Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 901
Filter
1.
Rev Med Virol ; 34(4): e2569, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38986606

ABSTRACT

We aimed to assess the performance of Ag-RDT and RT-qPCR with regard to detecting infectious SARS-CoV-2 in cell cultures, as their diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) compared to virus isolation remains largely unknown. We searched three databases up to 15 December 2021 for DTA studies. The bivariate model was used to synthesise the estimates. Risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2/C. Twenty studies (2605 respiratory samples) using cell culture and at least one molecular test were identified. All studies were at high or unclear risk of bias in at least one domain. Three comparative DTA studies reported results on Ag-RDT and RT-qPCR against cell culture. Two studies evaluated RT-qPCR against cell culture only. Fifteen studies evaluated Ag-RDT against cell culture as reference standard in RT-qPCR-positive samples. For Ag-RDT, summary sensitivity was 93% (95% CI 78; 98%) and specificity 87% (95% CI 70; 95%). For RT-qPCR, summary sensitivity (continuity-corrected) was 98% (95% CI 95; 99%) and specificity 45% (95% CI 28; 63%). In studies relying on RT-qPCR-positive subsamples (n = 15), the summary sensitivity of Ag-RDT was 93% (95% CI 92; 93%) and specificity 63% (95% CI 63; 63%). Ag-RDT show moderately high sensitivity, detecting most but not all samples demonstrated to be infectious based on virus isolation. Although RT-qPCR exhibits high sensitivity across studies, its low specificity to indicate infectivity raises the question of its general superiority in all clinical settings. Study findings should be interpreted with caution due to the risk of bias, heterogeneity and the imperfect reference standard for infectivity.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensitivity and Specificity , Humans , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/virology , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/standards , Cell Culture Techniques/methods , COVID-19 Testing/methods , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing/methods , Rapid Diagnostic Tests
3.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun ; 711: 149909, 2024 Jun 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38615573

ABSTRACT

RNA analysis has shown great value in forensic science, such as body fluids and tissue identification, postmortem interval estimation, biological age prediction, etc. Currently, most RNA follow-up experiments involve reverse transcription (RT) procedures. It has been shown that the RT step is variable and has a greater impact on subsequent data analysis, especially for forensic trace samples. However, the pattern of variation between different RNA template inputs and complementary DNA (cDNA) yield is unclear. In this study, a series of 2-fold gradient dilutions of RNA standards (1 µg/µL - 0.24 ng/µL) and forensic samples (including blood samples, saliva samples, bloodstains, and saliva stains) were reverse-transcribed using EasyQuick RT MasterMix. The obtained cDNA was quantified by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) to assess the RT yield of the ACTB gene. The results showed that the 125 ng RNA template had the highest RT yield in a 10 µL RT reaction system with the selected kit. For all stain samples, the RT yield improved as the amount of RNA template input increased since RNA quantities were below 125 ng. As many commercialized reverse transcription kits using different kinds of enzymes are available for forensic RNA research, we recommend that systematic experiments should be performed in advance to determine the amount of RNA input at the optimum RT yield when using any kit for reverse transcription experiments.


Subject(s)
RNA , Humans , RNA/genetics , RNA/analysis , Reverse Transcription , Saliva/metabolism , Saliva/chemistry , Forensic Genetics/methods , Forensic Genetics/standards , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/standards , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Reference Standards , DNA, Complementary/genetics , Blood Stains , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Polymerase Chain Reaction/standards
4.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 109(2): 116287, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38574444

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The study aimed to construct a standardized quality control management procedure (QCMP) and access its accuracy in the quality control of COVID-19 reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). METHODS: Considering the initial RT-PCR results without applying QCMP as the gold standard, a large-scale diagnostic accuracy study including 4,385,925 participants at three COVID-19 RT-PCR testing sites in China, Foshan (as a pilot test), Guangzhou and Shenyang (as validation sites), was conducted from May 21, 2021, to December 15, 2022. RESULTS: In the pilot test, the RT-PCR with QCMP had a high accuracy of 99.18% with 100% specificity, 100% positive predictive value (PPV), and 99.17% negative predictive value (NPV). The rate of retesting was reduced from 1.98% to 1.16%. Its accuracy was then consistently validated in Guangzhou and Shenyang. CONCLUSIONS: The RT-PCR with QCMP showed excellent accuracy in identifying true negative COVID-19 and relieved the labor and time spent on retesting.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Quality Control , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensitivity and Specificity , Humans , China , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing/methods , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing/standards , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/standards , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Pilot Projects
6.
Eur J Hum Genet ; 30(9): 1051-1059, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35676339

