Less is more: Outcomes of surgical approaches to rectal prolapse in patients with cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cirrhosis have increased risk of perioperative complications, and surgical management of concomitant rectal prolapse poses a challenge in these patients. Given the paucity of data informing this, our study aimed to evaluate postoperative outcomes. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for patients undergoing rectal prolapse repair from 2011 to 2019. Patients were stratified by cirrhosis (Model for End-Stage Liver Disease ≥10) and no cirrhosis. Bivariate and multivariable regression analyses were used to compare comorbidities, repair types, and identify predictors of postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: We identified 2,234 patients: 332 patients with cirrhosis (Model for End-Stage Liver Disease 14 [10-34]). Patients with cirrhosis were older (76 ± 12 years vs 69 ± 17, P < .001) with increased comorbidities (eg, heart failure, lung disease), greater mortality (3.6% vs 0.8%, P < .001), and complication rates compared with patients without cirrhosis. Readmission rates and longer hospital stays also were observed in patients with cirrhosis. A total of 52% of NCPs underwent abdominal repair compared with 62% of patients with cirrhosis who received perineal repair; greater complication rates were observed for abdominal repairs in both groups (patients without cirrhosis 11.4%, patients with cirrhosis 25%). Predictors of greater complication rates in patients with cirrhosis included abdominal repair (odds ratio 2.7, 95% confidence interval 1.4-5, P = .002) and presence of ascites (odds ratio 4.6, 95% confidence interval 1.1-20, P = .04). CONCLUSION: Overall, abdominal repairs have greater complication rates even when controlling for Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score and presence of ascites. The Delorme procedure had the lowest complication rates. Additional evidence is needed to recommend a preferred surgical approach to rectal prolapse repair in patients with cirrhosis.

Analysis of factors that indicated surgery in 400 patients submitted to a complete diagnostic workup for obstructed defecation syndrome and rectal prolapse using a supervised machine learning algorithm.

BACKGROUND: Patient selection is extremely important in obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) and rectal prolapse (RP) surgery. This study assessed factors that guided the indications for ODS and RP surgery and their specific role in our decision-making process using a machine learning approach. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of a long-term prospective observational study on female patients reporting symptoms of ODS who underwent a complete diagnostic workup from January 2010 to December 2021 at an academic tertiary referral center. Clinical, defecographic, and other functional tests data were assessed. A supervised machine learning algorithm using a classification tree model was performed and tested. RESULTS: A total of 400 patients were included. The factors associated with a significantly higher probability of undergoing surgery were follows: as symptoms, perineal splinting, anal or vaginal self-digitations, sensation of external RP, episodes of fecal incontinence and soiling; as physical examination features, evidence of internal and external RP, rectocele, enterocele, or anterior/middle pelvic organs prolapse; as defecographic findings, intra-anal and external RP, rectocele, incomplete rectocele emptying, enterocele, cystocele, and colpo-hysterocele. Surgery was less indicated in patients with dyssynergia, severe anxiety and depression. All these factors were included in a supervised machine learning algorithm. The model showed high accuracy on the test dataset (79%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Symptoms assessment and physical examination proved to be fundamental, but other functional tests should also be considered. By adopting a machine learning model in further ODS and RP centers, indications for surgery could be more easily and reliably identified and shared.

Mental health disorders as a risk factor in young patients with rectal prolapse.

BACKGROUND: Rectal prolapse (RP) typically presents in the elderly, though it can present in younger patients lacking traditional risk factors. The current study compares medical and mental health history, presentation, and outcomes for young and older patients with RP. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective review of patients who underwent abdominal repair of RP between 2005 and 2019. Individuals were dichotomized into two groups based on age greater or less than 40 years. RESULTS: Of 156 patients, 25 were < 40. Younger patients had higher rates of diagnosed mental health disorders (80% vs 41%, p < 0.001), more likely to take SSRIs (p = .02), SNRIs (p = .021), anxiolytics (p = 0.033), and antipsychotics (p < 0.001). Younger patients had lower preoperative incontinence but higher constipation. Both groups had low rates of recurrence (9.1% vs 11.6%, p = 0.73). CONCLUSIONS: Young patients with RP present with higher concomitant mental health diagnoses and represent unique risk factors characterized by chronic straining compared to pelvic floor laxity.

