Functional outcomes in unstable complete subaxial cervical spinal injuries with respiratory paralysis and/or hemodynamic instability.

INTRODUCTION: Subaxial cervical spine injuries (SCSI) can lead to disastrous consequences such as quadriplegia, with/without respiratory paralysis (RP) and hemodynamic instability (HDI). Till date, there is no literature available for reporting outcomes of SCSI patients specifically pertaining to those presenting with RP/HDI and ours is the first study to document the same. METHODS: Retrospective 6-year study from a tertiary trauma centre database including patients >/= 18 years of operated SCSI. Only patients with ASIA A grade with admission RP/HDI and unstable injuries (fractures, subluxations) were included. Patients with ASIA grade B and above, patients with non-osseous injuries (such as disc herniation, central cord syndrome etc.) were excluded. RESULTS: 24 cases were analysed. C5 and C6 levels were the commonest. Vertebral listhesis/subluxation was the predominant radiological finding. The mean age was 47.4 years (22-79 years) and all, except one were males. Fall from height and road traffic accident (RTA) were the most common mechanisms of injury. The most common surgery was anterior discectomy and fusion followed by corpectomy. The overall mortality rate was 22/24 (92)%. Cord edema and hemorrhage had significant association with survival. None of the grade A survivors with HDI/RP showed improvement. The mean FU duration was 18.5 months (range, 16.5-20.5 months). CONCLUSIONS: Subaxial ASIA A cervical spine injuries with pre-operative RP/HDI is an indicator for non-improvement. This is the first study documenting outcome in such patients. The mortality rate in these patients is very high and is an extremely poor prognostic factor for recovery. Hence, surgery in such patients need to be decided judiciously, especially in developing countries that has a significant financial impact on the family members.

[Cervical Spine Injuries]. / Verletzungen der oberen Halswirbelsäule.

Around a third of all cervical spine injuries occur in the upper cervical spine in the area between the occiput and the second cervical vertebra. The latter being the most common location of the injury with around 70%. But also atlas fractures, occipital condyle fractures, traumatic spondylolisthesis of C2, atypical fractures in the corpus area as well as atlantooccipital and atlantoaxial ligamentous lesions should be mentioned in connection with injuries in this area. In many cases, conservative therapy regimen is possible. In unstable or displaced injuries, however, surgical intervention is required, with various surgical procedures being used. The frequency, diagnostics, classification, and standard therapy of the individual entities are presented in detail in this continuing medical education article.

[Psychological interventions in the field of neurotraumatology during the acute care].

Neurotrauma means head or spine injury caused by an external force. Neurotraumatology care requires coordinated teamwork on the part of specialists, including psychological care as part of the multidisciplinary treatment team. Psychological interventions in the field of neurotraumatology aim to address the psychological consequences and challenges associated with head or spine injury. These interventions play a vital role in crisis intervention, promoting recovery, enhancing quality of life, and supporting individuals and their families in coping with the psychological impact of neurotrauma. Serious physical injuries always cause severe psychological consequences, both in short and long term. A critical accident is a sudden, unexpected, often directly life-threatening event that exceeds the individual's ability to respond and can create a potential crisis response, including suicidal risk, as well as the development of psychological disorders, in most cases acute stress disorder, adjustment disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder. Psychological interventions in neurotraumatology are often provided by a multidisciplinary team that may include psychologists, psychiatrists, social workers, and other healthcare professionals. These interventions are tailored to the unique needs and circumstances of each individual, with the goal of reducing psychological symptomps, promoting psychological well-being, adjustment, and overall recovery following neurotrauma. It is essential that not only patients who have experienced severe physical trauma, but also their family members have access to expert psychological support. This study summarizes psychological interventions during the treatment of neurotaruma patients at the intensive care unit.