ABSTRACT

Over 20% of the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) germline variants in suspected Lynch syndrome patients are classified as variants of uncertain significance (VUS). Well-established functional assays are pivotal for assessing the biological impact of these variants and provide relevant evidence for clinical classification. In our collaborative European Mismatch Repair Working Group (EMMR-WG) we compared three different experimental approaches for evaluating the effect of seven variants on mRNA splicing in MMR genes: (i) RT-PCR of full-length transcripts (FLT), (ii) RT-PCR of targeted transcript sections (TTS), both from patient biological samples and (iii) minigene splicing assays. An overall good concordance was observed between splicing patterns in TTS, FLT and minigene analyses for all variants. The FLT analysis depicted a higher number of different isoforms and mitigated PCR-bias towards shorter isoforms. TTS analyses may miss aberrant isoforms and minigene assays may under/overestimate the severity of certain splicing defects. The interpretation of the experimental findings must be cautious to adequately discriminate abnormal events from physiological complex alternative splicing patterns. A consensus strategy for investigating the impact of MMR variants on splicing was defined. First, RNA should be obtained from patient's cell cultures (such as fresh lymphocyte cultures) incubated with/without a nonsense-mediated decay inhibitor. Second, FLT RT-PCR analysis is recommended to oversee all generated isoforms. Third, TTS analysis and minigene assays are useful independent approaches for verifying and clarifying FLT results. The use of several methodologies is likely to increase the strength of the experimental evidence which contributes to improve variant interpretation.


Subject(s)
Alternative Splicing , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis , DNA Mismatch Repair , DNA Mutational Analysis , DNA Repair Enzymes , Loss of Function Mutation , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/genetics , DNA Mismatch Repair/genetics , DNA Mutational Analysis/methods , DNA Mutational Analysis/standards , DNA Repair Enzymes/genetics , Humans , Protein Isoforms/genetics , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/standards , Transcription, Genetic
7.
PLoS One ; 17(2): e0263736, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35134089

ABSTRACT

Sudden emergence and rapid spread of COVID-19 created an inevitable need for expansion of the COVID-19 laboratory testing network across the world. The strategy to test-track-treat was advocated for quick detection and containment of the disease. Being the second most populous country in the world, India was challenged to make COVID-19 testing available and accessible in all parts of the country. The molecular laboratory testing network was augmented expeditiously, and number of laboratories was increased from one in January 2020 to 2951 till mid-September, 2021. This rapid expansion warranted the need to have inbuilt systems of quality control/ quality assurance. In addition to the ongoing inter-laboratory quality control (ILQC), India implemented an External Quality Assurance Program (EQAP) with assistance from World Health Organization (WHO) and Royal College of Pathologists, Australasia. Out of the 953 open system rRTPCR laboratories in both public and private sector who participated in the first round of EQAP, 891(93.4%) laboratories obtained a passing score of > = 80%. The satisfactory performance of Indian COVID-19 testing laboratories has boosted the confidence of the public and policy makers in the quality of testing. ILQC and EQAP need to continue to ensure adherence of the testing laboratories to the desired quality standards.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Testing/standards , COVID-19/diagnosis , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/standards , Laboratories/standards , Mass Screening/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/standards , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/genetics , COVID-19/virology , Humans , India/epidemiology , Quality Control , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Specimen Handling/methods
8.
BMJ ; 376: e066871, 2022 02 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35197270