Combined Robotic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy and Sacrocolpopexy for Multicompartmental Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

BACKGROUND: Multispecialty management should be the preferred approach for the treatment of pelvic floor dysfunction because there is often multicompartmental prolapse. OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety of combined robotic ventral mesh rectopexy and either uterine or vaginal fixation for the treatment of multicompartmental pelvic organ prolapse at our institution. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTINGS: Tertiary referral academic center. PATIENTS: All patients who underwent a robotic approach and combined procedure and whose cases were discussed at a biweekly pelvic floor multidisciplinary team meeting. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Operative time, intraoperative blood loss and complications, postoperative pelvic organ prolapse quantification score, length of stay, 30-day morbidity, and readmission. RESULTS: From 2018 to 2021, there were 321 operations for patients with multicompartmental prolapse. The mean age was 63.4 years. The predominant pelvic floor dysfunction was rectal prolapse in 170 cases (60%). Pelvic organ prolapse quantification scores were II in 146 patients (53%), III in 121 patients (44%), and IV in 9 patients (3%); 315 of 323 cases included robotic ventral mesh rectopexy (98%). Sacrocolpopexy or sacrohysteropexy was performed in 281 patients (89%). Other procedures included 175 hysterectomies (54%), 104 oophorectomies (32%), 151 sling procedures (47%), 149 posterior repairs (46%), and 138 cystocele repairs (43%). The operative time for ventral mesh rectopexy was 211 minutes and for combined pelvic floor reconstruction was 266 minutes. Average length of stay was 1.6 days. Eight patients were readmitted within 30 days: 1 with a severe headache and 7 with postoperative complications (2.5%), such as pelvic collection and perirectal collection, both requiring radiologic drainage. Four complications required reoperation: epidural abscess, small-bowel obstruction, missed enterotomy requiring resection, and urinary retention requiring sling revision. There were no mortalities. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective single-center study. CONCLUSIONS: A combined robotic approach for multicompartmental pelvic organ prolapse is a safe and viable procedure with a relatively low rate of morbidity and no mortality. This is the highest volume series of combined robotic pelvic floor reconstruction in the literature and demonstrates a low complication rate and short length of stay. See Video Abstract . RECTOPEXIA Y SACROCOLPOPEXIA ROBTICA VENTRAL COMBINADAS CON MALLA PARA EL PROLAPSO DE RGANOS PLVICOS MULTICOMPARTIMENTALES: ANTECEDENTES:El tratamiento multiespecializado debe ser el enfoque preferido para el tratamiento de la disfunción del suelo pélvico, ya que a menudo hay prolapso multicompartimental.OBJETIVO:Evaluar la seguridad de la rectopexia robótica combinada con malla ventral y fijación uterina o vaginal para el tratamiento del prolapso multicompartimental de órganos pélvicos en nuestra institución.DISEÑO:Análisis retrospectivo.AJUSTES:Centro académico de referencia terciarioPACIENTES:Todos los pacientes que se sometieron a un enfoque robótico y un procedimiento combinado y se discutieron en una reunión quincenal del equipo multidisciplinario sobre el piso pélvico.MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Tiempo operatorio, pérdida de sangre intraoperatoria y complicaciones. Puntuación de cuantificación del prolapso de órganos pélvicos posoperatorio, duración de la estancia hospitalaria, morbilidad a 30 días y reingreso.RESULTADOS:De 2018 a 2021, se realizaron 321 operaciones de pacientes con prolapso multicompartimental. La edad media fue 63.4 años. La disfunción del suelo pélvico predominante fue el prolapso rectal en 170 casos (60%). Las puntuaciones de cuantificación del prolapso de órganos pélvicos fueron II en 146 pacientes (53%), III en 121 (44%) y IV en 9 (3%); 315 de los 323 casos incluyeron rectopexia robótica de malla ventral (98%). Se realizó sacrocolpopexia o sacrohisteropexia en 281 pacientes (89%). Otros procedimientos incluyeron 175 histerectomías (54%), 104 ooforectomías (32%), 151 procedimientos de cabestrillo (47%), 149 reparaciones posteriores (46%) y 138 reparaciones de cistocele (43%). El tiempo operatorio para la rectopexia con malla ventral fue de 211 minutos y la reconstrucción combinada del piso pélvico de 266 minutos. La estancia media fue de 1.6 días. Ocho pacientes reingresaron dentro de los 30 días, 1 con dolor de cabeza intenso y 7 pacientes con complicaciones posoperatorias (2.5%): colección pélvica y colección perirrectal, ambas requirieron drenaje radiológico. Cuatro complicaciones requirieron reoperación: absceso epidural, obstrucción del intestino delgado, enterotomía omitida que requirió resección y retención urinaria que requirió revisión del cabestrillo. No hubo mortalidades.LIMITACIONES:Estudio retrospectivo unicéntrico.CONCLUSIONES:Un enfoque robótico combinado para el prolapso multicompartimental de órganos pélvicos es un procedimiento seguro y viable con una tasa relativamente baja de morbilidad y ninguna mortalidad. Esta es la serie de mayor volumen de reconstrucción robótica combinada del suelo pélvico en la literatura y demuestra una baja tasa de complicaciones y una estancia hospitalaria corta. (Traducción-Dr. Aurian Garcia Gonzalez )See Editorial on page 195.