Comparison of C-MAC ® conventional blade, D-Blade ™ , and Macintosh laryngoscopes for endotracheal intubation in patients with simulated immobilization using manual in-line stabilization: A randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: A difficult airway is anticipated with cervical spine injuries (CSIs) as immobilization techniques such as manual in-line stabilization (MILS) are used, which distort the oro-pharyngeal-laryngeal axis. Video laryngoscopes (VLs) make difficult airway management easy, as they do not require axis alignment. The present study aimed to compare the total time taken by Macintosh laryngoscope (ML), conventional blade, and D-blade ™ of C-MAC ® VL in simulated CSI scenarios using MILS. METHODS: Ninety patients were randomly allocated into three groups: Group M (ML), Group C (conventional blade of C-MAC ® ), and Group D (D-blade ™ of C-MAC ® ) with MILS applied before intubation. Primary outcome was the total time taken for successful intubation, while secondary outcomes were to assess Cormack-Lehane (CL) grade, number of attempts, hemodynamic response, and associated complications. RESULTS: Total time for intubation in Group C was 23.40 ± 7.06 sec compared to 35.27 ± 6.53 and 47.27 ± 2.53 sec in groups D and M, respectively ( P < 0.001). CL-grade I was observed in 15/30 (50%) in Group M, 25/30 (83.3%) in Group C, and 29/30 (96.7%) in Group D. Group M reported 7/30 (23.3%) failed intubations, while none were observed in other groups. Hemodynamic parameters were significantly higher at 3 and 5 min in Group M. Postoperative sore throat was recorded in 12/30 (40%) in Group M compared to 3/30 (10%) in groups C and D each ( P value 0.037). CONCLUSION: C-MAC ® VL requires less time for intubation, provides better glottic view, and has higher success, with better attenuation of hemodynamic response and fewer complications compared to ML.

Are triage tools effective for detecting cervical spine injury in paediatric trauma patients? - A Cochrane Review summary with commentary.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric cervical spine injuries (CSIs) from blunt trauma carry a high risk of neurological damage. Accurate diagnosis is vital for preventing harm and aiding recovery, yet the diagnostic accuracy of clinical decision rules (CDRs) remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of triage tools for detecting CSI in pediatric trauma patients. METHODS: A summary of the Cochrane Review by Tavender et al. (2024), with comments from a rehabilitation perspective. RESULTS: Five studies with 21,379 participants assessed seven CDRs. Direct comparisons showed high sensitivity but low specificity across different CDRs. Indirect comparison studies also demonstrated varying sensitivities and specificities. CONCLUSIONS: Insufficient evidence exists to determine the best tools for deciding if imaging is necessary for diagnosing potential CSI in children. Better quality studies are needed to assess the accuracy of CDRs for cervical spine clearance in this population.

Clinical Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Surgery on Spinal Trauma.

AIM: Minimally invasive spinal trauma surgery includes percutaneous pedicle screw fixation and miniature open anterolateral retractor-based approaches, which can improve surgical outcomes by reducing blood loss, operative time, and postoperative pain. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of minimally invasive surgery on pain scores, functional recovery, and postoperative complications in patients with spinal trauma. METHODS: This retrospective study included 100 spinal trauma patients treated in Suzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine between May 2019 and May 2022. Patients who underwent traditional open surgery were included in the traditional group, and those who received percutaneous pedicle screw internal fixation combined with posterior minimally invasive small incision decompression were included in the research group, each comprising 50 patients. The effectiveness of these two surgical approaches was determined by assessing their outcome measures, including surgery-related indices, postoperative pain, spinal morphology, functional recovery, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: Minimally invasive surgery was associated with significantly shorter surgical wounds, length of hospital stay, operative time, and postoperative time-lapse before off-bed activity, and less intraoperative hemorrhage volume and postoperative drainage volume compared to open surgery (p < 0.001). Compared to open surgery, patients with minimally invasive surgery showed significantly lower visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at 3 days, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery and lower Oswestry dysfunction index (ODI) at 7 days and 3 months after surgery (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the difference in the spine morphology between the two arms did not achieve statistical significance (p > 0.05). Additionally, minimally invasive surgery resulted in a significantly lower incidence of postoperative complications than open surgery (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive surgery causes less surgical damage for patients with spinal trauma, improves surgery-related indexes, alleviates postoperative pain, and provides better morphological and functional recovery of the spine.