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the proportion of lateral flow tests (LFTs) that produce negative results in those with a high risk of infectiousness from SARS-CoV-2, to investigate the impact of the stage and severity of disease, and to compare predictions made by influential mathematical models with findings of empirical studies. DESIGN: Linked data analysis combining empirical evidence of the accuracy of the Innova LFT, the probability of positive viral culture or transmission to secondary cases, and the distribution of viral loads of SARS-CoV-2 in individuals in different settings. SETTING: Testing of individuals with symptoms attending NHS Test-and-Trace centres across the UK, residents without symptoms attending municipal mass testing centres in Liverpool, and students without symptoms screened at the University of Birmingham. PARTICIPANTS: Evidence for the sensitivity of the Innova LFT, based on 70 individuals with SARS-CoV-2 and LFT results. Infectiousness was based on viral culture rates on 246 samples (176 people with SARS-CoV-2) and secondary cases among 2 474 066 contacts; distributions of cycle threshold (Ct) values from 231 497 index individuals attending NHS Test-and-Trace centres; 70 people with SARS-CoV-2 detected in Liverpool and 62 people with SARS-CoV-2 in Birmingham (54 imputed). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The predicted proportions who were missed by LFT and viral culture positive and missed by LFT and sources of secondary cases, in each of the three settings. Predictions were compared with those made by mathematical models. RESULTS: The analysis predicted that of those with a viral culture positive result, Innova would miss 20% attending an NHS Test-and-Trace centre, 29% without symptoms attending municipal mass testing, and 81% attending university screen testing without symptoms, along with 38%, 47%, and 90% of sources of secondary cases. In comparison, two mathematical models underestimated the numbers of missed infectious individuals (8%, 10%, and 32% in the three settings for one model, whereas the assumptions from the second model made it impossible to miss an infectious individual). Owing to the paucity of usable data, the inputs to the analyses are from limited sources. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of infectious people with SARS-CoV-2 missed by LFTs is substantial enough to be of clinical importance. The proportion missed varied between settings because of different viral load distributions and is likely to be highest in those without symptoms. Key models have substantially overestimated the sensitivity of LFTs compared with empirical data. An urgent need exists for additional robust well designed and reported empirical studies from intended use settings to inform evidence based policy.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Serological Testing/standards , COVID-19/epidemiology , Antibodies, Viral/blood , COVID-19/diagnosis , False Negative Reactions , False Positive Reactions , Humans , Pandemics , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/standards , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensitivity and Specificity , Viral Load
9.
Mol Biol Rep ; 49(2): 907-915, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35013862

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Reference genes are necessary for quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis and their stability can directly influence the accuracy of gene expression result. Miscanthus sacchariflorus, a perennial C4 grass that serves as promising biofuel plant for temperate climates, has not been explored for the identification of stable reference genes yet. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine potential reference genes (ACT, EF1a, FBOX, GAPDH, PP2A, SAND, TIP41, TUB and UBC) of M. sacchariflorus under different abiotic (salinity, drought and cadmium) stresses, as well as in two tissues (roots and leaves) were evaluated. The expression stability of these genes were analyzed by four commonly used software programs (geNorm, NormFinder, BestKeeper, ΔCt method and RefFinder). RESULTS: Our results found that FBOX and SAND are the most stable genes among all tested samples. FBOX and EF1a are suitable for gene expression normalization of cadmium-treated samples and salinity-treated leaves. FBOX and PP2A are appropriate reference genes for salt-stressed roots and PEG-treated leaves. The traditional reference gene ACT and GAPDH exhibited the most variable pattern, which would not be recommended for qRT-PCR analysis under different abiotic stresses. Furthermore, the expression levels of PIP2, NHX1 and MT2a under drought, salt and cadmium treatment were detected with above reference genes. CONCLUSIONS: This work identified the appropriate reference genes for qRT-PCR in M. sacchariflorus and FBOX was recommended to be effective internal control for gene expression normalization in M. sacchariflorus in response to different abiotic stresses.


Subject(s)
Poaceae/genetics , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/standards , Droughts , Gene Expression/genetics , Gene Expression Profiling/methods , Gene Expression Regulation, Plant/genetics , Genes, Plant/genetics , Plant Leaves/genetics , Plant Proteins/genetics , Plant Roots/genetics , Reference Standards , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Stress, Physiological/genetics
10.
APMIS ; 130(2): 95-100, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34758150