Laparoscopic modified mesh rectopexy: medium-term results of a novel approach for external rectal prolapse.

AIM: Rectal prolapse is a common and significantly debilitating condition. Surgical correction is usually required. The two most common abdominal approaches are ventral mesh rectopexy and posterior suture rectopexy. Both may be complicated, respectively, by either mesh-related complications or significant postoperative constipation. We report the outcome of a novel rectopexy operation which combines aspects of both the aforementioned approaches, for the treatment of external rectal prolapse (ERP). METHOD: The technique involves laparoscopic partial posterior-lateral rectal mobilization of the rectum with posterior suture fixation to the sacral promontory and placement of an absorbable mesh in the rectovaginal space. Data were collected on postoperative complications, prolapse recurrence, mesh-related complications and the assessment of quality of life. RESULTS: Eighty patients underwent a modified mesh rectopexy for ERP. Seventy-seven were women. The median age was 67.5 years. Almost a third had undergone a previous rectal prolapse repair. Recurrences were seen in 11 (13.8%). No mesh-related complications were seen. Eleven patients reported postoperative constipation. CONCLUSION: The laparoscopic modified mesh rectopexy may be a safe and effective operation for the treatment of ERP.

Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy vs. transperineal mesh repair for obstructed defecation syndrome associated with rectocele: comparison of selectively distributed patients.

PURPOSE: Obstructed defecation syndrome represents 50-60% of patients with symptoms of constipation. We aimed to compare the two frequently performed surgical methods, laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy and transperineal mesh repair, for this condition in terms of functional and surgical outcomes. METHODS: This study is a retrospective review of 131 female patients who were diagnosed with obstructed defecation syndrome, attributed to rectocele with or without rectal intussusception, enterocele, hysterocele or cystocele, and who underwent either laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy or transperineal mesh repair. Patients were evaluated for surgical outcomes based on the operative time, the length of hospital stay, operative complications, using prospectively designed charts. Functional outcome was assessed by using the Initial Measurement of Patient-Reported Pelvic Floor Complaints Tool. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients diagnosed with complex rectocele underwent laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy, and 80 patients diagnosed with simple rectocele underwent transperineal mesh repair. Mean age was found to be 50.35 ± 13.51 years, and mean parity 2.14 ± 1.47. Obstructed defecation symptoms significantly improved in both study groups, as measured by the Colorectal Anal Distress Inventory, Constipation Severity Instrument and Patient Assessment of Constipation-Symptoms scores. Minor postoperative complications including wound dehiscence (n = 3) and wound infection (n = 2) occurred in the transperineal mesh repair group. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy and transperineal mesh repair are efficient and comparable techniques in terms of improvement in constipation symptoms related to obstructed defecation syndrome. A selective distribution of patients with or without multicompartmental prolapse to one of the treatment arms might be the preferred strategy.

Trans-anal small bowel evisceration in a patient with a perforated rectal prolapse.

SUMMARY: An 85-year-old lady with a history of chronic constipation presented with gangrenous small bowel protruding from the anus through a hole in a prolapsed rectum. At surgery, a resection of 125 cm of gangrenous small bowel was performed in the perineum prior to laparotomy, where rectal repair was followed by the creation of a sigmoid loop colostomy and double-barrel ileostomy. This avoided an intrabdominal anastomosis which was felt likely to complicate due to the lady's intraoperative haemodynamic instability requiring inotropic support. This tailored management of a trans-anal small bowel evisceration through a rectal prolapse resulted in recovery and a patient who was content with her stomas and preferred to live with them rather than have continuity restored.

