Vipera ammodytes bites treated with antivenom ViperaTAb: a case series with pharmacokinetic evaluation.

CONTEXT: In clinical practice it is difficult to differentiate between V. berus and V. ammodytes venomous bites. In the past this was not a concern, but due to the current shortage in Viperfav™ and European viper venom antiserum availability, V. a. ammodytes venomous bites have recently been treated with ViperaTAb®, which is a pharmaceutical formulation containing a monospecific ovine Fab fragments against the venom of V. berus. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate ViperaTAb® in V. a. ammodytes envenomations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective case series of three consecutive patients envenomed by V. a. ammodytes snakebite treated with ViperaTAb®. V. ammodytes venom, neurotoxic ammodytoxins, and Fab fragment levels were determined in serum samples and a pharmacokinetic analysis of the antivenom Fab fragments was carried out. RESULTS: Three patients bitten by V. a. ammodytes with extensive local swelling, neurological symptoms and recurrent thrombocytopenia were treated with ViperaTAb®. V. ammodytes venom was detected in serum of all three patients. Ammodytoxins were detected in the serum of only the most severely envenomed patient who developed neurological symptoms. In the presented moderate cases, a dose of 8 mL of ViperaTAb® reduced swelling and improved systemic effects, such as thrombocytopenia. However, this dose of ViperaTAb® was not effective in the most severely envenomed patient with the highest serum values of V. ammodytes venom. In this case ViperaTAb® did not stop local swelling and it had no effect on neurological signs. ViperaTAb®'s systemic clearance, distribution and elimination half-lives were 4.3-13.4 mL/h/kg, 1.2-3.2 h and 14.1-55.4 h, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients envenomed by V. a. ammodytes venom, ViperaTAb® reduces moderate swelling and temporarily improves systemic effects, except neurological symptoms. ViperaTAb® application induces a decrement of V. ammodytes venom level in the blood, but did not affect serum concentration of neurotoxic ammodytoxins in the one patient with measurable concentrations.

Progressive loss of antiemetic efficacy during subsequent courses of chemotherapy.

The maintenance of the antiemetic efficacy of a combined protocol (intravenous methylprednisolone, oral thiethylperazine and oral amitriptyline) during six consecutive courses of adjuvant FAC chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide) was analysed in 107 female breast cancer patients who completed the six planned courses of treatment. A continuous decrease in complete (no vomiting episodes) and major protection rate (0-2 vomiting episodes) was evident during chemotherapy. Complete protection rate decreased from 62.6% in the first course to 48.6% in the sixth (P less than 0.05, chi 2 test). The respective figures for major protection rate were 76.6% and 58% (P less than 0.01, chi 2 test). These data, together with other from the literature, should be taken into consideration when reviewing the overall results of current antiemetic trials, which usually only mention the results obtained in the first course of chemotherapy.

The antiemetic efficacy of thiethylperazine and methylprednisolone versus thiethylperazine and placebo in breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (fluorouracil, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide). A randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial.

Forty-six women with breast cancer treated with adjuvant FAC (fluorouracil, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide) entered a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial in which thiethylperazine (T) (6.5 mg p.o every 8 h x 3 days) plus methylprednisolone (MP) (250 mg i.v. x 2 doses) was compared with thiethylperazine plus placebo. Forty-four patients were evaluable for efficacy. T + MP was significantly better in reducing vomiting (p less than 0.01) and nausea (p less than 0.02). The complete protection rate against vomiting was 36% for T + MP compared to 18% for T + placebo, and the percentage of nausea grades 0 + 1 (none or slight) was 59% and 27% respectively. The patient preference after cross-over was strikingly in favor of T + MP (70% versus 13%) (p less than 0.001). The most important side-effects of T + MP were facial flushing (22%) and euphoria (27%). Other side-effects, such as dryness of the mouth and sedation, were common after both treatments. In conclusion, the study suggested that T + MP is superior to T alone in protecting from nausea and vomiting induced by FAC.

Treatment of Wegener's granulomatosis with intermittent high-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide.