ABSTRACT

The aim was to determine the accuracy of anterior nasal swab in rapid antigen (Ag) tests in a low SARS-CoV-2 prevalence and massive screened community. Individuals, aged 18 years or older, who self-booked an appointment for real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test in March 2021 at a public test center in Copenhagen, Denmark were included. An oropharyngeal swab was collected for RT-PCR testing, followed by a swab from the anterior parts of the nose examined by Ag test (SD Biosensor). Accuracy of the Ag test was calculated with RT-PCR as reference. We included 7074 paired conclusive tests (n = 3461, female: 50.7%). The median age was 48 years (IQR: 36-57 years). The prevalence was 0.9%, that is, 66 tests were positive on RT-PCR. Thirty-two had a paired positive Ag test. The sensitivity was 48.5% and the specificity was 100%. This study conducted in a low prevalence setting in a massive screening set-up showed that the Ag test had a sensitivity of 48.5% and a specificity of 100%, that is, no false positive tests. The lower sensitivity is a challenge especially if Ag testing is not repeated frequently allowing this scalable test to be a robust supplement to RT-PCR testing in an ambitious public SARS-CoV-2 screening.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Serological Testing/methods , COVID-19/diagnosis , Nose/virology , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Adult , Antigens, Viral/analysis , Antigens, Viral/immunology , COVID-19/virology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/standards , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Sensitivity and Specificity
11.
Genes (Basel) ; 12(12)2021 12 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34946935

ABSTRACT

Kapok is the main host of Glenea cantor (Fabricius), which causes serious damage and is difficult to control. In severe cases, it often causes the kapok trees to die continuously, which seriously affects the results of urban landscaping. To provide reference for the functional research on related genes in G. cantor, we screened the stable expression of candidate reference genes at different developmental stages (i.e., eggs, larvae, pupae, and adults), in various adult tissues (i.e., head, thorax, abdomen, feet, antennae, and wings), and sexes (i.e., male pupae, female pupae, male adults, and female adults). In this study, 12 candidate reference genes (i.e., ACTINLIKE, ACTININ, TUB, RPL36, RPL32, RPS20, TBP, GAPDH, 18S rRNA, EF1A1, EF1A2, and UBQ) were evaluated using different adult tissues, developmental stages, and sexes. RefFinder, geNorm, NormFinder, and BestKeeper were used to evaluate and comprehensively analyze the stability of the expression of the candidate reference genes. The results show that RPL32 and EF1A1 were the most suitable reference genes in the different adult tissues, and RPL36 and EF1A1 were best at the different developmental stages. RPL36 and EF1A2 were the best fit for the qRT-PCR reference genes in the different sexes, while RPL36 and EF1A1 were the most appropriate qRT-PCR reference genes in all samples. Results from geNorm showed that the optimal number of reference genes was two. We also surveyed the expression of cellulase at the different developmental stages and in the different adult tissues. Results further verified the reliability of the reference genes, and confirmed the best reference genes under the different experimental conditions. This study provides a useful tool for molecular biological studies on G. cantor.


Subject(s)
Coleoptera/genetics , Genes, Insect/genetics , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/standards , Transcriptome/genetics , Animals , China , Gene Expression Profiling/methods , Larva/genetics , Pupa/genetics , Reference Standards , Reproducibility of Results , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods
12.
J Biosci ; 462021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34728592

ABSTRACT

The rapid spread and evolution of various strains of SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for COVID-19, continues to challenge the disease controlling measures globally. Alarming concern is, the number of second wave infections surpassed the first wave and the onset of severe symptoms manifesting rapidly. In this scenario, testing of maximum population in less time and minimum cost with existing diagnostic amenities is the only possible way to control the spread of the virus. The previously described RNA extraction-free methods using dry swab have been shown to be advantageous in these critical times by different studies. In this work, we show the temporal stability and performance of the dry swab viral detection method at two different temperatures. Contrived dry swabs holding serially diluted SARS-CoV-2 strains A2a and A3i at 25°C (room temperature; RT) and 4°C were subjected to direct RT-PCR and compared with standard VTM-RNA based method. The results clearly indicate that dry swab method of RNA detection is as efficient as VTM-RNA-based method in both strains, when checked for up to 72 h. The lesser CT values of dry swab samples in comparison to that of the VTM-RNA samples suggest better sensitivity of the method within 48 h of time. The results collectively suggest that dry swab samples are stable at RT for 24 h and the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA by RT-PCR do not show variance from VTM-RNA. This extraction free, direct RT-PCR method holds phenomenal standing in the present life-threatening circumstances due to SARS-CoV-2.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Testing/methods , COVID-19/diagnosis , RNA, Viral/genetics , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Specimen Handling/methods , COVID-19/virology , COVID-19 Testing/standards , Humans , Nasopharynx/virology , Preservation, Biological/methods , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/standards , SARS-CoV-2/classification , Sensitivity and Specificity , Temperature
13.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 40(11): e413-e417, 2021 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34596626

