Surgical Apgar Score and Controlling Nutritional Status Score can be predictors of major postoperative complications after spine surgery.

Assessing intraoperative hemodynamics with Surgical Apgar Score (SAS) and preoperative nutritional status with the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score are said to be useful to predict postoperative complications in many surgical services, but little is reported in the field of spinal surgery. The purpose of this study was to assess the utility of SAS and the CONUT score for predicting the risk of major postoperative complications after spinal surgery. We included 659 people who undergone spinal surgery in our institute in eight consecutive years. The occurrence of postoperative major complications was investigated. Background clinical information, surgical information including the SAS and the CONUT score, and the length of postoperative hospital stay were collected. The risk factors of postoperative complications were assessed statistically. Complications occurred in 117 cases (17.8%). The multivariate analysis showed that history of diabetes mellitus (odds ratio [OR] 1.81: P = 0.035), coronary disease (OR 3.33; P = 0.009), American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (OR 1.71; P = 0.025), use of instruments (OR 2.07; P = 0.026), operation time (OR 1.30; P < 0.001), SAS (OR 0.59; P < 0.001), and CONUT (OR 1.34; P < 0.001) were independent risk factors of major complications after spinal surgery. Assessing the intraoperative hemodynamics with SAS and preoperative nutritional status with the CONUT score was useful in predicting major postoperative complications after spinal surgery. People who are detected as high risked people should be managed carefully after spinal surgery.

Sacroiliac and spine imaging in spondyloarthritis: Does phenotype or sex matter?

BACKGROUND: Spondyloarthritis (SpA) encompasses a spectrum of immune-mediated inflammatory conditions primarily affecting the axial skeleton, including sacroiliitis and spondylitis, each with distinct features. This study aimed to investigate imaging disparities, focusing on sacroiliac magnetic resonance and spine radiography, across phenotypes and between males and females in axial SpA. METHOD: A cross-sectional study was conducted to assess clinical data, laboratory findings, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scores of sacroiliac joints using the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) and Sacroiliac Joint Structural Score (SSS), and cervical and lumbar spine radiographs utilizing the Modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS). The study aimed to compare these parameters between two groups: axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA, radiographic and non-radiographic) and axial psoriatic arthritis (axPsA), as well as between males and females. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients were included, with 62 patients in the axSpA group and 32 patients in the axPsA group. There were no differences in disease activity, mobility, radiographic damage in the spine (Modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score- mSASSS), or sacroiliac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scores (Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada Magnetic Resonance Imaging Index - SPARCC and Sacroiliac Joint Structural Score - SSS) between the two phenotypes. Regarding sex, in imaging exams, men had higher mSASSS (p = 0.008), SSS (p = 0.001), and fat metaplasia (MG) score based on SSS (p = 0.001), while women had significantly higher SPARCC scores (p = 0.039). In the male group, the presence of HLA-B27 allele had an impact on more structural lesions on MRI (SSS), p = 0.013. CONCLUSION: In this study, imaging of sacroiliac joints and spine in patients with axial SpA did not show differences in phenotypes but did reveal differences based on sex, which may have an impact on future diagnostic recommendations. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

The reliability of virtual non-contrast reconstructions of photon-counting detector CT scans in assessing abdominal organs.

BACKGROUND: Spectral imaging of photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) scanners allows for generating virtual non-contrast (VNC) reconstruction. By analyzing 12 abdominal organs, we aimed to test the reliability of VNC reconstructions in preserving HU values compared to real unenhanced CT images. METHODS: Our study included 34 patients with pancreatic cystic neoplasm (PCN). The VNC reconstructions were generated from unenhanced, arterial, portal, and venous phase PCD-CT scans using the Liver-VNC algorithm. The observed 11 abdominal organs were segmented by the TotalSegmentator algorithm, the PCNs were segmented manually. Average densities were extracted from unenhanced scans (HUunenhanced), postcontrast (HUpostcontrast) scans, and VNC reconstructions (HUVNC). The error was calculated as HUerror=HUVNC-HUunenhanced. Pearson's or Spearman's correlation was used to assess the association. Reproducibility was evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). RESULTS: Significant differences between HUunenhanced and HUVNC[unenhanced] were found in vertebrae, paraspinal muscles, liver, and spleen. HUVNC[unenhanced] showed a strong correlation with HUunenhanced in all organs except spleen (r = 0.45) and kidneys (r = 0.78 and 0.73). In all postcontrast phases, the HUVNC had strong correlations with HUunenhanced in all organs except the spleen and kidneys. The HUerror had significant correlations with HUunenhanced in the muscles and vertebrae; and with HUpostcontrast in the spleen, vertebrae, and paraspinal muscles in all postcontrast phases. All organs had at least one postcontrast VNC reconstruction that showed good-to-excellent agreement with HUunenhanced during ICC analysis except the vertebrae (ICC: 0.17), paraspinal muscles (ICC: 0.64-0.79), spleen (ICC: 0.21-0.47), and kidneys (ICC: 0.10-0.31). CONCLUSIONS: VNC reconstructions are reliable in at least one postcontrast phase for most organs, but further improvement is needed before VNC can be utilized to examine the spleen, kidneys, and vertebrae.

