquent area. The quality of a radiosurgery plan is determined by various planning parameters. Here, we have reviewed various GKRS planning parameters and analyzed their correlation with the morphology of treated brain lesions. METHOD: A total of 430 treatment plans (71 meningioma, 133 vestibular schwannoma/VS, 150 arteriovenous malformation/AVM, 76 pituitary adenoma/PA treated with GKRS between December 2013 and May 2023) were analyzed for target coverage (TC), conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), and gradient index (GI). RESULT: The values of CIPaddick and CILomax for PA were lower and differed significantly from meningioma, VS, and AVM. The value of HI for PA was higher and differed significantly when compared with meningioma, VS, and AVM. The values of HI for AVM were also significantly higher than VS and meningioma. The mean GI was 3.02, 2.92, 3.03, and 2.88 for meningioma, VS, AVM, and PA, respectively. The value of GI for meningioma and AVM was significantly higher when compared with the values for VS and PA. The mean TC was 0.94 for meningioma, 0.96 for VS, 0.95 for AVM, and 0.90 for PA. The value TC of PA was lower and differed significantly when compared with VS, AVM, and meningioma. Lesions with a volume of ≤1 cc had poor planning metrics as the spillage of radiation may be higher. CONCLUSION: The GKRS planning parameters depend on the size, shape, nature, and location of intracranial lesions. Therefore, each treatment plan needs to be evaluated thoroughly and a long-term follow-up is needed to establish their relation with clinical outcome.

Low-dose radiation therapy for COVID-19 pneumonia: Comparison of dosimetry and life-time attributable risk of cancer with conventional AP-PA fields and bone marrow sparing VMAT.

PURPOSE: Low-dose radiation therapy (LDRT) to lungs did show encouraging results in COVID-19 patients in some clinical trials. However, there has been some concern regarding the long-term risk of radiation-induced cancer (RIC). Compared to the conventional AP-PA field technique, volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) can potentially reduce the dose to the marrow and other organs at risk (OARs) and thus minimize the risk of cancer. We designed a dosimetry study to study if VMAT can reduce the exposure to the marrow and other OAR doses and curtail the estimated life-time attributable risk (LAR) of cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrieved the computed tomography scan data of 10 patients (aged 40-60 years, median 48 years) who have been already treated for any malignancy in the region of the thorax. A dose of 1.0 Gy in single fraction was prescribed to both lungs. All the organs were delineated as per the established guidelines. The dosimetry achieved by the two plans was compared to find the difference. Mean OAR doses were used to estimate the LAR for both plans and compared. RESULTS: Planning target volume coverage parameters like conformity index and homogeneity index were significantly better with VMAT (P value < 0.05 for all). The mean dose to most OARs was significantly lower with VMAT (P value < 0.05 for all). The mean dose to the marrow was significantly lower with VMAT (59.05 vs 81.9 cGy with P value < 0.05). The overall LAR was significantly lower with VMAT as compared to the conventional plan (0.357% vs 0.398%, P value < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Compared to the conventional technique, VMAT provides better OAR dosimetry for lung irradiation (a prescription dose of 1.0 Gy or more) in COVID-19 pneumonia. VMAT significantly reduces the risk of RIC. We therefore suggest if lung LDRT is used for COVID-19 patients, VMAT is the preferred technique for a prescription dose of ≥1.0 Gy.

Pulmonary fibrosis prevalence after adjuvant radiotherapy of Iranian patients with breast cancer: A single-center cross-sectional study.

AIMS: This study aims to investigate the incidence rate of pulmonary fibrosis as a late radiotherapy complication and identify the associated dosimetric and demographic factors using radiological findings between Iranian patients with breast cancer. METHODS AND MATERIAL: Breast cancer patients treated at the education hospital of Shohada-e Tajrish Hospital, Tehran, Iran, from 2017 to 2021 were considered. Patients have included for whom a secondary chest CT scan was available at least six months after radiotherapy. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) treatment plans were exported. Demographic features and data on underlying lung diseases, diabetes, and smoking history were extracted. RESULTS: A total of 250 patients were included in the study with a mean age of 46.1 ± 7.5 yrs and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 24.5 ± 4.2 kg/m2. Pulmonary fibrosis was detected for sixty-two cases. A significant relationship was obtained between the ipsilateral lung DVH parameters of patients with pulmonary fibrosis (P value < 0.05). The V5Gy, V10Gy, V13Gy, V20Gy, V30Gy, MLD, and DMax for individuals with pulmonary fibrosis were significantly higher than those without this injury. CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary fibrosis was distinguished for 25% of the breast cancer cases at least six months after adjuvant radiotherapy. A significant relationship between the DVH parameters, underlying lung disease, diabetes, radiotherapy fields (i.e., Breast + LN + SC or Breast/Chest-wall only), age, and BMI with the frequency of the ipsilateral pulmonary fibrosis was obtained. V13Gy and V30Gy of the ipsilateral lung may be the most predictor of pulmonary fibrosis incidence.

Automatic planning for functional lung avoidance radiotherapy based on function-guided beam angle selection and plan optimization.

Objective.This study aims to develop a fully automatic planning framework for functional lung avoidance radiotherapy (AP-FLART).Approach.The AP-FLART integrates a dosimetric score-based beam angle selection method and a meta-optimization-based plan optimization method, both of which incorporate lung function information to guide dose redirection from high functional lung (HFL) to low functional lung (LFL). It is applicable to both contour-based FLART (cFLART) and voxel-based FLART (vFLART) optimization options. A cohort of 18 lung cancer patient cases underwent planning-CT and SPECT perfusion scans were collected. AP-FLART was applied to generate conventional RT (ConvRT), cFLART, and vFLART plans for all cases. We compared automatic against manual ConvRT plans as well as automatic ConvRT against FLART plans, to evaluate the effectiveness of AP-FLART. Ablation studies were performed to evaluate the contribution of function-guided beam angle selection and plan optimization to dose redirection.Main results.Automatic ConvRT plans generated by AP-FLART exhibited similar quality compared to manual counterparts. Furthermore, compared to automatic ConvRT plans, HFL mean dose,V20, andV5were significantly reduced by 1.13 Gy (p< .001), 2.01% (p< .001), and 6.66% (p< .001) respectively for cFLART plans. Besides, vFLART plans showed a decrease in lung functionally weighted mean dose by 0.64 Gy (p< .01),fV20by 0.90% (p= 0.099), andfV5by 5.07% (p< .01) respectively. Though inferior conformity was observed, all dose constraints were well satisfied. The ablation study results indicated that both function-guided beam angle selection and plan optimization significantly contributed to dose redirection.Significance.AP-FLART can effectively redirect doses from HFL to LFL without severely degrading conventional dose metrics, producing high-quality FLART plans. It has the potential to advance the research and clinical application of FLART by providing labor-free, consistent, and high-quality plans.