Incarcerated Prolapsed Sigmoid Intussusception Presenting as Rectal Prolapse Without a Lead Point.

This case series presents two patients with symptoms consistent with acute rectal prolapse. The prolapses were subsequently found to be sigmoid intussusception that had prolapsed through the anus without rectal prolapse and without any intraluminal pathology or lead point. Both were recognised on examination and underwent colonic resection rather than proctectomy.

A 54-Year-Old Man with a Large Rectal Prolapse Treated with Perineal Proctosigmoidectomy with Levatorplasty (Altemeier Procedure): Presentation of Case and Review of Literature.

BACKGROUND The surgical procedure of perineal proctosigmoidectomy with levatorplasty is known as the Altemeier procedure. This report presents the case of a 54-year-old man with a large rectal prolapse treated with perineal proctosigmoidectomy with levatorplasty (Altemeier procedure). CASE REPORT A 54-year-old male had a large bulging in the rectum since 5 months ago. At first, the bulging was small, but its size had increased to approximately 10 cm at presentation. The patient also stated that the bulging used to reduce spontaneously after defecating or manually by applying sufficient pressure, but lately it had been irreducible. Another concern was chronic constipation over the last few years, which was treated with over-the-counter laxatives and stool softeners. Physical examination of the perianal region revealed a full-thickness, irreducible, prolapsed bowel segment, approximately 10 cm long, with multiple mucosal ulcerations. Grade V rectal prolapse was diagnosed. Follow-up at 7, 14, and 30 days after surgery showed complete resolution of symptoms and no recurrence. CONCLUSIONS Individually tailored and prompt surgical treatment for all patients with rectal prolapse is vital. The Altemeier procedure, which has good efficacy with low morbidity, complications, and recurrence, should be considered in elderly patients with an irreducible, large rectal prolapse.

A network meta-analysis of surgical treatments of complete rectal prolapse.

PURPOSE: Surgical treatment of complete rectal prolapse can be undertaken via an abdominal or a perineal approach. The present network meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcomes of different abdominal and perineal procedures for rectal prolapse in terms of recurrence, complications, and improvement in fecal incontinence (FI). METHODS: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted. Randomized clinical trials comparing two or more procedures for the treatment of complete rectal prolapse were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the ROB-2 tool. The main outcomes were recurrence of full-thickness rectal prolapse, complications, operation time, and improvement in FI. RESULTS: Nine randomized controlled trials with 728 patients were included. The follow-up ranged between 12 and 47 months. Posterior mesh rectopexy had significantly lower odds of recurrence than did the Altemeier procedure (logOR, - 12.75; 95% credible intervals, - 40.91, - 1.75), Delorme procedure (- 13.10; - 41.26, - 2.09), resection rectopexy (- 11.98; - 41.36, - 0.19), sponge rectopexy (- 13.19; - 42.87, - 0.54), and sutured rectopexy (- 13.12; - 42.58, - 1.50), but similar odds to ventral mesh rectopexy (- 12.09; - 41.7, 0.03). Differences among the procedures in complications, operation time, and improvement in FI were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Posterior mesh rectopexy ranked best with the lowest recurrence while perineal procedures ranked worst with the highest recurrence rates.

Outcomes of rectal prolapse surgery in patients with benign joint hypermobility syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Rectal prolapse is a debilitating disorder of the pelvic floor, and treatment outcomes are variable. Previous studies have identified underlying benign joint hypermobility syndrome (BJHS) in some patients. We sought to determine the outcomes of these patients after undergoing ventral rectopexy surgery (VMR). METHODS: All consecutive patients who were referred to the pelvic floor unit at our institution between February 2010 and December 2011 were considered for recruitment into the study. Following recruitment, they were assessed using the Beighton criteria to determine the presence or absence of benign joint hypermobility syndrome. Both groups underwent similar surgical interventions and were then followed up. The need for revisional surgery was recorded in both groups. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients [34 normal; M:F, 1:6; median age 61 (range 22-84) years; 18 BJHS; M:F, 0:1; median age 52 (range 25-79) years] were recruited. A total of 42 patients completed the full 1-year follow-up (26 normal, 16 benign joint hypermobility syndrome). Patients with benign joint hypermobility syndrome were significantly younger (median age 52 versus 61 years, p < 0.001) with male to female ratio of 0:1 versus 1:6, respectively. In addition, they were significantly more likely to require revisional surgery than those without the condition (31% versus 8% p < 0.001). In most cases, this was in the form of a posterior stapled transanal resection of the rectum procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with BJHS presenting for rectal prolapse surgery were younger and are more likely to require further surgery for rectal prolapse recurrence than those without the condition.