[Scoring system for unstable spinal gunshot wounds: the study protocol]. / Ball'naya takticheskaya klassifikatsiya nestabil'nykh ognestrel'nykh ranenii pozvonochnika: protokol issledovaniya.

Morphology of injuries following gunshot wounds requires specific treatment approaches. Currently, there are no similar classifications for assessing fracture stability with subsequent tactical recommendations. Taking into account diagnostic limitations (contraindications for MRI due to implantable metal fragments, limitations of functional radiography of the spine in seriously injured patients), we make decisions considering CT data. In this study, we will determine severity of vertebral damage and effect of these damages on mechanical stability of spinal motion segments. In the future, CT-based assessment of inter-expert agreement will be performed. Finally, we will propose the scoring system for classification of spinal gunshot wounds. OBJECTIVE: To present a research protocol for development of new scoring system for unstable spinal gunshot wounds based on inter-expert agreement assessment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: To create a new tactical classification, we will distinguish and analyze clinical and CT data of patients with thoracolumbar spinal gunshot wounds. The Delphi method will be used to collaborate between several surgeons. A three-stage study will result a questionnaire (for 30 clinical cases). We will develop tactical scoring system and analyze statistical data (kappa). DISCUSSION: Various classifications have been developed for closed spinal injuries. These systems describe the nature of injury and allow one to develop tactical decisions for further actions. Another mechanism of injuries following gunshot wounds does not allow the classification of closed injuries to be adequately applied in some cases. Indeed, spinal structures follow either direct passage of a wounding projectile through the spine or transferring the energy of this projectile in contrast to classical compression, distraction and rotational-translation mechanisms typical for closed trauma.

Prehospital guidelines on in-water traumatic spinal injuries for lifeguards and prehospital emergency medical services: an international Delphi consensus study.

BACKGROUND: Trauma guidelines on spinal motion restriction (SMR) have changed drastically in recent years. An international group of experts explored whether consensus could be reached and if guidelines on SMR performed by trained lifeguards and prehospital EMS following in-water traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) should also be changed. METHODS: An international three-round Delphi process was conducted from October 2022 to November 2023. In Delphi round one, brainstorming resulted in an exhaustive list of recommendations for handling patients with suspected in-water TSCI. The list was also used to construct a preliminary flowchart for in-water SMR. In Delphi round two, three levels of agreement for each recommendation and the flowchart were established. Recommendations with strong consensus (≥ 85% agreement) underwent minor revisions and entered round three; recommendations with moderate consensus (75-85% agreement) underwent major revisions in two consecutive phases; and recommendations with weak consensus (< 75% agreement) were excluded. In Delphi round 3, the level of consensus for each of the final recommendations and each of the routes in the flowchart was tested using the same procedure as in Delphi round 2. RESULTS: Twenty-four experts participated in Delphi round one. The response rates for Delphi rounds two and three were 92% and 88%, respectively. The study resulted in 25 recommendations and one flowchart with four flowchart paths; 24 recommendations received strong consensus (≥ 85%), and one recommendation received moderate consensus (81%). Each of the four paths in the flowchart received strong consensus (90-95%). The integral flowchart received strong consensus (93%). CONCLUSIONS: This study produced expert consensus on 25 recommendations and a flowchart on handling patients with suspected in-water TSCI by trained lifeguards and prehospital EMS. These results provide clear and simple guidelines on SMR, which can standardise training and guidelines on SMR performed by trained lifeguards or prehospital EMS.

[Vertebral artery dissection during traumatic injury of the cervical spine, two case reports]. / Nyaki gerinc traumás sérülése során jelentkezo arteria vertebralis dissectio, két esetbemutatás.