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The viral dynamics and the role of children in the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are not completely understood. Our aim was to evaluate reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) cycle threshold (Ct) values among children with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 compared with that of adult subjects. METHODS: Patients (from 2 months to ≤18 years of age and adults) with signs and symptoms of acute SARS-CoV-2 infection for less than 7 days were prospectively enrolled in the study from May to November 2020. All participants performed RT-PCR assay for SARS-CoV-2 detection; Ct values of ORF1ab, N and S gene targets and the average of all the 3 probes were used as surrogates of viral load. RESULTS: There were 21 infants (2 months to <2 years), 40 children (≥2 to <12 years), 22 adolescents (≥12 to <18 years) and 293 adults of 376 participants with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections. RT-PCR Ct values from all participants less than 18 years of age, as well as from all childhood subgroups, were not significantly different from adults, comparing ORF1ab, N, S and all the gene targets together (P = 0.453). CONCLUSIONS: Ct values for children were comparable with that of adults. Although viral load is not the only determinant of SARS-CoV-2 transmission, children may play a role in the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 in the community.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Testing , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/virology , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Brazil , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Infant , RNA, Viral , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/standards , Viral Load
14.
Mol Biol Rep ; 48(11): 7477-7485, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34637095

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Maruca vitrata is one of the potential insect pests that cause devastating losses to legume cultivation worldwide. Gene functional studies facilitate dissecting the molecular mechanisms underlying the infection process and enable devising appropriate molecular strategies to control this insect pest. Expression profiling using quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) provides insights into the functional characterization of target genes; however, ideal reference genes should be deployed in such studies to nullify the background variation and improve the accuracy of target gene expression. An ideal reference gene should have a stable expression across developmental stages, biological conditions, tissues, or experimental conditions. METHODS AND RESULTS: Given this, the stability of eight candidate reference genes was evaluated in M. vitrata at different developmental stages, diets, and sexes by qRT-PCR method, and the data was analyzed using four independent algorithms, namely GeNorm, NormFinder, BestKeeper, and ΔCt, and one comprehensive algorithm, RefFinder. CONCLUSION: The analysis showed that RP49 and RPL13 were the best suitable reference genes for studying target gene expression at different developmental stages. Further, the study identified RP49 and RPL24, and GAPDH and RPL24 as the ideal reference genes in M. vitrata fed with different diets and sexes, respectively. The reference genes reported in the present study will ensure the accuracy of target gene expression, and thus, will serve as an important resource for gene functional studies in M. vitrata.


Subject(s)
Gene Expression Profiling/standards , Genes, Insect , Moths , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/standards , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/standards , Animals , Moths/genetics , Moths/metabolism , Reference Standards
15.
Int J Mol Sci ; 22(19)2021 Sep 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34638877

ABSTRACT

Due to the lack of effective and stable reference genes, studies on functional genes in Rubus, a genus of economically important small berry crops, have been greatly limited. To select the best internal reference genes of different types, we selected four representative cultivars of blackberry and raspberry (red raspberry, yellow raspberry, and black raspberry) as the research material and used RT-qPCR technology combined with three internal stability analysis software programs (geNorm, NormFinder, and BestKeeper) to analyze 12 candidate reference genes for the stability of their expression. The number of most suitable internal reference genes for different cultivars, tissues, and fruit developmental stages of Rubus was calculated by geNorm software to be two. Based on the results obtained with the three software programs, the most stable genes in the different cultivars were RuEEF1A and Ru18S. Finally, to validate the reliability of selected reference genes, the expression pattern of the RuCYP73A gene was analyzed, and the results highlighted the importance of appropriate reference gene selection. RuEEF1A and Ru18S were screened as reference genes for their relatively stable expression, providing a reference for the further study of key functional genes in blackberry and raspberry and an effective tool for the analysis of differential gene expression.