Value Defects in Spine Surgery: How to Reduce Wasteful Care and Improve Value.

Technological innovation has advanced the efficacy of spine surgery for patients; however, these advances do not consistently translate into clinical effectiveness. Some patients who undergo spine surgery experience continued chronic back pain and other complications that were not present before the procedure. Defects in healthcare value, such as the lack of clinical benefit from spine surgery, are, unfortunately, common, and the US healthcare system spends $1.4 trillion annually on value defects. In this article, we examine how avoidable complications, postacute healthcare use, revision surgeries, and readmissions among spine surgery patients contribute to $67 million of wasteful spending on value defects. Furthermore, we estimate that almost $27 million of these costs could be recuperated simply by redirecting patients to facilities referred to as centers of excellence. In total, quality improvement efforts are costly to implement but may only cost about $36 million to fully correct the $67 million in finances misappropriated to value defects. The objectives of this article are to present an approach to eliminate defects in spine surgery, including a center-of-excellence framework for eliminating defects specific to this group of procedures.

Wearable bio-adhesive metal detector array (BioMDA) for spinal implants.

Dynamic tracking of spinal instrumentation could facilitate real-time evaluation of hardware integrity and in so doing alert patients/clinicians of potential failure(s). Critically, no method yet exists to continually monitor the integrity of spinal hardware and by proxy the process of spinal arthrodesis; as such hardware failures are often not appreciated until clinical symptoms manifest. Accordingly, herein, we report on the development and engineering of a bio-adhesive metal detector array (BioMDA), a potential wearable solution for real-time, non-invasive positional analyses of osseous implants within the spine. The electromagnetic coupling mechanism and intimate interfacial adhesion enable the precise sensing of the metallic implants position without the use of radiation. The customized decoupling models developed facilitate the precise determination of the horizontal and vertical positions of the implants with incredible levels of accuracy (e.g., <0.5 mm). These data support the potential use of BioMDA in real-time/dynamic postoperative monitoring of spinal implants.

Spine muscle auto segmentation techniques in MRI imaging: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The accurate segmentation of spine muscles plays a crucial role in analyzing musculoskeletal disorders and designing effective rehabilitation strategies. Various imaging techniques such as MRI have been utilized to acquire muscle images, but the segmentation process remains complex and challenging due to the inherent complexity and variability of muscle structures. In this systematic review, we investigate and evaluate methods for automatic segmentation of spinal muscles. METHODS: Data for this study were obtained from PubMed/MEDLINE databases, employing a search methodology that includes the terms 'Segmentation spine muscle' within the title, abstract, and keywords to ensure a comprehensive and systematic compilation of relevant studies. Systematic reviews were not included in the study. RESULTS: Out of 369 related studies, we focused on 12 specific studies. All studies focused on segmentation of spine muscle use MRI, in this systematic review subjects such as healthy volunteers, back pain patients, ASD patient were included. MRI imaging was performed on devices from several manufacturers, including Siemens, GE. The study included automatic segmentation using AI, segmentation using PDFF, and segmentation using ROI. CONCLUSION: Despite advancements in spine muscle segmentation techniques, challenges still exist. The accuracy and precision of segmentation algorithms need to be improved to accurately delineate the different muscle structures in the spine. Robustness to variations in image quality, artifacts, and patient-specific characteristics is crucial for reliable segmentation results. Additionally, the availability of annotated datasets for training and validation purposes is essential for the development and evaluation of new segmentation algorithms. Future research should focus on addressing these challenges and developing more robust and accurate spine muscle segmentation techniques to enhance clinical assessment and treatment planning for musculoskeletal disorders.