If severe cervical spinal cord injury or severe cervical vertebral fracture, subluxation or luxation is confirmed, 20-40% of the cases have vertebral artery dissection or occlusion. These can be asymptomatic, but can cause additional neurological damage in addition to cervical myelon and cervical nerve root symptoms. Vertebral artery dissection can be caused by direct injuries, stab wounds or gunshot wounds. Indirect vertebral artery dissection can occur at the same time as subluxation, luxation, or complex fractures of the cervical vertebra. CTA is the examination procedure of choice. In many cases, digital subtaction angiography examination and, if necessary, neurointerventional treatment must precede open neurosurgery. In our report, in the first patient, complete luxation of the C.VI vertebra caused unilateral vertebral artery 2-segment dissection-occlusion, while in our second patient, a stab injury caused direct vertebral artery compression and dissection. The occlusion of the vertebral artery did not cause neurological symptoms in any of the cases. In both of our cases, parent vessel occlusion was performed at the level of the vertebral artery injury before the neurosurgical operation.

Bilateral Back Extensor Exosuit for multidimensional assistance and prevention of spinal injuries.

Lumbar spine injuries resulting from heavy or repetitive lifting remain a prevalent concern in workplaces. Back-support devices have been developed to mitigate these injuries by aiding workers during lifting tasks. However, existing devices often fall short in providing multidimensional force assistance for asymmetric lifting, an essential feature for practical workplace use. In addition, validation of device safety across the entire human spine has been lacking. This paper introduces the Bilateral Back Extensor Exosuit (BBEX), a robotic back-support device designed to address both functionality and safety concerns. The design of the BBEX draws inspiration from the anatomical characteristics of the human spine and back extensor muscles. Using a multi-degree-of-freedom architecture and serially connected linear actuators, the device's components are strategically arranged to closely mimic the biomechanics of the human spine and back extensor muscles. To establish the efficacy and safety of the BBEX, a series of experiments with human participants was conducted. Eleven healthy male participants engaged in symmetric and asymmetric lifting tasks while wearing the BBEX. The results confirm the ability of the BBEX to provide effective multidimensional force assistance. Moreover, comprehensive safety validation was achieved through analyses of muscle fatigue in the upper and the lower erector spinae muscles, as well as mechanical loading on spinal joints during both lifting scenarios. By seamlessly integrating functionality inspired by human biomechanics with a focus on safety, this study offers a promising solution to address the persistent challenge of preventing lumbar spine injuries in demanding work environments.

The hidden value of MRI: modifying treatment decisions in C-spine injuries.

BACKGROUND DATA: Computed Tomography (CT) is the gold standard for cervical spine (c-spine) evaluation. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) emerges due to its increasing availability and the lack of radiation exposure. However, MRI is costly and time-consuming, questioning its role in the emergency department (ED). This study investigates the added the value of an additional MRI for patients presenting with a c-spine injury in the ED. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective monocenter cohort study that included all patients with neck trauma presenting in the ED, who received imaging based on the NEXUS criteria. Spine surgeons performed a full-case review to classify each case into "c-spine injured" and "c-spine uninjured". Injuries were classified according to the AO Spine classification. We assessed patients with a c-spine injury detected by CT, who received a subsequent MRI. In this subset, injuries were classified separately in both imaging modalities. We monitored the treatment changes after the additional MRI to evaluate characteristics of this cohort and the impact of the AO Spine Neurology/Modifier modifiers. RESULTS: We identified 4496 subjects, 2321 were eligible for inclusion and 186 were diagnosed with c-spine injuries in the retrospective case review. Fifty-six patients with a c-spine injury initially identified through CT received an additional MRI. The additional MRI significantly extended (geometric mean ratio 1.32, p < 0.001) the duration of the patients' stay in the ED. Of this cohort, 25% had a change in treatment strategy and among the patients with neurological symptoms (AON ≥ 1), 45.8% experienced a change in treatment. Patients that were N-positive, had a 12.4 (95% CI 2.7-90.7, p < 0.01) times higher odds of a treatment change after an additional MRI than neurologically intact patients. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Our study suggests that patients with a c-spine injury and neurological symptoms benefit from an additional MRI. In neurologically intact patients, an additional MRI retains value only when carefully evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