PURPOSE: Concerns regarding the long-term toxicity of daily cyclophosphamide (CP) therapy for the systemic vasculitides have led us to evaluate alternative approaches to treatment in an attempt to achieve comparable efficacy with less toxicity. This study sought to determine the efficacy, toxicity, and immunologic effects of glucocorticoids (GC) and intermittent high-dose intravenous CP ("pulse" CP) in the treatment of 14 patients with Wegener's granulomatosis (WG). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The diagnosis of active WG was supported by a typical clinical presentation and histopathologic findings of vasculitis, granulomatous inflammation, and tissue necrosis. GC treatment was initially provided on a daily basis and later tapered to an alternate-day schedule if vasculitis remained inactive. Pulse CP treatment was initially administered once a month for 6 months. If after 6 months remission had been attained and GC therapy had been discontinued, then pulse CP treatment was given at less frequent intervals thereafter. Treatment and evaluation were provided for participants as inpatients in a clinical research center (National Institutes of Health). RESULTS: Thirteen of 14 patients (93%) initially experienced unequivocal improvement with pulse CP therapy, and seven of 14 (50%) achieved remission within 4 months. However, treatment was associated with significant toxicity in two patients and later relapses in nine patients, so that a total of 79% either failed to achieve sustained remission or were unable to continue therapy. Three of 14 (21%) patients have achieved sustained remissions with the pulse CP protocol and one additional patient (who had a limited exacerbation of WG) continues to receive that therapy after 14 to 22 months (mean 17 months). CONCLUSIONS: The use of pulse CP and GC therapy in 14 patients with WG was associated with a high initial response rate. However, failure to respond initially to treatment, to sustain improvement, or to tolerate continued treatment was noted in 79% of patients within a period of 1 to 22 months. These observations indicate that this particular pulse CP protocol does not achieve a high degree of lasting efficacy.

[Torecan-induced neuroleptic malignant syndrome].

Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is an uncommon, life-threatening complication of treatment with neuroleptic drugs. Its main features are hyperthermia, extrapyramidal signs, and autonomic instability with fluctuating consciousness. It is believed that NMS is related to dopamine receptor blockade in the brain. We describe a case in a 52-year-old diabetic woman who developed NMS after taking Torecan (thiethylperazine), a phenothiazine drug, for 3 months to relieve dizziness. It is important to recognize this syndrome early and to treat immediately.

Randomized crossover comparison of high-dose intravenous metoclopramide versus a five-drug antiemetic regimen.

In a randomized open crossover study, the antiemetic efficacy of a five-drug antiemetic regimen consisting of metoclopramide, dexamethasone, diazepam, diphenhydramine, and thiethylperazine was compared to that of high-dose metoclopramide. Thirteen patients treated with cisplatin combination chemotherapy regimens were evaluated. The study was terminated prior to accrual of the planned number of patients because of the statistically significant difference in efficacy between treatments found at interim analysis. The duration of nausea and number of vomiting episodes on the day of chemotherapy were significantly less (p less than 0.01) after receiving the five-drug combination. After receiving the five-drug regimen, 77% of the patients did not experience any episodes of vomiting on day 1, and 8% of patients had only one episode. In contrast, only 31% of patients treated with high-dose metoclopramide did not have any episodes of vomiting on day 1, and 61% of the patients had five or more episodes. None of the patients treated with the five-drug regimen required additional antiemetic administration. Although both regimens were, in general, well tolerated, when given the choice of continuing antiemetic therapies, 92% of the patients preferred the five-drug antiemetic combination.

Torecan, a review of references and clinical control examinations.

The author summarizes the theoretical aspects of vomiting and alleviation of the same by surveying the respective scientific communications with special regard to thiethylperazine. The antiemetic effect of the Hungarian preparation containing thiethyilperazine (Torecan inj., EGIS Pharmaceuticals) is evaluated by the controlled clinical examination of patients receiving combined cytostatic treatment. According to the results Torecan proved to be significantly more effective in the alleviation of the emetic effect of the cytostatics than placebo.