Do 3-dimensional Spinopelvic Characteristics Normalize After THA? A Prospective, Comparative Study Using Motion Capture Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Spinopelvic stiffness (primarily in the sagittal plane) has been identified as a factor associated with inferior patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and increased dislocation risk after THA. Incorporating preoperative spinopelvic characteristics into surgical planning has been suggested to determine a patient-specific cup orientation that minimizes dislocation risk. Sagittal plane radiographic analysis of static postures indicates that patients exhibit a degree of normalization in their spinopelvic characteristics after THA. It is not yet known whether normalization is also evident during dynamic movement patterns, nor whether it occurs in the coronal and axial planes as well. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Does motion capture analysis of sagittal spinopelvic motion provide evidence of normalization after THA? (2) Do changes in coronal and axial plane motion accompany those in the sagittal plane? METHODS: Between April 2019 and February 2020, 25 patients agreed to undergo motion capture movement analysis before THA for the treatment of hip osteoarthritis (OA). Of those, 20 underwent the same assessment between 8 and 31 months after THA. Five patients were excluded because of revision surgery (n = 1), contralateral hip OA (n = 1), and technical issues with a force plate during post-THA assessment (n = 3), leaving a cohort total of 15 (median age [IQR] 65 years [10]; seven male and eight female patients). A convenience sample of nine asymptomatic volunteers, who were free of hip and spinal pathology, was also assessed (median age 51 years [34]; four male and five female patients). Although the patients in the control group were younger than those in the patient group, this set a high bar for our threshold of spinopelvic normalization, reducing the possibility of false positive results. Three-dimensional motion capture was performed to measure spinal, pelvic, and hip motion while participants completed three tasks: seated bend and reach, seated trunk rotation, and gait on a level surface. ROM during each task was assessed and compared between pre- and post-THA conditions and between patients and controls. Statistical parametric mapping (SPM) was used to assess the timing of differences in motion during gait, and spatiotemporal gait parameters were also measured. RESULTS: After THA, patients demonstrated improvements in sagittal spinal (median [IQR] 32° [18°] versus 41° [14°]; difference of medians 9°; p = 0.004), pelvis (25° [21°] versus 30° [8°]; difference of medians 5°; p = 0.02), and hip ROM (21° [18°] versus 27° [10°]; difference of medians 6°; p = 0.02) during seated bend and reach as well in sagittal hip ROM during gait (30° [11°] versus 44° [7°]; difference of medians 14°; p < 0.001) compared with their pre-THA results, and they showed a high degree of normalization overall. These sagittal plane changes were accompanied by post-THA increases in coronal hip ROM (12° [9°] versus 18° [8°]; difference of medians 6°; p = 0.01) during seated trunk rotation, by both coronal (6° [4°] versus 9° [3°]; difference of medians 3°; p = 0.01) and axial (10° [8°] versus 16° [7°]; difference of medians 6°; p = 0.003) spinal ROM, as well as coronal (8° [3°] versus 13° [4°]; difference of medians 5°; p < 0.001) and axial hip ROM (21° [11°] versus 34° [24°]; difference of medians 13°; p = 0.01) during gait compared with before THA. The SPM analysis showed these improvements occurred during the late swing and early stance phases of gait. CONCLUSION: When restricted preoperatively, spinopelvic characteristics during daily tasks show normalization after THA, concurring with previous radiographic findings in the sagittal plane. Thus, spinopelvic characteristics change dynamically, and incorporating them into surgical planning would require predictive models on post-THA improvements to be of use. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prognostic study.

Extended Postoperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis Is Associated with No Clinical Value and Higher Projected Cost Following Adult Spinal Surgery: A Stratified Meta-Analysis and Probability-Based Cost Projections.

¼ We aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of different protocols of extended postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis (E-PAP) following adult spinal surgery.¼ Both stratified (randomized controlled trials only) and nonstratified (all studies) analyses demonstrated that E-PAP has no significant value in reducing the rate of surgical site infection (SSI), deep SSI, or superficial SSI.¼ Notably, the E-PAP protocols were associated with a significant increase in the length of hospital stay, resulting in an additional expenditure of $244.4 per episode for the E-PAP 72 hours protocol compared with PAP 24 hours and $309.8 per episode for the E-PAP >48 hours protocol compared with PAP <48 hours.¼ E-PAP does not demonstrate any significant reduction in the rate of SSIs following spine surgery. However, these extended protocols were significantly associated with an increase in the length of hospital stay and higher overall projected costs.

Letter to the editor: Prospective analysis of STRATAFIX™ symmetric PDS plus suture for fascial closure in spinal surgery: a pilot study.