Preoperative Opioid Use Increases Postoperative Opioid Demand, but Not Length of Stay After Spine Trauma Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative opioid use has been well-studied in elective spinal surgery and correlated with numerous postoperative complications including increases in immediate postoperative opioid demand (POD), continued opioid use postoperatively, prolonged length of stay (LOS), readmissions, and disability. There is a paucity of data available on the use of preoperative opioids in surgery for spine trauma, possibly because there are minimal options for opioid reduction prior to emergent spinal surgery. Nevertheless, patients with traumatic spinal injuries are at a high risk for adverse postoperative outcomes. This study investigated the effects of preoperative opioid use on POD and LOS in spine trauma patients. METHODS: 130 patients were grouped into two groups for primary comparison: Group 1 (preoperative opioid use, N = 16) and Group 2 (no opioid use, N = 114). Two subgroups of Group 2 were used for secondary analysis against Group 1: Group 3 (no substance abuse, N = 95) and Group 4 (other substance abuse, N = 19). Multivariable analysis was used to determine if there were significant differences in POD and LOS. RESULTS: Primary analysis demonstrated that preoperative opioid users required an estimated 97.5 mg/day more opioid medications compared to non-opioid users (P < 0.001). Neither primary nor secondary analysis showed a difference in LOS in any of the comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative opioid users had increased POD compared to non-opioid users and patients abusing other substances, but there was no difference in LOS. We theorize the lack of difference in LOS may be due to the enhanced perioperative recovery protocol used, which has been demonstrated to reduce LOS.

Is mechanism of injury associated with outcome in spinal trauma? An observational cohort study from Tanzania.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic spinal injury (TSI) is a disease of significant global health burden, particularly in low and middle-income countries where road traffic-related trauma is increasing. This study compared the demographics, injury patterns, and outcomes of TSI caused by road traffic accidents (RTAs) to non-traffic related TSI. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted using a neurotrauma registry from the Muhimbili Orthopaedic Institute (MOI) in Tanzania, a national referral center for spinal injuries. Patient sociodemographic characteristics, injury level, and severity were compared across mechanisms of injury. Neurological improvement, neurological deterioration, and mortality were compared between those sustaining TSI through an RTA versus non-RTA, using univariable and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: A total of 626 patients were included, of which 302 (48%) were RTA-related. The median age was 34 years, and 532 (85%) were male. RTAs had a lower male preponderance compared to non-RTA causes (238/302, 79% vs. 294/324, 91%, p<0.001) and a higher proportion of cervical injuries (144/302, 48% vs. 122/324, 38%, p<0.001). No significant differences between RTA and non-RTA mechanisms were found in injury severity, time to admission, length of hospital stay, surgical intervention, neurological outcomes, or in-hospital mortality. Improved neurological outcomes were associated with incomplete injuries (AIS B-D), while higher mortality rates were linked to cervical injuries and complete (AIS A) injuries. CONCLUSION: Our study in urban Tanzania finds no significant differences in outcomes between spinal injuries from road traffic accidents (RTAs) and non-RTA causes, suggesting the need for equitable resource allocation in spine trauma programs. Highlighting the critical link between cervical injuries and increased mortality, our findings call for targeted interventions across all causes of traumatic spinal injuries (TSI). We advocate for a comprehensive trauma care system that merges efficient pre-hospital care, specialized treatment, and prevention measures, aiming to enhance outcomes and ensure equity in trauma care in low- and middle-income countries.