The importance of domperidone (Motilium) in controlling postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Comparative study was performed for assessing the postoperative anti-emetic and emesis preventive effect of domperidone. It has been found that the emesis preventive effect of Motilium tablet is identical with the effect of the well known Daedalon (Dramamin) and Torecan. From the therapeutic aspect it is of value especially in controlling nausea and in the prevention of subsequent vomiting following the use of rectal anti-emetics. This difference is attributable to the oral route of administration. Considering the lack of toxic effects domperidone is the most favourable.

The anti-emetic properties of 1-sulpiride in a ground-based model of space motion sickness.

L-sulpiride, at a dose of 4 mg/kg, essentially abolished motion-induced emesis in a group of 6 squirrel monkeys undergoing horizontal rotation at 25 rpm, a terrestrial model of space motion sickness (SMS). Extrapyramidal side effects were not observed. In the absence of the drug, the usual emetic response returned. In comparison while typical neuroleptics were also strongly anti-emetic, they produced a considerable degree of rigidity and akinesia.

Results of two controlled studies on antiemetic combination against vomiting induced by 5-fluorouracil.

A group of 132 patients with different disseminated solid tumors entered two consecutive antiemetic trials in which 5-fluorouracil given in a 120-h continuous infusion was the emetogenic stimulus. The purpose of the trials was to investigate the validity of Peroutka and Snyder's hypothesis. These authors suggested that CNS receptors other than the classical dopamine D-2 (e.g., histamine H-1 and muscarinic cholinergic receptors) were involved in emetic response. Hence, a combination of a phenothiazine (an antidopaminergic drug) with an antihistaminic or a tricyclic antidepressant (H-1 and muscarinic cholinergic blockers) was suggested to be possibly superior to phenothiazine alone against antineoplastic chemotherapy-induced vomiting. The first study showed the antiemetic superiority of a phenothiazine (thiethylperazine) over placebo but failed to show a superiority of the combination of thiethylperazine and an antihistaminic (diphenhydramine) over thiethylperazine alone. In contrast, the second study proved the superiority of the combination of thiethylperazine and a tricyclic antidepressant (amitriptyline) over thiethylperazine alone. In conclusion, tricyclic antidepressants - but not antihistaminics - potentiate the antiemetic activity of thiethylperazine against 5-fluorouracil-induced vomiting.

Evaluation of domperidone as a modifier of gamma-radiation-induced emesis.

The D2 antidopaminergic drug domperidone was evaluated, singly and in combination with synthetic adrenocorticoid and an H2 antihistamine, for its ability to reduce the acute emetic effects of 60Co whole-body radiation. Random-source adult male dogs were fasted 12 hr, fed a standard meal, injected 44 min later, and irradiated 47 min after that. Four groups of dogs were irradiated after drug injections as follows: saline (Con), domperidone (Dom), cimetidine + thiethylperazine (Cim + Thi), and dexamethasone + domperidone + cimetidine (Dex + Dom + Cim). Drug quantities given the dogs represented 10 mg Dom, 10 mg Thi, 20 mg Dex, and 300 mg Cim for an average human (70 kg, 1.8 m2). Subjects were exposed on an up-down schedule to determine the radiation necessary to produce vomiting in 50% (ED50) of each group. Emesis onset and offset times and number of episodes were recorded. The Dom group had more emetic episodes than any other. The Dex + Dom + Cim combination significantly raised the emetic threshold while maintaining episodes at a low incidence.

Antiemetic combination for PAC (cisplatin-adriamycin-cyclophosphamide) chemotherapy-induced emesis in ovarian cancer.

Twenty-six patients suffering from disseminated epithelial ovarian cancer (FIGO stages III and IV) under treatment with Cisplatin (80-100 mg/m2 in 8 hours) in combination on the same day with Cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2 IV) and Adriamycin (50 mg/m2), a severely emetogenic regimen, entered a randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial comparing the antiemetic activity of high-dose IV Metoclopramide (1 mg/kg/dose X 5 doses) with that of a combination of Metoclopramide (same schedule) plus Nortriptyline (50 mg PO X 2 doses) plus Thiethylperazine (10 mg IV X 3 doses). The antiemetic combination was designed in an attempt to act simultaneously on gastrointestinal motility and neuroreceptors at the central emetic pathways (dopamine D-2, histamine H-1 and muscarinic cholinergic). This combination significantly reduced the emesis due to chemotherapy when compared with Metoclopramide alone and was also preferred by a significant number of patients after passing through both the antiemetic arms being compared.