Spine surgery is essential for restoring alignment, stability, and function in patients with cervical spine injuries, especially when instability, pain, deformity, or progressive nerve damage is present. Effective wound closure is vital in these procedures, aiming to promote rapid healing, reduce infection risks, enable early mobilization, and ensure satisfactory cosmetic results. However, there is limited evidence on the optimal wound closure technique for posterior spine surgery, highlighting the need for innovative approaches. A study by Glener et al. evaluated the effectiveness of STRATAFIX™ Symmetric barbed sutures compared to traditional braided absorbable sutures in spinal surgery. In a randomized trial involving 20 patients, the STRATAFIX™ group demonstrated a shorter mean closure time and significantly fewer sutures used, though without a statistically significant reduction in closure time. No significant differences were observed in postoperative complications between the groups during a six-month follow-up. While the findings suggest potential cost savings and efficiency improvements with STRATAFIX™, the study's small sample size and short follow-up period limit its generalizability. Furthermore, AI-based models, such as the Xception deep learning model, show promise in improving suture training accuracy for medical students, which could enhance surgical outcomes and reduce complications. Despite the promising results, further research with larger sample sizes, extended follow-up periods, and multi-center trials is necessary to validate the effectiveness of barbed sutures like STRATAFIX™ in neurosurgery. The integration of AI in surgical training and continued exploration of innovative techniques are essential to advancing the field and optimizing patient care in spinal surgery.

"Evaluating wound closure innovations in spinal surgery: impacts on efficiency and patient outcomes".

This study evaluates contemporary wound closure techniques in spinal surgery, focusing on the efficacy of barbed sutures, skin staples, and negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT), compared to traditional methods. Barbed sutures, like STRATAFIX™ Symmetric, and skin staples demonstrate significant advantages, including reduced wound closure time, lower infection rates, and improved surgical outcomes, particularly in multilevel or revisional procedures. In contrast, plastic surgery closures do not show a substantial reduction in postoperative complications despite being used in more complex cases. NPWT is highlighted as an effective adjunct therapy for managing surgical site infections and reducing the need for hardware removal. The findings suggest that while modern techniques offer clear benefits, traditional methods remain valuable in specific contexts. The review advocates for further research through large-scale, long-term studies and emphasizes the need for personalized wound closure strategies based on individual patient risk factors.

[Application of Erector Spinae Plane Block in Spine Surgery:A Review].

Spine surgery may lead to moderate to severe pain.Poorly controlled postoperative pain seriously affects the prognosis and recovery of patients.The erector spinae plane block (ESPB),firstly proposed in 2016 as a novel interfascial plane block,has been widely used in the management of intraoperative and postoperative pain in spine surgery.It has been confirmed as a safe,simple,and effective block.This review describes the anatomic basis,mechanism,and methods of ESPB,summarizes the clinical application of ESPB in spine surgery,and makes an outlook on the potential role of ESPB as a part in the multimodal management of postoperative pain in spine surgery.

[Analysis of risk factors for postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing spinal surgery].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the risk factors of postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing spine surgery. METHODS: The basic case data of 566 patients who underwent spine surgery under general anesthesia from January 2021 to January 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 296 males and 270 females with an average age of (71.58 ± 4.21) years old. There were 195 cases of cervical spine surgery, 26 cases of thoracic spine surgery and 345 cases of lumbar spine surgery.According to the occurrence of postoperative delirium, the patients were divided into postoperative delirium group(41 patients) and non-delirium group (525 patients). Univariate analysis was used to analyze the possible influencing factors such as gender, age, weight, smoking history, drinking history, surgical site, preoperative anxiety, intraoperative hypotension times, blood loss and so on, and binary Logistic regression was used to analyze the univariate factors with P<0.05. RESULTS: A total of 41 patients developed postoperative delirium. Univariate analysis showed that age (P=0.000), duration of surgery (P=0.039), preoperative anxiety (P=0.001), blood loss (P=0.000), history of opioid use (P=0.003), history of stroke (P=0.005), C-reactive protein (P=0.000), sodium ion(P=0.000) were significantly different between delirium group and non-delirium group. These factors were included in the binary Logistic regression analysis, and the results showed that age [OR=0.729, 95%CI(0.569, 0.932), P=0.012], opioid use [OR=21.500, 95%CI(1.334, 346.508), P=0.031], blood loss [OR=0.932, 95%CI(0.875, 0.993), P=0.029], C-reactive protein [OR=0.657, 95%CI(0.485, 0.890), P=0.007], preoperative anxiety [OR=23.143, 95%CI(1.859, 288.090), P=0.015], and sodium [OR=1.228, 95%CI(1.032, 1.461), P=0.020] were independent risk factors for the development of delirium after spinal surgery in elderly patients. CONCLUSION: Age, opioid use, blood loss, preoperative anxiety, elevated c-reactive protein, and hyponatremia are independent risk factors for the development of postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing spinal surgery.

Comparison of three artificial intelligence algorithms for automatic cobb angle measurement using teaching data specific to three disease groups.

Spinal deformities, including adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and adult spinal deformity (ASD), affect many patients. The measurement of the Cobb angle on coronal radiographs is essential for their diagnosis and treatment planning. To enhance the precision of Cobb angle measurements for both AIS and ASD, we developed three distinct artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms: AIS/ASD-trained AI (trained with both AIS and ASD cases); AIS-trained AI (trained solely on AIS cases); ASD-trained AI (trained solely on ASD cases). We used 1612 whole-spine radiographs, including 1029 AIS and 583 ASD cases with variable postures, as teaching data. We measured the major and two minor curves. To assess the accuracy, we used 285 radiographs (159 AIS and 126 ASD) as a test set and calculated the mean absolute error (MAE) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between each AI algorithm and the average of manual measurements by four spine experts. The AIS/ASD-trained AI showed the highest accuracy among the three AI algorithms. This result suggested that learning across multiple diseases rather than disease-specific training may be an efficient AI learning method. The presented AI algorithm has the potential to reduce errors in Cobb angle measurements and improve the quality of clinical practice.

Cadence matters: Influence of cadence on spinal load during running.

BACKGROUND: Running exposes the body to physiological and mechanical stresses that generate musculoskeletal injuries, such as low back pain due to large spinal loading. Increasing running cadence may reduce impact forces and spinal shrinkage. RESEARCH QUESTION: This study aimed to determine the relationship between spinal loading and running cadence. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 15 runners from the local community (36 ± 11 years; 23 ± 2 kg.m-2, and 8 ± 9 years of running experience) who ran for 30 min (R30) and 60 min (R60) at a constant speed (10 km.h-1). The spinal loading was assessed via fine stature variation measurements before the run (baseline) at R30 and R60. Cadence was monitored via a wristwatch. The cadence ranged from 150 to 180 steps.min-1. A t-test was used to compare stature loss between R30 and R60 (relative to baseline), and a stepwise linear regression equation was used to identify the relationship between cadence and stature variation in each instant. RESULTS: There was a stature loss throughout the race (R30 = 5.27 ± 1.92 mm and R60 =7.51 ± 2.51 mm). A linear regression analysis revealed a negative relationship between stature loss and cadence, indicating that running at a faster cadence produces smaller spinal loading than running at slower cadences after R60 (R2 = 0.38; p<0.05). SIGNIFICANCE: Increasing running cadence might cause less spinal loading than running with a slower cadence, which may reduce the risk of injury and back disorders in runners.

A Review of 3D Modalities Used for the Diagnosis of Scoliosis.

Spine radiographs in the standing position are the recommended standard for diagnosing idiopathic scoliosis. Though the deformity exists in 3D, its diagnosis is currently carried out with the help of 2D radiographs due to the unavailability of an efficient, low-cost 3D alternative. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are not suitable in this case, as they are obtained in the supine position. Research on 3D modelling of scoliotic spine began with multiplanar radiographs and later moved on to biplanar radiographs and finally a single radiograph. Nonetheless, modern advances in diagnostic imaging have the potential to preserve image quality and decrease radiation exposure. They include the DIERS formetric scanner system, the EOS imaging system, and ultrasonography. This review article briefly explains the technology behind each of these methods. They are compared with the standard imaging techniques. The DIERS system and ultrasonography are radiation free but have limitations with respect to the quality of the 3D model obtained. There is a need for 3D imaging technology with less or zero radiation exposure and that can produce a quality 3D model for diseases like adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Accurate 3D models are crucial in clinical practice for diagnosis, planning surgery, patient follow-up examinations, biomechanical applications, and computer-assisted surgery.