Safety of anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) for the treatment of subaxial cervical spine injuries, a single center comparative matched analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) and Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion (ACCF) are both common surgical procedures in the management of pathologies of the subaxial cervical spine. While recent reviews have demonstrated ACCF to provide better decompression results compared to ACDF, the procedure has been associated with increased surgical risks. Nonetheless, the use of ACCF in a traumatic context has been poorly described. The aim of this study was to assess the safety of ACCF as compared to the more commonly performed ACDF. METHODS: All patients undergoing ACCF or ACDF for subaxial cervical spine injuries spanning over 2 disc-spaces and 3 vertebral-levels, between 2006 and 2018, at the study center, were eligible for inclusion. Patients were matched based on age and preoperative ASIA score. RESULTS: After matching, 60 patients were included in the matched analysis, where 30 underwent ACDF and ACCF, respectively. Vertebral body injury was significantly more common in the ACCF group (p = 0.002), while traumatic disc rupture was more frequent in the ACDF group (p = 0.032). There were no statistically significant differences in the rates of surgical complications, including implant failure, wound infection, dysphagia, CSF leakage between the groups (p ≥ 0.05). The rates of revision surgeries (p > 0.999), mortality (p = 0.222), and long-term ASIA scores (p = 0.081) were also similar. CONCLUSION: Results of both unmatched and matched analyses indicate that ACCF has comparable outcomes and no additional risks compared to ACDF. It is thus a safe approach and should be considered for patients with extensive anterior column injury.

PECARN prediction rule for cervical spine imaging of children presenting to the emergency department with blunt trauma: a multicentre prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Cervical spine injuries in children are uncommon but potentially devastating; however, indiscriminate neck imaging after trauma unnecessarily exposes children to ionising radiation. The aim of this study was to derive and validate a paediatric clinical prediction rule that can be incorporated into an algorithm to guide radiographic screening for cervical spine injury among children in the emergency department. METHODS: In this prospective observational cohort study, we screened children aged 0-17 years presenting with known or suspected blunt trauma at 18 specialised children's emergency departments in hospitals in the USA affiliated with the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN). Injured children were eligible for enrolment into derivation or validation cohorts by fulfilling one of the following criteria: transported from the scene of injury to the emergency department by emergency medical services; evaluated by a trauma team; and undergone neck imaging for concern for cervical spine injury either at or before arriving at the PECARN-affiliated emergency department. Children presenting with solely penetrating trauma were excluded. Before viewing an enrolled child's neck imaging results, the attending emergency department clinician completed a clinical examination and prospectively documented cervical spine injury risk factors in an electronic questionnaire. Cervical spine injuries were determined by imaging reports and telephone follow-up with guardians within 21-28 days of the emergency room encounter, and cervical spine injury was confirmed by a paediatric neurosurgeon. Factors associated with a high risk of cervical spine injury (>10%) were identified by bivariable Poisson regression with robust error estimates, and factors associated with non-negligible risk were identified by classification and regression tree (CART) analysis. Variables were combined in the cervical spine injury prediction rule. The primary outcome of interest was cervical spine injury within 28 days of initial trauma warranting inpatient observation or surgical intervention. Rule performance measures were calculated for both derivation and validation cohorts. A clinical care algorithm for determining which risk factors warrant radiographic screening for cervical spine injury after blunt trauma was applied to the study population to estimate the potential effect on reducing CT and x-ray use in the paediatric emergency department. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05049330. FINDINGS: Nine emergency departments participated in the derivation cohort, and nine participated in the validation cohort. In total, 22 430 children presenting with known or suspected blunt trauma were enrolled (11 857 children in the derivation cohort; 10 573 in the validation cohort). 433 (1·9%) of the total population had confirmed cervical spine injuries. The following factors were associated with a high risk of cervical spine injury: altered mental status (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score of 3-8 or unresponsive on the Alert, Verbal, Pain, Unresponsive scale [AVPU] of consciousness); abnormal airway, breathing, or circulation findings; and focal neurological deficits including paresthesia, numbness, or weakness. Of 928 in the derivation cohort presenting with at least one of these risk factors, 118 (12·7%) had cervical spine injury (risk ratio 8·9 [95% CI 7·1-11·2]). The following factors were associated with non-negligible risk of cervical spine injury by CART analysis: neck pain; altered mental status (GCS score of 9-14; verbal or pain on the AVPU; or other signs of altered mental status); substantial head injury; substantial torso injury; and midline neck tenderness. The high-risk and CART-derived factors combined and applied to the validation cohort performed with 94·3% (95% CI 90·7-97·9) sensitivity, 60·4% (59·4-61·3) specificity, and 99·9% (99·8-100·0) negative predictive value. Had the algorithm been applied to all participants to guide the use of imaging, we estimated the number of children having CT might have decreased from 3856 (17·2%) to 1549 (6·9%) of 22 430 children without increasing the number of children getting plain x-rays. INTERPRETATION: Incorporated into a clinical algorithm, the cervical spine injury prediction rule showed strong potential for aiding clinicians in determining which children arriving in the emergency department after blunt trauma should undergo radiographic neck imaging for potential cervical spine injury. Implementation of the clinical algorithm could decrease use of unnecessary radiographic testing in the emergency department and eliminate high-risk radiation exposure. Future work should validate the prediction rule and care algorithm in more general settings such as community emergency departments. FUNDING: The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the Health Resources and Services Administration of the US Department of Health and Human Services in the Maternal and Child Health Bureau under the Emergency Medical Services for Children programme.