Outcomes for men undergoing rectal prolapse surgery - a systematic review.

AIM: Rectal prolapse is considered rare in men but the prevalence can be high in certain populations. It is unclear which surgical approach offers lower recurrence rates and better functional outcomes in men. The aim of this work was to determine the recurrence rates, complications and functional outcomes after prolapse surgery in men. METHOD: The MEDLINE, EMBASE and Scopus databases were systematically searched to identify studies on outcomes following surgical management of full-thickness rectal prolapse in men (over 18 years of age) published between 1951 and September 2022. Outcomes of interest included recurrence rate after surgery, bowel function, urinary function, sexual function and postoperative complications. RESULTS: Twenty-eight studies involving 1751 men were included. Two papers focused exclusively on men. Twelve studies employed a mixture of abdominal approaches, ten employed perineal approaches and six compared both. The recurrence rate varied across studies, ranging from 0% to 34%. Sexual and urinary function were poorly reported, but the incidence of dysfunction appears low. CONCLUSION: The outcomes of rectal prolapse surgery in men are poorly studied with small sample sizes and variable outcomes reported. There is insufficient evidence to recommend a specific repair approach based on the recurrence rate and functional outcomes. Further studies are required to identify the optimal surgical approach for rectal prolapse in men.

A comparison of perineal stapled prolapse resection and the Altemeier procedure at 2 Canadian academic hospitals.

BACKGROUND: The preferred perineal repair method for full-thickness rectal prolapse is the Altemeier procedure, a perineal proctosigmoidectomy with handsewn anastomosis. A recently described variant of this procedure combines the resection and anastomosis into 1 step by means of linear and transverse stapling. There are few published data comparing the characteristics and outcomes of these 2 approaches. METHODS: This retrospective review, performed at 2 Canadian academic hospitals, compares surgical and cost outcomes between the perineal stapled prolapse resection (PSPR) and the Altemeier procedure. All patients who underwent these procedures between 2015 and 2019 were included. RESULTS: There were 25 patients in the PSPR group and 19 in the Altemeier group. Patients in the PSPR group were significantly older than those in the Altemeier group (81 [95% confidence interval (CI) 70-92] yr v. 74 [95% CI 63-85] yr; p = 0.047), had a lower body mass index (21.4 [95% CI 17.7-25.1] v. 24.4 [95% CI 18.5-30.3]; p = 0.042) and had equivalent American Society of Anesthesiologists scores (2.84 [95% CI 2.09-3.59] v. 2.68 [95% CI 1.93-3.43]; p = 0.49). The operative time for PSPR was significantly less (30.3 [95% CI 16.3-44.3] min v. 67 [95% CI 43-91] min; p < 0.001), as were the operative costs. Recurrence (28.0% v. 36.8%; p = 0.53) and complication rates were equivalent. CONCLUSION: PSPR is a safe, efficient and effective approach to perineal proctosigmoidectomy. It is associated with surgical outcomes comparable to those of the Altemeier procedure, but with a significant reduction in operative time and cost.

High Failure Rate Following Restorative Surgery for Rectal Prolapse in Systemic Sclerosis Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare autoimmune connective tissue disorder. Colonic disorders are reported in 70% of patients. Only a few cases of rectal prolapse surgical repair in SSc patients were published, demonstrating high recurrence rate following any restorative surgery. The aim of this study is to present our surgical experience combined with the reported cases of SSc patients who underwent surgical interventions for rectal prolapse. METHODS: We reviewed our data and the published reports in the English literature of patients with SSc who underwent surgery for rectal prolapse. We located 6 case reports, in addition to 3 patients who were operated in our center. RESULTS: A total of 19 procedures (9 patients) were included, among them 17 restorative surgeries and 2 low anterior resections (LAR) with end-colostomy. All patients were female (mean age 70.3). Index surgery was perineal rectosigmoidectomy in 5, abdominal resection rectopexy in 3, and LAR with colostomy in 1 patient. All patients following restorative surgery suffered from fecal incontinence. 5 patients (62.5%) who underwent restorative surgery required at least 1 re-operation. The 2 patients who underwent LAR and colostomy reported a complete resolution of anorectal symptoms with a major improvement in their quality of life. CONCLUSION: High recurrence rate is expected in SSc patients with rectal prolapse who undergo a restorative procedure. Low anterior resection and permanent colostomy provide an alternative surgical option to patients with SSc and prolapse in contrast to restorative surgery. We believe that this surgical approach should be offered for these patients.