Intravenous versus topical tranexamic acid in spinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The administration of tranexamic acid (TXA) during spinal surgery has been shown to reduce blood loss. However, the efficacy and safety of intravenous TXA (ivTXA) and topical TXA (tTXA) are poorly documented. The present meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of ivTXA and tTXA administration in spinal surgery. METHODS: Potentially relevant academic articles were identified from PubMed, Ovid, Cochrane Library, CNKI database, and Wanfang Data from the date of inception until March 1, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nonrandomized controlled trials (non-RCTs) were included in our meta-analysis if they compared the efficacy and safety of ivTXA versus tTXA administration during spinal surgery. Secondary sources were identified from the references of the included literature. The meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the guidelines of the Cochrane Reviewer's Handbook and the PRISMA statement. Data were summarized using RevMan 5.3 software from Denmark. RESULTS: Four RCTs and one non-RCT met our inclusion criteria. The pooled outcomes demonstrated that ivTXA groups compared with tTXA groups had significantly less amount of total blood loss [weighted mean difference (WMD)=-159.55, 95% CI (-181.91,-137.19), P < 0.00001], hidden blood loss [WMD=-132.27, 95% CI (-159.81, -104.72), P < 0.00001], intraoperative blood loss [WMD=-86.22, 95% CI (-99.13, -73.31), P < 0.00001, I2 = 96%], and more high postoperative hemoglobin level [WMD = 8.96, 95% CI (5.18, 12.75), P < 0.00001, I2 = 29%], and less transfusion rate [risk ratio (RR) = 1.11, 95% CI (0.81,1.52), P = 0.50, I2 = 94%]. The pooled results showed no significant difference in thromboembolic events (deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis demonstrated that ivTXA was more effective than tTXA in inducing hemostatic effect during spinal surgery. However, the risk of a thrombotic event was not different between the two administration methods of TXA. More high quality RCTs are needed to further confirm our conclusions.

The impact of sarcopenia on the incidence of postoperative outcomes following spine surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Sarcopenia is considered to be an important predictor of adverse outcomes following spinal surgery, but the specific relationship between the two is not clear. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to systematically review all relevant studies to evaluate the impact of sarcopenia on spinal surgery outcomes. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library for relevant articles published on or before January 9, 2023. The pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated in a random effects meta-analysis. The main outcome was the risk of adverse outcomes after spinal surgery, including adverse events and mortality. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines to evaluate the impact of sarcopenia on spinal surgery outcomes. In addition, we also conducted a subgroup analysis and leave-one-out sensitivity analyses to explore the main sources of heterogeneity and the stability of the results. RESULTS: Twenty-four cohort studies, with a total of 243,453 participants, met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis showed that sarcopenia was significantly associated with adverse events (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.17-2.27, P < 0.001) but was no significantly associated with mortality (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.93-1.46, P = 0.180), infection (OR 2.24, 95% CI 0.95-5.26, P < 0.001), 30-day reoperation (OR 1.47, 95% CI 0.92-2.36, P = 0.413), deep vein thrombosis (OR 1.78, 95% CI 0.69-4.61, P = 0.234), postoperative home discharge (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.26-1.37, P = 0.002) and blood transfusion (OR 3.28, 95% CI 0.74-14.64, P = 0.015). CONCLUSION: The current meta-analysis showed that patients with sarcopenia have an increased risk of adverse events and mortality after spinal surgery. However, these results must be carefully interpreted because the number of studies included is small and the studies are significantly different. These findings may help to increase the clinicians' awareness of the risks concerning patients with sarcopenia to improve their prognosis.

Opioid alternatives in spine surgeries.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The escalating opioid crisis has intensified the need to explore alternative pain management strategies for patients undergoing spine surgery. This review is timely and relevant as it synthesizes recent research on opioid alternatives for perioperative management, assessing their efficacy, side effects, and postoperative outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS: A systematic search was conducted to capture articles from the past 18 months that examined opioid-sparing strategies. Findings indicate that multimodal analgesia, incorporating nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, lidocaine, gabapentinoids, N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists, dexmedetomidine, and emerging regional block techniques like the erector spinae block and TLIF (thoraco lumbar interfascial block), can significantly reduce opioid consumption without compromising pain relief. Additionally, these approaches reduce opioid-related side effects such as postoperative nausea, vomiting, and prolonged hospital stays. SUMMARY: The use of multimodal analgesia aligns with current pain management guidelines and addresses public health concerns related to opioid misuse. While effective, these alternatives are not without side effects, and the ultimate outcome depends on balancing benefits and risks. Future research should focus on the long-term outcomes of opioid alternatives, their effectiveness across diverse populations, and further validation and optimization of these strategies.