Evaluation of traumatic spinal injuries: a pediatric perspective.

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study is to provide information about pediatric patients with spinal trauma. METHODS: A single-center retrospective chart review was carried out. Children who arrived at the pediatric emergency department due to trauma and those with spinal pathology confirmed by radiological assessment were included. Demographics, mechanisms of trauma, clinical findings, radiological investigations, applied treatments, hospital stay and prognosis were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 105 patients [59 (56.2%) boys; mean age: 12.9 ± 3.8 years (mean ± SD)] were included. The most common age group was that of 14-18 years (58.1%). The three most common trauma mechanisms were road traffic collisions (RTCs) (60.0%), falls (32.4%), and diving into water (2.9%). A fracture of the spine was detected in 97.1% patients, vertebral dislocation in 10.7%, and spinal cord injury in 16.3%. Of the patients, 36.9% were admitted to the ward and 18.4% to the pediatric intensive care unit; 17.1% were discharged with severe complications and 2.9% cases resulted in death. While 34.3% of the patients had a clinically isolated spine injury, the remaining cases entailed an injury to at least one other body part; the most common associated injuries were to the head (39.8%), abdomen (36.1%), and external areas (28.0%). CONCLUSION: Spinal trauma was found to have occurred mostly in adolescent males, and the majority of those cases were due to RTCs. Data on the incidence and demographic factors of pediatric spinal trauma are crucial in furthering preventive measures, allowing for the identification of at-risk populations and treatment modalities.

Management and outcomes of cerebrovascular injuries after gunshot wounds to the cervical spine.

STUDY DESIGN: This study was a multicenter retrospective analysis of cervical spine gunshot wound (GSW) patients. OBJECTIVE: The present study was conducted to evaluate the management and outcomes of vascular injuries following GSW involving the cervical spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Gunshot wounds (GSW) injuring the cervical spine are associated with high rates of vascular injury. METHODS: Charts of patients with GSW involving the cervical spine at two Level 1 trauma centers were reviewed from 2010 to 2021 for demographics, injury characteristics, management and follow-up. Statistical analysis included T tests and ANOVA for comparisons of continuous variables and chi-square testing for categorical variables, non-parametric tests were used when indicated. Beta-binomial models were used to estimate the probabilities outcomes. Bayesian regression models were utilized to compute risk ratios (RR) and their 95 % confidence intervals (CI) to enhance the inferential robustness. RESULTS: 40 patients with cervical spine GSW and associated cerebrovascular injury were included in our analysis. 15 % of patients had Biffl grade (BG) V injuries, 50 % grade IV, and 35 % grade III-I. Angiography was performed in 35 % of patients. 5 of these patients (BG V-III) required endovascular treatment for pseudoaneurysm obliteration or parent vessel sacrifice. 7 patients (22 %) showed evidence of progression. 70 % of patients were placed on antiplatelet therapy for stroke prevention. Bayesian regression models with a skeptical prior for cerebral ischemia revealed a mean RR of 4.82 (95 % CI 1.02-14.48) in the BG V group, 0.75 (95 % CI 0.13-2.26) in the BG IV group, and 0.61 (95 % CI 0.06-2.01) in the combined BG III-I group. For demise the mean RR was 3.41 (95 % CI 0.58-10.65) in the BG V group and 1.69 (95 % CI 0.29-5.97) in the BG IV group. In the high BG (V, IV) group, 54.55 % of patients treated with antiplatelet therapy had complications. None of the patients that were treated with antiplatelet therapy in the low BG (III-I) group had complications. CONCLUSIONS: Cervical spine GSWs are associated with high-grade vascular injuries and may require early endovascular intervention. Additionally, a high rate of injury progression was seen on follow up imaging, requiring subsequent intervention. Reintervention and demise were common and observed in high BG (V, IV) groups. The incidence of stroke was low, especially in low BG (I-III) groups, suggesting that daily aspirin prophylaxis is adequate for long-term stroke prevention.