Rectal Prolapse Pathological Features: Findings in Patients With Outlet Obstruction Treated With Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection.

BACKGROUND: Obstructed defecation syndrome is a common multifactorial disease for which treatment is based primarily on clinic presentation for the lack of reliable instrumental and anatomopathological criteria. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to analyze the pathological findings of the resected rectal specimens after stapled transanal rectal resection in patients affected by outlet obstruction. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS: University hospital. PATIENTS: Patients who underwent rectal resection for obstructed defecation syndrome due to internal rectal prolapse were included. INTERVENTIONS: Specimens of patients with obstructed defecation syndrome were analyzed through conventional histology and morphometric image analysis and compared with those of rectal specimens excised for oncological diseases. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Analysis of the anatomopathological impairments underlying rectal prolapse. RESULTS: From January 2017 to December 2020, 46 specimens from the stapled transanal rectal resection group were compared with 40 specimens from the control group. In the stapled transanal rectal resection group, conventional histology revealed 34 samples (73.9%) had moderate- to severe-grade fibrosis with moderate-grade nerve degeneration in 33 cases (71.7%). In the control group, conventional histology revealed the absence of fibrosis in 31 specimens (77.5%), whereas the absence of nerve degeneration was detected in 37 specimens (92.5%). In the stapled transanal rectal resection group, morphometric image analysis showed severe-grade fibrosis in 25 cases (54.4%) compared to only low-grade fibrosis in 11 cases (27.5%). LIMITATIONS: The small sample size and the retrospective design of the study were limitations. Moreover, there was no chance to use specimens from healthy volunteers as the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Stapled transanal rectal resection specimens showed a higher rate of fibrosis and nerve dysplasia, an important parameter that is typically not considered preoperatively and could lead patients with rectal prolapse to the best treatment approach. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B928 . CARACTERSTICAS ANATOMOPATOLGICAS EN EL PROLAPSO DE RECTO HALLAZGOS EN PACIENTES CON OBSTRUCCIN DEL TRACTO DE SALIDA TRATADOS CON RESECCIN RECTAL TRANSANAL CON GRAPAS: ANTECEDENTES:El síndrome de obstrucción del tracto de salida, es una afección multifactorial común, cuyo tratamiento está basado principalmente en la presentación clínica, ésto, debido a la falta de criterios confiables tanto instrumentales como anatomopatológicos.OBJETIVO:Analizamos los hallazgos histopatológicos de las piezas de resección rectal obtenidas por vía transanal mediante grapas, realizadas en pacientes que presentaban obstrucción del tracto de salida.DISEÑO:Este fue un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.AJUSTE:El escenario fue un hospital universitario.PACIENTES:Aquellos sometidos a resección rectal por síndrome obstructivo del tracto de salida causada por un prolapso rectal interno.INTERVENCIONES:Los especímenes de pacientes con síndrome obstructivo defecatorio fueron analizados mediante histología convencional y análisis de imágenes morfométricas, comparados con especímenes rectales resecados por enfermedad oncológica.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El resultado primario se concentró en la investigación de las deficiencias anatomopatológicas subyacentes del prolapso rectal interno.RESULTADOS:Desde enero de 2017 hasta diciembre de 2020, se compararon 46 especímenes del grupo de resección rectal transanal con grapas con 40 especímenes del grupo de control. En histología convencional, el grupo de resección rectal transanal con grapas, 34 muestras (73,9%) presentaron un grado de fibrosis moderada-severa con un grado moderado de degeneración neurógena en 33 casos (71,7%). En el grupo control, la histología convencional reveló ausencia de fibrosis en 31 especímenes (77,5 %), mientras que la ausencia de degeneración neurógena se detectó en 37 controles (92,5 %). En el grupo de resección rectal transanal con grapas, el análisis de imágenes morfométricas mostró fibrosis moderada y fibrosis severa en 19 (41,3%) y 25 (54,4%) casos, respectivamente. En el grupo control, el análisis de imágenes morfométricas mostró solo un bajo grado de fibrosis en 11 casos (27,5%). Se encontró una diferencia significativa en todos los grados de fibrosis y displasia neurógena entre los grupos en las evaluaciones de análisis de imagen morfométrica e histología convencional (p < 0,001).LIMITACIONES:El pequeño tamaño de la muestra y el diseño retrospectivo del estudio. Además, no existe la posibilidad de utilizar un grupo de control con muestras de voluntarios sanos.CONCLUSIONES:Los especímenes de resección rectal transanal con grapas mostraron una mayor tasa de fibrosis y displasia neurógena, parámetro importante que actualmente no está considerado antes de la operación y en un futuro muy cercano podría orientar a los pacientes con prolapso rectal interno hacia un mejor enfoque de tratamiento. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B928 . (Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo ).

Pelvic pain is a common prolapse symptom and improvement after ventral mesh rectopexy is more frequent than deterioration or de novo pain.

AIM: The aim of this work was to assess the relationship between pelvic pain and rectal prolapse both before prolapse surgery and in the long term after ventral mesh rectopexy (VMR). METHOD: Patients undergoing VMR between 2004 and 2017 were contacted. Outcomes including the severity of pelvic pain were recorded using a numeric rating scale. RESULTS: Four hundred and seventy eight of the 749 patients (64%) were successfully contacted. Of these, 39% reported pre-existing pelvic pain prior to VMR (group A) and 61% were pain free (group B). The median follow-up time was 8.0 years (interquartile range 5.0-10.0 years). Symptoms of obstructed defaecation were significantly more common (p = 0.002) in group A (91/187, 49%) than in group B (101/291, 35%). In contrast, faecal incontinence was more common (p = 0.007) in group B (75/291, 26%) than in group A (29/187, 15%). In group A, 76% showed improvement in pelvic pain after VMR: 61% were pain free and 39% had partial improvement in their pre-existing pelvic pain. Patients with persistent pelvic pain were younger (p = 0.01) and more likely to have revisional surgery after VMR (p = 0.0003), but there was no relation to the indication for surgery (p = 0.59). In group B, 15% reported de novo pelvic pain after VMR, and this was more common in women under 50 years old (p = 0.001), when obstructed defaecation was the indication (p = 0.03), in mesh erosion (p = <0.05) and when associated with revisional surgery (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Pelvic pain is common (39%) in patients undergoing prolapse surgery, and VMR improves this pain in most patients (76%). However, a significant number of patients fail to improve (12%), experience worsening of pain (12%) or develop de novo pelvic pain (15%).

Cap-assisted endoscopic sclerotherapy is effective for rectal mucosal prolapse associated outlet obstructive constipation.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Outlet obstructive constipation (OOC) is a common type of chronic constipation that is usually caused by internal hemorrhoids (IH) and rectal mucosal prolapse (RMP). Cap-assisted endoscopic sclerotherapy (CAES) was demonstrated to be effective in the treatment of IH and RMP. This study explored the efficacy of CAES in treating OOC associated with IH and RMP. METHODS: Thirty-one patients (15 males and 16 females) were diagnosed with OOC after colonoscopy and anorectal manometry (AM). CAES was used to treat IH and RMP. The self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), self-rating depression scale (SDS), and Wexner constipation score (WCS) were used to assess patients at baseline and at the end of follow-up. AM tests were performed before and after CAES. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 56.19 ± 7.969 years, and the follow-up time was 2.875 ± 3.703 months. After CAES treatment, subjective indices, including frequency of bowel movements (p < 0.05), defecation time (p < 0.05), SAS (p < 0.05), SDS (p < 0.05), and WCS (p < 0.05), were significantly improved. AM showed that the anal relaxation rate (p < 0.05), maximum squeeze pressure (p < 0.05), and rectal residual pressure (p < 0.05) were significantly improved. The ratio of Bristol stool form scale typeIII-Vincreased from 12.5 % to 56.25 % (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: CAES is effective for treating OOC caused by IH and RMP. The relief of OOC symptoms could improve anxiety and depression symptoms associated with the disease.