Subject(s)
Gene Expression Profiling/standards , Gene Expression Regulation, Plant , Genes, Plant , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/standards , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/standards , Rubus , Reference Standards , Rubus/genetics , Rubus/metabolism
16.
Ir Med J ; 114(7): 414, 2021 08 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34520649

ABSTRACT

Aims Since its emergence, significant interest surrounds the use of SARS-CoV-2 serological tests as an alternative or as an adjunct to molecular testing. However, given the speed of this pandemic, paralleled with the pressure to develop and provide serological tests in an expediated manner, not every assay has undergone the rigorous evaluation that is usually associated with medical diagnostic assays. We aimed to examine the performance of several commercially available SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody assays among participants with confirmed COVID-19 disease and negative controls. Methods Serum taken between day 17 and day 40 post onset of symptoms from 41 healthcare workers with RT-PCR confirmed COVID-19 disease, and pre-pandemic serum from 20 negative controls, were tested for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 IgG using 7 different assays including point-of-care (POC) and laboratory-based assays. Results Assay performance varied. The lab-based Abbott diagnostics SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay proved to be the assay with the best positive and negative predictive value, and overall accuracy. The POC Nal von Minden GmbH and Biozek assays also performed well. Conclusion Our research demonstrates the variations in performance of several commercially available SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays. These findings identify the limitations of some serological tests for SARS-CoV-2. This information will help inform test selection and may have particular relevance to providers operating beyond accredited laboratories.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Testing/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19/diagnosis , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Point-of-Care Systems/statistics & numerical data , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/standards
17.
Reprod Toxicol ; 105: 211-220, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34537367

ABSTRACT

The choice of reference gene is crucial for quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) assay. To screen and determine the suitable reference genes in fetal rat pancreas, we selected eight candidate reference genes (Gapdh, Actb, Rn18 s, B2m, Rpl13a, Tbp, Ywhaz and Ubc), and evaluated the constancy of gene expression from fetal rat pancreases in non-pathological situation and prenatal dexamethasone exposure (PDE) model, using four algorithms: GeNorm, NormFinder, Bestkeeper and Comparative ΔCt method. In addition, the alteration of mRNA levels of pancreatic insulin was compared between control and PDE groups to validate the reliability of selected reference genes for data normalization of RT-qPCR. The comprehensive ranking of reference genes under physiological condition was as follow: Gapdh > Actb > Ywhaz > Ubc > Rn18s > Rpl13a > B2m > Tbp (female); Actb > Ywhaz > Gapdh > Ubc > B2m > Rpl13a > Rn18 s | Tbp (male). The top ranking reference genes were also stably expressed in PDE fetal pancreas. The best reference gene combinations are: Ywhaz+Actb for female and Ywhaz+Gapdh for male fetal rat pancreas, respectively. Compared with low ranking or single reference gene, the change trend of insulin mRNA normalized by the best reference gene combination between control and PDE groups was more significant and consistent with that of serum insulin level. In conclusion, our results provided the optimal combination of stable reference genes for RT-qPCR assay in pancreatic developmental toxicity study.


Subject(s)
Fetus , Gene Expression , Pancreas , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/standards , Animals , Female , Insulin/blood , Male , Rats, Wistar , Reference Standards , Reproducibility of Results
18.
Viruses ; 13(8)2021 07 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34452308

ABSTRACT

Viruses are considered of major importance in strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duchesne) production given their negative impact on plant vigor and growth. Strawberry accessions from the National Clonal Germplasm Repository were screened for viruses using high throughput sequencing (HTS). Analyses of sequence information from 45 plants identified multiple variants of 14 known viruses, comprising strawberry mottle virus (SMoV), beet pseudo yellows virus (BPYV), strawberry pallidosis-associated virus (SPaV), tomato ringspot virus (ToRSV), strawberry mild yellow edge virus (SMYEV), strawberry vein banding virus (SVBV), strawberry crinkle virus (SCV), strawberry polerovirus 1 (SPV-1), apple mosaic virus (ApMV), strawberry chlorotic fleck virus (SCFaV), strawberry crinivirus 4 (SCrV-4), strawberry crinivirus 3 (SCrV-3), Fragaria chiloensis latent virus (FClLV) and Fragaria chiloensis cryptic virus (FCCV). Genetic diversity of sequenced virus isolates was investigated via sequence homology analysis, and partial-genome sequences were deposited into GenBank. To confirm the HTS results and expand the detection of strawberry viruses, new reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) assays were designed for the above-listed viruses. Further in silico and in vitro validation of the new diagnostic assays indicated high efficiency and reliability. Thus, the occurrence of different viruses, including divergent variants, among the strawberries was verified. This is the first viral metagenomic survey in strawberry, additionally, this study describes the design and validation of multiple RT-qPCR assays for strawberry viruses, which represent important detection tools for clean plant programs.