The changing epidemiology of traumatic spine injuries: a trends analysis of 26 years of patients at a major level 1 trauma center in the United States.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Traumatic spinal injuries (TSI) are associated with high morbidity, mortality, and resource utilization. The epidemiology of TSI varies greatly across different countries and regions and is impacted by national income levels, infrastructure, and cultural factors. Further, there may be changes over time. It is essential to investigate TSI to gain useful epidemiologic information. However, there have been no recent studies on trends for TSI in the US, despite the changing population demographics, healthcare policy, and technology. As a result, reexamination is warranted to reflect how the modern era has affected the epidemiology of US spine trauma patients and their management. PURPOSE: To determine epidemiologic trends in traumatic spine injuries over time. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective analysis; level 1 trauma center in the United States. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 21,811 patients, between the years of 1996 and 2022, who presented with traumatic spine injury. OUTCOME MEASURES: Age, sex, race, Injury Severity Score, mechanism of injury, injury diagnosis, injury level, rate of operative intervention, hospital length of stay, intensive care unit length of stay, discharge disposition, in-hospital mortality. METHODS: Data was collected from our institutional trauma registry over a 26-year period. Inclusion criteria involved at least one diagnosis of vertebral fracture, spinal cord injury, spinal subluxation, or intervertebral disc injury. Exclusion criteria consisted of patients with no diagnosed spine injury or a diagnosis of strain only. A total of 21,811 patients were included in the analysis. Descriptive statistics were tabulated and ordinary least squares linear regression was conducted for trends analysis. RESULTS: Regression analysis showed a significant upward trend in patient age (+13.83 years, ß=+0.65/year, p<.001), female sex (+2.7%, ß=+0.18%/year, p=.004), falls (+10.5%, ß=+0.82%/year, p<.001), subluxations (+12.8%, ß=+0.35%/year, p<.001), thoracic injuries (+1.5%, ß=+0.28%/year, p<.001), and discharges to subacute rehab (+15.9%, ß=+0.68%/year, p<.001). There was a significant downward trend in motor vehicle crashes (-7.8%, ß=-0.47%/year, p=.016), firearms injuries (-3.4%, ß=-0.19%/year, p<.001), sports/recreation injuries (-2.9%, ß=-0.18%/year, p<.001), spinal cord injuries (-11.25%, ß=-0.37%, p<.001), complete spinal cord injuries (-7.6%, ß=-0.24%/year, p<.001), and discharges to home (+4.5%, ß=-0.27%/year, p=.011). CONCLUSIONS: At our institution, the average spine trauma patient has trended toward older females. Falls represent an increasing proportion of the mechanism of injury, on a trajectory to become the most common cause. With time, there have been fewer spinal cord injuries and a lower proportion of complete injuries. At discharge, there has been a surge in the utilization of subacute rehabilitation facilities. Overall, there has been no significant change in injury severity, rate of operative intervention, length of stay, or mortality.