Immediate termination of intractable vomiting induced by cisplatin combination chemotherapy using an intensive five-drug antiemetic regimen.

A five-drug parenteral antiemetic regimen was administered to 17 patients experiencing intractable vomiting following treatment with cisplatin-containing combination chemotherapy. The five-drug treatment consisted of metoclopramide (1 mg/kg iv), diphenhydramine (50 mg im), dexamethasone (20 mg iv), diazepam (5 mg iv), and thiethylperazine (10 mg im), given together at the initiation of the regimen and repeated on a predefined schedule. The number of emetic episodes, duration of nausea and vomiting, and adverse effects were recorded by trained observers. In addition, all patients completed standardized evaluation forms on the day after treatment. Thirteen patients (76%) remained free of vomiting and three (18%) had only one emesis after beginning the study treatment. No serious toxicity was encountered. We conclude that intractable vomiting induced by cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy can be successfully terminated with an aggressive parenteral antiemetic regimen.

The antiemetic activity of tetrahydrocannabinol versus metoclopramide and thiethylperazine in patients undergoing cancer chemotherapy.

A double blind-cross-over randomised clinical trial has been conducted to compare the antiemetic effects of tetrahydrocannabinol, thiethylperazine and metoclopramide. There were no significant differences in the antiemetic effects of these drugs. The incidence of adverse reactions as recorded by both the staff and the patients was significantly higher in the tetrahydrocannabinol group than in either the metoclopramide or thiethylperazine groups. This trial has established that in the dosages used tetrahydrocannabinol given by mouth has an antiemetic effect of approximately the same order as thiethylperazine and metoclopramide. However, its adverse effects are sufficiently greater than those of the other agents to prevent is widespread usage for this purpose. Tetrahydrocannabinol taken by mouth is not recommended as a routine antiemetic agent in cancer chemotherapy.

Control of radiation-induced emesis with promethazine, cimetidine, thiethylperazine, or naloxone.

Promethazine (2 mg/kg), cimetidine (4 mg/kg), thiethylperazine (0.86 mg/kg), and naloxone (0.08 mg/kg) were each evaluated for their ability to increase the threshold of radiation-induced emesis in the dog. Each dog was fed a can of dog food (ca 0.4 kg) and then injected IM with the appropriate drug 1 hour before being irradiated by a 60Co teletherapy unit. The total radiation dose given an individual dog was determined by an up-and-down exposure schedule. Dogs were then observed continuously for 10 hours while the number, time of onset, and duration of each emetic episode were monitored. The dose of radiation causing emesis in 50% (ED50 +/- SEM) of control dogs was 170 +/- 38.5 rad. The ED50 +/- SEM was increased to 402 +/- 18.6 rad by promethazine, to 331 +/- 27.3 rad by cimetidine, and to 320 +/- 38.5 rad by thiethylperazine. This increased tolerance was significant at P less than 0.05 for each drug. The ED50 for naloxone was 262.5 +/- 92.9 rad, which was not a statistically significant increase in threshold.

Comparative investigation between thiethylperazine and meclizine in vertigo of different genesis.

Forty patients suffering from vertigo of different genesis received thiethylperazine 6.5 mg or meclizine 25 mg, 2 capsules a day for 5 days, according to double-blind, cross-over methodology in randomized order. It appeared that the effect on the symptoms vertigo, gait disturbance and nausea does not differ significantly for the two preparations. On the other hand, an almost significant effect on vertigo, and, to a smaller degree, on gait disturbances, was obtained during the second period of treatment, independent of administered preparation. Side-effects in the form of fatigue and headache occur to the same extent after both preparations. Meclizine should be an alternative to thiethylperazine in the treatment of vertigo, especially in patients who might risk chronic dyskinesia in long-term treatment.