Subject(s)
Fragaria/virology , Genetic Variation , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Plant Diseases/virology , RNA Viruses/genetics , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/standards , Chromosome Mapping , Genome, Viral , Metagenomics , Phylogeny , RNA Viruses/classification , Reproducibility of Results
19.
Viruses ; 13(7)2021 07 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34372546

ABSTRACT

The viral loads of acute bee paralysis virus (ABPV), black queen cell virus (BQCV), chronic bee paralysis virus (CBPV), deformed wing virus (DWV), Lake Sinai virus 3 (LSV3), and sacbrood bee virus (SBV) were determined in samples with the use of quantitative TaqMan real-time reverse transcription and polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). A total of 108 samples of healthy adult honeybees from four differently located apiaries and samples of honeybees showing different clinical signs of viral infections from 89 apiaries were collected throughout Slovenia. The aim of this study was to discover correlations between viral loads and clinical signs in adult honeybees and confirm previously set threshold viral load levels between healthy and clinically affected honeybees. Within this study, two new RT-qPCR assays for quantification of LSV3 and SBV were developed. Statistically significant differences in viral loads of positive samples were identified between healthy and clinically affected honeybees for ABPV, CBPV, DWV, and SBV, while for BQCV and LSV3, no statistical differences were observed between both groups. Despite high detected LSV3 prevalence and viral loads around 6.00 log10 viral copies/bee, this lineage probably has a limited impact on the health status of honeybee colonies. The determined viral loads between 3.94 log10 and 13.17 log10 in positive samples for six viruses, collected over 10 consecutive months, including winter, present additional information of high viral load variations in healthy honeybee colonies.


Subject(s)
Bees/virology , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Viral Load/statistics & numerical data , Viruses/classification , Viruses/genetics , Animals , Dicistroviridae/genetics , Prevalence , RNA Viruses/genetics , RNA, Viral , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/standards , Seasons , Viral Load/methods , Viral Load/standards , Viruses/isolation & purification , Viruses/pathogenicity
20.
J Infect Dev Ctries ; 15(7): 913-917, 2021 07 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34343115

ABSTRACT

Early diagnosis is among the crucial measures to control the spread of SARS-CoV-2 infection. To date, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the gold standard for COVID-19 testing, but various factors can affect its performance leading to false negative results. Hereby we present a patient with a high clinical suspicion for COVID-19 and had multiple negative RT-PCR results over 5 days. A 22-year-old woman presented with fever, dry cough, nausea, myalgia, headache, and mild dyspnea. Eleven days before, she was in close contact with her father who had tested positive for COVID-19. RT-PCR on nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs were performed on day 8, 9, and 12 of illness which all came back negative even after she started having a worsening dyspnea and showing an increased lung opacity from radiographic findings on day 11 of illness. Interestingly, her rapid antibody test (VivaDiag™ COVID-19 IgM/IgG rapid test by VivaChek Biotech (HangZhou,China) was positive for anti-SARS-CoV-2 Ig M and Ig G. Due to the worsening condition, she was referred to a tertiary hospital where her RT PCR result was positive on day 13 of illness. After 28 days from her first symptom, she was discharged from the hospital with improved symptoms and chest X-ray. As conclusions, in patients with high suspicion of COVID-19, repeat swab tests are mandatory if previous tests were negative. The diagnosis and treatment plan of COVID-19 should not solely be based on RT-PCR, but also consider the patient's history, symptoms, laboratory result, and radiographic findings.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing/standards , COVID-19/diagnosis , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/standards , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Antibodies, Viral/blood , COVID-19/virology , False Negative Reactions , Female , Humans , Immunoglobulin M/blood , Nasopharynx/virology , Sensitivity and Specificity , Specimen Handling , Time Factors , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL